DOCSLIB.ORG

Fighter Aircraft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEI b I .r.7 FIGHTE] AIR RAFT ..:, I c .:{ ii o Report of the DefenseScien ce Boafd rce -L at) FO rr p( € oc) :1,'::',;j a o(d o6q a o- t (n oo aE O r-r \+{ o Volume o> o BASICREPORT it{+!r!!q# ]J H fiJ gE Ai . ri :.1 +J(d _ l' : : , t{d ," aua nii xv o M, I Mqy I968 .B >d B'v <(, I M.1 ^,F- t1* 4g ^, ?t3r-. I t{l 6b trt \o "" -(Jo o'. *..-- H H 1/') t'r O > t- 3' ln oddition lo securily requirementsthot opply to this documentond mu$Ae compliedwith, eoch rionsrittol outside the Deportmentof Defensemust h\e @ the prior opprovolof the Office o{ the Director of DefenseReseorch ond Ergineering \o t-r -.44 ro GROUP rrrifrIf .:#ftHF, Downgraded at 3-y rrLl{ltr\LFT declassified afte tt:t-,c',#o€oK6 r,5r4DL_ nc4-1iAti!i$.P.+ FIGHTER ATRCRAFT Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force Volume II: Basic Report I May 1958 l I I I ' r ,;r;.lj 'a:. !,q I I I This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States with_ !1the meaning of the EspionageLaws, Tiile 18,U. S.C. , Sections?93 and ?94. The trans- mission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by taw. Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering Washington, D. C. --ltt ' -.-, ,-.-.-. Ii. i SEER.ET lllt$Lhsruttll MEMBERSHIP of *:tl!&ii&ri{* DEF'ENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE on FIGHTER AIRCRAF'T Dr. Richard Garwin, IBM Watson Laboratory Chairman Dr. Thomas Amlie U. S. Naval Weapons Center Mr. Terrell E. Greene The RAND Corporation Dr. Andrew Longacre Syracuse University Mr. Homer Tasker Tasker Instruments Corporation *.*"F Mr. Warren \4rhite Airborne Instruments Laboratory Staff As sistants Colonel P. H. Van Sickle, Office of the Director of Defense USAF Research and Engineering Major Jarnes S. Creedon, Office of the Director of USAF Operations, Department of the Air Force --',,t,:.*3- f {fimrL$$fff? SEER,ET' \lNtlhSrtrtLrI SEER,ET single missile can perform both functions, at a somewhat greater cost per missile but with increased effectiveness and perhaps reduced overall cost because of the reduced force-mix t14peof problems. As the development program proceeds, it should be possible to decide between a single missile and two missiles for this task. t#;' 3. The report mentions the importance of ECM and other counterg to the surface-to-air missile, and t.Le Board wishes especially to stress the critical nature of this problem. In addition, the air battle between a number of our fighters and a number of enemy fighters cannot be effectively handled from individual aircraft, and adequate cornmunications, AWACS, other theater control and tFF aie of great import. With these comments, the DSB forwards the attached report. ilttlw Robert L. Sproull Chairman, Defense Science Board ...*i+;-r{1.1 t .J:.'-:^l:; t sEeREr {/i|/ff':/tssfft,{.# I i .. t.. SEER,ET 14 May r968 MEMoRANDUM To CHAIRMAN, DEFEN'E scIENcE B.ARD '."4t4#* SUBJECT: Finar rReport of the DSB Task Force on Fighter Aircraft As chairman of the DSB Task Force on Fighter Aircraft, I have honor of submitting the the Finar i::! Force i,uport (sEcRET), an Executive Summary as werl as (CONFIDENTIAL). ifru report largely with is concerned. the next generation of fighter aircraft for the Air Force and the Navy. The report concludes that aircraft with the recom_ ""o"ance' togetherwith 3:|j:3 :n:i:; il-o- newhigh-perrormance ;p" "i",ity ove theexp ec r"d s;;:Iri ii,,! l",fJ.T|! tr Tffi i?, ;:irt r recommendations of t,.e Task Force, as taken ;*t"ltjl from the re- l ' That a development program, foll0wing the basic of prototype procurement approach and tesiing, be irriri"r"a fighter aircraft. now for a new An IOC for the u";i l9Z0s_i. should 'competitive e., before t975_ be sought. prot",yp; grams demonstration flight pro- should be pursued, separately for avionics, for and for engines. airframes, z. The fi.ghter should be designed for to-ground both air-to_air and air_ operations, with the priml."y a""ig' emphasis on air_to- air capabirity. The air-to-air Lapability shourd include combat capab*ity. crose_in The air-to-ground capability primarily should be for visual weapon delivery with homing or area ord.nance sofar as autonomous aircraft in- operations are concerned.. 3' Guided (i. e., steerabre) guns and highly-agile missiles should be provided for forward-hemisphere firing, tests reveal unless flight basic flaws in the concept. airframe Missile seeker, propulsion, and target designati-or, "hoota pro*riau for firing at large angles off missiles the aifcraft nose. R"""_h.misphere should be investigated, ordnance tested, a.ra irr"orp""",.a found in the design if desirable on grounds of utility ".rJ;;;;""*"nce tradeoffs. i/lf,df'r/'$$tri#?SEER.ET \$\tLhsrtrw SEER.ET 4. Head-coupled sights and display should be used to elim-. inate tJre gunsight, radar display, TV display, heads-up display, etc. and provide at the same time flexible all-angle TV viewing and target designation. 5. The avionics should incorporate a pulse-doppler radar with low-PRF mode for ground map, but without either electron- ,':aiidqf.*ji*trtl ic ally- s canned phas ed- ar ray or separ ate te rrain- following radar s. A redundant central digital computer should couple the displays to the weapons, manage stores and do the computations required for flexible weapons deliverY. 6. DDR&E should review those development concept papers for systerns which might be available before or about 1975 to pro- vide planning guidelines for synergistic systems rather than to allow each 7-year advanced system to assume the environment as it was at the beginning of the development cycle. 7. Urgent development commitments should be rnade to: a. navigation systems providing terrain avoidance by navigation b. single-frarne TV for remote target designation and homing c. simple hitting surface-to-surface cruise missiles d. artillery-emplaced, ground and airborne target . designating schemes for horning bombs' e. directed, unmanned reconnaissance and target designation f. effective and flexible air-to-ground ordnance, such as proximity-fuzed air-opening dispenser munitions, cost- reduced bomblet land mines, etc. 8. Development should proceed immediately on a turbofan engine of the zo,000 pound thrust class, with bypass ratio and other design features to be jointly determined by the Nawy and the Air Force. The key to this fi.ghter capability is the head-coupled avionics and flexible ordnance system discussed throughout the report. Detailed exarnples of its use are found in Appendix c of the main report. i .*r-irla SEE R,ET' {.iiNSLA$$tr/ * --ii sEeREr'[t\tLhslutLl! I want to call to youq attention also the extent to which our capability and the effectiveness of even these aircraft can be enhanced by the provision of non-fighterborne systems such as: . adequate theater control and IFF (via AWACS), . theater-range cheap surface-to-surface i$siFfr4.ffi target-hitting cruise missiles, . navigation and communication aids, such as satellite sys- tems or I.ORAN, . adequate target-designating systems, such as laser target designators or artillery-emplaced beacons. I personally wish to emphasize the critical threat that surface-to-air missiles will pose and the necessity for an intensive and enlightened Program on penetration aids and tactics in order to counter these mis siles. ) The Task Force is pleased to have had the opportunity to contribute by I its efforts. ! i '/n/t( t' -%< Richard L. Garwin Chairman, DSB Task tr'orce on Fighter Aircraft t .,r:fq-.:,ij.i AMIAsst{:til# SEER,ET sE c R, Er tLt] \11[tLhSStr PREFACE This report of the Defense Science Boardrs Task Force on Tactical Aircraft is written in response to a request (see AppendixA) from the Director of Defense Research and Engineering for the Defense .1ag{\g}g*+,Sfl Science Board to examine the tactical air-to-air missions and air-to- ground missions for the Navy and the Air Force. As a consequence of the indication that the air-to-air problem should receive priority, the Task Force initially submitted a draft report on this mission area October L96t. Air-to-ground missions were the subject of a further draft added 3 February 1968. The present report supplants the pre- vious drafts, without, for the most part, major changes in conclusions or recommendations. one note of caution-the Task Force has not drawn any overall judgment as to the attrition that soviet missiles of the rgTs-19g5 time frame might cause to tactical aircraft nor as to the corresponding tactics and hardware that must be adopted by tactical aircraft if they are to survive in an environment of advanced surface:to-air missiles. Furthermore, the Task Force has addressed only the characteristics of and the program to obtain an optimum fighter aircraft for the I9?5+ period-the necessary number of such aircraft may be affected by strategic and even political considerations. A brief Executive Summary of this material is issued separately . 'u,."=,,,,,' as Volume I of this report. Both the Executive Summary and this basic {.' report were accepted by the Defense science Board on 8 May 1969. Since the effectiveness as a fighter is the most stringent condition for the aircraft, implications of this role on system design and develop- ment programs are treated first. '. --'.." :.1 .--*,{ ..'',:... I, $ff-H# SEERET' --.--&--4!'.- .- -*,..." ...* SEER,ET CONT ENTS Page Membership of the Defense Science Board Task Force on .r,HSiisSSB Fighter Aircraft 11 Memoranda of Transmittal 111 Preface 1'< I.
Recommended publications
  • LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II

    LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II

    LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II ORREST LEE “WOODY” VOSLER of Lyndonville, Quick Write New York, was a radio operator and gunner during F World War ll. He was the second enlisted member of the Army Air Forces to receive the Medal of Honor. Staff Sergeant Vosler was assigned to a bomb group Time and time again we read about heroic acts based in England. On 20 December 1943, fl ying on his accomplished by military fourth combat mission over Bremen, Germany, Vosler’s servicemen and women B-17 was hit by anti-aircraft fi re, severely damaging it during wartime. After reading the story about and forcing it out of formation. Staff Sergeant Vosler, name Vosler was severely wounded in his legs and thighs three things he did to help his crew survive, which by a mortar shell exploding in the radio compartment. earned him the Medal With the tail end of the aircraft destroyed and the tail of Honor. gunner wounded in critical condition, Vosler stepped up and manned the guns. Without a man on the rear guns, the aircraft would have been defenseless against German fi ghters attacking from that direction. Learn About While providing cover fi re from the tail gun, Vosler was • the development of struck in the chest and face. Metal shrapnel was lodged bombers during the war into both of his eyes, impairing his vision. Able only to • the development of see indistinct shapes and blurs, Vosler never left his post fi ghters during the war and continued to fi re.
  • P-38J Over Europe 1170 US WWII FIGHTER 1:48 SCALE PLASTIC KIT

    P-38J Over Europe 1170 US WWII FIGHTER 1:48 SCALE PLASTIC KIT

    P-38J over Europe 1170 US WWII FIGHTER 1:48 SCALE PLASTIC KIT intro The Lockheed P-38 Lightning was developed to a United States Army Air Corps requirement. It became famous not only for its performance in the skies of WWII, but also for its unusual appearance. The Lightning, designed by the Lockheed team led by Chief Engineer Clarence 'Kelly' Johnson, was a complete departure from conventional airframe design. Powered by two liquid cooled inline V-1710 engines, it was almost twice the size of other US fighters and was armed with four .50 cal. machine guns plus a 20 mm cannon, giving the Lightning not only the firepower to deal with enemy aircraft, but also the capability to inflict heavy damage on ships. The first XP-38 prototype, 37-457, was built under tight secrecy and made its maiden flight on January 27, 1939. The USAAF wasn´t satisfied with the big new fighter, but gave permission for a transcontinental speed dash on February 11, 1939. During this event, test pilot Kelsey crashed at Mitchell Field, NY. Kelsey survived the cash but the airplane was written off. Despite this, Lockheed received a contract for thirteen preproduction YP-38s. The first production version was the P-38D (35 airplanes only armed with 37mm cannon), followed by 210 P-38Es which reverted back to the 20 mm cannon. These planes began to arrive in October 1941 just before America entered World War II. The next versions were P-38F, P-38G, P-38H and P-38J. The last of these introduced an improved shape of the engine nacelles with redesigned air intakes and cooling system.
  • The Cost of Replacing Today's Air Force Fleet

    The Cost of Replacing Today's Air Force Fleet

    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE The Cost of Replacing Today’s Air Force Fleet DECEMBER 2018 Notes The years referred to in this report are federal fiscal years, which run from October 1 to September 30 and are designated by the calendar year in which they end. All costs are expressed in 2018 dollars. For the years before 2018, costs are adjusted for inflation using the gross domestic product price index from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Costs for years after 2018 are adjusted for inflation using the Congressional Budget Office’s projection of that index. On the cover: An F-15C Eagle during takeoff. U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sergeant Joe W. McFadden. www.cbo.gov/publication/54657 Contents Summary 1 Today’s Air Force Aircraft and Their Replacement Costs 1 BOX 1. MAJOR AIRCRAFT IN THE AIR FORCE’S FLEET AND THEIR PRIMARY FUNCTIONS 2 How CBO Made Its Projections 5 Projected Costs of New Fighter Aircraft 6 F-35A 7 Light Attack Aircraft 7 Penetrating Counter Air Aircraft 8 Managing Procurement Costs in Peak Years 9 Appendix: Composition of the Current Air Force Fleet and CBO’s Estimate of Replacement Costs 11 List of Tables and Figures 18 About This Document 19 The Cost of Replacing Today’s Air Force Fleet Summary different missions (seeBox 1 and the appendix). They The U.S. Air Force has about 5,600 aircraft, which range range widely in age from the 75 new aircraft that entered in age from just-delivered to 60 years old.
  • Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War

    Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War

    The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War PRINTER: strip in FIGURE NUMBER A-1 Shoot at 277% bleed all sides Stephen L. McFarland A Douglas P–70 takes off for a night fighter training mission, silhouetted by the setting Florida sun. 2 The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War Stephen L. McFarland AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM 1998 Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War The author traces the AAF’s development of aerial night fighting, in- cluding technology, training, and tactical operations in the North African, European, Pacific, and Asian theaters of war. In this effort the United States never wanted for recruits in what was, from start to finish, an all-volunteer night fighting force. Cut short the night; use some of it for the day’s business. — Seneca For combatants, a constant in warfare through the ages has been the sanctuary of night, a refuge from the terror of the day’s armed struggle. On the other hand, darkness has offered protection for operations made too dangerous by daylight. Combat has also extended into the twilight as day has seemed to provide too little time for the destruction demanded in modern mass warfare. In World War II the United States Army Air Forces (AAF) flew night- time missions to counter enemy activities under cover of darkness. Allied air forces had established air superiority over the battlefield and behind their own lines, and so Axis air forces had to exploit the night’s protection for their attacks on Allied installations.
  • P-38 Lightning

    P-38 Lightning

    P-38 Lightning P-38 Lightning Type Heavy fighter Manufacturer Lockheed Designed by Kelly Johnson Maiden flight 27 January 1939 Introduction 1941 Retired 1949 Primary user United States Army Air Force Produced 1941–45 Number built 10,037[1] Unit cost US$134,284 when new[2] Variants Lockheed XP-49 XP-58 Chain Lightning The Lockheed P-38 Lightning was a World War II American fighter aircraft. Developed to a United States Army Air Corps requirement, the P-38 had distinctive twin booms with forward-mounted engines and a single, central nacelle containing the pilot and armament. The aircraft was used in a number of different roles, including dive bombing, level bombing, ground strafing, photo reconnaissance missions,[3] and extensively as a long-range escort fighter when equipped with droppable fuel tanks under its wings. The P-38 was used most extensively and successfully in the Pacific Theater of Operations and the China-Burma-India Theater of Operations, where it was flown by the American pilots with the highest number of aerial victories to this date. The Lightning called "Marge" was flown by the ace of aces Richard Bong who earned 40 victories. Second with 38 was Thomas McGuire in his aircraft called "Pudgy". In the South West Pacific theater, it was a primary fighter of United States Army Air Forces until the appearance of large numbers of P-51D Mustangs toward the end of the war. [4][5] 1 Design and development Lockheed YP-38 (1943) Lockheed designed the P-38 in response to a 1937 United States Army Air Corps request for a high- altitude interceptor aircraft, capable of 360 miles per hour at an altitude of 20,000 feet, (580 km/h at 6100 m).[6] The Bell P-39 Airacobra and the Curtiss P-40 Warhawk were also designed to meet the same requirements.
  • Aircraft Collection

    Aircraft Collection

    A, AIR & SPA ID SE CE MU REP SEU INT M AIRCRAFT COLLECTION From the Avenger torpedo bomber, a stalwart from Intrepid’s World War II service, to the A-12, the spy plane from the Cold War, this collection reflects some of the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN MILITARY AVIATION. Photo: Liam Marshall TABLE OF CONTENTS Bombers / Attack Fighters Multirole Helicopters Reconnaissance / Surveillance Trainers OV-101 Enterprise Concorde Aircraft Restoration Hangar Photo: Liam Marshall BOMBERS/ATTACK The basic mission of the aircraft carrier is to project the U.S. Navy’s military strength far beyond our shores. These warships are primarily deployed to deter aggression and protect American strategic interests. Should deterrence fail, the carrier’s bombers and attack aircraft engage in vital operations to support other forces. The collection includes the 1940-designed Grumman TBM Avenger of World War II. Also on display is the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, a true workhorse of the 1950s and ‘60s, as well as the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk and Grumman A-6 Intruder, stalwarts of the Vietnam War. Photo: Collection of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum GRUMMAN / EASTERNGRUMMAN AIRCRAFT AVENGER TBM-3E GRUMMAN/EASTERN AIRCRAFT TBM-3E AVENGER TORPEDO BOMBER First flown in 1941 and introduced operationally in June 1942, the Avenger became the U.S. Navy’s standard torpedo bomber throughout World War II, with more than 9,836 constructed. Originally built as the TBF by Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, they were affectionately nicknamed “Turkeys” for their somewhat ungainly appearance. Bomber Torpedo In 1943 Grumman was tasked to build the F6F Hellcat fighter for the Navy.
  • Lightweight Fighter Aircraft Program

    Lightweight Fighter Aircraft Program

    / C '3 3 'GOVERNMENT Senate Hearing^ Storage Before the Committee on Appro priation s Y)t )C U M r HTS -------- -------------- L ig h tw e ig h t F ig h te r A ir c ra ft P ro g ra m . T 0 7 6 MAY 1 ? 1975 t h ^ ta« un^ X s,ty KANSA o Lightweight Fighter Aircraft Program m in H < —'— J- □ " 1 □ IT Fis ca l Y ear 1976 H H < 94“ CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION LIGHTWEIGHT FIGH TER AIRC RA FT PROGRAM H E A R IN G BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE NIN ETY-F OURTH CONGRESS F IR ST SE SS IO N Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 52-600 0 WASHINGTON : 1975 SU BC OM MITTE E OF THE CO MMIT TE E ON APP ROPR IA TIO NS JO HN L. McC LE LL AN , A rk an sa s, C hair m an JO HN C. ST EN NIS , Mississ ippi MILTO N R. YOUNG, Nor th Dak ot a JO HN O. PA ST OR E, Rhode Island ROMAN L. HR US KA , Neb ra sk a WA RREN G. MAGNUSON, W as hing ton CL IF FO RD I’. CA SE, New Je rs ey MIK E MANS FIEL D, M on tana HIRA M L. FON G, Haw aii GALE W. Mc GE E, Wyomi ng TE D ST EV EN S, Alaska WILL IAM I’ROX MIRE, Wisco nsin RICH AR D S.
  • F—18 Navy Air Combat Fighter

    F—18 Navy Air Combat Fighter

    74 /2 >Af ^y - Senate H e a r tn ^ f^ n 12]$ Before the Committee on Appro priations (,() \ ER WIIA Storage ime nts F EB 1 2 « T H e -,M<rUN‘U«sni KAN S A S S F—18 Na vy Air Com bat Fighter Fiscal Year 1976 th CONGRESS, FIRS T SES SION H .R . 986 1 SPECIAL HEARING F - 1 8 NA VY AIR CO MBA T FIG H TER HEARING BEFORE A SUBC OMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE NIN ETY-FOURTH CONGRESS FIR ST SE SS IO N ON H .R . 9 8 6 1 AN ACT MAKIN G APP ROPR IA TIO NS FO R THE DEP ARTM EN T OF D EFEN SE FO R T H E FI SC AL YEA R EN DI NG JU N E 30, 1976, AND TH E PE RIO D BE GIN NIN G JU LY 1, 1976, AN D EN DI NG SEPT EM BER 30, 1976, AND FO R OTH ER PU RP OSE S P ri nte d fo r th e use of th e Com mittee on App ro pr ia tio ns SPECIAL HEARING U.S. GOVERNM ENT PRINT ING OFF ICE 60-913 O WASHINGTON : 1976 SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS JOHN L. MCCLELLAN, Ark ans as, Chairman JOH N C. ST ENN IS, Mississippi MILTON R. YOUNG, No rth D ako ta JOH N O. P ASTORE, Rhode Island ROMAN L. HRUSKA, N ebraska WARREN G. MAGNUSON, Washin gton CLIFFORD I’. CASE, New Je rse y MIK E MANSFIEL D, Montana HIRAM L.
  • Wonsan Air Festival 2016 TEXT & PHOTOS - PATRICK ROEGIES & JURGEN VAN TOOR

    Wonsan Air Festival 2016 TEXT & PHOTOS - PATRICK ROEGIES & JURGEN VAN TOOR

    Wonsan Air Festival 2016 TEXT & PHOTOS - PATRICK ROEGIES & JURGEN VAN TOOR The very first air show organized in the DPRK took place in September 2016 at Kalma international airport located in the Wonsan Kumgangsan region. Patrick Roegies & Jurgen Van Toor reports from North Korea. $ A two ship of Su-25K’s fighter bomber passing by during their demonstration flight at the Wonsan Air Festival 2016. Photo by Patrick Roegies 58 59 Wonsan Air Festival 2016 Civil participants The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea The Air Festival event was organized with the (DPRK) is one of the most isolated nations in purpose to promote the spirit of international the world and from an aviation point of view not peace and friendship through a joint passion much is known concerning the aircraft within the towards aviation. Patrick Roegies and Jurgen operational inventory of their Air Force. van Toor report. Until recently there were no air shows in the A wide variety of participants took part in the air Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). show. The Wonsan air club, Air Koryo and the Military exercises could only be attended by DPRK Air Force were the main contributors of the DPRK leaders and officials on invitation of the air displays supplemented with remote controlled government. model aircraft and sky diving performances of the Pyongyang Air Club. The very first air show organized in the DPRK took place in September 2016 at Kalma During the Saturday Air Koryo supplied flying international airport located in the Wonsan displays of the Ilyushin Il-18, Ilyushin Il-62, Kumgangsan region.
  • The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron's

    The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron's

    The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron’s Experience during the Development of World War II Tactical Air Power by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 14, 2013 Keywords: World War II, fighter squadrons, tactical air power, P-47 Thunderbolt, European Theater of Operations Copyright 2013 by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce Approved by William Trimble, Chair, Alumni Professor of History Alan Meyer, Assistant Professor of History Mark Sheftall, Associate Professor of History Abstract During the years between World War I and World War II, many within the Army Air Corps (AAC) aggressively sought an independent air arm and believed that strategic bombardment represented an opportunity to inflict severe and dramatic damages on the enemy while operating autonomously. In contrast, working in cooperation with ground forces, as tactical forces later did, was viewed as a subordinate role to the army‘s infantry and therefore upheld notions that the AAC was little more than an alternate means of delivering artillery. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt called for a significantly expanded air arsenal and war plan in 1939, AAC strategists saw an opportunity to make an impression. Eager to exert their sovereignty, and sold on the efficacy of heavy bombers, AAC leaders answered the president‘s call with a strategic air doctrine and war plans built around the use of heavy bombers. The AAC, renamed the Army Air Forces (AAF) in 1941, eventually put the tactical squadrons into play in Europe, and thus tactical leaders spent 1943 and the beginning of 1944 preparing tactical air units for three missions: achieving and maintaining air superiority, isolating the battlefield, and providing air support for ground forces.
  • © Osprey Publishing • © Osprey Publishing • HITLER’S EAGLES

    © Osprey Publishing • © Osprey Publishing • HITLER’S EAGLES

    www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com HITLER’S EAGLES THE LUFTWAFFE 1933–45 Chris McNab © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS Introduction 6 The Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe 10 Luftwaffe – Organization and Manpower 56 Bombers – Strategic Reach 120 Fighters – Sky Warriors 174 Ground Attack – Strike from Above 238 Sea Eagles – Maritime Operations 292 Ground Forces – Eagles on the Land 340 Conclusion 382 Further Reading 387 Index 390 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION A force of Heinkel He 111s near their target over England during the summer of 1940. Once deprived of their Bf 109 escorts, the German bombers were acutely vulnerable to the predations of British Spitfires and Hurricanes. © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com he story of the German Luftwaffe (Air Force) has been an abiding focus of military Thistorians since the end of World War II in 1945. It is not difficult to see why. Like many aspects of the German war machine, the Luftwaffe was a crowning achievement of the German rearmament programme. During the 1920s and early 1930s, the air force was a shadowy organization, operating furtively under the tight restrictions on military development imposed by the Versailles Treaty. Yet through foreign-based aircraft design agencies, civilian air transport and nationalistic gliding clubs, the seeds of a future air force were nevertheless kept alive and growing in Hitler’s new Germany, and would eventually emerge in the formation of the Luftwaffe itself in 1935. The nascent Luftwaffe thereafter grew rapidly, its ranks of both men and aircraft swelling under the ambition of its commander-in-chief, Hermann Göring.
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2015. By Aaron M. U. Church, Senior Editor ■ 2016 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT B-1 Lancer Brief: Long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and de- livering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. COMMENTARY The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four proto- types were developed and tested before program cancellation in 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998. Its three internal weapons bays accommodate a substantial payload of weapons, including a mix of different weapons in each bay. Lancer production totaled 100 aircraft. The bomber’s blended wing/ body configuration, variable-geometry design, and turbofan engines provide long range and loiter time. The B-1B has been upgraded with GPS, smart weapons, and mission systems. Offensive avionics include SAR for tracking, B-2A Spirit (SSgt. Jeremy M. Wilson) targeting, and engaging moving vehicles and terrain following. GPS-aided INS lets aircrews autonomously navigate without ground-based navigation aids Dimensions: Span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 and precisely engage targets. Sniper pod was added in 2008. The ongoing ft, height 34 ft. integrated battle station modifications is the most comprehensive refresh in Weight: Max T-O 477,000 lb.