Sustainability Appraisal - Submission Draft Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council
July 2013
jam consult ltd
This report has been prepared on behalf of Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council by: jam consult ltd 3 Jerningham Road London SE14 5NQ t: 020 7732 4249 m: 07812 129 810 e: [email protected] w: www.jamconsult.com
Contents
Non-Technical Summary 7 AAP Issues and Options 1 Introduction 7.1 Assessment of Plan Objectives against SA Framework 1.1 Introduction 7.2 Development of the AAP Options 1.2 Why is a Sustainability Appraisal needed? 7.3 Development of the AAP Policies 1.3 What is this document? 2 The Area Action Plan 8 Sustainability Effects of the AAP 2.1 What is the purpose of the AAP? 8.1 How has sustainability been considered in the development of the 2.2 What are the Objectives of the AAP? plan? 8.2 Significant sustainability effects of the Options 3 Sustainability Appraisal Methodology 8.3 Significant sustainability effects of the Policies 3.1 Purpose of the Sustainability Appraisal 8.4 Proposed mitigation measures 3.2 Planning Policy and Sustainable Development 8.5 Any uncertainties and risks 3.3 The Sustainability Appraisal Process 3.4 Stages of the SA Process 9.0 Implementation 3.5 Method of Assessment 9.1 What are the next steps? 3.6 Consultation 9.2 How the plan will be implemented 3.7 Difficulties encountered in carrying out the SA 9.3 Proposals for monitoring 4 Baseline and Context 4.1 Links to other policies and programmes 10 Conclusions 4.2 Summary of Baseline Information 10.1 Conclusions and Recommendations
5 Sustainability Issues and Objectives 5.1 Sustainability Issues Appendices 5.2 Sustainability Objectives A1 SA and SEA requirements 6 Sustainability Appraisal Framework A2 Summary of Policies, Plans and Programmes 6.1 The SA Framework A3 Summary of Baseline Information A4 Compatibility Matrix of Sustainability Objectives
A5 Assessment of AAP Objectives A6 Assessment of AAP Options A7 Assessment of AAP Policies A8 Cumulative Impact Assessment A9 Summary of Policy Changes from Consultation to Draft Submission A10 Summary of AAP Matters and Issues
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 1 May 2013 Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan
Non-Technical Summary
N.1 Introduction N.2 Why is a Sustainability Appraisal needed?
This document provides a Sustainability Appraisal (SA) of the Under section 19(5) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act Submission Draft Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan (AAP). 2004, Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is mandatory for new or revised The AAP will support the Core Strategy (Local Plan) and provides the Development Plan Documents (DPDs). The appraisal should include detailed planning guidance for development in the areas of Earl an assessment of the likely significant impacts - economic, social and Shilton and Barwell for the period up to 2026. environmental - of the plan.
Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council (HBBC) adopted its Core When conducting an SA of DPDs an environmental assessment must Strategy in 2009, which identified Earl Shilton and Barwell as also be conducted in accordance with the requirements of European Sustainable Urban Extensions. An initial Scoping Report was Directive 2001/42/EC (The Strategic Environmental Assessment published in 2005 for consultation, which set out the proposed Directive), transposed into the UK legislation by the Environmental methodology for the SA. A draft AAP was produced in 2010 and an Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004, Section 12. Interim Sustainability Appraisal (Capita Symonds, January 2011). Following the publication of the draft reports it was decided to update Sustainability Appraisals should be carried out in accordance with the Scoping Report in 2012 to reflect the changes in the planning Government Guidance ‘A Practical Guide to the SEA Directive, system and regulations and to set out the SA methodology for both ODPM, 2005’ and the ‘National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) the AAP and the Development Management and Site Allocations 2012’ . Sustainability Appraisal, as defined under the Planning and Development Management Documents. Compulsory Purchase Act, fully incorporates the requirements of the SEA directive. The term SA is therefore used to refer to the combined assessment.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 2 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
N.3 What is this document? N.4 Options considered in the Area Action Plan
This document provides the Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal of the AAP or Stage B and C of the SA process and assesses the Earl Shilton & Barwell Sustainable Urban Extensions Options, Policies and Proposals considered in the development of the Land is allocated to the south east of Earl Shilton and to the west of AAP. Barwell for Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs). Earl Shilton and Barwell contain pockets of significant deprivation, particularly relating The Scoping Report ( Stage A ) sets out the context and scope of the to income, education skills and training, employment and health and SA in accordance with the regulations and best practice guidance. their local centres are in need of regeneration. The areas suffer from Owing to the amount of change that has occurred to the planning multiple deprivation and are designated Local Strategic Partnership system and legislation since the previous reports were published, a ‘priority neighbourhoods’ with targeted actions for improvement. revised Scoping Report was produced in June 2012 and issued for To support this regeneration and to reinvigorate these important consultation. The full report can be accessed on the Council’s website urban areas, two mixed use Sustainable Urban Extensions are at http://www.hinckley-bosworth.gov.uk proposed, one of 2500 homes to the west of Barwell and one of 1600 homes to the south of Earl Shilton. In addition, to ensure the The Scoping Report was forwarded to the statutory consultees to Sustainable Urban Extensions are sustainable, the need to allocate a ensure that the proposed scope of work was appropriate, including: further 20-25 ha of employment land to support the population in • The Environment Agency these new communities was identified in the Leicester and • Natural England Leicestershire HMA Employment Land Study, 2008. The employment • English Heritage land figure has subsequently been revised down to approximately 11ha, as set out in the King Sturge Employment Study, 2010. The neighbouring local authorities and other key stakeholders were Initial Options also consulted. Responses to the consultation were received from Capita Lovejoy was commissioned to prepare Masterplan Options for nine of the consultees, including the statutory consultees. Comments related to: the Earl Shilton and Barwell Action Plan. The Masterplan Options report (November 2009) documents the preparation of a series of • additional guidance that should be included ‘Spatial Options’ for the regeneration of Earl Shilton and Barwell. Six • updates to the baseline data • options were appraised (two options for each of the proposed SUEs minor amendments to the sustainability objectives and indicators. and one option for generating each settlement centre). These options were used for the preparation of the final masterplan (the ‘preferred’ The full responses are provided in Appendix D of the Scoping report. option), which was the subject of consultation by stakeholders and the general public in November and December 2009 and March 2010. The options were generated by the project team, which involved close collaboration between the consultants and council officers, following
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 3 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
an inception day workshop (July 2009) and the preparation of an examine the acceptability in principle of the specific access extensive evidence base. arrangements proposed that underpin the SUE Masterplan Options.
Draft Submission Version The Masterplan options were amended to reflect a number of the The Draft Submission Version AAP has been amended to take into early conclusions of the above consultations. In respect of the Earl consideration the consultation responses to the Preferred Options Shilton SUE, the options were revised to present two options that and additional evidence for the masterplans, in particular, the were more distinct in highlighting potential approaches to the key site Strategic Transport Assessment, the infrastructure requirements and issues, notably the Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW). the Viability Assessment. A further Sustainability Appraisal (this
document) has therefore been undertaken to ensure that the new Preferred Options evidence is fully considered in the assessment. The preferred options were presented to the community via a manned The SA has assessed the same five options that were identified at the exhibition in October 2010 and set out in the Consultation Draft of the Preferred Options stage to ensure that the new evidence has not Earl Shilton and Barwell AAP, November 2010. An interim changed the sustainability outcomes, in addition to the final preferred Sustainability Appraisal of the AAP, Capita Symonds, January 2011 option for Earl Shilton, which is a combination of Options 1 and 2. tested five options as follows: The detailed results of the options appraisal are set out in Section 8 of this report and Appendix A6 . PO1 Earl Shilton SUE(retains WWTW) PO2 Earl Shilton SUE (replaces WWTW) PO3 Barwell SUE PO4 Earl Shilton existing PO5 Barwell existing The land chosen for the SUEs is immediately adjacent to the existing built up area of each settlement in order to: • Ensure the greatest benefit to the settlement centres of Earl Shilton and Barwell • Facilitate ease of access between the new homes and Hinckley itself, with its services and employment opportunities • Maximise the opportunity for joint public transport servicing of the existing and new housing areas, and to make viable routes within new developments. Some outstanding technical matters were identified, to be resolved through the masterplanning process. In particular, it was identified that further discussions with Leicestershire County Council Highways be undertaken, before wider public consultation was carried out, to
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 4 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
N.5 Significant sustainability effects of the AAP
Options The majority of impacts for Earl Shilton Options 1 and 2 are positive, The results show that the SUEs both perform well compared to the although are unlikely to be realised in the short term until the existing settlements as they provide the opportunity for regeneration development is complete. Some negative impacts may occur in the and enhancement of the current provision and facilities. short term during construction. Specific mitigation measures will be Earl Shilton: Option 1 need to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Design and Access Statement that should accompany any planning The Earl Shilton SUE Option 1 retains the Waste Water Treatment application. In general, uncertain results relate to impacts where Works (WWTW) on the site, which means approximately 40 ha of further work will be required at the detailed stage. land can be developed for approximately 1,400 homes. The SUE is to provide an exemplar of sustainable design and provide a catalyst The impact on noise is not identified in the SA Framework but is for the regeneration of the existing settlement. The retention of the acknowledged in the Implementation Plan of the AAP and should be WWTW on site restricts the amount of developable land available. considered as part of any planning application in relation to transport The WWTW also provides restrictions in the type of neighbouring and construction impacts. development that can occur and may provide issues in relation to No significant negative effects have been identified in the medium to odour. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey long term. There is likely to be some adverse effect to the landscape work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water during construction but the medium to long term effects are likely to drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the improve and enhance the existing provision. planning applications for the site. Earl Shilton: Option 3 Earl Shilton: Option 2 The retention of Earl Shilton will mean that there will be little change The Earl Shilton SUE Option 2 removes the Waste Water Treatment in many of the current impacts upon sustainability. However, the lack Works (WWTW) on the site, which means approximately 46 ha of of development in Earl Shilton will mean that the provision of any new land can be developed providing c.1,600. The SUE is to provide an services, facilities, homes or jobs and the associated improvement exemplar of sustainable design and provide a catalyst for the and enhancement works will not take place. The regeneration of the regeneration of the existing settlement. The removal of the WWTW area will be difficult to achieve and the quality of life for residents is on site increases the amount of developable land available and the unlikely to improve. restrictions to the type of neighbouring development that can occur. This option provides approximately 7Ha. less Natural and Semi- Natural Green Space than Option 1 but an increase in Open Space provision. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the planning applications for the site.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 5 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Earl Shilton: Option 4 – Preferred Option The Earl Shilton SUE Option 4 (the Preferred Option) combines elements of Option 1 and Option 2. The Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW) is retained on the site, which means approximately 40 ha of land can be developed, however it is proposed that 1600 dwellings are to be delivered. A higher density of development will therefore be required, which will be determined at the planning application stage. The SUE is to provide an exemplar of sustainable design and provide a catalyst for the regeneration of the existing settlement. The retention of the WWTW on site restricts the amount of developable land available. The WWTW also provides restrictions in the type of neighbouring development that can occur and may provide issues in relation to odour, a 100m buffer is proposed around the WWTW to address these issues. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the planning applications for the site. The County Council’s Resources Map indicates the potential presence of pockets of glacial sand and gravel deposits within both sites. Further detailed assessments will be required at the planning application stage. The majority of impacts are positive, although are unlikely to be realised in the short term until the development is complete. Some negative impacts may occur in the short term during construction. Specific mitigation measures will be need to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Design and Access Statement that should accompany any planning application. In general, uncertain results relate to impacts where further work will be required at the detailed stage. The impact on noise is not specifically identified in the SA Framework but is acknowledged in the Implementation Plan of the AAP and should be considered as part of any planning application in relation to transport and construction impacts. No significant negative effects have been identified in the medium to long term. There is likely to be some adverse effect to the landscape during construction but the medium to long term effects are likely to improve and enhance the existing provision.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 6 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
long term effects are likely to improve and enhance the existing provision.
Barwell: Option 1 Barwell: Option 2 The Barwell SUE Option proposes the development of c.2500 homes The retention of Barwell will mean that there will be little change in at a density of around 32d/p/h. The SUE is to provide an exemplar of many of the current impacts upon sustainability. However, the lack of sustainable design and provide a catalyst for the regeneration of the development in Barwell will mean that the provision of any new existing settlement. The Council will expect compliance with Core services, facilities, homes or jobs and the associated improvement Strategy Policy 16 on Housing Density, Mix and Design and Policy 15 and enhancement works will not take place. The regeneration of the on Affordable Housing, which requires 20% on-site provision of area will be difficult to achieve and the quality of life for residents is affordable housing. unlikely to improve. This option proposes approximately 9.6 Ha. of outdoor sports provision and Accessible Natural and Semi-Natural Green Space will be provided throughout the SUE. The SUE contains the Little Fields Meadow local wildlife site, which will be retained. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the planning applications for the site. The large public open space immediately adjacent to the Barwell urban extension is a restored landfill. An assessment will be needed to establish if there are any contaminants that may have implications for neighbouring uses. The County Council’s Resources Map indicates the potential presence of pockets of glacial sand and gravel deposits within both sites. Further detailed assessments will be required at the planning application stage. The majority of impacts are positive, although are unlikely to be realised in the short term until the development is complete. Some negative impacts may occur in the short term during construction. Specific mitigation measures will be need to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Design and Access Statement that should accompany any planning application.
The impact on noise is not identified in the SA Framework but is acknowledged in the Implementation Plan of the AAP and should be considered as part of any planning application in relation to transport and construction impacts. No significant negative effects have been identified in the medium to long term. There is likely to be some adverse effect to the landscape during construction but the medium to
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 7 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
N.6 Significant sustainability effects of the AAP Policies
The SA has also assessed the proposed policies for the AAP against SO15 To minimise energy use and develop renewable energy resources the SA framework. The number of policies has been reduced from 34 in the preferred options to 26 in the submission version, to remove SO16 To reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the rate of climate change. duplication of issues that will be addressed in the forthcoming Site Allocations and Development Management policies. The full results Short term negative impacts are also considered likely with regards to of the policy appraisal are set out in Section 8 of this report and energy efficiency and carbon emissions, however, compliance with Appendix A7 . A summary of the results is provided below. Details of Core Strategy Policy 24: Sustainable Design and Technology should the policy changes made since the last Consultation Draft AAP can ensure a positive impact in the medium to long term. be found in Appendix A9. Uncertain Impacts Positive Impacts Uncertain impacts are identified for the following objectives: The majority of the impacts of the policies are positive. SO3 To provide better opportunities for local people and tourists to Negative Impacts access and understand local heritage Minor negative impacts are identified in the short term for: SO6 To promote and support the empowerment of local communities in creating and implementing solutions that meet SO7 To protect and enhance the natural environment (species and their needs focusing particularly on young, elderly and habitats) whilst contributing to the achievement of Biodiversity deprived people Action Plan targets. SO7 To protect and enhance the natural environment (species and The SUEs develop green field land in areas of mature landscape and habitats) whilst contributing to the achievement of Biodiversity development is therefore likely to have a negative impact in the short Action Plan targets. term. Mitigation measures in terms of new open space, biodiversity SO12 To manage prudently water resources, improve water quality protection and enhancement should result in a positive impact in the and protect the floodplain. medium to long term. SO13 To improve air quality particularly through reducing transport SO13 To improve air quality particularly through reducing transport related pollutants related pollutants SO14 To manage prudently mineral resources and avoid / reduce The development is likely to have a minor negative impact on air pollution of land. quality in the short term during construction. Detailed traffic modelling SO20 To optimise the use of previously developed land, buildings of the proposed development will be needed and the identification of and existing infrastructure suitable mitigation measures to ensure there is no adverse affect. The uncertainty should be removed as a result of further work and information that will be required with the detailed planning applications and Environmental Impact Assessment and the identification of appropriate mitigation. Details of the proposed mitigation are set out in Section 8.4 and the Appendices .
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 8 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
N.7 Uncertainties and Risks Cumulative Impacts The majority of the cumulative impacts are positive, although most will The Plans, Programmes and Policies as well as the Baseline Data will not be realised until the medium to long term once the development is need to be reviewed on a regular basis to identify any new data that complete. may come forward that could have implications for the proposed Minor negative impacts are identified in the short term for SO7, SO13, development. SO15 and SO16. The SUEs develop green field land in areas of mature landscape and development is therefore likely to have a Uncertain impacts have been identified in relation to several of the cumulative minor negative impact in the short term. Mitigation Sustainability Objectives. The uncertainty should be removed as a measures in terms of new open space, biodiversity protection and result of further work that will be undertaken as part of the planning enhancement should result in a positive impact in the medium to long application. Specific attention should be given to the uncertain term. impacts identified.
The development is likely to have a minor negative impact on air Details of the proposed mitigation measures will also need to be quality in the short term during construction. Detailed traffic modelling provided in more detail at the planning application stage to ensure of the proposed development, as a whole, will be needed and the that any adverse impacts are suitably addressed. Monitoring of the identification of suitable mitigation measures. impacts will be addressed through the Annual Monitoring Report. The cumulative impact upon secondary education provision will also need to be considered as a joint requirement for both settlements, There are also risks largely outside the Borough’s control, which although it is anticipated that the anticipated need can be could have an impact on the development proposals such as the accommodated. economic climate, changes to the planning and building regulations Short term negative impacts are also considered likely with regards to and the impact of climate change. Consideration of these issues energy efficiency and carbon emissions, however, compliance with should be included within the monitoring and implementation plan. Core Strategy Policy 24: Sustainable Design and Technology should ensure a positive impact in the medium to long term. N.8 Next Steps Uncertain impacts are identified for SO3, SO6, SO12, SO13, SO14, and SO20. The uncertainty should be removed as a result of further Following consultation on the Draft Submission AAP and SA Report, work and information that will be required with the detailed planning any amendments that are considered necessary will be made to the applications, the Environmental Impact Assessment and the AAP in response to representations received. If significant identification of appropriate mitigation. amendments are made it may be necessary to subject those changes to a further SA. The AAP will then be submitted to the Secretary of
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 9 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
State for review by a Planning Inspector.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 10 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
The Area Action Plan will support the Core Strategy (Local Plan) and When conducting an SA of DPDs an environmental assessment must Development Management and Site Allocations Development Plan also be conducted in accordance with the requirements of European Documents and provide the detailed planning guidance for Directive 2001/42/EC (The Strategic Environmental Assessment development in Earl Shilton and Barwell for the period up to 2026. Directive), transposed into the UK legislation by the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004, Section 12. The Core Strategy has been prepared in accordance with the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and was formally Sustainability Appraisals should be carried out in accordance with adopted by HBBC in 2009. Government Guidance, in particular ‘A Practical Guide to the SEA Directive, ODPM, 2005’ and the ‘National Planning Policy Framework An initial Scoping Report was published in 2009 for consultation, (NPPF) 2012’ . Sustainability Appraisal, as defined under the which set out the proposed methodology for the SA. A draft AAP was Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act, fully incorporates the produced in 2010 and an interim Sustainability Appraisal (Capita requirements of the SEA directive. The term SA is therefore used to Symonds, January 2011). Following the publication of the draft refer to the combined assessment. reports it was decided to update the Scoping Report in 2012 to reflect the changes in the planning system and regulations and to set out the 1.3 What is this document? SA methodology for both the AAP and the Development Management and Site Allocations Development Management Documents. This document provides the Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal of the AAP or Stage B and C of the SA process and assesses the 1.2 Why is a Sustainability Appraisal needed? Options, Policies and Masterplans considered in the development of the AAP. Under section 19(5) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is mandatory for new or revised The Scoping Report ( Stage A ) sets out the context and scope of the Development Plan Documents (DPDs). The appraisal should include SA in accordance with the regulations and best practice guidance. an assessment of the likely significant impacts - economic, social and Owing to the amount of change that has occurred to the planning environmental - of the plan. system and legislation since the previous reports were published, a revised Scoping Report was produced in June 2012 and issued for consultation. The full report can be accessed on the Council’s website at http://www.hinckley-bosworth.gov.uk
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 11 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
2 The Area Action Plan
2.1 What is the purpose of the AAP? 2.2 What are the Objectives of the AAP? The Earl Shilton and Barwell AAP will provide more detail and The Objectives of the AAP are as follows: guidance on how the policies in the Core Strategy (Local Plan) will be 1. To provide thriving communities in Earl Shilton and Barwell that implemented. An initial draft of the Document was issued for public have their own sense of identity and character, recognising their consultation in 2010. This draft is now being updated to reflect the unique identity recent changes in policy and regulations and additional evidence that 2. To integrate the Urban Extensions with the exiting communities has become available. The Draft Submission AAP is subject to and provide an inclusive, attractive and vibrant environment with consultation alongside this document. a high quality of life for all residents The AAP provides guidance for the development of two Sustainable 3. To deliver high quality new homes which are supported by further Urban Extensions, one at Earl Shilton and one at Barwell up to the high quality community, health and educational facilities through period 2026. the upgrading of existing facilities or the provision, where appropriate, of new facilities Earl Shilton and Barwell 4. To retain and enhance employment opportunities in Earl Shilton Land is allocated to the south east of Earl Shilton and to the west of and Barwell through protection of existing employment sources Barwell for Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs). Earl Shilton and and through the provision of new and diverse opportunities in the Barwell contain pockets of significant deprivation, particularly relating development of the Sustainable Urban Extensions to income, education skills and training, employment and health and 5. To increase and improve the range of retail provision in Earl their local centres are in need of regeneration. The areas suffer from Shilton and Barwell and to ensure the centres continue to support multiple deprivation and are designated Local Strategic Partnership the role of Hinckley as the sub regional centre ‘priority neighbourhoods’ with targeted actions for improvement. 6. To increase and improve the levels of accessibility and transport choice, principally focusing on sustainable methods of transport, To support this regeneration and to reinvigorate these important in and around Earl Shilton and Barwell, the proposed Urban urban areas, two mixed use Sustainable Urban Extensions are Extensions, Hinckley Town Centre and the surrounding proposed, one of 2500 homes to the west of Barwell and one of 1600 countryside homes to the south of Earl Shilton. In addition, to ensure the 7. To contribute to the enhancement of the public realm and Sustainable Urban Extensions are sustainable, the need to allocate a appearance of the centres of Earl Shilton and Barwell, providing further 20-25 ha of employment land to support the population in more attractive places for users and investors these new communities was identified in the Leicester and 8. To provide green infrastructure which forms the heart of new Leicestershire HMA Employment Land Study, 2008. The employment communities with well designed green spaces and links to the land figure has subsequently been revised down to approximately surrounding countryside and supports sustainable, healthy and 11ha, as set out in the King Sturge Employment Study, 2010. active lifestyles for residents
9. To enable the achievement of sustainable lifestyles which involve a reduction in energy use in the areas of home occupation and travel.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 12 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
3 Sustainability Appraisal Methodology
3.1 Purpose of the Sustainability Appraisal 3.2 Planning Policy and Sustainable Development The purpose of Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is to ensure that The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published in sustainable development has been integrated in the formulation of March 2012. The NPPF must be taken into account in the development plans and to verify that due consideration has been preparation of local plans and is a material consideration in planning given to social, economic and environmental factors. The SA must decisions. Planning policies and decisions must also reflect and, also show how the requirements of the Strategic Environmental where appropriate, promote relevant EU obligations and statutory Assessment (SEA) Directive have been met . Appendix 1 provides requirements. details of how the SEA requirements have been met within the document. The purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development as defined in the Bruntland definition. The definition of sustainable development is also set out in the UK Sustainable development Strategy ‘Securing the future - delivering the UK Sustainable Development Strategy, 2005’. The document sets out the guiding principles for sustainable development and priorities for action. The strategy sets out five guiding principles to ‘meeting the needs of the achieve sustainable development: Living within environmental limits present without compromising Ensuring a strong, healthy and just society Achieving a sustainable economy the ability of future generations Promoting good governance Using sound science responsibly to meet their own needs ’ The Strategy also gives the following priorities for action: Definition of Sustainable Development, Brundtland Sustainable consumption and production Climate Change and Energy
Natural Resource Protection and Environmental Enhancement Sustainable Communities.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 13 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
3.3 The Sustainability Appraisal Process The Sustainability Appraisal of the AAP has been carried out by jam consult ltd in consultation with Council officers, in accordance with the relevant Regulations and Government policy and guidance, as set out below: • European Directive 2001/42/EC (The Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive) • EC Guidance on the SEA Directive – Implementation of Directive 2001/42 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, September 2003
• Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004, Section 12 • The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Section 19(5) • A Practical Guide to the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive, ODPM 2005 • Local Development Frameworks: Examining Development Plan Documents – Soundness Guidance, Planning Inspectorate, August 2009 and update February 2010 • Local Development Frameworks: Examining Development Plan Documents – Learning form Experience, September 2009 • The National Planning Policy Framework, 2012 • The Plan-Making Manual, Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG)
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 14 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
3.4 Stages of the SA Process
The stages of the SA process are as follows. This report provides Stages B and C.
A1: Identify other relevant plans, programmes and sustainability objectives A2: Collect baseline information A3: Identify sustainability issues and problems A4: Develop SA framework, including objectives, indicators and targets A5: Consult on the Scope of the SA STAGE B: INTERIM SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Develop and refine alternatives and assess effects B1: Test the plan or programme objectives against the SA framework B2: Develop the DPD options/alternatives B3: Predict the effects of the draft DPD, including options/alternatives B4: Evaluate the effects of the draft DPD, including options/alternatives B5: Consider ways of mitigating adverse effects and maximising beneficial effects B6: Propose measures to monitor the sustainability effects of the plan or programme implementation STAGE C: PREPARE THE FINAL SUSTAINABILITY REPORT C1: Prepare the Sustainability Report STAGE D: CONSULT ON THE DRAFT PLAN AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT D1: Consult on the draft DPD and Sustainability Report D2: Assess any significant changes as a result of the consultation D3: Finalise Sustainability Report and prepare Sustainability Statement STAGE E: MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN OR PROGRAMME E1: Develop aims and methods for monitoring E2: Respond to any adverse effects It should be noted that SA is an iterative process and some stages may need to be undertaken more Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 15 May 2013 Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan
than once.
3.5 Method of Assessment
The AAP has been assessed against the SA framework to establish the likely significant effects, both positive and negative, of the policies. The SA framework sets outs the Sustainability Objectives, Indicators The SEA Directive also requires an assessment of secondary, and Targets, which are used to assess the likely impacts of the plan. cumulative and synergistic effects. Collectively these effects are The SA framework has been developed in consultation with the called cumulative impacts. Cumulative impacts may arise, for statutory consultees and other key local stakeholders. example, where several developments each have insignificant effects
but together have a significant effect or where several individual The SA predicts the likely significant effects of the AAP, including effects have a combined effect. alternatives and then evaluates the effects of the plan. The
assessment is carried out in the form of a matrix and includes the Synergistic effects interact to produce a total effect greater than the identification of potential mitigation measures. sum of the individual effects. Significant synergistic effects often
occur as habitats, resources or human communities get close to The results have been scored as follows: capacity. For example, a wildlife habitat can become progressively fragmented with limited effects on a particular species until the last Major negative impact fragmentation makes the area too small to support the species at all.
Minor negative impact The assessment of alternative options includes a clear audit trail of Uncertain impact the details for selection and rejection in order to document a
Minor positive impact transparent approach.
Major positive impact
No significant impact
A commentary accompanies the matrix to explain the reasons for the scoring. The results are assessed in terms of short, medium and long-term effects (5, 10 and 15 years) including permanent and temporary effects.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 16 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
3.6 Consultation
A wide range of consultation measures has informed the development of the AAP, from the initial inception of the strategic proposals through The full list of bodies consulted included: to the development of masterplan options. These are described within • Natural England the AAP document itself. • The Environment Agency • English Heritage Consultation has been undertaken on the following documents: • Leicestershire County Council Policy Team/Better Places Team – Scoping Report for the Local Plan Process, June 2005 • Leicestershire County Council Access Team – Sustainability Appraisal of the Masterplan Options June 2010 • Leicestershire County Council Countryside Services – Consultation Draft of the AAP, November 2010 • Blaby District Council – Interim Sustainability Appraisal, Capita Symonds, January 2011 • Leicester and Rutland Wildlife Trust – Updated Scoping Report June 2012 • Stepping Stones • Leicestershire Local Access Forum Formal consultation has been undertaken by HBBC in line with • House Builders Federation regulatory and best practice guidance in relation to the plan making • Leicestershire County And Rutland Primary Care Trust and associated Sustainability Appraisal process. Full details of the • Leicestershire Constabulary consultation measures undertaken, and responses received, are set • Leicestershire Chamber of Commerce out within the Site Allocations and Development Management Policies • British Waterways Development Plan Document and Earl Shilton and Barwell Area • Leicester & Leicestershire Enterprise Partnership Action Plan Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report and Appendices • Sport England (June 2012). A summary of the key findings of the consultation on • Forestry Commission the preferred options (Consultation Draft, 2010) are set out in Section • Highways Agency 7.2 Development of the Options and Appendix A10. • Severn Trent • Following the publication of the draft reports it was decided to update RSPB • the Scoping Report in 2012 to reflect the changes in the planning Fields in Trust • system and regulations and to set out the SA methodology for both Network Rail the AAP and the Development Management and Site Allocations • Rural Community Council (Leicestershire And Rutland) Development Management Documents. The Scoping stage of this • Leicestershire Rural Partnership Sustainability Appraisal process included a six-week period of • Campaign For The Protection of Rural England consultation, undertaken between 16 th January 2012 and 28 th • Oadby and Wigston Borough Council February 2012. The consultation included the statutory consultees: • North West Leicestershire District Council Natural England; The Environment Agency and English Heritage as • Charnwood Borough Council well as key stakeholders and neighbouring authorities as • Melton Borough Council recommended in Government guidance. • Harborough District Council • Leicestershire Highways Authority • Leicester City Council Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 17 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
3.7 Difficulties encountered in carrying out the SA A total of nine responses were received, from the following The Plans, Programmes and Policies as well as the Baseline Data will consultees: need to be reviewed on a regular basis to identify any new data that • English Heritage may come forward that could have implications for the proposed • Natural England development. • Environment Agency • Leicestershire County Council Environmental Action Team Uncertain impacts have been identified in relation to several of the • Leicestershire County Council Transport Team Sustainability Objectives. The uncertainty should be removed as a • Sport England result of further work that will be undertaken as part of the planning application. Specific attention should be given to the uncertain • Leicestershire Constabulary impacts identified. • Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Primary Care Trust • Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust Details of the proposed mitigation measures will also need to be Comments received related mainly to recommendations regarding provided in more detail at the planning application stage to ensure policy and best practice guidance that should be followed, useful that any adverse impacts are suitably addressed. Monitoring of the sources of up-to-date baseline information and refinement of impacts will be addressed through the Annual Monitoring Report. Sustainability Objectives in light of advice from the specialist bodies. Details of the consultation feedback are contained within Appendix D There are also risks largely outside the Borough’s control, which of the Scoping Report and have been taken into account within the could have an impact on the development proposals such as the preparation of this Sustainability Appraisal. economic climate, changes to the planning and building regulations and the impact of climate change. Consideration of these issues One of the major changes to the Scoping Report that arose as a should be included within the monitoring and implementation plan. consequence of the consultation exercise was the removal of Sustainability Objective 17, which related to ‘Sustainable Lifestyles’. Natural England raised the questionability of the purpose of the objective, given its generic nature and consequent difficulty of recording. The other comments made by the nine consultees related to minor issues, which have been considered in undertaking this SA and incorporated where possible. For example, English Heritage identified the need to distinguish between heritage features ‘at risk’ and actual impacts upon those features. The baseline information has therefore been updated to quantify ‘at risk’ features and to identify a possible future indicator in relation to heritage features.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 18 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
4 Baseline and Context
4.1 Links to other policies and programmes Appendix E of the Scoping Report has identified the relevant plans, The manufacturing industry provides the highest proportion of programmes and sustainability objectives relating to the Sustainability employment for the residents of Earl Shilton and Barwell. Earl Shilton Appraisal of the Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan. The accommodates employment uses within its centre, including the Oaks purpose of reviewing those documents is to identify the policy Industrial Estate. Barwell centre already accommodates a number of objectives and best practice guidance relating to a number of employment uses, including those within the Moat Way Industrial sustainability themes. Estate. The rate of vacant retail units within Earl Shilton and Barwell is higher than within the other centres of the Borough. The plans, programmes and guidance that need to be considered include those at international, national, regional and local scale. A Housing and Services review of the plans and programmes has been undertaken to ensure There is a shortage of affordable housing within the Borough, they are up to date, and to ensure that consultation comments have particularly in the rental sector. been taken into account. A summary and update of the plans and programmes is provided in Appendix A2 of this report. The health of the Borough residents is relatively good in comparison to the rest of England, with life expectancy higher than the national average. Deprivation is generally lower than average within the 4.2 Summary of Baseline Information Borough. However, both the settlements of Barwell and Earl Shilton contain significant pockets of deprivation (amongst the most deprived The Scoping Report undertaken by the Council in June 2012 set out a neighbourhoods in Leicestershire), particularly in relation to income, comprehensive review of the baseline situation with regard to social, education skills and training, employment and health, and both areas economic and environmental factors within the borough. This SA has are in need of regeneration. further reviewed the baseline information with particular regard to the site specific issues within the AAP area. The review of baseline Data from the 2001 Census revealed that the population across Earl information identified some additional baseline data, which is set out Shilton and Barwell is characterised by poor educational attainment in in Appendix A3 . The key issues relating to the AAP area are relation to the national levels. The poor perception, reputation and summarised below. attainment levels within secondary schools in Earl Shilton, in Population, Economy and Employment comparison with Hinckley, have resulted in problems with local schools attracting new students. Within the study area, Earl Shilton is the slightly larger settlement
containing around 4,489 dwellings (9,250 residents) and Barwell Barwell is well serviced by congregational community facilities. consisting of about 4,067 dwellings (8,750 residents). Both Earl Barwell has no secondary education provision and children between Shilton and Barwell have a rich industrial history in the textile trade, the ages of 11-14 and 14-18 must travel to Earl Shilton. which has suffered decline since the 1970s as a result of foreign
competition. The services within Earl Shilton and Barwell are facing
increasing threat from bigger, neighbouring centres.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 19 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
William Bradford College in Earl Shilton is one of only two secondary The Earl Shilton bypass was completed in March 2009, and is located schools in the Borough providing education up to the ages of 18 years. to the east of the town. It forms the southern and eastern boundaries Therefore Earl Shilton provides for the full educational needs of its of the Earl Shilton SUE. Ashby Road is the main highway relevant to younger residents. the Barwell SUE, and it runs along the west of the site. Stapleton Lane bisects the site into northern and southern sections. Provision of pre-school places and nursery services is very low and there is little access for residents to affordable childcare. The infrequency and lack of linkages within the bus services has been highlighted as a problem, given that it is the main form of public Although in real terms the crime level within Hinckley and Bosworth transport in the Borough. Rail service provision within Hinckley and has reduced between 2006/2007 and 2009/2010, it is important to Bosworth has been identified as poor. note that, through consultation, fear of crime has been identified as a significant concern within the area. There is limited existing vehicular access within Earl Shilton, and limited road connections from the town centre to the SUE area. Public There is a new community centre within Barwell, but it is not well footpaths cross the SUE site. There is a network of cycle routes within connected to the village centre. the Borough, which forms part of the SUSTRANS National Cycleway.
Tourism and Recreation Pedestrian and cycle permeability is generally good within Earl There are a number of visitor attractions and recreational/ cultural Shilton and Barwell. Traffic within Earl Shilton has recently been activities available within the borough. The Core Strategy seeks to reduced, although the centre itself is not pedestrian friendly. Car enhance the tourism offer of the Borough through developing a ‘sense parking provision is very limited within Barwell, which is a deterrent to of place’. residents looking to fulfil their shopping and service needs within the centre. Traffic and Transport Accessibility to the strategic network is generally good within the Geological Environment Borough, although some isolated rural areas suffer limited access. There are some areas of contaminated land in the Borough, which There is a high level of private car ownership owing to the rural nature are legacies of industrial use and waste disposal. There is a large of the Borough, as well as the good access to major road routes. public open space immediately adjacent to the Barwell SUE site, Although there are high levels of congestion at peak times, along which is a restored landfill. The Leicestershire County Council’s corridors such as the A5, there is evidence that implementation of Resources Map indicates the potential presence of pockets of glacial Green Travel Plans has prevented an increase in congestion and sand and gravel deposits within both SUE sites. reduction in car travel when compared with earlier predictions.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 20 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Waste Biodiversity and Nature Conservation Recycling rates within Hinckley and Bosworth are higher than the Hinckley and Bosworth Borough hosts a number of ecologically regional and national rates. There are proposals at the regional level important sites, including seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest to enhance waste collection and segregation services, as well as (SSSIs), two Local Nature Reserves (LNRs), Local Wildlife Sites enhanced treatment and processing technology. Barwell (LWSs), Ancient Woodlands, and part of the National Forest. The accommodates a Recycling and Household Waste Site. Leicestershire authorities have agreed to work together to manage and promote the unique cultural and heritage features of the Water Environment Charnwood Forest through the creation of Charnwood Forest Park. There are no primary aquifers in the Borough. Severn Trent Water The Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan has indicated that water available for use is sufficient to meet future has identified a number of species and habitats for conservation. demand, with headroom, to 2015, but that beyond that, additional resources and treatment capacity will need to be identified. Flood risk There is a Local Wildlife Site, Little Fields Farm Meadow, located resulting as a consequence of climate change has been identified as within the Barwell SUE area. A large area to the north west of the site a likely issue. is designated as a Biodiversity Improvement area (BIA). Another BIA lies to the south of Barwell, the Hinckley Area Parkland Restoration The River Tweed and its flood area run through the Barwell study site. Phase 1 Habitat Surveys have been undertaken within both the area. A number of small water courses are in the vicinity of Earl Barwell and Earl Shilton SUE areas, the findings of which have Shilton and Barwell, including Earl Shilton Brook, Thurlaston Brook identified areas to be assessed further at the detailed planning stage. and the Normanton Brook. The towns and surrounding area are classified as a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone. Earl Shilton is the location of Land Uses, Landscape and Visual Amenity a Waste Water Treatment Works and Sewer, which is operated by The landscape of Hinckley and Bosworth borough is gently rolling and Severn Water. predominantly rural in nature. The Borough’s Landscape Character Assessment (2006) identifies the range and diversity of landscapes The Environment Agency’s flood zone mapping indicates that Earl as a significant asset, and acknowledges the extent of decline Shilton, and the majority of Barwell, lie within flood risk zone 1 (i.e. the resulting from intensive agricultural production and the decline of the probability of flooding is less than 1 in 1,000 and hence very slight). A mining industry. short section of the River Tweed runs through Barwell and its floodplain is a development constraint. There is an area of land between Earl Shilton and Hinckley designated as ‘Green Wedge’, the aim of which is to create green Surface water flooding during heavy rainfall has been identified as a linkages between the urban open spaces and the Countryside, and to chronic issue for Earl Shilton and Barwell, as a result of poor drainage. retain and enhance public access, especially for recreation. A review of the two Green Wedges within the Borough was undertaken in 2011, which recommended that, in relation to Hinckley/Barwell/Earl Shilton/Burbage Green Wedge, St Mary’s Churchyard within Barwell be extended into the green wedge. It was also recommended that John Cleveland College Playing Fields be included within the green Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 21 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Wedge, as it is a recreational resource and a green lung.
Earl Shilton town centre is largely a traditional linear High Street, with In addition there are 26 designated Conservation Areas. The entire buildings arranged in terraces. There are some poor quality shop length of the Ashby Canal is a Conservation Area. It is important to fronts within the centre, and public spaces are of poor quality. Barwell note that there is potential for archaeological sites and areas of contains buildings of a variety of sizes, scales and architectural styles. cultural significance to exist within the AAP areas, which are not Public spaces are of poor quality. currently known.
Some older parts of both towns are designated as Areas of Special The earthwork remains of Earl Shilton Castle and the partial ruins of Character, as a result of their distinctive nature. the Elmesthorpe Church lie in the immediate vicinity of the Earl Shilton SUE. Barwell House Farm, within the Barwell SUE area, is The centres of Earl Shilton and Barwell grew rapidly during the afforded Grade II listing. Carousel Park is a culturally important site industrial boom in the last century so that they effectively have within the AAP area, the function of which is to meet the needs of merged into one single urban form, and lack separate identities. travelling showpeople. Artefacts and some potential archaeological features have been found during fieldwork in and around the study The Earl Shilton SUE area has a total land area of 71.6Ha comprising area. primarily of mixed arable and pasture landscape, a cemetery and a sewage treatment works. Visually sensitive land has been identified to Noise and Vibration the north of Earl Shilton. Noise pollution within the Borough is associated with the busy road corridors within the Borough, such as the A5, A46, A50, M69 and M1. The Barwell SUE area has a total land area of 116.45Ha, comprising The new Earl Shilton Bypass has been identified as a noise source in primarily mixed arable and pasture landscape, small areas of semi the Earl Shilton SUE. improved and rough grassland, a household waste recycling centre, a Carousel Park for travelling showmen, and a large recreation ground. Air and Climate An overhead 33kV power line crosses the site to the north west. The There are no Air Quality Management Areas declared within Hinckley Barwell SUE contains a number of the important landscape and and Bosworth Borough. The most likely impact of climate change ecological features within the Borough. Visually sensitive land has within the Borough has been identified as the higher rainfall intensity been identified to the north-east and the south-west of Barwell. resulting in an increased number and severity of flooding events. The
Council is working to reduce the impacts of climate change through a Cultural Heritage and Archaeology number of measures, such as signing the Nottingham Declaration, The Borough contains a number of important features including 22 producing a Carbon Management Plan and setting targets for Scheduled Monuments, Bosworth Battlefield (which is included in the reducing overall CO 2 from all its operations. register of Historic Battlefields prepared by English Heritage) and a range of listed buildings. These are important to the Borough, not only for their historical significance but also as a tourist attraction.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 22 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Early Phases of Development Outline planning permission has been granted for the Barwell SUE to include: • 2,500 new residential dwellings • Employment Zone for uses B2 and B8, up to 24,800m 2 • Sports pitches, pavilion building and changing rooms • Areas of formal and informal open space • Children’s play areas • Allotments • Primary school • Local healthcare facility • Public House/ Restaurant • Local Retail/ Commercial units up to 1,000m 2.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 23 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
5 Sustainability Issues and Objectives
5.1 Sustainability Issues Sustainability issues within Hinckley and Bosworth have been
identified during the preparation of the Core Strategy (Local Plan) and Geological Environment are based on existing documents, strategies, assessments and • The need to reduce the amount of waste produced; and consultation. The issues are set out in more detail in the Scoping • Report 2012 and summarised below: The need to increase the proportion of waste that is recycled Water Environment Economy and Employment • Future flood risk associated with climate change. • Maintenance of the rural economy and opportunities for • Future development in the flood plain and increased surface diversification; and water run-off could increase flood risk to properties. • The need to improve the vitality of Hinckley town centre and other District and Local Centres. Biodiversity and Nature Conservation • The need to protect and enhance both statutory and non statutory Population and Quality of Life sites designated for nature conservation; • The need to improve physical activity and health • The need to protect habitats and species listed in the Biodiversity • The potential closure of services and facilities and resulting Action Plan; impact upon accessibility and social exclusion; • The need to create new habitats. • The shortage of affordable housing; and • The need to reduce the fear of crime. Landscape and Visual Amenity • The potential impact of development upon the rural landscape Tourism and Recreation character of the borough; • The need to maintain Hinckley and Bosworth’s position as a • The need to maintain and enhance the setting of the National tourism destination particularly in relation to the National Forest; Forest; and and • The need to protect sites of landscape importance. • Realise the potential that increasing the tourism appeal of the borough will attract more people, who may travel longer distances, Cultural Heritage and Archaeology • particularly to Bosworth Battlefield as it is a site of international The need to preserve the setting and sites of archaeological and importance. cultural heritage interest both known and unknown; and • Potential conflicts between the need to conserve historical sites Traffic and Transport and the promotion of tourism. • Traffic congestion during peak times; • High levels of private car use; Noise and Vibration • • Poor quality of bus services and lack of links between some Noise pollution associated with the road corridors in the borough. villages; and Air and Climate • The need for safer routes for pedestrians and cyclists. • Improving air quality to maintain the absence of AQMAs in the Borough. • The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; and • Potential climate change related impacts upon Hinckley and Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 24 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Bosworth. • Reduce CO 2 emissions.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 25 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
5.2 Sustainability Objectives
A compatibility assessment of the Sustainability Objectives was carried out and is set out in Appendix A4, which found the objectives SO11 To conserve and enhance woodland cover in the borough, to be broadly compatible. particularly in the National Forest area. SO1 To ensure the provision of decent and affordable housing SO12 To manage prudently water resources, improve water that meets local needs and links into the provision of quality and protect the floodplain. services. SO13 To improve air quality particularly through reducing transport SO2 To improve health and reduce health inequalities by related pollutants promoting healthy lifestyles, protecting health and providing SO14 To manage prudently mineral resources and avoid / reduce access to health services. pollution of land. SO3 To provide better opportunities for local people and tourists SO15 To minimise energy use and develop renewable energy to access and understand local heritage. resources. SO4 To improve access to and participation in cultural and SO16 To reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the rate of leisure activities. climate change. SO5 To improve community safety, reduce the fear of crime and SO17 To improve access to education and training for children, reduce anti-social behaviour, particularly in Hinckley town young people and adult learners. centre. SO18 To develop a strong culture of enterprise and innovation SO6 To promote and support the empowerment of local whilst providing access to appropriate employment communities in creating and implementing solutions that opportunities for the local population, particularly in rural meet their needs focusing particularly on young, elderly and areas. deprived people. SO19 To help farmers diversify their agricultural activities or SO7 To protect and enhance the natural environment (species venture into new rural businesses. To help other rural and habitats) whilst contributing to the achievement of businesses diversify their activities. Biodiversity Action Plan targets. SO20 To optimise the use of previously developed land, buildings SO8 To conserve and enhance the character, diversity and local and existing infrastructure. distinctiveness of towns and villages in Hinckley and Bosworth district. SO21 To promote and ensure high standards of sustainable design and construction. SO9 To preserve and enhance the character and appearance and setting of archaeological sites, historic buildings, SO22 To minimise waste and to increase the re-use and recycling conservation sites, historic parks and other cultural assets. of waste materials. SO10 To conserve and enhance the character, diversity and local SO23 To improve access to services, particularly for the rural distinctiveness of the rural landscape in the Borough population, those without a car and for disabled, elderly and deprived people.
SO24 To encourage and develop the use of public transport,
cycling and walking as alternatives to the private car.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 26 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
6 Sustainability Appraisal Framework
6.1 The SA Framework
Sustainability Objectives Indicators Targets SO1 To ensure the provision of decent - Percentage of affordable homes completed (NI154) - A minimum of 2090 affordable and affordable housing that meets homes to be provided in the Borough local needs and links into the over the period 2006-26. provision of services. - Housing quality – Building for Life Assessment - All developments of 10 or more dwellings are required to meet a ‘very good’ rating against the Building for - New homes being provided (NI154). Life Criteria. - Minimum of 9000 dwellings from 2006-2026 (Minimum 450 annually) SO2 To improve health and reduce - Early deaths: heart disease & stroke rate per 100,000 - Reduce health inequalities by promoting population under 75
healthy lifestyles, protecting health - Early deaths: cancer per 100,000 population under 75 and providing access to health - Percentage of population living with limiting long term - Reduce services. illness. - Reduce SO3 To provide better opportunities for - Number of archaeological sites - Increase local people and tourists to access - Number of historic sites in Hinckley and Bosworth - Increase and understand local heritage. SO4 To improve access to and - Total number of attendances at Active Together - Increase participation in cultural and leisure physical activity sessions (LI16) activities. - Adult participation in sport and active recreation (NI8) - Increase - Creation and regeneration of existing cultural and - Hinckley Leisure Centre leisure facilities - Improvements to the quality of open spaces identified - Minimum 80% quality score(except within the Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 Study in the indoor sports) Borough. SO5 To improve community safety, - Number of hate crimes reported to the local authority - Reduce reduce the fear of crime and (LI174) reduce anti-social behaviour, - Burglary of a dwelling - Reduce particularly in Hinckley town - Theft of a motor vehicle - Reduce centre. - Recorded Crime Offences - Reduce - Serious Violent Crime Rate (NI15). - Reduce
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 27 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Sustainability Objectives Indicators Targets SO6 To promote and support the - Improve the ranking in the index of multiple deprivation for - Improve empowerment of local communities the Borough’s most deprived wards in creating and implementing - Percentage of vulnerable people who are supported to - Increase solutions that meet their needs maintain independent living (NI142) focusing particularly on young, - Number of apprenticeships. - Increase elderly and deprived people. - Participation in voluntary and community facilities - Increase SO7 To protect and enhance the natural - Area/Number of statutory and non-statutory sites - No reduction in number or area of environment (species and habitats) designated as sites of ecological importance. sites whilst contributing to the - Area/Number of statutory and non-statutory sites - Increase achievement of Biodiversity Action designated as sites of ecological importance in favourable Plan targets. condition - Change in priority habitats and species - No reduction in area - Number of planning applications adversely affecting a - Reduce Local Wildlife Site, candidate Local Wildlife Site, Local Nature Reserve, SSSI, or BAP habitat - Length of hedgerow which could be reclassified under the - Reduce hedgerow regulation lost as a result of development - Area of BAP habitats that would be created, restored, or - Increase managed if planning permission was implemented - Number of new populations of protected species found via - Increase/Maintain planning process - The area (ha) of existing urban green space for which - Increase management is implemented to enhance wildlife, as a direct result of the planning process - The number of habitats enhancement projects taken - Increase forward as a direct result of the planning process - Number of planning applications involving a BAP habitat - Increase being created as a result of new development - Number of existing (known) populations of protected - Reduce species adversely affected by a planning decision. SO8 To conserve and enhance the - All conservation areas to have an up to date published - All character, diversity and local conservation area appraisal by 2013. distinctiveness of towns and - Number of Listed Buildings Demolished - No loss of Listed Buildings
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 28 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
villages in Hinckley and Bosworth - Decrease the number of Grade II Listed Buildings at risk - Reduce district. - Number of vacant retail units within Hinckley Town Centre - Reduce
Sustainability Objectives Indicators Targets SO9 To preserve and enhance the - Buildings at Risk - None character and appearance and - Bosworth Battlefield - None setting of archaeological sites, - Place of worship - None historic buildings, conservation - Scheduled Monuments - None sites, historic parks and other cultural assets. SO10 To conserve and enhance the - Percentage of development on brownfield land. - 40% - Area covered by Landscape Character Assessment. character, diversity and local - Borough-wide distinctiveness of the rural landscape in the Borough. SO11 To conserve and enhance - Area of woodland creation. - 4000-5000 hectares (2004-2014). - Halve the loss of existing black poplar woodland cover in the borough, - Number of planting sites. particularly in the National Forest trees in the National Forest Area. area. SO12 To manage prudently water - Percentage of planning applications granted which - Increase propose water conserving methods (e.g. rain resources, improve water quality and protect the floodplain. wastewater/greywater systems). - Planning permission granted contrary to Environment - Nil Agency advice on either flood defence grounds or water quality. - Planning permission granted with Sustainable Urban - Increase Drainage System - Number of buildings built in the 1 in 100 year floodplain. - Reduce SO13 To improve air quality particularly - Proportion of people travelling to work by car. - Reduce - Number of Air Quality Management Areas. through reducing transport related - None pollutants. SO14 To manage prudently mineral - Percentage of completed dwellings on previously - 40% developed land. resources and avoid / reduce pollution of land. - Percentage of reported fly tips collected within 5 days - Increase (LHE20A). - Percentage of household waste sent for reuse, recycling, and composting(NI192). - Increase Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 29 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Sustainability Objectives Indicators Targets - Renewable energy generation. SO15 To minimise energy use and - Increase - All developments of 10 or more dwellings are required to develop renewable energy - Increase resources. meet a ‘very good’ rating against the Building for Life criteria. - CO2 reduction from Local Authority operations (NI185). - Increase - Public buildings to meet a minimum of BREEAM (or - Increase equivalent) assessment rating of ‘very good’ from 2009-
2016 and ‘excellent’ from 2016 onwards. - Planning to adapt to climate change (NI188). - Increase - Developments in Key Rural Centres and Rural Villages - Increase will be expected to meet the sustainability targets set out in Building a Greener Future. - Proportion of people travelling to work by car. SO16 To reduce greenhouse gas - Reduce - Renewable Energy Generation. emissions to mitigate the rate of - Increase climate change. - All developments of 10 or more dwellings are required to meet a ‘very good’ rating against the Building for Life - Increase criteria. - CO2 reduction from Local Authority operations (NI185). - Increase - Planning to adapt to climate change (NI188). - Increase - Public buildings to meet a minimum of BREEAM (or - Increase equivalent) assessment rating of ‘very good’ from 2009- 2016 and ‘excellent’ from 2016 onwards. - Developments in Key Rural Centres and Rural Villages will be expected to meet the sustainability targets set out - Increase in Building a Greener Future. - Percentage of pupils achieving 5 GCSE A* to C Grades. SO17 To improve access to education - Increase - Percentage of working age with no qualifications. and training for children, young - Reduce people and adult learners. - Number of schools subject to special measures. - Number of schools subject to notices to improve. - Maintain Nil - Maintain Nil
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 30 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Sustainability Objectives Indicators Targets - Overall employment rate (NI151). SO18 To develop a strong culture of - Increase enterprise and innovation whilst - Economic activity rate. - Increase providing access to appropriate - Number of apprenticeships - Increase employment opportunities for the - New business registrations (NI171). - Increase local population, particularly in rural - Total amount of additional gross employment floor space. areas. - Increase - Percentage of rural wards on low income. SO19 To help farmers diversify their - Decrease - Percentage of employment in agriculture. agricultural activities or venture into - Increase new rural businesses. To help - The number of successful new farm diversification - Increase other rural businesses diversify schemes. their activities. - Percentage of housing completions on previously - Core Strategy target minimum 40% SO20 To optimise the use of previously developed land, buildings and developed land. existing infrastructure. - Area of derelict land. - Reduce - Percentage of new houses built on greenfield land - Reduce - Residential developments to meet the following Code for SO21 To promote and ensure high - Increase Sustainable Homes levels: Minimum of Code Level 3 to standards of sustainable design and construction. 2013; Minimum of Code Level 4 from 2013 to 2016; and Minimum of Code Level 6 from 2016 onwards. - Residential developments in Key Rural Centres and Rural Villages will be expected to meet the sustainability targets - Increase set out in Building a Greener Future. - Public buildings to meet a minimum of BREEAM (or equivalent) assessment rating of ‘excellent’ from 2016 onwards and excellent from 2016 onwards. - Increase - Percentage of reported fly tips collected within 5 days SO22 To minimise waste and to increase - Increase the re-use and recycling of waste (LHE20a). materials. - Percentage of household waste sent for reuse, recycling - Increase and composting (NI192). - Satisfaction with waste collection (BV90a). - Increase
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 31 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Sustainability Objectives Indicators Targets - Provide local services within Bagworth. SO23 To improve access to services, - Increase - No loss of existing services in the Key Rural Centres and particularly for the rural population, - No loss those without a car and for Rural Villages.
disabled, elderly and deprived - Percentage of households within 15 minutes walking people. distance to a food store. - Improve - Percentage of households within 15 minutes walking distance of a GP. - Improve - Deliver the transport interchange at Hinckley Railway SO24 To encourage and develop the use - Delivery Station by 2016. of public transport, cycling and walking as alternatives to the - Implementation of Hinckley and Rural Parishes cycle - Implement private car. network plan by 2026. - To reduce the proportion of people travelling to work by car by 2026. - Reduce
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 32 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
7 AAP Issues and Options
7.1 Assessment of Plan Objectives against SA Framework The AAP Objectives have been assessed against the Sustainability In these instances, the uncertainties again reiterate the need to Objectives to identify any potential areas of conflict. Table 7.1 below develop detailed policies to guide deliverable and quantifiable sets out a summary of the findings on the assessment of the sustainable development. Other uncertainties identified relationship between the Objectives. opportunities to enhance proposals within the AAP e.g. planting additional woodland as part of green infrastructure (AAP Appendix A5 sets out a detailed commentary on the appraisal of each Objective 8) and linking new development with existing AAP Objective against each Sustainability Objective. The following is infrastructure (AAP Objective 9). a summary of the main issues identified.
In general, all of the AAP Objectives have a positive relationship with the Sustainability Objectives, contributing to the provision of mixed communities with access to services and employment, enhanced enjoyment of natural resources and regeneration of existing centres that are in decline. The following are areas where the potential for negative impacts has been identified: • Impact of the new SUE areas on the rural landscape of the Borough • Construction impacts of new development, and loss of natural resources as a result of development on Greenfield land
Highlighting these potential negative impacts at the strategic level enables policies at the more detailed level to be developed to lessen or mitigate the impacts.
The testing of the AAP Objectives against the Sustainability Objectives raised uncertainties in some areas, such as: • Impact of new SUE areas on setting of existing Earl Shilton and Barwell centres • Impact of new development on archaeological and historical features • Standards of sustainable design and construction
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 33 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Table 7.1: Summary of SA of Assessment of AAP Objectives Area Action Plan Objectives Sustainability Objectives AAP1 AAP2 AAP3 AAP4 AAP5 AAP6 AAP7 AAP8 AAP9 SO1 To ensure the provision of decent and affordable housing that meets local needs and links into the provision of services. SO2 To improve health and reduce health inequalities by promoting healthy lifestyles, protecting health and providing access to health services. SO3 To provide better opportunities for local people and tourists to access and understand local heritage. SO4 To improve access to and participation in cultural and leisure activities.
SO5 To improve community safety, reduce the fear of crime and reduce anti- social behaviour, particularly in Hinckley town centre. SO6 To promote and support the empowerment of local communities in creating and implementing solutions that meet their needs focusing particularly on young, elderly and deprived people. SO7 To protect and enhance the natural environment (species and habitats) whilst contributing to the achievement of Biodiversity Action Plan targets. SO8 To conserve and enhance the character, diversity and local distinctiveness of towns and villages in Hinckley and Bosworth district. SO9 To preserve and enhance the character and appearance and setting of archaeological sites, historic buildings, conservation sites, historic parks and other cultural assets. SO10 To conserve and enhance the character, diversity and local distinctiveness of the rural landscape in the Borough. SO11 To conserve and enhance woodland cover in the borough, particularly in the National Forest area. SO12 To manage prudently water resources, improve water quality and protect the floodplain. SO13 To improve air quality particularly through reducing transport related pollutants.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 34 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Area Action Plan Objectives Sustainability Objectives AAP1 AAP2 AAP3 AAP4 AAP5 AAP6 AAP7 AAP8 AAP9 SO14 To manage prudently mineral resources and avoid / reduce pollution of land. SO15 To minimise energy use and develop renewable energy resources.
SO16 To reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the rate of climate change. SO17 To improve access to education and training for children, young people and adult learners. SO18 To develop a strong culture of enterprise and innovation whilst providing access to appropriate employment opportunities for the local population, particularly in rural areas. SO19 To help farmers diversify their agricultural activities or venture into new rural businesses. To help other rural businesses diversify their activities. SO20 To optimise the use of previously developed land, buildings and existing infrastructure. SO21 To promote and ensure high standards of sustainable design and construction. SO22 To minimise waste and to increase the re-use and recycling of waste materials. SO23 To improve access to services, particularly for the rural population, those without a car and for disabled, elderly and deprived people. SO24 To encourage and develop the use of public transport, cycling and walking as alternatives to the private car. KEY Major negative impact Minor negative impact Uncertain impact Minor positive impact Major positive impact No significant impact
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 35 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
7.2 Development of the AAP Options
Background Earl Shilton & Barwell Sustainable Urban Extensions The East Midlands Regional Plan (revoked April 2013) set out a requirement for 9,000 homes to be built in Hinckley & Bosworth Land is allocated to the south east of Earl Shilton and to the west of between 2006-2026. In determining the distribution of development, Barwell for Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs). Earl Shilton and the East Midlands Regional Plan sought to concentrate development Barwell contain pockets of significant deprivation, particularly relating in urban areas whilst also providing for the development needs of to income, education skills and training, employment and health and rural areas. The Plan identified a target of 60% of additional their local centres are in need of regeneration. The areas suffer from dwellings to be developed on previously developed land or through multiple deprivation and are designated Local Strategic Partnership conversions. ‘priority neighbourhoods’ with targeted actions for improvement. To support this regeneration and to reinvigorate these important The Council’s analysis of development sites in the Borough indicated urban areas, two mixed use Sustainable Urban Extensions are that the East Midlands Regional Plan target would not be achievable proposed, one of 2500 homes to the west of Barwell and one of 1600 and a target of 40% of dwellings on previously developed land was homes to the south of Earl Shilton. In addition, to ensure the therefore proposed. Sustainable Urban Extensions are sustainable, the need to allocate a The Core Strategy 2009 set out the direction of growth for the further 20-25 ha of employment land to support the population in Borough and identified the need to establish the Sustainable Urban these new communities was identified in the Leicester and Extensions at Earl Shilton and Barwell as set out in Policy 2 and 3. Leicestershire HMA Employment Land Study, 2008. The employment The land south of Earl Shilton and west of Barwell was chosen over land figure has subsequently been revised down to approximately the alternatives (north of Shilton and south of Barwell) during the 11ha as set out in the King Sturge Employment Study, 2010. preparation of the Core Strategy because they are affected by fewer Initial Options constraints as set out in the Directions for Growth 2007. Capita Lovejoy was commissioned to prepare Masterplan Options for Alternatives were rejected because they were more affected by: the Earl Shilton and Barwell Action Plan. The Masterplan Options • Power and gas lines report (November 2009) documents the preparation of a series of • Wildlife sites ‘Spatial Options’ for the regeneration of Earl Shilton and Barwell. Six • Floodplain options were appraised (two options for each of the proposed SUEs • Land currently reserved as ‘Green Wedge’ to separate Barwell and one option for generating each settlement centre). These options from Hinckley were used for the preparation of the final masterplan (the ‘preferred’ • option), which was the subject of consultation by stakeholders and the Land at a higher elevation with greater visual impact. general public in November and December 2009 and March 2010. In addition, the alternatives did not have the advantages of roads The options were generated by the project team, which involved close acting as natural barriers to further expansion, unlike the allocated collaboration between the consultants and council officers, following sites. an inception day workshop (July 2009) and the preparation of an extensive evidence base. The Masterplan options were amended to reflect a number of the early conclusions of the above consultations. In respect of the Earl Shilton SUE, the options were revised to present two options that were more distinct in highlighting potential approaches to the key site issues, notably the Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW). Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 36 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Preferred Options The consultation on the Preferred Options raised the following issues The preferred options were presented to the community via a manned of concern, which are set out in more detail in the Summary of exhibition in October 2010 and set out in the Consultation Draft of the Matters and Issues Appendix A10 : Earl Shilton and Barwell AAP, November 2010. An interim Housing Sustainability Appraisal of the AAP, Capita Symonds, January 2011 – justification for the level, density and location of housing tested five options as follows: – impact upon district centres and surrounding area PO1 Earl Shilton SUE (retains WWTW) – development of greenfield land PO2 Earl Shilton SUE (replaces WWTW) Transport PO3 Barwell SUE – impacts of road borne transport PO4 Earl Shilton existing – car parking PO5 Barwell existing – impact upon Strategic Highway Network and delivery of transport The land chosen for the SUEs is immediately adjacent to the existing infrastructure built up area of each settlement in order to: Employment and Retail • Ensure the greatest benefit to the settlement centres of Earl – provision of employment land Shilton and Barwell • Facilitate ease of access between the new homes and Hinckley Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW) itself, with its services and employment opportunities – capacity of existing facility • Maximise the opportunity for joint public transport servicing of the – funding of water and sewage drainage upgrades or relocation existing and new housing areas, and to make viable routes within – flood risk and water quality new developments. Waste Management – insufficient consideration of waste management provision Some outstanding technical matters were identified, to be resolved – insufficient capacity of infrastructure through the masterplanning process. In particular, it was identified – need for additional facilities that further discussions with Leicestershire County Council Highways be undertaken, before wider public consultation was carried out, to Natural and Historic Environment examine the acceptability in principle of the specific access – no acknowledgement of habitats under threat arrangements proposed that underpin the SUE Masterplan Options. – recommendation for a landscape and nature conservation management plan Please refer to the Capita Symonds, January 2011 for further – use of native plant material and local provenance information on the options. Historic Environment – protection of setting of historic buildings
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 37 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Education Gypsy and Traveller Sites – closure of the existing school and pupil capacity – need for additional pitches/S106 obligations – landscape buffer Sport, Recreation and Public Open Space – impacts upon existing provision Green Infrastructure – equipment of formal play areas – retain/enhancement of assets – maintenance – public access to a Local Wildlife Site – financial contributions from developers – educational resource – need for an audit of sports provision Appendices District Centres and Community Facilities – design standards – regeneration - new business vs. old business Consultation Process – public realm and funding – options considered – health care – previous consultations/publicity – cemeteries
Design – design and materials – energy production and consumption including renewables Draft Submission Version – urban greening The Draft Submission Version AAP has been amended to take into consideration the consultation responses to the Preferred Options Water Resources and Management and additional evidence for the masterplans, in particular, the – sustainable water management Strategic Transport Assessment, the infrastructure requirements and – surface water reduction the Viability Assessment. A further Sustainability Appraisal (this – water efficiency and conservation document) has therefore been undertaken to ensure that the new Other Infrastructure Provision evidence is fully considered in the assessment. – additional community facilities The SA has assessed the same five options that were identified at the – funding of infrastructure Preferred Options stage to ensure that the new evidence has not – contributions and CIL tests changed the sustainability outcomes, in addition to the final preferred – viability of developer contributions being sought option for Earl Shilton, which is a combination of Options 1 and 2. – phasing/timetable The detailed results of the options appraisal are set out in Section 8 of Policing this report and Appendix A6 . – resources
– neighbourhood policing
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 38 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
7.3 Development of the AAP Policies and Proposals
The SA has also assessed the proposed policies for the AAP against the SA framework. The number of policies has been reduced from 34 in the preferred options to 26 in the submission version, to remove duplication of issues that are addressed in the Core Strategy. The results of the policy appraisal are set out in Section 8 of this report and Appendix A8 . A summary of the policy changes can be found in Appendix A9.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 39 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
8 Sustainability Effects of the AAP
8.1 How has sustainability been considered in the development of the plan? The land chosen for development of the SUEs is immediately Sustainability has been considered from the outset of the adjacent to the existing built up area of each settlement in order to: development of the plan and has been subject to Sustainability • Ensure the greatest benefit to the settlement centres of Earl assessment throughout including the following documents: Shilton and Barwell
• Facilitate ease of access between the new homes and the wider – Initial Scoping Report, November 2009 Hinckley urban area, with its services and employment – Sustainability Appraisal of the Masterplan Options, June 2010 opportunities – Interim Sustainability Appraisal, Capita Symonds, January 2011. • Maximise the opportunity for joint public transport servicing of the – Updated Scoping Report June 2012 existing and new housing areas and to make viable routes to serve new developments. The main aim of the Area Action Plan is to guide the development of two Sustainable Urban Extensions to provide additional homes and The Strategy for the settlements is for the urban extensions to be encourage the regeneration of the existing settlements. sustainable solutions for growth. A mix of land uses is therefore proposed including, residential, employment and community facilities. The Overall Vision for the AAP is: The development will also provide the opportunity for the enhancement of the existing facilities and regeneration of Earl Shilton and Barwell. “To see the development of sustainable communities with distinct identities and character, The development is to be an exemplar of Sustainable Design and providing attractive and accessible living and must comply with Core Strategy Core Strategy Policy 24: Sustainable Design and Technology. The Environmental Impact Assessment and working environments and thriving urban centres. Design and Access Statement that accompany the planning The centres will be well connected to Hinckley applications will need to demonstrate how this will be achieved. and the surrounding countryside and supported by infrastructure that encourages green living.”
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 40 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
8.2 Significant sustainability effects of the Options
A summary of the SA of the AAP Options is provided below. The detailed results can be found in Appendix A6
Area Action Plan - Options Sustainability Objectives ES (SUE) 1 ES (SUE) 2 ES (Exist) 3 ES (SUE) 4 B (SUE) 5 B (Exist) 6 SO1 To ensure the provision of decent and affordable housing that meets local needs and links into the provision of services. SO2 To improve health and reduce health inequalities by promoting healthy lifestyles, protecting health and providing access to health services. SO3 To provide better opportunities for local people and tourists to access and understand local heritage SO4 To improve access to and participation in cultural and leisure activities.
SO5 To improve community safety, reduce the fear of crime and reduce anti-social behaviour, particularly in Hinckley town centre. SO6 To promote and support the empowerment of local communities in creating and implementing solutions that meet their needs focusing particularly on young, elderly and deprived people. SO7 To protect and enhance the natural environment (species and habitats) whilst contributing to the achievement of Biodiversity Action Plan targets. SO8 To conserve and enhance the character, diversity and local distinctiveness of towns and villages in Hinckley and Bosworth district. SO9 To preserve and enhance the character and appearance and setting of archaeological sites, historic buildings, conservation sites, historic parks and other cultural assets SO10 To conserve and enhance the character, diversity and local distinctiveness of the rural landscape in the Borough SO11 To conserve and enhance woodland cover in the borough, particularly in the National Forest area. SO12 To manage prudently water resources, improve water quality and protect the floodplain.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 41 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Area Action Plan - Options Sustainability Objectives ES (SUE) 1 ES (SUE) 2 ES (Exist) 3 ES (SUE) 4 B (SUE) 5 B (Exist) 6 SO13 To improve air quality particularly through reducing transport related pollutants
SO14 To manage prudently mineral resources and avoid / reduce pollution of land.
SO15 To minimise energy use and develop renewable energy resources
SO16 To reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the rate of climate change.
SO17 To improve access to education and training for children, young people and adult learners.
SO18 To develop a strong culture of enterprise and innovation whilst providing access to appropriate employment opportunities for the local population, particularly in rural areas. SO19 To help farmers diversify their agricultural activities or venture into new rural businesses. To help other rural businesses diversify their activities. SO20 To optimise the use of previously developed land, buildings and existing infrastructure.
SO21 To promote and ensure high standards of sustainable design and construction.
SO22 To minimise waste and to increase the re-use and recycling of waste materials.
SO23 To improve access to services, particularly for the rural population, those without a car and for disabled, elderly and deprived people. SO24 To encourage and develop the use of public transport, cycling and walking as alternatives to the private car.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 42 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
The results show that the SUEs both perform well compared to the existing settlements as they provide the opportunity for regeneration The majority of impacts for Earl Shilton Options 1 and 2 are positive, and enhancement of current provision and facilities. although are unlikely to be realised in the short term until the development is complete. Some negative impacts may occur in the Earl Shilton: Option 1 short term during construction. Specific mitigation measures will be The Earl Shilton SUE Option 1 retains the Waste Water Treatment need to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Works (WWTW) on the site, which means approximately 40 ha of Design and Access Statement that should accompany any planning land can be developed for approximately 1400 homes. The SUE is to application. In general, uncertain results relate to impacts where provide an exemplar of sustainable design and provide a catalyst for further work will be required at the detailed stage. the regeneration of the existing settlement. The retention of the The impact on noise is not identified in the SA Framework but is WWTW on site restricts the amount of developable land available. acknowledged in the Implementation Plan of the AAP and should be The WWTW also provides restrictions in the type of neighbouring considered as part of any planning application in relation to transport development that can occur and may provide issues in relation to and construction impacts. odour. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey No significant negative effects have been identified in the medium to work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water long term. There is likely to be some adverse effect to the landscape drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the during construction but the medium to long term effects are likely to planning applications for the site. improve and enhance the existing provision. Earl Shilton: Option 2 Earl Shilton: Option 3 The Earl Shilton SUE Option 2 removes the Waste Water Treatment The retention of Earl Shilton will mean that there will be little change Works (WWTW) on the site, which means approximately 46 ha of in many of the current impacts upon sustainability. However, the lack land can be developed providing c.1600 homes. The SUE is to of development in Earl Shilton will mean that the provision of any new provide an exemplar of sustainable design and provide a catalyst for services, facilities, homes or jobs and the associated improvement the regeneration of the existing settlement. The removal of the and enhancement works will not take place. The regeneration of the WWTW on site increases the amount of developable land available area will be difficult to achieve and the quality of life for residents is and the restrictions to the type of neighbouring development that can unlikely to improve. occur. This option provides approximately 7Ha. less Natural and Semi-Natural Green Space than Option 1 but an increase in Open Space provision. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the planning applications for the site.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 43 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
medium to long term effects are likely to improve and enhance the existing provision.
Earl Shilton: Option 4 (Preferred Option) The Earl Shilton SUE Option 4 (the Preferred Option) combines elements of Option 1 and Option 2. The Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW) is retained on the site, which means approximately 40 ha of land can be developed, however it is proposed that 1600 dwellings are to be delivered. A higher density of development will therefore be required, which will be determined a the planning application stage. The SUE is to provide an exemplar of sustainable design and provide a catalyst for the regeneration of the existing settlement. The retention of the WWTW on site restricts the amount of developable land available. The WWTW also provides restrictions in the type of neighbouring development that can occur and may provide issues in relation to odour, a 100m buffer is proposed around the WWTW to address these issues. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the planning applications for the site. The County Council’s Resources Map indicates the potential presence of pockets of glacial sand and gravel deposits within both sites. Further detailed assessments will be required at the planning application stage. The majority of impacts are positive, although are unlikely to be realised in the short term until the development is complete. Some negative impacts may occur in the short term during construction. Specific mitigation measures will be need to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Design and Access Statement that should accompany any planning application. In general, uncertain results relate to impacts where further work will be required at the detailed stage. The impact on noise is not specifically identified in the SA Framework but is acknowledged in the Implementation Plan of the AAP and should be considered as part of any planning application in relation to transport and construction impacts. No significant negative effects have been identified in the medium to long term. There is likely to be some adverse effect to the landscape during construction but the
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 44 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Barwell: Option 1 (Preferred Option) Barwell: Option 2 The Barwell SUE Option proposes the development of c.2500 homes. The retention of Barwell will mean that there will be little change in The SUE is to provide an exemplar of sustainable design and provide many of the current impacts upon sustainability. However, the lack of a catalyst for the regeneration of the existing settlement. The Council development in Barwell will mean that the provision of any new will expect compliance with Core Strategy Policy 16 on Housing services, facilities, homes or jobs and the associated improvement Density, Mix and Design and Policy 15 on Affordable Housing, which and enhancement works will not take place. The regeneration of the requires 20% on-site provision of affordable housing. area will be difficult to achieve and the quality of life for residents is unlikely to improve. This option proposes approximately 9.6 Ha. of outdoor sports provision and Accessible Natural and Semi-Natural Green Space will be provided throughout the SUE. The SUE contains the Little Fields Meadow local wildlife site, which will be retained. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that further survey work will be required. Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water drainage assessments and strategies will need to accompany the planning applications for the site. The large public open space immediately adjacent to the Barwell urban extension is a restored landfill. An assessment will be needed to establish if there are any contaminants that may have implications for neighbouring uses. The County Council’s Resources Map indicates the potential presence of pockets of glacial sand and gravel deposits within both sites. Further detailed assessments will be required at the planning application stage. The majority of impacts are positive, although are unlikely to be realised in the short term until the development is complete. Some negative impacts may occur in the short term during construction. Specific mitigation measures will be need to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Design and Access Statement that should accompany any planning application.
The impact upon waste and recycling is uncertain as no details are provided on how this will be addressed. The impact on noise is not identified in the SA Framework and should be considered as part of any planning application in relation to transport and construction impacts. No significant negative effects have been identified in the medium to long term. There is likely to be some adverse effect to the landscape during construction but the medium to long term effects are likely to improve and enhance the existing provision.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 45 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
8.3 Significant Sustainability Effects of the Policies
Sustainability Area Action Plan - Policies Objectives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SO6 SO7 SO8 SO9 SO10 SO11 SO12 SO13 SO14 SO15 SO16 SO17 SO18 SO19 SO20 SO21 SO22 SO23
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 46 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
SO24
Sustainability Area Action Plan - Policies Objectives 21 22 23 24 25 26 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SO6 SO7 SO8 SO9 SO10 SO11 SO12 SO13 SO14 SO15 SO16 SO17 SO18 SO19 SO20 SO21 SO22 SO23
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 47 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
SO24
The above table provides a summary of the significant impacts of the policies of the AAP. The SA has assessed the proposed policies for SO15 To minimise energy use and develop renewable energy the AAP against the SA framework. The number of policies has been resources reduced from 34 in the preferred options to 26 in the submission SO16 To reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the rate of version, to remove duplication of issues that are addressed in the climate change. Core Strategy (Local Plan) and forthcoming Site Allocations and Development Management policies. A summary of the results is Short term negative impacts are also considered likely with regards to provided below. The full details can be found in Appendix 7 . Details energy efficiency and carbon emissions, however, compliance with of the policy changes made since the last Consultation Draft AAP can Core Strategy Policy 24: Sustainable Design and Technology should be found in Appendix A9. ensure a positive impact in the medium to long term. Positive Impacts Uncertain Impacts The majority of the impacts of the policies are positive. Uncertain impacts are identified for the following objectives: SO3 To provide better opportunities for local people and tourists to Negative Impacts access and understand local heritage Minor negative impacts are identified in the short term for: SO6 To promote and support the empowerment of local SO7 To protect and enhance the natural environment (species and communities in creating and implementing solutions that meet habitats) whilst contributing to the achievement of Biodiversity their needs focusing particularly on young, elderly and Action Plan targets. deprived people The SUEs develop green field land in areas of mature landscape and SO7 To protect and enhance the natural environment (species and development is therefore likely to have a negative impact in the short habitats) whilst contributing to the achievement of Biodiversity term. Mitigation measures in terms of new open space, biodiversity Action Plan targets. protection and enhancement should result in a positive impact in the SO12 To manage prudently water resources, improve water quality medium to long term. and protect the floodplain. SO13 To improve air quality particularly through reducing transport SO13 To improve air quality particularly through reducing transport related pollutants related pollutants The development is likely to have a minor negative impact on air SO14 To manage prudently mineral resources and avoid / reduce pollution of land. quality in the short term during construction. Detailed traffic modelling of the proposed development will be needed and the identification of SO20 To optimise the use of previously developed land, buildings suitable mitigation measures. and existing infrastructure The uncertainty should be removed as a result of further work and information that will be required with the detailed planning
applications and Environmental Impact Assessment and the identification of appropriate mitigation.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 48 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
8.4 Proposed mitigation measures
Mineral Resources and Pollution of land Mitigation measures have been identified as necessary in relation to The County Council’s Resources Map indicates the potential the following issues: presence of pockets of glacial sand and gravel deposits within both Open Space and Biodiversity sites. Further detailed assessments will be required at the planning Mitigation is proposed through the provision of appropriate open application stage. The large public open space immediately adjacent space; accessible natural green space; a green infrastructure to the Barwell urban extension is a restored landfill. An assessment network; biodiversity enhancement; and the retention of the mature will be needed to establish if there are any contaminants that may landscape framework. Phase 1 habitat surveys have identified that have implications for neighbouring uses. further survey work will be required. The Little Fields Meadow local Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions wildlife site in the Barwell SUE will be retained. Development will be Development will need to provide an exemplar of sustainable design required to comply with Core Strategy Policies 19 on Green space and comply with Core Strategy Policy 24: Sustainable Design and and 20 on Green infrastructure, as well as AAP Policy 25, which Technology. Residential development will need to meet a minimum safeguards open space, sport and recreational facilities. of Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4 from 2013-16 and Level 6 Water Resources, Water Quality and Floodplain from 2016. Schools and Offices will need to meet BREEAM ‘very Detailed flood risk modelling and surface water drainage good’ to 2016 and ‘excellent’ from 2016. Reinforcement of the assessments and strategies will need to accompany the planning electricity distribution system will be needed. applications for the site. Sustainable Drainage systems should be Education and training incorporated and an appropriate Sustainable Drainage Scheme Two new primary schools will be provided in accordance with Policy 2 approved by the Local Authority. Reinforcement of the Avon-Soar of the Core Strategy. Equipped Children’s play space and casual Link water main and new water distribution mains will be needed. informal play space will also be provided in accordance with Policy 19 Reinforcement of the sewerage system and water treatment works of the Core Strategy. Nursery provision may also be needed. will also be needed. Provisional need for Upper and Secondary Schools pupil spaces has Air Quality been identified. The Council will expect developers to provide New development is likely to cause an increase in air pollution during financial contributions towards enhancing/or increasing capacity at construction and as a result of the increase in traffic. Mitigation is existing secondary and upper education facilities, which are likely to proposed through the improvement of public transport and accommodate the anticipated need. provision/improvement of cycling and pedestrian links between the Employment SUE and the existing settlements. Detailed traffic modelling of the Development is to provide local employment opportunities, including proposed development will be needed and the identification of starter and grow-on units. Areas allocated for employment uses are suitable mitigation measures. Impacts during construction will be predominantly for industrial (B2) and warehousing use (B8) in short term. A 100m buffer of natural green space is to be provided accordance with Core Strategy Policy 2 to prevent competition with around the WWTW in Earl Shilton to mitigate against odour and visual office development in Hinckley town centre. Units should range from intrusion. 100-150m2. Existing employment sites are to be protected in accordance with Policy 23.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 49 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Previously developed land The SUEs comprise green field development but the location enables the existing infrastructure to be utilised and upgraded. The expanded populations of the settlement will help to support the existing centres and encourage their regeneration by attracting new investment. Funding from the development will be sought for infrastructure upgrades and enhancement. Community facilities are to be retained wherever possible or replaced if lost. Waste Management The development is to provide an exemplar of sustainable design and will need to contribute towards additional waste management capacity and or enhancements at the most appropriate recycling and household waste site according to need. Details of sustainable procurement and waste management practices will need to be identified as part of the detailed applications. Public transport, cycling and walking The proposals seek to improve access to the existing centres by public transport, cycling and walking, whilst providing opportunities for the enhancement of existing facilities and services within the settlements, including provision for electric and low emission vehicles. Noise The impact on noise is not identified in the SA Framework but is acknowledged in the Implementation Plan of the AAP and should be considered as part of any planning application in relation to transport and construction impacts. Infrastructure and Delivery Development will need to provide additional or improved infrastructure, amenities or facilities either directly or through the appropriate funding mechanism, unless it can be demonstrated that it is not viable. Specific mitigation measures will be need to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Design and Access Statement that should accompany any planning application.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 50 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
8.5 Cumulative Impacts
The majority of the cumulative impacts are positive, although most will not be realised until the medium to long term once the development is complete.
Minor negative impacts are identified in the short term for SO7, SO13, SO15 and SO16. The SUEs develop green field land in areas of mature landscape and development is therefore likely to have a negative impact in the short term. Mitigation measures in terms of new open space, biodiversity protection and enhancement should result in a positive impact in the medium to long term. The development is likely to have a minor negative impact on air quality in the short term during construction. Detailed traffic modelling of the proposed development, as a whole, will be needed and the identification of suitable mitigation measures. The cumulative impact upon secondary education provision will also need to be considered as a joint requirement for both settlements, although it is anticipated that the need can be accommodated. Short term negative impacts are also considered likely with regards to energy efficiency and carbon emissions, however, compliance with Core Strategy Policy 24: Sustainable Design and Technology should ensure a positive impact in the medium to long term. Uncertain impacts are identified for SO3, SO6, SO12, SO13, SO14, and SO20. The uncertainty should be removed as a result of further work and information that will be required with the detailed planning applications, Environmental Impact Assessments and the identification of appropriate mitigation.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 51 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
9.0 Implementation
9.1 What are the next steps? 9.3 Proposals for monitoring Following consultation on the Draft Submission AAP and SA Report, The plan should be monitored regularly to check that the policies are any amendments that are considered necessary will be made to the achieving the desired results and to accommodate any changes in AAP in response to representations received. If significant circumstances. The indicators set out in the Sustainability Appraisal amendments are made it may be necessary to subject those changes Framework should be incorporated into the Annual Monitoring Report to a further SA. The AAP will then be submitted to the Secretary of (AMR). The AMR will monitor the type of development occurring in State for review by a Planning Inspector. the Borough and the impact that the Council’s planning policies are having upon sustainable development. If the AMR identifies any changes that should be made to the policies, such changes will be 9.2 How the plan will be implemented reviewed and a further SA undertaken if it is considered necessary.
The Council has set out the requirements of the urban extensions of Earl Shilton and Barwell in the Area Action Plan. The requirements are both specific to each urban extension (in Sections 5 and 6) and joint requirements (Section 4). The Council considers, in line with Policies 2 and 3 of the Core Strategy (Local Plan), that the best way in which these requirements can be satisfied is for a single outline planning application to be made for each urban extension. Such outline applications will need coordination in order to be able to meet the “joint” requirements covering both Earl Shilton and Barwell. For example, detailed Transport Assessments at the planning application stage will need to consider the impact of growth in both Earl Shilton and Barwell over the plan period. Furthermore, the cumulative impact of both SUEs on secondary and upper education facilities that service both settlements will also need to be considered as a joint requirement.
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 52 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
10 Conclusions
10.1 Conclusions and Recommendations
During the assessment it was noticed that a specific policy on waste This document provides a Sustainability Appraisal (SA) of the management had not been identified. Policy 5 has now been added Submission Draft Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan (AAP). to the AAP to address this issue. Whilst the policy now establishes The AAP will support the Core Strategy (Local Plan) and provides the detailed planning guidance for development in the areas of Earl the need to contribute to waste management capacity and/or Shilton and Barwell for the period up to 2026. enhancements, the policy could be strengthened by identifying other waste management practices that could have additional benefits The Draft Submission Version AAP has been amended to take into through the selection and procurement of sustainable or recycled consideration the consultation responses to the Preferred Options materials and best practice methods in sustainable construction. and additional evidence for the masterplans, in particular, the The assessment also identified that a specific policy on Open Space Strategic Transport Assessment, the infrastructure requirements and the Viability Assessment. A further Sustainability Appraisal (this provision was not included in the AAP, however, the need to meet the document) has therefore been undertaken to ensure that the new open space and green infrastructure requirements are part of the evidence is fully considered in the assessment. development frameworks for the SUEs and Core Strategy Policy 19. Policy 25 has since been added to Safeguard Open Space, Sport and The SA has assessed the same five options that were identified at the Recreational Facilities to strengthen the protection of these areas. Preferred Options stage to ensure that the new evidence has not Specific mitigation measures will need to be submitted as part of the changed the sustainability outcomes, in addition to the final preferred proposals. option for Earl Shilton, which is a combination of Options 1 and 2. The SA identified that the impact on noise is not included within the The detailed results of the options appraisal are set out in Section 8 of SA Framework. However, noise is acknowledged in the this report and Appendix A6 . Implementation Plan of the AAP and should be considered as part of The results of the SA show that the AAP performs well and that the any planning application in relation to transport and construction majority of the impacts are positive, although are unlikely to be impacts. realised in the short term until the development is complete. Some The majority of the cumulative impacts are positive, although most will negative impacts may occur in the short term during construction. In not be realised until the medium to long term once the development is general, uncertain results relate to impacts where further work will be complete. Detailed traffic modelling of the proposed development, as required at the detailed stage. Specific mitigation measures will need a whole, will be needed and the identification of suitable mitigation to be identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment and Design measures. The cumulative impact upon secondary education and Access Statement that should accompany any planning provision will also need to be considered as a joint requirement for application. both settlements, although it is anticipated that the need can be accommodated. Should any further amendments be made to the Draft Submission AAP as a consequence of the consultation, the amendments will be reviewed and a further SA undertaken if considered necessary. Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 53 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013
Draft Submission Sustainability Appraisal: 54 jam consult ltd Earl Shilton and Barwell Area Action Plan July 2013