DOCSLIB.ORG

Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Demographics & Data Industry Role The Novogradac Financing Syndication Renewable Energy Conference Law 4% Investing/ 21% brought together the most LendingSyndication 10% Law Syndication4% forward-thinking professionals Investing/ Law 4% 21% DevelopmentInvesting/Lending14%10% 21% 18% Banking/ from the industry to discuss Lending 10% Finance the legislative and market Development 14% 18% Banking/ Accounting Finance Development 14%15% 18% 18%Other Banking/Energy dynamics driving renewable Finance energy activity. As we prepare Accounting 15% 18% Other Energy Accounting Region 15% 18% Other Energy for a very busy 2015 and 2016, it was invaluable for both 19% 43% 15% West Midwest Northeast newcomers and experienced 19% practitioners alike to access 43% 15% West Midwest19%23% Northeast 43% South 15% West Midwest Northeast rich educational content and 23% networking opportunities— South23% South further ensuring they remain competitive in this ever- changing marketplace. Top 5 States 32% 9% 8% 7% 5% California Missouri Washington New York Colorado D.C. Stephen Tracy 32% 9% 8% 7% 5% California32% Missouri9% Washington8% New7% York Colorado5% Conference Chairman California Missouri WashingtonD.C. New York Colorado D.C. Novogradac & Company LLP #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Networking Face-to-face interaction is vital to driving activity in the renewable energy industry. The conference luncheon and networking reception were pivotal in providing attendees with the opportunity to discuss the day’s takeaways, develop new business and strengthen existing relationships. Renewable Energy Power Awards The Renewable Energy Power Awards ceremony, presented by the Novogradac Journal of Tax Credits, recognized three innovative projects that had a positive impact on job creation and the energy footprint of their communities. Winners included Urban Greenfit LLC for its Roosevelt Landings Project, SunEdison Inc. for its Regulus Solar Project, and Affirmed Housing Group for its Arbor Green development. #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Education The conference offered cutting- edge professional education. Guided by the industry’s most influential experts, session topics focused on the innovative financing and deal structures driving down today’s cost of capital for renewable energy projects. Project Finance Advanced Primer In this interactive workshop, project finance experts discussed analytical and strategic techniques for successfully structuring renewable energy transactions. Attendees participated in group discussions and advanced financial modeling exercises. #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Conference Agenda At-A-Glance with Presentations Thurs., April 23, 2015 8–9 a.m. Registration and Breakfast 9–9:15 a.m. Noon–1:15 p.m. Welcome Address Luncheon 9:15–10:15 a.m. 1:15–2:15 p.m. Washington Report Download Sponsor/Developer Presentation and Industry Update Financing Issues 10:30–11:45 a.m. 2:30–3:30 p.m. A Deeper Look into Download Debt Market Presentation YieldCos Update 11:45 a.m.–Noon 3:45–5 p.m. Renewable Energy Tax Equity Update Power Awards 5–6:30 p.m. Reception Fri., April 24, 2015 9–9:50 a.m. 11:10 a.m.–Noon Download Presentation Energy Storage– Download PACE Financing What Does the Presentation Future Look Like? Noon Conference Concludes 10–11 a.m. Current Issues– Closing a Renewable Energy Transaction #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Thank You to Our Co-Hosts and Sponsors Co-Hosts Sponsors #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Project Finance Advanced Primer Attendees John Albrecht, Recurrent Energy Inc. Trevor Hill, SunPower Corporation Darren Anderson, Capital Power Jetson Hollingsworth, Butler Snow LLP Ola Assem, Cleopatra Inc. Jake Hoppe, Enphase Joe Avedisian, Novogradac & Company LLP Masatoshi Ito, Development Bank of Japan Inc. Gary Band, Nixon Peabody LLP Jennifer Kerrigan, Blanco Tackabery Nico Barawid, SunEdison Pat Kilcullen, Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus Inc. Alana Becquette, SunEdison Eric Klipfer, RBC Capital Markets Thomas Boman, Novogradac & Company LLP Alan Knudson, Basin Energy Services LC Jeffrey Buzen, Aon Risk Services Said Kordestani, Farella Braun + Martel LLP Luis Castellanos, Novogradac & Company LLP Michael Kremer, Cypress Creek Renewables Shilpi Jethani Chavda, SunEdison Alvin Lee, Novogradac & Company LLP Jae Choe, LG International (America) Inc. Sean Lee, LG International (America) Inc. Erin Chui, Novogradac & Company LLP Zarek Lee, Sempra Energy Yonette Chung, RBC Capital Markets Ken Lehman, Kendall Investments Christa Clark, Arkansas Capital Corporation Matthew Lockhart, Novogradac & Company LLP Gregory Clements, Novogradac & Company LLP Jennifer Ma, Novogradac & Company LLP Sean Collins, Novogradac & Company LLP Mary Beth Mandanas, RBC Capital Markets Genni Combes, Sungevity Mike Maniscalco, Bay4 Energy Services/Kenyon Thomas Crofts, Partners Capital Managment Energy Michael Cung, King-Solarman Scott Manning, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP David Davenport, Urban Greenfit LLC David Maurer, F&M Capital Michael Deeg, Baltra Consulting LLC Mark McCreery, MuniStrategies LLC J.R. Dehring, IGS Energy Macon McDonald, West Company of Midland Nimisha Dharam, NRG Energy Inc. Euan McNair, SunEdison Elaine DiPietro, Enterprise Community Investment John Meredith, F&M Capital Inc. Cliff Mesner, Mesner Development Co. Neal Divver, Sunrun Inc. Kathy Mesner, Mesner Development Co. Ed Dunne, NRG Energy Inc. Jon Miller, Gardner Capital Inc. Chad Durden, Novogradac & Company LLP Richard Millett, W.G. Nielsen & Co. Nat Eng, Novogradac & Company LLP Nigel Morton, SunEdison Kristie Espiritu, Sempra Energy Craig Mulcahy, Mahoney Ulbrich Christiansen & Tom Fantin, Novogradac & Company LLP Russ PA Rich Fenske, DynaSolar EPCM Stephanie Murr, National Cooperative Bank Adam Flock, Sempra Energy Mary Margaret (Mo) Ogburn, Blanco Tackabery Lori Fowler, Sungevity Tony Parisi, Dynamic Energy Tyler Gibbs, Novogradac & Company LLP Kathy Parker, Rodman & Rodman PC Nicole Greenfiled, Cypress Creek Renewables Abhi Parmar, Altus Power America Joel Griffiths, Leverage Law Group LLC Sam Paules, Diamond Ridge Development Whitney Hampton, U.S. Bancorp Community David Peterson, APS Development Corporation Sara Pietka, Roeder & Company LLC Bo Harwell, Butler Snow LLP Mark Purser, NRG Energy Katie Heath, Blanco Tackabery Reynold Roeder, Roeder & Company LLC #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Project Finance Advanced Primer Attendees Pablo Rosas, Novogradac & Company LLP Todd Travis, National Foundation For Affordable Glenn Sansbury, Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection Housing Solutions Inc. (NFAHS) And Insurance Thomas Treinen, NRG Home Solar Monica Schmidt, Crowe Horwath Kimberly Vanderlaan, Neighborhood Power Jennifer Simmons, Thompson Coburn LLP Corporation Matthew Simpson, Mintz Levin Steven Varady, Novogradac & Company LLP Francesco Spagnolo, Building Energy Steve Waack, SunEdison Michael Sponseller, Sungevity Dustin Weber, Altus Power America Todd Surbey, RBC Capital Markets Laura Weingartner, Dykema Gossett PLLC Aileen Thomas, Jones Walker LLP Tami Wilson, IGS Energy H. Shaw Thomas, Vectra Bank Colorado Dean Yamamoto, Yamamoto Caliboso Jennifer Thomas, American Solar Direct Inc. Phillip Yim, Novogradac & Company LLP Scott Toburen, Novogradac & Company LLP Daniel Yonkin, Sol Systems LLC Stephen Tracy, Novogradac & Company LLP Matt Yunker, Novogradac & Company LLP Tong Tran, Novogradac & Company LLP #NovocoRETC novoco.com/vegasenergy.php Financing Renewable Energy Conference TAKE CONFERENCE SURVEY Conference Attendees John Albrecht, Recurrent Energy Inc. Luis Castellanos, Novogradac & Company LLP Morgan Allen, Global X Ben Catt, FLS Energy Inc. Adam Altenhofen, U.S. Bancorp Community Jason Cavaliere, Sunrun Inc. Development Corporation Christy Chang, Intel Corp. Darren Anderson, Capital Power Paul Charron, Novogradac & Company LLP Brian Ashin, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Shilpi Jethani Chavda, SunEdison Ola Assem, Cleopatra Inc. Michelle Chen, Bridge Bank Tom Athan, Altus Power America Jeffrey Cheng, Stion Energy Services Larry Baerveldt, U.S. Bancorp Community Jae Choe, LG International (America) Inc. Development Corporation Yonette Chung, RBC Capital Markets Andrae Baly, National Trust Community Investment Ed Cichon, Marathon Energy LLC Corp. (NTCIC) Christa Clark, Heartland Renaissance Fund LLC Gary Band, Nixon Peabody LLP Gregory Clements, Novogradac & Company LLP George Barry, Foss And Company Richard Cogen, Nixon Peabody LLP Randy Bartholomew, National Trust Community Abby Cohen, Novogradac & Company LLP Investment Corp. (NTCIC) Mike Cohen, Cypress Creek Renewables Tim Beach, Media Venture Partners Sean Collins, Novogradac & Company LLP Alana Becquette, SunEdison Genni Combes, Sungevity Joe Benga, Gardner Capital Inc. Brian Confrey, Ernst & Young Marcelo Bermudez, DC Solar Anthony Conklin, Entropy Solar Integrators LLC Alexandra Bernard, Novogradac & Company LLP Mercedes Crouthamel, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Paul Bernardino, Aon Strategic Advisors & Company Transaction Solutions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solar ABS 101
    Project Bond Focus U.S. Residential Solar ABS 101 U.S. Residential Solar ABS 101 ABC Introduction and PPAs contracts is typically responsible for the installation and maintenance of the solar equipment throughout the term of the contract. Asset-backed securities (ABS) secured by residential solar financing contracts continue to emerge as a new sector of Leases the U.S. securitization market. The key drivers of expansion are the overall growth of the U.S. rooftop solar market, as Customers pay a fixed amount per month, generally well as institutional investors' increasing comfort for this escalating every year and benefiting from the production of new asset class. the panels installed by the developer providing the lease, regardless of actual consumption. The contracts typically The residential solar sector has experienced solid growth in include a minimum production guarantee to mitigate the risk recent years, with a peak of more than 2.5GW of capacity of equipment underperformance. The minimum production installed in 2016, representing approximately 325 thousand guarantee payments are typically made by the installers to households. After a 16% decrease in installation in 2017 the homeowner and do not reduce lease payments (no due to lower customer acquisition in California and netting). In some contracts, true-up payments at year-end Northeastern states, as well as regulatory uncertainty in may be required for over/under performance. Nevada, the residential solar market grew by 7% in 2018. Historically leading states seem to be transitioning to more PPAs stable growth rates, while Texas, Florida and Nevada are Homeowners pay every month for the actual solar energy experiencing higher growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the PACE: Financing Commercial Retrofits
    Setting the PACE: Financing Commercial Retrofits Issue Brief Katrina Managan Program Manager, Institute for Building Efficiency, Johnson Controls Kristina Klimovich Associate, PACENow This report is the result of collaboration by the Johnson Controls Institute for Building Efficiency, PACENow, and the Urban Land Institute. February 2013 Table of Contents Introduction . 3 The Opportunity . 4 Background on PACE . 4 Early History of PACE . 5 PACE Market Activity Today . 6 PACE Financing . 7 Advantages of PACE Financing . 8 Financing Models . 10 Municipal Bond Funded Model (Figure 4) . 10 Privately Funded Model (Figure 5) . 11 Model Examples and Implications . 12 Program Administration . .13 Eligible Technologies and Projects . 14 Technologies and Measures . 14 Toledo, Ohio . 15 Transaction Size . 15 Loading Order Requirements . 16 Minimum Energy Savings Requirement . 17 Eligible Asset Classes, Target Market . 18 Building Owner Engagement . 18 Marketing and Outreach . 19 PACE Project Process . 20 Prologis HQ in San Francisco . 21 Conclusion. 22 Appendix 1: Research Methodology and Interview Questions . 23 Appendix 2: Active PACE Programs as of January 2013 . 24 Appendix 3: Building Efficiency Financing Options . 25 Appendix 4: Efficiency Measures Eligible in Each Program . 26 Appendix 5: Acknowledgements. 27 2 Institute for Building Efficiency www.InstituteBE.com Introduction Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) finance is a new and growing municipal approach to support energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades in commercial buildings in the United States. As of February 2013, there were 16 commercial PACE programs accepting applications to finance building efficiency projects. Most of these have been active for less than a year, and some are just now working on their first projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6. Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms
    Chapter 6 Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms for Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Deployment in China Sufang Zhang April 2016 This chapter should be cited as Zhang, S. (2015), ‘Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms for Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Deployment in China’, in Kimura, S., Y. Chang and Y. Li (eds.), Financing Renewable Energy Development in East Asia Summit Countries. ERIA Research Project Report 2014-27, Jakarta: ERIA, pp.161-191. Chapter 6 Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms for Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Deployment in China17 Sufang Zhang Abstract Following my report ‘Analysis of Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Power Policy in China’, this report looks into innovative business models and financing mechanisms for distributed solar photovoltaic power in China by reviewing existing literature and conducting interactive research, including discussions with managers from China’s policy and commercial banks, and photovoltaic projects. It first provides a comprehensive review of literature on business models and financing mechanisms. Then, the paper looks into the rapidly evolving business models and financing mechanisms in the United States, one of the countries leading the deployment of DSPV. The emerging innovative business models and financing mechanisms for DSPV projects in China are next discussed. The report concludes that: (a) innovative business models and financing mechanisms are important drivers for the growth of DSPV power in the United States; (b) enabling policies are determinant components of innovative business models and financing mechanisms in the country; (c) innovative business models and financing mechanisms in the Chinese context have their advantages and disadvantages; and (d) support through government policies is imperative to address the challenges in the emerging innovative business models and financing mechanisms in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Solar Leasing Boom in California
    Improving Solar Policy: Lessons from the solar leasing boom in California Climate Policy Initiative Andrew Hobbs Elinor Benami Uday Varadarajan Brendan Pierpont July 2013 A CPI Report Acknowledgements The authors thank the following organizations and professionals for their collaboration and input: Marzia Zafar and Robert Kinosian of CPUC, Michael Mendelsohn, Carolyn Davidson,and Easan Drury of NREL; Varun Rai and Ben Sig- rin of University of Texas – Austin; Jorge Medina and John Stanton of Solar City; Holly Gordon and Walker Wright of Sun Run, Darren Deffner of SEPA; Philip Shen of Roth Capital; Kevin Hurst of the U.S. Office of Science and Technol- ogy Policy, James Fine of the Environmental Defense Fund, Judson Jaffe of the U.S. Treasury; and Eric Gimon of the Vote Solar Initiative. The perspectives expressed here are CPI’s own. Finally the authors would like to acknowledge inputs, comments and internal review from CPI staff: David Nelson, Jeff Deason, Kath Rowley, Rodney Boyd, Wenjuan Dong, Tim Varga, Elysha Rom-Povolo, and Ruby Barcklay. Descriptors Sector Renewable Energy Region U.S. Keywords Solar; PV; leasing; business models; renewable energy Contact Andrew Hobbs [email protected] About CPI Climate Policy Initiative is a team of analysts and advisors that works to improve the most important energy and land use policies around the world, with a particular focus on finance. An independent organization supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations, CPI works in places that provide the most potential for policy impact including Brazil, China, Europe, India, Indonesia, and the United States. Copyright © 2013 Climate Policy Initiative www.climatepolicyinitiative.org All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLEAN ENERGY FINANCE GUIDE Chapter 12. Commercial Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing Third Edition Update, March 2013 Introduction Summary The property-assessed clean energy (PACE) model is an innovative mechanism for financing energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements on private property. PACE programs allow local governments, state governments, or other inter-jurisdictional authorities, when authorized by state law, to fund the up-front cost of energy improvements on commercial and residential properties, which are paid back over time by the property owners. PACE financing for clean energy projects is generally based on an existing structure known as a “land- secured financing district,” often referred to as an assessment district, a local improvement district, or other similar phrase. In a typical assessment district, the local government issues bonds to fund projects with a public purpose such as streetlights, sewer systems, or underground utility lines. The recent extension of this financing model to energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy (RE) allows a property owner to implement improvements without a large up-front cash payment. Property owners voluntarily choose to participate in a PACE program repay their improvement costs over a set time period—typically 10 to 20 years—through property assessments, which are secured by the property itself and paid as an addition to the owners’ property tax bills. Nonpayment generally results in the same set of repercussions as the failure to pay any other portion of a property tax bill. The PACE Process *Depending upon program the structure, the lender may be a private capital provider or the local jurisdiction A PACE assessment is a debt of property, meaning the debt is tied to the property as opposed to the property owner(s), so the repayment obligation may transfers with property ownership depending upon state legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • PACE) Financing
    Frequently Asked Questions about Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing General Questions What is PACE? Property assessed clean energy, or PACE, financing allows property owners to fund energy efficiency, water efficiency and renewable energy projects with little or no up-front costs. With PACE, eligible property owners living within a local government area that has adopted PACE can finance up to 100% of their project and pay it back over time as a voluntary property tax assessment through their existing property tax bill. Who administers PACE programs in Minnesota? Two public entities operate PACE programs: [1] the St. Paul Port Authority (SPPA) and the [2] Rural Minnesota Energy Board (RMEB). The St. Paul Port Authority is authorized to administer a PACE program after a city or county enters into a joint powers agreement with the SPPA. While the St. Paul Port Authority’s primary mission is to finance business expansion in the east metropolitan region, the authority operates a PACE program statewide, on behalf of the state Department of Commerce. Learn more about the Saint Paul Port Authority program. The Rural Minnesota Energy Board is an 18 county Joint Powers Board staffed by the Southwest Regional Development commission (SRDC). RMEB operates a separate PACE program for its member counties. RMEB counties include Cottonwood, Jackson, Lincoln, Lyon, Murray, Nobles, Pipestone, Redwood, Rock, Renville, Sibley, Brown, Watonwan, Blue Earth, Mower, Freeborn, Faribault and Martin. Learn more about the Rural Minnesota Energy Board program. How is this different from a traditional loan? PACE is a special assessment, commonly referred to as a PACE assessment, for a benefit tied to the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Energy-Efficiency and Renewable-Energy Projects Public Equity Instruments: an Analysis of Reits, MLPS and Yieldcos
    National Institute of Council on Finance, BUILDING SCIENCES Insurance and Real Estate Financing Energy-Efficiency and Renewable-Energy Projects Public Equity Instruments: An Analysis of REITs, MLPS and Yieldcos An Authoritative Source of Innovative Solutions for the Built Environment National Institute of BUILDING SCIENCES Financing Energy-Efficiency and Renewable-Energy Projects Public Equity Instruments: An Analysis of REITs, MLPS and Yieldcos developed by the Council on Finance, Insurance and Real Estate (CFIRE) An Authoritative Source of Innovative Solutions for the Built Environment Financing Energy-Efficiency and Renewable-Energy Projects Public Equity Instruments: An Analysis of REITs, MLPs and Yieldcos Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Financing Energy-Smart Buildings and Renewables through REITs............................. 3 Renewable Energy Finance............................................................................................. 5 Master Limited Partnerships ........................................................................................... 5 Yieldcos .......................................................................................................................... 6 The Role of Federal Tax Incentives ................................................................................ 7 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009
    US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009 Thursday, April 15, 2010 575 7th Street NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20004 | www.seia.org Executive Summary U.S. Cumulative Solar Capacity Growth Despite the Great Recession of 2009, the U.S. solar energy 2,500 25,000 23,835 industry grew— both in new installations and 2,000 20,000 employment. Total U.S. solar electric capacity from 15,870 2,108 photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) 1,500 15,000 technologies climbed past 2,000 MW, enough to serve -th MW more than 350,000 homes. Total U.S. solar thermal 1,000 10,000 MW 1 capacity approached 24,000 MWth. Solar industry 494 revenues also surged despite the economy, climbing 500 5,000 36 percent in 2009. - - A doubling in size of the residential PV market and three new CSP plants helped lift the U.S. solar electric market 37 percent in annual installations over 2008 from 351 MW in 2008 to 481 MW in 2009. Solar water heating (SWH) Electricity Capacity (MW) Thermal Capacity (MW-Th) installations managed 10 percent year-over-year growth, while the solar pool heating (SPH) market suffered along Annual U.S. Solar Energy Capacity Growth with the broader construction industry, dropping 10 1,200 1,099 percent. 1,036 1,000 918 894 928 Another sign of continued optimism in solar energy: 865 -th 725 758 742 venture capitalists invested more in solar technologies than 800 542 any other clean technology in 2009. In total, $1.4 billion in 600 481 2 351 venture capital flowed to solar companies in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No
    WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No. Of Notice Date Effective Date Received Date Company City County Employees Layoff/Closure 06/10/2020 06/09/2020 06/30/2020 Harbor Bay Club, Inc Alameda Alameda County 80 Layoff Temporary 03/20/2020 03/20/2020 06/30/2020 MD2 Industries, LLC Long Beach Los Angeles County 109 Closure Temporary 06/30/2020 08/21/2020 06/30/2020 NBCUniversal Media, LLC - Digital Lab Unit Universal City Los Angeles County 28 Layoff Temporary 04/22/2020 06/22/2020 06/30/2020 House of Blues Anaheim Anaheim Orange County 8 Closure Temporary 06/29/2020 08/01/2020 06/30/2020 ADESA California, LLC dba ADESA/AFC Los Mira Loma Riverside County 71 Layoff Permanent Angeles 06/17/2020 06/17/2020 06/30/2020 K&N Engineering, Inc. Riverside Riverside County 44 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 07/28/2020 06/30/2020 Benchmark Arrowhead, LLC dba Lake Lake Arrowhead San Bernardino County 114 Layoff Permanent Arrowhead Resort and Spa 06/18/2020 07/06/2020 06/30/2020 HOWMET Aerospace Fontana San Bernardino County 75 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 47 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 46 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 84 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 37 Layoff Temporary 06/08/2020 03/30/2020 06/30/2020 SmartCareMD Escondido San Diego County 38 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/31/2020 06/30/2020 Stryker Employment Company Menlo Park San Mateo County 33 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/29/2020 06/30/2020 Nitto, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Vision 2012 Annual Report Executive Summary
    CITY OF SAN JOSE Green Vision 2Annual012 Report Including Tips For A Greener Community Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................. i-viii Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Strategic Framework..................................................................................................... 2 Climate Change ............................................................................................................. 3 Clean Tech Jobs............................................................................................................ 5 Reduced Energy Use .................................................................................................. 14 Renewable Energy ...................................................................................................... 24 Green Buildings........................................................................................................... 29 Zero Waste................................................................................................................... 34 Recycled Water ........................................................................................................... 45 Sustainable Development........................................................................................... 49 Clean Fleet Vehicles...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Just Energy Selects Sungevity to Grow Solar Footprint in Leading U.S
    JUST ENERGY SELECTS SUNGEVITY TO GROW SOLAR FOOTPRINT IN LEADING U.S. MARKETS --Energy Solutions Leader with Nearly Two Million Customers to Leverage Sungevity’s Marketing and Sales Platform-- OAKLAND, CA, and TORONTO, ONTARIO – (November 30, 2016) - Sungevity, Inc., a technology company whose platform enables the sale and installation of solar energy systems to residential and commercial customers in the United States and internationally, and Just Energy Group Inc. (NYSE:JE, TSX:JE), an energy management solutions provider specializing in electricity and natural gas commodities, energy efficiency solutions, and renewable energy options, today announced a partnership aimed at accelerating solar adoption in several of the leading U.S. solar markets. Commencing in January 2017, Just Energy will leverage Sungevity’s industry-leading platform to sell Sungevity Energy Systems to customers in California, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York, four of the top ten solar markets1 in the nation according to the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA). Just Energy services nearly two million customers in North America and the UK with energy solutions, including green energy product options and energy efficient programs that empower customers to support a cleaner environment. Sungevity directly services solar customers across the U.S. and Europe, and also leverages its innovative platform with a broad range of strategic partners to rapidly scale its business. The two companies share a customer-centric approach to business and will work together through this partnership to provide residential customers with best-in-class solar products and services. “As a proven leader in energy management solutions, we were looking for the best partner to scale our solar offering,” said Deb Merril, President and Co-CEO at Just Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla, Inc. Form 10-K Annual Report Filed 2017-03-01
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2017-03-01 | Period of Report: 2016-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001564590-17-003118 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Tesla, Inc. Mailing Address Business Address 3500 DEER CREEK RD 3500 DEER CREEK RD CIK:1318605| IRS No.: 912197729 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 PALO ALTO CA 94070 PALO ALTO CA 94070 Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-34756 | Film No.: 17655025 650-681-5000 SIC: 3711 Motor vehicles & passenger car bodies Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-34756 Tesla, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 91-2197729 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 3500 Deer Creek Road Palo Alto, California 94304 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (650) 681-5000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.001 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]