Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 www.elsevier.com/locate/jafrearsci
The tectonostratigraphy, granitoid geochronology and geological evolution of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia B. Yibas a, W.U. Reimold a,*, R. Armstrong b, C. Koeberl c, C.R. Anhaeusser a,d, D. Phillips b a Impact Cratering Research Group, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg 2001, South Africa b Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia c Institute of Geochemistry, University of Vienna, Althan Str. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria d Economic Geology Research Institute, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg 2001, South Africa Received 7 July 2000; accepted 1 June 2001
Abstract Two distinct tectonostratigraphic terranes, separated by repeatedly reactivated deformation zones, are recognised in the Pre- cambrian of southern Ethiopia: (1) granite-gneiss terrane, which is classified into sub-terranes and complexes, and (2) ophiolitic fold and thrust belts. The granite-gneiss terrane consists of para- and orthoquartzofeldspathic gneisses and granitoids, intercalated with amphibolites and sillimanite–kyanite-bearing schists. The paragneisses resemble gneisses from northern Kenya that were derived from sediments that filled the Kenyan sector of the ‘‘Mozambique Belt basin’’ between 1200 and 820 Ma. The volume of sediments formed during this period is comparatively small in southern Ethiopia, implying that the ‘‘Mozambique Belt basin’’ became pro- gressively narrower northwards. The granitoid rocks in the study area vary from granitic gneisses to undeformed granites and range compositionally from diorites to granites. The granitoid gneisses form an integral part of the granite-gneiss terrane, but are rare in the ophiolitic fold and thrust belts. The ophiolitic fold and thrust belts are composed of mafic, ultramafic and metasedimentary rocks in various proportions. Undeformed granitoids are also developed in these belts. Eight granitoids from southern Ethiopia have been dated by U–Pb single zircon SHRIMP and laser probe 40Ar–39Ar dating. The SHRIMP ages range from 880 to 526 Ma, and are interpreted as close approximations of the respective magmatic emplacement ages. The 40Ar–39Ar data range from 550 to 500 Ma. The available geochronological data and field studies allowed classification of the granitoids of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia into seven generations: Gt1 (>880 Ma); Gt2 (800–770 Ma); Gt3 (770–720 Ma); Gt4 (720–700 Ma); Gt5 (700–600 Ma); Gt6 (580–550 Ma); and Gt7 (550–500 Ma). The period 550–500 Ma (Gt7) is marked by emplacement of late- to post-tectonic and post-orogenic granitoids and presumably represents the latest tectonothermal event marking the end of the East African Orogen. Five tectonothermal events belonging to the East African Orogen are recognised in the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia: (1) Adola (1157 2 to 1030 40 Ma); (2) Bulbul–Awata ( 876 5 Ma); (3) Megado (800–750 Ma); (4) Moyale (700–550 Ma); and (5) Berguda (550–500 Ma). Ó 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Southern Ethiopia; Geological evolution
1. Introduction relationship between the roughly contemporaneous high-grade metamorphic Mozambique Belt and the low- The Precambrian of southern Ethiopia occupies an grade Arabian–Nubian Shield in northeast Africa is still important position within the Pan-African Mozambique a subject of debate (e.g., Key et al., 1989). Belt and the Arabian–Nubian Shield, which, together, In the Kenyan part of the East African Orogen, form the East African Orogen (Stern, 1994) (Fig. 1). The useful contributions have resulted from mapping in western (Vearncombe, 1983) and north-central (Key * Corresponding author. Tel.: +27-11-716-2946; fax: +27-11-339- et al., 1989) Kenya. Investigations aimed at understand- 1697. ing the geology of selected areas in southern Ethiopia E-mail address: [email protected] (W.U. Reimold). have also been reported (e.g., Lebling, 1940; Jelenc, 1966;
0899-5362/02/$ - see front matter Ó 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S0899-5362(01)00099-9 58 B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84
Fig. 1. Geological map of northeastern Africa, modified after Worku and Schandelmeier (1996) and Shackleton (1997), showing the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia within the confines of the East African Orogen.
Gilboy, 1970; Chater, 1971; Kazmin, 1971, 1972; Kaz- pian Precambrian terranes, in general, and for southern min et al., 1978; Kozyrev et al., 1985; Map of Adola Ethiopia, in particular, are very limited (Table 1). In the Belt, 1990; Gichile, 1991; Woldehaimanot, 1995; Worku 1990s, however, geochronological data have slowly and Schandelmeier, 1996). Asystematic study for the emerged (Ayalew et al., 1990; Alemu, 1997; Tadesse Precambrian geology of the southern Ethiopian region et al., 1997, 2000; Worku, 1996; Mechessa, 1996; Teklay has been provided recently by Yibas (2000). et al., 1998) (Table 1). Although these geochronologi- Although the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia oc- cal data for the study area are, to some extent, useful cupies an important position within the East African in shedding light on the timing of magmatic activity, Orogen (Fig. 1), geochronological data for the Ethio- they still fall short of providing a comprehensive Table 1 Available geochronological data for Precambrian rocks of southern Ethiopia Lithotectonic terrane Complex Locality Rock type Mi.–WR Age (Ma) Reference Gneiss–granitoid Moyale–Sololo Complex El Der Hornblende–biotite gneiss Bi (K–Ar) 749 15 Rogers et al. (1965) terrane Genale–Dolo Complex Negele Biotite gneiss Bi (K–Ar) 516 5 Rogers et al. (1965) Zembaba village Porphyritic granite (ET9) Zr (Pb–Pb) 752 6 Teklay et al. (1998) 57–84 (2002) 34 Sciences Earth African of Journal / al. et Yibas B. Zembaba village Metarhyolite (ET10) Zr (Pb–Pb) 605 7 Teklay et al. (1998) Alge,a west of the Bulbul Belt Mylonitic tonalite (Alge Gneiss of Zr (Pb–Pb) 557 9 Teklay et al. (1998) Kazmin, 1972) 35 km SW Negele (Bulbul) Porphyritic granodiorite gneiss Zr (Pb–Pb) 884 7 Teklay et al. (1998) Adola Complex Mormora River Granite Bi (K–Ar) 504 20 Jelenc (1966) Burjiji Granite Zr (U–Pb) 612 6 Worku (1996) Gariboro Pegmatite Ms (Rb–Sr) 530 10 Gilboy (1970) Granite WR (Rb–Sr) 680 Gilboy (1970) Granite WR (Rb–Sr) 515 10 Gilboy (1970) Granite Zr (U–Pb) 646 30 Worku (1996) Lega Dima Granite Zr (U–Pb) 550 18 Worku (1996) Robele Granite Zr (U–Pb) 554 13 Abraham et al. (1992) Alghea (west of Digati) Alghe granite gneiss Zr (U–Pb) 722 2 Worku (1996) Sebeto Tonalite gneiss Zr (U–Pb) 765 3 Abraham et al. (1992) Burji–Finchaa Complex Yabello town Yabello granite gneiss Zr (Pb–Pb) 716 8 Teklay et al. (1998) Agere Mariam Foliated granite Zr (U–Pb) 708 3 Abraham et al. (1992) Near Agere Mariam Berguda granite Zr (U–Pb) 529 11 Abraham et al. (1992) Konso, west of Burji– Konso granulite Zr (Pb–Pb) 720 7 Teklay et al. (1998) Finchaa Complex
Ophiolitic fold and Megado Belt Megado Megado metabasic rocks WR (Sm–Nd) 789 36 Worku (1996) thrust belts Moyale–El Kur Belt Moyale Quartz diorite Bi (K–Ar) 526 5 Rogers et al. (1965) Moyale Meta-trondhjemite Zr (Pb–Pb) 658 8 Teklay et al. (1998) El Der Amphibolite WR (K–Ar) 647 20 Rogers et al. (1965) Moyale Amphibolite Zr (U–Pb) 700 10 Teklay et al. (1998) WR ¼ whole rock, Bi ¼ biotite, Zr ¼ zircon, Ms ¼ muscovite. a Note that Alghe and Alge are two different localities, the former located in the western margin of the Megado Belt near Digati village, and the latter in the westernmost part of the Genale–Dolo complex, west of the Bulbul Belt. 59 60 B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 understanding of the evolution of the Precambrian ter- complexes are represented in the study area. Although rane of southern Ethiopia. This is primarily due to the this classification is still in use, its validity is diminishing lack of systematic geological and structural work in this in the light of newly emerging geological and, especially, region, which has severely constrained the use of geo- geochronological data (e.g., Ayalew et al., 1990; Teklay chronological data in interpreting the geological evolu- et al., 1998; Worku, 1996; Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., tion. 2000a,b). In this paper, a new map depicting the Precambrian The geological map of the study area, which occupies geology of southern Ethiopia is presented together with an area of over 88 000 km2, is shown in Fig. 2. Approxi- SHRIMP and laser probe 40Ar–39Ar geochronological mately 60% of the area shown was mapped recently by data for selected granitoids of the study area. These new Yibas (2000). The previous work of Genzebu et al. results complement the existing chronological data, and, (1994), Gobena et al. (1997), Kozyrev et al. (1985), the together with the systematic geological mapping of the geological map of the Bulbul area (Geological map of area (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000a), make a signifi- Bulbul area, 1988), the geological maps of the Moyale cant contribution to deciphering the tectonic evolution (EIGS, 1997) and Sololo (EIGS, 1997) areas and TM of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia. The implica- Landsat images were also used to compile the geological tions with regard to the relationship of this region to the and structural database for southern Ethiopia (Yibas, Mozambique Belt, the Arabian–Nubian Shield and the 2000). East African Orogen are discussed. A new tectonostrati- The Precambrian geology of Ethiopia consists of two graphic classification for the study area is provided. distinct lithotectonic terranes which show contrasting lithological association, internal structures and grade of metamorphism (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000a): (1) the 2. Geology and tectonostratigraphy granite-gneiss terrane, consisting of high-grade para- and orthogneisses and deformed and metamorphosed The Precambrian terrane of southern Ethiopia is granitoids; and (2) the ophiolitic fold and thrust belts, overlain to the west by Cainozoic volcanics and sedi- consisting of low-grade, mafic–ultramafic and sedimen- ments associated with the Main Ethiopian Rift System tary assemblages. Major fault and/or shear zones dis- (Figs. 2 and 3). The Precambrian rocks comprise high- playing multiple deformation features (Yibas, 2000) grade ortho- and paragneisses and migmatites, low- separate these two terrane types. grade volcanosedimentary–ultramafic assemblages and The bulk of the granite-gneiss terrane is underlain by granitoids of variable composition. Lebling (1940) was para- and orthoquartzofeldspathic gneisses, intercalated among the earliest workers, who broadly classified the with amphibolites, sillimanite–kyanite-bearing schist geology of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia into and marbles, and granitoids, and extends into northern gneissic, granitoid and ‘‘green’’ rock terranes and pro- Kenya. Lithologically, the paragneisses resemble the vided the first lithological descriptions. This was fol- gneisses of northern Kenya (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., lowed by the classification of Jelenc (1966) for the Adola 2000a). rocks into the Gariboro Series (granitic and psammitic gneisses) and the Adola Series (basic and pelitic rocks). 2.1. Granite-gneiss terrane Kazmin (1972) and Kazmin et al. (1978) (Table 2) classified the Precambrian rocks of Ethiopia into Upper, The granite-gneiss lithotectonic terrane has been Middle and Lower Complexes, following the threefold subdivided into two sub-terranes (Burji–Moyale, Adola– classification of Gilboy (1970) and Chater (1971) for the Genale), and four complexes (Burji–Finchaa, Moy- Adola rocks. According to this classification, the Lower ale–Sololo, Adola and Genale), based on the spatial Complex, consisting of relatively high-grade gneisses, associations of the rocks, internal structures, interrela- represents the older (presumably Archaean) cratonic tionships of the various rock types and lithostructural basement, upon which the Middle Complex (Lower to similarity (Figs. 2 and 3; Table 3). Middle Proterozoic, platform cover of clastic sediments) The NW–SE trending Geleba–Chelanko Shear–Fault was deposited. The Upper (Neoproterozoic) Complex Zone (Figs. 2 and 3) separates the Burji–Moyale and consists of low-grade volcanosedimentary assemblages the Adola–Genale sub-terranes and has also acted as the of ophiolitic affinity (Kazmin et al., 1978). All three locus of subsequent granitic magmatic activity (e.g., the
Fig. 2. Geological map of southern Ethiopia (scale 1:1 000 000), refer to maps attached with this issue. B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 61
Fig. 3. Tectonostratigraphic map of the Precambrian geology of southern Ethiopia with sample location for dated rocks (modified from Yibas, 2000): 1 ¼ Metoarbasebat granite; 2 ¼ Meleka granodiorite; 3 ¼ Digati diorite gneiss; 4 ¼ Wadera megacrystic diorite gneiss; 5 ¼ Wadera deformed granite dyke; 6 ¼ Moyale granodiorite; 7 ¼ Melka Guba megacrystic diorite gneiss; 8 ¼ Bulbul mylonitic diorite gneiss.
Arero granitic complex and the Altuntu megacrystic have ages between 725 and 708 Ma (Gichile, 1991; granite were intruded along its extent). Teklay et al., 1998). The most important lithologic units in the Burji– The granitoids in the Burji–Finchaa complex are Finchaa granite-gneiss complex are the Burji gneiss, the predominantly high-K granites, with minor shoshonitic Bari Dome gneisses, the Finchaa quartzofeldspathic peralkaline granites, tonalites, trondhjemites and gran- gneisses and the Yabello, Altuntu, Finchaa and Soyoma odiorites (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000d). The Moyale– granitoid gneisses (Fig. 2). With the exception of the Sololo granite-gneiss complex is composed mainly of Berguda granitoid complex, which has an age of circa granitic and granodioritic gneisses and subordinate par- 530 Ma, the other granitoids so far dated in this complex agneisses (biotite gneiss, mylonitic quartzofeldspathic 62
Table 2 Stratigraphy of the Precambrian geology of Ethiopia (after Kazmin, 1972; Kazmin et al., 1978) Era Age (Ma) Southern Ethiopia Western Ethiopia Northern Ethiopia Eastern Ethiopia Complex .Ybse l ora fArcnErhSine 4(02 57–84 (2002) 34 Sciences Earth African of Journal / al. et Yibas B. Group Units Group Formation Eocambrian 500 Matheos Formation Upper Shiraro Formation Dadikama Forma- tion Neoproterozoic 700 Tambien Group Amota Formation Mai Kenetal Forma- tion Arequa Formation 1000 Mormora Group Birbir Group Tsaliet Group Soka and Boje Series and Kajimiti Beds 1600 Adola Group Greenstones and amphibolites Palaeo- to Mes- Wadera Group Middle oproterozoic Archaean 2500 Burji gneiss Gneisses undiffer- Gneisses undifferen- Mica schists Lower entiated tiated Arero Group Yavello gneiss Gneisses undifferentiated Awata gneiss Alghe gneiss ? ? Beles granulites Konso gneiss Table 3 Tectonostratigraphy of the granite-gneiss complexes of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia (compare Yibas, 2000) Era/epoch Major geologic activity Age (Ma) Burji–Moyale sub-terrane Adola–Genale sub-terrane Burji–Finchaa granite- Moyale–Sololo granite- Adola gneiss–granitoid Genale–Dolo granite- gneiss complex gneiss complex complex gneiss complex Early Cambrian Post-tectonic to post- 550–500 Berguda charnockitic Metoarbasebat granite e.g., Robele granite orogenic magmatism granite (528 8:4to (526 5Ma) (554 23 Ma); Lega 538 3Ma) Dima granite (550 8 Ma) Late-Neoproterozoic Arc- and collisional 650–570 Meleka foliated granodi- Wadera megacrystic di- granitic magmatism orite (610 9); Gari- orite gneiss (579 5 57–84 (2002) Ma); 34 Sciences Earth African of Journal / al. et Yibas B. boro–Burjiji granitic Wadera foliated granitic massif (646–602 Ma) dyke (576 5Ma) Early–Middle Neoprote- Granitic magmatism as- 700–900 Soyoma charnockitic Mount Garara mylonitic Wadera mylonites and Mylonitic quartzofelds- rozoic sociated with the opening granite gneiss granite gneiss gneisses pathic gneisses and closure of marginal Finchaa biotite granite Raro–Kakissa–El Gof Alghe granite gneiss Zembaba granite gneiss basins (708 5 Ma); Yabello magnetite-bearing quar- (722 2Ma) (756 6 Ma); Melka charnockitic granite gne- tzofeldspathic gneiss and Guba megacrystic diorite iss (716 5 Ma); Sagan granite gneisses, diop- gneiss (778 23 Ma) basic charnockites side-bearing gneiss; Sod- (725 3 Ma); Altuntu igga granite gneisses, megacrystic granite gne- mylonitic quartzofelds- iss; Sebeto tonalite gneiss pathic gneisses, migmat- (765 3Ma) itic gneisses, and charnockitic granite Awata granitoid and Bulbul–Alge granitoid migmatitic assemblage and migmatitic assem- blage
Late Mesoproterozoic Sedimentation in the 1050 Paragneisses with subor- Roukka quartzofelds- Kenticha Formation: Hornblende–biotite gne- ‘‘Mozambique Belt dinate foliated granites pathic gneisses, biotite– biotite–quartz–feldspar iss, with interbeds of basin’’ hornblende gneisses, gneiss, garnet staurolite amphibole schist minor quartzofeldspathic gneiss and amphibolite schists Finchaa gneiss; Bari Mega–Hidilola biotite– Aflata Formation Genale Formation Dome gneisses amphibole gneisses, intercalated with am- phibolites Burji gneisses Sololo quartzofelds- Arero gneisses; Zembaba Quartzofeldspathic pathic gneisses Formation gneisses and associated schists Palaeo- to Mesoprotero- Pre-Pan-African Crust 1250–2050 Inferred from ages of zoic zircon xenocrysts (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000a,b, 2000c, 2000d) 63 64 B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 gneiss, and muscovite–quartz–feldspar gneiss; Fig. 2). Aflata Formation (e.g., the 765 3 Ma Sebeto tonalite Geochemical studies of the complex confirm the domi- and the 722 2 Ma Alghe granite gneiss) are subduc- nance of orthogneisses ranging from monzonitic to tion-related granitoids (Gichile, 1991; Worku, 1996; monzodioritic granitoids of both volcanic-arc and Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000d). The major rock units within-plate tectonic affinity (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., in the Kenticha Formation are pelitic gneisses and 2000d). Lithologic similarity between the biotite–horn- mica schists, with minor occurrences of amphibolites, blende gneisses in the western part of the Moyale–Sololo marbles and graphite schists. granite-gneiss complex and the Burji gneisses in the The Genale–Dolo granite-gneiss complex forms the north suggests that these gneisses might belong to the largest segment of what was previously known as the same facies. However, continuity cannot be proven, as Alghe gneiss. Kazmin (1972, 1975) described these rocks the area between these two gneisses is covered by Cai- as uniform biotite- and biotite–amphibole gneisses nozoic volcanic rocks (Figs. 2 and 3). The Moyale– grading into banded migmatites and grey granodioritic Sololo paragneisses also extend southwards into Kenya rocks (Kazmin also regarded these gneisses as part of (Key et al., 1989). the oldest, Archaean rock sequences in Ethiopia). The The southwestern part of the Adola–Genale granite- paragneisses in the Genale–Dolo granite-gneiss com- gneiss sub-terrane is dominated by the Bulbul–Awata plex, in the northeastern as well as in the central and granitoid–migmatitic assemblage, which is subdivided western regions of the study area, can be classified into into the Awata and Bulbul–Alge migmatitic–granitoid three major assemblages, which are intruded by different gneisses (Fig. 2). In the Alge area and to the west of the phases of orthogneisses. However, the mylonitic gneisses Bulbul Belt these rocks are represented by strongly de- that are widely developed throughout the complex are formed granitoids. interpreted as the result of the Wadera shearing event at Although significant amounts of paragneisses and about 580 Ma (cf. below; Yibas et al., 2000a,b). The schists occur in the Adola granite-gneiss complex, or- Bulbul–Alge granitoid–migmatitic gneisses form part of thogneisses are dominant (Woldehaimanot, 1995; the Bulbul–Awata granitoid–migmatite assemblage. Worku, 1996; Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000b). Kozyrev Minor basic intrusives result in positive topographic et al. (1985) classified the Adola gneisses into five for- features in the northeastern part of the study area (the mations––the Zembaba, Aflata, Kenticha, Buluka and largest occurrence is the circular dome of Mount Ka- Bore Formations. Yibas (2000) and Yibas et al. (2000a), lido; Gobena et al., 1997). however, argued that both the Buluka and Bore for- The equilibrium paragenesis commonly observed in mations are dominated by granitoid gneisses and the gneissic rocks of southern Ethiopia is representative migmatitic gneisses, which are similar to the Awata of the medium-temperature part of the amphibolite fa- granitoids and migmatitic gneisses, and, hence, mapped cies, although evidence of prograde metamorphism to- these units together as the Awata–Bulbul granitoid– wards the higher-temperature part of the amphibolite migmatitic assemblage. The Zembaba Formation, which facies can be observed locally (e.g., Chater, 1971; forms the eastern part of the Adola Complex, is the Worku, 1996; Yibas, 2000). lowest stratigraphic unit in this complex. It consists mainly of quartzofeldspathic gneisses, with a minor 2.2. Ophiolitic fold and thrust belts amount of leucocratic biotite gneiss, that are interca- lated with biotite–muscovite schists. Four mafic–ultramafic–sedimentary assemblages (each Kazmin (1972), Kazmin et al. (1978) and Kozyrev composed of varying proportions of mafic, ultramafic et al. (1985) regarded most of these rocks as parag- and sedimentary rocks) are recognised in the Precam- neisses, but Worku (1996) emphasised the presence brian of southern Ethiopia (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., of a significant proportion of gneisses derived from 2000c, and references therein). These are the (1) Bulbul; anorogenic granites in addition to paragneisses––an (2) Kenticha; (3) Megado; and (4) Moyale–El Kur belts observation that was supported by Yibas (2000). In the (Figs. 2 and 3; Table 4). The mafic rocks that form the south-central part of the Adola Complex, in the vicinity bulk of these assemblages are dominantly sub-alkaline, of Arero village, the Zembaba gneisses appear to be low-Ti tholeiites and boninites (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., paragneisses, as they display prominent compositional 2000c). The mafic–ultramafic–sedimentary assemblages and grain size variation. The Aflata Formation crops can be referred to as fold and thrust belts in view of their out in the western and central parts of the Adola deformational styles and as ophiolites in as far as their Complex. The textural and compositional variations origin and lithological associations are concerned (Yi- may suggest heterogeneity of the protoliths of the rocks bas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000c). of this formation. The rocks mapped as Aflata Forma- The contacts of the ophiolitic fold and thrust belts tion by Kozyrev et al. (1985) were earlier regarded by with the adjacent granite-gneiss complexes are re- Kazmin (1972, 1975) as Archaean in age (Table 2). activated deformation zones, where evidence of both However, most of the granitoids mapped as part of the thrusting and strike-slip faulting could be found (Figs. 2 B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 65
Table 4 Correlation of the main lithologies in the ophiolitic fold and thrust belts of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia Megado Belt Kenticha Belt Bulbul Belt Moyale–El Kur Belt Moyale sub-belt Jimma–El Kur sub-belt Kajimiti Beds: Conglomer- ates and greywackes Megado metasediments: Kenticha metasediments: Bulbul metasediments: Metasediments interlayered Metasediments interlayered Greywackes, lithic are- Staurolite–sillimanite- Metasandstones, graphites with metabasic rocks and with minor metabasic rocks nites, quartzites and phyl- bearing biotite schists, Fe– and biotite phyllites ultramafic schists: Gra- and meta-ultramafic rocks: lites Mn quartzites, marbles (Kazmin et al., 1978) phitic schists, amphibolite Quartz–feldspar schists, and siliceous metapelites and amphibole gneiss conglomeratic gneiss, kya- nite–sillimanite schist, quartzites and marbles, in- tercalated with minor me- tabasite and ultramafic schists Megado metabasic rocks: Kenticha metabasic rocks: Bulbul metabasic rocks: Metabasic rocks: Amphi- Metabasic rocks: Amphi- Amphibole–chlorite Amphibole–chlorite schists Amphibole–chlorite bole–chlorite schist, am- bole–chlorite schists, am- schists, amphibolites and and amphibolites schists, amphibolites and phibolites and phibolites and subordinate metagabbros metagabbros metagabbros metagabbros Meta-ultramafic rocks: Meta-ultramafic rocks: Meta-ultramafic rocks:N– Meta-ultramafic rocks: Meta-ultramafic rocks: Serpentinites, talc schists Talc–tremolite schists, S elongated lenticular Serpentinites, talc–tremo- Serpentinites, talc–tremo- and talc–chlorite–tremolite talc–anthophyllite schists bodies of ultramafic schists lite schist, talc–serpentine lite schist and birbirites schists and talc serpentinite, mi- (mainly composed of talc, rocks with antigorite at the forming the base of the nor chlorite–talc schists, chlorite, tremolite and ac- core, and birbirites (talc– sub-belt chlorite–anthophyllite–ser- tinolite, in various propor- magnetite serpentinite pentine schists; occur in tions) tectonically rocks) two sub-parallel zones: the interlayered with meta- eastern sheared zone and gabbros and with basic the western zone forming schists the base and the upper part of the Kenticha Belt, re- spectively and 3; Yibas, 2000). N–S trending curvilinear shear Metabasic and metasedimentary rocks are dominant zones separate the Kenticha and Megado belts from over ultramafic rocks in the Megado Belt. In contrast, the adjacent granite-gneiss complexes (Woldehaimanot, ultramafic rocks (serpentinite, talc–tremolite and talc– 1995; Worku, 1996; Yibas, 2000). These zones are the anthophyllite schists) are dominant over the mafic rocks Digati–Meleka, Lega Dembi–Aflata, Dermi Dama and in the Kenticha Belt. Staurolite- and sillimanite-bearing Kenticha Shear Zones and represent major thrust faults biotite schists and minor occurrences of Fe–Mn quartz- reactivated by N–S trending, sinistral strike-slip faults. ites, marbles and siliceous metapelites are also recogn- The contacts of the Bulbul rocks with the adjacent high- ised in the Kenticha Belt (Kazmin, 1976; Kazmin et al., grade gneisses to the west are characterised by easterly 1978; Woldehaimanot, 1995; Worku, 1996; Yibas, 2000; dipping, curvilinear, reverse faults, which have been re- Yibas et al., 2000a). The meta-ultramafic rocks in the activated by a strong shearing event (Yibas, 2000). Kenticha Belt comprise two sub-parallel zones of talc Along these faults, sectors of the Bulbul Belt are inter- and talc–serpentine rocks, which are 2–5 km wide and layered with thin zones of mylonitic diorites. The west- extend N–S for at least 60 km (Fig. 2). Sandwiched ern contact of the Moyale–El Kur Belt is characterised between these two ultramafic zones are biotite schists, by curvilinear fault zones (Roukka Fault) that trend epidote–amphibole gneisses and amphibolites. The east- from N–S to NNW–SSE. In most cases, the faults dip ern ultramafic zone is in contact with the metasediments moderately to steeply in easterly direction. The northern of the Kenticha Formation. The westerly dipping con- boundary of this ophiolitic belt with the Moyale–Sololo tact, where exposed, is marked by altered and sheared granite-gneiss is the major, NW–SE trending, dextral El ultrabasic bodies. These rocks may represent the lower Gof–Ketema Fault (Figs. 2 and 3). part of the ultramafic sequence in this zone, consisting The Kenticha and Megado mafic–ultramafic–sedi- of lenticular bodies of serpentinised peridotite enveloped mentary assemblages form two N–S trending lin- by talc–serpentine schist (Kazmin et al., 1978; Wold- ear belts, separated by quartzofeldspathic gneisses and ehaimanot, 1995). Ashear zone dipping steeply to the granitoids of the Adola granite-gneiss complex (Fig. 2). west marks the contact between the eastern ultramafic 66 B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 zone and the basic rocks. The western ultramafic zone, Talc and talc–tremolite schists are the dominant ultra- which may form the upper part of the Kenticha Belt, mafic rocks in the Moyale area, but these rocks are lacks lenticular serpentinised peridotite and is domi- highly altered, and birbirites (talc–magnetite–serpenti- nated by tremolite–talc and chlorite schists. To the west, nite rocks) are common in the area. Good exposures of the ultramafic–mafic zones are in contact with metase- birbirite occur on Toukka Hill of western Moyale and diments (graphitic phyllite and biotite schists, calcareous are characterised by boxworks of silica and magnetite metasandstone; marbles and calc–silicate rocks; Kazmin veinlets. The less altered ultramafic rocks are composed et al., 1978). of serpentine, talc, calcite, dolomite and iron oxides. The The Bulbul Belt occurs in the most easterly part of the most prominent ultramafic body in the area is Mount study area, where the Dawa River (Fig. 2) exposes the Agal Guda, in the eastern part of the Moyale sub-belt eastern contact of the belt with the adjacent biotite- and (Fig. 2). amphibole-bearing gneisses of the Genale–Dolo Com- The ultramafic rocks in the Jimma–El Kur sub-belt plex. Mesozoic sediments overlie most of the eastern are composed of serpentinites, talc–tremolite schists and parts of the Bulbul Belt. The main rock types consti- birbirites, and form positive topography at the west- tuting the Bulbul Belt are mafic rocks with minor ul- ern margin of the sub-belt. These ultramafic rocks are tramafic rocks. In the west, slices of quartzofeldspathic strongly sheared at their base and are in tectonic contact gneisses and dioritic mylonites are tectonically inter- with the mylonitic megacrystic granodiorite to the west. layered with basic rocks. Diorites and plagiogranites The main exposure of this unit occurs around Mount separate the mafic–ultramafic rocks into two zones. The Jeldesa (Fig. 2), where the rocks are brownish to buff in Bulbul Belt might represent a part of a regional, U- colour and form a cryptocrystalline mass with criss- shaped, folded ophiolitic belt, which is believed to ex- crossing magnetite and silica veinlets. Large magnetite tend eastwards into Somalia where it forms the Inda Ad crystals are common throughout this unit. Formation, and possibly separates the Bur and Harar The mafic rocks in these belts comprise amphibole granite-gneiss massifs (Kazmin, 1975). Its existence to schist, amphibole–chlorite schist, massive amphibolite the east has been confirmed by deep drilling in eastern and metagabbro. The amphibole schists and amphibo- Ogaden (Eastern Ethiopia), where some boreholes pen- lites are the dominant lithologies and generally surround, etrated low-grade basement rocks underlying the Me- or are, in places, gradational into, the metagabbros. sozoic sediments (Kazmin, 1975, and references therein). Significant proportions of metasedimentary rocks Yibas (2000) showed that the Moyale Belt is more occur intercalated with the metabasic rocks, particularly extensive than previously reported and extends to the in the Megado Belt where they are mainly represented Jimma–El Kur area in the east––hence the name Moy- by greywackes with subordinate lithic arenites and ale–El Kur fold and thrust belt (Fig. 2). The belt is rare quartz-arenites. Conglomerates and greywackes subdivided into the Moyale and the Jimma–El Kur sub- (Kajimiti Beds) form the upper part of the sedimentary belts, which are separated by a narrow belt of quartzo- sequence. The mineral assemblages in the meta-arkoses, feldspathic gneisses and schist that were deformed by a metapelites and metagreywackes typically comprise shearing event that gave rise to the N–S trending quartz, plagioclase, biotite, muscovite and accessory Roukka Shear Zone (Fig. 2). The Moyale sub-belt rutile, chlorite and epidote (Gilboy, 1970; Chater, 1971; covers the area around the town of Moyale and the Yibas, 1993, 1999). This indicates that the volcanosedi- region close to the border of Ethiopia and Kenya, and mentary rocks did not exceed greenschist facies meta- continues southwards into Kenya (Walsh, 1972; Shagi morphism, in contrast to the dominantly amphibolite et al., 1991). Exposures in the Jimma–El Kur sub-belt and, in places, granulite facies metamorphic grade of (Fig. 2) are scarce, as recent soils largely cover the flat the gneissic rocks and some of the metasediments of the landscape. However, some lenticular outcrops do occur, Kenticha Belt (Yibas, 1999, and references therein). The especially in the central and northern parts of the sub- metasediments in the Moyale sub-belt include graphite– belt, where variable rock types, including conglomer- quartz–mica schists/gneisses, quartz–feldspar schists and atic gneisses, micaceous quartzofeldspathic schists and quartzofeldspathic schists. gneisses, calc–silicate rocks, ultramafic–mafic schists, serpentinites, marbles and quartzites have been mapped (EIGS, 1997; Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000a). In 3. Geochronology the Moyale–El Kur Belt, ultramafic rocks (serpentin- ites, talc–tremolite schist and talc–serpentine rocks) are Several generations of felsic to intermediate intru- found intimately associated with amphibolites. Lenses sives occur in the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia of serpentinite bodies occur within the amphibolite (Fig. 2; Table 3). These granitoids range from gneisses gneiss and the graphitic gneiss/schist in western Moyale. to undeformed granites and vary compositionally from In the core of these lenses, antigorite-bearing rocks give diorites to granites, with the dioritic rocks being less way progressively outwards to talc-dominated schists. abundant. Amore detailed discussion of the composi- B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 67 tions, textures, structures and contact relationships of successive metamorphic event(s) and partial or complete the granitoids with the adjacent lithologies can be found resetting of geochronometers, such as K–Ar, 40Ar–39Ar in Yibas (2000). and Rb–Sr, by younger tectonothermal events. The po- Although granitoid gneisses form an integral part of tential of within-grain analysis for determining the the granite-gneiss terrane, they are absent or rare in the crystallisation history of zircons has been appreciated ophiolitic fold and thrust belts. Afew deformed grani- since the early 1970s. This followed the discovery, from toid rocks do, however, occur in these belts. Notable conventional dating techniques, that old zircon grains among these are the Gayo mylonitic granite, the Digati had preserved their ages through Alpine-age granulite- diorite gneiss and the Geleba diorite in the Megado Belt, facies metamorphism, and that xenocrysts in some the Moyale granodiorite and mylonitic megacrystic granites had survived fusion temperatures (Compston granodiorite in the Moyale–El Kur Belt, and the Bulbul et al., 1992). mylonitic diorite gneiss in the Bulbul Belt. Hybrid The present study aims at establishing a geochrono- granitoids, represented by irregularly intercalated gabb- logical framework for the complex Precambrian terrane roic, dioritic and granodioritic intrusives, form con- of southern Ethiopia, using the SHRIMP dating tech- spicuous hills in the northern part of the Jimma–El Kur nique to determine precise U–Pb ages on single zircons sub-belt (Fig. 2). In the Moyale–El Kur Belt, granitic from selected lithologies. In total, eight samples were and aplitic dykes intrude the mafic–ultramafic rocks. analysed. Towards the west, close to the contact with the Moyale Zircons from the selected samples were separated granodiorite, NE–SW trending granitic dykes, probably using a Wilfley table, a magnetic separator and heavy offshoots of the Moyale granodiorite intrusion, are liquids at the Hugh Allsopp Laboratory, University common. Some of these dykes are strongly brecciated of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Zircon separates and appear to have intruded syn-tectonically along were submitted to the Precise Radiogenic Isotopic Ser- contact zones between the mafic and ultramafic layers. vices (PRISE), at the Research School of Earth Sciences The compositions of some of the granitic dykes show (RSES), Australian National University (ANU), in similarity to the main Moyale granodiorite body to the Canberra. Zircon grains were handpicked under a bin- west (Yibas, 2000; Yibas et al., 2000d). ocular microscope and mounted in epoxy, together with Most of these relatively undeformed granites in the RSES SHRIMP zircon standards AS3 (Duluth southern Ethiopia occur within the granite-gneiss ter- Complex gabbroic anorthosite; Paces and Miller, 1989) rane. Their contact relationships with the country rocks, and SL13. The grains were then sectioned, polished and where exposed, are sharp, steep and truncate the re- photographed. All zircons were further examined by gional, mainly N–S trending, foliation. The size of these SEM cathodoluminescence imaging, a procedure that granitic bodies is variable, but they generally are smaller greatly enhances the quality of data produced in the when compared to the other suites of granites. subsequent ion microprobe sessions. Through cathodo- Four samples from the granitoid gneisses [viz., the luminescence imaging of the zircons, hidden and Bulbul mylonitic diorite gneiss (BY96-78); the Melka complex internal structures can be more accurately de- Guba megacrystic diorite gneiss (BY97-183); the Digati termined than in normal reflected or transmitted light. diorite gneiss (BY96-18); and the Wadera megacry- Consequently, the target area can be more reliably se- stic diorite gneiss (BY97-178)], three samples from the lected for analysis. Using this approach, it was also deformed granitoids [the Moyale granodiorite (BY97- possible to get more information on inheritance, meta- 79); the Meleka metagranodiorite (BY96-13A); and morphic overgrowths and protolith ages. The samples the Wadera foliated granite dyke (BY97-178A)], and were analysed at the RSES using both the SHRIMP I one from an undeformed granitoid [the Metoarbasebat and SHRIMP II instruments. The SHRIMP data have granite (BY96-13A), (Figs. 2 and 3)] were dated using been reduced in a manner similar to that described by SHRIMP and 40Ar–39Ar laser probe dating techniques. Compston et al. (1992) and Williams and Claesson These samples were selected on the basis of relative (1987). U–Pb isotopic ratios in the unknown samples deformation intensities and crosscutting relationships, were normalised to a 206Pb/238U value of 0.1859 (equiv- in order to analyse the different magmatic events that alent to an age of 1099.1 Ma) for AS3. The U and Th occurred in the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia. concentrations were determined relative to those mea- sured in the SL13 standard. In most cases, ages were 3.1. Methodology calculated using the 206Pb/238U ratios, with the correc- tion for common Pb being made using the measured 3.1.1. Ion microprobe (SHRIMP) U–Pb zircon dating 207Pb/206Pb and 206Pb/238U values following Tera and Despite the advances made in geochronological Wasserburg (1972) and as described in Compston et al. techniques, deciphering the geochronology of complex (1992). In those cases where it was more appropriate to metamorphic terranes is still challenging as problems use the radiogenic 207Pb/206Pb compositions to calcu- arise from overprinting of pre-existing assemblages by late ages, the ages were determined using the directly 68 B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 measured 204Pb/206Pb ratios and the relevant model atmospheric contamination. Unless otherwise stated, common Pb composition after Cumming and Richards errors are 1r uncertainties and include errors in the J- (1975). Uncertainties in the isotopic ratios and ages in value estimates. the data tables (and in the error bars in the plotted data) are reported at the one sigma (1r) level, but final 3.2. Chronological results weighted mean ages are reported with 95% confidence limits (2r). 3.2.1. Metoarbasebat granite This granite occurs in the northern part of the 3.1.2. 40Ar–39Ar dating Moyale–Sololo granite-gneiss complex close to the 40Ar–39Ar data from biotite, amphibole and musco- Moyale ophiolitic fold and thrust belt (Figs. 2 and 3) vite were obtained at the Anglo American Research around Metoarbasebat village on both sides of the Laboratories (AARL), Johannesburg. Samples were main Addis Ababa–Moyale road. It occurs as circular to crushed and sieved. Some 20 biotite–muscovite–amphi- semi-elliptical domes. The granite is coarse-grained, bole grains were extracted for analysis. The grains were pink to grey, and composed of K-feldspar, plagio- ultrasonically cleaned in de-ionised water and acetone clase, hornblende and quartz. ANE–SW to ENE–WSW and visually inspected for signs of alteration. The grains trending fabric, defined by mineral (mainly plagioclase, were then packed into the center of aluminium foil hornblende and quartz grains) alignment, is discernible. pockets and placed in an evacuated quartz glass vial, The granite shows porphyritic texture with large phe- together with the irradiation standard Hb3gr (Turner, nocrysts of amphiboles and plagioclase. Coarse-grained 1971). Flux monitors were placed within 2 mm of the quartz veins cut across the granite. Mafic xenoliths with sample packet. Neutron irradiation was carried out in diameters of 10–20 cm have been observed. As this position B2W of the Safari-1 reactor, Pelindaba (South granite is spatially close to the Moyale ophiolitic fold Africa), for a period of 40 hours at 10 MW. After ir- and thrust sub-belt (Fig. 2), it is assumed that these radiation and cooling, grains were individually loaded xenoliths are derived from this sub-belt. into 1 mm diameter wells in a 22 mm diameter alu- The zircons from sample BY96-10B of this granite minium disk. The disk was then covered with a sapphire are small (80–120 lm in length), colourless to light glass cover slip to ensure containment and to protect the pink, and are mainly subhedral, with occasional acicular coated quartz glass window of the high-vacuum sample forms. Cathodoluminescence imaging revealed strong port. Prior to analysis the samples were baked at 200 compositional zoning in most of the zircons, which also °C for 12 hours to remove adsorbed volatiles. Fifty in- shows that some grains have cores of inherited zircon. dividual Hb3gr grains from five irradiation positions These cores are surrounded by zoned overgrowths (Fig. were analysed in order to calculate an average J-value. 4a). Core/rim analyses were carried out using single pulses The U–Th–Pb results of the SHRIMP analyses for from a focused infrared laser beam. Gas purification this granite are reported in Table 5 and are plotted on a was achieved by means of two AP10 getter pumps, op- Tera–Wasserburg U–Pb concordia diagram in Fig. 5a. erated at 400 and 20 °C, respectively. Argon analyses The data are plotted uncorrected for common Pb, with were carried out on a MAP 215-50 static mass spec- the measured analyses plotting on a mixing line between trometer, equipped with a Nier-type source and Johnson a radiogenic end-member (on concordia) and a common multiplier detector, and operated at a mass resolution of Pb composition. The lower the common Pb content of 600. Procedural blanks were 7 Â 10À17 moles for 40Ar, the zircon, the closer the data points plot to the con- 2 Â 10À16 moles for 39Ar and 38Ar, 5 Â 10À17 moles for cordia. The majority of the data cluster near the con- 37Ar, and 4 Â 10À18 moles for 36Ar. Mass discrimination cordia and, thus, have very low common Pb content was monitored by analyses of standard air volumes (Fig. 5a). One analysis (5.1 in Table 5) plots away from from a Doerflinger pipette system. Analyses of co- this group and has a significant common Pb component. irradiated calcium and potassium salts yielded the Fifteen of the 16 analyses can be combined as a sta- 39 37 following isotope production ratios: ð Ar– ArÞCa ¼ tistically coherent group, for which a weighted mean 36 37 206 238 2 0:000754 0:000027; ð Ar– ArÞCa¼0:000319 0:000010; Pb/ U age of 526 5 Ma has been calculated (v ¼ 40 39 ð Ar– ArÞK ¼ 0:031 0:005. These values compare 0:72). The single analysis excluded from this calcula- favourably with analyses of a previous batch of salts, tion (6.1 in Table 5) appears to have suffered Pb loss. which were analysed by R. Burgess at Manchester Combining the field and petrographic observations, the University. The latter analysis yielded ratios of U–Pb SHRIMP age of 526 5 Ma is interpreted as the 0:000708 0:000024; 0:000312 0:00002; and 0:036 magmatic emplacement age. 0:008, respectively. The mean 40Ar–39Ar age obtained from laser probe All reported data have been corrected for system dating on biotite grains (Table 6) from the Metoar- blanks, mass discrimination, radioactive decay of 39Ar basebat granite is 506 4 Ma and from hornblende it is and 37Ar, reactor interference, fluence gradients and 511 4 Ma, and there is no age difference between the B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 69
Fig. 4. Cathodoluminescence images of dated zircon grains from the granitoid rocks of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia: (a) Metoarbasebat granite; (b) Meleka granodiorite; (c) Digati diorite gneiss; (d) Wadera megacrystic diorite gneiss; (e) Wadera deformed granite dyke; (f) Moyale granodiorite; (g) Melka Guba megacrystic diorite gneiss; (h) Bulbul mylonitic diorite gneiss. rim and core analyses. The age obtained from horn- NE–SW direction on slip planes and indicate that the blende is preferred, as hornblende has better Ar reten- rock is deformed. tion properties than biotite (Guo and Dickin, 1996). The heterogeneity of the zircon population of the This age is younger than the SHRIMP U–Pb zircon age Meleka granodiorite sample is shown in Fig. 4b. (526 5 Ma) and might indicate the cooling age of the Most grains exhibit lamellar (in fragments) or regular pluton. (in complete grains) and multiple zonation, resembling zonation typically observed in magmatic zircons. In 3.2.2. Meleka foliated granodiorite addition, a significant number of grains contain cores of The Meleka foliated granodiorite occurs in the possible xenocrystic nature (not analysed) with the ex- northernmost part of the Adola area (Figs. 2 and 3). ception of grain 7.1 (Table 5). Afew others have narrow This granodiorite intrudes the granitic gneisses of the overgrowths or exhibit embayments (analysis 9.2). This western part of the Adola granite-gneiss complex, close complexity is also reflected in the geochronological to its contact with the Megado Belt. The Meleka gran- results and the widely divergent U and Th contents and odiorite (sample BY96-13A) is composed of K-feldspar, U/Th ratios derived from the SHRIMP analyses (Table plagioclase, quartz and minor amounts of muscovite 5). Seventeen analyses on 15 grains were carried out and and biotite. It is weakly foliated and shows subtle NNE– are plotted, uncorrected for common Pb, on a Tera– SSW compositional layering defined by grey and pink Wasserburg U–Pb concordia diagram (Fig. 5b). Two layers. Aggregates of sulphide minerals are stretched in main observations can be made from this plot: (1) high 70 B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84
Fig. 4 (continued)
common Pb contents of some zircons; and (2) consid- gives a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 610 9 Ma, erable spread of ages for the analysed zircons. Some of and a second group of data gives a weighted mean 206Pb/ this complexity undoubtedly results from radiogenic Pb 238U age of 560 8 Ma (Age II). Three of the analyses loss (e.g., analysis 1.2 from a rim, Table 5), where ex- for this sample represent a much younger age group tremely high U concentrations (up to 4140 ppm) have (Age III) with ages between 489 and 515 Ma (compare resulted in extensive radioactive damage. This produces Table 5, not given in Fig. 5b). too young apparent ages. Anumber of analyses also The 40Ar–39Ar ages for biotite grains gave two groups plot to the left of the main cluster, which suggests the of ages: an older mean age of 534:5 8 and a younger presence of older, inherited components. Overall de- age of 512 4 Ma. The muscovite grains, however, gave tailed comparison of the data in Table 5 with the spots a mean age of 515 3 Ma, similar to the youngest age analysed at various places (cores rims, embayments, obtained from the biotite. various bands in complexly zoned grains) does not yield Age III (489–515 Ma) represents the youngest obvious correlation. For example, it is not always pos- SHRIMP data from zircons of the Meleka foliated sible to link data obtained from spots in outer zones or granodiorite and is similar to the ages obtained for the at rims of certain grains with the youngest ages deter- Metoarbasebat granite. The 40Ar–39Ar ages obtained mined. Thus, it is very difficult to anticipate a defi- from both granites are also similar. This suggests that nite magmatic emplacement age. It is possible, however, this age represents the youngest tectonothermal and based on a statistical assessment of the data, to define magmatic event to have occurred in the region. Age II of three groups of ages. The older group of data (Age I) 560 8 Ma is correlative with the emplacement age of B. Yibas et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (2002) 57–84 71
Table 5 Summary of SHRIMP U–Pb zircon results for granitoids of the Precambrian of southern Ethiopia