American Serpentine and Other Leaf Miners CP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Serpentine and Other Leaf Miners CP Contingency Plan – Liriomyza trifolii – American serpentine leafminer (bundled with L. cicerina, L. huidobrensis, L. sativae, L. bryoniae and Chromatomyia horticola) Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Grains Industry Threat Specific Contingency Plan American serpentine leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii, bundled with L. cicerina, L. huidobrensis, L. sativae, L. bryoniae and Chromatomyia horticola Prepared by Dr Peter Ridland, Dr Mallik Malipatil and Plant Health Australia September 2008 Disclaimer: The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Page 1 of 31 Contingency Plan – Liriomyza trifolii – American serpentine leafminer (bundled with L. cicerina, L. huidobrensis, L. sativae, L. bryoniae and Chromatomyia horticola) 1 Purpose of this Contingency Plan................................................................................................... 5 2 Pest information/status .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Pest Details .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 General information ........................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Life cycle ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.2.1 Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) ........................................................................ 7 2.1.2.2 Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) ......................................................... 8 2.1.2.3 Liriomyza sativae Blanchard ..................................................................... 8 2.1.2.4 Liriomyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach) .............................................................. 9 2.1.2.5 Chromatomyia horticola (Goureau) .......................................................... 9 2.1.2.6 Liriomyza cicerina (Rondani) .................................................................. 10 2.2 Affected Hosts .............................................................................................................................. 10 2.2.1 Host range ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.2.2 Geographic distribution .................................................................................................... 11 2.2.3 Symptoms ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.2.3.1 Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) ...................................................................... 12 2.2.3.2 Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) ....................................................... 12 2.2.3.3 Liriomyza sativae Blanchard ................................................................... 12 2.2.3.4 Liriomyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach) ............................................................ 12 2.2.3.5 Chromatomyia horticola (Goureau) ........................................................ 12 2.2.3.6 Liriomyza cicerina (Rondani) .................................................................. 13 2.3 Entry, establishment and spread................................................................................................. 13 2.4 Diagnostic information ................................................................................................................. 14 2.4.1 Diagnostic protocol .......................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Response checklist ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.5.1 Checklist ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.6 Delimiting survey and epidemiology study ................................................................................. 15 2.6.1 Sampling method ............................................................................................................. 15 2.6.2 Epidemiological study ...................................................................................................... 16 2.6.3 Models of spread potential .............................................................................................. 16 2.6.4 Pest Free Area (PFA) guidelines .................................................................................... 16 2.7 Availability of control methods ..................................................................................................... 17 2.7.1 General procedures for control ....................................................................................... 17 2.7.2 Control if small areas are affected .................................................................................. 17 Page 2 of 31 Contingency Plan – Liriomyza trifolii – American serpentine leafminer (bundled with L. cicerina, L. huidobrensis, L. sativae, L. bryoniae and Chromatomyia horticola) 2.7.3 Control if large areas are affected ................................................................................... 17 2.7.4 Cultural control ................................................................................................................. 17 2.7.5 Host plant resistance ....................................................................................................... 17 2.7.6 Chemical control .............................................................................................................. 18 2.7.7 Mechanical control ........................................................................................................... 18 2.7.8 Biological control .............................................................................................................. 18 3 Course of Action – Eradication Methods ...................................................................................... 18 3.1 Destruction strategy ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.1.1 Destruction protocols ....................................................................................................... 18 3.1.2 Decontamination protocols .............................................................................................. 19 3.1.3 Priorities............................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.4 Plants, by-products and waste processing ..................................................................... 19 3.1.5 Disposal issues ................................................................................................................ 19 3.2 Quarantine and movement controls ............................................................................................ 20 3.2.1 Quarantine priorities ........................................................................................................ 20 3.2.2 Movement control for people, plant material and machinery ......................................... 20 3.3 Zoning........................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.1 Destruction zone .............................................................................................................. 21 3.3.2 Quarantine zone .............................................................................................................. 21 3.3.3 Buffer zone ....................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.4 Restricted Area ................................................................................................................ 21 3.3.5 Control Area ..................................................................................................................... 21 3.4 Decontamination and farm clean up ........................................................................................... 21 3.4.1 Decontamination procedures .......................................................................................... 22 3.4.2 Decontamination if pest is identified in a small or large areas....................................... 22 3.4.3 General safety precautions ............................................................................................. 22 3.5 Surveillance
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Survey for the Invasive Leafminer Pest Liriomyza Huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in California Uncovers Only the Native Pest Liriomyza Langei
    Molecular Survey for the Invasive Leafminer Pest Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in California Uncovers Only the Native Pest Liriomyza langei Scheffer, S. J., Lewis, M. L., Gaimari, S. D., & Reitz, S. R. (2014). Molecular Survey for the Invasive Leafminer Pest Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in California Uncovers Only the Native Pest Liriomyza langei. Journal of Economic Entomology, 107(5), 1959-1964. doi:10.1603/EC13279 10.1603/EC13279 Entomological Society of America Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse MOLECULAR ENTOMOLOGY Molecular Survey for the Invasive Leafminer Pest Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in California Uncovers Only the Native Pest Liriomyza langei 1,2 1 3 4 SONJA J. SCHEFFER, MATTHEW L. LEWIS, STEPHEN D. GAIMARI, AND STUART R. REITZ J. Econ. Entomol. 107(5): 1959Ð1964 (2014); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC13279 ABSTRACT Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) is a highly destructive invasive leafminer pest currently causing extensive damage to vegetable and horticultural crops around the world. Liriomyza langei Frick is a leafminer pest native to California that cannot currently be morphologically distin- guished from L. huidobrensis. We used a DNA-barcoding approach, a published PCR-RFLP method, and a new multiplex PCR method to analyze 664 ßies matching the morphological description of huidobrensisÐlangei. We found no evidence for the presence of L. huidobrensis in our extensive samples from California. In addition to the new molecular method, this work is important because it provides deÞnitive data that the California “pea leafminer” is currently, and has probably always been, L. langei. These data will also be important in the event that the highly invasive L.
    [Show full text]
  • California Pea Leafminer, Liriomyza Langei (Diptera: Agromyzidae)
    DACS-P-01666 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner of Agriculture California Pea Leafminer, Liriomyza langei (Diptera: Agromyzidae) Gary J. Steck, [email protected], Taxonomic Entomologist, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry W. N. Dixon, [email protected], Bureau Chief, Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Liriomyza langei Frick is a dipteran (Agromyzidae) leaf miner (Fig. 1) that is considered a pest of economic importance in California. (http://www.doacs.state.fl.us/pi/enpp/ento/entcirc/ent378.pdf). Affected crops include field and glasshouse- grown vegetables and flowers. In Salinas Valley of Monterey Co., CA, “This insect has gone from a sporadic fall pest, relatively easily controlled, to a pest throughout most of the vegetable growing season that is essentially not able to be controlled in many crops. This is at least partly due to evolution of insecticide resistance; changes in tillage practices may also have contributed to the problem. Lettuce is the worst affected crop, but nearly all of the fresh vegetables grown in the area are hosts for this leafminer” (Chaney 1995). Other vegetable crops suffering severe economic loss include celery (Apium graveolens) and garden pea (Pisum sativum); floral crops include baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata), Chrsysanthemum, and Aster. BIOLOGY: Females puncture leaves to feed on plant sap and lay eggs within the leaf tissues. The eggs hatch after two to four days and larvae feed between the upper and lower surface of the leaves, making distinctive winding, whitish tunnels or mines that are often the first clue that leaf miners are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Paper
    J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2018 Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES) ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print) 2222-3045 (Online) Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 353-357, 2018 http://www.innspub.net RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Agromyzid leafminers and its natural enemies on vegetables (squash and tomato) in green houses Soolaf A. Kathiar*1, Nabaa A. Al Rada Mukuf2, Saja H. AL. Abdulameer1, Sawsan K. Flaih3 1Biology Department, College of Science for Women, University of Baghdad, Iraq 2Department of Higher Studies, University of Baghdad, Iraq 3Plant Protection Department, College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Iraq Article published on August 30, 2018 Key words: Agromyzid leafminers, Liriomyza bryoniae, Phytomyza horticola. Abstract In Iraq, the leafminer, is one of the most destructive pests of vegetables. Vegetable crops, such as squash Curcurbita pepo L. and tomatoes Solanum lycopersicum L were surveyed to record abundance and diversity of agromyzid leafminers and their natural enemy species. Population density of these pests were studied for the period from April to June 2014 in the College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad- Abu Ghraib. Two leafminers were detected, including Liriomyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach) on squash crop and Phytomyza horticola Gaureue on tomato crop. The results revealed that infestation by Leafminer, L. bryoniae and P. horticola were initiated on leaves situated on the median level of squash and tomato plants, then on leaves of lower level. Because, adults don’t tend to lay eggs on young leaves so that reflected on larval density on these leaves. The rate of larvae numbers of tested insect through the growth season showed that squash's and tomato's leaves of median level were more preferred for leafminer's larvae through the growth season.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir
    Importation of Fresh Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Shelled or in Pods, from Jordan into the Continental United States A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment February 14, 2011 Version 2 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Beans from Jordan Executive Summary In this risk assessment we examined the risks associated with the importation of fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in pods (French, green, snap, and string beans) or shelled, from the Kingdom of Jordan into the continental United States. We developed a list of pests associated with beans (in any country) that occur in Jordan on any host based on scientific literature, previous commodity risk assessments, records of intercepted pests at ports-of-entry, and information from experts on bean production. This is a qualitative risk assessment, as we express estimates of risk in descriptive terms (High, Medium, and Low) rather than numerically in probabilities or frequencies. We identified seven quarantine pests likely to follow the pathway of introduction. We estimated Consequences of Introduction by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate-host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact. We estimated Likelihood of Introduction values by considering both the quantity of the commodity imported annually and the potential for pest introduction and establishment. We summed the Consequences of Introduction and Likelihood of Introduction values to estimate overall Pest Risk Potentials, which describe risk in the absence of mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Parasitoids of the Serpentine Leaf Miner, Liriomyza Trifolii (Burgess) in Tomato Ecosystem Under Mid Hill Condition of Himachal Pradesh
    Journal of Biological Control, 25 (4): 320–322, 2011 Research Note Studies on the parasitoids of the serpentine leaf miner, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) in tomato ecosystem under mid hill condition of Himachal Pradesh P. L. SHARMA, U*, CHAUHAN, P. R. GUPTA, K. C. SHARMA and S. P. VERMA Department of Entomology and Apiculture, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (HP) India 173 230 * Corresponding author E mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The species diversity of parasitoids of the serpentine leaf miner, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) in tomato ecosystem was conducted under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh during 2008-2010. The tomato leaves were collected periodically from June to September from three strata i.e. bottom, middle and top portion of the plants at random. During the course of study four species of larval parasitoids viz., Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood), Diglyphus sp., Asecodes sp. and Chrysocharis sp. belonging to the family Eulophidae and one species of larval-pupal parasitoid, Opius sp. belonging to the family Braconidae were identified. These parasitoids were active throughout the cropping season and the parasitization ranged from 6.0 – 21.1, 19.4 – 28.6 and 13.6 – 23.1 per cent during 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. It was maximum (20.1 – 28.6%) during the month of August. Marginally higher parasitization (14.3 – 26.7%) was observed in the middle stratum of the foliage than in top (11.1 – 24.0%) or bottom (6.7 – 20.0%) stratum during all the three years of study. Among the larval parasitoids, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Comments on Regulatory Options for Pea Leaf Miner
    FOR INFORMATION AND ACTION DA-2008-76 December 19, 2008 SUBJECT: Request for Comments on Regulatory Options for Pea Leaf Miner TO: STATE AND TERRITORY AGRICULTURAL REGULATORY OFFICIALS The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is soliciting your comments to help us determine options for the continued regulation of Liriomyza huidobrensis, commonly known as pea leaf miner. Pea leaf miner is an exotic, highly polyphagous leaf miner capable of inflicting severe damage to crops such as field- and glasshouse-grown vegetables and flowers. Pea leaf miner is a mining fly of the insect family Agromyzidae. Pea leaf miner can be found in Asia, Africa, Central and South America, Europe, the Middle East, and Oceania. This fly was also considered to be present in the States of California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. However, there is now evidence that the fly in the United States previously believed to be pea leaf miner is not Liriomyza huidobrensis. Research has identified the fly present in the United States as Liriomyza langei. The fly was differentiated by molecular diagnosis from pea leaf miner but is morphologically almost identical. This research is summarized in the attached Center for Plant Health Science and Technology (CPHST) report entitled, “Is Liriomyza langei a real species or a biotype of L. huidobrensis?”. For regulatory purposes, APHIS believes that pea leaf miner and L. langei can be considered different species and distinct taxa. However, we recognize that we should not regulate one fly and not the other without scientific evidence indicating biological differences affecting pest character between species so taxonomically similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Liriomyza Leafminers: Progress and Perspective
    CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2009 4, No. 004 Review Biological control of Liriomyza leafminers: progress and perspective Tong-Xian Liu1*, Le Kang2, Kevin M. Heinz3 and John Trumble4 Address: 1 Department of Entomology, Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, 2415 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA. 2 State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. 3 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. 4 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA. *Correspondence: Tong-Xian Liu. Fax. 01 956-968-0641. Email: [email protected] Received: 6 October 2008 Accepted: 15 December 2008 doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20094004 The electronic version of this article is the definitive one. It is located here: http://www.cababstractsplus.org/cabreviews g CAB International 2008 (Online ISSN 1749-8848) Abstract There are more than 330 Liriomyza species (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and many are economically important pests of field crops, ornamentals and vegetables. Given the substantial economic losses associated with various aspects of Liriomyza feeding as well as the ability of these insects to rapidly develop resistance to insecticides, researchers from many countries have attempted to use bio- logical control to manage these pests. Unfortunately, progress on the science and implementation of effective Liriomyza biological control is hampered by the literature being scattered widely and in many different languages. A primary goal of this review is to consolidate the available infor- mation and provide an analysis of the published work.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf Miner Species CP
    Contingency Plan – Cereal Leafminers (Agromyza ambigua, A. megalopsis, Cerodontha denticornis, Chromatomyia fuscula, Ch. nigra) Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Grains Industry Threat Specific Contingency Plan Cereal Leafminers Agromyza ambigua, Agromyza megalopsis, Cerodontha denticornis, Chromatomyia fuscula, Chromatomyia nigra Prepared by Dr Peter Ridland and Plant Health Australia January 2009 Disclaimer: The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Page 1 of 40 Contingency Plan – Cereal Leafminers (Agromyza ambigua, A. megalopsis, Cerodontha denticornis, Chromatomyia fuscula, Ch. nigra) 1 Purpose of this Contingency Plan.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster-Bean-Ipm-For-Export.Pdf
    found free from insect pests then the field will be Trichoderma sp. and Pseudomonas sp. @ 2 kg per acre Integrated Pest Management considered fit for export. as seed / nursery treatment and soil application for (IPM) in Cluster bean (Guar) III. Integrated Pest Management strategies controlling soil borne disease such as root rot, wilting. (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) for The following Good Agricultural Practices should be Apply neem cake @ 100 kg per acre for reducing export purpose adopted for the management of various pests of cluster nematode population. bean: Destruction of debris, crop residues, weeds & other alternate hosts Deep summer ploughing Frequent raking of soil beneath the crop to expose and kill the eggs, grubs & pupa. Biodiversity in natural enemies: Parasitoids Hand collection and destruction of infested leaves and fruits. Adoption of proper crop rotation and avoid growing of cucurbit crops in sequence. Use of resistant and tolerant varieties recommended by Biodiversity in natural enemies: Predators the State Agricultural Universities of the region. Early maturing varieties are less affected by fruit flies than CIB&RC recommended pesticide against cluster bean pests later ones. Slight raking of soil during fruiting time and after the Dosage harvest to expose pupae from the soil. Pest/Pesticide a.i. Formulatio Dilution Waiting Use cue-lure traps to attract B. cucurbitae males. (gm) n(gm/litre) (Litre) period Use poison bait against fruit fly-mix 500 gm jaggery, 20 ml malathion and keeping plastic containers Pod borer (100ml/container) @ 5 nos/Acre for monitoring and Chlorpyrifos 20% 600 3000 500- - Dr. S. N. Sushil, Plant Protection Adviser 20/acre for mass killing of fruit fly.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.1.4 Halticoptera Arduine (Walker 1843) Synonyms: Dicyclus Arduine
    5.1.4 Halticoptera arduine (Walker 1843) Synonyms: Dicyclus arduine (Walker 1843) Halticoptera arduine (Walker 1843) Taxonomic position: Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae: Miscogastrinae Authors: N. Mujica, C. Prudencio, P. Carhuapoma, & J. Kroschel Hosts Halticoptera arduine is found parasitizing leafminer species (Diptera: Agromyzidae) of economic importance such as Amauromyza maculosa (Malloch) in Lacttuca sp. and Chrysantemum sp., Cerodontha dorsalis (Loew) in cereals; Japanagromyza Sasakawa in Phaseolus sp., Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard), Liriomyza sativae Blanchard, and L. trifolii (Burgess) in vegetables; Liriomyza graminivora Hering in maize (Zea mays L.); and Liriomyza quadrata Malloch in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.). Also, H. arduine has been recovered from leafminer flies of minor importance infesting wild plants such as Amauromyza Hendel sp., Calycomyza malvae (Burgess), Calycomyza Hendel, Chromatomyia platensis (Brethes), Liriomyza commelinae Frost, Liriomyza sabaziae Spencer, and Melanagromyza Hendel. Morphology Egg Eggs are 0.4 x 0.15 mm in size and are hymenopteriform; a caudal extension with three hooks (like an anchor) allows the egg to adhere to the internal organs of the host. Corium is transparent and smooth, pale yellow. Larva Four larval instars are described. First instar is hymenopteriform (0.35 x 0.15 mm) with 13 segments, including the conical cephalic capsule with triangular mandibles that are the most sclerotic part of the body. Second (1.93 x 1.04 mm) and third (2.29 x 1.30 mm) instars are vermiform (Photo 1A). Fourth instar is typically hymenopteriform with 13 segments, showing the oral region in the cephalic segment (2.49 x 1.34 mm). Pupa Pupation occurs within the host puparium.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics, Efficacy of Botanical Extracts and Synthetic
    International Journal of Applied Research 2015; 1(12): 758-761 ISSN Print: 2394-7500 ISSN Online: 2394-5869 Impact Factor: 5.2 Population Dynamics, Efficacy of Botanical Extracts IJAR 2015; 1(12): 758-761 www.allresearchjournal.com and Synthetic Insecticides for The Control of Pea Leaf Received: 24-09-2015 Accepted: 27-10-2015 Miner (Phytomyza horticola Goureau) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) Under the Climatic Conditions of Syed Arif Hussain Rizvi Department of Entomology, Baltistan, Pakistan the University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan Muhammad Nadeem Ikhlaq Syed Arif Hussain Rizvi, Muhammad Nadeem Ikhlaq, Saleem Jaffar, Department of Entomology, Shahid Hussain the University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan Abstract Saleem Jaffar Field Studies were carried out for the effective management of Pea Leaf Miner (Phytomyza horticola Department of Entomology, Goureau) through synthetic insecticides CURACRON®, Belt ® and botanical extracts of Almond the University of Agriculture Extract, @3.00%, Walnut Extract @3.00 on seasonal plots of Pea plant at Baltistan region during 2015- Peshawar, Pakistan 16.The treatments were applied at their calculated doses, when 3-5 leaves per plant were emerged in the experimental plot. After application of treatments data were taken as by counting number of damaged Shahid Hussain leaves per plant from selected five pea plant in each plot. Data were noted as damaged leaves per plant Department of Plant after 1st week, 2nd week, 3rd week, 4th week and 5th week respectively. Overall percent damage per plant Pathology Sind Agriculture by Pea Leaf Miner, showed that statistically all the treatments were non-significant to each other but University Tandojam Pakistan significantly different from control plot.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Liriomyza Leafminers: Progress and Perspective
    CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2009 4, No. 004 Review Biological control of Liriomyza leafminers: progress and perspective Tong-Xian Liu1*, Le Kang2, Kevin M. Heinz3 and John Trumble4 Address: 1 Department of Entomology, Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, 2415 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA. 2 State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. 3 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. 4 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA. *Correspondence: Tong-Xian Liu. Fax. 01 956-968-0641. Email: [email protected] Received: 6 October 2008 Accepted: 15 December 2008 doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20094004 The electronic version of this article is the definitive one. It is located here: http://www.cababstractsplus.org/cabreviews g CAB International 2008 (Online ISSN 1749-8848) Abstract There are more than 330 Liriomyza species (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and many are economically important pests of field crops, ornamentals and vegetables. Given the substantial economic losses associated with various aspects of Liriomyza feeding as well as the ability of these insects to rapidly develop resistance to insecticides, researchers from many countries have attempted to use bio- logical control to manage these pests. Unfortunately, progress on the science and implementation of effective Liriomyza biological control is hampered by the literature being scattered widely and in many different languages. A primary goal of this review is to consolidate the available infor- mation and provide an analysis of the published work.
    [Show full text]