Litigationstages and for Crucial Aspects of Doing Business

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Litigationstages and for Crucial Aspects of Doing Business GLOBAL PRACTICE GUIDE CYPRUS Defi niti ve global law guides off ering comparati ve analysis from top ranked lawyers LAW AND PRACTICE: p.2 Contributed by Dr. K. Chrysostomides & Co LLC Th e ‘Law & Practice’ sections provide easily accessible information on navigating the legal system when conducting business in the jurisdic- tion. Leading lawyers explain local law and practice at key transactional Litigationstages and for crucial aspects of doing business. Cyprus Dr. K. Chrysostomides & Co LLC chambers.com CYPRUS LAW AND PRACTICE Law and Practice Contributed by Dr. K. Chrysostomides & Co LLC Contents 1. General p.4 5.4 Alternatives to Discovery Mechanisms p.11 1.1 General Characteristics of Legal System p.4 5.5 Legal Privilege p.11 1.2 Structure of Country’s Court System p.4 5.6 Rules Disallowing Disclosure of a Document p.12 1.3 Court Filings and Proceedings p.5 6. Injunctive Relief p.12 1.4 Legal Representation in Court p.5 6.1 Circumstances of Injunctive Relief p.12 2. Litigation Funding p.5 6.2 Arrangements for Obtaining Urgent 2.1 Third-party Litigation Funding p.5 Injunctive Relief p.13 2.2 Third-party Funding of Lawsuits p.5 6.3 Availability of Injunctive Relief on an Ex 2.3 Third-party Funding for Plaintiffs and Parte Basis p.13 Defendants p.5 6.4 Applicant’s Liability for Damages p.13 2.4 Minimum and Maximum Amounts of Third- 6.5 Respondent’s Worldwide Assets and party Funding p.5 Injunctive Relief p.13 2.5 Third-party Funding of Costs p.5 6.6 Third Parties and Injunctive Relief p.13 2.6 Contingency Fees p.5 6.7 Consequences of a Respondent’s Non- 2.7 Time Limit for Obtaining Third-party Funding p.5 compliance p.14 3. Initiating a Lawsuit p.5 7. Trials and Hearings p.14 3.1 Rules on Pre-action Conduct p.5 7.1 Trial Proceedings p.14 3.2 Statutes of Limitations p.6 7.2 Case Management Hearings p.14 3.3 Jurisdictional Requirements for a Defendant p.7 7.3 Jury Trials in Civil Cases p.14 3.4 Initial Complaint p.7 7.4 Rules That Govern Admission of Evidence p.14 3.5 Rules of Service p.8 7.5 Expert Testimony p.14 3.6 Failure to Respond to a Lawsuit p.8 7.6 Extent to Which Hearings are Open to the Public p.15 3.7 Representative or Collective Actions p.9 7.7 Level of Intervention by a Judge p.15 3.8 Requirement for a Costs Estimate p.9 7.8 General Timeframes for Proceedings p.15 4. Pre-trial Proceedings p.9 8. Settlement p.15 4.1 Interim Applications/Motions p.9 8.1 Court Approval p.15 4.2 Early Judgment Applications p.10 8.2 Settlement of Lawsuits and Confidentiality p.15 4.3 Dispositive Motions p.10 8.3 Enforcement of Settlement Agreements p.15 4.4 Requirements for Interested Parties to Join a Lawsuit p.10 8.4 Setting Aside Settlement Agreements p.15 4.5 Applications for Security for Defendant’s Costs p.10 9. Damages and Judgment p.16 4.6 Costs of Interim Applications/Motions p.11 9.1 Awards Available to a Successful Litigant p.16 4.7 Application/Motion Timeframe p.11 9.2 Rules Regarding Damages p.16 5. Discovery p.11 9.3 Pre- and Post-judgment Interest p.16 5.1 Discovery and Civil Cases p.11 9.4 Enforcement Mechanisms for a Domestic Judgment p.16 5.2 Discovery and Third Parties p.11 9.5 Enforcement of a Judgment From a Foreign 5.3 Discovery in this Jurisdiction p.11 Country p.16 2 LAW AND PRACTICE CYPRUS 10. Appeal p.17 10.1 Levels of Appeal or Review Available to a Litigant Party p.17 10.2 Rules Concerning Appeals of Judgments p.17 10.3 Procedure for Taking an Appeal p.17 10.4 Issues Considered by the Appeal Court at an Appeal p.18 10.5 Court-imposed Conditions on Granting an Appeal p.18 10.6 Powers of the Appellate Court After an Appeal Hearing p.18 11. Costs p.18 11.1 Responsibility for Paying the Costs of Litigation p.18 11.2 Factors Considered When Awarding Costs p.18 11.3 Interest Awarded on Costs p.18 12. Alternative Dispute Resolution p.18 12.1 Views on ADR in this Jurisdiction p.18 12.2 ADR Within the Legal System p.19 12.3 ADR Institutions p.19 13. Arbitration p.19 13.1 Laws Regarding the Conduct of Arbitrations p.19 13.2 Subject Matter not Referred to Arbitration p.19 13.3 Circumstances to Challenge an Arbitral Award p.20 13.4 Procedure for Enforcing Domestic and Foreign Arbitration p.20 3 CYPRUS LAW AND PRACTICE Dr. K. Chrysostomides & Co LLC has 19 lawyers in its Dis- alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as arbi- pute Resolution team, with significant experience in a wide tration and mediation. The team works very closely with range of commercial litigation matters, focusing on both the firm’s other practice areas, such as corporate, tax and international and domestic corporate disputes, fraud and finance, antitrust, administrative and criminal law, and with conspiracy claims, the enforcement of foreign judgments/ the IP department, to perform risk assessments to help re- arbitration award applications, and winding-up applica- duce overall litigation exposure for clients. Lawyers have tions, among other matters. The lawyers seek to identify extensive experience before the Cyprus courts and various and implement the most appropriate solutions for clients, international arbitration courts and tribunals. through either pursuing or defending litigation or other Authors Victoria-Zoi Papagiannis is a partner in Yiannis Karamanolis is a partner in the the Dispute Resolution department and Dispute Resolution team and has has considerable experience in significant experience in a wide range of commercial and corporate litigation and contentious matters, focusing on arbitration, primarily with a multi- international commercial litigation and jurisdictional aspect, in cases involving corporate disputes, winding-up complex shareholders’ disputes, derivative claims, fraud, applications, breach of contract, product liability, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duties and competition law, intellectual property and employment law negligence, as well as the issuance of interim relief, claims. He also represents clients in multi-jurisdictional primarily freezing, disclosure and search interim orders, in cases that require the issuance of interim freezing and aid of court or arbitral proceedings. She also regularly disclosure injunctions. in management and corporate advises on issues pertaining to the recognition and control disputes, derivative shareholders’ claims, breach of enforcement of foreign court judgments and arbitral fiduciary duties claims, unlawful termination of awards, on cases relating to professional and product distribution franchise and licensing agreements and liability (especially medical negligence and faulty medical complex banking litigation cases involving legal entities equipment), as well as on European Union law matters. under liquidation or administration. In addition to representing clients in court at all levels, he also advises clients on commercial agreements and strategies to reduce their potential exposure to litigation. 1. General The main specialised courts are as follows: 1.1 General Characteristics of Legal System • the Assizes Court tries criminal offences, which are punish- The Cypriot legal system is considered a mixed legal sys- able with more than five years’ imprisonment; tem. Private law is based on common law, and public law • the Industrial Disputes Tribunal has the exclusive jurisdic- derives from the civil law tradition. Procedural law is based tion to determine any dispute arising from the employ- on common law. ment relationship between employers and employees and its termination; The legal process in both civil and criminal matters is adver- • the Family Courts have jurisdiction in all family disputes; sarial and is conducted with both written submissions and • the Rent Control Courts deal with the recovery of posses- oral arguments. sion of any controlled properties and the determination of a fair rent for said properties; 1.2 Structure of Country’s Court System • the Military Court has jurisdiction to try offences commit- The court structure has two tiers, comprising the District ted by military personnel; and and Specialised courts (first tier) and the Supreme Court • the newly established Administrative Court has the exclu- (second tier). sive jurisdiction to hear recourses filed against a decision, act or omission of any person, authority or organ exercising The District Courts have jurisdiction to hear and try civil executive or administrative authority, which is contrary to actions and criminal proceedings at first instance, as well as the Constitution or any law, or has been issued in excess or any other actions that do not fall within the jurisdiction of abuse of powers vested in such authority, organ or person. the specialised courts. 4 LAW AND PRACTICE CYPRUS The Supreme Court acts as an Admiralty Court and as the only his own costs but also the costs of his victorious op- final appellate court, and has jurisdiction to hear and deter- ponent. mine all appeals from the first-tier courts. Third-party funding is not prohibited, but is rarely used. 1.3 Court Filings and Proceedings The general rule is that Court proceedings are conducted in Pursuant to the provision of the Legal Aid Law public, but courts can order that hearings must take place (L.165(I)/2002), as amended, legal aid may be provided by in private in certain circumstances. The courts can also an- the Republic when individuals cannot bear the costs of the onymise parties and witnesses to the litigation, and impose legal proceedings without affecting their personal and fam- reporting restrictions where doing so is necessary to protect ily basic needs and obligations.
Recommended publications
  • Amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
    April 27, 2020 Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Madam Speaker: I have the honor to submit to the Congress an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that has been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to Section 2072 of Title 28, United States Code. Accompanying the amended rule are the following materials that were submitted to the Court for its consideration pursuant to Section 331 of Title 28, United States Code: a transmittal letter to the Court dated October 23, 2019; a redline version of the rule with committee note; an excerpt from the September 2019 report of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to the Judicial Conference of the United States; and an excerpt from the June 2019 report of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules. Sincerely, /s/ John G. Roberts, Jr. April 27, 2020 Honorable Michael R. Pence President, United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. President: I have the honor to submit to the Congress an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that has been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to Section 2072 of Title 28, United States Code. Accompanying the amended rule are the following materials that were submitted to the Court for its consideration pursuant to Section 331 of Title 28, United States Code: a transmittal letter to the Court dated October 23, 2019; a redline version of the rule with committee note; an excerpt from the September 2019 report of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to the Judicial Conference of the United States; and an excerpt from the June 2019 report of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Tol, Xeer, and Somalinimo: Recognizing Somali And
    Tol , Xeer , and Somalinimo : Recognizing Somali and Mushunguli Refugees as Agents in the Integration Process A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Vinodh Kutty IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY David M. Lipset July 2010 © Vinodh Kutty 2010 Acknowledgements A doctoral dissertation is never completed without the help of many individuals. And to all of them, I owe a deep debt of gratitude. Funding for this project was provided by two block grants from the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota and by two Children and Families Fellowship grants from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. These grants allowed me to travel to the United Kingdom and Kenya to conduct research and observe the trajectory of the refugee resettlement process from refugee camp to processing for immigration and then to resettlement to host country. The members of my dissertation committee, David Lipset, my advisor, Timothy Dunnigan, Frank Miller, and Bruce Downing all provided invaluable support and assistance. Indeed, I sometimes felt that my advisor, David Lipset, would not have been able to write this dissertation without my assistance! Timothy Dunnigan challenged me to honor the Somali community I worked with and for that I am grateful because that made the dissertation so much better. Frank Miller asked very thoughtful questions and always encouraged me and Bruce Downing provided me with detailed feedback to ensure that my writing was clear, succinct and organized. I also have others to thank. To my colleagues at the Office of Multicultural Services at Hennepin County, I want to say “Thank You Very Much!” They all provided me with the inspiration to look at the refugee resettlement process more critically and dared me to suggest ways to improve it.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence in Civil Law – Germany
    © Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retriveal system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Title: Evidence in Civil Law – Germany Authors: Christian Wolf, Nicola Zeibig First published 2015 by Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor Grajska ulica 7, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia www.lex-localis.pres, [email protected] Book Series: Law & Society Series Editor: Tomaž Keresteš CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 347(430)(0.034.2) WOLF, Christian, 1958- Evidence in civil law - Germany [Elektronski vir] / Christian Wolf, Nicola Zeibig. - El. knjiga. - Maribor : Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement, 2015. - (Lex localis) (Book series Law & society) Način dostopa (URL): http://books.lex-localis.press/evidenceincivillaw/germany ISBN 978-961-6842-49-5 (epub) 1. Zeibig, Nicola 281112576 Price: free copy Evidence in Civil Law – Germany Christian Wolf Nicola Zeibig Evidence in Civil Law – Germany 1 CHRISTIAN WOLF & NICOLA ZEIBIG ABSTRACT The fundamental principles in civil procedure do not only serve as guiding principles for civil procedure in general, but are especially relevant in the taking of evidence process. The German Code of Civil Procedure lays down various rules in its part on the taking of evidence, which aim to specify the scope of the fundamental procedural principles as well as their limitations. This reports purposes to depict the taking of evidence process under German law by illustrating its interaction with said principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcement of Copyright in Australia And, in Particular, On
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia &UDFNLQJGRZQRQFRS\FDWV HQIRUFHPHQWRIFRS\ULJKWLQ$XVWUDOLD House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs November 2000 © Commonwealth of Australia 2000 ISBN 0 642 36634 9 &RQWHQWV Foreword...............................................................................................................................................vi Membership of the Committee............................................................................................................ viii Terms of reference ................................................................................................................................x List of abbreviations............................................................................................................................ xiii List of recommendations......................................................................................................................xv 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................1 Referral of inquiry....................................................................................................................... 1 Background to the inquiry......................................................................................................... 2 The inquiry process ................................................................................................................... 3 The report...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Genius of Roman Law from a Law and Economics Perspective
    THE GENIUS OF ROMAN LAW FROM A LAW AND ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE By Juan Javier del Granado 1. What makes Roman law so admirable? 2. Asymmetric information and numerus clausus in Roman private law 2.1 Roman law of property 2.1.1 Clearly defined private domains 2.1.2 Private management of resources 2.2 Roman law of obligations 2.2.1 Private choices to co-operate 2.2.2 Private choices to co-operate without stipulating all eventualities 2.2.3 Private co-operation within extra-contractual relationships 2.2.4 Private co-operation between strangers 2.3 Roman law of commerce and finance 3. Private self-help in Roman law procedure 4. Roman legal scholarship in the restatement of civil law along the lines of law and economics 1. What makes Roman law so admirable? Law and economics aids us in understanding why Roman law is still worthy of admiration and emulation, what constitutes the “genius” of Roman law. For purposes of this paper, “Roman law” means the legal system of the Roman classical period, from about 300 B.C. to about 300 A.D. I will not attempt the tiresome job of being or trying to be a legal historian in this paper. In the manner of German pandect science, let us stipulate that I may arbitrarily choose certain parts of Roman law as being especially noteworthy to the design of an ideal private law system. This paper discusses legal scholarship from the ius commune. It will also discuss a few Greek philosophical ideas which I believe are important in the Roman legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • 104 (I) / 2003 the Marriage Law Arrangement of Sections
    Translation: Union of Cyprus Municipalities Official Gazette Annex I (I) No. 3742, 25.7.2003 Law: 104 (I) / 2003 THE MARRIAGE LAW ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Sections PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short Title 2. Interpretation PART II MARRIAGE 3. Contract of marriage PART III NOTICE OF INTENDED MARRIAGE 4. Notice of intended marriage 5. Filing of Notice 6. Issue of certificates of notice 7. Marriage to be celebrated at earlier date 8. Declaration of parties that there is no impediment PART IV MARRIAGE CEREMONY 9. Marriage Ceremony 10. Refusal to celebrate a marriage 11. Selection of place 12. Marriage certificate PART V CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE CELEBRATION OF MARRIAGE-FAULTY MARRIAGES 13. Categories of faulty marriages 14. Voidable marriages 15. Age for marriage 16. Lifting of voidability 17. Void marriages 18. Dissolution or annulment of previous marriage 19. Nonexistent marriages Translation: Union of Cyprus Municipalities PART VI VOID MARRIAGES 20. Application of this Part 21. Action for annulment 22. Right to file action 23. Lifting of annulment 24. Result of annulment 25. Status of children from annulled marriage 26. Marriage of convenience 27. Grounds for divorce Translation: Union of Cyprus Municipalities Law:104(I)/2003 The Marriage Law of 2003 is issued by publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Cyprus under Section 52 of the Constitution ______ Number 104(I) of 2003 THE MARRIAGE LAW The House of Representatives decides as follows: PART I – PRELIMINARY This Law may be cited as the Marriage Law of 2003 Short Title 1. In this Law unless the context otherwise requires – Interpretation 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Statutes Title 12. Civil Procedure
    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 12. CIVIL PROCEDURE §12-1. Title of chapter...........................................................................................................................30 §12-2. Force of common law.................................................................................................................30 §12-3. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-4. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-5. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-6. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-7. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-8. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-9. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................31 §12-10. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984...........................................................31 §12-11. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984...........................................................31 §12-12. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984...........................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus Criton G
    Cyprus Criton G. Tornaritis* The Republic of Cyprus (Kypriake Demokratia _ Crown Colony ceased. 1 Its territory comprises the Kibris Cum_huriyeti) w~ established as an independ­ entirety of the Island of Cyprus, except the Sov­ ent sovereign republic with a presidential regime ereign Base Areas at Episkopi and Dhekelia over on 16 Aug. 196<> when its Constitution came into which the British sovereignty was retained, and it force and the British sovereignty over Cyprus as a is one and indivisible. I. CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM 1. Nationality 3. State Organs All citizens ofthe United Kingdom and the Colonies a. General structure. - The main state organs are the who were born in Cyprus after 5 Nov. 1914 or who President of the Republic who is a Greek and is became such citizens, by virtue of the Cyprus elected by the Greek Community; the Vice-President (Annexation) Orders-in-Council or who are de­ ofthe Republic who is a Turk and is elected by the scended in the male line from any such person and Turkish Commmlity; the Council ofMinisters con­ who were ordinarily resident in Cyprus during the sisting often ministers, seven Greek and three Turk, five years immediately preceding 16 Aug. 1960 be­ nominated by the President and the \Gee-President became citizens ofthe Republic. 2 By the Citizenship of the Republic respectively; the independent offi­ of the Republic Law, 1967 (no. 43 of 1967) in force cers (the Attorney-General of the Republic, the since 1 Dec. r¢8, persons born in the Republic after Auditor-General and the Governor of the Issuing 16 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant Armenia*, ** International Covenant On
    United Nations CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 November 2010 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant Joint second and third periodic reports of States parties Armenia*, ** [28 April 2010] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. ** Annexes can be consulted in the files of the Secretariat. GE.10-46857 (E) 031210 CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction........................................................................................................ 1–12 3 II. Implementation of the Covenant.......................................................................... 13–670 5 Article 1 ............................................................................................................. 13–66 5 Article 2 ............................................................................................................. 67–106 12 Article 3 ............................................................................................................. 107–152 18 Article 4 ............................................................................................................. 153–175 24 Article 5 ............................................................................................................. 176–179
    [Show full text]
  • Seafarer Subject Guide Maritime Lien for Seafarers
    SEAFARER SUBJECT GUIDE MARITIME LIEN FOR SEAFARERS’ WAGES IN CYPRUS This Guide deals with the rights of seafarers of any nationality to unpaid or underpaid wages in respect of Cypriot flagged ships, and foreign ships which are in the ports of Cyprus. These rights can be enforced in the Supreme Court of Cyprus in its admiralty jurisdiction, where they are secured and preferred by maritime liens and enforced by the arrest and forced (judicial) sale of the ships. This document is not intended to be legal advice, nor does it constitute legal advice. If a seafarer intends to claim his wages, he is strongly advised to consult a lawyer qualified to practise in Cyprus. *A full text version of this Subject Guide including footnotes will become available for subscription in due course. In the meantime if there is a specific inquiry on any Subject Guide, please contact SRI. 1. What is the maritime lien for seafarers’ wages? How is it enforced? 1.1 There is no statutory definition of a maritime lien for seafarers’ wages. The common law definition of a maritime lien is ‘a privileged claim over a vessel or other maritime property in respect of services rendered to, or injury caused by, that vessel or maritime property.’ 1.2 To enforce a maritime lien, a seafarer must invoke the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Cyprus by filing an action in rem against the res (that is, the vessel) or an action in personam against the owners and/or managers and/or operators of the vessel. In either case the court must first accept that it has jurisdiction to hear such a claim.
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    INTERNATIONAL COVENANT Distr. GENERAL ON CIVIL AND CCPR/o/l/Add.28 POLITICAL RIGHTS 26 June 1978 Original ; ENGLISH Human Rights Committee Fourth session CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVEHAlff Initial reports of States Parties due in 1977 Addendum CYPRU [27.May 1978] Part I General Almost all the rights recognized in the present Covenant are protected by the constitution of the Republic of Cyprus which is the Supreme Law of the Republic by virtue of Article 179 of the constitution. Moreover the present Covenant which has been approved by law 14-Qf 1969 of the Republic of Cyprus, forms part of the municipal law of Cyprus and with superior force to any other municipal law (Article 169(3 ) of the constitution). In Part II of this report each right recognized in the present Covenant shall be examined separately, setting out the corresponding provision of the constitution as well as the legislative or other measures which are in force and which give effect to certain provisions of the Covenant. The answer to all the queries set out in paragraph 3 Part I of the "General Guidelines regarding the form and contents of reports from State Parties under article 40 of the Covenant" .(adopted by the Human Rights Committee at its 2nd Session - August 1977).shall be given in Part II of this report. 2. Under article 183 of the Constitution, of Cyprus (the text, of which was given to the Committee at its 2nd session by the Representative of Cyprus) the Government of Cyprus has poxrer to declare by proclamation a state of emergency and suspend certain, .articles of the Constitution to the same effect as the provisions of article 4 of the Covenant.
    [Show full text]
  • Converging Currents Custom and Human Rights in the Pacific 
    September 2006, Wellington, New Zealand | STUDY PAPER 17 CoNvERgiNg CURRENTS Custom and human rights in the paCifiC The Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand. its purpose is to help achieve law that is just, principled, and accessible, and that reflects the heritage and aspirations of the peoples of New Zealand. The Commissioners are: Right Honourable Sir geoffrey Palmer – President Dr Warren Young – Deputy President Honourable Justice Eddie Durie Helen Aikman qC The Manager of the Law Commission is Brigid Corcoran The office of the Law Commission is at 89 The Terrace, Wellington Postal address: Po Box 2590, Wellington 6001, New Zealand Document Exchange Number: sp 23534 Telephone: (04) 473–3453, Facsimile: (04) 914–4760 Email: [email protected] internet: www.lawcom.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data New Zealand. Law Commission. Custom and human rights in the Pacific / Law Commission. (Study paper, 1174-9776 ; 17) iSBN 1-877316-08-3 1. Customary law—oceania. 2. Human rights—oceania. 3. Civil rights—oceania. i. Title. ii. Series: Study paper (New Zealand. Law Commission) 340.5295—dc 22 Study Paper/Law Commission, Wellington 2006 iSSN 1174-9776 iSBN 1-877316-08-3 This study paper may be cited as NZLC SP17 This study paper is also available on the internet at the Commission’s website: www.lawcom.govt.nz <http://www.lawcom.govt.nz> LawCommissionStudyPaper He Poroporoaki The New Zealand Law Commission acknowledges with deep regret the passing of two notable Pacific leaders shortly before the printing of this study, the Maori queen and the King of Tonga.
    [Show full text]