DOCSLIB.ORG

Aerological Observations Rivers and Floods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aerological Observations Rivers and Floods July 1939 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW 223 AEROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS [Aerological Division, D. M. LITTLEin charge] By B. FRANCISDASHIELL NoTE.-The test and tables for this sect,ion will be published in a later issue of the REVIEW.--E~. RIVERS AND FLOODS [River and Flood Division, MERRILLBERNARD in Charge] By THOMABS. SOUTHWICK Rainfall during June was generally above normal in period June 22 to 28. Except for the lower reaches of the eastern part of the country except for the Northeast. the Grand River, the period above flood &age at each Rainfall was much less abundant in July, above normal point was only 1 or 2 days. Stages were slight to mod- rainfall occurrin only in the Ohio Valley re.gion, portions erat,e with little damage reporte,d. of the sout,h At5 antic coast and the Far West. In t,he In July, local rains caused slight flooding at Chillicothe, Northeast, rainfall was very scanty and streams in New Mo., on the Grand River on the 5th and at Beloit, Kans., England were at quite low stages. on the Solomon River on the 37th. There was no damage. Floods were not numerous nor especially severe except OhB&n,.-Cyclonic development over Ohio on June for an extraordinary “flash” flood m Kentucky early m 18 caused heavy shoN-ers in the upper portions of the July. The floods during June a.nd July were generally Scioto and Olentangy Rivers. Tlie rainfall averaged the result of locally intense rainstorms characteristic of betwee,n 4 and 5 inches, but the low stages prevailing at summer. Flood stages were usually of short duration the time caused only minor flooding to take place. There and of local extent except in the low lying rivers of t,lie was sonie damage to prospective crops. I ower Mississippi basin. A local, but devastating “flash” flood occurred in Detailed damage figures are given in a table at t’he end eastern Kentucky on July 5. Very heavy rains resulted of this article. from t,linnderstorms associated with a cold front,. The Atlantic Slope drainage.-Locdly heavy rains occwred towns of Farmers, Clearfield, Morehead, and Keck were over the Sout,h Atlantic St,at,es from July 19 to 22 in inundn.tec1 by the sudden overflow. There were 79 lives association with frontal activity. St)reamswere at fairly lost according t,o the American Red Cross. The flood low stages and flood st,age was exceeded only on the occurred on small streams on which the Weather Bureau Cape Fear and Neuse Rivers. Flooding was slight wit,h does not maintain river gages; hence no stages are listed. practically no damage. This disast,rous flood is described by W. C. Devereaux, East Gulj of Mexico rlraina.ge.-High stages continued official in charge at the Cincinnat,i, Ohio Weather Bure.au to prevail on the Tombigbee Riwr wit,h flood stage being Office as follows: atbained during the first week in June at some stat.ions Torrential rains, varying in amount from 2.5 inches to more than and throughout its length at various dat,es from June 16 9 inches, fell in a few hours over portions of eastern Kentucky during to 28. These floods were the result of the rises of hhy the night of July 4-5, 1939. The topography of this section of the occasioned by the heavy rains during the last 2 weeks of State is mountainous. The mountain ranges extend in a northeast- hhy, augmented by the rainfall from frequent and widely southwest direction a.nd are separat.ed from each other by deep and narrow valleys. It is therefort not surprising that rainfalls of distributed thundershowers of June. Stages were mod- the proportions mentioned above, falling in from 25 to 4 hours, erate on the Tombigbee, although extreme stages were should cause the norinally placid creeks and small streams to become reported on some of the Northeastern t,ributaries. How- raging tarrent,s causing destruction to life and property. The ever, these floods, oc.curring as they did during the grow- floods were nearly all confincd to the creeks and sinall streams enter- ing the upper Licking and upper Kentucky Rivers. The only river ing season, caused widespren.d c!ama.ge, estiniatecl at over gaging station on the Licking River in this district to report flood 3 millions of dollars. Approslmately 200,000 acres of conditions wm at Farmers, KV., where a crest of 25.25 feet was land were inunda.tec1. recorded at 10:06 a. m., on July 5th, 0.25 foot, above flood. At The Bogue. Chitto aad Pearl Rivers went above flood Jackson on the upper Kentucky River 3.75 inches of rain fell be- tween 3:15 a. ni. and 8 a. in. on JuI~5th. The crest stage of the stage early in June. St’ages and consequent damago river was 20.40 feet, at 6 p. m. on the 5th (flood stage 28 feet). were moderate. Mississippi System- Upper Alississippi Basi.n.-A pro- Heavy rainfall associated with a low that’ traversed gression of lows across the basin from June 11 to 23 Indiana on the night of Jul 17-15 result,ed in one of the resulted in enough rainfall to raise the streams, but t.lie flashiest floods of record in tK e middle upper reaches of the only flood situation was in the lower Chippewa Rirer. Wabash River. Rainfall amount,s, in a rela,t,ively small The river at Durand, Wis., was only, slightly abo\7e flood arm centere.d over Covington, Ind., averaged 3 inches. stage on June 22 and 23, and only slight damage resulted Tlie Wa.bn.shRiver at Covingt’orirose 11.6 feet in 24 hours, from the flooding of basements. but fnrt8iinntelythe local est’ent of the rn.in and the low In nort,heastern Missouri t,he passing of a low resulted summer stages then prevailing prevented other than minor in heavy and fairly wide,spread rain: on the night of flooding. Moderate damage was reported. June 20-21. This rain c.aused a rapid rise in the Salt White, Arkansas, a.nd Red Riaer Basins.-The White River which resulted in the flooding of considerable farm River be,low- Georgetown, Ark., was slightly above flood land and exte.nsive damage to crops and other farm stage at t8hebeginning of June from the rains of April and property . hclay. hloderate st,ages on the lower Mississippi River The Salt River we,nt slightly above flood stage on during the first hdf of May delayed run-off in the lower July 26 as the result of thunderst,orrn ra.ins. There mas White River. This condition, augmented by normal nominal damage to prospective c.rops. rainfall during May and early June, maintained the river He,avy showers resul.ted m the Republican, Big Blue, above. flood stage for about, 2 weeks. Little damage wa.s and Grand Rivers going above floodstage during the reported. 224 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW July 1939 Heavy rnins over the North and South Canadian Rivers Table of .flood stagt-s during Jiine and July 1939 during the last 10 days of June caused flash floods at several - localities. Moderate damage was reported. The North Lho\~flood staga3- Crest ilood dates Canadian River at Canton, Olila., went slightly above flood River and station .- stage again on July 4. >tag Frori- To- Xage 1,ute The Sulphur River nt Rillgo Crossing, Tex., went -____ __ - slightly above flood stage on June 2, as the result of ATL.4NTIC SI.OP% PRAIY.4C.E moderate local rains. Capc Fear: Lark No. 2, Elizn- Ffet R'ct I Lower nilississippi Basin .-The Coldwn ter River at hrthtown. N. C. ........... 2n July 23 July '73 Y2.U July 21. Coldwater, Miss., went slightly above flood sta,ae from Nruse: Smithfic!d. N. C~ ............ 13 July ?I ~ ,lo 14.0 July 22. June 13 to 16 and ngain from July4 to 6 as the result of Ooldsborn. N. C ............. 14 ,Iul>- ?% July 2; 1s. 4 July 26. local rains. EAST GULF OF YEXICO DB.4INAGE The Tallahatchie River rose above flood stage at SMnn Tombi@er: Lake, Miss., on June 25 from moderate rains and reniaind Ah~rde~n,PJiss.. ........... 34 Junc I9 June 32 Ri. 0 June 2n. Junr 3 June i 41.4 Junr 5. 4. above flood stage until July 12. The crest stage of 28.5 Lnck No. D+mopolis. 413 39 June 18 June 25 43.7 June 22. May 31 .run+ 13 43. 4 June 5. W~S No. 3. Ala.-. .......... 33 feet was not excessive, but n considerable acreagc. Lock Juur 15 June 29 45. 7 Junc 72. flooded. This overflow, coming as it did during the grow- Lock No. 3. .%In ........... <ti dune 211 .June 21 46. D June 23. 3 I3 22.5 June 9. Lock No. I. Ma. ...... 31 lune June ing season, resulted in an appreciable amount of daniage. June ?I) June 25 22. 9 .rune 24-25, West Guy Merico drainage.-Heavy rains over a por- BnFuP Chittn: Franklintnl;. hln 11 .Tim= 4 Jnnp li 13. ti Jane .l. of Prarl: rtwl i{i~v.La. ........ 12 June 14 IF,. li June s. tion of the upper watershed of the Colorado River caiised Jnue 1 flash floods at Snyder, Tex., and Colorado City, Tea., BtIRSISSIFPI RYITBW on June 20 and 21. As the Weather Bureau does not main- Upper AWssi~,?i:~piHuoiii tain any river gages in this section no stages are listed. Chiltpewa: Durnnd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FLOOD of AUGUST 1935 Dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER Z < 5
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 869 FLOOD OF AUGUST 1935 dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER o O z < 5 BY i ;> ^, C. V. YOUNGQUIST AND W. B. WITH SECTIONS ON THE ASSOCIATES METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOOT ^ ;j . » BY * V WALDO E. SMITH AND A. K. SHOWALTEK 2. Prepared in cooperation with the * ^* FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRAflCg^ OF PUBLIC WORKS ' -o j; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 jFor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. G. - * * « Price 40 cents (paper) CONTENTS Pag« Abstract---.--_-_-__-__-___--______.-__-_---_---_-__-_--_-__-.-_._ I Introduction.______________________________________________________ 1 Administration and personnel---_______--_-_____-__--____________-__ 3 Acknowledgments ________-________-----_--__--__-_________________ 3 Geography _ ____________________________________________________ 6 Topography, drainage, and transportation________________________ 6 Rainfall...--_---.-__-------.-_--------__..---_-----------_---- 7 Population, industry, and mineral resources_---_-__--_________--__ 8 Flood control-___-_-___-__-_-__-____-_--_-_-__--_--__.____--_- S General features of the flood-_______________________________________ 9 Damage.-__-_______--____-__--__--__-_-____--_______-____--__ IT Meteorologic and hydrologic conditions, by Waldo E. Smith____________ 19 General features of the storm.___-____-__________---_____--__--_ 19 Records of precipitation._______________________________________ 21 Antecedent
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier History of Coshocton
    Frontier History of Coshocton By Scott E. Butler, Ph. D. Frontier History of Coshocton First printing 2020 Library of Congress Control Number: 2020915741 Copyright 2020 Scott E. Butler Copyright of photographs, maps and illustrations remains with persons or institutions credited. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-578-75019-4 Printed by Carlisle Printing Sugarcreek, Ohio Cover art is a digital photo of an oil-on-canvas painting by the author’s father, Dr. John G. Butler, a veterinarian in Coshocton for many years. He enjoyed painting animals. Manufactured in the United States of America on acid-free paper. Open Your Eyes and Ears and Clear Your Mind and Listen to What I Have to Say – Adapted from customary opening words of northeast Native American conferences among tribes and nations and with white people in the 18th Century. Dedicated to the people of Coshocton, that present and future generations may know the truth about the grand history of their place in the world. Contents Page # Preface i Acknowledgements ii Illustrations iii Maps iv Terminology v Sources vi Chapter Page # 1. Introduction & the Pre-European Era 1 2. Mary Harris 21 3. Early Habitation of Ohio after 1701 40 4. The Conflict Begins 56 5. The War Years in Ohio 66 6. Recovery in Coshoctonia 78 7. Delaware Survival in Coshoctonia 107 8. Delaware Revival in Coshoctonia 118 9. Conversions and Conflicts 133 10. Coshoctonia on January 1, 1775 168 11. Resolution and Revolution 178 12. Lichtenau & New Leaders 197 13. Peace and War 209 14. Alliance and Breakdown 234 15. Fort Laurens 253 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to the Year 2000 Ohio Water Resource Inventory Sept 11
    Appendices to the Year 2000 Ohio Water Resource Inventory Bob Taft Governor, State of Ohio Christopher Jones Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 1049 Lazarus Government Center, 122 S. Front Street Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Sept 11, 2000 Appendix A. OHIOSPORTFISH CONSUMPTIONADVISORY OHIODEPARTMENTOFHEALTHYEAR2000 FISHINGSEASON What Health Benefits do I get From Eating Sport Fish? Fish are nutritious and good to eat. Many doctors suggest that eating one half-pound of fish each week helps to prevent heart disease. Almost any kind of fish may have real health benefits when it replaces a high-fat source of protein in the diet. Fish eaten often provide valuable vitamins and minerals, high-quality protein, and beneficial oils that are low in saturated fat. Why is a Fish Consumption Advisory Needed? While most Ohio sport fish are of high quality, low levels of chemicals like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, and lead have been found in some fish from certain waters. To ensure the continued good health of Ohioans, the Ohio Department of Health offers an advisory for how often these fish can be safely eaten. An advisory is advice, and should not be viewed as law or regulation. It is intended to help anglers and their families make educated choices about: Where you fish, what types of fish you eat, how to limit the amount and frequency of fish you consume, and how you prepare fish for cooking. By following these advisories, you can get the health benefits of fish and reduce unwanted contaminants. What Groups are Most Sensitive to Contaminatants? Contaminants in fish can be harmful to people of all ages, but the fetus and young children are especially sensitive to contaminants because their organs and systems are not yet fully developed.
    [Show full text]
  • River of the Little Owls
    at Kenyon College Field Notes July 2014 Vol. 18 / No.3 July, August, September Before the State Route 229 that we know today, a wagon road followed the river between Mount Vernon and Gambier. This photo appeared in William Bodine’s 1891 “The Kenyon Book.” change the name back to the melodic original, which thankfully stuck.1 Though it makes for an interesting tale, thousands of years prior to the river’s naming a much larger regime of change led to its birth from a immense sheet of ice known as the Wisconsin glacier. Prior to its advance, the Ko- kosing River did not exist, nor the Ohio River. Instead, the great Teays River flowed from east to west through the center of the state. River of the Little Owls The Wisconsin glacier advanced 20,000 years ago over the Teays valley, scrap- ping, grinding and trapping all manner The State Scenic Kokosing River winds through the of earth and stone under its frozen heart of our community and colors our past with mass. As it receded, great volumes of melt water cut new river valleys, in- tales of ice, exploration, and survival. cluding the Kokosing’s. Boulders and The first of a two-part series, by Heather Doherty crushed rock were also released from the ice and deposited on the river’s edges. The Kokosing River runs through the that explores how the river connects us heart of Knox County and Mount to our past and touches us today. Fast-forward to 1890, and that glacial Vernon, and has long been central to debris becomes an important local com- life in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Mohican Country Geographic References –
    YOUR GUIDE TO MOHICAN COUNTRY GEOGRAPHIC REFERENCES By IRV OSLIN Black Fork of the Mohican River — Originates near Shelby, flowing through Richland and Ashland counties. It is impounded by Charles Mill Dam. Downstream of the dam, Black Fork flows under Ohio 603 and Ohio 39, through Perrysville and Loudonville (including the liveries south of the village Ohio 3). The Native American village of Greentown was located on the stretch between Rocky Fork and Perrysville, downstream of County Road 1075. Rocky Fork of the Mohican River flows into Black Fork downstream from Charles Mill Dam. Rocky Fork flows down from Mansfield. Rocky Fork flows under Ohio 603 between Ohio 95 and Ohio 39. Charles Mill Dam — Impounds Black Fork of the Mohican River south of Mifflin. Charles Mill Lake — Not to be confused with Charles Mill Dam. The lake is the body of water behind the dam. Note, Charles Mill Lake and Charles Mill Lake Park are managed by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District. The dam is managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is NOT Charles Mill Reservoir, as some call it. Charles Mill Lake Park — A Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District-run park on the shores of Charles Mill Lake. Note, the campground, marina and beach are in Ashland County. The western half of the lake and Eagle Point Campground (on Ohio 430) are in Richland County. Cinnamon Lake — The lake itself is an impoundment of Muddy Fork of the Mohican River. The privately run residential community surrounding it is the third- largest in the county after the City of Ashland and Loudonville.
    [Show full text]
  • The Walhonding Valley Late Prehistoric Sites Project: the Analysis of Flotation Samples from the Crawford and Tri-Mac/Olinger Sites in Coshocton County, Ohio
    Current Research in Ohio Archaeology 2014 Nigel Brush and P. Nick Kardulias www.ohioarchaeology.org The Walhonding Valley Late Prehistoric Sites Project: The Analysis of Flotation Samples from the Crawford and Tri-Mac/Olinger Sites in Coshocton County, Ohio Nigel Brush, Ashland University and P. Nick Kardulias, College of Wooster Introduction The Walhonding River is formed by the junction of the Kokosing River and the Mohican River near the village of Walhonding in west central Coshocton County, Ohio. After flowing some 18 miles to the east, the Walhonding River merges with the Tuscarawas River to form the Muskingum River near the center of the county at the town of Coshocton. Along the hillsides above the Walhonding River are extensive outcrops of Upper Mercer Flint that reach a maximum thickness of 17 feet near the Village of Nellie. These flint outcrops were heavily utilized by native peoples for tool and weapon production throughout the prehistoric period, and the terraces along the valley are littered with the remains of workshops, camp sites, and villages. Walhonding Valley Late Prehistoric Sites Project Fieldwork in the Walhonding Valley was begun in 1990 by Jim Morton and Nigel Brush. By 2006 this work had grown into the Walhonding Valley Late Prehistoric Sites Project. The purpose of this project is to examine how native peoples living in the Walhonding Valley adapted to three periods of short-term climate change that occurred during a one-thousand-year period from A.D. 700 to 1700: the Dark Age Cold Period (A.D. 400 to 900), the Medieval Warm Period (A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (484.02
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 26, NO.5, PAGES 1093-1098, MAY 1990 Evaluating Dam Safety Retrofits With Uncertain Benefits: The Case of Mohawk Dam (Walhonding River, Ohio) DANIEL RESENDIZ-CARRILLO Department ofEngineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania LESTER B. LAVE Graduate School ofIndustrial Administration and Department ofEngineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Mohawk Dam, part of the Muskingum basin flood control system, was built in 1938 and is operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). Since this high-hazard dam could not survive a probable maximum flood (PMF), the Corps conducted a study to determine the least expensive means ofenabling the dam to survive a PMF. Applying a previously proposed framework to select the social cost minimizing capacity ofa dam, we show that Mohawk Darn had sufficient capacity that any retrofit has a social cost larger than expected benefits. Sensitivity analyses were performed adjusting the peak flow distribution, the costs of modification, and downstream flood damage, as well as the possibility of loss of life. For any reasonable value of these variables the conclusion does not change that the structure already met so high a safety goal regarding extreme floods that no retrofit is needed. Using risk-based methods to perform reservoir safety evaluations, as recommended by a National Research Council committee in 1985, is indeed feasible. Furthermore, their use provides valuable insight and guidance into the selection of strategies to enhance the safety of dams. We have previously proposed a framework to evaluate the 1 (EVTl). The estimated return periods for various peak implications of the current safety goal that high-hazard dams flows (and the corresponding standard errors) for the four must survive a probable maximum flood (PMF) [Resendiz­ fitted distributions are shown in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Cat's Paw Pearlymussel (Epioblasma Obliquata Obliquata)
    Purple Cat’s Paw Pearlymussel (Epioblasma obliquata obliquata) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Midwest Region Ecological Services Field Office Columbus, Ohio April 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Reviewers ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review: ................................................................................. 1 1.3 Background: ................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy ........................................... 2 2.2 Recovery Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status ........................................................................ 6 2.4 Synthesis..................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 RESULTS .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Booklet
    2019 Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory March 2019 2019 Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Fish for Your Health: Overall Advice on Fish Consumption .................................................................................................. 4 Fish: A Healthy Part of Your Diet ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Choose Better Fish .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 “Do Not Eat” Advisories ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Serving Size ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Prepare it Healthy .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Sensitive Populations ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Mohican River Watershed
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Mohican River Watershed Draft Report for Public Review Division of Surface Water December 2, 2014 Photo caption: Clear Fork of the Mohican River at Benedict Road bridge outside of the Village of Butler. Mohican River Watershed TMDLs Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.1 The Clean Water Act Requirement to Address Impaired Waters ..................................... 14 1.2 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................... 19 1.3 Organization of Report ..................................................................................................... 20 2 Characteristics and Expectations of the Watershed ............................................................... 21 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ................................................................................................ 21 2.1.1 Population and Distribution ................................................................................. 21 2.1.2 Land Use............................................................................................................... 22 2.1.3 Point Source Discharges ...................................................................................... 22 2.1.4 Public Drinking Water Supplies ............................................................................ 23 2.2 Water Quality Standards..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District
    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. XXXVIII MAY, 1938 No. 3 THE MUSKINGUM WATERSHED CONSERVANCY DISTRICT CHARLES C. HUNTINGTON Department of Geography, The Ohio State University The Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District is an important example of co-operation for resources conservation by the Federal Government, a State, and the people of a local political subdivision. The Muskingum Watershed, a part of the Mississippi Drainage Basin, is the largest in Ohio, including 8,038 square miles. This area, together with the 289 square miles drained by Duck Creek, constitutes about one-fifth of the area of the state. Physiographically, it lies mostly in the unglaciated Appalachian Plateau, the northern and western part, however, being within the glaciated portion. (Plate I.) Politically, the Conservancy District consists of eighteen counties forming a political subdivision whose boundaries follow roughly those of the drainage basin. From an economic and social point of view, this Con- servancy District, created June 3, 1933, under the Conservancy Act of Ohio, passed soon after the great flood of 1913,1 includes approximately half the major land-use problem areas of the State.2 This very hilly section of Ohio was the first settled, but contains large areas not well adapted to arable farming on account of the difficulty of using modern farm machinery, the serious erosion due to the rapid run-off from long denuded slopes and the impoverished soils mostly of sandstone and shale origin. The average yearly rainfall of the area is approximately 39 inches, but the run-off is high especially during the winter and Massed February 6, 1914, Page's Annotated Ohio General Code, Sees.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA List of Special Waters April 2014
    ist of Ohio’s Special Waters, As of 4/16/2014 Water Body Name - SegmenL ting Description Hydrologic Unit Special Flows Into Drainage Basin Code(s) (HUC) Category* Alum Creek - headwaters to West Branch (RM 42.8) 05060001 Big Walnut Creek Scioto SHQW 150 Anderson Fork - Grog Run (RM 11.02) to the mouth 05090202 Caesar Creek Little Miami SHQW 040 Archers Fork Little Muskingum River Central Ohio SHQW 05030201 100 Tributaries Arney Run - Black Run (RM 1.64) to the mouth 05030204 040 Clear Creek Hocking SHQW Ashtabula River - confluence of East and West Fork (RM 27.54) Lake Erie Ashtabula SHQW, State to East 24th street bridge (RM 2.32) 04110003 050 Scenic river Auglaize River - Kelly Road (RM 77.32) to Jennings Creek (RM Maumee River Maumee SHQW 47.02) 04100007 020 Auglaize River – Jennings Creek (RM 47.02) to Ottawa River (RM Maumee River Maumee Species 33.26) Aukerman Creek Twin Creek Great Miami Species Aurora Branch - State Route 82 (RM 17.08) to the mouth Chagrin River Chagrin OSW-E, State 04110003 020 Scenic river Bantas Fork Twin Creek Great Miami OSW-E 05080002 040 Baughman Creek 04110004 010 Grand River Grand SHQW Beech Fork 05060002 Salt Creek Scioto SHQW 070 Bend Fork – Packsaddle run (RM 9.7) to the mouth 05030106 110 Captina Creek Central Ohio SHQW Tributaries Big Darby Creek Scioto River Scioto OSW-E 05060001 190, 05060001 200, 05060001 210, 05060001 220 Big Darby Creek – Champaign-Union county line to U.S. route Scioto River Scioto State Scenic 40 bridge, northern boundary of Battelle-Darby Creek metro river park to mouth Big Darby Creek – Champaign-Union county line to Conrail Scioto River Scioto National Wild railroad trestle (0.9 miles upstream of U.S.
    [Show full text]