Exhibit G: Weed Management and Revegetation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exhibit G: Weed Management and Revegetation Plan Exhibit G: Weed Management and Revegetation Plan THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Southeast Metro Natural Gas Project Weed Management and Revegetation Plan PREPARED Public Service Company of Colorado FOR: COPY TO: Environmental Planning Group, LLC PREPARED Matt Kizlinski, Hemlock Environmental Consulting, LLC BY: DATE: December 2019 Introduction Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo), dba Xcel Energy, is proposing to replace approximately 5.2 miles of 20-inch diameter steel natural gas transmission pipeline. The Southeast Metro Natural Gas Project (SEMNGP, the Project) consists of installing and operating a new pipeline between an existing regulator station, F917, near the intersection of East Caley Avenue and South Troy Circle in the City of Centennial, and an existing valve set near South Yosemite Avenue and East Hampden Avenue in the City and County of Denver. This section of pipeline is an integral portion of the larger 20-inch diameter pipeline system that provides natural gas to the southeastern Denver metropolitan area. This pipeline would traverse land managed or owned by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) – Cherry Creek State Park (the Park), the City and County of Denver, City of Aurora, unincorporated Arapahoe County, City of Greenwood Village, and the City of Centennial (Figure 1). This replacement section is part of an existing natural gas pipeline constructed in the 1950s that delivers natural gas between the same two project end points. Vegetation Status Habitats within the Project area are typically dry upland grasslands with smaller inclusions of shrublands. The portion of the Project passing through undeveloped lands, i.e., south of I-225, will impact vegetation. The Project will impact vegetation on lands managed by Greenwood Village, Cherry Creek School District (CCSD), Cherry Creek State Park (the Park) both within construction areas and temporary use areas. The purpose of this memo is to assess the potential impacts and develop an approach to restore the plant community post-construction. Uplands are generally a mix of native and non-native grasses while drainages present more diversity and hydric vegetation. Weeds are common. Table 1 presents common vegetation within the Park. That portion of the Project crossing CCSD athletic fields will be restored in coordination with CCSD. Of the approximate 3.6 miles of pipeline through the Park, about 2.2 miles pass through active black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) colonies. Predation by raptors and coyote have been observed; however, prairie dog populations are generally unchecked. As a consequence, vegetation within and adjacent to the colonies has been heavily impacted. Some areas exhibit very low to no vegetative cover. G-1 Table 1 Common Plant Species Scientific Name Common Name Trees/Shrubs Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus Viscid Rabbitbrush Eleagnus angustifolia Russian Olive Populus deltoides Plains Cottonwood Rhus trilobata Shunkbush Sumac Ribes aereum Golden Current Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust Salix exigua Coyote Willow Yucca glauca Great Plains Yucca Forbs/Grasses Asclepias speciosa Showy Milkweed Bromus inermis Smooth Brome Bromus tectorum Cheatgrass Carduus nutans Musk Thistle Circium arvense Canada Thistle Conium maculatum Poison Hemlock Convulvulus arvensis Field Bindweed Dipsacus fullonum Teasel Euphorbia esula Leafy Spurge Glycyrrhiza lepidota Wild Licorice Hordeum jubatum Foxtail Barley Juncus balticus Baltic Rush Lathyrus polymorphus Manystem Pea Melilotus officinalis Yellow Sweetclover Opuntia polyacantha Plains Pricklypear Oxytropis lambertii Purple Locoweed Pascopyrum smithii Western Wheatgrass Penstemon sp Penstemon Poa bulbosa Bulbus Blue Grass Poa pratensis Kentucky Blue Grass Rumex crispus Curly Dock Thalaspi arvense Field Pennycress Typha angustifolia Narrowleaf Cattail Verbascum thapsus Mullein G-2 The Park performs regular surveys of weed species, mapping both individuals and larger populations. The Project received the most recent weed data from the Park to determine which species are relevant1. Table 2 presents those weed species populations crossed by the Project and are show on Figure 1. In most instances, these mapped weed patches are collocated with prairie dog colonies. Table 2 Weed Species Within the Project Area Scientific Name Common Name Colorado Status1 Bromus tectorum Cheatgrass C Carduus nutans Musk Thistle B Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle B Convolvulus arvensis Field Bindweed C Descurainia sophia Flixweed NL Dipsacus fullonum Teasel B Elaeagnus angustifolia Russian Olive B Linaria dalmatica Dalmation Toadflax B Rumex crispus Curly Dock NL Verbascum thapsis Common Mullien C 1List B species are those with discrete statewide distributions that are subject to eradication, containment, or suppression in portions of the State designated by the commissioner in order to stop the continued spread of these species. List C species are those that are widespread and well established for which control is recommended but not required by the State, although local governing bodies may require management. NL species are not listed by the state but tracked by CPW. Project Disturbances During construction, a 75-foot wide construction corridor will be used to install the pipeline. This corridor narrows through drainage crossings. Though the entire corridor will not be excavated, it is presumed the entire corridor will be disturbed by vehicle, equipment, and foot traffic and require reclamation. Construction is anticipated to begin late summer 2020 and continue through the winter, concluding in summer 2021. Construction may be active at multiple locations at once, with different segments in differing stages of construction. Guidance CPW provided the Cherry Creek State Park Revegetation/Reclamation Seed Mixes and Specifications (CPW Specifications, undated), and is the primary guidance document relating to weeds and revegetation. Colorado Department of Health and the Environment (CDPHE) will 1 Personal Communication. Steve Williams, CPW Invasive Species Mapping & Management, email to Matt Kizlinski, Hemlock Environmental Consulting. Re: Cherry Creek State Park Weed Data. August 28, 2019. G-3 administer the Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). The SWMP will require post-construction restored vegetation to reach 70 percent of pre-construction coverage. General Practices The Project will enact the following measures throughout the construction period to promote successful revegetation. Pre-Construction Information will be gathered to document existing conditions This information is either already documented or is to be collected immediately prior to construction, as listed below: 1. A Reclamation Line List will be developed, containing a summary of per parcel information including land use type, irrigation system, soil composition, surface cover, noxious weeds, and a summary of side agreements with the landowner. This will serve as the baseline from which reclamation success will be measured. 2. The SWMP contains pre-construction information regarding surface flow direction as well as numerous site photos. 3. The Environmental Observer will perform a pre-construction site assessment for each parcel. This information will be recorded according to the Pre-construction Condition Sheet and will include numerous site photos. This form will provide a baseline that the post- construction condition can be checked against. Assessment comments regarding the site condition will also be added to the Reclamation Line List. Construction The construction portion of Reclamation Plan relates to the practices during construction to minimize construction impacts and promote faster and complete restoration. The practices are listed as part of the overall permitting requirements, including individual property owner reclamation specifications, Reclamation Line List prescriptions, vehicle and equipment washing requirements, included in topsoil handling practices, addressed as part of the Dewatering practices, addressed as part of the SWMP practices to minimize sediment transport, and measures taken as conditions arise requiring action. These growing practices are spelled out in the list below, which will be expanded/adjusted as appropriate as the project progresses: 1. ROW/disturbance limits to be physically and continuously delineated to prevent construction activity outside of the ROW. 2. Contractor to exit and enter construction ROW only at designated points. 3. When stripping back topsoil, contractor is to create a pronounced topsoil windrow with steep sides. This approach reduces moisture loss in the pealed soil, reduces surface exposure to minimize wind erosion, greatly reduces the likelihood of the soil furrow being driven over and needlessly compacted, it aids in clearly defining the construction limit, and, when on the down• gradient side, it acts as a SWMP BMP. 4. The topsoil stripping depth and locations will be determined in consultation with the land manager. 5. Topsoil and subsoil should never be mixed. Mixing may be prevented by removing all topsoil in the area of construction, stopping work, placing wood mats for construction traffic to drive on to distribute load, or other means to be approved. 6. In areas where all the topsoil has been stripped but the subsoil soils have become saturated, work is to stop or mats are to be placed to prevent rutting. The Environmental Observer has the authority to stop work when rutting is likely to impact the soil structure and increase soil compaction. The
Recommended publications
  • Lee Gulch Panels 171P-180P Little Comanche Creek Panel 181P
    VOLUME 1 OF 6 ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number ARAPAHOE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 080011 AURORA, CITY OF 080002 CENTENNIAL, CITY OF 080315 CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF 080013 COLUMBINE VALLEY, TOWN OF 080014 *DEER TRAIL, CITY OF 080015 ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF 085074 *FOXFIELD, TOWN OF 080091 GLENDALE, CITY OF 080247 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF 080195 LITTLETON, CITY OF 080017 SHERIDAN, CITY OF 080018 *NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED REVISED: SEPTEMBER 4, 2020 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 08005CV001E NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. This FIS report was revised on September 4, 2020. Users should refer to Section 10.0, Revisions Description, for further information. Section 10.0 is intended to present the most up- to-date information for specific portions of this FIS report. Therefore, users of this report should be aware that the information presented in Section 10.0 supersedes information in Sections 1.0 through 9.0 of this FIS report.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Arapahoe County
    History of Arapahoe County Arapahoe County was named for the Arapaho Indians, one of the In the late 1820s, trappers searched larger tribes of plains Indians, who along with the Cheyenne occupied this region for beavers to supply Arapahoe County east of the foothills running into what is now western the great demand for mens beaver Kansas. Arapahoe County is Colorado’s first county, since almost hats. In the late 1830s and 1840s, half of the entire area now Colorado was Arapahoe County of the the demand shifted to buffalo Kansas territory. In 1861, when Kansas was made a state, Colorado skins. In 1832, the first trading was made a territory with Arapahoe County as one of the 17 original post on the South Platte River was counties. built on Cherry Creek, which was then part of Arapahoe County. The original Arapahoe County was 30 miles wide and extended from Sheridan Boulevard, the present western boundary of Denver, Adams In 1848, gold prospectors on and Arapahoe counties to the Kansas border. This peculiar shape was their way to California stopped in due to the practice of giving counties with large amounts of plains Colorado long enough to pan its territory at least some of the foothill territory where there was water streams. They found gold on West for mining and irrigation. Even though Arapahoe County did not Dartmouth Avenue, just west of reach the foothills, the streams running from the mountains supplied Englewood where Dry Creek flows water. As settlers came in and took up lands on the eastern portions into the Platte River.
    [Show full text]
  • Arapahoe County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 2 OF 6 ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number ARAPAHOE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 080011 AURORA, CITY OF 080002 CENTENNIAL, CITY OF 080315 CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF 080013 COLUMBINE VALLEY, TOWN OF 080014 *DEER TRAIL, CITY OF 080015 ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF 085074 *FOXFIELD, TOWN OF 080091 GLENDALE, CITY OF 080247 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF 080195 LITTLETON, CITY OF 080017 SHERIDAN, CITY OF 080018 *NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED REVISED: SEPTEMBER 4, 2020 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 08005CV002E NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. This FIS report was revised on September 4, 2020. Users should refer to Section 10.0, Revisions Description, for further information. Section 10.0 is intended to present the most up- to-date information for specific portions of this FIS report. Therefore, users of this report should be aware that the information presented in Section 10.0 supersedes information in Sections 1.0 through 9.0 of this FIS report.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherry Creek Regional Trail
    Douglas County Parks, Trails, and Building Grounds Information Cherry Creek Regional Trail Current and future projects: www.douglas.co.us/parksandtrails/Current_and_Future_Projects.html Users Dog off-leash areas: • Bicyclists www.douglas.co.us/parksandtrails/Dog_Off_Leash.html • Dogs on-leash • Equestrian users Field availability or field reservations: 720-733-6990 • Hikers The Division of Parks and Trails has athletic fields available for reservation throughout the year. Note: Fields are reserved according to past usage. Previous user requests are processed in February for the Trail Rating entire year. Requests for availability after February are processed in the • Easy and accessible order in which they are received. • Gravel detours on roadways and livestock gates are minor obstacles • Enjoy cottonwoods, willows and grasslands along the trail Field closures: 720-733-6999 Trail Length Local parks: • Approximately 17 miles (will be a total of 24 miles once completed) www.douglas.co.us/parksandtrails/Local_Parks.html • Parallels Cherry Creek and will eventually connect Cherry Creek State Park to the north and Castlewood Canyon State Park to the south. Regional parks: Connects parks and open space properties, as well as Parker, Centennial www.douglas.co.us/parksandtrails/Regional_Parks.html and Franktown. This trail is a part of the Colorado Front Range Trail. Reserve a picnic shelter: 720-733-6990 Trail Surface Reservations require a minimum of two weeks advanced notice • Finished portions have 8-foot-wide concrete surfaces Reservation rates: • Some detour connections are gravel (approximately 1.5 miles of gravel) www.douglas.co.us/parksandtrails/Group_Picnic_Shelters.html Amenities Trail maps: • Picnic shelters at trailheads and parks www.douglas.co.us/parksandtrails/Find_Trails_Maps.html • Restrooms Feedback: 720-733-6990 Location Douglas County wants to hear from you.
    [Show full text]
  • High Line Canal Trailmap
    71.0 E 64th Ave East 56th Avenue Picadilly Road First Creek Green Valley Ranch Blvd Argonne Street 65.0 Himalaya Road 66.0 43rd Ave Green Valley Ranch Tower Road Tower 64.0 East 38th Ave 63.0 East 32nd Parkway Smith Road 62.7 62.0 Smith Road 59.0 70 Open Space Norfolk Sand Creek Glen Park 60.0 61.0 Colfax Avenue Airport Boulevard Chambers Road 58.1 58.0 Springhill Golf Course 57.2 57.0 225 6th Avenue 6th Avenue Del Mar Havana Street Park W Tollgate CreekE Tollgate Creek 56.0 52.3 52.0 52.8 51.5 51.0 53.0 53.3 Delaney High Line Farms Park 55.0 50.4 Aurora Hills Golf Club 54.0 Alameda Avenue 54.4 50.0 Aurora 54.1 Peoria Street Aurora Dayton Street Mall West Sable Blvd Municipal Tollgate 49.8 Complex Creek Expo Park Trails Creek Trail Westerly 48.0 Windsor Lake 49.2 47.5 49.0 Mississippi Avenue 47.2 47.0 Parker Road Cherry Creek Trail Quebec Street 46.0 Holly Street Iliff Avenue 25 Cherry Creek Colorado Blvd 43.0 40.0 42.0 Trail 45.0 Cherry Creek 40.5 Golf Club Yale Avenue 39.0 38.6 S Forest Monoco Parkway 43.5 44.3 Eisenhower 44.0 Park Cherry Creek Yosemite Street Yosemite Bible 37.8 44.1 Trail 37.0 38.1 41.0 Park 37.9 38.0 Wellshire Golf 37.2 Course Holly Street S Monroe St Hampden Avenue E Jefferson Ave 36.0 Dahlia St 35.5 25 35.0 Three 34.5 Ponds Park Quincy Ave 34.1 Cherry Hills 34.0 Village Trails 33.6 University Blvd 33.0 Blackmer Commons Cherry Hills 32.5 Village Trails Belleview Avenue 30.5 Holly St 32.0 Little Dry Creek 26.7 27.0 31.5 30.0 31.0 27.6 Greenwood 26.3 Gulch Trail 29.5 28.0 Orchard Road 26.0 Orchard Road Big Dry Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Cherry Creek Basin
    6.2 Cherry Creek The Cherry Creek Mall Map Unit is comprised of a Basin Snapshot single basin (4600-02) from the Denver Storm Drainage Master Plan (SDMP) and has a total drainage area of Overall Score 62 approximately 2,930 acres or 4.6 square miles. Cherry Primary Sub-Score 52 Creek flows north through Denver to its confluence with Highest Primary Average annual pollutant loads Sub-Scores • Phosphorous (5/6) the South Platte River and is generally bounded by E. 6th • Nitrogen (5/6) Ave on the north, Colorado Blvd on the east, E. Arizona • Bacteria (5/6) Ave on the south, and N. Broadway on the west. The Monitoring • Nitrogen (4/4) entire map unit is within the City & County of Denver. • Phosphorous (3/4) The Cherry Creek Mall Map Unit basin is fully developed, Impervious Area w/in ROW (4/5) Existing % Treated (10/10) primarily with residential land uses but also includes the Cherry Creek Mall and the Denver Country Club as major Secondary Sub-Score 10 land users near the center of the Map Unit. Cherry Creek Highest Secondary Park Density (3/5) through the Denver Country Club is privately maintained Sub-Scores but includes five drop structures to help stabilize the creek and prevent bank erosion which can impair downstream There are over 50 individual outfalls to Cherry Creek reaches. Upstream of University Ave the banks have varying in size from 12-in RCP to 96-in x 60-in RCBC. been stabilized with soil rip-rap while still allowing the A number of these outfalls can be seen from the Cherry low flow channel to meander within the defined banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Regulation #72. Cherry Creek Reservoir Control
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Commission CHERRY CREEK RESERVOIR CONTROL REGULATION 5 CCR 1002-72 ADOPTED: November 6, 1985 EFFECTIVE: December 30, 1989 AMENDED: May 1, 1989 EFFECTIVE: June 30, 1989 AMENDED: June 1, 1992 EFFECTIVE: June 30, 1992 AMENDED: August 14, 1995 EFFECTIVE: September 30, 1995 AMENDED: July 14, 1997 EFFECTIVE: August 30, 1997 TRIENNIAL: September 9, 1997 AMENDED: November 3, 1997 EFFECTIVE: December 30, 1997 EMERGENCY AMENDED: January 12, 1998 AMENDED: April 13, 1998 EFFECTIVE: May 30, 1998 TRIENNIAL: March 14, 2000 AMENDED: August 13, 2001 EFFECTIVE: September 30, 2001 TRIENNIAL: September 8, 2003 AMENDED: November 8, 2004 EFFECTIVE: December 30, 2004 AMENDED: August 10, 2009 EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2010 AMENDED: October 9, 2012 EFFECTIVE: November 30, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Commission CHERRY CREEK RESERVOIR CONTROL REGULATION 5 CCR 1002-72 72.1 AUTHORITY The Water Quality Control Commission is authorized to promulgate this Control Regulation pursuant to sections 25-8-202(1)(c) and 25-8-205, C.R.S. 72.2 DEFINITIONS See the Colorado Water Quality Control Act and other Water Quality Control Commission regulations for additional definitions. 1. "Authority" means the Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority established pursuant to section 25-8.5-101, et seq., C.R.S. 2. "Background sources" include concentrations to the reservoir that are not the result of human- related activities, such as groundwater in its natural condition and precipitation on the reservoir. 3. "Best management practice (BMP)" means the best schedules of activities, prohibitions or practices, operation and maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the introduction of pollutants into state waters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban and Architectural History of Denver, Colorado by Caitlin Anne Milligan
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Graduate School of Architecture & Urban Design Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Design Theses Fall 12-2015 Gold, Iron, and Stone: The rbU an and Architectural History of Denver, Colorado Caitlin A. Milligan Samfox School of Design and Visual Arts Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/samfox_arch_etds Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Milligan, Caitlin A., "Gold, Iron, and Stone: The rU ban and Architectural History of Denver, Colorado" (2015). Graduate School of Architecture & Urban Design Theses. 2. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/samfox_arch_etds/2 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Design at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate School of Architecture & Urban Design Theses by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Architecture and Architectural History Thesis Examination Committee: Dr. Eric Mumford, Chair Dr. Robert Moore Gold, Iron, and Stone The Urban and Architectural History of Denver, Colorado by Caitlin Anne Milligan A thesis presented to the Graduate School of Design & Visual Arts of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architectural Studies (Concentration: the History
    [Show full text]
  • Cherry Creek
    CHERRY CREEK 3 c f-\U(~CJ <:-«,::T(,:, -v- ~. :- r' .\ .. ' -~ mUTED STAT';;S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Iokes, Secretary BUREAU OF RECIAHATION John C. Page, Commissioner R. F. Walter. Chief' Engineer E. B. Debler, Hydraulic Engineer REPORT on .\ i CRERRY CREEK PROJECT-COLORADO ! J By f / A. H. Thompson-Engineer. April-1938• j, ; I Roservoir oporntion and nnintennnoe. together with over- head oosts for oolleotion of project costs nnd distribution of ,~ter, are' estimated at $1.00 per aore vdth the Castlewood dovelop­ ment and $1.25 per aore with the smaller Cherry Creek Reservoir development, leaving 82.50 and ~2.25 per acre per year, respeotively to apply on oonstruotion oosts. ' On this basis. assuming a forty year repayment period vdthout interest,' the investment results are as follows: :Castlewood:Cherry Croek:Cherry Croek :Reservoir t Resorvoir : Reservoir with :with flood :vdthout full flood con-s oontrol :flood oontro1 ( trol Denver vms first settled in 1857 and since then there huve been a number of damaging floods in Cherry Creek of whioh those of 1864 und 1933, are outstunding. The 1864 flood did heavy damage to a small town; the 1933 flood due in purt to fail- ure of the Castlewood Dam. resulted in tangible damagoa of i $1,000,000 and undeterwined intangible damages. The Kenvrood flood I oontrol dam, oonstruoted sinoe 1933, was intended to oontrol floods of 100 ye~r or less frequenoy, to puss them safely through the ( Denver floodwny channeI of 10,000 second feet capacity. Larger floods would not be so oontrolled.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of the Records of the Colorado Historical Society 1300
    An Inventory of the Records of the CJIBRRY CRBBK SBftiJOfBll'rS (1858-1860) Collection HUmber 190 a holding of the Stephen H. Hart Library Processed by Lloyd Gundy Colorado Historical Society 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203 Copyright 1991, All Rights Reserved Tab1e of contents Introduction to the Collection . 1 Chronology . 5 Collection Contents • . • . 10 Towns, Associations, and Companies . ~ . 10 Individuals . 10 Cross-Reference Index to the Collection • • • • • • • • • • 16 The production of this finding aid consisted of over 1,400 entries to produce a virtual census of the Cherry Creek settlements. The Colorado Historical Society gratefully acknowledges the help of two of its volunteers who prepared this guide for publication, Joyce Powell and Jon Gilbertson. Introduction to the Co11ection ·- The Cherry Creek Settlements Collection at the Colorado Historical Society represents an important era in the early development of Denver and the Front Range. .Consisting of approximately 7000 pieces, the documents and scraps of legal paper found within are attest to the early settlers need to record legal transactions and claims during the years 1858 through 1860. Hundreds of these quasi-legal papers were filed with the courts from the approximate year of white settlement in the Cherry Creek area (1858) through the year of Colorado becoming a territory (1861). Claims to land in the area were illegal so far as the Native American Indian tribes were concerned until the Treaty of Fort Wise, 18 February, 1861, took away their land except for an area generally in the southeastern quadrant of Colorado Territory. As a provision of the treaty, the city of Denver and adjacent towns were to pay the Arapahoes and Cheyennes $1.25 per acre.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Management Framework
    “By perceiving ourselves as part of the river, we take responsibility for the river as a whole.” ~ Vaclav Havel Long Range Management Framework South Platte River Corridor 00088 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Managers Other Participants: Bar Chadwick Mayor’s South Platte River Denver Water Department Commission Ed Pokorney Marc Alston USEPA Don Kennedy Project Consultants City Attorney’s Office Beth Conover Headwaters Consulting, LLC Patrick Wheeler Marty Zeller Conservation Partners, Inc. Karen Aviles Graphic Design Denver Environmental Health Julie Connor Denver Community Planning and Maureen Dudley Development Agency Commissioners Colorado Division of Wildlife Jay Skinner Co-Chairs: Vicki Vargas-Madrid Mayor Wellington Webb Joe Blake Metro Chamber of Commerce Urban Drainage and Flood Chips Barry Denver Water Department Control District Barbara Biggs Metro Wastewater Ben Urbonas BJ Brooks Denver Parks & Recreation Bryan Kohlenberg Tim Carey Army Corps of Engineers Wastewater Management Division, Casey Davenhill Audubon Society Denver Public Works Raylene Decatur Denver Museum of Nature Terry Baus & Science Denver City Council Staff Max Dodson USEPA Region 8 Shelley Smith Theresa Donahue Denver Environmental Health Kim Kucera Ellen Fisher Gates Family Foundation Stephanie Foote Denver Public Works Denver Community Planning and D. Grover Strive/Ready-To-Work Development Agency Patrick Hamill Oakwood Homes Ken Brewer Duane Holmes National Park Service Denver Parks & Recreation Mike Kinsey Urban Wildlife Chad Anderson Stan Macintyre Inter-Neighborhood
    [Show full text]
  • The South Platte: an Urban River and Critical Watershed
    Keywords: community engagement, The South Platte: an Urban education & outreach - public, Federal Partnership, green infrastructure, River and Critical Watershed monitoring, partnerships, public health, Like many American cities, Denver grew up on the banks of its local restoration, water quality, youth river, the South Platte. In May 1858, in Cheyenne and Arapaho About the Organizations: territory, a small party of settlers set off the Colorado Gold Rush when they turned up gold at the mouth of Little Dry Creek. The resulting trading and mining encampment, located at the confluence of the South Platte River and Cherry Creek, is now marked by the sprawling The mission of Groundwork Denver is to Confluence Park, nestled in the heart of Denver and offering a variety bring about the sustained improvement of recreation opportunities for city dwellers, including biking, of the physical environment and promote kayaking, and fishing. health and well-being through community-based partnerships and The Platte’s headwaters action. emerge in the South Park highland meadow basin, then flow north and east through several major reservoirs. Just after entering the Chatfield Water Education Colorado is the leading Reservoir and State Park, it organization for informing and engaging Coloradans on water. Through flows through the outlying community membership, leadership cities of Littleton and training, educational resources and Englewood before entering programming, we ensure Coloradans are Denver city limits. By the both knowledgeable about key water time it reaches the Confluence issues and equipped to make smart at Denver’s heart, it has decisions for a sustainable water future. already picked up a number of pollutants from point and non- Contact Information: point sources, including Cindy Chang stormwater runoff from Groundwork Denver nearby buildings.
    [Show full text]