DOCSLIB.ORG

Abundant Splits in Consumer and Reorganization Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abundant Splits in Consumer and Reorganization Law Abundant Splits in Consumer and Reorganization Law 31st Annual Bankruptcy at the Beach Alabama State Bar Association Destin, Florida June 8-9, 2018 Bill Rochelle • Editor-at-Large American Bankruptcy Institute [email protected] • 703. 894.5909 © 2018 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22014 • www.abi.org American Bankruptcy Institute • 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22314 1 www.abi.org Table of Contents Supreme Court ........................................................................................................................ 4 Decided Last Term ........................................................................................................................... 5 Supreme Court Reverses Jevic, Bars Structured Dismissals that Violate Priority Rules .............. 6 Supreme Court Allows Debt Collectors to File Time-Barred Proofs of Claim ............................. 9 A Debt Purchaser Is Not a ‘Debt Collector’ Regulated by the FDCPA, Supreme Court Holds .. 12 Did the Supreme Court Hint that Bankruptcy Venue Is Too Broad? .......................................... 14 This Term........................................................................................................................................ 18 Supreme Court Narrowly Interprets the Safe Harbor, Overrules the Majority of Circuits .......... 19 Supreme Court Says Insider Status Is Reviewed for Clear Error Under Existing Test ............... 23 Supreme Court Holds Argument in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin on Dischargeability ..................... 27 Reorganization ...................................................................................................................... 31 Dismissal ......................................................................................................................................... 32 The Validity of a ‘Golden Share’ to Bar a Filing Goes to the Fifth Circuit ................................ 33 Executory Contracts & Leases ...................................................................................................... 36 Circuit Split Deepens on Rejection of Trademark Licenses ........................................................ 37 Flip Clauses in Swaps Held Enforceable by District Judge in New York ................................... 40 Sales ................................................................................................................................................. 43 Third Circuit Explains When Sale Orders Are Not Automatically Moot .................................... 44 Ninth Circuit Joins Minority in Allowing Sales Free & Clear of Leases .................................... 46 Estate Property ............................................................................................................................... 48 California Supreme Court Kills the Jewel Doctrine on a Certified Question .............................. 49 Jurisdiction & Power ..................................................................................................................... 52 Seventh Circuit Requires Stern Consent from Unserved Defendants in Non-Core Suits............ 53 Automatic Stay Doesn’t Apply to Enforcement of Maritime Liens, Ninth Circuit Says ............ 56 Bankruptcy Court Finds Constitutional Power to Grant Releases in Confirmation Orders ........ 59 Makewhole Premiums ................................................................................................................... 63 Third Circuit Splits with New York by Allowing Makewhole Premiums in Chapter 11 ............ 64 Second Circuit Splits with Third on Makewholes Occasioned by Bankruptcy ........................... 67 Plans & Confirmation .................................................................................................................... 73 Ninth Circuit Holds that One Accepting Class in Joint Plan Is Sufficient .................................. 74 Non-Bankrupt Nonprofit Entities Are Not Subject to Substantive Consolidation ...................... 78 Non-Voting Creditors’ Consent to Third Party Releases Can’t Be Inferred ............................... 80 To Establish Record Dates, the Plan Applies, Not Securities Regulations .................................. 83 District Court Endorses Opt-Out to Confirm Substantive Consolidation Plans .......................... 85 Committees ..................................................................................................................................... 87 Delaware Judge Narrows Jevic to Prohibit Only End-of-Case Priority Skipping ....................... 88 First Circuit Widens a Circuit Split on a Committee’s Intervention Rights ................................ 90 Split Sixth Circuit Bars Litigation Trustees from Suing on D&O Policies ................................. 92 Existence of a Committee Precludes Tolling the Statute for Adverse Domination ..................... 95 Stays & Injunctions ........................................................................................................................ 97 Tenth Circuit Direct Appeal to Decide Whether the Automatic Stay Is Really Automatic ........ 98 Compensation ............................................................................................................................... 100 American Bankruptcy Institute • 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22314 1 www.abi.org Retention Agreements Allowing Defense Fees Ok in New Mexico, but Not in Delaware ....... 101 ASARCO Read to Bar Fee-Defense Costs Even with a Fee-Shifting Agreement ...................... 103 Fraudulent Transfers ................................................................................................................... 105 Ninth Circuit Splits with Seventh on Sovereign Immunity and Derivative Suits by a Trustee . 106 In a Circuit Split, Ninth Circuit Tags Innocent Sellers with Fraudulent Transfer Liability ...... 109 Circuits Split on Objective vs. Subjective Value for Fraudulent Transfer Consideration ......... 112 Third Circuit Narrowly Interprets Delaware Fraudulent Transfer Law ..................................... 114 Delaware District Judge Seemingly Splits with Second Circuit on the Safe Harbor................. 117 Fraudulent Transfer Claims Aren’t Capped by Creditors’ Losses ............................................. 120 Preferences & Claims .................................................................................................................. 123 Eighth Circuit Broadly Draws the Line to Identify ‘Unknown’ Claims that Are Discharged ... 124 Perishable Commodities Act ....................................................................................................... 126 En Banc, Ninth Circuit Holds: Only ‘True Sales’ of Receivables Comply with PACA ........... 127 Consumer Bankruptcy ....................................................................................................... 130 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ............................................................................................. 131 Eighth Circuit Broadly Interprets the FDCPA to Protect Consumers ....................................... 132 Courts Can’t Sanction Debt Collectors for Filing Stale Claims after Midland Funding ........... 135 Discharge/Dischargeability.......................................................................................................... 137 Violation of Discharge Is Now Difficult to Prove in the Ninth Circuit ..................................... 138 Co-Conspirator’s Intent Is Enough for Nondischargeability, Fifth Circuit Holds ..................... 141 No Contempt on Discharge Violation of Nondischargeable Debt, Circuit Says ....................... 143 Arbitration .................................................................................................................................... 145 Second Circuit Bars Arbitration in a Class Action for Violating the Discharge Injunction ...... 146 Wages & Dismissal ....................................................................................................................... 151 Ninth Circuit Creates Split on Appellate Standard for ‘Consumer Debt’ Determination.......... 152 On the Means Test, a Single Debtor Can Take Deductions for Two Cars ................................ 155 Section 1326(a)(2) Overrides a Levy Under State Law ............................................................. 157 Chicago Judge Erases Chapter 13 Debt Limits on Student Loans ............................................. 159 No Statutory Fees for Standing Chapter 13 Trustees if Dismissal Precedes Confirmation ....... 161 Plans & Confirmation .................................................................................................................. 163 Eleventh Circuit Requires No Objection to Overturn a Final Confirmation Order ................... 164 Seventh Circuit Allows Anticipated Tax Refunds to Be Offset by Expenses in Chapter 13..... 169 Colorado Judge Differs with Two Circuits on Chapter 13 Payments Beyond Five Years ........ 172 Ninth Circuit Demands Amended Schedules to Avoid Judicial Estoppel ................................. 174 En Banc, Eleventh Circuit Narrows Applicability of Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy ............ 176 Compensation ............................................................................................................................... 180 Fifth Circuit Holds that Chapter 7 Trustees Presumptively Get Statutory Commissions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CAREERS DONALD SHUM ’13 Is an Associate at Cooley in New York City; ALYSSA KUHN ’13 Is Clerking for Judge Joseph F
    CAREERS DONALD SHUM ’13 is an associate at Cooley in New York City; ALYSSA KUHN ’13 is clerking for Judge Joseph F. Bianco of the Eastern District of New York after working as an associate at Gibson Dunn in New York; and ZACH TORRES-FOWLER ’12 is an associate at Pepper Hamilton in Philadelphia. THE CAREER SERVICES PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW is one of the most successful among national law VIRGINIA ENJOYS A REPUTATION FOR PRODUCING LAWYERS who master the schools and provides students with a wide range of job intellectual challenges of legal practice, and also contribute broadly to the institutions they join through strong leadership and interpersonal skills. opportunities across the nation and abroad. AS A RESULT, PRIVATE- AND PUBLIC-SECTOR EMPLOYERS HEAVILY RECRUIT VIRGINIA STUDENTS EACH YEAR. Graduates start their careers across the country with large and small law firms, government agencies and public interest groups. ZACHARY REPRESENTATIVE RAY ’16 EMPLOYERS TAYLOR clerked for U.S. CLASSES OF 2015-17 STEFFAN ’15 District Judge clerked for Gershwin A. Judge Patrick Drain of the LOS ANGELES Higginbotham of Eastern District UNITED Hewlett Packard Enterprise Jones Day the 5th U.S. Circuit of Michigan STATES Dentons Jones Day Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Court of Appeals SARAH after law school, Howarth & Smith Reed Smith Morrison & Foerster in Austin, Texas, PELHAM ’16 followed by a ALABAMA Latham & Watkins Simpson Thacher & Bartlett Orrick, Herrington & before returning is an associate clerkship with BIRMINGHAM Mercer Consulting Sullivan & Cromwell Sutcliffe to Washington, with Simpson Judge Roger L. REDWOOD CITY D.C., to work for Thacher & Gregory of the Bradley Arant Boult Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Perkins Coie Covington Bartlett in New 4th U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Mont Pelerin Society Membership List
    MONT PELERIN SOCIETY DIRECTORY- 2013 1 ARGENTINA Dr. Martin Krause _____________________ San Isidro, Buenos Aires Argentina Dr. Alberto Benegas-Lynch Jr. San Isidro, BU Argentina 2000 Eduardo Marty 1978 Buenos Aires Argentina Gerardo Bongiovanni 2004 Rosario, Santa Fe Argentina Maria Gabriela Mrad 2007 Buenos Aires Argentina Mr. Walter Castro 2002 Rosario, Santa Fe Argentina Professor Martin Simonetta 2011 Buenos Aires Argentina Mr. Eduardo Helguera 2011 Argentina 1988 _______________________________________________________ H = Home Phone O = Office Phone F = Fax 19/20_ = Year of Membership * = Past President MONT PELERIN SOCIETY DIRECTORY- 2013 2 Professor Hector Siracusano AUSTRALIA _____________________ Buenos Aires Argentina Dr. Tanveer Ahmed Drummoyne, NSW Australia 1994 Life Member 2011 Eduardo Stordeur Argentina DR. Janet Albrechttsen 2012 Sydney, NSW Dr. Esteban Thomsen Australia Martinez, Buenos Aires Argentina 2011 1988 Professor James Allan Mr Guillermo Yeatts Sherwood, Brisbane, QLD Australia San Isidro, Buenos Aires Argentina 2010 1998 Mr. David Archibald Dr. Meir Zylberberg Perth, WA Buenos Aires Australia Argentina 2011 1969 Life Member _______________________________________________________ H = Home Phone O = Office Phone F = Fax 19/20_ = Year of Membership * = Past President MONT PELERIN SOCIETY DIRECTORY- 2013 3 Prof. Jeff Bennett Ms. Juel Briggs Gladesville, NSW Gundaroo, NSW Australia Australia 2008 2011 Mr. Chris Berg Mr. Robert Carling Mosman, NSW Melbourne, VIC Australia Australia 2011 2011 Mr. James Cox PSM Dr. Peter J. Boxall AO Sydney, NSW Coogee, NSW Australia Australia 2011 2011 Dr. Jonathan Crowe T. C. Beirne School of Law- The Professor Geoffrey Brennan University of Queensland Canberra W232A Forgan Smith Building, St. Lucia Capus Australia Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia 1987 2011 _______________________________________________________ H = Home Phone O = Office Phone F = Fax 19/20_ = Year of Membership * = Past President MONT PELERIN SOCIETY DIRECTORY- 2013 4 Michael Darling Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Philosophers by the Supreme Court Neomi Raot
    A Backdoor to Policy Making: The Use of Philosophers by the Supreme Court Neomi Raot The Supreme Court's decisions in Vacco v Quill' and Wash- ington v Glucksberg2 held that a state can ban assisted suicide without violating the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. In these high profile cases, six phi- losophers filed an amicus brief ("Philosophers'Brief') that argued for the recognition of a constitutional right to die.3 Although the brief was written by six of the most prominent American philoso- phers-Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, Thomas Scanlon, and Judith Jarvis Thomson-the Court made no mention of the brief in unanimously reaching the oppo- site conclusion.4 In light of the Court's recent failure to engage philosophical arguments, this Comment examines the conditions under which philosophy does and should affect judicial decision making. These questions are relevant in considering the proper role of the Court in controversial political questions and are central to a recent de- bate focusing on whether the law can still be considered an autonomous discipline that relies only on traditional legal sources. Scholars concerned with law and economics and critical legal studies have argued that the law is no longer autonomous, but rather that it does and should draw on many external sources in order to resolve legal disputes. Critics of this view have main- tained that legal reasoning is distinct from other disciplines, and that the law has and should maintain its own methods, conven- tions, and conclusions. This Comment follows the latter group of scholars, and ar- gues that the Court should, as it did in the right-to-die cases, stay clear of philosophy and base its decisions on history, precedent, and a recognition of the limits of judicial authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to The
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to the Senate December 16, 2011 The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of Foreign Service Officers. Submitted January 5 Arenda L. Wright Allen, of Virginia, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, vice Jerome B. Friedman, retired. Anthony J. Battaglia, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California, vice M. James Lorenz, retired. Cathy Bissoon, of Pennsylvania, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, vice Thomas M. Hardiman, elevated. James Emanuel Boasberg, of the District of Columbia, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia, vice Thomas F. Hogan, retired. Vincent L. Briccetti, of New York, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, vice Kimba M. Wood, retired. Louis B. Butler, Jr., of Wisconsin, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin, vice John C. Shabaz, retired. Susan L. Carney, of Connecticut, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, vice Barrington D. Parker, retired. Claire C. Cecchi, of New Jersey, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of New Jersey, vice Joseph A. Greenaway, elevated. Edward Milton Chen, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of California, vice Martin J. Jenkins, resigned. Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., of North Carolina, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, vice Lacy H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary and the Academy: a Fraught Relationship
    THE JUDICIARY AND THE ACADEMY: A FRAUGHT RELATIONSHIP RICHARD A. POSNER* I have been a federal court of appeals judge since 1981, and before that I had been a full-time law professor since 1968. And since becoming a judge I have continued to teach part time and do academic research and writing. The United States is unusual if not quite unique in the porousness of the membranes that separate the different branches of the legal profession. The judiciary both federal and state is a lateral-entry institution rather than a conventional civil service; and unlike the British system (though that system is loosening up and becoming more like the U.S. system), in which the judges are drawn from a narrow, homogeneous slice of the legal profession – namely, senior barristers – American judges are drawn from all the different branches of the profession, including the academic. Among appellate judges who came to the bench from academia are Oliver Wendell Holmes (although he had joined the Harvard Law School faculty only months before being appointed to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, he had been doing academic writing for many years), Harlan Fiske Stone, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, Antonin Scalia, Ruth Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer (U.S. Supreme Court); Calvert Magruder, Charles Clark, Jerome Frank, Joseph Sneed, Harry Edwards, Robert Bork, Ralph Winter, Frank Easterbrook, Stephen Williams, J. Harvie Wilkinson, John Noonan, Douglas Ginsburg, S. Jay Plager, Kenneth Ripple, Guido Calabresi, Michael McConnell, William Fletcher, and Diane Wood (U.S. courts of appeals); and Roger Traynor, Hans Linde, Benjamin Kaplan, Robert Braucher, Ellen Peters, and Charles Fried (state supreme courts).
    [Show full text]
  • Promising the Constitution
    RE (DO NOT DELETE) 2/14/2016 2:41 PM Copyright 2016 by Richard M. Re Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 110, No. 2 Articles PROMISING THE CONSTITUTION Richard M. Re ABSTRACT—The Constitution requires that all legislators, judges, and executive officers swear or affirm their fidelity to it. The resulting practice, often called “the oath,” has had a pervasive role in constitutional law, giving rise to an underappreciated tradition of promissory constitutionalism. For example, the Supreme Court has cited the oath as a reason to invalidate statutes, or sustain them; to respect state courts, or override them; and to follow precedents, or overrule them. Meanwhile, commentators contend that the oath demands particular interpretive methods, such as originalism, or particular distributions of interpretive authority, such as departmentalism. This Article provides a new framework for understanding the oath, its moral content, and its implications for legal practice. Because it engenders a promise, the oath gives rise to personal moral obligations. Further, the content of each oath, like the content of everyday promises, is linked to its meaning at the time it is made. The oath accordingly provides a normative basis for officials to adhere to interpretive methods and substantive principles that are contemporaneously associated with “the Constitution.” So understood, the oath provides a solution to the “dead hand” problem and explains how the people can legitimately bind their elected representatives: with each vote cast, the people today choose to be governed by oath-bound officials tomorrow. Constitutional duty thus flows from a rolling series of promises undertaken by individual officials at different times.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B—Nominations Submitted to the Senate
    Appendix B—Nominations Submitted to the Senate The following list does not include promotions Edward Milton Chen, of members of the Uniformed Services, nomi- of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the nations to the Service Academies, or nomina- Northern District of California, vice Martin J. tions of Foreign Service officers. Jenkins, resigned. Submitted January 5 Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., of North Carolina, to be U.S. District Judge for Arenda L. Wright Allen, of Virginia, to be U.S. District Judge for the the Western District of North Carolina, vice Eastern District of Virginia, vice Jerome B. Lacy H. Thornburg, retired. Friedman, retired. Mae A. D’Agostino, Anthony J. Battaglia, of New York, to be U.S. District Judge for the of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of New York, vice Frederick Southern District of California, vice M. James J. Scullin, Jr., retired. Lorenz, retired. Roy Bale Dalton, Jr., Cathy Bissoon, of Florida, to be U.S. District Judge for the of Pennsylvania, to be U.S. District Judge for Middle District of Florida, vice Henry Lee Ad- the Western District of Pennsylvania, vice ams, Jr., retired. Thomas M. Hardiman, elevated. Sara Lynn Darrow, James Emanuel Boasberg, of the District of Columbia, to be U.S. District of Illinois, to be U.S. District Judge for the Judge for the District of Columbia, vice Thom- Central District of Illinois, vice Joe B. Mc- as F. Hogan, retired. Dade, retired. Vincent L. Briccetti, Edward J. Davila, of New York, to be U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 32 Issue 4 Article 14 2005 Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals Michael E. Solimine [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael E. Solimine, Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. (2006) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol32/iss4/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW JUDICAL STRATIFICATION AND THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS Michael E. Solimine VOLUME 32 SUMMER 2005 NUMBER 4 Recommended citation: Michael E. Solimine, Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 1331 (2005). JUDICIAL STRATIFICATION AND THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. SOLIMINE* I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1331 II. MEASURING JUDICIAL REPUTATION, PRESTIGE, AND INFLUENCE: INDIVIDUAL JUDGES AND MULTIMEMBER COURTS ............................................................... 1333 III. MEASURING THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS . 1339 IV. THE RISE AND FALL OF
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Section 1 WE THOUGHT WE WERE JUST PLANTING ‘‘A WILDFLOWER AMONG THE WEEDS OF ACADEMIC LIBERALISM, AND IT TURNED OUT TO BE AN OAK.” — Antonin Scalia (1936–2016) Section 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 8 13 The President’s Student Lawyers Message Division Chapters 16 21 24 Faculty Practice State Division Groups Outreach 26 28 30 Alumni International National Lawyers OUR PURPOSE Relations Affairs Convention Federalist Society Senior Vice President Lee Liberman Otis, President Eugene B. Meyer, and Executive Vice President Leonard A. Leo. 38 40 43 Regulatory Article I Digital Transparency Project Initiative Law schools and the legal profession are currently emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to strongly dominated by a form of orthodox liberal say what the law is, not what it should be. The Society ideology which advocates a centralized and uniform seeks both to promote an awareness of these principles 46 48 society. While some members of the academic and to further their application through its activities. Publications Benefactors community have dissented from these views, by and & Blog large they are taught simultaneously with (and indeed This entails reordering priorities within the legal as if they were) the law. system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law. It also requires 53 59 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy restoring the recognition of the importance of these Independent Officers & Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians norms among lawyers, judges, law students, and Audit Staff interested in the current state of the legal order.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History of Distinguished American Judges: HON. DIANE P
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW – INSTITUTE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION (IJA) Oral History of Distinguished American Judges HON. DIANE P. WOOD U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT An Interview with Steven Art, Loevy & Loevy Katherine Minarik, cleverbridge September 27, 2018 All rights in this oral history interview belong to New York University. Quoting or excerpting of this oral history interview is permitted as long as the quotation or excerpt is limited to fair use as defined by law. For quotations or excerpts that exceed fair use, permission must be obtained from the Institute of Judicial Administration (IJA) at, Wilf Hall, 139 Macdougal Street, Room 420, New York 10012, or to [email protected], and should identify the specific passages to be quoted, intended use, and identification of the user. Any permission granted will comply with agreements made with the interviewees and/or interviewers who participated in this ora l history. All permitted uses must cite and give proper credit to: IJA Oral History of Distinguished American Judges, Institute of Judicial Administration, NYU School of Law, Judge Diane P. Wood: An Interview with Steven Art and Katherine Minarik, 2018. *The transcript shall control over the video for any permitted use in accordance with the above paragraph. Any differences in the transcript from the video reflect post-interview clarifications made by the participants and IJA. The footnotes were added by IJA solely for the reader’s information; no representation is made as to the accuracy or completeness of any of such footnote s. Transcribed by Ubiqus www.ubiqus.com NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW – INSTITUTE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION (IJA) Oral History of Distinguished American Judges [START RECORDING] MS.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundant Splits and Other Significant Bankruptcy Decisions
    Abundant Splits and Other Significant Bankruptcy Decisions 38th Annual Commercial Law & Bankruptcy Seminar McCall, Idaho Feb. 6, 2020; 2:30 P.M. Bill Rochelle • Editor-at-Large American Bankruptcy Institute [email protected] • 703. 894.5909 © 2020 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22014 • www.abi.org American Bankruptcy Institute • 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22314 1 www.abi.org Table of Contents Supreme Court ........................................................................................................................ 4 Decided Last Term ........................................................................................................................... 5 Nonjudicial Foreclosure Is Not Subject to the FDCPA, Supreme Court Rules ............................. 6 Licensee May Continue Using a Trademark after Rejection, Supreme Court Rules .................. 10 Court Rejects Strict Liability for Discharge Violations ............................................................... 15 Supreme Court Decision on Arbitration Has Ominous Implications for Bankruptcy ................. 20 Decided This Term ......................................................................................................................... 24 Supreme Court Rules that ‘Unreservedly’ Denying a Lift-Stay Motion Is Appealable .............. 25 Supreme Court Might Allow FDCPA Suits More than a Year After Occurrence ....................... 28 Cases Argued So Far This Term ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]