DOCSLIB.ORG

Keynote Speech by Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Keynote Speech by Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič On European Commission - Speech [Check Against Delivery] Keynote speech by Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič on "EU-UK relations after Brexit" at the Mario Soares Promotion Closing Ceremony, College of Europe Bruges, 18 June 2021 Thank you very much, dear Lukáš (Dravecký) – srdečne ďakujem! It is truly an honour to be introduced by a fellow Slovak, representing a new generation of Europeans and the future of our Union. Dear Rector, Federica Mogherini, Dear Mayor, Dirk De Fauw, Dear Directors of Studies, Dear Professors, Distinguished guests, And most importantly, dear students of the prestigious College of Europe, It is a privilege to be here, in the magnificent city of Bruges, for the Mario Soares Promotion closing ceremony. When I learnt that this year's promotion was dedicated to the father of Portuguese democracy, I was thrilled. Mario Soares is an example of vision, and resilience. He relentlessly opposed dictatorship, fought for the freedom of his country and its people, and led them into the forerunner of today's European Union. As someone who lived a great part of his youth behind a barbed wire fence – Churchill's infamous Iron Curtain – I can truly relate. When retiring from politics, Mario Soares said: “If I had been living in a democracy – instead of spending thirty-two years in and out of jail, running from the police and conspiring in secret – I could have achieved a lot more for Portugal.” What a Statesman! What an inspiration! Dear students, I know that you too find inspiration, and a moral compass, from the great Europeans of our history. Though our continent's political, economic and social landscape has changed profoundly – out of the fences and division of the past has come today's unity, and solidarity – I know that all of you will give your best to carry on the torch for your countries and the European Union. I always find it uplifting to be at the College of Europe – a living “microcosm” of our European Union, or even a “Fab Lab” for future generations of Europeans. I know that the College of Europe is a place of hard work and dedication. But it is also a place of life- changing experiences, explorations and discovery – where bridges are built across cultures and languages. With this in mind, I want to congratulate all the students of the Mario Soares promotion for carrying on with their studies in this most difficult – and yet highly formative – year. * Every age has its own challenges. Today, we are picking up the pieces in the aftermath of a global pandemic, even as the world continues to change at an unprecedented pace and scale. Humanity's ecological footprint has led to the global climate emergency. The worldwide race for technological leadership is set to transform our economic models and our societies – bringing a sense of uncertainty. The age of disinformation, combined with persisting inequalities, puts a strain on democracy. At the same time, young people around the world are making their voices heard like never before – pushing to shape the agenda in recognition that it is their futures on the line. We know that our actions today will define the role and nature of Europe for the rest of the 21st century – and whether new generations, including yours, will be better off than their predecessors. I am convinced that to address these era-defining changes, we need more Europe – not less. We need your generation strongly engaged in defining your own future. And we need to continue to forge our European unity. This fits well with the legacy of many leading European figures, from Mario Soares to Salvador de Madariaga, instrumental in the creation of this College, and from Václav Havel to Jacques Delors. There is one ongoing example where our unity stands out against all odds – and it is my privilege to experience it first-hand. I am talking about how our Member States and our European Institutions have stood together in the wake of Brexit. I promised the Rector, dear Federica, that I would try to describe today how I see our deep-rooted relations with the United Kingdom. * To start, we must go back some thirty-three years – a year before the fall of the Berlin Wall – when the UK Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, came to this College to deliver her famous ‘Bruges' speech on Britain and Europe. And I remember that even though it was a clearly anti-federalist speech, it also was very pro- European in its own way – underlining, among other things, the intertwined fate of the UK and the rest of Europe over hundreds of years. She stressed the imperative of “standing together” as well as “understanding each other better”, saying: “I want to see us work more closely on the things we can do better together than alone.” And we should remember everything we have accomplished with the integral support and contribution of the UK during its 47 years of membership in the European family: Building the single European market; reforming the Common Agricultural Policy; supporting enterprise, innovation and competitiveness; but also striking global trade agreements; defending freedom and human rights around the globe; fighting all types of discrimination; and strengthening our security through deeper cooperation with NATO. We also did “not forget those living east of the Iron Curtain” – to cite Margaret Thatcher in Bruges again – and we therefore became a truly European Union. And yet, some five years ago almost to the day, the United Kingdom chose to leave our Union and unpick decades of close integration. While respecting the democratic decision of UK voters, a vast majority of us very much regretted this decision. We had no doubt that this was a lose-lose situation – and nothing has happened subsequently to change our minds. The five years since have felt both very long and very short. Long because of the countless rounds of negotiations with the UK, patiently led by my colleague and friend, Michel Barnier. Long because of the challenges we have had to overcome – from the protection of EU citizens and UK nationals who had enjoyed the free movement rights of the European Union, to the unique situation on the island of Ireland, to the level playing field, and to the sensitive issue of fisheries, amongst others. And short, given their far-reaching outcome. Two international treaties negotiated, signed and ratified in what was, relatively speaking, lightning speed. I am talking about the Withdrawal Agreement, and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, as the most comprehensive international deal adopted yet. This is a major achievement, which clearly shows that the long history of cooperation between the EU and the UK did not come to a halt on 23 June 2016. * The European Union and the United Kingdom are, and will remain, close neighbours and strategic allies. We share fundamental values and principles, such as democracy, the rule of law, freedom of speech, respect for minorities and the fight against discrimination. We share strong political objectives, such as protecting people around the world from the pandemic, fighting climate change, combatting terrorism, and confronting geopolitical threats from those who seek to do us harm. We also traditionally share faith in a multilateral, rules-based global order, as the best way to solve conflicts. We both believe in bringing joined-up responses to global challenges, we support the United Nations, and play a positive role in the G7, for instance. Given these common familial traits – as well as our global interdependence – I believe we cannot afford to spend any more time fighting a supposed zero-sum game. Rather, we must use all our energy to build the kind of cooperation we need in today's world – rigorously promoting those common values, interests and objectives, for our collective benefit. For that, we need to finally move on from Brexit once and for all, and forge a path towards a shared future between two strong, strategic partners. At times, this may sound like wishful thinking. But there is everything to gain from this – if it is embraced as our common objective. There are, I believe, three keys to succeed on this journey, which I will discuss in greater detail. First and foremost, we need to restore trust by respecting our international obligations and living up to our responsibilities. Second, we need to build a strategic and enduring relationship with the UK, based on the Trade and Cooperation Agreement. And third, we need to act as close partners in the world. On the EU side, this means continuing to invest forcefully in the future of our European Union. * So first: To restore trust, we have to abide by our international obligations, notably those stemming from the Withdrawal Agreement. During the negotiations, the EU paid utmost attention to the impact Brexit would have on our citizens as well as on the people of the United Kingdom. Our protective approach to citizens' rights will always be a central tenet of our thinking. This affects more than six million people and we are working flat out with our Member States and the UK to make sure their rights are fully upheld. That means ensuring that more than five million EU citizens living in the UK have legal certainty and can continue to benefit – economically, socially and culturally – from residence status. There are just two weeks left for EU citizens to apply to keep this status before the deadline at the end of this month. We must therefore continue our constructive cooperation. And generally speaking, we must treat each other's citizens with the utmost respect and fairness – be it at our borders or in their daily lives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The EU and the South Caucasus 25 Years Since Independence Nov 25, 2016 by Amanda Paul
    The EU and the South Caucasus 25 Years Since Independence Nov 25, 2016 by Amanda Paul Wedged between regional powers Russia, Iran and Turkey, the South Caucasus is an extraordinarily complex region; one of the most security-challenged and fragmented regions in the world with internal and external security threats working to reinforce each other. The three South Caucasus states – Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan – are complicated even in their internal configuration. Twenty-five years since the collapse of the Soviet Union the region remains plagued by conflict, its people living in insecurity. Moreover, the region has not been politically or economically integrated. Rather Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia have integrated into a wide-range of different, sometimes opposing, organisations and alliances. The EU joined the mix of actors and organisations engaged in the South Caucasus in the early 1990‟s intensifying its engagement over the years with the three states becoming part of the EU‟s European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and Eastern Partnership (EaP). Despite hopes that the ENP/EaP could act as transformative tool to help strengthen stability, security, democracy and bring about a more cohesive region, the results have been rather patchy. The EU has failed to carve out a clear strategy or policy for the region and with the exception of Georgia there has been little genuine will to implement serious reform. Moreover, Russia‟s annexation of Crimea and war in the Donbas in 2014 and the increasingly polarised standoff between Moscow and the West has further exacerbated the fragile security situation, further exposing the inability of the EU to guarantee or even shore-up a partner‟s security.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of the Youth, Peace and Security Conference
    1 Wednesday, 23 May European Parliament – open to all participants – 12:00 – 13:00 Registration European Parliament Accreditation Centre (right-hand side of the Simone Veil Agora entrance to the Altiero Spinelli building) 13:00 – 14:00 Buffet lunch reception Members’ Restaurant, Altiero Spinelli building 14:00 – 15:00 Opening Session Room 5G-3, Altiero Spinelli building Keynote Address by Mr. Antonio Tajani, President of the European Parliament Chair Ms. Heidi Hautala, Vice-President of the European Parliament Speakers Ms. Mariya Gabriel, EU Commissioner for Digital Economy and Society Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Ms. Ivana Tufegdzic, fYROM, EP Young Political Leaders Mr. Dereje Wordofa, UNFPA Deputy Executive Director Ms. Nour Kaabi, Tunisia, NET-MED Youth – UNESCO Mr. Oyewole Simon Oginni, Nigeria, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow 2 15:00 – 16:30 Parallel Thematic Panel Discussions Panel I Youth inclusion for conflict prevention and sustaining peace Library reading room, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Soraya Post, Member of the European Parliament Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Mr. Christian Leffler, Deputy Secretary-General, European External Action Service Mr. Amnon Morag, Israel, EP Young Political Leaders Ms. Hela Slim, France, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow Mr. MacDonald K. Munyoro, Zimbabwe, EP Young Political Leaders Facilitator Ms. Gizem Kilinc, United Network of Young Peacebuilders Panel II Young people innovating for peace Library room 128, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Barbara Pesce-Monteiro, Director, UN/UNDP Representation Office in Brussels Ms. Anna-Katharina Deininger, OSCE CiO Special Representative and OSG Focal Point on Youth and Security Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity Games and Policy Tools in Eastern Partnership Countries Andrey Makarychev
    Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity games and policy tools in Eastern Partnership countries Andrey Makarychev No 2018/02, February 2018 Abstract This paper applies the concepts of hegemony and hybridity as analytical tools to help understand the structural changes taking place within the Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries and beyond. The author points to the split identities of many post-Soviet societies and the growing appeal of solutions aimed at balancing Russia’s or the EU’s dominance as important factors shaping EaP dynamics. Against this background, he explores how the post-Soviet borderlands can find their place in a still hypothetical pan-European space, and free themselves from the tensions of their competing hegemons. The EaP is divided into those countries that signed Association Agreements with the EU and those preferring to maintain their loyalty to Eurasian integration. Bringing the two groups closer together, however, is not beyond policy imagination. The policy-oriented part of this analysis focuses on a set of ideas and schemes aimed at enhancing interaction and blurring divisions between these countries. The author proposes five scenarios that might shape the future of EaP countries’ relations with the EU and with Russia: 1) the conflictual status quo in which both hegemonic powers will seek to weaken the position of the other; 2) trilateralism (EU, Russia plus an EaP country), which has been tried and failed, but still is considered as a possible option by some policy analysts; 3) the Kazakhstan-Armenia model of diplomatic advancement towards the EU, with some potential leverage on Russia; 4) deeper engagement by the EU with the Eurasian Economic Union, which has some competences for tariffs and technical standards; and 5) the decoupling of security policies from economic projects, which is so far the most difficult option to foresee and implement in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy in the European Union.Pdf
    Italy in the European Union POL S 346/JSIS A 302: Europeanizaon of poli:cal systems Spring Term 2017 Frank Wendler May 23, 2017 Italy in the EU From top leL clockwise to center: Signing of the Treaty of Rome founding the EEC in 1957, former Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi, EU Foreign Policy Representave Federica Mogherini, 5-Star Movement leader Beppe Grillo, a scene with refugees on Lampedusa, portal of Italian bank Monte dei Paschi and President Obama with Italian PM Maeo Renzi in 2016. Three theses about Italy’s membership in the European Union (1) Membership in the European Union has worked as an almost con:nuous pressure for economic and poli:cal reform in Italy. (2) These economic and poli:cal reforms are hard to realize because of the specific structure of Italy’s poli:cal system, which combines a strong ins:tu:onal consensus democracy with high poli:cal polarizaon. (3) The result is that Europeanizaon has increased the centrifugal tendencies of Italian poli:cs, leaving three main op:ons for a resolu:on: an:-elite populism, technocrac government or ins:tu:onal reform. ‘Gli Esami Non Finiscono Mai’ Vincent della Sala ‘Gli Esami Non Finiscono Mai’: The EU as an ininite test of Italy’s modernization • Italy as a founding member of the EEC 1957 • Post-war stabiliziaon and rehabilitaon • Par:cipaon in the Single Market • EC Single Market as a test of Italy’s compe::veness • Membership in the Eurozone • Far-reaching economic and social reform passed to meet membership criteria • Link between EU Membership and domes:c poli:cal reform • 2016
    [Show full text]
  • Post DIGITAL REVOLUTION for the Many, Not for the Few
    10 # # The 10 WINTER 2018-2019 3.00 € Progressive Post DIGITAL REVOLUTION for the many, not for the few SPECIAL COVERAGE #EP2019 How could the Left recover? NEXT DEMOCRACY NEXT GLOBAL NEXT SOCIAL Baby-boomers vs Millennials Bolsonaro, the Left Social housing: back on and Europe the progressive agenda NEXT ECONOMY NEXT LEFT NEXT ENVIRONMENT FOLLOW UP End of Quantitative easing - Culture to rebuild Free public transport Global Compact for Safe, Scenarios for the real economy faith in democracy everywhere Orderly and Regular Migration Quarterly : December - January - February www.progressivepost.eu ProgressiveThe Post Europeans share a common history and future, but their ideas and ideals still need a public space. The Progressive Post The truly European progressive opinion magazine that gathers world-renowned experts, to offer a platform informing the public about the issues facing Europe today. The Progressive Post The magazine is published in two languages: English and French. We’ve got also partnerships with The Fabian Review (UK) and TEMAS (ES) Progressivepost.eu + @FEPS-Europe Daily analysis and opinion to supplement the print edition With the support of the European Parliament PUBLICATION DIRECTOR Ernst Stetter EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Alain Bloëdt EDITORS Karine Jehelmann, Olaf Bruns EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Ania Skrzypek, David Rinaldi, Vassilis Ntousas, Maria Freitas, Hedwig Giusto, Charlotte Billingham, Lisa Kastner, Laeticia Thissen, Justin Nogarède TRANSLATORS Ben O'Donovan, Amandine Gillet, Françoise Hoffelinck, Eurideas Language Experts PROOFREADING Louise Hanzlik, Stéphanie Bessalem COORDINATION & GRAPHIC DESIGN www.triptyque.be PHOTO CREDITS Shutterstock, The EU’s Audiovisual Media Services COVER ILLUSTRATION Peter Willems - Vec-Star COPYRIGHT © FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies N°10 - Winter 2018 - 19 ISSN 2506-7362 EDITORIAL Digital: revolution without revolt by Maria Joao Rodrigues, FEPS President This edition focuses on the digital revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by First Vice-President Frans Timmermans, High
    European Commission - Statement Statement by First Vice-President Frans Timmermans, High- Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini and Migration and Home Affairs Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos on the recent incident in the Mediterranean Brussels, 06 August 2015 It is with great sadness that we learned of the incident that took place just a few miles off the coast of Libya yesterday. The EU wants to commend the Italian Coast Guard, the Frontex-deployed assets and boats operated by Médecins Sans Frontières and Migrant Offshore Aid Station for their relentless efforts to save lives, today and in the past. Though nearly 400 lives could be saved, at least 25 lives were lost in this latest tragedy. Just one life lost is one too many. The EU is working hard to prevent these terrible tragedies. We have tripled the resources dedicated to search and rescue efforts at sea, allowing us to rescue over 50,000 people since 1 June 2015. But even if the number of people dying at sea has fallen dramatically, it is not enough and will never be enough to prevent all tragedies. We must also recognise that emergency measures have been necessary because the collective European policy on the matter in the past has fallen short. There is no simple, nor single, answer to the challenges posed by migration. And nor can any Member State effectively address migration alone. It is clear that we need a new, more European approach. The European Agenda on Migration we presented in May sets out this European response, combining internal and external policies, making best use of EU agencies and tools, and involving all actors: Member States, EU institutions, International Organisations, civil society, local authorities and third countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and US Relations
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations (name redacted) Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs June 1, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33476 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Since Israel’s founding in 1948, successive U.S. Presidents and many Members of Congress have demonstrated a commitment to Israel’s security and to maintaining close U.S.-Israel cooperation. Common perceptions of shared democratic values and religious affinities have contributed to the strong bilateral ties. The question of Israel’s security regularly influences U.S. policy considerations regarding the Middle East, and Congress provides active oversight of executive branch dealings with Israel and other actors in the region. Israel is a leading recipient of U.S. foreign aid and a frequent purchaser of major U.S. weapons systems. By law, U.S. arms sales cannot adversely affect Israel’s “qualitative military edge” over other countries in its region. The two countries signed a free trade agreement in 1985, and the United States is Israel’s largest trading partner. Israel has many regional security concerns and aligning U.S. and Israeli policies to address these concerns has presented persistent challenges. By voicing criticism of international diplomacy on Iran’s nuclear program, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu may seek to give Israel a voice in an ongoing negotiating process in which it does not directly participate. As a June 2015 deadline nears for a comprehensive international agreement on the issue, Israel apparently seeks material assurances that the United States will bolster its regional security standing and self-defense capabilities. In addition to concerns over Iran, Israel’s perceptions of security around its borders have changed since 2011 as several surrounding Arab countries have experienced political upheaval.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Affairs Ministers
    FOREIGN AFFAIRS COUNCIL - 18.04.2016 - Bruxelles PARTICIPANTS High Representative Ms Federica MOGHERINI High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Belgium: Mr Didier REYNDERS Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign and European Affairs, with responsibility for Beliris and Federal Cultural Institutions Bulgaria: Mr Daniel MITOV Minister for Foreign Affairs Czech Republic: Mr Lubomir ZAORÁLEK Minister for Foreign Affairs Denmark: Mr Kristian JENSEN Minister for Foreign Affairs Germany: Mr Frank-Walter STEINMEIER Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs Estonia: Ms Marina KALJURAND Minister of Foreign Affairs Ireland: Mr Charles FLANAGAN Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Greece: Mr Nikolaos KOTZIAS Minister for Foreign Affairs Spain: Mr José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO y MARFIL Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation France: Mr Jean- Marc AYRAULT Minister of Foreign Affairs Croatia: Mr Miro KOVAČ Minister of Foreign and European Affairs Italy: Mr Paolo GENTILONI Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Cyprus: Mr Ioannis KASOULIDES Minister for Foreign Affairs Latvia: Mr Edgars RINKĒVIČS Minister for Foreign Affairs Lithuania: Mr Linas Antanas LINKEVIČIUS Minister for Foreign Affairs Luxembourg: Mr Jean ASSELBORN Minister for Foreign and European Affairs, Minister for Immigration and Asylum Hungary: Mr Péter SZIJJÁRTÓ Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Malta: Ms Marlene BONNICI Permanent Representative Netherlands: Mr Bert KOENDERS Minister for Foreign Affairs Austria: Mr Sebastian
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Europeanization in Georgia and Armenia
    A. Chitaladze, T. Grigoryan / Analytical Bulletin 8 (2015) Understanding Europeanization in Georgia and Armenia - Discourses, Perceptions and the Impact on Bilateral Relations Ana Chitaladze Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University [email protected], Tatevik Grigoryan Yerevan Brusov State University of Languages and Social Science [email protected] Keywords: Europeanization, Armenia, Georgia, EU, Association agreement, Russia, Customs Union, EurAsEC, discourses, bilateral relations. Introduction Post-Soviet Georgia and Armenia have a long history of cooperation with the European Union (EU). With the aim of deepening bilateral ties with the EU, both countries were included in the Eastern Partnership (EaP) program. Since 2009, the European Union began negotiating the Association Agreement, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Georgia and Armenia. Several reforms have been conducted to converge their policy to that of the European Union. But the geopolitical climate has changed significantly. On 3 September 2013, when the Agreement was finalized in Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, President of the Republic of Armenia, made an unexpected announcement about the decision to join the Russian-led Eurasian Customs Union instead of signing an Association Agreement with the EU. Armenian membership in the EurAsEC Customs Union would be incompatible with the agreements negotiated with the EU1. Thus, the Armenia–EU 1 Rettman. A., Armenia to join Russia trade bloc, surprises EU, EUObserver, September 3, 2013, https://euobserver.com/foreign/121304 (accessed on 04.08.2015) 29 A. Chitaladze, T. Grigoryan / Analytical Bulletin 8 (2015) Association Agreement was called off by Armenia in early September 2013, though a revised agreement is still under consideration. Unlike Armenia, EU membership still stays the top priority in the Georgian political agenda and Georgia signed the EU association agreement in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 13T H April, 2015. H.E.Mrs. Federica Mogherini High Representative Of
    13th April, 2015. H.E.Mrs. Federica Mogherini High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission Brussels Dear High Representative and Vice-President of the Commission, We welcome the renewed engagement of the EU in the Middle East Peace Process since your appointment and in particular the personal commitment that you are demonstrating. We would like to draw your attention to the letter dated 13th April 2013 sent to your predecessor on EU wide guidelines on the labelling of settlement produce/products. Following the public commitment made by the Council in May and December 2012 and more recently in November 2014, we remain of the view that this is an important step in the full implementation of EU longstanding policy, in relation to the preservation of the two-state solution. The continued expansion of Israeli illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and other territories occupied by Israel since 1967, threatens the prospect of a just and final peace agreement. Moreover, the correct and coherent implementation of EU consumer protection and EU labeling legislation is necessary to ensure that consumers are not being misled by false information. European consumers must indeed have confidence in knowing the origin of goods they are purchasing. Green Line Israel and Palestinian producers will benefit from this. We would welcome you taking the lead in the Commission, in order to complete this important work on labelling of settlement produce/products.
    [Show full text]
  • Guest Editorial
    Guest Editorial Serving the Union Foreign and Security Policy * Federica MOGHERINI My five years as High Representative of the European Union for Foreign and Security policy and Vice President of the European Commission have been extremely intense and rich of many different experiences: from negotiations on the Iran nuclear deal to the launch of the EU defence package and the partnership with NATO, from the adoption of the Global Strategy to the work done with the UN and the African Union to rescue migrants in Libya – it would be simply impossible even to mention, in a short editorial, all the defining moments and processes that made those years unique to me. Rather than choosing one or two stories out of the many that have constituted the diplomatic and the defence work done from 2014 to 2019, I take the opportunity to focus on two underlying factors that are recurrently presented as major impediments to the development of a proper EU Foreign and Security Policy. I will try to share here some considerations that derive from my direct experience, and that contradict these two assumptions that are often repeated as an absolute, self-evident truth. The first is that the High Representative/Vice President, as defined in the Lisbon Treaty, is ‘an impossible job’. The second is that ‘the EU doesn’t have a foreign policy’ or ‘doesn’t speak with one voice’. I have always been convinced that none of these two considerations is true, and my five years in office have consolidated my arguments. First, let’s look at the ‘impossibility factor’ of the role.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief
    EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON FOREIGN BRIEF POLICY RELATIONS ecfr.eu Occupation and Sovereignty: Renewing EU Policy in Israel- Palestine Hugh Lovatt Developments in 2017 have brought into focus the one- state reality taking hold on the ground in Israel-Palestine, SUMMARY and the consequences this will have for all concerned. • Developments in 2017 have brought into Israeli actions have steadily eroded the territorial basis for focus the one-state reality taking hold in a two-state solution and undermined attempts to reach a Israel-Palestine. This will have unavoidable peace agreement with the Palestinians. Meanwhile, Donald repercussions for the EU and its member Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and states, underlining the urgent need for efforts to distance himself from the two-state solution have bolder and more decisive EU action. only accelerated this shift towards a one-state reality. • The EU must take seriously the implications The cementing of “a one-state reality of unequal rights, of an emerging one-state reality for EU-Israel perpetual occupation and conflict” – in the words relations and EU policy more generally. This of Federica Mogherini, the European Union’s high should not be about discarding the two- representative for foreign affairs and vice-president of state solution but rather acknowledging that the European Commission – require Israel to choose an immediate course correction is required between maintaining either its democracy or its Jewish to avoid a fully fledged one-state reality of political majority, in the extent to which it grants rights perpetual occupation and unequal rights. to the almost five million Palestinians under its military control.1 For Palestinians, a one-state reality may eventually • Despite the absence of credible US leadership, lead to political empowerment.
    [Show full text]