DOCSLIB.ORG

Network Readiness Index 2020 Denmark

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Network Readiness Index 2020 Denmark Network Readiness Index 2020 Denmark The Network Readiness Index (NRI) is one of the leading global indices on the application and impact of information and communication technology (ICT) in economies around the world. In its latest version of 2020 the NRI Report maps the network-based readiness landscape of 134 economies based on their performances in four different pillars: Technology, People, Governance, and Impact. Each of these pillars is itself comprised of three sub-pillars (see Figure 1) that have been populated by a total of 60 variables. Figure 1: The NRI 2020 model Global NRI position of Denmark Denmark ranks 2nd out of the 134 economies included in the NRI 2020 (Figure 2). Its main strength relates to People. The greatest scope for improvement, meanwhile, concerns Technology and Impact. Figure 2: Denmark global ranking, overall and by pillar 1 Performance at sub-pillar level When it comes to sub-pillars, the strongest showings of Denmark relate to Governments, Trust and Businesses, among others (Table 1). More could be done, though, to improve the economy's performances in the Economy, Access and Inclusion sub-pillars. Table 1: Denmark rankings by sub-pillar Sub-pillar Rank Sub-pillar Rank Governments 1 Individuals 7 Trust 1 Regulation 8 Businesses 4 Future Technologies 9 Quality of Life 4 Economy 12 Content 5 Access 13 SDG Contribution 6 Inclusion 13 NRI score and income Figure 3 shows the position of Denmark in terms of both NRI score and GDP per capita (PPP). The trend line shows the expected NRI score given an economy's income level. As can be seen, Denmark is well above the trend line, which suggests that it has a greater network readiness than would be expected given its income level. Figure 3: NRI score and GDP per capita PPP (log) Note: SWE = Sweden (rank: 1), SGP = Singapore (3), CHN = China (40), IND = India (88). USA is ranked 8th. Denmark belongs to the group of high-income countries, where the best performer is Sweden (SWE). The top performer of its region-Europe-is also Sweden (SWE). 2 Performance against its income group and region High-income countries Denmark is ranked 2nd in the group of high-income countries (Figure 4, left panel). In terms of pillar performance, it has a score higher than the income group average in each of the four pillars. At the sub-pillar level, it has a higher score than the average of high-income countries in all of them. Europe Denmark is ranked 2nd within Europe (Figure 4, right panel). It outperforms its region in each of the four pillars. With regard to sub-pillars, it has a higher score than the regional average in each of the twelve sub-pillars. Figure 4: Performance of Denmark against its income group and region, overall and by pillar Table 2: Denmark scores vs. averages of its income group and region, overall and by pillar Dimension Denmark High-income countries Europe NRI 82.19 66.82 64.21 Technology 79.71 62.51 59.93 People 80.81 62.72 59.89 Governance 89.80 75.41 72.98 Impact 78.45 66.63 64.04 3 Strongest and weakest indicators The indicators where Denmark performs particularly well include 4G mobile network coverage, Internet access in schools, and R&D expenditure by governments and higher education (Table 3). By contrast, the economy's weakest indicators include SDG 5: Gender Equality, ICT regulatory environment, and International Internet bandwidth. Table 3: Top-ranked and bottom-ranked indicators of Denmark Strongest indicators Rank Weakest indicators Rank 4G mobile network coverage 1 Cybersecurity 23 Internet access in schools 1 Healthy life expectancy at birth 24 R&D expenditure by governments and higher 1 Gender gap in Internet use 26 education Secure Internet servers 1 Privacy protection by law content 30 Internet shopping 1 Mobile tariffs 31 e-commerce legislation 1 Availability of local online content 33 Freedom to make life choices 1 High-tech exports 34 Firms with website 2 International Internet bandwidth 41 Online access to financial account 2 ICT regulatory environment 43 Socioeconomic gap in use of digital payments 2 SDG 5: Gender Equality 48 4 NRI 2020 At-A-Glance: Denmark Network Readiness Index Rank: 2 (out of 134) Score: 82.19 Pillar/sub-pillar Rank Score Pillar/sub-pillar Rank Score A. Technology pillar 5 79.71 C. Governance pillar 2 89.80 1st sub-pillar: Access 13 86.73 1st sub-pillar: Trust 1 97.17 2nd sub-pillar: Content 5 82.48 2nd sub-pillar: Regulation 8 88.61 3rd sub-pillar: Future Technologies 9 69.92 3rd sub-pillar: Inclusion 13 83.61 B. People pillar 1 80.81 D. Impact pillar 5 78.45 1st sub-pillar: Individuals 7 73.90 1st sub-pillar: Economy 12 58.05 2nd sub-pillar: Businesses 4 79.36 2nd sub-pillar: Quality of Life 4 92.99 3rd sub-pillar: Governments 1 89.16 3rd sub-pillar: SDG Contribution 6 84.32 The Network Readiness Index in detail Indicator Rank Score Indicator Rank Score A. Technology pillar 5 79.71 C. Governance pillar 2 89.80 1st sub-pillar: Access 13 86.73 1st sub-pillar: Trust 1 97.17 1.1.1 Mobile tariffs 31 77.33 3.1.1 Secure Internet servers 1 100.00 1.1.2 Handset prices 20 67.49 3.1.2 Cybersecurity 23 91.44 1.1.3 Internet access 8 96.99 3.1.3 Online access to financial account 2 97.24 1.1.4 4G mobile network coverage 1 100.00 3.1.4 Internet shopping 1 100.00 1.1.5 Fixed-broadband subscriptions 22 93.95 2nd sub-pillar: Regulation 8 88.61 1.1.6 International Internet bandwidth 41 71.35 3.2.1 Regulatory quality 13 88.35 1.1.7 Internet access in schools 1 100.00 3.2.2 ICT regulatory environment 43 88.81 2nd sub-pillar: Content 5 82.48 3.2.3 Legal framework's adaptability to emerging technologies NA NA 1.2.1 GitHub commits 7 71.76 3.2.4 e-commerce legislation 1 100.00 1.2.2 Wikipedia edits 17 82.34 3.2.5 Privacy protection by law content 30 77.29 1.2.3 Internet domain registrations * * 3rd sub-pillar: Inclusion 13 83.61 1.2.4 Mobile apps development 7 92.35 3.3.1 E-Participation 9 96.30 3rd sub-pillar: Future Technologies 9 69.92 3.3.2 Socioeconomic gap in use of digital payments 2 99.79 1.3.1 Adoption of emerging technologies 13 84.22 3.3.3 Availability of local online content 33 79.08 1.3.2 Investment in emerging technologies 14 76.91 3.3.4 Gender gap in Internet use 26 66.36 1.3.3 ICT PCT patent applications 15 63.12 3.3.5 Rural gap in use of digital payments 19 76.53 1.3.4 Computer software spending 12 54.50 D. Impact pillar 5 78.45 1.3.5 Robot density 7 70.85 1st sub-pillar: Economy 12 58.05 B. People pillar 1 80.81 4.1.1 Medium and high-tech industry 8 69.29 1st sub-pillar: Individuals 7 73.90 4.1.2 High-tech exports 34 26.32 2.1.1 Internet users 6 97.93 4.1.3 PCT patent applications 8 63.69 2.1.2 Active mobile-broadband subscriptions 10 53.95 4.1.4 Labor productivity per employee 11 72.88 2.1.3 Use of virtual social networks 22 71.13 4.1.5 Prevalence of gig economy NA NA 2.1.4 Tertiary enrollment 18 58.77 2nd sub-pillar: Quality of Life 4 92.99 2.1.5 Adult literacy rate NA NA 4.2.1 Happiness 3 98.28 2.1.6 ICT skills 9 87.71 4.2.2 Freedom to make life choices 1 100.00 2nd sub-pillar: Businesses 4 79.36 4.2.3 Income inequality 15 88.40 2.2.1 Firms with website 2 98.01 4.2.4 Healthy life expectancy at birth 24 85.28 2.2.2 Ease of doing business 4 97.39 3rd sub-pillar: SDG Contribution 6 84.32 2.2.3 Professionals 3 67.43 4.3.1 SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being 22 86.89 2.2.4 Technicians and associate professionals 9 77.58 4.3.2 SDG 4: Quality Education 11 69.21 2.2.5 Business use of digital tools 15 85.44 4.3.3 SDG 5: Gender Equality 48 78.78 2.2.6 R&D expenditure by businesses 9 50.33 4.3.4 SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy 11 91.98 3rd sub-pillar: Governments 1 89.16 . 2.3.1 Government online services 3 96.97 . 2.3.2 Publication and use of open data 13 70.52 . 2.3.3 Government promotion of investment in emerging tech NA NA . 2.3.4 R&D expenditure by governments and higher education 1 100.00 . * Confidential data 5 Sources Berry, B. (2019). berryFunctions: Function Collection Related to Plotting and Hydrology. R package version 1.18.2. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=berryFunctions Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (eds.) (2019). The Network Readiness Index 2019: Towards a Future-Ready Society. Washington DC: Portulans Institute. Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (eds.) (2020). The Network Readiness Index 2020: Fostering Digital Transformation in a post- COVID Global Economy. Washington DC: Portulans Institute. Gohel, D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Social Progress Index Background and US Implementation
    Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org tweet about this event: @SPUR_Urbanist #SocialProgress The Social Progress Index Background and US Implementation www.socialprogress.org We need a new model “Economic growth alone is not sufficient to advance societies and improve the quality of life of citizens. True success, and Michael E. Porter Harvard Business growth that is inclusive, School and Social requires achieving Progress Imperative both economic and Advisory Board Chair social progress.” 2 Social Progress Index design principles As a complement to economic measures like GDP, SPI answers universally important questions about the success of society that measures of economic progress cannot alone address. 4 2019 Social Progress Index aggregates 50+ social and environmental outcome indicators from 149 countries 5 GDP is not destiny Across the spectrum, we see how some countries are much better at turning their economic growth into social progress than 2019 Social Progress Index Score Index Progress Social 2019 others. GDP PPP per capita (in USD) 6 6 From Index to Action to Impact Delivering local data and insight that is meaningful, relevant and actionable London Borough of Barking & Dagenham ward-level SPI holds US city-level SPIs empower government accountable to ensure mayors, business and civic leaders no one is left behind left behind with new insight to prioritize policies and investments European Union regional SPI provides a roadmap for policymakers to guide €350 billion+ in EU Cohesion Policy spending state and
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Development Index: Measuring the Quality of Life
    Student Resource XIV The Human Development Index: Measuring the Quality of Life The ‘Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary measure of average achievement in key dimensions of human development’ (UNDP). It is a measure closely related to quality of life, and is used to compare two or more countries. The United Nations developed the HDI based on three main dimensions: long and healthy life, knowledge, and a decent standard of living (see Image below). Figure 1: Indicators of HDI Source: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi In 2015, the United States ranked 8th among all countries in Human Development, ranking behind countries like Norway, Australia, Switzerland, Denmark, Netherlands, Germany and Ireland (UNDP, 2015). The closer a country is to 1.0 on the HDI index, the better its standing in regards to human development. Maps of HDI ranking reveal regional patterns, such as the low HDI in Sub-Saharan Africa (Figure 2). Figure 2. The United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) rankings for 2014 17 Use Student Resource XIII, Measuring Quality of Life Country Statistics to answer the following questions: 1. Categorize the countries into three groups based on their GNI PPP (US$), which relates to their income. List them here. High Income: Medium Income: Low Income: 2. Is there a relationship between income and any of the other statistics listed in the table, such as access to electricity, undernourishment, or access to physicians (or others)? Describe at least two patterns here. 3. There are several factors we can look at to measure a country's quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Well-Being and Progress: Looking Beyond
    Measuring well-being and progress Looking beyond GDP SUMMARY Gross domestic product (GDP), a measure of national economic production, has come to be used as a general measure of well-being and progress in society, and as a key indicator in deciding a wide range of public policies. However GDP does not properly take into account non-economic factors such as social issues and the environment. In the aftermath of the economic and financial crisis, the European Union (EU) needs reliable, transparent and convincing measures for evaluating progress. Indicators of social aspects that play a large role in determining citizens' well-being are increasingly being used to supplement economic measures. Health, education and social relationships play a large role in determining citizens' well-being. Subjective evaluations of well-being can also be used as a measure of progress. Moreover, changes in the environment caused by economic activities (in particular depletion of non-renewable resources and increased greenhouse gas emissions) need to be evaluated so as to ensure that today's development is sustainable for future generations. The EU and its Member States, as well as international bodies, have a role in ensuring that we have accurate, useful and credible ways of measuring well-being and assessing progress in our societies. In this briefing: Background Objective social indicators Subjective well-being Environment and sustainability EU and international context Further reading Author: Ron Davies, Members' Research Service European Parliamentary Research Service 140738REV1 http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu — http://epthinktank.eu [email protected] Measuring well-being and progress Background The limits of GDP Gross domestic product (GDP) measures the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country's borders in a given period, such as a year.1 It provides a simple and easily communicated monetary value that can be calculated from current market prices and that can be used to make comparisons between different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs
    2018 John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs Table of Contents World Happiness Report 2018 Editors: John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard, and Jeffrey D. Sachs Associate Editors: Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, Haifang Huang and Shun Wang 1 Happiness and Migration: An Overview . 3 John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs 2 International Migration and World Happiness . 13 John F. Helliwell, Haifang Huang, Shun Wang and Hugh Shiplett 3 Do International Migrants Increase Their Happiness and That of Their Families by Migrating? . 45 Martijn Hendriks, Martijn J. Burger, Julie Ray and Neli Esipova 4 Rural-Urban Migration and Happiness in China . 67 John Knight and Ramani Gunatilaka 5 Happiness and International Migration in Latin America . 89 Carol Graham and Milena Nikolova 6 Happiness in Latin America Has Social Foundations . 115 Mariano Rojas 7 America’s Health Crisis and the Easterlin Paradox . 146 Jeffrey D. Sachs Annex: Migrant Acceptance Index: Do Migrants Have Better Lives in Countries That Accept Them? . 160 Neli Esipova, Julie Ray, John Fleming and Anita Pugliese The World Happiness Report was written by a group of independent experts acting in their personal capacities. Any views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization, agency or programme of the United Nations. 2 Chapter 1 3 Happiness and Migration: An Overview John F. Helliwell, Vancouver School of Economics at the University of British Columbia, and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Richard Layard, Wellbeing Programme, Centre for Economic Performance, at the London School of Economics and Political Science Jeffrey D. Sachs, Director, SDSN, and Director, Center for Sustainable Development, Columbia University The authors are grateful to the Ernesto Illy Foundation and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research for research support, and to Gallup for data access and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • World Happiness REPORT Edited by John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs World Happiness Report Edited by John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs
    World Happiness REPORT Edited by John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs World Happiness reporT edited by John Helliwell, richard layard and Jeffrey sachs Table of ConTenTs 1. Introduction ParT I 2. The state of World Happiness 3. The Causes of Happiness and Misery 4. some Policy Implications references to Chapters 1-4 ParT II 5. Case study: bhutan 6. Case study: ons 7. Case study: oeCd 65409_Earth_Chapter1v2.indd 1 4/30/12 3:46 PM Part I. Chapter 1. InTrodUCTIon JEFFREY SACHS 2 Jeffrey D. Sachs: director, The earth Institute, Columbia University 65409_Earth_Chapter1v2.indd 2 4/30/12 3:46 PM World Happiness reporT We live in an age of stark contradictions. The world enjoys technologies of unimaginable sophistication; yet has at least one billion people without enough to eat each day. The world economy is propelled to soaring new heights of productivity through ongoing technological and organizational advance; yet is relentlessly destroying the natural environment in the process. Countries achieve great progress in economic development as conventionally measured; yet along the way succumb to new crises of obesity, smoking, diabetes, depression, and other ills of modern life. 1 These contradictions would not come as a shock to the greatest sages of humanity, including Aristotle and the Buddha. The sages taught humanity, time and again, that material gain alone will not fulfi ll our deepest needs. Material life must be harnessed to meet these human needs, most importantly to promote the end of suffering, social justice, and the attainment of happiness. The challenge is real for all parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Health in the EU Denmark DK Country Health Profile 2019 the Country Health Profile Series Contents
    State of Health in the EU Denmark DK Country Health Profile 2019 The Country Health Profile series Contents The State of Health in the EU’s Country Health Profiles 1. HIGHLIGHTS 3 provide a concise and policy-relevant overview of 2. HEALTH IN DENMARK 4 health and health systems in the EU/European Economic 3. RISK FACTORS 7 Area. They emphasise the particular characteristics and challenges in each country against a backdrop of cross- 4. THE HEALTH SYSTEM 9 country comparisons. The aim is to support policymakers 5. PERFORMANCE OF THE HEALTH SYSTEM 12 and influencers with a means for mutual learning and 5.1. Effectiveness 12 voluntary exchange. 5.2. Accessibility 16 The profiles are the joint work of the OECD and the 5.3. Resilience 18 European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 6. KEY FINDINGS 22 in cooperation with the European Commission. The team is grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions provided by the Health Systems and Policy Monitor network, the OECD Health Committee and the EU Expert Group on Health Information. Data and information sources The calculated EU averages are weighted averages of the 28 Member States unless otherwise noted. These EU The data and information in the Country Health Profiles averages do not include Iceland and Norway. are based mainly on national official statistics provided to Eurostat and the OECD, which were validated to This profile was completed in August 2019, based on ensure the highest standards of data comparability. data available in July 2019. The sources and methods underlying these data are To download the Excel spreadsheet matching all the available in the Eurostat Database and the OECD health tables and graphs in this profile, just type the following database.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Progress Index: Districts of India
    SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX: DISTRICTS OF INDIA MAKING SOCIAL PROGRESS MORE INTEGRAL TO THE INDIAN DEVELOPMENT AGENDA Institute for Competitiveness U 24/8 DLF Phase 3 Gurgaon, Haryana 122002 1 PARTNERS ABOUT INSTITUTE FOR COMPETITIVENESS, INDIA Institute for Competitiveness, India is the Indian knot in the global network of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness at Harvard Business School. Institute for Competitiveness, India is an international initiative centered in India, dedicated to enlarging and purposeful disseminating of the body of research and knowledge on competition and strategy, as pioneered over the last 25 years by Professor Michael Porter of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness at Harvard Business School. Institute for Competitiveness, India conducts & supports indigenous research; offers academic & executive courses; provides advisory services to the Corporate & the Governments. The institute studies competition and its implications for company strategy; the competitiveness of nations, regions & cities and thus generate guidelines for businesses and those in governance; and suggests & provides solutions for socio-economic problems. ABOUT SOCIAL PROGRESS IMPERATIVE The Social Progress Imperative’s mission is to improve the lives of people around the world, particularly the least well off, by advancing global social progress by: providing a robust, holistic and innovative measurement tool—the Social Progress Index; fostering research and knowledge-sharing on social progress; and equipping leaders and change-makers in business, government and civil society with new tools to guide policies and programs. From the EU to India to Brazil and beyond, the Social Progress Imperative has catalyzed the formation of local action networks that bring together government, businesses, academia, and civil society organizations committed to using the Social Progress Index as a tool to transform societies and improve people’s lives.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 EU Social Progress Index
    THE REGIONAL DIMENSION OF SOCIAL PROGRESS IN EUROPE: Presenting the new EU Social Progress Index Paola Annoni and Paolo Bolsi WORKING PAPER A series of short papers on regional research and indicators produced by the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy WP 06/2020 Regional and Urban Policy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors would like to thank colleagues in the Policy Development and Economic Analysis Unit of the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, and in particular Moray Gilland, Head of Unit, Lewis Dijkstra and the Geographic Information System team. They are also particularly grateful to John Walsh of the Evaluation and European Semester Unit, and the webmaster team for their assistance in the development of the web tools and integration on the Open Data Portal for European Structural and Investment Funds. Finally, special thanks to Manuela Scioni of the Department of Statistics of the University of Padua, for her insightful comments on the statistical methodology. LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy. The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not neces- sarily correspond to those of the European Commission. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © Cover image: iStock/Orbon Alija © European Union, 2020 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. THE REGIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist Intelligence Unit's Quality-Of-Life Index
    THE WORLD IN 2OO5 Quality-of-life index 1 The Economist Intelligence Unit’s quality-of-life index The Economist Intelligence Unit has developed a new Life-satisfaction surveys “quality of life” index based on a unique methodol- Our starting point for a methodologically improved ogy that links the results of subjective life-satisfaction and more comprehensive measure of quality of life is surveys to the objective determinants of quality of life subjective life-satisfaction surveys (surveys of life satis- across countries. The index has been calculated for 111 faction, as opposed to surveys of the related concept of countries for 2005. This note explains the methodology happiness, are preferred for a number of reasons). These and gives the complete country ranking. surveys ask people the simple question of how satisfi ed they are with their lives in general. A typical question Quality-of-life indices on the four-point scale used in the eu’s Eurobarometer It has long been accepted that material wellbeing, as studies is, “On the whole are you very satisfi ed, fairly measured by gdp per person, cannot alone explain the satisfi ed, not very satisfi ed, or not at all satisfi ed with broader quality of life in a country. One strand of the the life you lead?” literature has tried to adjust gdp by quantifying facets The results of the surveys have been attracting that are omitted by the gdp measure—various non- growing interest in recent years. Despite a range of early market activities and social ills such as environmental criticisms (cultural non-comparability and the effect of pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • DENMARK Country Case Study on the Integrated Delivery of Long-Term Care
    DENMARK Country case study on the integrated delivery of long-term care WHO Regional Office for Europe series on integrated delivery of long-term care DENMARK Country case study on the integrated delivery of long-term care WHO Regional Office for Europe series on integrated delivery of long-term care Abstract This report describes the current state of the delivery of long-term care services in Denmark. Overall, older people enjoy comprehensive high-quality health and long-term care. There is high coverage, low rates of preventable hospitalizations, short waiting times and high beneficiary satisfaction. There is high level of integration of care among providers, fostered also by an information platform. The provision of long-term care emphasizes enabling older people to remain living at home, independently, for as long as possible. Expenditure in health and long-term care is high which puts strain on the sustainability of the system. Keywords LONG-TERM CARE HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED CAREGIVERS INTEGRATED DELIVERY SYSTEMS WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICES DENMARK Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). © World Health Organization 2019 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Social Progress Index: Methodological Note
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL REGIONAL AND URBAN POLICY Economic Analysis Unit THE EU REGIONAL SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX: METHODOLOGICAL NOTE Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 2 2. WHAT IS THE SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX? .................................................................... 2 3. WHY AN EU REGIONAL SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX?..................................................... 3 4. HOW WAS THE EU REGIONAL SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX CONSTRUCTED? ................ 3 4.1. Geographical coverage ...................................................................................... 4 4.2. Internal statistical consistency of each component .......................................... 5 4.3. Normalization .................................................................................................... 5 4.4. Type of aggregation ........................................................................................... 6 5. REGIONS’ RELATIVE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES .................................................. 7 6. NEXT STEPS .................................................................................................................. 7 7. EU-SPI MAIN MAPS ...................................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX ........................................................................................................................... 11 1. INTRODUCTION This note summarises
    [Show full text]
  • Social Progress Index 2017
    SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX 2017 BY MICHAEL E. PORTER AND SCOTT STERN SOCIAL WITH MICHAEL GREEN PROGRESS IMPERATIVE SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX 2017 CONTENTS Executive Summary . 1 Chapter 1 / Why We Measure Social Progress . 10 Chapter 2 / How We Measure Social Progress . 14 Chapter 3 / 2017 Social Progress Index Results . 22 Chapter 4 / Global Trends in Social Progress, 2014–2017 . 39 Supplemental Section / From Index to Action to Impact . 55 Appendix A / Defi nitions and Data Sources . 68 Appendix B / 2017 Social Progress Index Full Results . 74 Appendix C / Social Progress Index vs. Log of GDP Per Capita . 79 Appendix D / Country Scorecard Summary . 80 Acknowledgments . 84 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2017 SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX Social progress has become an increasingly critical on average, personal security is no better in middle- agenda for leaders in government, business, and income countries than low-income ones, and is often civil society. Citizens’ demands for better lives are worse. Too many people — regardless of income — evident in uprisings such as the Arab Spring and the live without full rights and experience discrimination emergence of new political movements in even the or even violence based on gender, religion, ethnicity, most prosperous countries, such as the United States or sexual orientation. and France. Since the fi nancial crisis of 2008, citizens are increasingly expecting that business play its role Traditional measures of national income, such as in delivering improvements in the lives of customers GDP per capita, fail to capture the overall progress of and employees, and protecting the environment for societies. us all. This is the social progress imperative.
    [Show full text]