Clinical Evaluation of 99Mtc-Rituximab for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical Evaluation of 99Mtc-Rituximab for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients Clinical Evaluation of 99mTc-Rituximab for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients Nan Li*1, Xuejuan Wang*1, Baohe Lin1, Hua Zhu1, Cheng Liu1, Xiaobao Xu1, Yan Zhang1, Shizhen Zhai1, Tao OuYang2, Jinfeng Li2, and Zhi Yang1 1Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China; and 2Breast Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China The metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) might be the Accurate lymph node (LN) staging is essential for the prog- most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. In this paper, we nosis and treatment of cancer patients. The term sentinel lymph 99m report to our knowledge the first study of Tc-rituximab as a node (SLN) is defined as the first node or nodes in the lymphatic radiotracer for imaging of SLNs using lymphoscintigraphy in both pre- drainage of the primary tumor and was so named by Gould et al. operative and intraoperative breast cancer patients. Methods: 99mTc- rituximab was designed as an SLN tracer targeting the CD20 antigen, in 1960 (1). In 1977, Cabanas suggested that the SLN would be which expresses extensively in LNs. A retrospective study was per- predictive of metastatic spread to the respective regional lym- formed on 2,317 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent phatic basins (2). SLN mapping also enables surgeons to perform lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Before a minimally invasive biopsy of the SLN and to completely resect imaging, all patients were administered a preoperative peritumoral in- all SLNs, and in the past 2 decades, the detection and biopsy of jection of 37 MBq of 99mTc-rituximab. Results: 99mTc-rituximab was SLNs have already been implemented in the surgical treatment of synthesized in both high radiolabeling yield and high radiochemical breast cancer and malignant melanoma patients (3,4). purity ( 95%), with molecular integrity and immune activity well main- Visual examination with blue dyes and lymphoscintigraphy has tained. The initial study of 100 breast cancer patients showed that the been extensively used for SLN mapping in the clinic (5). Isosulfan success rate of SLN lymphoscintigraphy by injection of 99mTc-rituximab, as compared with SLNB, was 100%, and the sensitivity, specificity, blue and methylene blue are 2 commonly used blue dyes in the accuracy, and false negative rate were 97.4%, 100%, 98.0%, and SLN biopsy of breast cancer. Actually, methylene blue is the most 2.60%, respectively. Of the following 2,217 patients studied, the suc- commonly used SLN mapping agent in China. However, the cess rate of lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB was 98.8% and 99.9%, small-molecule blue dyes migrate rapidly in the lymphatics, and and the average number of SLN was 1.78 (range, 1–10) and 2.85 the retention of dye in SLNs is poor (,5 min) (6). So, it is – (range, 1 15). Age was an independent predictor of the number of essential for surgeons to locate and remove the SLNs quickly SLNs identified by lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative handheld before the dye spreads to other nodes. Moreover, the blue dyes γ-probe (P , 0.05), and other factors—such as sex, imaging time, primary tumor site, histopathologic subtype, clinical T stage, and may also cause unwanted anaphylactic side effects and cause blue immunochemistry—were not (P . 0.05). However, the SLN metastatic discoloration of urine, stool, and skin in some patients (7). For rates were different in patients with different histopathologic subtype, lymphoscintigraphy, a variety of radiopharmaceuticals has been clinical T stage, and immunochemistry (P , 0.05). Conclusion: Here used including the filtered and unfiltered 99mTc-sulfur colloid, we report the first study of the new radiotracer 99mTc-rituximab for 99mTc-labeled albumin-based colloids, and 99mTc-antimony trisul- breast cancer lymphoscintigraphy. This tracer showed great feasibility, fide colloid. For all these colloid-based imaging techniques, SLN safety, and effectiveness for SLN mapping in breast cancer patients. visualization depends on the transport of the radiolabeled particles Key Words: 99mTc-rituximab; sentinel lymph node mapping; breast from the injection site to SLNs through lymphatic channels (8). cancer; lymphoscintigraphy The radiolabeled particles are then trapped in the node and J Nucl Med 2016; 57:1214–1220 absorbed by macrophages. The detection rate of these 99mTc DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160572 radiopharmaceuticals (range, 86%–99%) (9,10) is mainly caused by many factors, such as particle size, particle concentration, and injection dose, that can influence the transport and accumulation process of the tracer (11–13). In 2013, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved 99m Received May 14, 2015; revision accepted Feb. 18, 2016. Lymphoseek ( Tc-tilmanocept; Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, For correspondence or reprints contact either of the following: Inc.) as the radiotracer for detecting SLN in breast cancer and Nan Li, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Cancer Hospital, No. 52 Fucheng Rd., Beijing, 100142, China. melanoma patients (14,15). The success of Lymphoseek encour- E-mail: [email protected] ages us to report other receptor-targeted SLN imaging agents. Zhi Yang, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Cancer Hospital, No. 52 Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against the CD20 Fucheng Rd., Beijing, 100142, China. E-mail: [email protected] antigen presenting on the membrane of pre-B and mature B lym- *Contributed equally to this work. phocytes. It was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in Published online Mar. 16, 2016. COPYRIGHT © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular 1997 to treat B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas resistant to chemo- Imaging, Inc. therapy regimens (16,17). Considering there are a large number of 1214 THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE • Vol. 57 • No. 8 • August 2016 TABLE 1 with daily quality control. Each patient was injected with 37 MBq Quality Control of 99mTc-Rituximab for Clinical Application (1.0 mCi) of 99mTc-rituximab. Parameter QC specification QC result Lymphatic Mapping Protocol Guided by ultrasound, all patients were administered peritumoral Appearance Clear, colorless Pass subcutaneous injections of 99mTc-rituximab (37.0 MBq, 0.5 mL) 2–18 h Volume 0.5–1.0 mL 0.5 mL before biopsy. In lymphoscintigraphy, 3 point sources (0.37 MBq) were put on the surface of the patient to mark the sternal notch, Injection dose 18.5–37 MBq 37 MBq contralateral sternal margin, and metasternum location as references. pH 4.0–8.0 7.0 Planar lymphoscintigraphy was then acquired by a SPECT system Radio–thin-layer .95% .99% (Siemens; E.Cam) with the patient positioned supine in the anterior chromatography view and the ipsilateral lateral view, to determine the location and Radio–high-performance .95% .99% number of SLNs (Supplemental Figs. 4–8). Acquisition parameters liquid chromatography Ethanol ,5% 0 TABLE 2 Endotoxins ,15 EU/mL Pass Clinical Pathologic Characteristics of 100 Breast Cancer Sterility Sterile Pass Patients Specific activity 111 GBq/μmol Pass Characteristic No. of patients Sex B cells presenting in LNs, we hypothesized that radiolabeled rituximab can serve as an effective imaging tool for SLN identi- Female 100 fication. Therefore, in this work rituximab was directly labeled Age (y) with the most widely used SPECT radionuclide, 99mTc. The resul- #50 49 99m tant tracer, Tc-rituxmab, was further evaluated in a large cohort .50 51 of breast cancer patients (total no. of patients 5 2,317). Here the Left or right side breast cancer feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of using 99mTc-rituxmab for clinical imaging of SLN were reported. Left 45 Right 55 MATERIALS AND METHODS Imaging time after injection of tracer – Patients 2 4h 28 The criterion for inclusion and exclusion of patients meets standard 16–18 h 72 SLN biopsy criteria (supplemental materials [available at http://jnm. Primary tumor location snmjournals.org]). The clinical trial was approved by Peking Univer- Upper inner quadrant 26 sity Cancer Hospital & Institute. From July 2005 to June 2011, pa- tients with breast cancer were recruited at Peking University Cancer Lower inner quadrant 7 Hospital & Institute. The patients’ informed consent was obtained Upper outer quadrant 49 before the tests. SLN imaging was performed in 2,317 breast cancer Lower outer quadrant 16 99m patients using Tc-rituximab followed by SLN biopsy to verify the Central portion 2 imaging results. Histopathologic type Radiotracer Preparation Invasive ductal carcinoma 88 99m Tc radiolabeling of rituximab and radio–high-performance liq- Invasive lobular carcinoma 4 uid chromatography analysis was performed as described (Supple- Other 8 mental Figs. 1–3). Briefly, rituximab (10 mg, 70 nmol) was dissolved in 1 mL of phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7.4, 10 mM), and 0.3 mL Clinical T stage of the solution were taken out to react with 25 mL of 10% (V/V) Tis 1 2-mercaptoethanol for 15 min in the dark. The product was then purified T1 25 by a PD-10 column to obtain 2 mL of reduced rituximab, the solution T2 65 was divided into 0.2 mL for each vial, and the samples were stored at 220°C for further use. When radiolabeling was performed, 0.2 mL of T3 9 solution of reduced rituximab was warmed to room temperature and ER/PR/HER2 added to 10 mL of glucoheptonic acid (100 mg/mL), 15 mL of SnCl2 1/1/1 23 99m (1 mg/mL), and 370–470 MBq of Na TcO4. The reaction mixture −/−/1 11 was shaken at room temperature for 10 min. 99mTc-rituximab was 1/−/− or −/1/− or 1/1/− 49 then purified by a PD-10 column. For clinical use, the radiochemical purity of the tracer was always . 99% tested by radio–thin-layer 1/−/1 or −/1/1 11 chromatography and radio–high-performance liquid chromatography.
Recommended publications
  • The Landmark Series: Axillary Management in Breast Cancer
    Ann Surg Oncol (2020) 27:724–729 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08154-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE – BREAST ONCOLOGY The Landmark Series: Axillary Management in Breast Cancer Carla S. Fisher, MD1, Julie A. Margenthaler, MD2, Kelly K. Hunt, MD3, and Theresa Schwartz, MD4 1Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; 2Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; 3Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 4Department of Surgery, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO ABSTRACT The evolution in axillary management for AXILLARY MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS patients with breast cancer has resulted in multiple dra- UNDERGOING PRIMARY SURGICAL THERAPY matic changes over the past several decades. The end result has been an overall deescalation of surgery in the axilla. For many patients with breast cancer, surgery is the first Landmark trials that have formed the basis for the current line of therapy for treatment and staging. When the Halsted treatment guidelines are reviewed herein. radical mastectomy was introduced, the axilla was seen as a transit point between the breast and distant metastatic disease, and it was believed that removal of axillary nodes Axillary management for patients with newly diagnosed was necessary to prevent distant metastatic spread. As breast cancer has undergone several practice-changing understanding of breast cancer evolved, removal of these paradigm shifts over the last few decades with the ultimate lymph nodes was not viewed as a necessary procedure to goal of reducing morbidity without compromising onco- prevent spread but rather an important component of breast logic outcomes or staging.
    [Show full text]
  • About Mastectomy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
    All About Mastectomy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy One of the most important goals of Moffitt Cancer Center is to provide you with quality patient care through education, research and patient care. The following information has been developed to help you understand the mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures for which you have been scheduled. Members of your health care team will review this information with you and answer any questions that you may have. Definitions: Mastectomy – Removal of the entire breast but not the muscles underneath. Lymph Nodes - Small bean shaped glands found in the armpit. They remove waste and fluids from the arm and breast and help fight infection. They are also call lymph glands. Sentinel Lymph Node - The first place breast cancer may metastasize (or spread) is to lymph nodes in the axilla (underarm area) on the side of the body where the cancer is. The first lymph node(s) are referred to as the sentinel lymph node(s) or the “gate keepers”. These nodes are first biopsied to determine if the cancer has spread. If cancer cells are not found in the sentinel lymph node(s) that were removed, it will not be necessary to remove the remaining lymph nodes in the arm pit. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy - This procedure is a two step process. Performing the sentinel lymph node biopsy requires a small incision in your axilla. In the first step, the doctor injects a radioactive substance and/ or blue dye in the area around the tumor. Lymphatic channels (like blood vessels) carry these materials to the sentinel lymph node.
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus Guideline on the Management of the Axilla in Patients with Invasive/In-Situ Breast Cancer
    - Official Statement - Consensus Guideline on the Management of the Axilla in Patients With Invasive/In-Situ Breast Cancer Purpose To outline the management of the axilla for patients with invasive and in-situ breast cancer. Associated ASBrS Guidelines or Quality Measures 1. Performance and Practice Guidelines for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients – Revised November 25, 2014 2. Performance and Practice Guidelines for Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients – Approved November 25, 2014 3. Quality Measure: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Invasive Breast Cancer – Approved November 4, 2010 4. Prior Position Statement: Management of the Axilla in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer – Approved August 31, 2011 Methods A literature review inclusive of recent randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of sentinel lymph node surgery and axillary lymph node dissection for invasive and in-situ breast cancer as well as the pathologic review of sentinel lymph nodes and indications for axillary radiation was performed. This is not a complete systematic review but rather, a comprehensive review of recent relevant literature. A focused review of non-randomized controlled trials was then performed to develop consensus guidance on management of the axilla in scenarios where randomized controlled trials data is lacking. The ASBrS Research Committee developed a consensus document, which was reviewed and approved by the ASBrS Board of Directors. Summary of Data Reviewed Recommendations Based on Randomized Controlled
    [Show full text]
  • Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Examination by the OSNA
    cells Article Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Examination by the OSNA Method in Lung Cancer Patients—Comparison with the Standard Histopathological Procedure Josef Vodicka 1 , Martin Pesta 2,3,*, Vlastimil Kulda 4 , Katerina Houfkova 2, Bohuslava Vankova 5, Jakub Sebek 1, Martin Skala 1, Jakub Fichtl 1, Kristyna Prochazkova 1 and Ondrej Topolcan 6 1 Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Plzen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic; [email protected] (J.V.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (M.S.); fi[email protected] (J.F.); [email protected] (K.P.) 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Plzen, Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Plzen, Czech Republic 4 Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Karlovarska 48, 301 66 Plzen, Czech Republic; [email protected] 5 Department of Pathology, Faculty Hospital Plzen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Edvarda Benese 13, 305 99 Plzen, Czech Republic; [email protected] 6 Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, Faculty Hospital Plzen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Edvarda Benese 13, 305 99 Plzen, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-377-593-261 Received: 26 October 2020; Accepted: 1 December 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Abstract: The aim of the study was to compare the prognostic significance of lymph node status of patients with lung cancer analyzed by three different methods: hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), immunohistochemistry of cytokeratin 19 (IHC CK19), and One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA).
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Update on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma Ane Gerda Z Eriksson 1,2,* , Ben Davidson 2,3, Pernille Bjerre Trent 1,2, Brynhildur Eyjólfsdóttir 1, Gunn Fallås Dahl 1, Yun Wang 1 and Anne Cathrine Staff 2,4 1 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] (P.B.T.); [email protected] (B.E.); [email protected] (G.F.D.); [email protected] (Y.W.) 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] (B.D.); [email protected] (A.C.S.) 3 Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway 4 Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, N-0424 Oslo, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has emerged as an alternative staging approach in women with assumed early-stage endometrial carcinoma. Through image-guided surgery and pathologic ultrastaging, the SLN approach is introducing “precision medicine” to the surgical management of gynecologic cancers, providing a comprehensive evaluation of high-yield lymph nodes. This approach improves the surgeons’ ability to detect small-volume metastatic disease while reducing intraoperative and postoperative morbidity associated with lymphadenectomy. Although the majority of clinicians in Europe and the USA have recognized the value of SLN biopsy in endometrial carcinoma and introduced this as part of clinical practice, there is ongoing debate Citation: Eriksson, A.G.Z; Davidson, regarding its role in very low-risk patients as well as in patients at high risk of nodal metastasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Lymph Node Biopsy Results for Desmoplastic Malignant Melanoma
    THERAPEUTICS FOR THE CLINICIAN Lymph Node Biopsy Results for Desmoplastic Malignant Melanoma Deborah L. Cummins, MD; Clemens Esche, MD; Terry L. Barrett, MD; Charles M. Balch, MD; Mona Mofid, MD Desmoplastic malignant melanoma (DMM) is a by fascicles of atypical spindle-shaped cells, bands rare variant of melanoma with distinct histopatho- of fibrosis, and poorly defined margins.2 Clinically, logic and clinical features. Compared with other the lesions commonly have a benign appearance. melanomas, the desmoplastic variant demon- Firm and scarlike, the lesions often are amelanotic.3 strates a greater frequency of local recurrence The bland clinical appearance and difficult histology and a proclivity for tracking along nerves, but it oftentimes delay the correct diagnosis. At the time poses a lower risk of distant metastases. Elective of diagnosis, the lesions generally are quite deep, lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node with reports of median tumor thickness ranging biopsy (SLNB) are commonly used tools for deter- from 2.5 to 6.5 mm deep.4,5 Most DMM cases are mining prognosis in thick melanomas. The role Clark level IV or V.6 of these procedures for DMM remains unclear. The natural history and pattern of spread of DMM This study was designed to characterize DMM differs somewhat from other melanomas. Local recur- and determine the frequency of histologically rence and extension to adjoining areas is common. positive lymph nodes in patients with DMM. This The tumor also has a particular affinity for invading retrospective chart review included patients with nerves.7 In contrast, distant spread is less common DMM treated by Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) than in other melanomas in spite of the greater thick- physicians between 1998 and 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Melanoma Understanding Melanoma First Edition
    EDUCATION Understanding Melanoma Understanding Melanoma First edition Developed by Allina Health. © 2019 Allina Health System The publisher believes that information in this manual was accurate at the time the manual was published. However, because of the rapidly changing state of scientific and medical knowledge, some of the facts and recommendations in the manual may be out-of-date by the time you read it. Your health care provider is the best source for current information and medical advice in your particular situation. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without permission in writing from the publisher. Disclaimer This publication is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. The information it contains cannot be used to diagnose medical conditions or prescribe treatment. The information provided is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient and his/her existing physician. For specific information about your health condition, please contact your health care provider. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction Introduction …………………………………………………………………… 7 Your Health Care Team ……………………………………………………… 7 Your Skin ……………………………………………………………………… 9 Chapter 2: Melanoma Risk Factors ………………………………………………………………… 13 Signs of Melanoma ………………………………………………………… 14 Biopsy ……………………………………………………………………… 14 Pathology Report …………………………………………………………… 14 Additional
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Evaluation of 99Mtc-Rituximab for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine, published on March 16, 2016 as doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.160572 Clinical Evaluation of 99mTc-Rituximab for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients Nan Li1,#, Xuejuan Wang1,#, Baohe Lin1, Hua Zhu1, Cheng Liu1, Xiaobao Xu1, Yan Zhang1, Shizhen Zhai1, Tao OuYang2, Jinfeng Li2, Zhi Yang1 Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, 2Breast Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China Running title: 99mTc-Rituximab for SLN Mapping Nan Li# , E-mail: [email protected] Xuejuan Wang#, E-mail: [email protected] # These two authors contributed to this study equally For correspondence to: Nan Li, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Cancer Hospital, No 52 Fucheng Rd, Beijing, 100142, China. E-mail: [email protected] Zhi Yang, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Cancer Hospital, No 52 Fucheng Rd, Beijing, 100142, China. Email: [email protected] Word counts: 4887 1 ABSTRACT The metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) might be the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. In this paper, we report the first study of 99mTc-Rituximab as a radiotracer for imaging of SLN using lymphoscintigraphy in both preoperative and intra-operative breast cancer patients. Method: 99mTc-Rituximab was designed as a novel SLN tracer targeting the CD20 antigen which expresses extensively in lymph nodes. A retrospective study was performed on 2317 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent the lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB (sentinel lymph node biopsy). Before imaging, all patients had preoperative peritumoral injection of 37 MBq of 99mTc-rituximab. Results: 99mTc-rituximab was synthesized in both high radiolabeling yield and high radiochemical purity (> 95%), with molecular integrity and immune activity well maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Fast Molecular Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA)
    cancers Article Evaluation of Fast Molecular Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Svenja Engels 1, Lutz Brautmeier 1, Lena Reinhardt 1, Clara Wasylow 1, Friederike Hasselmann 1, Rolf P. Henke 2, Friedhelm Wawroschek 1 and Alexander Winter 1,* 1 University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; [email protected] (S.E.); [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (C.W.); [email protected] (F.H.); [email protected] (F.W.) 2 Oldenburg Institute of Pathology, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer and one of the highest- causes of cancer deaths among men. The presence of lymph node metastases (LNM) is the strongest prognostic factor. Histological detection of LNM is the gold standard for LN staging. In clinical prac- tice, only fractions of LNs are examined histopathologically, resulting in missed (micro-)metastases. Citation: Engels, S.; Brautmeier, L.; Biomolecular techniques can enhance the identification of LNM but are not routinely used because of Reinhardt, L.; Wasylow, C.; high cost. One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) analyzes the entire LN by detecting cytoker- Hasselmann, F.; Henke, R.P.; atin 19 mRNA as a surrogate for LNM requiring less effort and allowing intraoperative application. Wawroschek, F.; Winter, A. Evaluation To verify the reliability of OSNA for the first time in PCa, we examined LNs of patients undergoing of Fast Molecular Detection of Lymph prostatectomy and sentinel lymphadenectomy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radiation Oncologist's Guide to Axillary Management in Breast
    Current Breast Cancer Reports (2019) 11:293–302 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-019-00330-6 CLINICAL TRIALS (JE LANG, SECTION EDITOR) A Radiation Oncologist’s Guide to Axillary Management in Breast Cancer: a Walk Through the Trials Julie K. Jang1 & Elana R. Sverdlik2 & Naomi R. Schechter1 Published online: 14 September 2019 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review The axilla is the most common site for breast cancer nodal metastases. Aggressive management includes axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), radiotherapy, and systemic therapy, but carries the risks of lymphedema and “over- treatment”. We review the clinical trials that led to de-escalation of axillary management and their nuances that are often overlooked. Recent Findings With the rise of sentinel lymph node biopsy, several trials conclude that ALND can be omitted in specific populations. However, the subtleties in those trials, such as the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, have yet to be clarified. These discussions carry forward into the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, where ongoing trials investigate who needs ALND and/or radiation. Summary This review examines the clinical trials that form the standard of care, and highlights why axillary management is individualized today. Keywords Axilla . Radiotherapy . Breast cancer . Axillary lymph node dissection . Sentinel lymph node biopsy . Lymph node metastasis Introduction received radiation to a “third field,” the supraclavicular/axillary apex region (SCV). This SCV region was, and still is difficult to In the early 2000s, survival rates for breast cancer patients were manage surgically, due to proximity of the axillary vessels and excellent—approximately 95% 5-year disease-specific survival the brachial plexus.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Nodal Failure Rate with Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node Positive Breast Cancer M
    Low Nodal Failure Rate with Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node Positive Breast Cancer M. Piltin, T. Hoskin, C. Day, J. Davis, J. Boughey Introduction Objectives • As chemotherapic agents improve, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is expanding. • Evaluate the use of SLN • The feasibility of SLN surgery after NAC in cN+ disease has surgery versus ALND after been proven in three large prospective trials: ACOSOG Z1071, neoadjuvant chemotherapy SENTINA SN FNAC. • Evaluate variables associated • Use of SLN surgery after NAC has comparable false negative rates to what we accept for traditional SLN surgery in the with surgical decision making surgery-first setting. • Report oncologic outcomes • Since the publication of these trials, there has been an increase in the clinical use of SLN surgery after NAC for clinically node positive patients. However, limited outcomes data regarding the oncologic safety of utilizing this technique is available. ©2019 MFMER | slide-1 cN3 cN2 7.0% Methods Results 3.1% • Evaluated patients from 2009-2019 at • 602 patients cN1 our institution - Mayo Clinic • 541 cN1 89.9 Rochester • 19 cN2 % • 42 cN3 • Divided cohort into historical (2009- • Median patient age 51 (range: 24-86) 2014) and contemporary (2015-2019) practice to allow for assessment of • Tumor biology clinical practice after implementation 20.7% ER+/HER2- (278) of Z1071 data ER+/HER2+ (123) 12.6% 46.2% Inclusion Exclusion ER-/HER2+ (76) 20.5% • cN1-N3 • Inflammatory ER-/HER2- (125) • Biopsy • Stage IV proven nodal
    [Show full text]
  • STORE ADDENDUM February 13, 2020
    STORE ADDENDUM February 13, 2020 Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Lymphovascular Invasion ......................................................................................................................... 4 Lymphovascular Invasion ......................................................................................................................... 5 Phase I, II, and III Dose Per Fraction, Total Dose, Treatment Modality ...................................................... 6 Phase I, II, and III Radiation Treatment Modality ...................................................................................... 7 Phase I, II, and III Radiation Treatment Modality ...................................................................................... 8 Date of First Course Treatment/Palliative Care ........................................................................................ 9 Cancer Status, Date of Last Cancer (tumor) Status and Date of Last Cancer (tumor) Status Flag ............. 10 CTR Guide to Coding Radiation Therapy................................................................................................. 12 Phase I, II, and III Radiation Primary Treatment Volume......................................................................... 13 Phase I, II, and III Radiation Primary Treatment Volume........................................................................
    [Show full text]