Print Adopted Resolution No. 06-03.Tif
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Subsistence Variability in the Willamette Valley Redacted for Privacy
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Francine M. Havercroft for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology, History and Anthropology presented on June 16, 1986. Title: Subsistence Variability in the Willamette Valley Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: V Richard E. Ross During the summer of 1981, Oregon State University archaeologically tested three prehistoric sites on the William L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge. Among the sites tested were typical Willamette Valley floodplain and adjacent upland sites. Most settlement-subsistence pattern models proposed for the Willamette Valley have been generated with data from the eastern valley floor, western Cascade Range foothills. The work at Wm. L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge provides one of the first opportunities to view similar settings along the western margins of the Willamette Valley. Valley Subsistence Variabilityin the Willamette by Francine M. Havercroft A THESIS submitted to Oregon StateUniversity in partial fulfillmentof the requirementsfor the degree of Master of Arts in InterdisciplinaryStudies Completed June 15, 1986 Commencement June 1987 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology inAT6cg-tof major A Redacted for Privacy Professor of History in charge of co-field Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology in charge of co-field Redacted for Privacy Chairman of department of Anthropology Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented June 16, 1986 Typed by Ellinor Curtis for Francine M. Havercroft ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout this project, several individuals have provided valuable contributions, and I extend a debt of gratitude to all those who have helped. The Oregon State university Archaeology field school, conducted atthe Wm. L. Finley Refuge, wasdirected by Dr. -
Community Profile
Section 2: Community Profile Why Plan for Natural Hazards in Yamhill County? ....................................... 2 History of Natural Hazards in Yamhill County .............................................. 2 Geography and Environment....................................................................... 3 Rivers and Streams ............................................................................... 4 Climate .................................................................................................. 7 Minerals and Soils ................................................................................. 8 Significant Geological Factors ............................................................... 8 Population and Demographics..................................................................... 9 Land and Development ............................................................................. 11 Development Regulations.................................................................... 12 Housing and Community Development ..................................................... 13 Employment and History ........................................................................... 13 Transportation and Commuting ................................................................. 14 Historic and Cultural Resources ................................................................ 15 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure............................................................ 15 Yamhill County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan: Community -
10–7–03 Vol. 68 No. 194 Tuesday Oct. 7, 2003 Pages 57783–58008
10–7–03 Tuesday Vol. 68 No. 194 Oct. 7, 2003 Pages 57783–58008 VerDate jul 14 2003 22:52 Oct 06, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\07OCWS.LOC 07OCWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2003 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing. -
Appendix C.2 Historical, Architectural, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources
Appendix C.2 Historical, Architectural, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources Contents Oregon SHPO Concurrence Letter Archaeological and Historical Resources Technical Memorandum Section 106 Coordination Letters C.2-1 HILLSBORO AIRPORT PARALLEL RUNWAY 12L/30R ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX C.2 Oregon SHPO Concurrence Letter Archaeological and Historical Resources Technical Memorandum Final Hillsboro Airport Parallel Runway Project 12L/30R Archaeological and Historical Resources Technical Memorandum Prepared for Port of Portland June 2009 Prepared by Albert C. Oetting, PhD, RPA, and Tama K. Tochihara, MA Heritage Research Associates, Inc. and Summary Heritage Research Associates, Inc. gathered archaeological and historical background data for the proposed Parallel Runway 12L/30R at Hillsboro Airport (HIO), Hillsboro, Oregon. Systematic surveys of the defined Areas of Potential Effect (APE) were conducted to assess the likely presence of archaeological materials and the presence of potentially significant above-ground historical resources. The Area of Potential Effect (APE) is defined as the area of significant noise impact which is within the 65 DNL contour for the 2015 Proposed Action Alternative because historic buildings could be adversely affected by increases in noise levels. The APE also includes the area of potential ground disturbance which could affect archaeological resources, referred to as the archaeological study area (Exhibit 1). Existing Conditions The APE consists of industrial airport use surrounded by a mix of light residential and agriculture properties. No properties on or potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places are located within the APE. All of the land within the archaeological study area consists of open agricultural fields. Several archaeological investigations have been conducted in the vicinity of HIO, including three previous surveys on airport property. -
Chehalem Creek Watershed Assessment (Pdf)
Chehalem Watershed Assessment The Yamhill Basin Council • (503) 472-6403 Yamhill and Polk Counties, Oregon June, 2001 Funding for the Chehalem Watershed Assessment came from an Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) grant and local matching funds. Watershed Assessment Project Manager Jeffrey Empfield Acknowledgements Many people generously shared their time to answer questions, provide information, and in several cases, prepared text for this assessment. They include the following contributors: Ryan Dalton, Bureau of Land Management Ted Gahr, resident Jacqueline Groth, resident Todd Anderson, Assistant Superintendent, Dundee Public Works Denise Hoffert-Hay, Yamhill Basin Council Alan Lee, Newberg Waste Water Treatment Plant Doug Rasmussen, resident Dean O’Reilly, Yamhill County SWCD Peter Snow, resident fisherman Bobbi Riggers, Oregon Plan Watershed Restoration Inventory Kareen Sturgeon, resident Robin Richard, resident James Stonebridge, resident Rob Tracey, Natural Resources Conservation Service Gary Galovich, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Tom Currans, resident Susan Mundy, Yamhill County Public Works Janet Shearer, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Melissa Leoni, Yamhill Basin Council Don Young, McMinnville Water Reclamation Facility Francis Dummer, resident Luella Ackerson, OSU Yamhill County Extension Office Bill Ferber, Oregon Water Resources Department Sam Sweeney, resident Barb Mingay, Newberg Planning Division Gail Meredith, resident Ron Huber, Yamhill County Parks Gordon Jernstedt, resident June Olson, Confederated -
RECEIVED 0MB No
NPS Form 10-900 RECEIVED 0MB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service JUL 5094 National Register of Historic Places .NTERAGENCY RESOURCES DIVISION Registration Form NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual iJiupuillUS and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Fernsrood Pioneer Cemetery other names/site number 2. Location street & number Everest Road, half mile south of Highway 219 for pub|ica,ion city or town __ Ifewberg vicinity state _____ Oregon code_^_ county code °71 zip code 97132 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this S nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property @ meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Chehalem Heritage Trails Strategic Plan
Chehalem Heritage Trail Strategic Plan April 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: KPFF Consulting Engineers | Jerry M. Palmer | Hanna, McEldowney & Associates | Stephens Planning & Design Chehalem Parks and Recreation District, April 2010 Chehalem Park and Recreation District Board Don Loving, President Mike McBride, Vice President Donna McCain, Secretary Larry Anderson Mike Ragsdale Chehalem Park and Recreation District Staff Don Clements, Superintendent Jim McMaster, Parks Supervisor Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. Team Paul Agrimis, Project Manager Maureen Raad, Senior Landscape Architect Mike Yun, Landscape Architect in Training Ric Stephens, Stephens Planning and Design Jerry M. Palmer, Jerry M. Palmer Consulting Curt Vanderzanden, KPFF Consulting Engineers Nick McMurtrey, KPFF Consulting Engineers Roger Hanna, Hanna McEldowney Associates, Inc. For more information or for copies of this report contract: Jim McMaster 503.209.2222 [email protected] VIGIL-AGRIMIS, Inc. i Chehalem Heritage Trail Strategic Plan ii VIGIL-AGRIMIS, Inc. Chehalem Parks and Recreation District, April 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 Background ................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Strategic Plan Purpose & History ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Strategic Plan Context........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Natural Heritage ................................................................................................................... -