Samuel Baker The University of Texas at Austin
[email protected] 5/13/2009 Scott’s Stoic Characters: Ethics, Sentiment, and Irony in The Antiquary, Guy Mannering, and “The Author of Waverley” Published in Modern Language Quarterly (2009) 70 (4): 443–471: Cite only from published version. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/10.1215/00267929-2009-011 Whomever one reads on the question, it seems that Walter Scott created “the classical form of the historical novel” by standing at a locus of contradiction. According to the most influential such accounts, Scott “portrayed objectively the ruination of past social formations, despite all his human sympathy for, and artistic sensitivity to, the splendid, heroic qualities which they contained”; he could accomplish such feats of mediation because he was “two men … both the prudent Briton and the passionate Scot."1 These accounts of Scott’s contradictory investments–by Georg Lukács and David Daiches, respectively–find an emblem in the title Virginia Woolf gave her essay on Scott's late-life journal. Referring to how Scott installed modern lighting at his pseudo- medieval estate, Woolf calls her piece “Gas at Abbotsford.”2 Such formulations became 1 Georg Lukács, The Historical Novel [1937], Hannah and Stanley Mitchell, tr. (Lincoln, Neb.: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1983), pp.54-55; David Daiches, “Scott’s Achievement as a Novelist” [1951], in Literary Essays (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1967), 92. 2 Virginia Woolf, “Gas at Abbotsford” [1940], in Collected Essays, 4 vols. (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1967), 1:128-138. touchstones for Scott criticism some decades ago.3 Many critics since have adopted the concept of a split Scott that, whatever their other differences, Lukács, Daiches, and Woolf share.