Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program: Seven Case Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program: Seven Case Studies ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INSTITUTE The Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program: Seven Case Studies Environmental Law Institute May 2008 The Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program Seven Case Studies The Environmental Law Institute® May 2008 The Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program i Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Environmental Law Institute, with funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assessment and Watershed Protection Program Grant Cooperative Agreement AW-8324340-1-0. The report was written by Adam P. Schempp and James McElfish, with additional research by Kathryn Mengerink and assistance from Michael Dudkin and Anne Davis. We gratefully acknowledge the information provided by Christine Ruf and U.S. EPA Watershed Branch staff, as well as Jason Baker, Kim Bogenschutz, Susan Braley, Chad Brown, Jeff DeShon, Coby Dolan, Naomi Feger, Dorena Goding, Kathy Hamel, Arthur Johnson, Darryl Joyner, Joe Karkoski, Ken Koch, Richard McVoy, Trinka Mount, Jeff Myers, John Navarro, John Olsen, Steven Sanford, Don Schmitz, Craig J. Wilson, and Chris O. Yoder. U.S. EPA commented on drafts of the report; however, the views expressed in the report are solely those of the Environmental Law Institute, and no Agency endorsement should be inferred. About ELI Publications— ELI publishes Research Reports that present the analysis and conclusions of the policy studies ELI undertakes to improve environmental law and policy. In addition, ELI publishes several journals and reporters—including the Environmental Law Reporter, The Environmental Forum, and the National Wetlands Newsletter—and books, which contribute to educa- tion of the profession and disseminate diverse points of view and opinions to stimulate a robust and creative exchange of ideas. Those publications, which express opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Institute, its Board of Directors, or funding organizations, exemplify ELI’s commitment to dialogue with all sectors. ELI welcomes sugges- tions for article and book topics and encourages the submission of draft manuscripts and book proposals. The Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program: Seven Case Studies Copyright © 2008 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-58576-144-9, ELI Project No. 0511-01. An electronic retrievable copy (PDF file) of this report may be obtained for no cost from the Environmental Law Institute Website www.eli.org; click on “ELI Publications,” then search for this report. [Note: ELI Terms of Use will apply and are available on site.] (Environmental Law Institute®, The Environmental Forum®, and ELR® — The Environmental Law Reporter® are registered trademarks of the Environmental Law Institute.) ii Environmental Law Institute Table of Contents Summary of Findings Introduction . 1 The Invasive Species Problem . 1 Research . 2 Water Quality Standards. 3 Impairment of Water Quality. 5 Listing for Aquatic Invasive Species Impairment. 5 TMDLs Addressing Aquatic Invasive Species Impairment. 8 Other Aquatic Invasive Species Programs. 9 Conclusion. 10 Chart: Clean Water Act Framework. .………12 Appendix: Case Study Reports California. ………15 Florida . ………20 Iowa. ………24 Massachusetts . ………28 New York . ………32 Ohio . ………36 Washington. ………40 The Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program iii Summary of Findings Summary of Findings Introduction has recognized aquatic invasive species as a cause of impairment at some time. Five case study states There is much debate over whether and how to have listed water segments as impaired by invasive address the effects of aquatic invasive species in species on at least one of their periodic 303(d) the Clean Water Act’s Total Maximum Daily Load lists. Presently, two case study states (California 1 (TMDL) program, but regardless of one’s stance and Ohio) list waters as impaired by invasive spe- on that issue, these species have influenced and cies on their respective 303(d) lists, and four continue to affect state assessments of water qual- include such impairments in Category 4c, caused ity and the administration of TMDL programs. Many by a non-pollutant. When waters are placed on a aquatic invasive species degrade water quality by 303(d) list for impairment by a pollutant, states are changing the natural characteristics of the water, required to develop a TMDL. No case study state reducing the abundance and diversity of native has yet submitted a TMDL for invasive species to aquatic life, or impeding human uses of the water. the U.S. EPA for approval. However, four case study The Environmental Law Institute (ELI), with funding states have developed TMDLs for other causes of from and in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental impairment that address invasive species, and two Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), conducted research others have such TMDLs forthcoming. While states on seven states representing a range of geography, with a great number of invasive species tend to number of aquatic invasive species present, water have more comprehensive invasive species manage- quality standards, 303(d) listings for invasive species, ment programs apart from their Clean Water Act and aquatic invasive species management programs. programs, there is no correlation between exis- The states selected for the study were California, tence of invasive species management programs Florida, Iowa, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, and and the state’s approach to invasive species under 2 Washington. ELI examined how the adverse effects the TMDL program. While the TMDL program has of aquatic invasive species have influenced water not yet proven to be an ideal means of addressing quality listings and TMDL development and whether aquatic invasive species, it has proven capable of the TMDL program may affect other invasive species considering this cause of impairment. programs operated by the states. ELI research indicates that the effects of aquatic The Invasive Species Problem invasive species appear in state water quality Advancements in transportation and growth in assessments. These effects may amount to a viola- domestic and international commerce have led to tion of state water quality standards and may lead the introduction of numerous species into new envi- to the identification of waters as impaired under ronments. Some species arrive intentionally as live Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. All seven produce, household plants or pets, or to serve a more case study states have water quality standards that utilitarian function such as preventing bank erosion could be violated by the effects of invasive species, or as a biocontrol for an invasive species. Others and several of these states have found specific des- arrive more covertly, stored in ballast tanks of ves- ignated uses impaired by invasive species in certain sels, on or among commercial goods, or even in the instances. Every case study state except Florida packaging of those goods. Many species are unable to adapt to the conditions of the new environment and do not survive. Fewer still truly thrive. However, a non-native species can cause substantial ecological 1. The term “Total Maximum Daily Load” is defined in the EPA and economic damage where conditions are favorable Clean Water Act regulations as “The sum of the individual [waste- for its proliferation. load allocations] for point sources and [load allocations] for non- point sources and natural background.” 40 C.F.R. § 130.2(i). TMDL Every state in the United States has some species in listing and program regulations are at C.F.R. § 130.7; detailed TMDL program information can be found at http://www.epa.gov/owow/ its waters that are not native to the state. The number tmdl/. of such identified species in any state varies from 2. Detailed reports of ELI’s findings for each of the case study approximately 25 in Alaska to over 450 in California, states are attached as an appendix to this document. The Role of Aquatic Invasive Species in State Listing of Impaired Waters and the TMDL Program 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS with a median number of non-native aquatic species Wyoming,10 can increase nutrient loading, affect the at roughly 90.3 Some non-native species have had such integrity of aquatic communities, inhibit recreational significant effects on their new surroundings that uses, and degrade visual aesthetics.11 Zebra mussels, they have caused harm to the environment, economy, present in nearly half of the states,12 have been found or human health. These species often are referred to to cause low dissolved oxygen in rivers during sum- as “invasive species.”4 They adapt well to their new mer months on account of their respiratory activity, environment, spreading unchecked due to a lack of the decomposition of their waste products, and the natural predators or other environmental controls. decay of dead mussels.13 Additionally, the phosphate They often cause biological and economic harm by and ammonia that zebra mussels excrete increases out-competing native species, shifting the balance in the levels of both of these compounds in the water.14 the local ecology, and interfering with human use of In Saginaw Bay and Lake Erie, zebra and quagga water resources. Zebra mussels alone have cost the mussels even have been shown to promote and main- Great Lakes region approximately $3 billion over the tain blooms of potentially toxic blue-green algae, last 10 years just to mitigate the damage that they Microcystis, by consuming competing algal strains, have caused by clogging water intake pipes, fouling spitting the Microcystis back into the water, and beaches, sinking navigation buoys, and creating simi- fertilizing the Microcystis with phosphate and ammo- lar nuisances.5 nia.15 Since many aquatic invasive species have no natural predators and easily move or are inadvertently Invasive species can have direct and substantial transported between bodies of water, these water effects on water quality.
Recommended publications
  • Friends of the Blue Hills |
    Discover the Blue Hills Blue Hills Reservation Guide and Maps Friends of the Blue Hills PO Box 416 Milton, MA 02186 [email protected] Original edition produced by David Hodgdon and Thomas Palmer www.FriendsoftheBlueHills.org Friends of the Blue Hills 1 www.FriendsoftheBlueHills.org Introduction Whether you are a frequent sojourner in the Blue Hills, or a new glimpse of the unusual mating dance of the American woodcock. visitor, there is always something new to be explored in this inspiring You can spend your summers swimming at Houghton’s Pond, a landscape. Among the 7,000 plus acres there are opportunities to hike, kettle pond formation, gift of the glacial age, or pack your rod for some bike, ski, swim, climb and contemplate the simple beauty of nature. One fishing at Ponkapoag Pond. In the warmer months, try launching your can take a serpentine drive through the reservation, stopping to admire canoe on the Neponset River at Fowl Meadow. When the precipitation views along the way, or accept the challenge of hiking the Skyline Trail turns to snow, revisit Fowl Meadow for flat, easy cross-country skiing from beginning to end. or, alternatively, speed down the slopes at the Blue Hill Ski Area. For adventurous souls, there’s the challenge of biking Great Blue Hill or rock climbing on the vertical walls at Quincy Quarries in the northernmost part of the park. Those seeking a workout can hike the Skyline Trail from Quincy to Canton, a hike offering much elevation change and wonderful views. Even if you don’t consider yourself a serious hiker, you’ll still find easy rambles on trails that take you around Houghton’s Pond.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load
    DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission April 2007 DRAFT Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi
    [Show full text]
  • Wenham Great Pond
    Wenham Great Pond BY JOHJV C. PHILLIPS SALEM PEABODY MUSEUM Copyright, 1938, by The Peabody Museum, Salem, Massachusetts Printed by The Southworth-A nthoensen Press, Portland, Maine \VEN HAM GREAT POND MosT of the source material for this book was collected for me by Mr.Arthur C. Pickering of Salem in 1913. He had access to the town records of Wenham and Beverly, the libraries of Boston, Salem and Beverly, the files of the Salem Register, Water Board Records) the Registry of Deeds in Salem) etc.) etc. He talked with various of the older men of that time) Mr. John Robinson of Salem, Mr. Robert S. Rantoul (author of the paper on Wenham Lake from which I quote largely), Alonzo Galloupe of Beverly) Mr. William Porter) then town clerk of Wenham) Mr. George E. Woodbury of the Beverly Historical Society) and others. For a good many years these notes of Mr. Pickering's lay around my desk) but in 1933 they were used to prepare an article on Wen­ ham Lake) partly historical) partly dealing with the water short­ age) which appeared in the Salem Evening News in March and April of that year. Ahead of us lies 1943, when Wenham will celebrate her three hundredth anniversary, and it seems possible that a collection of notes such as these) dealing with one of our best known "Great Ponds)" might be acceptable )for the lives of the earlier people must always have centered around this beautiful lake. I was greatly disappointed, at the time we were looking up the history of the lake) to find so few references to it, almost nothing of Indian l()re, of the fisheries and wild lift, or the earliest settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Thematic Mapper Imagery to Assess Water Quality, Trophic State, and Macrophyte Distributions in Massachusetts Lakes
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Use of Thematic Mapper Imagery to Assess Water Quality, Trophic State, and Macrophyte Distributions in Massachusetts Lakes By MARCUS C. WALDRON, PETER A. STEEVES, and JOHN T. FINN (Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst) Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4016 Prepared in cooperation with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Northborough, Massachusetts 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of trade or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts-Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 10 Bearfoot Road Denver, CO 80225-0286 Northborough, MA 01532 or visit our web site at http://ma.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Methods......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MDPH Beaches Annual Report 2008
    Marine and Freshwater Beach Testing in Massachusetts Annual Report: 2008 Season Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health Environmental Toxicology Program http://www.mass.gov/dph/topics/beaches.htm July 2009 PART ONE: THE MDPH/BEH BEACHES PROJECT 3 I. Overview ......................................................................................................5 II. Background ..................................................................................................6 A. Beach Water Quality & Health: the need for testing......................................................... 6 B. Establishment of the MDPH/BEHP Beaches Project ....................................................... 6 III. Beach Water Quality Monitoring...................................................................8 A. Sample collection..............................................................................................................8 B. Sample analysis................................................................................................................9 1. The MDPH contract laboratory program ...................................................................... 9 2. The use of indicators .................................................................................................... 9 3. Enterococci................................................................................................................... 10 4. E. coli...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts' Waters
    Photo: Supe87, Under license from Shutterstock.com from Supe87, Under license Photo: ToXIC WATERWAYS Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts’ Waters Lauren Randall Environment Massachusetts Research & Policy Center December 2011 Executive Summary Coal-fired power plants are the single larg- Human Services advises that all chil- est source of mercury pollution in the Unit- dren under twelve, pregnant women, ed States. Emissions from these plants even- women who may become pregnant, tually make their way into Massachusetts’ and nursing mothers not consume any waterways, contaminating fish and wildlife. fish from Massachusetts’ waterways. Many of Massachusetts’ waterways are un- der advisory because of mercury contami- Mercury pollution threatens public nation. Eating contaminated fish is the main health source of human exposure to mercury. • Eating contaminated fish is the main Mercury pollution poses enormous public source of human exposure to mercury. health threats. Mercury exposure during • Mercury is a potent neurotoxicant. In critical periods of brain development can the first two years of a child’s life, mer- contribute to irreversible deficits in verbal cury exposure can lead to irreversible skills, damage to attention and motor con- deficits in attention and motor control, trol, and reduced IQ. damage to verbal skills, and reduced IQ. • While adults are at lower risk of neu- In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection rological impairment than children, Agency (EPA) developed and proposed the evidence shows that a low-level dose first national standards limiting mercury and of mercury from fish consumption in other toxic air pollution from existing coal- adults can lead to defects similar to and oil-fired power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Pond and Lake GEIR Appendices
    APPENDIX I WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS AND FUNDING SOURCES NOTE TO READER: Because of ongoing changes in programs and funding sources, the information in this Appendix has been omitted. The most up-to-date information on funding sources can be found at the web site of the Massachusetts Nonpoint Source Management Plan: http://www.state.ma.us/dep/brp/wm/nonpoint.htm and by contacting other agencies and entities or consulting their web sites. Appendix II 2 APPENDIX II TABLE OF CONTENTS LOCAL PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: II.1 SSC- STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE and TITLE 5 (BOH) II.2 Zoning-ZONING REGULATIONS (ZC) II.3 WPA-WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT (ConComm) II.4 RPA-RIVERS PROTECTION ACT (ConComm) STATE PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: DEM II.5 ACEC AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (DEM) II.6 ODS-OFFICE OF DAM SAFETY (DEM) DEP II.7 DRINKING WATER PROTECTION (DEP) II.8 GWDP-GROUND WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT (DEP) II.9 SECP-SEWER EXTENSION OR CONNECTION PERMIT (DEP) II.10 WMA-WATER MANAGEMENT ACT (DEP) II.11 NPDES -NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT (DEP) II.12 SWP-SOLID WASTE PERMIT (DSW) II.13 ORW- OUTSTANDING RESOURCES WATERS (DWM) II.14 LAC-LICENSE TO APPLY CHEMICALS (DWM) II.15 WPP-WETLAND PROTECTION PROGRAM (DWW) II.16 WRP-WETLAND RESTRICTION PROGRAM (DWW) II.17 C.91-WATERWAYS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 91 (DWW) II.18 401- 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION (DWW) DFA II.19 PESTICIDE BUREAU LICENSE (DFA) DFW II.20 DFW-DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE (DFW) II.21 NHESP NATURAL HERITAGE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (DFW) EOEA II.22 CZM-MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (EOEA) II.23 MEPA -MASSACHUSETTS ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (EOEA) MDC II.24 MDC-METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION (MDC) MHC II.25 MHC-MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (MHC) FEDERAL PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: II.26 NPDES - NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION PERMIT , U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance Project Plan (Qapp)
    DRAFT Quality Assurance Project Plan FOR WARNER’S POND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN CONCORD, MASSACHUSETTS PREPARED FOR Town of Concord Division of Natural Resources 141 Keyes Road Concord, Massachusetts 01742 PREPARED BY ESS Group, Inc. 888 Worcester Street, Suite 240 Wellesley, Massachusetts 02482 Project No. C574-000 February 11, 2011 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) For the Warner’s Pond Watershed Management Plan February 11, 2011 PROJECT MANAGER Carl Nielsen DATE ESS Group, Inc. 401 Wampanoag Trail, Suite 400 East Providence, Rhode Island 02915 Phone: (401) 330-1224 Fax: (401) 434-8158 PROJECT SUPERVISOR Delia Kaye DATE Natural Resources Director Concord Division of Natural Resources 141 Keyes Road Concord, Massachusetts 01742 Phone: (978) 318-3285 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE OFFICER Carl Nielsen DATE ESS Group, Inc. 401 Wampanoag Trail, Suite 400 East Providence, Rhode Island 02915 Phone: (401) 330-1224 Fax: (401) 434-8158 MassDEP REVIEWER Arthur Johnson DATE MassDEP, Central Regional Office 627 Main St., 2nd Floor Worcester, Massachusetts 01608 Phone: (508) 767-2873 ESS Group, Inc. © 2011 – This document or any part may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording without the express written consent of ESS Group, Inc. All rights reserved. U.S. EPA QA Officer Steve DiMattei DATE U.S. Environmental Protection Agency QA Chemist, USEPA, 11 Technology Drive North Chelmsford, MA 01863 Phone: (617) 918-8369 Copyright © ESS Group, Inc., 2011 j:\c574-000 town of concord warners pond\reports-submittals\qapp\draft warners pond qapp 021111.doc DISTRIBUTION LIST Delia Kaye Natural Resources Director Concord Division of Natural Resources 141 Keyes Road Concord, Massachusetts 01742 Arthur Johnson MassDEP, Central Regional Office 627 Main St., 2nd Floor Worcester, Massachusetts 01608 Steve DiMattei U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Canton, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
    LowderLowder BrookBrook MA73053_2008 Boston MA73-29_2008 PinePine TreeTree BrookBrook Sprague Pond (3) Pine Tree Brook (5) (TMDL) BalsterBalster BrookBrook Dedham 95 Milton Quincy BeechBeech RunRun 28 Westwood NeponsetNeponset RiverRiver Houghtons Pond MA74015_2008 Lake Hoosicwhisick Pond (3) Blue Hill River 93 MA73-24_2008 Purgatory Brook (4a) (TMDL) MA73-25_2008 Ponkapoag Pecunit Brook (2) Pond MA73-24_2008 Purgatory Brook (4a) (TMDL) MA73-27_2008 Ponkapog Brook (4a) (TMDL) Ponkapoag Brook Randolph Pecunit Brook Ponkapoag Brook MA73043_2008 Norwood Ponkapoag Pond (4c) 138 MA73-22_2008 95 Pequid Brook (5) (TMDL) 24 Canton MA73-02_2008 Neponset River (5) (TMDL) Pequit Brook MA73-02_2008 Neponset River (5) (TMDL) MA73-01_2008 Neponset River (5) (TMDL) MA73-01_2008 Neponset River (5) (TMDL) MA73-05_2008 M A 73 -17_ 2008 Neponset River East Branch (5) (TMDL) Trap hole B roo k (4 a) (T M DL ) Reservoir PequidPequid Brook Brook Pond MA73048_2008 MA73-05_2008 East Branch (5) (TMDL) MA73-05_2008 East Branch (5) (TMDL) Reservoir Pond (4c) York Brook MA73022_2008 Lake MA73020_2008 Glen Echo Pond (3) Forge Pond (5) Glen MA73-20_2008 MA73-20_2008 Beaver Meadow Brook (5) (TMDL) Echo Forge Pond Beaver Meadow Brook (5) (TMDL) Pond Bolivar Redwing Brook Pond MA73-21_2008 MA73005_2008 Stoughton Massapoag Brook (5) Bolivar Pond (5) Sharon Steep Hill Brook Notes: 139 1) Adapted from Final Massachusetts Year 2008 Integrated List of Waters; Massapoag Brook available at http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/08list2.pdf MA73-19_2008 2) Waterbodies shown
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Effects of Winter Drawdowns on the Ecological Character of Littoral Zones in Massachusetts Lakes
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses March 2020 INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES Jason R. Carmignani University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Carmignani, Jason R., "INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 1816. https://doi.org/10.7275/j5k1-fz29 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1816 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2020 Organismic and Evolutionary Biology © Copyright by Jason R. Carmignani 2020 All Rights Reserved INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Approved as to style and content by: ___________________________________ Allison H. Roy, Chair ___________________________________ Andy J. Danylchuk, Member ___________________________________ Cristina Cox Fernandes, Member ___________________________________ Peter D. Hazelton, Member ___________________________________ Jason T. Stolarksi, Member ___________________________________ Paige S.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Hills Reservation Trail
    F . Glenwood Ave. Bates u St r er ALTERNATE Ave. P n v y To Willard a a i a Mullin r c R BOSTON ROUTE TO k e w Mattapan Governor Stoughton Lane Grove St. O’ConnellAvenue w St. B h MILTON HOSPITAL Fore Ave. Willard St. a DCR STONY BROOK g Station To st r i y o Parkway A @ Copeland St. Blue Hills Hills Blue o RESERVATION H (see bus Ashmont v e k Faraday St. nu n schedule) TO HOSPITAL Station e Milton StreetM a Copeland o DCR MOTHER BROOK BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MILTON St. th m Washington St. t Brook e DEDHAM BOSTON RESERVATION u rou REEDSDALE ROAD r r T QUINCY B T rook Neponset Valley Parkway DCR MARTINI SHELL QUARRIES DCR COLELLA ULIN H Wren TerraceHISTORIC SITE Harland Street i MILTON PARK & MOYNIHAN g PLAYGROUND RINK h Avenue RECREATION AREA l QUINCY a Furnace n Randolph Brook Rotary Park Street d EXIT Ave. BOSTON Wakeeld DouglasSt. S Truman Hwy. tr Brush Hill Road ee Hyde Park Avenue t M y @ Wakeeld Ave. Q a Randolph Ave. u a Larry Pl. B w Canton Avenue Ricciuti Drive l ar d n Blue Hill Avenue @ Highland St. r e i e y e e v s n a e e r r S To Quincy QUINCY F l t w G oo y . k P t Bunker Hill r Center Salem St. S a i t r . n P Station e e Lane v k i o West Milton R Unquity Road P o Truman Parkway r Milton T Fu a t MILTON S rn th B Street Street e r a a ce Hyde Park Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Water-Quality Network for Massachusetts
    Statewide Water-Quality Network for Massachusetts By Leslie A. DeSimone, Peter A. Steeves, and Marc J. Zimmerman Abstract Monitoring programs for the development of Total Maximum Daily Loads for specific water bodies, A water-quality monitoring program is which would constitute another tier of the net- proposed that would provide data to meet multiple work, are being developed separately and are not information needs of Massachusetts agencies and described in this report. The basin-based assess- other users concerned with the condition of the ment of existing conditions is designed to provide State’s water resources. The program was information on the status of surface waters with designed by the U.S. Geological Survey and the respect to State water-quality standards and Massachusetts Department of Environmental designated uses in accordance with the reporting Protection, Division of Watershed Management, requirements [Section 305(b)] of the Clean Water with input from many organizations involved in Act (CWA). Geographic Information System water-quality monitoring in the State, and focuses (GIS)-based procedures were developed to inven- on inland surface waters (streams and lakes). The tory streams and lakes in a basin for these pur- proposed monitoring program consists of several poses. Several monitoring approaches for this tier components, or tiers, which are defined in terms and their associated resource requirements were of specific monitoring objectives, and is intended investigated. Analysis of the Neponset Basin for to complement
    [Show full text]