Evidence for Multiple, Autoploid Origins of Agamospermous Populations in Eupatorium Sessilifolium (Asteraceae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evidence for Multiple, Autoploid Origins of Agamospermous Populations in Eupatorium Sessilifolium (Asteraceae) Plant Syst Evol DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0155-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evidence for multiple, autoploid origins of agamospermous populations in Eupatorium sessilifolium (Asteraceae) Kunsiri C. Grubbs Æ Randall L. Small Æ Edward E. Schilling Received: 14 October 2008 / Accepted: 25 January 2009 Ó Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract Comparative analyses were made of agamo- uncommon suggest that monitoring of populations might spermous populations of Eupatorium sessilifolium, which be warranted to evaluate whether measures are needed to have previously been documented to be polyploid, to enhance their continued survival. determine whether they are alloploid or autoploid in origin and to assess the possibility that they have arisen more than Keywords Eupatorium Á Asteraceae Á Autoploid Á once. There was no variability in ITS sequences among Polyploidy Á ITS Á ISSR seven agamospermous and eight sexual diploid populations of E. sessilifolium, which is consistent with morphological observations in suggesting that the agamospermous popu- Introduction lations were autoploids. The ITS sequence characteristic of E. sessilifolium differs from all other North American A distinctive aspect of North American Eupatorium L. is species by a minimum of 15 changes, and heterogeneity or the widespread presence of agamospermy, which in this polymorphism would be expected if the agamospermous genus is always associated with polyploidy (Sullivan populations were alloploids. Analysis of the chloroplast- 1972). In some cases, there are groups of polyploid pop- based trnC-psbM spacer region showed variability among ulations that are morphologically distinct from any diploid, both sexual diploid and agamospermous populations of and have been recognized as taxonomically distinct. E. sessilifolium, which suggested that the agamospermous Examples for which genomic relationships have been populations stem from multiple origins. Analysis of ISSR established include E. godfreyanum Cronquist (Siripun and data revealed considerable intraspecific variability within Schilling 2006a) and E. novae-angliae (Fernald) V. I. E. sessilifolium, and the distribution of variability, with Sullivan ex A. Haines and Sorrie (Schilling et al. 2007). agamospermous populations showing variability from one Other groups of polyploid populations are morphologically another, added further evidence for multiple origins of indistinguishable from associated sexual diploid popula- agamospermous populations. The results in conjunction tions and have been considered to be conspecific with with distributional evidence that the sexual diploid popu- them. Examples include E. altissimum L., E. rotundifolium lations of E. sessilifolium are geographically restricted and L., and E. sessilifolium L. (Sullivan 1976). There are, however, still questions regarding whether the polyploids within a species are auto- or alloploid in origin, and whe- K. C. Grubbs ther they have single or multiple origins. Previous work Department of Science, Kasetsart University, that attempted to address these questions using flavonoids Kamphangsaen Campus, Kamphangsaen, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand or isozymes (e.g. Sullivan 1972; Yahara and Sullivan 1986; Yahara et al. 1991) utilized markers that were not capable R. L. Small Á E. E. Schilling (&) of decisively resolving among the alternatives. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Independent origins of polyploidy have been docu- University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA mented in various groups, and in fact form a recurrent e-mail: [email protected] theme where this has been investigated closely (Soltis et al. 123 K. C. Grubbs et al. 2003). For apomicts, though, the contrasting situation has geographical area in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, sometimes been documented in which large numbers and the species is represented by agamospermous, poly- of populations may form essentially a single clone ploid (triploid where chromosome counts are available, (Hollingsworth and Bailey 2000; Poulin et al. 2005;Xu Grant 1953; Montgomery and Fairbrothers 1970; Sullivan et al. 2003). The generally low levels of variation for DNA 1976) populations across the rest of its range. Other than sequence data have suggested that divergence in Eupato- the differences in presence or absence of viable pollen, the rium in eastern North America may be relatively recent polyploids are indistinguishable both morphologically and (Siripun and Schilling 2006a), so it is possible that apo- by flavonoid chemistry (Sullivan 1972) from the diploids. mictic populations within species of Eupatorium may be This information suggests that the agamospermous popu- relatively recent invaders of disturbed habitats that could lations of E. sessilifolium are autopolyploid. Hybridization stem from single origins. within Eupatorium is frequent, however, and hybrids or Eupatorium sessilifolium is a morphologically uniform hybrid-derived apomicts are known between E. sessilifo- species that occupies a relatively wide range in eastern lium and several other species, including E. rotundifolium North America (Sullivan 1972; Siripun and Schilling (Siripun and Schilling 2006a), E. perfoliatum L. (Sullivan 2006b; Fig. 1). It is distinguished from other members of 1972), and E. petaloideum Britton, and E. hyssopifolium L. the genus by its glabrous stems, and leaves that are sessile, (Schilling, unpublished data). Thus, it is also possible that truncate, relatively long (7–15 cm), and pinnately nerved. the polyploid populations of E. sessilifolium were derived Sullivan (1972; 1976) documented that diploid, sexual via hybridization and are allopolyploid without this being populations are found only in a relatively restricted reflected in the morphology or chemistry. Fig. 1 Map of eastern North America showing the distribution range approximate sources of populations sampled for molecular data, of Eupatorium sessilifolium (solid line) with the documented range numbered as in Table 1 (circles sexual diploid populations, triangles of the diploid populations (stippled areas); enlargement shows agamospermous polyploid populations) 123 Evidence for multiple, autoploid origins of agamospermous populations In this study we employed three different molecular Materials and methods approaches to examine the relationships of diploid and polyploid populations of E. sessilifolium. Two primary Sources of plant material questions were addressed: (1) are the polyploid populations of E. sessilifolium allo- or autoploid in origin, and (2) are Samples of E. sessilifolium were collected from field the polyploid populations the result of a single or multiple populations in the southeastern USA in the area where both origins? Each of the three data sets provides unique sexual diploid and agamospermous polyploid populations insights into these questions. have been documented previously (Table 1; Fig. 1). At Previous studies of ITS sequence variation in Eupato- each site, multiple individuals were sampled. Ploidy level rium have shown that each diploid species has a unique ITS and type of reproduction of populations was inferred from sequence type and that little intraspecific variation exists the presence or absence of pollen coupled with the pres- (Siripun and Schilling 2006a; Schilling et al. 2007). ence of filled cypselae. Sullivan (1972, 1976) demonstrated Further, studies of allopolyploid species and hybrids in the absolute correlation within Eupatorium between male Eupatorium have shown that ITS sequence types repre- sterility and polyploidy, and the further correlation between sentative of all parents are maintained in allopolyploid and polyploidy and agamospermy, and the presence of uni- hybrid individuals (Siripun and Schilling 2006a; Schilling formly filled cypselae in heads in which the flowers lacked et al. 2007). We used ITS sequence data to determine not only pollen but also anthers provided further evidence whether polyploid E. sessilifolium populations were of of their agamospermous nature. Measurements were made allo- or autoploid origin. If polyploid E. sessilifolium of a number of characters (leaf length and width, phyllary populations are of alloploid origin then we expected to length and width; corolla length, cypsela and pappus detect multiple different ITS sequence types within indi- length) for comparisons. viduals. Alternatively, if E. sessilifolium populations are of autoploid origin then we expected to obtain a single ITS Isolation of DNA sequence type. Because chloroplast DNA is maternally inherited DNA samples were extracted principally from young (Sullivan et al. 1991), phylogenetic analyses of cpDNA leaves with the CTAB protocol of Doyle and Doyle (1987). sequences are expected to reflect only maternal lineages To decrease the interference from phenolic compounds, and can be used to address the issue of single versus DNA extractions were cleaned up using the Wizard Kit multiple origins of polyploids. If polyploid E. sessilifoli- protocol (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The purified DNA um originated once then we expect all polyploid extracts were quantified and the concentrations were populations to have a single cpDNA sequence type (if no adjusted to 25–100 ng/ll. mutations have occurred subsequent to polyploid forma- tion), or to form a monophyletic group relative to sampled Molecular methods diploid populations. Alternatively, if polyploid E. sessi- lifolium populations have arisen through multiple origins For ITS sequence studies, only one individual from each then we expect different polyploid populations to have population
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Abstract Oak Openings
    Oak Openings CommunityOak Openings,Abstract Page 1 Historical Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Photo by Michael A. Kost Absent or likely absent Overview: Oak openings is a fire-dependent, savanna climatic tension zone. In the 1800s, oak openings were type dominated by oaks, having between 10 and located in the south-central Lower Peninsula of Michigan 60% canopy, with or without a shrub layer. The on sandy glacial outwash and coarse-textured moraines predominantly graminoid ground layer is composed (Wing 1937, Comer et al. 1995, NatureServe 2004). Oak of species associated with both prairie and forest openings occurred within the range of bur oak plains communities. Oak openings are found on dry-mesic and oak barrens, with oak openings dominating more on loams and occur typically on level to rolling topography dry-mesic to mesic soils, bur oak plains occupying more of outwash and coarse-textured end moraines. Oak mesic, flat sites in the southwestern part of the Lower openings have been nearly extirpated from Michigan; Peninsula, and oak barrens thriving on droughty sites. only two small examples have been documented. These similar oak savanna types often graded into each other. Oak openings were historically documented in Global and State Rank: G1/S1 the following counties: Allegan, Barry, Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, Clinton, Eaton, Genesee, Hillsdale, Range: Oak savanna1 and prairie communities reached Ingham, Ionia, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Kent, Lapeer, their maximum coverage in Michigan approximately Lenawee, Livingston, Macomb, Montcalm, Monroe, 4,000-6,000 years ago, when post-glacial climatic Newaygo, Oakland, Ottawa, Shiawassee, St. Joseph, Van conditions were comparatively warm and dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Desmodium Cuspidatum (Muhl.) Loudon Large-Bracted Tick-Trefoil
    New England Plant Conservation Program Desmodium cuspidatum (Muhl.) Loudon Large-bracted Tick-trefoil Conservation and Research Plan for New England Prepared by: Lynn C. Harper Habitat Protection Specialist Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Westborough, Massachusetts For: New England Wild Flower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508/877-7630 e-mail: [email protected] • website: www.newfs.org Approved, Regional Advisory Council, 2002 SUMMARY Desmodium cuspidatum (Muhl.) Loudon (Fabaceae) is a tall, herbaceous, perennial legume that is regionally rare in New England. Found most often in dry, open, rocky woods over circumneutral to calcareous bedrock, it has been documented from 28 historic and eight current sites in the three states (Vermont, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts) where it is tracked by the Natural Heritage programs. The taxon has not been documented from Maine. In Connecticut and Rhode Island, the species is reported but not tracked by the Heritage programs. Two current sites in Connecticut are known from herbarium specimens. No current sites are known from Rhode Island. Although secure throughout most of its range in eastern and midwestern North America, D. cuspidatum is Endangered in Vermont, considered Historic in New Hampshire, and watch-listed in Massachusetts. It is ranked G5 globally. Very little is understood about the basic biology of this species. From work on congeners, it can be inferred that there are likely to be no problems with pollination, seed set, or germination. As for most legumes, rhizobial bacteria form nitrogen-fixing nodules on the roots of D. cuspidatum. It is unclear whether there have been any changes in the numbers or distribution of rhizobia capable of forming effective mutualisms with D.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Species List For: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species
    Species List for: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location NA List NA Nomination and subsequent visits Jefferson County Glade Complex NA List from Gass, Wallace, Priddy, Chmielniak, T. Smith, Ladd & Glore, Bogler, MPF Hikes 9/24/80, 10/2/80, 7/10/85, 8/8/86, 6/2/87, 1986, and 5/92 WGNSS Lists Webster Groves Nature Study Society Fieldtrip Jefferson County Glade Complex Participants WGNSS Vascular Plant List maintained by Steve Turner Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Aesculus glabra var. undetermined Ohio buckeye Sapindaceae 5 -1 Agalinis skinneriana (Gerardia) midwestern gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Allium canadense var. mobilense wild garlic Liliaceae 7 5 Allium canadense var. undetermined wild garlic Liliaceae 2 3 Allium cernuum wild onion Liliaceae 8 5 Allium stellatum wild onion Liliaceae 6 5 * Allium vineale field garlic Liliaceae 0 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia bidentata lanceleaf ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 4 Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 -1 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Amorpha canescens lead plant Fabaceae/Faboideae 8 5 Amphicarpaea bracteata hog peanut Fabaceae/Faboideae 4 0 Andropogon gerardii var.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List for Scheier Natural Area - Fluvanna County Plant List Compiled by Glenn Metzler and Tom Dierauf in Late Summer 2001
    Plant List for Scheier Natural Area - Fluvanna County Plant list compiled by Glenn Metzler and Tom Dierauf in late summer 2001. This list is from a single season observation only and is not comprehensive. Club Mosses Lycopodiaceae Lycopodium digitatum running cedar Lycopodium obscurum ground pine Ferns and Fern Allies Ophioglossaceae Botrychium dissectum grapefern Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea cinnamon fern Osmunda regalis fern, royal Polypodiaceae Asplenium platyneuron spleenwort, ebony Athyrium asplenioides southern lady fern Dryopteris cristata shield-fern,crested Woodwardia areolata netted chain fern Onoclea sensibilis sensitive fern Polystichum acrostichoides fern,christmas Pteridium aquilinum fern,bracken Thelypteris noveboracensis new york fern Dennstaedtia punctilobula hay-scented fern Conifers Cupressaceae Juniperus virginiana cedar,eastern red Pinaceae Pinus echinata short-leaved pine Pinus strobus white pine Pinus taeda loblolly pine Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Monocots Araceae Arisaema triphyllum jack-in-the-pulpit Commelinaceae Commelina diffusa dayflower,spreading Cyperaceae Carex crinita sedge Carex lurida sedge,shallow Carex intumescens sedge Carex plantaginea? sedge Cyperus strigosus sedge Rhynchospora capitellata? beak rush Scirpus atrovirens bulrush,green Scirpus cyperinus woolgrass Scirpus polyphyllus bulrush,leafy Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea villosa yam,yellow Juncaceae Juncus effusus common rush Juncus tenuis path rush Liliaceae Medeola virginiana indian cucumber root Polygonatum biflorum solomon's-seal,small Smilax
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sustainability Will Probably Always Be Limited by Its Small Size and Fragmented Condition (See Section 3.5)
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2011 Terrestrial Species Viability Evaluation for The Uwharrie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Requirements in the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) ............................. 1 3.0 Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Spatial Scales for Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 4 3.2 Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 7 3.3 Range of Variation .................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Current Condition and Trend of Ecosystem Characteristics and Status of Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 15 3.5 – Risks to Selected Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................... 20 3.6 Recommended Forest Plan Components ............................................................... 21 3.7 Assessing effects of Forest Plan alternatives on viability ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited By
    New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited by: Stephen M. Young and Troy W. Weldy This list is also published at the website: www.nynhp.org For more information, suggestions or comments about this list, please contact: Stephen M. Young, Program Botanist New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 518-402-8951 Fax 518-402-8925 E-mail: [email protected] To report sightings of rare species, contact our office or fill out and mail us the Natural Heritage reporting form provided at the end of this publication. The New York Natural Heritage Program is a partnership with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and by The Nature Conservancy. Major support comes from the NYS Biodiversity Research Institute, the Environmental Protection Fund, and Return a Gift to Wildlife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... Page ii Why is the list published? What does the list contain? How is the information compiled? How does the list change? Why are plants rare? Why protect rare plants? Explanation of categories.................................................................................................................... Page iv Explanation of Heritage ranks and codes............................................................................................ Page iv Global rank State rank Taxon rank Double ranks Explanation of plant
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Oak Savanna
    Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model The Rapid Assessment is a component of the LANDFIRE project. Reference condition models for the Rapid Assessment were created through a series of expert workshops and a peer-review process in 2004 and 2005. For more information, please visit www.landfire.gov. Please direct questions to [email protected]. Potential Natural Vegetation Group (PNVG) R6NOKS Northern Oak Savanna General Information Contributors (additional contributors may be listed under "Model Evolution and Comments") Modelers Reviewers James Merzenich [email protected] David Cleland [email protected] Donald Dickman [email protected] Vegetation Type General Model Sources Rapid AssessmentModel Zones Woodland Literature California Pacific Northwest Local Data Great Basin South Central Dominant Species* Expert Estimate Great Lakes Southeast Northeast S. Appalachians QUAL CORY LANDFIRE Mapping Zones SCHIZ Northern Plains Southwest QUMA 41 51 SONU N-Cent.Rockies QUVE 49 52 ANGE 50 Geographic Range Northern oak savanna occurs in a complex, shifting mosaic with oak woodlands, barrens and prairies in the upper Midwest. This type occurs in southern Lower Michigan, northwestern Ohio, northern Indiana, northeastern Illinois, southern Wisconsin, and southeastern to northwestern Minnesota. This savanna/woodland/prairie type historically occurred as an ecotone between mesic hardwood forest and tallgrass prairie. Biophysical Site Description Northern oak savanna occurs primarily on level to rolling topography of glacial outwash plains, coarse- textured end moraines, and steep ice-contact features (Chapman 1984, Albert 1995, Cohen 2001, Michigan Natural Features Inventory 2003, Cohen 2004, NatureServe 2004). Soils are well-drained, moderately- fertile sands, loamy sands, sandy loams, and loams with medium-acid to neutral pH (5.6 to 7.3) and low water retaining capacity (Chapman 1984, Michigan Natural Features Inventory 2003, NatureServe 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Native Plants for Landscape Use in Kentucky
    Chapter 4 Native Plants for Landscape Use In Kentucky A publication of the Louisville Water Company Wellhead Protection Plan, Phase III Source Reduction Grant # X9-96479407-0 Chapter 4 Native Plants for Landscape Use in Kentucky Native Wildflowers and Ferns The U. S. Department of Transportation, (US DOT), has developed a listing of native plants, (ferns, annuals, perennials, shrubs, and trees), that may be used in landscaping in the State of Kentucky. Other agencies have also developed listings of native plants, which have been integrated into the list within this guidebook. While this list is, by no means, a complete report of the native species that may be found in Kentucky, it offers a starting point for additional research, should the homeowner wish to find additional KY native plants for use in a landscape design, or to check if a plant is native to the State. A reference book titled Wildflowers and Ferns of Kentucky, which was recommended by personnel at the Salato Wildlife Center as an excellent reference for native plants, was also used to develop the list. (A full bibliography is listed at the end of this chapter.) While many horticultural and botanical experts may dispute the inclusion of specific plants on the listing, or wish to add more plants, the list represents the latest information available for research, by the amateur, at the time. The information listed within the list was taken at face value, and no judgment calls were made about the suitability of plants for the list. The author makes no claims as to the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of this list.
    [Show full text]