DOCSLIB.ORG

Vegetation Units Within the West Angelas Study Area Map D2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

667800 669600 671400 673200 ApEcTp ApEcTp ApEcTp ApEcTp ApEcTp ApTb ApTb EgKvPm ApEcTp ApTb ApEcTp 48 EgKvPm ! ApEcTp AaSlTp 92 SggGrTp ! SggGrTp K AaSlTp 0 0.25 0.5 AbPrIa AbPrIa Kilometres 1:15,000 LegendAbsolute Scale - 33 ! AaEm 7434000 Study Area ! 30 ApSgg EllEllTp Quadrat locations ! ApSgg Vegetation Units AaAc AaEffTp AaEm AaPoTp EgKvPmAaPoTt ApSgg ApSgg EllEllTp AaSaoTp AaTssp AaTp EllEllTp Tp ApSgg EllEllTp EllSggTw ElAmTssp AmGtTssp AmTw ApEcTp AaPoEpApTssp ExPnnTt EllEllTp AaTb EllEllTp EllEllTpSggTp AaSaoTp EllEllTp EgSggTb AaEm EllEllTp ApSgg EllEllTp EllSggTp EllEllTp ApSgg EllEllTp AaTt 7432200 AlAp PsTp SggAbTp SggIrTw Figure: 5.17 Drawn: CP Project ID: 1457 Date: 23/11/2012 Vegetation Units within the West Angelas Study Area Coordinate System Unique Map ID: CP153 Name: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Map D2 Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: GDA 1994 A3 673200 675000 676800 678600 ApEcTp ApEcTp 48 ! ApEcTp SggGrTp AaSlTpSggGrTp 102 ! SggGrTp AbPrIa Legend Study Area ! Quadrat locations 7434000 Vegetation Units AaAc AaEffTp 22 ! AaPoTp AbPrIa AaPoTt AaSaoTp 23 ! AaTssp 34 ! AaTp EllEllTp Tp EllSggTw ApSgg ElAmTssp AmTw AaEm 4 EllEllTp AaEm ! ApEcTp ApTssp EllEllTp ApSgg AaTb AbPrIa AaEm SggTp EgSggTb K EllSggTp EllEllTp 0 0.25 0.5 AaTt AaPoEp AlAp 7432200 Kilometres PsTp Absolute Scale - 1:15,000 SggAbTp SggIrTw Figure: 5.18 Drawn: CP Project ID: 1457 Date: 23/11/2012 Vegetation Units within the West Angelas Study Area Coordinate System Unique Map ID: CP153 Name: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Map D3 Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: GDA 1994 A3 685800 687600 689400 691200 !120 ChDllTt ApTb ApTb EgKvPm EgKvPm ApSgg EgKvPm EgKvPm ExPnnTt ApTb ApTb AmGtTssp EgKvPm EgKvPmChDllTt EgKvPm ApTb ApTb EgKvPm EgKvPm EgKvPm ! ChDllTt ApTb ChDllTt EgKvPm ApTb EgKvPm ChDllTt ChDllTt ChDllTt 124 ChDllTt ! ApTb ChDllTt ChDllTt AmGtTssp AbPrIa SggGrTp 111 AbPrIa ChDllTt! AbPrIa AbPrIa 113 ChDllTt 106 ! ExPnnTt AbPrIa ! AbPrIa AbPrIa AbPrIa SggGrTp AbPrIa ChDllTt SggGrTp AbPrIa AbPrIa ChDllTt AbPrIa 98 ! AaSlTp Legend SggGrTp 105 Study Area AaSlTp 110 ! ! 7434000 ! Quadrat locations 112 ! Vegetation Units ChDllTt AaAc 114 ! AaEffTp 46 AaAoAc 45 ! AaPoTp ! AaPoTt ApTb AaSaoTp AaTssp AaTp Tp EllSggTw PsAjs 108 ! AaSlTp ElAmTssp AmTw ApEcTp 51 52 ApTssp ! ! 119 AaTb ! EgKvPm SggTp EgSggTb EgKvPm EllSggTp 116 K ! EgKvPm AaTt 0 0.25 0.5 AaSlTp AlAp 7432200 PsTp Kilometres SggAbTp SggIrTw Absolute Scale - 1:15,000 Figure: 5.19 Drawn: CP Project ID: 1457 Date: 23/11/2012 Vegetation Units within the West Angelas Study Area Coordinate System Unique Map ID: CP153 Name: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Map D5 Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: GDA 1994 A3 689400 691200 693000 694800 ApSgg EgKvPm ApTb ApTb ApTb ApTb ApTb ApTb 123 EgKvPm ! 127 EgKvPmApTb EgKvPm ApTb ! 126 ApTb AmGtTssp ! ChDllTt ChDllTt EgKvPm ChDllTt 124 ! ApTb ChDllTt ApTb ApTb AbPrIa AmGtTssp 111 AbPrIa ChDllTt! 99 ApTb AbPrIa ! ChDllTt 106 ExPnnTt AbPrIa ! ApTb 107 ! 98 AaSlTp SggGrTp ! ApTb 109 ApTb AmGtTssp ! 105 Legend ! Study Area 7434000 112 ! 115 ! ! Quadrat locations ChDllTt Vegetation Units 114 ! AaAc AaEffTp ApTb AaPoTp AaPoTt PsAjs AaSaoTp AaTssp AaTp Tp EllSggTw ElAmTssp AmTw AaSlTp ApEcTp EgKvPm ApTssp AaTb SggTp 116 EgSggTb ! EgKvPm 117 118 ! EllSggTp ! EgKvPm K AaTt 7432200 0 0.25 0.5 AlAp Kilometres PsTp SggAbTp Absolute Scale - 1:15,000 SggIrTw Figure: 5.20 Drawn: CP Project ID: 1457 Date: 23/11/2012 Vegetation Units within the West Angelas Study Area Coordinate System Unique Map ID: CP153 Name: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Map D6 Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: GDA 1994 A3 Q_037 AmTw Q_038 Q_153 Q_136 Q_133 Q_002 Q_035 EllSggTw Q_156 Q_005 Q_057 Q_144 Q_132 SggIrTw Q_134 Q_143 Q_120 Q_146 Q_111 SggTp Q_112 Q_124 Q_126 Q_106 Q_142 Q_127 Q_140 Q_110 Q_149 ElAmTssp Q_040 Q_147 Q_105 Q_113 Q_056 Q_020 Q_058 Q_030 ApTssp Q_128 Q_125 Q_015 Q_036 Q_022 Tp Q_004 Q_160 Q_008 Q_092 Q_098 SggAbTp Q_100 Q_102 Q_006 Q_034 Q_023 Q_026 Q_027 Q_003 Q_103 Q_151 Q_011 EllSggTp Q_024 Q_152 Q_139 Q_017 Q_093 EgSggTb Q_122 Q_117 Q_119 Q_116 Q_108 Q_052 PsTp Q_051 Q_012 Q_047 Q_046 Q_045 Q_078 Q_009 Q_067 AaAc Q_064 Q_069 Q_089 Q_053 Q_063 Q_081 Q_049 Q_050 AaEcTp Q_200 Q_070 Q_029 Q_071 Q_044 Q_019 Q_041 Q_154 AaSaoTp Q_054 Q_080 Q_086 Q_010 Q_091 Q_077 Q_048 Q_018 AaTp Q_118 Q_115 Q_085 AaEffTp Q_065 Q_090 Q_082 Q_079 Q_060 AaTssp Q_059 Q_131 Q_042 Q_155 Q_121 Q_014 Q_016 Q_075 AaTb Q_028 Q_109 Q_107 Q_114 Q_074 Q_072 Q_025 Q_148 AaPoTp Q_033 Q_129 Q_141 Q_130 Q_087 Q_201 Q_097 Q_104 AaPoTt Q_043 Q_084 Q_096 Q_076 Q_007 Q_031 Q_099 Q_055 Q_123 Q_145 Q_138 AaTt Q_137 Q_135 Q_094 Q_062 Q_066 AlAp Q_095 Q_068 Q_061 Q_021 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Figure 5.21 ‐ Dendrogram of similarities between quadrats (SYSTAT) Rio Tinto Greater West Angelas Vegetation and Flora Assessment This page has been left blank intentionally. April 2013 102 Rio Tinto Greater West Angelas Vegetation and Flora Assessment 6 DISCUSSION The significance of the vegetation and flora of the Study Area has been assessed at four scales: national, state, regional and local. National significance refers to those features of the environment which are recognised under legislation as being of importance to the Australian community. Flora species and Threatened Ecological Communities (TECs) listed under the EPBC Act are regarded as nationally significant. State significance refers to those features of the environment that are recognised under state legislation as being of importance to the Western Australian community. It includes species that are listed as Threatened under the WC Act and TECs and PECs listed by the DEC, or vegetation which supports fauna of scheduled status. Regional significance addresses the representation of species and habitats at a biogeographical level. That is, species or habitat types that are endemic to the Hamersley sub‐region or whose distributions are limited or unknown are considered regionally significant. Vegetation and flora species are of local significance when their presence is confined to a very locallised area or a specialised habitat type that is not common in the local or regional contaxt and whose disturbance or removal may lead to local extinction. 6.1 FLORISTIC RICHNESS Species richness is a fundamental measurement of community and regional diversity (Gotelli and Colwell 2001). It is the simplest representation of species diversity (Magurran 1988, Fowler and Cohen 1990) and is the basic indicator of diversity used for this survey. April 2013 103 Rio Tinto Greater West Angelas Vegetation and Flora Assessment Table 6.1 compares the floristic inventory recorded during the current survey to that recorded in other quadrat‐based surveys conducted in the Pilbara. The most directly comparable survey was in 1998 of the Turee Study Area by ME Trudgen & Associates (1998) which was also a large scale survey. In ME Trudgen & Associates a larger area was survyed, encapusulating a greater range of habitats/landsystems which also resulted in a greater number of taxa recorded. A comparison of survey intensity with that of the remaining previous projects is difficult due to the differing scales of survey sizes. The survey intensity of the current study (0.85 quadrats/km2) is considered adequate to the area surveyed; which is reflected in the high number of taxa recorded for its scale. April 2013 104 Rio Tinto Greater West Angelas Vegetation and Flora Assessment Table 6.1 – A Comparison of Floristic Richness of Study Area with Nearby Studies Number Number Number Area Quadrats Study Site Date Surveyed Quadrats Taxa of Taxa/ (km2) /km2 Surveyed Recorded km2 Current study June‐August 2012 149 175 0.85 431 2.46 ME Trudgen & Associates May‐Aug 2011 ‐ 353 1998 ‐ 635 1.80 Biota 2010 May‐12 37 10 3.70 262 26.20 Rio Tinto 2010 April‐10 17 5 3.40 184 36.80 Biota 2006 May‐04 41 19 2.16 429 22.58 6.1.1 Flora of National Significance Lepidium catapycnon is the most significant taxon with regards to conservation status recorded within the current survey and is listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Descriptions of the EPBC Act vulnerability codes can be found in Appendix D. Fourteen other collection points are lodged at the West Australian Herbarium, located within Western Australia and in close proximity each other. Based on collections from the current survey, this taxon is not abundant within the West Angelas Study Area, with 29 individuals from four locations recorded, however further targeted surveys have the potential to expand the known population. There is one known location from within the conservation estate. Lepidium catapycnon appears to favour the outer edge of creek vegetation and rocky scree slopes that consist of orange‐brown (terracotta) coloured clay‐loam soil; and it is also favourable to areas where disturbance has exposed sub‐soils, particularly of the calcareous type. Thirteen other locations of Lepidium catapycnon occur regionally within 40 km of the Study Area, suggesting that the taxon is likely to occur elsewhere within the Study Area (Figure 5.9 and Table 2.8). The main threat to L. catapycnon is mining and exploration activities as its preferred habitat and the majority of recorded populations occur within mining and exploration tenements (Threatened Species Scientific Committee 2008). Processes which have been identified as potential threats to this species include roadworks, as it tends to prefer recently disturbed areas and colonises graded mining and exploration tracks (Threatened Species Scientific Committee 2008). The spread of the introduced species Ruby Dock (Acetosa vesicaria, which was also recorded within the Study Area) has been suggested to prevent establishment of this species in some areas (Threatened Species Scientific Committee 2008). 6.1.2 Flora of State Significance Lepidium catapycnon, as above, is listed as Threatened (formerly Declared Rare Flora) under the WC Act. 6.1.3 Flora of Regional Significance Thirteen Threatened and Priority Flora taxa were recorded by ecologia during the current survey: one Threatened (Lepidium catapycnon), three Priority 1 species (Aristida jerichoensis var.
Recommended publications
  • Additional Information

    Additional Information

    Current Survey Introduced Flora Records Vegetation Condition *Acetosa vesicaria Excellent 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000
  • Seed Ecology Iii

    Seed Ecology Iii

    SEED ECOLOGY III The Third International Society for Seed Science Meeting on Seeds and the Environment “Seeds and Change” Conference Proceedings June 20 to June 24, 2010 Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Editors: R. Pendleton, S. Meyer, B. Schultz Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Preface Extended abstracts included in this proceedings will be made available online. Enquiries and requests for hardcopies of this volume should be sent to: Dr. Rosemary Pendleton USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station Albuquerque Forestry Sciences Laboratory 333 Broadway SE Suite 115 Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 87102-3497 The extended abstracts in this proceedings were edited for clarity. Seed Ecology III logo designed by Bitsy Schultz. i June 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Table of Contents Germination Ecology of Dry Sandy Grassland Species along a pH-Gradient Simulated by Different Aluminium Concentrations.....................................................................................................................1 M Abedi, M Bartelheimer, Ralph Krall and Peter Poschlod Induction and Release of Secondary Dormancy under Field Conditions in Bromus tectorum.......................2 PS Allen, SE Meyer, and K Foote Seedling Production for Purposes of Biodiversity Restoration in the Brazilian Cerrado Region Can Be Greatly Enhanced by Seed Pretreatments Derived from Seed Technology......................................................4 S Anese, GCM Soares, ACB Matos, DAB Pinto, EAA da Silva, and HWM Hilhorst
  • The-Potential-Use-For-Groundwater

    The-Potential-Use-For-Groundwater

    i Professor Peter Cook 84 Richmond Avenue Colonel Light Gardens SA 5041 [email protected] Professor Derek Eamus School of Life Sciences University of Technology Sydney PO Box 123 Sydney NSW 2007 [email protected] Cover Photo: Open woodland vegetation in the Ti Tree Basin. ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 9 2. METHODOLOGIES TO INFER GROUNDWATER USE .......................................................... 11 2.1 Direct Measurements of Rooting Depth 11 2.2 Soil Water Potentials 12 2.3 Leaf and Soil Water Potentials 13 2.4 Stable Isotopes 2H and 18O 14 2.5 Depth of Water Use and Groundwater Access 16 2.6 Green Islands 17 2.7 Transpiration Rates 19 2.8 Tree Rings 20 2.9 Dendrometry 22 2.10 13C of Sapwood 22 3. GROUNDWATER AND VEGETATION IN THE TI TREE BASIN .............................................. 24 3.1 Geography and Climate 24 3.2 Groundwater Resources 27 3.3 Vegetation Across the Ti Tree Basin 29 4. TI TREE BASIN GDE STUDIES ............................................................................................. 32 4.1 Transpiration and Evapotranspiration Rates 32 4.2 Soil Water Potentials 35 4.3 Leaf Water Potentials 38 4.4 Stable Isotopes 43 4.5 Sapwood 13C and Leaf Vein Density 44 5. OTHER ARID ZONE STUDIES .............................................................................................
  • Handbook of Grasses, Treating of Their Structure, Classification

    Handbook of Grasses, Treating of Their Structure, Classification

    Young collector ."9' 910 JAN: W„HUTCHINSON ONE SEIinNG BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF HENRY W. SAGE 1891 ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY New York State Colleges OF Agriculture and Human Ecology AT Cornell University Cornell University Library QK 495.G74H97 1910 •'e''*'"9 Handbook of grasses, "UJimirn^' 3 1924 001 738 933 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924001738933 Poa annua, the Annual Meadow-grass ; flowering. This Book is now publislitd by GEORGE ALLEN' & UNWIN, LTD. Ruskiii House, 40, MUSEUM STREET, LONDON^ W.C. Poa anmia, the Annual Meadow-grassj floweidns HANDBOOK OF GRASSES TREATING OF THEIR STRUCTURE, CLASSIFICATION, GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION AND USES ALSO DESCRIBING THE BRITISH SPECIES AND THEIR HABITATS BY WILLIAM HUTCHINSON XonOon SONNENSCHEIN & CO., Lim. , SWAN New York : THE MACMILLAN CO. igio Edition, March iSgg; Third Edition igob; First Edition, SeftembeiiSgs; Second Fourth Edition, igio. PREFACE Grasses are in three respects a remarkable family : they possess many structural peculiarities which sharply define them from all other kinds of plants ; they are so abundant and widely diffused as to constitute the dominant feature of the landscape, not only in our own, but in most other coun- tries j and lastly, no other Order can at all compare with the Gramineffi in the variety and magnitude of their uses. Yet the study of grasses, so far from being popular, is shunned by many botanists in the belief that it is beset with unusual difficulties ; farmers and graziers, to whom the cereal and forage grasses are all in all, have rarely a scientific acquaintance with them ; while those observers of Nature, not particularly iriterested in either botany or agriculture, are hardly able to recognize two or three among the many species which everywhere abound.
  • Climate Teleconnections Synchronize Picea Glauca Masting and Fire Disturbance: Evidence for a Fire‐Related Form of Environmental Prediction

    Climate Teleconnections Synchronize Picea Glauca Masting and Fire Disturbance: Evidence for a Fire‐Related Form of Environmental Prediction

    Received: 9 August 2019 | Accepted: 7 October 2019 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13308 RESEARCH ARTICLE Climate teleconnections synchronize Picea glauca masting and fire disturbance: Evidence for a fire‐related form of environmental prediction Davide Ascoli1 | Andrew Hacket‐Pain2 | Jalene M. LaMontagne3 | Adrián Cardil4 | Marco Conedera5 | Janet Maringer5 | Renzo Motta1 | Ian S. Pearse6 | Giorgio Vacchiano7 1Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Italy; 2Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; 3Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA; 4Department of Crops and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain; 5Insubric Ecosystems, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Cadenazzo, Switzerland; 6Fort Collins Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO, USA and 7Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Correspondence Davide Ascoli Abstract Email: [email protected] 1. Synchronous pulses of seed masting and natural disturbance have positive feed- Funding information backs on the reproduction of masting species in disturbance-prone ecosystems. Natural Environment Research Council, We test the hypotheses that disturbances and proximate causes of masting are Grant/Award Number: NE/S007857/1; NSF, Grant/Award Number: DEB-1745496 correlated, and that their large-scale synchrony is driven by similar climate tel- econnection patterns at both inter-annual and decadal time scales. Handling Editor: Peter Bellingham 2. Hypotheses were tested on white spruce (Picea glauca), a masting species which surprisingly persists in fire-prone boreal forests while lacking clear fire adap- tations. We built masting, drought and fire indices at regional (Alaska, Yukon, Alberta, Quebec) and sub-continental scales (western North America) spanning the second half of the 20th century.
  • Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records

    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records

    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q A Records plants monocots Poaceae Paspalidium rarum C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida latifolia feathertop wiregrass C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida lazaridis C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Astrebla pectinata barley mitchell grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus setigerus Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Echinochloa colona awnless barnyard grass Y 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida polyclados C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cymbopogon ambiguus lemon grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria ctenantha C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enteropogon ramosus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon avenaceus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eragrostis tenellula delicate lovegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Urochloa praetervisa C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Heteropogon contortus black speargrass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Iseilema membranaceum small flinders grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Bothriochloa ewartiana desert bluegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Brachyachne convergens common native couch C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon lindleyanus C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon polyphyllus leafy nineawn C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus actinocladus katoora grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus pennisetiformis Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus australasicus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne pulchella subsp. dominii C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Dichanthium sericeum subsp. humilius C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria divaricatissima var. divaricatissima C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne mucronata forma (Alpha C.E.Hubbard 7882) C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sehima nervosum C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eulalia aurea silky browntop C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Chloris virgata feathertop rhodes grass Y 1/1 CODES I - Y indicates that the taxon is introduced to Queensland and has naturalised.
  • DRAFT 25/10/90; Plant List Updated Oct. 1992; Notes Added June 2021

    DRAFT 25/10/90; Plant List Updated Oct. 1992; Notes Added June 2021

    DRAFT 25/10/90; plant list updated Oct. 1992; notes added June 2021. PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION VALUES OF OPEN COUNTRY PADDOCK, BOOLARDY STATION Allan H. Burbidge and J.K. Rolfe INTRODUCTION Boolardy Station is situated about 150 km north of Yalgoo and 140 km west-north-west of Cue, in the Shire of Murchison, Western Australia. Open Country Paddock (about 16 000 ha) is in the south-east corner of the station, at 27o05'S, 116o50'E. The most prominent named feature is Coolamooka Hill, near the eastern boundary of the paddock. There are no conservation reserves in this region, although there are some small reserves set aside for various other purposes. Previous biological data for the station consist of broad scale vegetation mapping and land system mapping. Beard (1976) mapped the entire Murchison region at 1: 1 000 000. The Open Country Paddock area was mapped as supporting mulga woodlands and shrublands. More detailed mapping of land system units for rangeland assessment purposes has been carried out more recently at a scale of 1: 40 000 (Payne and Curry in prep.). Seven land systems were identified in open Country Paddock (Fig. 1). Apart from these studies, no detailed biological survey work appears to have been done in the area. Open Country Paddock has been only lightly grazed by domestic stock because of the presence of Kite-leaf Poison (Gastrolobium laytonii) and a lack of fresh water. Because of this and the generally good condition of the paddock and presence of a wide range of plant species, P.J.
  • Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands

    Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands

    Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands: Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources by the Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre Anita Smyth Anthea Coggan Famiza Yunus Russell Gorddard Stuart Whitten Jocelyn Davies Nic Gambold Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards Rob Brandle Mike Fleming John Read June 2007 Copyright and Disclaimers © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Contributing author information Anita Smyth: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Anthea Coggan: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Famiza Yunus: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Russell Gorddard: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Stuart Whitten: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Jocelyn Davies: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Nic Gambold: Central Land Council Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards: Ngaanyatjarra Council Rob Brandle: South Austalia Department for Environment and Heritage Mike Fleming: South Australia Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation John Read: BHP Billiton Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 18 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source.
  • By H.D.V. PRENDERGAST a Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University. January 1

    By H.D.V. PRENDERGAST a Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University. January 1

    STRUCTURAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL RELATIONSHIPS IN AUSTRALIAN c4 GRASSES (POACEAE) • by H.D.V. PRENDERGAST A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University. January 1987. Canberra, Australia. i STATEMENT This thesis describes my own work which included collaboration with Dr N .. E. Stone (Taxonomy Unit, R .. S .. B.S .. ), whose expertise in enzyme assays enabled me to obtain comparative information on enzyme activities reported in Chapters 3, 5 and 7; and with Mr M.. Lazarides (Australian National Herbarium, c .. s .. r .. R .. O .. ), whose as yet unpublished taxonomic views on Eragrostis form the basis of some of the discussion in Chapter 3. ii This thesis describes the results of research work carried out in the Taxonomy Unit, Research School of Biological Sciences, The Australian National University during the tenure of an A.N.U. Postgraduate Scholarship. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My time in the Taxonomy Unit has been a happy one: I could not have asked for better supervision for my project or for a more congenial atmosphere in which to work. To Dr. Paul Hattersley, for his help, advice, encouragement and friendship, I owe a lot more than can be said in just a few words: but, Paul, thanks very much! To Mr. Les Watson I owe as much for his own support and guidance, and for many discussions on things often psittacaceous as well as graminaceous! Dr. Nancy Stone was a kind teacher in many days of enzyme assays and Chris Frylink a great help and friend both in and out of the lab •• Further thanks go to Mike Lazarides (Australian National Herbarium, c.s.I.R.O.) for identifying many grass specimens and for unpublished data on infrageneric groups in Eragrostis; Dr.
  • Northwest Highlands Bioregion Technical Descriptions

    Northwest Highlands Bioregion Technical Descriptions

    Department of Environment and Science Regional Ecosystem Technical Descriptions Technical descriptions provide a detailed description of the full range in structure and floristic composition of regional ecosystems (e.g. 1.1.10) and their component vegetation communities (e.g. 1.11.10a, 1.11.10b). The descriptions are compiled using site survey data from the Queensland Herbarium’s CORVEG database. Distribution maps, representative images (if available) and the pre-clearing and remnant area (hectares) of each vegetation community derived from the regional ecosystem mapping (spatial) data are included. The technical descriptions should be used in conjunction with the fields from the regional ecosystem description database (REDD) for a full description of the regional ecosystem. Quantitative site data from relatively undisturbed sites are extracted from CORVEG and summarized to provide information specific to each vegetation community. Technical descriptions include the attributes: tree canopy height and cover and native plant species composition of the predominant layer, which are used to assess the remnant status of vegetation under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. However, as technical descriptions reflect the full range in structure and floristic composition across the climatic, natural disturbance and geographic range of the regional ecosystem, local reference sites should be used where possible (Neldner et al. 2005 section 3.3.3). The technical descriptions are subject to review and are updated as additional data becomes available.
  • Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park

    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park

    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park Hiltaba Pastoral Lease and Gawler Ranges National Park, South Australia Survey conducted: 12 to 22 Nov 2012 Report submitted: 22 May 2013 P.J. Lang, J. Kellermann, G.H. Bell & H.B. Cross with contributions from C.J. Brodie, H.P. Vonow & M. Waycott SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes Bush Blitz – Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges NP, November 2012 Report submitted to Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study: 22 May 2013. Published online on http://data.environment.sa.gov.au/: 25 Nov. 2016. ISBN 978-1-922027-49-8 (pdf) © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resouces, South Australia, 2013. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, images, and other material or devices protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, this report is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. All other rights are reserved. This report should be cited as: Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1, 2, Bell, G.H.1 & Cross, H.B.1, 2, 3 (2013). Flora survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park: vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes. Report for Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1State Herbarium of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
  • Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales

    Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales

    Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp.