Social Science
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ALAVES - the Blessley History
Section 7 ALAVES - The Blessley History Editor’s Note - 1 When Ken Blessley agreed to complete the ALAVES story it was decided by the new Local Authority Valuers Association that it would be printed, together with the first instalment, and circulated to members. Both parts have been printed unamended, the only liberty I have taken with the text has been to combine the appendices. As reprinting necessitated retyping any subsequent errors and omissions are my responsibility. Barry Searle, 1987 Editor’s Note - 2 As part of the preparation of “A Century Surveyed”, Ken Blessley’s tour de force has been revisited. The document has been converted into computer text and is reproduced herewith, albeit in a much smaller and condensed typeface in order to reduce the number of pages. Colin Bradford, 2009 may well be inaccuracies. These can, of course, be corrected if they are of any significance. The final version will, it is hoped, be carefully conserved in the records of the Association so that possibly some ALAVES - 1949-1986 future member may be prepared to carry out a similar exercise in perhaps ten years’ time. The circulation of the story is limited, largely because of expense, but also because of the lesser interest of the majority of the current membership in what happened all those years Kenneth Blessley ago. I have therefore, confined the distribution list to the present officers and committee members, past presidents, and others who have held office for a significant period. The story of the Association of Local Authority Valuers 1. HOW IT ALL BEGAN & Estate Surveyors, 1949-1986. -
Urban Planning and the Motor Car, 1955-1977: Responses to the Growth of Private Motoring in Leicester and Milton Keynes
Urban Planning and the Motor Car, 1955-1977: Responses to the growth of private motoring in Leicester and Milton Keynes Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Richard Simon Harrison BA MA Centre for Urban History University of Leicester March 2015 Richard Simon Harrison Urban Planning and the Motor Car, 1955-1977: Responses to the growth of private motoring in Leicester and Milton Keynes Abstract This thesis examines the response of British urban planners to the rise of private motoring in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. The examination begins with an exploration of important planning documents and events of the 1950s and 1960s, relating to the issue of rising car ownership. It is followed by an exploration of the response of urban planners to rising car ownership in Leicester and Milton Keynes. This research covers an important stage in the rise of car culture in Britain and an important stage in the evolution of urban planning. From 1950 to 1960, the number of cars on Britain’s roads rose nearly two-and-a-half times to 5.5 million, which was seen as the beginning of mass car ownership. Although this prospect was often welcomed as a sign of affluence, it was also deemed to require a robust response from physical planners to prevent widespread traffic congestion and environmental nuisance. In this thesis I make four arguments. I argue, firstly, that it was in the 1950s and 1960s that a durable framework for approaching questions of urban transport in a motorised Britain was first worked out. -
PLANNING the URBAN FUTURE in 1960S BRITAIN*
The Historical Journal, 54, 2 (2011), pp. 477–507 f Cambridge University Press 2011 doi:10.1017/S0018246X11000100 PLANNING THE URBAN FUTURE IN 1960 sBRITAIN* GUY ORTOLANO New York University ABSTRACT. This article recovers Buckinghamshire county council’s proposal to build a monorail city for 250,000 residents during the 1960s. The project was eventually taken over by Whitehall, which proceeded to establish Britain’s largest new town of Milton Keynes instead, but from 1962 to 1968 local officials pursued their monorail metropolis. By telling the story of ‘North Bucks New City’, the article develops a series of claims. First, the proposal should be understood not as the eccentric creation of a single British county, but rather as one iteration of larger state efforts to manage the densities and distributions of growing populations. Second, while the 1960s witnessed the automobile’s decisive triumph as a means of personal mobility in Britain, that very triumph ironically generated critiques of the car and quests for alternatives. Third, the monorail was part of a complex social vision that anticipated – and, in part through the facilitation of recreational shopping, sought to alleviate – a crisis of delinquency expected to result from a world of automation and affluence. Fourth, despite its ‘futuristic’ monorail, the plan ultimately represented an effort by experts and the state to manage social change along congenial lines. Fifth, the proposal advanced a nationalist urbanism, promising renewed global stature for post-imperial Britain by building upon its long urban history. Finally, the article concludes by arguing that this unrealized vision points to the limitations of ‘modernism’ in the history of urban planning, and to the problems of teleology in the history of the 1960s. -
Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Project Methodology 2008
Buckinghamshire Historic Towns: Methodology Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Project Methodology 2008 Urban character and Urban Zones, Aylesbury Buckinghamshire Historic Towns: Methodology I DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................................4 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Project Background and Purpose ...................................................................................... 4 2 Documentary Evidence .............................................................................................................7 2.1 Preliminary Historical Background Research (see Bibliography) ...................................... 7 2.2 Historical Consultancy (See Appendix 3) .......................................................................... 8 3 Archaeological Evidence...........................................................................................................8 3.1 Archaeological Investigations ............................................................................................ 8 3.2 Environmental Evidence .................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Statutory & Non Statutory Protection............................................................................... 11 3.4 Historical topography ...................................................................................................... -
Milton Keynes New Town Heritage Register Statement of Significance Prepared for Milton Keynes Council November 2017
Milton Keynes New Town Heritage Register Statement of Significance Prepared for Milton Keynes Council November 2017 Alan Baxter Milton Keynes New Town Heritage Register Statement of Significance Prepared for Milton Keynes Council November 2017 Contents Executive Summary ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 4�0 Significance ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������44 1�0 Introduction ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 4�1 Assessing Significance �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������44 1�1 Purpose and structure of report �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 4�2 Context: the most successful British New Town ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������44 1�2 Methodology and assessment area ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 4�3 Statutory designations ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������45