DOCSLIB.ORG

Neurolinguistic Aspects of Attrition Barbara Köpke

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neurolinguistic Aspects of Attrition Barbara Köpke Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition Barbara Köpke To cite this version: Barbara Köpke. Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, Elsevier, 2004, 17 (1), pp.3-30. 10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00051-4. hal-00856482 HAL Id: hal-00856482 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00856482 Submitted on 9 Sep 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition Barbara Köpke Laboratoire Jacques Lordat (EA 1941) Institut des Sciences du Cerveau de Toulouse (IFR n° 96) Université Toulouse-Le Mirail Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17 (1), 3-30. Abstract The aim of this paper is to provide the reader with a general overview of the field of attrition. Having situated this relatively new research domain with respect to related fields and approaches, a brief summary of the most important research questions and preliminary findings is given. The discussion then focuses on two issues that are of particular interest with respect to neurolinguistics: the role of the subject’s age and of the influence of L2. Concerning the former, a summary of research on the critical period hypothesis is given and discussed in the light of findings from attrition research. Another issue concerns the principal mechanisms involved in L1 attrition, i.e. whether attrition occurs because of lack of L1 use or because of its replacement by the competing L2 structures. Research issues of such scope need integrative approaches and greatly benefit from comparisons with related fields such as normal aging, acquisition and aphasia. Keywords: bilingualism, attrition, neuropsycholinguistics, critical period, interference 1 Attrition can be defined as the non pathological loss of a language in, usually, bilingual subjects. From an epistemological point of view, it can be seen as a subfield of contact linguistics (e.g., Goebl, Nelde, Stary & Wölck, 1996; Myers-Scotton, 2002), but it should be distinguished from sociolinguistic contact phenomena such as language change, shift, loss and death in bilingual communities. It is generally assumed that, like shift, attrition is a ‘negative’ consequence of language contacti, leading to loss on either the form or function level. However, language change, shift and death typically take place in bilingual communities across generations, whereas the term ‘attrition’ is used to refer to individual language loss and consequently takes place within one generation (de Bot, 2001). Furthermore, ‘attrition’ can be defined as loss of the structural aspects of language, i.e. change or reduction in form, whilst ‘shift’ is a loss of functional aspects, i.e. the gradual replacement of one language by another with respect to language use (Clyne, 1986, 2001). It is this focus on structural aspects in individual language loss that makes the attrition field so promising for multidisciplinary approaches: besides its obvious sociolinguistic dimension, attrition also allows the testing of linguistic hypotheses and psycholinguistic models of the interaction of two languages in the human brain/mind, and it thus finds a natural place within the field of neurolinguistics, completing the picture of language deterioration along with the data from L1 loss in healthy aging and pathological loss in aphasia or dementia. Particularly, psycholinguistic data on attrition are crucially needed in order to have a more comprehensive understanding of premorbid linguistic competence in multilinguals. Conversely, attrition research will benefit very much from taking neurolinguistic models into account since the mechanisms underlying attrition might well be related to general brain functioning. The main research questions raised by these different disciplines can be summarized as follows: (a) Why does attrition occur? Most attention has been paid to external factors which influence attrition such as age (discussed below), education level (e.g., Jaspaert & Kroon, 1989; Yagmur, 1997), emigration length (e.g., Ammerlaan, 1996; de Bot, Gommans & Rossing, 1991; Hutz, 2004), or amount of contact with L1 (e.g., de Bot et al., 1991; Köpke, 1999). Some studies have attempted to integrate these factors within larger sociolinguistic frameworks, e.g., Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory (Hulsen, 2000; Yagmur, 1997) or Social Network Theory (Hulsen, 2000), the findings, however, have so far been inconclusive. More recently, internal factors for language attrition such as emotion (Dewaele, 2004; Pavlenko, 2002a; Schmid, 2002, 2004) or attitudes and motivation (Köpke, 2000) have received some attention with promising results that clearly call for further investigation. (b) What kind of structure is affected by attrition? Are some linguistic features more vulnerable than others? Indisputably, attrition is selective (cf. Seliger, 1991: 228) and does not concern all aspects of language in the same way. This question has mostly been addressed in broad linguistic investigations focusing either on intralanguage effects (simplification, over- generalization) or on interlanguage effects (cross-linguistic influence), but despite a growing number of studies within this perspective, research is still rather inconsistent and lacks coherence (see Köpke & Schmid, 2004, for a more detailed discussion and references). Only recently have specific theoretical frameworks been used more systematically, for example Chomsky’s Universal Grammar (UG) and minimalism (e.g., Cuza, 2002; Gürel, 2002, this issue; McCormack, 2001; Montrul, 2002; Sorace, 2000) or Myers-Scotton & Jake’s (2000) 4- M-Model (e.g., Bolonyai, 1999; Gross, 2000; Schmitt, 2001). (c) How does attrition occur? This question addresses the nature of the psycholinguistic and neurological mechanisms underlying attrition. This is the aspect the present paper will focus on, since the factors discussed here fall under this question. Psycholinguistic issues regarding attrition have been theorized since early days of research within the field, e.g., the competence/performance issue discussed in Sharwood Smith (1983a, 1983b, 1989), who drew attention to the fact that attrition may, in many cases, involve difficulties in the control of the two linguistic systems rather than actual modification of one system. As Seliger & Vago (1991: 4) pointed out, “the languages spoken by the bilingual may be said, metaphorically, to coexist in a state of competition for a finite amount of memory and processing space in the mind of the speaker”. This view is in line with neurolinguistic frameworks for bilingualism such as Green’s Inhibitory Control Modelii (Green, 1986, 1998) 2 or Paradis’ Activation Threshold Hypothesis (Paradis, e.g., 1993, 2001) (see Gürel, this issue, for a description). Within such frameworks, processing difficulties (or ‘performance attrition’)—like delayed lexical retrieval which is frequently observed in L1 attrition (e.g., Ammerlaan, 1996; Olshtain & Barzilay, 1991) and described in more detail in Goral (this issue)—can be explained on the basis of the raising of activation thresholds for items (or a language) used less frequently (Paradis, 1993: 138), and/or of lack of resources in the less frequently used language (Green, 1986) (for a more detailed discussion of these issues, with respect to attrition, see Gürel, this issue; Köpke, 2002). It is now widely recognized that bilinguals are not the sum of two unilinguals (Grosjean, 1989). This difference does not have to be ascribed to specific mechanisms for the processing of two languages (Paradis, 1980: 503), but bilinguals have repeatedly been shown to be slower than unilinguals on at least some tasks: e.g., Mack (1983) in naming and lexical decision; Mägiste (1979, 1985) in naming, recall and matching; Kilborn (1989) in sentence processing; Segalowitz (1991) in primed lexical decision in the controlled but not in the automatic access condition (see Goral, this issue, for more details), and Soares & Grosjean (1984) in lexical decision on non-words only (see Green, 2002, for a summary of more recent data). Longer response times in balanced bilinguals can be attributed to lexical access in bilinguals not being selective (e.g., De Bruijn et al., 2001; Green, 2002: 241), but they can also reveal difficulty in the control of two language systems (Green, 1986). In non-balanced bilinguals, longer response times are generally found in the weaker languageiii (and are sometimes taken as measures for language balance in bilinguals, e.g., Mägiste 1979, 1985). The weaker, non-dominant language is generally the second language in late bilinguals, but it has long been recognized that even in late bilinguals the dominance pattern can be reversed when language use changes substantially. In this case, response times slow down in L1 as L2 becomes the dominant language (e.g., Frenck-Mestre, 1993; Lachman & Mistler-Lachman, 1976; Segalowitz, 1991). The fact that little attention has, so far, been devoted to this point may have two reasons. Firstly, research on bilingualism has probably mostly been carried out on L2 learners for whom the L1 is still dominant, although they are highly
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

20 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Language Development Language Development
    Language Development rom their very first cries, human beings communicate with the world around them. Infants communicate through sounds (crying and cooing) and through body lan- guage (pointing and other gestures). However, sometime between 8 and 18 months Fof age, a major developmental milestone occurs when infants begin to use words to speak. Words are symbolic representations; that is, when a child says “table,” we understand that the word represents the object. Language can be defined as a system of symbols that is used to communicate. Although language is used to communicate with others, we may also talk to ourselves and use words in our thinking. The words we use can influence the way we think about and understand our experiences. After defining some basic aspects of language that we use throughout the chapter, we describe some of the theories that are used to explain the amazing process by which we Language9 A system of understand and produce language. We then look at the brain’s role in processing and pro- symbols that is used to ducing language. After a description of the stages of language development—from a baby’s communicate with others or first cries through the slang used by teenagers—we look at the topic of bilingualism. We in our thinking. examine how learning to speak more than one language affects a child’s language develop- ment and how our educational system is trying to accommodate the increasing number of bilingual children in the classroom. Finally, we end the chapter with information about disorders that can interfere with children’s language development.
    [Show full text]
  • Review: a Study in Human Capacities Reviewed Work(S): Genie. A
    Review: A Study in Human Capacities Reviewed Work(s): Genie. A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day "Wild Child" by Susan Curtiss Susan Goldin-Meadow Science, New Series, Vol. 200, No. 4342. (May 12, 1978), pp. 649-651. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819780512%293%3A200%3A4342%3C649%3AASIHC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-P Science is currently published by American Association for the Advancement of Science. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/aaas.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Mind and Communication in Autism Francesca Gabrielle
    Theory of Mind and Communication in Autism Francesca Gabrielle Elizabeth Happe, MRC Cognitive Development Unit, and Department of Psychology, University College, London. Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. in Psychology, University of London. October, 1991. 1 Acknowledgements My greatest thanks must go to Uta Frith, who made writing this thesis not only possible but pleasurable. I have benefitted enormously from her unstinting encouragement, her insightful criticisms, and her great kindness. I would also like to thank all my colleagues at the MRC Cognitive Development Unit, particularly Annette Kanniloff-Smith, Alan Leslie and John Morton, for teaching me so much which I hadn't realised I didn't know. Thanks also go to Fran Siddons, James Blair and other friends, who have been invaluable in the discussion of fledgling ideas. I am also extremely grateful to the autistic children and adults who took part in the studies reported here. They, along with their teachers and parents, have taught me a great deal about autism, and shown me how much more there is still to discover. Lastly, my thanks go to my family for their unfailing support and enthusiasm. A.M.D.G. 2 Abstract Recent work investigating the biological and cognitive nature of autism is reviewed. The hypothesis that autistic individuals suffer from a specific impairment in theory of mind, and the relevance of this notion to the diagnosis of Asperger's syndrome, is discussed. Theory of mind explanations of autism must account for the minority of autistic subjects who pass false belief tasks. Two possible accounts are considered; delay versus "hacking".
    [Show full text]
  • Language & the Brain Broca's Aphasia Wernicke's Aphasia the ARCUATE FASCICULUS Bilinguals: a Neural Signature?
    10/8/2009 Language & The Brain Broca’s Aphasia Dr. Gardner: “Were you in the Broca’s Coast Guard?” Area Broca’s Area Mr. Ford (patient): “No, er, yes, yes … ship … Massachu … chusetts … Coastguard…years”. He held up his hand twice indicating 19. Gardner H. The Shattered Mind. New York: Vintage Books, 1974, pp 60-61 Posterior Speech 1. Language Comprehension (good) Areas Including Wernicke’s Area 2. Speech Production (impaired): • Nonfluent • Words improperly formed Posterior Speech Areas • Slow and slurred Including Wernicke’s • Paraphasic errors: “purnpike” Area (for turnpike) Wernicke’s Aphasia THE ARCUATE FASCICULUS Dr. Gardner: “What brings you to Broca’s the hospital?” I asked the 72- Area year-old retired butcher four weeks after his admission to the hospital. White Matter Tract that connects Broca’s Area and Mr. Gorgan (patient): Wernicke’s Area “Boy, I’m sweating, I’m awful nervous, you know, once in a while I get caught up, I can’t mention the tarripoi, a month agok, quite a Damage: Conduction Aphasia Posterior Speech little, I’ve done a lot well, I Areas Including impose a lot, while on the other 1. Language Comprehension: Wernicke’s Area hand, you know what I mean, I intact In 97% of people, both Broca's Area and have to run around, look it over, Wernicke's Area only on left hemisphere. 2. Fluent speech with some trebbin and all that sort of stuff. 1. Language Comprehension (poor) paraphasic errors Gardner H. The Shattered Mind. New York: Vintage Books, 3. Inability to repeat words 2. Speech fluent but nonsensical 1974, pp 67-68 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Acquisition
    HOMEWORK 10: Language Acquisition. QUESTION 1: FROM ADULT TO CHILD GRAMMAR: PHONOLOGICAL RULES. In class, we discussed the ways in which children tend to simplify the pronunciation of certain adult sounds at early stages of the language acquisition process. Children are generally quite consistent in their replacements and substitutions at any given time, and that we can actually state phonological rules to derive their pronunciation from the adult one. For example, for the common child pronunciations [wUk] for look and [tw k] for truck we could say something like "replace all liquids (l,r) with the glide [w]". Come up with rules to describe the replacements and deletions of sounds in the following examples. That is, a) For each word, state the changes that are made to convert an adult pronunciation into this child's form; b) Summarize the general changes based on all the words. Remember that phonological rules usually don't refer to specific sounds like [p], but to natural classes like "voiceless stops". Thus the general rules you give in this part should also be stated in terms of natural classes rather than specific sounds wherever possible. a. Smith [mIt] b. skin [kIn] c. play [pe] d. zoo [du] e. John [dan] f. bath [bæt] g. tent [t t] h. teddy [t di] i. crush [k t] j. bump [b p] c) Based on this pattern, what is the expected pronunciation of the following words? Give answers in phonetic transcription; identify the changes that you predict. k. stop l. junk m. thumb n. zebra 1 QUESTION 2: GENIE: THE STORY OF A ‘WILD CHILD’ a) Read this background information (various sources): Genie was discovered by the authorities at the age of 13, having been kept in virtual isolation for most of her life, and treated cruelly by her father (her nearly blind and totally helpless mother was more of a victim than a participant in this cruelty).
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Reading
    AP PSYCHOLOGY SUMMER READING 2018 Summer Assignments for AP Psychology The assigned reading is as follows: Genie: A Scientific Tragedy The assigned reading is as Januaryfollows: 12, Genie: 1994 by A Russ Scientific Rymer Tragedy, January 12, 1994 by Russ Rymer There are a number of things to consider when reading this book. Students are There are a number of thingsencouraged to consider to when take notes reading and thisponder book. various Students points. areThe encouraged depth of psychology to take notes and ponder variousinterwoven points. The and depththe layers of psychology of implications interwoven of this story and are the immense. layers of Students implications of this story are shouldimmense. identify Students and evaluate should the identify psychological and evalua elementste the found psyc inhological the text. elements found in the text. Complete the following: 1) What influence does the following argument have on the case of Genie: nature vs nurture? 2) What does it mean to be a “feral child” and how does this apply to Genie? 3) Is there any family background that lends itself to understanding the abuse Genie endured (explicit or implicit)? 4) Evaluate the family members, individually and collectively. Further evaluate the community in which Genie lived. 5) Discuss the role of The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) in Genie’s case. 6) Identify Susan Curtiss and James Kent. 7) Provide an assessment of Genie’s emotional and cognitive abilities. 8) Where was Genie ‘developmentally’ when discovered? Where should she have been (in terms of age)? 9) Discuss the following: “critical period” and “language acquisition” then state how each relates/applies to Genie’s case.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Feral Children and Original Sin
    Verbum Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 9 December 2010 An Investigation of Feral Children and Original Sin Christina Regelsberger St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum Part of the Religion Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Regelsberger, Christina (2010) "An Investigation of Feral Children and Original Sin," Verbum: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 9. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol8/iss1/9 This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol8/iss1/9 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact fisherpub@sjfc.edu. An Investigation of Feral Children and Original Sin Abstract In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. "The subject of feral children has often been explored from a variety of viewpoints and angles. Frequently, such topics as education, language acquisition, emotional stability, mental stability and behavioral patterns are reviewed. However, the motive of actions or the inherent tendency of feral children to behave one way or another is often overlooked. The question remains whether feral children (prior to their integration into society), are in possession of original sin. Many maintain that all humans are born with an inherent desire to do evil. However, is it the result of social stimulation or merely an innate propensity to sin? Before such a question can be answered, a short discourse on original sin is necessary. Thus, I intend to explore and discuss the theories of original sin presented by both St.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Processing and the Human Brain
    01:615:201 Introduction to Linguistic Theory Adam Szczegielniak Language Processing and the Human Brain Copyright in part: Cengage learning The Human Mind at Work • Psycholinguistics: the study of linguistic performance in speech production and comprehension – Linking psychological mechanisms to grammar to understand language production and comprehension Comprehension: The Speech Signal • When we push air through the glos, vibrang vocal cords produce variaons in air pressure – The speed of these variaons in air pressure determines the fundamental frequency of the sounds • Fundamental frequency is perceived as pitch by the hearer – The magnitude of the variaons (or intensity) determines the loudness of the sound Comprehension: The Speech Signal • An image of the speech signal is displayed in a spectrogram • Vowels are indicated by dark bands called formants Parsing of sound • Categorical percep5on – We do not perceive linguis5c sounds as a connuum • Duplex percepon – Are able to integrate ‘spliced’ parts of a sound played into each ear VOT • Voice onset 5me differen5ates voiced sounds from voiceless p b t d k g The six English plosives [p, b, t, d, k, g], each followed by the vowel [a]. Top picture is of spectrograms. The y-axis represents frequency range 0-5kHz, with each 1kHz marked by a horizontal gray line. The x-axis is time - about 4s overall. The bottom picture is the same data in time aligned waveforms. ©Kate Morton 1995 http://www.essex.ac.uk/speech/material/kate/ref/vot-13.html VOT percepon %identifying identical cat ba pa VOT Formants - how to splice a sound Frequency response curves (indicating the preferred resonating frequencies of the vocal tract).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Proceedings of a Symposium Sponsored by the Carl
    9 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 202 252 FL 0123111 . AUTHOR Cohen, D., Ed. °TITLE The Neurolinguistics of Second Language LearniAg.. PUB DATE 80 NOTE 68p.;. Summary of proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Carl. and Durga Spiro -Foundation (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 8-11, 1980). EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus. Postage". DESCRIPTORS *Bilingualism; *Language Processing; *Language Research; LinguistiC Theory; *SeurolinguiStic0; *Second Language Learning; Teaching Methods. ABSTRACT These proceedings are a collection of paperby researchers in neurology, bilingualism; linguistics,:and the neurolinguistics of bilingualism. Topics are- addressed using neurolinguistic data for second language learning, learning models fo'iecond language acquisition, and implications for teaching and, research. Summaries of the following papers are included: (1) "Laterilization in Bilinguals," by L. Obler;(2) "Polyglot Aphasia," by M. Paradis;A3). "Second Language Adquisition Theory," by S. Krashen;(4) ."Neurofunallional Issues in Bilingualism," by B. A- Whitaker; .(5)" Neurolinguistic Explanations of the Difference0 between Language Teaching Methods," by K. Diller; and (6)'"Genetation of New Ideas for Teaching and Research," by. C.. B. Paulston. The papers -have prepared commentaries by-the following: H. Gocaglass, J. B. Gleason, V. Fromkin, and A. D. Cohen. A general discussion of the papers concludes the volume. (ARE) r **************************************************************#******** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * ************************************3t*************************#******** ThejleurolingUidviCs of Second Language Learning I A symposium organized by Loraine Obler and Andrew Cohen, spansored by the Carl and Durga Spiro Foundation, and held in Rio de Jaderio, April 8-11, 1980. 07 - Summary prepared by Jyotsna Vaid and edited by Andrew D.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Period Controversies for Second Language Acquisition: Implications for Language Teaching
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 6-2020 CRITICAL PERIOD CONTROVERSIES FOR SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING Randy Lucio Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Applied Linguistics Commons, Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Education Policy Commons, First and Second Language Acquisition Commons, and the Language and Literacy Education Commons Recommended Citation Lucio, Randy, "CRITICAL PERIOD CONTROVERSIES FOR SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING" (2020). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 1093. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/1093 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact scholarworks@csusb.edu. CRITICAL PERIOD CONTROVERSIES FOR SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in English Composition: Applied Linguistics and Teaching English as a Second Language by Randy Lucio June 2020 CRITICAL PERIOD CONTROVERSIES FOR SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Randy Lucio June 2020 Approved by: Sunny Hyon, Committee Chair, English Rong Chen, Committee Member © 2020 Randy Lucio ABSTRACT It was proposed by Eric Lenneberg (1967) in Biological Foundations of Language that implicit first language (L1) acquisition was only possible during a critical period (CP) spanning from infancy to puberty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innateness Hypothesis
    Hugvísindasvið The Innateness Hypothesis Can Knowledge of Language be Inborn? Ritgerð til BA prófs í ensku Bryndís Samúelsdóttir Janúar 2015 Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Enska The Innateness Hypothesis Can Knowledge of Language be Inborn? Ritgerð til BA prófs í ensku Bryndís Samúelsdóttir Kt.: 120490-2739 Leiðbeinandi: Dr. Matthew Whelpton Janúar 2015 Abstract This essay assesses the importance of the innateness hypothesis during the process of first language acquisition. The innateness hypothesis is the hypothesis, presented by Noam Chomsky, that children are born with knowledge of the fundamental principles of grammar. Chomsky asserts with his theory that this inborn knowledge helps children to acquire their native language effortlessly and systematically despite the complexity of the process. Acquiring language is likely the single most difficult process of a child’s maturation period. Yet children do not seem to know how much knowledge they are acquiring and processing. In this essay, this process is analyzed in the context of Chomsky’s theories of universal and generative grammar and the language faculty. The process of first language acquisition is surveyed from the very first weeks of a child’s life up until the time that grammar is finalized. It is widely debated how children master knowledge of their native language. Criticism of Chomsky’s theory is discussed as well as Piaget’s constructivist and Skinner’s behaviorist theories of language acquisition. Finally, the critical period is discussed and compared to cases of abnormal language acquisition. It turns out that the innateness hypothesis, although still not accepted as fact, has stayed resilient and this thesis argues that it remains the strongest hypothesis to describe the way children acquire language.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi-Autistic Patterns Following Severe Early Global Privation
    J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 537–549. 1999 Cambridge University Press ' 1999 Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved 0021–9930\99 $15.00j0.00 Quasi-autistic Patterns Following Severe Early Global Privation Michael Rutter, Lucie Andersen-Wood, Celia Beckett, Diana Bredenkamp†, Jenny Castle, Christine Groothues, Jana Kreppner, Lisa Keaveney, Catherine Lord, Thomas G. O’Connor, and the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and Social Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, London, U.K. Six per cent of child in a sample of 111 children who were adopted into U.K. families from Romania, and who were systematically assessed at the ages of 4 and 6 years, showed autistic- like patterns of behaviour. A further 6% showed milder (usually isolated) autistic features. Such autistic characteristics were not found in a similarly studied sample of 52 children adopted in the first 6 months of life within the U.K. The children from Romania with autistic patterns showed clinical features closely similar to ‘‘ordinary’’ autism at 4 years but they differed with respect to the improvement seen by age 6 years, to an equal sex ratio, and to a normal head circumference. The children from Romania with autistic features tended to differ from the other Romanian adoptees with respect to a greater degree of cognitive impairment and a longer duration of severe psychological privation. Keywords: Autism, institutional care, psychological privation, cognitive impairment, preschool children, social deficits, repetitive behaviour, circumscribed interests, sensory preoccupations. Abbreviations: ADI-R: Autism Diagnostic Interview; ASQ: Autism Screening Question- naire; ERA: English and Romanian Adoptees; GCI: General Cognitive Index; ROC: receiver operating characteristics.
    [Show full text]