Empidonax Traillii Extimus- Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Empidonax traillii extimus - Southwestern willow flycatcher Source: RegS; SanBIOS; USGS 2003-2015 Surveys; CNDDB; CFWO Survey MU Stream Reach Preserve Land Owner Land Manager Year 1 Tijuana River Tijuana River Valley City of San Diego County of San Diego DPR 2009 Regional Park 1 Tijuana River Tijuana River Valley County of San Diego DPR County of San Diego DPR 2009 2 San Diego River Flood Control Channel City of San Diego City of San Diego Park and 2011 Southern Wildlife Preserve Recreation Department 2 San Diego River San Diego River Ecological California Department of California Department of 2010 Reserve Fish and Wildlife Fish and Wildlife 2 San Diego River SD River Corp SD River Corp 2009 4 Chocolate Creek SDGE Sunrise Powerlink San Diego Gas and Electric San Diego Gas and Electric 2010 4 Second San Diego Mission Trails Regional City of San Diego City of San Diego Park and 2009 Aqueduct Park Recreation Department 4 San Diego River El Capitan Reservoir Open City of San Diego Public City of San Diego Public 2001 6 San Luis Rey River San Luis Rey River Park City of Oceanside City of Oceanside 2015 6 Pilgrim Creek San Luis Rey River Park City of Oceanside City of Oceanside 2014 6 San Luis Rey River City of Oceanside Open City of Oceanside 2007 Space 6 Pilgrim Creek San Luis Rey River Park City of Oceanside City of Oceanside 2007 6 Pilgrim Creek San Luis Rey River Park City of Oceanside City of Oceanside 2006 6 San Luis Rey River San Luis Rey River Park City of Oceanside City of Oceanside 2006 6 San Dieguito River Hodges Reservoir Open City of San Diego Public City of San Diego Public 2003 6 San Dieguito River Hodges Reservoir Open City of San Diego Public City of San Diego Public 2002 Space Utilities Department Utilities Department 7 San Luis Rey River San Luis Rey River Park City of Oceanside City of Oceanside 2015 8 San Luis Rey River Groves Open Space County of San Diego DPR County of San Diego DPR 2015 8 San Luis Rey River San Luis Rey River California Department of California Department of 2015 Ecological Reserve Fish and Wildlife Fish and Wildlife 8 San Luis Rey River San Luis Rey River Park CALTRANS Caltrans 2015 8 San Luis Rey River San Luis Rey River Park City of Oceanside City of Oceanside 2015 8 San Luis Rey River San Luis Rey River Park CALTRANS Caltrans 2013 Empidonax traillii extimus - Southwestern willow flycatcher Survey MU Stream Reach Preserve Land Owner Land Manager Year 8 San Luis Rey River Groves Open Space County of San Diego DPR County of San Diego DPR 2007 8 Santa Margarita River Santa Margarita Ecological San Diego State University 2002 Reserve Foundation 9 San Luis Rey River Cleveland National Forest U.S. Forest Service U.S. Forest Service 2002 10 San Luis Rey River Cleveland National Forest U.S. Forest Service U.S. Forest Service 2015 10 San Luis Rey River Cleveland National Forest U.S. Forest Service U.S. Forest Service 2002 10 Cedar Creek William Heise Regional County of San Diego DPR County of San Diego DPR 2001 Park 11 Wilson Creek Barrett Reservoir Open City of San Diego Public City of San Diego Public 2009 Space Utilities Department Utilities Department 11 Wilson Creek Cleveland National Forest U.S. Forest Service U.S. Forest Service 2009.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Purpose and Need for the Project Chapter 1.0 – Purpose and Need for the Project
CHAPTER 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT CHAPTER 1.0 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT 1.1 INTRODUCTION The General Services Administration (GSA) proposes the reconfiguration and expansion of the existing San Ysidro Land Port of Entry (LPOE). The San Ysidro LPOE is located along Interstate 5 (I-5) at the United States (U.S.)-Mexico border in the San Ysidro community of San Diego, California. The proposed San Ysidro LPOE improvements are herein referred to as the “Project.” The total area of the Project Study Area, which comprises the anticipated maximum extent of disturbance, including improvements, staging areas, and temporary impacts resulting from Project construction, encompasses approximately 50 acres. Figure 1-1 illustrates the regional location of the Project, and Figure 1-2 shows the Project Study Area and the Project vicinity. The Project is included in the San Diego Association of Governments’ (SANDAG) 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP; SANDAG 2007); and the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP; SANDAG 2008), which covers Fiscal Years (FY) 2009 through 2013. 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED 1.2.1 Purpose of the Project The purpose of the Project is to improve operational efficiency, security, and safety for cross-border travelers and federal agencies at the San Ysidro LPOE. Project goals include: Increase vehicle and pedestrian inspection processing capacities at the San Ysidro LPOE; Reduce northbound vehicle and pedestrian queues and wait times to cross the border; Improve the safety of the San Ysidro LPOE for vehicles and pedestrians crossing the border, and for employees at the LPOE; Modernize facilities to accommodate current and future demands and implementation of border security initiatives, such as the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI), the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program (US-VISIT), and the Secure Border Initiative (SBI).
[Show full text]
San Diego River Park Master Plan
San Diego River Park Master Plan City of San Diego, California DRAFT – May 2013 San Diego River Park Master Plan The City of San Diego Adopted by the: Council of the City of San Diego Draft: May 2013 Resolution Number: R- San Diego River Park Master Plan – Draft May 2013 | i San Diego River Park Master Plan Amendments Amendment Date Approved by Resolution Date Adopted by City Resolution Planning Commission Number Council Number San Diego River Park Master Plan Certified by the California Coastal Commission on San Diego River Park Master Plan – Draft May 2013 | ii Mayor Bob Filner City Council Planning Commission District 1, Councilmember Sherri Lightner Eric Naslund, Chairperson District 2, Councilmember Kevin Faulconer Tim Golba, Vice-Chairperson District 3, Council President Todd Gloria Robert Griswold District 4, Councilmember Vacant Stephen Haase District 5, Councilmember Mark Kersey Sue Peerson District 6, Councilmember Lorie Zapf Michael Smiley District 7, Councilmember Scott Sherman District 8, Councilmember David Alvarez District 9, Councilmember Marti Emerald City Attorney Jan Goldsmith San Diego River Park Master Plan – Draft May 2013 | iii Acknowledgements San Diego River Park Foundation Development Services Department and San Diego River Coalition Kelly Broughton, Director Rob Hutsel, Executive Director Nancy Bragado, Principal Planner Michael Beck, Chair of the Board of Directors Robin Shifflet, Park Designer/Project Manager M. Lea Rudee, Ph.D., Vice Chair Jeff Harkness, Park Designer Janie DeCelles, Secretary Myra Herrmann, Senior Planner Charles V. Berwanger, Treasurer Dan Monroe, Senior Planner Jo Ann Anderson Dan Normandin, Senior Planner Sam Duran Brian Schoenfisch, Senior Planner Joan Embery Alan Grant City of San Diego Park and Recreation Board Cary Lowe Wilbur Smith, Chairperson James Peugh Bruce Brown Phil Pryde Rick Bussell James Ryan Amy Denhart Tom Sudberry William Diehl Claudia Dunaway Vickie Granowitz Master Plan Design Consultants Bobby Hughes Civitas, Inc.
[Show full text]
Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report
Climate Understanding & Resilience in the River Valley Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report Prepared by the Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve for the CURRV project’s Stakeholder Working Group Updated April 14, 2014 This project is funded by a grant from the Coastal and Ocean Climate Applications Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office. Also, supported in part by a grant from the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative. 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Resources and Geography ........................................................................................................................... 6 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Topography & Floodplain ....................................................................................................................... 6 Hydrology ..............................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
[Show full text]
H. Fluvial Hydraulics Study
APPENDIX H Fluvial Hydraulics Study OOttaayy RRiivveerr EEssttuuaarryy RReessttoorraattiioonn PPrroojjeecctt ))/89,$/++<'5$8/,&66678'< Prepared for 3RVHLGRQ:DWHU//& Prepared by (YHUHVW,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQVXOWDQWV,QF $SULO (9(5(67 27$<5,9(5(678$5<5(6725$7,21352-(&7 )/89,$/+<'5$8/,&6678'< Prepared For: 3RVHLGRQ:DWHU//& )OHHW6WUHHW6XLWH &DUOVEDG&$ &RQWDFW6WDQ:LOOLDPV Prepared By: (YHUHVW,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQVXOWDQWV,QF :HVW2FHDQ%RXOHYDUG6XLWH /RQJ%HDFK&$ &RQWDFW'DYLG&DQQRQ (YHUHVW3URMHFW1XPEHU3 $SULO Otay River Estuary Restoration Project Fluvial Hydraulics Study Report 7$%/(2)&217(176 ,1752'8&7,21 %DFNJURXQG 3XUSRVH 2EMHFWLYHV (;,67,1*&21',7,216'(6&5,37,21 3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ 2WD\5LYHU 2WD\5LYHU)ORRGSODLQDQG(VWXDU\ 352326('352-(&7'(6&5,37,21 2YHUYLHZ ,QWHUWLGDO$OWHUQDWLYH 6XEWLGDO$OWHUQDWLYH 678'<$3352$&+ 2YHUYLHZ 0RGHO6HWXS 0RGHO%RXQGDU\&RQGLWLRQV )/22',03$&7$1$/<6(6 $SSURDFK )ORRG0RGHOLQJ )ORRG,PSDFWV %LNH3DWK,PSDFWV 6XPPDU\ Everest International Consultants, Inc. i Otay River Estuary Restoration Project Fluvial Hydraulics Study Report (526,21,03$&7$1$/<6,6 $SSURDFK 9HORFLW\5HVXOWV (URVLRQ,PSDFWV 6XPPDU\ )/89,$/6(',0(17$7,21$1$/<6,6 $SSURDFK 6HGLPHQW/RDGLQJIURP2WD\5LYHU:DWHUVKHG 3RWHQWLDO6HGLPHQW'HOLYHU\)URP2WD\5LYHUWR3URSRVHG:HWODQG 3RWHQWLDO6HGLPHQWDWLRQ5DWHDWWKH3URSRVHG:HWODQG ())(&72)6($/(9(/5,6( 2YHUYLHZ )ORRG0RGHOLQJ5HVXOWV &21&/86,216$1'5(&200(1'$7,216 5()(5(1&(6 $33(1',;$ )/89,$/$1$/<6,6$7%$<6,'(3$5.,03(5,$/%($&+$ $33(1',;% (526,213527(&7,21)257+(6287+%$<6+25(%,.(:$<%5,'*(% Everest
[Show full text]
Chapter I – Purpose and Need
1 Environmental Assessment Kitchen Creek Helitanker Base Project To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, the Kitchen Creek Helitanker Base Environmental Assessment has been prepared. This Environmental Assessment tiers to the decision for the 2005 Land and Resource Management Plan for the Cleveland National Forest and complies with the standards and guidelines of that plan. To avoid bulk and duplication these documents are incorporated by reference. These documents, as well as information from the project record are available from the Cleveland National Forest Supervisor’s Office, San Diego, California. This Environmental Assessment is not a decision document. Instead, it presents the evidence and analysis necessary to determine whether the consequences of the Proposed Action are “significant” and therefore whether an Environmental Impact Statement is necessary. The Responsible Official (Donn Christiansen, District Ranger, Descanso Ranger District) will determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement is necessary and whether or not to implement one of the alternatives considered in the Environmental Assessment. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
[Show full text]
Watershed Summaries
Appendix A: Watershed Summaries Preface California’s watersheds supply water for drinking, recreation, industry, and farming and at the same time provide critical habitat for a wide variety of animal species. Conceptually, a watershed is any sloping surface that sheds water, such as a creek, lake, slough or estuary. In southern California, rapid population growth in watersheds has led to increased conflict between human users of natural resources, dramatic loss of native diversity, and a general decline in the health of ecosystems. California ranks second in the country in the number of listed endangered and threatened aquatic species. This Appendix is a “working” database that can be supplemented in the future. It provides a brief overview of information on the major hydrological units of the South Coast, and draws from the following primary sources: • The California Rivers Assessment (CARA) database (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/newcara) provides information on large-scale watershed and river basin statistics; • Information on the creeks and watersheds for the ESU of the endangered southern steelhead trout from the National Marine Fisheries Service (http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/SoCalDistrib.htm); • Watershed Plans from the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that provide summaries of existing hydrological units for each subregion of the south coast (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcbs/index.html); • General information on the ecology of the rivers and watersheds of the south coast described in California’s Rivers and Streams: Working
[Show full text]
San Diego River Park Conceptual Plan San Diego River Park Foundation
SAN DIEGO RIVER PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN SAN DIEGO RIVER PARK FOUNDATION The mission of the San Diego River Park Foundation is to support The Foundation works to support important projects which will and empower community groups working to restore and enhance help to establish a river-long park while restoring and enhancing the San Diego River and to foster stewardship of this important the river, providing greatly needed community facilities and community and regional asset in perpetuity. opportunities to learn about our region’s rich history, encouraging stewardship of the riparian environment, and improving the lives of those that live, work and play in the area. We are dedicated to making this project a truly treasured regional asset that is valued by all members of our community. We welcome and encourage everyone who is interested to join us in this effort. San Diego River Park Conceptual Plan Prepared for San Diego River Park Foundation Sponsored by California Coastal Conservancy Design Team Sarah Easley Leslie Redick Katie Turnbull Wei Zhang Principal Advisors Kyle Brown, Ph.D. Phil Pregill, ASLA Gerald O. Taylor, Jr., ASLA Joan Woodward, ASLA June, 2002 606 Studio Department of Landscape Architecture California State Polytechnic University, Pomona ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Project Team would like to thank the following individuals Canyon Citizens Advisory Committee, San Diego River Park and organizations for their support and significant contributions to - Lakeside Conservancy, San Diego River Park Foundation, this study. Cuyamaca Rancho Foundation, Friends of Dog Beach, Friends of Famosa Slough, Friends of Mission Valley Preserve, Friends We express our appreciation to Rob Hutsel of the San Diego of Adobe Falls, Navajo Community Planners, Tierrasanta River Park Foundation for being our source of everlasting Community Council, Mission Valley Community Council, Ocean inspiration, knowledge and support.
[Show full text]
4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
[Show full text]
4.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources
4.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources 4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES This section evaluates the potential impacts to visual resources and aesthetics associated with implementation of the 2050 RTP/SCS. The information presented was compiled from multiple sources, including information from the San Diego County Draft General Plan and its associated Draft EIR (2010), and the SANDAG 2030 RTP EIR (2007). 4.1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Regional Character The San Diego region is an area of abundant and varied scenic resources. The topography of the region contributes greatly to the overall character and quality of the existing visual setting. In general terms, the region is characterized by four topographical regions: coastal plain, foothills, mountains, and desert. The visual character of each is described briefly below. The coastal plain ranges in elevation from sea level to approximately 600 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) and varies from rolling terraces to steep cliffs along the coastline. The coastal plain provides expansive views in all directions, with the coastline visible from some local roadways. Much of the coastal plain is already developed with varying densities of urban and suburban development. Agricultural uses within the coastal area include row crops, field flowers, and greenhouses. The foothills of the San Diego region range in elevation from 600 to 2,000 feet AMSL and are characterized by rolling to hilly uplands that contain frequent narrow, winding valleys. This area is traversed by several rivers as well as a number of intermittent drainages. The foothills are also developed with various urban and rural land uses. Agriculture consists of citrus and avocado orchards as well as row crops.
[Show full text]
Word News Release Template
Cleveland National Forest Forest Service News Release Media Contact: Nathan Judy 858-674-2984 [email protected] San Diego River Conservancy Awards Wildfire Early Action Plan Funds to the Cleveland National Forest SAN DIEGO, Calif. — July 30, 2021. The San Diego River Conservancy authorized $3 million of Wildfire Early Action Plan grant funding for wildfire, climate, watershed, and forest health projects to the Cleveland National Forest. In April, Governor Gavin Newsom signed California Senate Bill No. 85, amending the 2020-21 Budget Act to provide additional funding for various wildfire and forest resilience activities. The Conservancy was allocated $12 million through the Wildfire Early Action Plan. The Cleveland National Forest proposed a wildfire resilience and forest health project, including fuel reduction activities on 1,485 acres of public land, 26.5 miles of roads, the construction of a helicopter landing zone, and three 10,000-gallon underground water tanks, in the headwaters of the San Diego and Tijuana River watersheds. On July 8, 2021, the San Diego River Conservancy Board approved a resolution authorizing the grant. Cleveland National Forest Supervisor Scott Tangenberg said, “These funds will allow us to increase the pace and scale of our treatments on the land with our State and local partners, which will help increase public safety and set us up for even more success in the future. We will be strengthening fire resiliency by increasing fuel reduction treatments, including forest health improvements, improving the safety of fire access roads, installing a remote water source and helicopter access for firefighting and rescues, providing more public outreach to support and encourage home hardening in the wildland urban interface, and so much more.” The projects, which all have completed National Environmental Policy Act decisions, could begin as soon as Fall 2021.
[Show full text]
PCR Detection of Pathogenic Viruses in Southern California Urban Rivers
Journal of Applied Microbiology 2004, 97, 17–28 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02269.x PCR detection of pathogenic viruses in southern California urban rivers S.C. Jiang and W. Chu Environmental Health, Science and Policy, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA 2003/0220: received 17 March 2003, revised 10 December 2003 and accepted 31 January 2004 ABSTRACT S. C. JI A NG AN D W. CH U. 2004. Aims: To investigate human viral contamination in urban rivers and its impact on coastal waters of southern California, USA. Methods and Results: Three types of human viruses (adeno, entero and hepatitis A) were detected using nested- and RT-PCR from 11 rivers and creeks. Faecal indicator bacteria as well as somatic and F-specific coliphage were also tested. Approximately 50% of the sites were positive for human adenoviruses. However, there was no clear relationship between detection of human viruses and the concentration of indicator bacteria and coliphage. Both faecal indicator bacteria and human viral input at beaches near river mouths were associated with storm events. The first storm of the wet season seemed to have the greatest impact on the quality of coastal water than following storm events. Conclusions: This study provides the first direct evidence that human viruses are prevalent in southern California urban rivers. Urban run-off impacts coastal water quality most significantly during the storm season. Significance and Impact of the Study: To protect human health during water recreational activities, it is necessary to develop effective strategies to manage urban run-off during storm events. Keywords: adenovirus, enterovirus, F-specific coliphage, hepatitis A virus, urban run-off.
[Show full text]