Simms Stream Forest
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Official List of Public Waters
Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area). -
Samplepalo Ooza 201 4
Samplepalooza 2014 Compiled by Andrea Donlon & Ryan O’Donnell Connecticut River Watershed Council 0 Samplepalooza 2014 Acknowledgements: CRWC would like thank the following staff people and volunteers who collected samples and/or participated in planning meetings: CRWC staff Peggy Brownell Andrea Donlon David Deen Andrew Fisk Ron Rhodes VT Department of Environmental Conservation Marie Caduto Tim Clear Ben Copans Blaine Hastings Jim Ryan Dan Needham NH Department of Environmental Services Amanda Bridge Barona DiNapoli Tanya Dyson Margaret (Peg) Foss Andrea Hansen David Neils Vicki Quiram Ted Walsh Watershed organizations: Black River Action Team – Kelly Stettner Ottaqueechee River Group – Shawn Kelley Southeast Vermont Watershed Alliance – Phoebe Gooding, Peter Bergstrom, Laurie Callahan, Cris White White River Partnership – Emily Miller CRWC volunteers: Greg Berry Marcey Carver Glenn English Jim Holmes Liberty Foster Paul Friedman Paul Hogan Sean Lawson Mark Lembke Dianne Rochford 1 Samplepalooza 2014 Table of Contents Acknowledgements: ............................................................................................................................................. 1 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... -
Trout-Stocking-Summary-2020.Pdf
NH FISH AND GAME DEPARTMENT - INLAND FISHERIES DIVISION FRESHWATER STOCKING SUMMARY BY WATERBODY: 1/1/2020-12/31/2020 WATERBODY TOWN SPECIES SIZE NUMBER ACADEMY BROOK LOUDON EBT 1+YR 350 AIRPORT POND WHITEFIELD EBT 1+YR 1,200 WHITEFIELD EBT 2+YR 210 AKERS POND ERROL RT 1+YR 4,000 ERROL RT 2+YR 500 AMMONOOSUC RIVER BATH BT 1+YR 3,794 BATH EBT 1+YR 1,000 BATH EBT 2+YR 184 BATH RT 1+YR 1,230 BETHLEHEM BT 1+YR 1,108 BETHLEHEM EBT 1+YR 1,600 BETHLEHEM RT 1+YR 1,000 CARROLL EBT 1+YR 7,625 CARROLL EBT 2+YR 397 CARROLL RT 1+YR 9,185 LISBON BT 1+YR 2,500 LISBON EBT 1+YR 200 LISBON RT 1+YR 1,500 LITTLETON BT 1+YR 300 LITTLETON EBT 1+YR 400 LITTLETON RT 1+YR 500 AMMONOOSUC RIVER, UPPER BERLIN BT 1+YR 200 BERLIN EBT 1+YR 2,000 MILAN BT 1+YR 800 MILAN EBT 1+YR 500 NORTHUMBERLAND BT 1+YR 800 NORTHUMBERLAND EBT 1+YR 400 STARK BT 1+YR 1,724 STARK EBT 1+YR 2,600 AMMONOOSUC RIVER, WILD BATH EBT 1+YR 1,700 BATH EBT 2+YR 30 ANDREW BROOK NEWBURY EBT 1+YR 200 ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER BERLIN BT 1+YR 2,000 BERLIN EBT 1+YR 8,654 BERLIN EBT 2+YR 500 BERLIN RT 1+YR 2,500 CAMBRIDGE BT 1+YR 1,000 CAMBRIDGE EBT 1+YR 4,254 CAMBRIDGE EBT 2+YR 200 CAMBRIDGE RT 1+YR 1,500 WATERBODY TOWN SPECIES SIZE NUMBER ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER DUMMER BT 1+YR 1,000 DUMMER EBT 1+YR 4,254 DUMMER EBT 2+YR 1,185 DUMMER RT 1+YR 2,000 ERROL BT 1+YR 1,184 ERROL EBT 1+YR 5,254 ERROL EBT 2+YR 300 ERROL EBT 3+YR 200 ERROL RT 1+YR 6,500 MILAN BT 1+YR 3,023 MILAN EBT 1+YR 5,054 MILAN EBT 2+YR 500 MILAN RT 1+YR 2,500 ARCHERY POND ALLENSTOWN EBT 1+YR 1,600 ALLENSTOWN EBT 2+YR 50 ALLENSTOWN RT 1+YR 250 ARMINGTON -
Aquatic Results
Aquatic Systems Results for Lower New England CLASSIFICATION RESULTS......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographic Framework for Aquatic Assessments .......................................................................................................... 1 Zoogeographic Regions..................................................................................................................................................1 Ecological Drainage Units (EDUs)..............................................................................................................................1 Physical Descriptions .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Characteristic Fish and Mussels (from NatureServe Database, 2002) .......................................................................... 4 Watershed Classification: Aquatic Ecological Systems ................................................................................................. 9 TWINSPAN Relationships............................................................................................................................................12 Explanation of Size 2 Watershed TWINSPAN System Splits.................................................................................... 13 Explanation of Size 3 Watershed System TWINSPAN Splits................................................................................... -
Document Overview January, 2008
New Hampshire Hydrography Dataset: Fourth Order and Higher Streams Document Overview January, 2008 This document contains a summary of fourth order and higher streams in New Hampshire, based on the 1:24,000-Scale New Hampshire Hydrography Dataset (NHHD). The NHHD is archived in the GRANIT database at Complex Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire. Description of worksheets in this document: Summary by GNIS Name: Summarizes stream length by GNIS name (Geographic Names Information System, from the U.S. Geological Survey). Please note that multiple streams across the state may have the same name. In these cases, the GNIS ID uniquely identifies individual streams. Stream length totals are therefore based on GNIS ID. Addionally, there are occurrences where streams did not receive a GNIS name. These streams could not be uniquely identified, and therefore were summarized as a group (Unnamed Stream/River). Summary by Stream Order: Summarizes stream length by stream order. Summary by Town Name: Summarizes stream length by town name. Process Steps: Describes GIS process used to extract data required to generate these summaries. Complex Systems Research Center On line mapping available at NH GRANIT Data Mapper: University of New Hampshire http://mapper.granit.unh.edu http://www.granit.unh.edu (select Water Resources theme) 1 New Hampshire Hydrography Dataset: Fourth Order and Higher Streams Summary by Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) Name January, 2008 GNIS* ID GNIS* Name Stream Order Town Name Stream Length (ft) 00865195 -
Transitional Water Fish Assemblage Index of Biotic Integrity for New Hampshire Wadeable Streams
Transitional Water Fish Assemblage Index of Biotic Integrity for New Hampshire Wadeable Streams January 2011 R-WD-11-6 Transitional Water Fish Assemblage Index of Biotic Integrity for New Hampshire Wadeable Streams New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services PO Box 95 29 Hazen Drive Concord, NH 03302-3503 (603) 271-8865 Thomas S. Burack Commissioner Michael J. Walls Assistant Commissioner Harry T. Stewart Director Water Division Prepared By: David E. Neils Biological Program Manager January 2011 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………….. 4 2. GENERAL PROCESS FOR TWIBI DEVELOPMENT ………………………… 5 3. METHODS ………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3.1 Identification of Expected Transitional Water Fish Assemblage Areas . 5 3.2 Comparison of Transitional and Strict Coldwater Assemblages ……… 6 3.3 Dataset ……………………………………………………………………… 6 3.4 Biological Response Indicators (metrics) ………………………………… 8 3.5 TWIBI scoring and threshold identification ……………………………. 10 3.6 Final Index Score Performance Evaluation ..................................................... 10 4. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Transitional vs. Strict Coldwater Assemblages ………………………… 11 4.2 Transitional Water Fish Assemblage Area ...................................................... 15 4.3 Dataset Comparability ………………………………………………….... 16 4.4 Biological Response Indicators …………………………………………... 17 4.5 Metric and TWIBI Scoring ……………………………………………… 20 4.6 IBI -
NANA Celebrates Hospice Certification
Mills and Bliss leaving long coaching legacy at Newfound Story on Page B1 THURSDAY,Newfound NOVEMBER 13, 2014 FREE IN PRINT, FREE ON-LINE • WWW.NEWFOUNDLANDING.COM Landing COMPLIMENTARY NANA celebrates Hospice Certification BY MARCIA MORRIS the benefits of hospice. Contributing Writer But continuity of care BRISTOL—The New- can be so important to found Area Nursing patients and their fam- Association (NANA) re- ilies, especially at this cently announced that it difficult time of transi- has completed require- tion. We wanted to pro- ments for full Hospice vide them with the very Certification. best experience possible The long established, at the end of their life’s highly regarded, visit- journey.” ing nurses home health “It was also hard on agency has been offering the NANA staff, to give hospice care for clients up our patients to an- for over a year, but un- other agency just at the til recently has not been point when they need- able to receive Medi- ed us the most,” said care reimbursement for Clinical and Hospice Di- its services. Executive rector, Amanda Drake. Director Patricia Went- “In many cases we had worth says that NANA cared for patients for a is “ecstatic” and very long time and developed proud to have completed deep and trusting rela- the rigorous hospice cer- tionships with family COURTESY tification process. members and caregivers The staff of the Newfound Area Nursing Association (NANA) is celebrating the achievement of full Hospice Certification. Front “Hospice certification as well.” row (left to right), Virginia Howlett RN, Amanda Drake RN, Hospice Director, Scott Meyer MSW, Social Worker. -
Week Ending May 21, 2021
Week Ending May 21, 2021 Town Waterbody Acworth Cold River Alexandria Smith River Allenstown Archery Pond Allenstown Bear Brook Allenstown Catamount Pond Alstead Cold River Alton Winnipesaukee Lake Amherst Joe English Brook Amherst Souhegan River Andover Hopkins Pond Ashland Squam River Auburn Massabesic Lake Barrington Isinglass River Barrington Stonehouse Pond Bartlett Saco River Bath Pettyboro Brook Benton Tunnel Brook Bethlehem Gale River Bethlehem Zealand River Brentwood Exeter River Bristol Newfound River Bristol Pemigewasset River Brookfield Pike Brook Canaan Mascoma River Candia Tower Hill Pond Carroll Ammonoosuc River Carroll Saco Lake Center Harbor Winona Lake Colebrook Mohawk River Colebrook Mohawk River, East Branch Columbia Connecticut River Week Ending May 21, 2021 Town Waterbody Columbia Simms Stream Conway Saco River Danbury Smith River Danbury Waukeena Lake Derry Big Island Pond Dublin Dublin Lake Dummer Dummer Pond Big Effingham South River Enfield Mascoma River Franconia Gale River Franconia Ham Branch Franconia Lafayette Brook Franklin Pemigewasset River Franklin Winnipesaukee River Fremont Exeter River Gilford Winnipesaukee Lake Gilsum Ashuelot River Grafton Tewksbury Pond Greenfield Contoocook River Groton Cockermouth River Hancock Contoocook River Hart's Location Saco River Hebron Cockermouth River Henniker Contoocook River Henniker French Pond Jaffrey Contoocook River Jefferson Isreal River Jefferson Kids Pond Lancaster Israel River Landaff Mill Brook Lebanon Blood Brook Week Ending May 21, 2021 Town Waterbody Lebanon -
Water Monitoring Strategy Condition Report: Status and Trends of Water Quality Indicators from the River Monitoring Network
R-WD-19-21 Water Monitoring Strategy Condition Report: Status and trends of water quality indicators from the River Monitoring Network Ashuelot River, Hinsdale, MA May 2019 R-WD-19-21 Water Monitoring Strategy Condition Report: Status and trends of water quality indicators from the River Monitoring Network New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-3509 (603) 271-8865 Robert R. Scott Commissioner Clarke Freise Assistant Commissioner Thomas O’Donovan Water Division Director Ted Diers Watershed Bureau Administrator Prepared by David Neils, Chief Water Pollution Biologist May 2019 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 The river monitoring network (RMN) .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Indicators of condition ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.0 STUDY DETAILS AND ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Data collection ............................................................................................................................................ -
Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Coos County, New Hampshire— New County, for Coos Needs Hazard Mapping of Flood —Scoping
Flynn, R.H. Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 —Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Coos County, New Hampshire— Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Coos County, New Hampshire Open-File Report 2006–1200 Open-File Report 2006–1200 U.S. Department of the Interior Printed on recycled paper U.S. Geological Survey Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Coos County, New Hampshire By Robert H. Flynn In cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 Open-File Report 2006–1200 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Acknowledgments The author thanks Debra Foster for her assistance in contacting towns in Coos County to obtain preliminary scoping needs information and for editing this report, Ann Marie Squillacci for her help in formatting the tables, and Tina Cotton for her help with the figures. Contents Section 1. Introduction . 1 Background. 1 Scope of Work . 2 Section 2. Data Collected from Coos County Communities . -
Site Classification for the New Hampshire Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) Using a Non-Linear Predictive Model
Site classification for the New Hampshire benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) using a non-linear predictive model January 2011 Site classification for the New Hampshire Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) using a non-linear predictive model New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services PO Box 95 29 Hazen Drive Concord, NH 03302-3503 (603) 271-8865 Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner Michael J. Walls Assistant Commissioner Harry T. Stewart Director Water Division Prepared By: Benjamin Jessup Tetra Tech, Inc. David Neils Biomonitoring Program Manager, NHDES January 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODS and RATIONALE 2 2.1 Dataset 2 2.2 Macroinvertebrates 4 2.3 Environmental Setting 4 2.4 Data Analysis 5 2.5 Defining Biological Groupings 6 2.5.1 Cluster Analysis 6 2.5.2 Ordination 6 2.5.3 Indicator Taxa 7 2.5.4 Metric Distributions 7 2.6 Discerning Environmental Factors 7 2.6.1 Variable Distributions 7 2.6.2 Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) 8 2.7 Predicting Site Classes 8 2.7.1 Discrete Classes 8 2.7.2 Non-Linear Predictions 8 2.8 Applications in Assessment 9 2.8.1 Existing Classification 9 2.8.2 Thresholds and Expectations 9 3. RESULTS 10 3.1 Biological Group Identification 10 3.2 Indicator Taxa Identification 11 3.3 Metric Distributions 12 3.4 Ordination Results 13 3.5 Variable Distributions 18 3.6 Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) 20 3.7 Prediction of Natural Classes 22 3.8 Applications in Bioassessment 26 4. DISCUSSION 28 5. REFERENCES 32 6. -
Lower New England – Northern Piedmont Ecoregional Conservation Plan; First Iteration Edited
Lower New England – Northern Piedmont Ecoregional Conservation Plan; First Iteration Edited PREPARED BY Henry Barbour and the LNE/NP Ecoregional Planning Team January 2001 EDITED BY Conservation Science Support Northeast & Caribbean Division February 2003 This document may be cited as follows: Barbour, H., M.G. Anderson et al. 2003. Lower New England – Northern Piedmont Ecoregional Conservation Plan; First Iteration, Edited. The Nature Conservancy, Northeast & Caribbean Division, Boston, MA Ó 2003 The Nature Conservancy. All rights reserved. Executive Summary None written. Turn the page for Introduction and Acknowledgements. INCOMPLETE EXEC-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION TO THE ECOREGION PRIORITIES AND LEADERSHIP ASSIGNMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY SPECIES Planning Methods for Ecoregional Targets: Species Results for Species TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND COMMUNITIES Planning Methods for Ecoregional Targets: Terrestrial Ecosystems and Communities Results for Terrestrial Communities and Systems MATRIX-FORMING ECOSYSTEMS Planning Methods for Ecoregional Targets: Matrix-Forming Ecosystems Results for Matrix-Forming Ecosystems AQUATIC SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS Planning Methods for Ecoregional Targets: Freshwater Aquatic Ecosystems Aquatic Results Results for Aquatic Systems Classification Results Geographic framework for aquatic assessments Watershed classification: Aquatic ecological systems Reach level classification: Macrohabitats Classification: Discussion and Conclusion Condition Results GIS screening Expert interviews