CHILD CARE CENTERS and SMALL GROUP HOMES by ZIP CODE
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Index 1 INDEX
Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio -
Childcare Facilities Friday, September 3, 2021
Childcare Facilities Friday, September 3, 2021 County APACHE Total = 14 Sub-Type : CHILD CARE CENTER License # Name Contact Information License/Approval Dates CDC-18915 KINGDOM KIDS LEARNING CENTER Tele: (928)226-7178 08/31/2020 to 07/31/2023 3926 SOUTH WALAPAI DRIVE Fax: ( ) - Capacity : 50 FLAGSTAFF AZ 86005 License # Name Contact Information License/Approval Dates CDC-18031 N.A.C.O.G. - ROUND VALLEY HEAD START Tele: (928)774-9504 08/01/2020 to 07/31/2023 940 EAST MARICOPA DRIVE UNIT B Fax: (928)779-0514 Capacity : 59 SPRINGERVILLE AZ 85938 License # Name Contact Information License/Approval Dates CDC-14567 N.A.C.O.G. - ST. JOHNS HEAD START Tele: (928)337-4211 01/01/2021 to 12/31/2023 601 WEST CLEVELAND STREET Fax: (928)779-0514 Capacity : 45 ST JOHNS AZ 85936 Sub-Type : CHILD CARE PUBLIC SCHOOL License # Name Contact Information License/Approval Dates CDC-6586 C.E.S.D.#6 - CONCHO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Tele: (928)337-4665 05/01/2021 to 04/30/2024 HIGHWAY 61 AND CINDER RD Fax: (928)337-2455 Capacity : 52 CONCHO AZ 85924 License # Name Contact Information License/Approval Dates CDC-17786 C.U.S.D.#24 - CANYON DE CHELLY Tele: (928)674-9200 01/01/2020 to 12/31/2022 HWY 191 Fax: ( ) - Capacity : 20 CHINLE AZ 86503 Childcare Facilities Friday, September 3, 2021 County APACHE Total = 14 Sub-Type : CHILD CARE PUBLIC SCHOOL License # Name Contact Information License/Approval Dates CDC-16351 C.U.S.D.#24 - CHINLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRE SCHOOL Tele: (928)674-9300 12/01/2018 to 11/30/2021 US HIGHWAY 191 NAVAJO ROUTE 7 Fax: (928)674-9399 Capacity : 120 -
A Proposal to Conduct a Water Resouces
AN ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, KANE AND TWO MILE RANCHES, EASTERN ARIZONA STRIP: 30 SEPTEMBER 2005 DRAFT FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Stevens Ecological Consulting, LLC P.O. Box 1315 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 [email protected] Prepared for: Grand Canyon Wildlands Council, Inc. P.O. Box 1594 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 (928) 556-9306 [email protected] For submission to: The Grand Canyon Trust Attn: Mr. Ethan Aumack N. Ft. Valley Rd. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 [email protected] 30 September 2005 GCWC DRAFT FINAL GCT WATER RESOURCES REPORT - 30 SEPT. 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables List of Figures List of Appendices Acknowledgements Executive Summary Introduction Project Tasks Task 1: Existing data on water resources distribution and study site selection Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Task 2: Historical Land Use of the Eastern Arizona Strip – Kim Crumbo Prehistory Exploration and Settlement Grand Canyon Game Preserve Logging Grazing Task 3: Arial Reconnaissance of the Eastern Arizona Strip Introduction Recommendations Task 4: Field site visits Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Task 5: Water resources assessment and recommendations Introduction Methods Results and Discussion General Recommendations Site-specific Recommendations References Cited Appendices 1 GCWC DRAFT FINAL GCT WATER RESOURCES REPORT - 30 SEPT. 2005 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Water resource site scoring and ranking criteria Table 1.2: Primary (*) and alternate sites used for inventory in 2005 Table 3.1: Several apparently -
Fulfilling Our Commitments to Children & Communities
Fulfilling Our Commitments to Children & Communities State Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Report 1 Dear Fellow Arizonans: Certainly, 2020 has been a year of extraordinary challenges for many individuals, families and communities throughout our state. While it is easy to focus on the difficulties and disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to remember the many heroic individuals and organizations who rose to the challenge and were instrumental in moving our state forward. As a human service agency, we are proud of the role that First Things First (FTF) and its many partners played in ensuring crucial early childhood programs were able to continue during the crisis or, if temporarily shuttered, have the resources to quickly restart when it is safe to do so (see Special Report on pages 6 to 15). From getting critical supplies to child care providers in the early days of the shutdown to helping programs find innovative ways to continue safely serving families, FTF fulfilled its commitment to ensuring that the programs families have come to count on to support their children’s development, health and learning did not fall victim to the virus that ravaged our state and our nation. At the same time, we are keenly aware that this crisis has only exacerbated the challenges facing Arizona’s young children. As the data on pages 17 to 19 of this report clearly show, even before the pandemic, young children in Arizona faced high hurdles on the road toward school readiness. For example: • 1 in 4 young children live in poverty. • Almost 3 out of 5 children don’t attend preschool. -
Mountain Goats in the Greater Yellowstone Area: Challenges for Management, Wildlife Society Bulletin, July 10, 2016
EXHIBIT INDEX BATES # DOCUMENT Ex001 - Robin J. Innes, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain 056 Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Oreamnos americanus, Fire Effects Information System (2011), Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (last visited August 8, 2017) Ex057 - Elizabeth Flesh et al., Range Expansion and Population Growth of Nonnative 066 Mountain Goats in the Greater Yellowstone Area: Challenges for Management, Wildlife Society Bulletin, July 10, 2016 Ex067 - Rolf Johnson, Washington Dept. of Game, Mountain Goats and Mountain Sheep 081 of Washington, January 1983 (excerpt) Ex082 - Clifford Rice & Don Gay, Effects of Mountain Goat Harvest on Historic and 100 Contemporary Populations, 91 Northwestern Naturalist 40 (2010) Ex101 - Bureau of Land Management, Status of the Science on Questions that Relate to 112 BLM Plan Amendment Decisions and Peninsular Ranges Bighorn Sheep (2001) Ex113 - Craig A. Stockwell & Gary C. Bateman, Conflicts in National Parks: A Case 124 Study of Helicopters and Bighorn Sheep Time Budgets at the Grand Canyon, 56 Biological Conservation 317 (1991) Ex125 - Steeve D. Cote, Mountain Goat Responses to Helicopter Disturbance, 24(4) 130 Wildlife Society Bulletin 681 (1996) Ex131 - Alexandre L. Rasiulis et al., The Effect of Radio-Collar Weight on Survival of 135 Migratory Caribou, 78(5) The Journal of Wildlife Management 953 (2014) Ex136 - Steven J. Cooke et al., Troubling issues at the frontier of animal tracking for 138 conservation and management, 00 Conservation Biology 0, 1 (2017) Ex139 - National Park Service, Olympic Nat’l Park, Draft Mountain Goat Management 166 Plan / Environmental Impact Statement (2017) (excerpt) Ex167 - National Park Service, Olympic Nat’l Park, Olympic National Park Minimum 192 Requirements Analysis, 2017 Ex193 - U.S. -
Vermilion Cliffs National Monument Resource Management Plan (Approved Plan) Is Complete
United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Arizona Strip Field Office 345 East Riverside Drive In Reply Refer To: AZ-010: 1610 St. George, Utah 84790 www.az.blm.gov February 2008 Dear Reader: We are pleased to announce that after five years of hard work and collaborative effort, the Vermilion Cliffs National Monument Resource Management Plan (Approved Plan) is complete. This document represents the first management plan for the Monument and will provide guidance for the management of 279,566 acres of Bureau of Land Management (BLM)-administered lands in northern Arizona. These lands are within the Arizona Strip District in Coconino County, Arizona. The attached Record of Decision (ROD) and Approved Plan have been prepared in accordance with the Federal Land Policy Management Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The ROD/Approved Plan was sent to members of the public who requested a copy and to pertinent local, State, Federal, and Tribal governments. The ROD finalizes the proposed decisions presented in the Arizona Strip Proposed Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) that was released on March 2, 2007 and subject to a 30-day protest period that ended on April 2, 2007. Seven protest letters were received and reviewed by the BLM Assistant Director for Renewable Resources and Planning in Washington, D.C. After careful consideration of all points raised in the protest letters, the Assistant Director concluded that the planning team and responsible decision makers followed all applicable laws, regulations, policies, and pertinent resource considerations in developing the Proposed Plan in the FEIS. -
Records of Wild Sheep Translocations United States and Canada 1922-Present
RECORDS OF WILD SHEEP TRANSLOCATIONS UNITED STATES AND CANADA 1922-PRESENT WILD SHEEP WORKING GROUP June 2015 Photos courtesy of Vic Coggins (ODFW, Retired), Mike Cox (NDOW), Todd Nordeen (NGPC), Earl Nottingham (TPWD), California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and North Dakota Game and Fish Department. Suggested Citation: Wild Sheep Working Group. 2015. Records of Wild Sheep Translocations-United States and Canada, 1922-Present. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, USA. INTRODUCTION Historically, the distribution of wild sheep in North America extended from northern Alaska, Yukon, and Northwest Territories southward through British Columbia and Alberta, Canada to northern Mexico, and from the Pacific coast as far east as western North Dakota, western South Dakota, western Nebraska, and western Texas. Reliable population estimates of wild sheep in North America prior to the 1800s are not available, but numbers in the hundreds of thousands have been reported. Through time, the numbers and distribution of thinhorn sheep (Ovis dalli) are thought to have remained stable. Following settlement of western North America, however, bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) numbers declined rapidly and that species was extirpated from much of its historic range. Translocations have played an integral role in wild sheep restoration and management. Most jurisdictions that manage bighorn sheep view translocations as a technique necessary for restoring those specialized ungulates to historic habitat, establishing new populations within suitable, but unoccupied habitat, and augmenting existing populations. However, translocation is not a widely used practice in thinhorn sheep conservation. Historic records indicate fewer than 10 translocations of thinhorn sheep have occurred in the past, and none have occurred across jurisdictional boundaries (i.e., Alaska, Yukon Territory, Northwest Territories, or British Columbia).