DOCSLIB.ORG

Old System; Reading List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Old System; Reading List Bibliography for Political Economy and Global Social Change v. 10/15/14 Procedures for qualifying examinations in the Political Economy of Global Social Change specialization of the Sociology department at UC Riverside. Students wishing to specialization in Political Economy and Global Social Change (PEGSC) must answer three questions to the satisfaction of the current examination of the committee. One question will be a general question, and will derive entirely from readings on this list. The remaining two questions will reflect the substantive research interests of the examinee. In consultation with the PEGSC committee, students will select 50 readings from the general reading list. In addition, they will develop two additional readings lists consisting of 50 readings each. Students may use readings from the general reading list on the specialized list, but cannot use them to satisfy the quota for the general list. Students will receive examinations on a Friday, and examinations will become due the following Monday. Classical Theory 1. Karl Marx: Capital, Volume 1, Part 1, Chapter 1, Section 4, “The fetishism of commodities and the secret thereof”; Chapter 26 “The secret of primitive accumulation; and Chapter 31, “Genesis of the industrial capitalist.” 2. Karl Marx Grundrisse, Introduction “The method of political economy.” 3. Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press. 4. Parsons, Talcott 1971 The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall 5. Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York, NY: Farrar & Reinhart, Inc. 6. Polanyi, Karl. “The economy as instituted process” Pp. 239‐270 in K. Polanyi, Conrad M. Arensberg and Harry W. Pearson (eds.) Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory. 7. Smith, Adam. 2003 [1776]. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Bantam Dell. pp 9‐32, 122‐197, 568‐593, 704‐14. Topics covered: division of labor, profit, colonies. 8. Giovanni Arrighi 2008. “The Historical Sociology of Adam Smith,” Chapter 2 in Adam Smith and Beijing. London: Verso 9. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society, Vol 1 and 2. Berkeley: UC Press. pp 33‐36, “Types of legitimate order: convention and law;” 54‐56, “Political and hierocratic organizations;” 82‐140, 150‐153, 201‐206, 302‐305, 375‐381, 926‐939. Topics covered: legitimacy, authority, wealth/capital/markets, classes, household‐to‐capitalist economies, stratification. 10. Max Weber General Economic History 11. Frederic Lane, “The economic meaning of war and protection,” Chapter 2 in Profits from Power: Readings in Protection Rent and Violence‐Controlling Enterprises. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1979. 12. C. Chase‐Dunn, “Geopolitics and capitalism: one logic or two?” Chapter 7 in Global Formation: Structures of the World‐Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998. Global stratification 1 13. Amin, Samir 1980 “The class structure of the contemporary imperialist system.” Monthly Review 31,8:9‐26. 14. Bergesen, Albert and Ronald Schoenberg. 1980. “Long waves of colonial expansion and contraction 1415‐1969” Pp. 231‐278 in Albert Bergesen (ed.) Studies of the Modern World‐ System. New York: Academic Press 15. Bornschier, Volker 2010 “On the evolution of inequality in the world system” Pp. 39‐64 in Christian Suter (ed.) Inequality Beyond Globalization: Economic Changes, Social Transformations and the Dynamics of Inequality. Zurich: LIT Verlag 16. Cardoso, F.H. and E. Faletto 1979 Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press. 17. Clark, Rob. 2011. “World Income Inequality in the Global Era: New Estimates, 1990–2008.” Social Problems 58: 565–592. 18. Firebaugh, Glenn 1999. Empirics of World Income Inequality." American Journal of Sociology 104: 1597‐1630 19. Firebaugh, Glenn. 2003. New Geographies of World Income Inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 20. Hung, Ho‐Fung and Jaime Kucinskas. 2011. “Globalization and Global Inequality: Assessing the Impact of the rise of China and India, 1980‐2005” American Journal of Sociology 116(5): 1478‐ 1513. 21. Kentor, Jeffrey. 2000. Kentor, Jeffrey. Capital and Coercion: The Role of Economic and Military Power in the World‐Economy 1800‐1990. New York: Routledge. 22. Mahutga, Matthew C. 2014. “Global Production Networks and International Inequality: Making a Case for a Meso‐Level Turn in Macro‐Comparative Sociology.” Forthcoming in the Journal of World‐Systems Research. 23. Milanovich, Branko 2005. Worlds Apart. Princeton: Princeton University Press 24. Korzieniwicz, Patricio and Timothy Moran. 1997. “World‐Economic Trends in the Distribution of Income, 1965‐1992.” American Journal of Sociology 102: 1000‐39 25. Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence: Europe, China and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Within‐Country Income Inequality 26. Akchurin, Maria and Cheol‐Sung Lee. 2013. “Pathways to Empowerment: Repertoires of Women’s Activism and Gender Earnings Equality.” American Sociological Review 679‐701. 27. Alderson, Arthur S and Francois Nielsen. 1999. “Inequality, Development and Dependence: A Reconsideration.” American Sociological Review 64(4):606‐31 28. _______2002 . “Globalization and the Great U‐Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 107(5):1244‐99 29. Beckfield, Jason. 2006. “European Integration and Income Inequality.” American Sociological Review 71: 964‐985. 30. Bandelj, Nina and Matthew C. Mahutga. 2010. “How Socio‐Economic Change Shapes Income Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe.” Social Forces 88(5): 2133‐2161. 31. Lee, Cheol‐Soul. 2005. “Income Inequality, Democracy, and Public Sector Size.” American Sociological Review 70: 158‐181 32. Lee, Cheol‐Sung, Young‐Bum Kim and Jae‐Mahn Shim. 2011. “The Limit of Equality Projects: Public‐Sector Expansion, Sectoral Conflicts, and Income Inequality in Postindustrial Economies.” American Sociological Review 76(1): 100‐24. 2 33. Lee, Cheol‐Sung, Francois Nielsen, and Arthur S. Alderson. 2007. “Income Inequality, Global Economy and the State.” Social Forces 86:77‐111. 34. Mahutga, Matthew C and Nina Bandelj. 2008. “Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality: The Natural Experiment of Central and Eastern Europe.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 29(6): 429‐454 35. Nielsen, Francois. 1994. "Income Inequality and Industrial Development: Dualism Revisited." American Sociological Review 59(5): 654‐77. 36. Rueda, David and Jonas Pontusson. 2000. “Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism.” World Politics 52(3): 350‐83. Globalization and economic organization 37. Alderson, Arthur S. 1999. “Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure or Success?” American Sociological Review. 38. Bair, Jennifer. 2005. “Global Capitalism and Commodity Chains: Looking Back, Going Forward.” Competition and Change 9(2): 153‐180. 39. Bair, Jennifer Lynn and Matthew C. Mahutga. 2012. “Varieties of Offshoring? Spatial Fragmentation and the Organization of Production in 21st Century Capitalism.” Pp. 270‐297 in Richard Whitely and Glen Morgan (Eds) Capitalisms and Capitalism in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 40. Boyer, Robert, 1996: “The Convergence Hypothesis Revisited: Globalization but Still the Century of Nations?” Pp 29‐59 in Suzanne Berger and Ronald Dore (eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 41. Gereffi, Gary 1996. “Global Commodity Chains: New Forms of Coordination and Control Among Nations and Firms in International Industries.” Competition and Change 1(1): 427‐439. 42. Gereffi, Gary and Korzeniewicz 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. London: Praeger 43. Herrigel, Gary, and Volker Wittke, 2005: “Varieties of Vertical Disintegration: The Global Trend toward Heterogeneous Supply Relations and the Reproduction of Difference in US and German Manufacturing” Pp 277‐311 in Glenn Morgan, Richard Whitley, and Eli Moen (eds.), Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press 44. Hopkins, Terrance and Immanuel Wallerstein. 1986. “Commodity Chains in the World Economy Prior to 1800.” Review 10(1): 157‐70. 45. Kenworthy, Lane. 1997. “Globalization and Economic Convergence.” Competition and Change 2: 1‐64 46. Kollmeyer, Christopher. 2009. “Explaining Deindustrialization: How Affluence, Productivity Growth and Globalization Diminish Manufacturing Employment.” American Journal of Sociology 114(6): 1644‐74 47. Mahutga, Matthew C. 2012 “When Do Value Chains Go Global? A Theory of the Spatialization of Global Value Chains.” Global Networks 12: 1‐21 48. Mahutga, Matthew C. 2014. “Production Networks and the Organization of the Global Manufacturing Economy.” Sociological Perspectives 57(2): 229‐55. 49. Whitley, Richard. 1996. “Business Systems and Global Commodity Chains: Competing or Compliementary Forms of Economic Organization? Competition and Change 1: 411‐25. Globalization, the nation‐state and global governance 50. Abernethy, David B. 2000. The Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires, 1415–1980. 3 New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 51. Abu‐Lughod, Janet 1991 Before European Hegemony: The World‐System A.D. 1250‐1350. New York:Oxford University Press. 52. Arrighi, Giovanni and Beverly Silver. 1999. Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 53. Beck, Ulrich. 2005. Power in the Global Age. Malden,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deleuze and Guattari As Dependency Theorists Samuel Weeks Thomas Jefferson University, [email protected]
    Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons College of Humanities and Sciences Faculty Papers Jefferson College of Humanities and Sciences 2-1-2019 A Politics of Peripheries: Deleuze and Guattari as Dependency Theorists Samuel Weeks Thomas Jefferson University, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Follow this and additional works at: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/jchsfp Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Weeks, Samuel. "A Politics of Peripheries: Deleuze and Guattari as Dependency Theorists.” Deleuze and Guattari Studies, Volume 13, Issue 1, February 2019, Pages 79-103. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The effeJ rson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The ommonC s is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The effeJ rson Digital Commons allows researchers and interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in College of Humanities and Sciences Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of the Jefferson Digital Commons. For more information, please contact: [email protected]. Deleuze and Guattari Studies ‘A Politics of Peripheries: Deleuze and Guattari as Dependency Theorists’ Samuel Weeks, M.A., Ph.D. College of Humanities and Sciences Thomas Jefferson University [email protected] This file is the pre-publication version. Here is the citation of the published article: Weeks, Samuel (2019) ‘A Politics of Peripheries: Deleuze and Guattari as Dependency Theorists’, Deleuze and Guattari Studies 13.1, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to Giovanni Arrighi
    JOURNAL FÜR ENTWICKLUNGSPOLITIK herausgegeben vom Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik an den österreichischen Universitäten vol. XXVII 1–2011 GIOVANNI ARRIGHI: A Global Perspective Schwerpunktredaktion: Amy Austin-Holmes, Stefan Schmalz Inhaltsverzeichnis 4 Amy Austin-Holmes, Stefan Schmalz From Africa to Asia: The Intellectual Trajectory of Giovanni Arrighi 14 Samir Amin A Tribute to Giovanni Arrighi 25 Fortunata Piselli Reflections on Calabria: A Critique of the Concept of ‘Primitive Accumulation’ 44 Çaglar Keyder, Zafer Yenal Agrarian Transformation, Labour Supplies, and Proletarianization Processes in Turkey: A Historical Overview 72 Thomas Ehrlich Reifer Global Inequalities, Alternative Regionalisms and the Future of Socialism 95 Walden Bello China and the Global Economy: The Persistence of Export-Led Growth 113 Rezension 116 Editors of the Special Issue and Authors 119 Impressum Journal für Entwicklungspolitik XXVII 1-2011, S. 14-24 SAMIR AMIN A Tribute to Giovanni Arrighi 1. Giovanni Arrighi: a preeminent analyst of contemporary globalization Born in Italy, died on June 18, 2009 at the age of 71, Giovanni Arrighi was one of the most eminent critical analysts of the contemporary world system. Faced with arrest due to his support of the liberation movement in colonial Rhodesia, Giovanni went on to deepen his analysis of Africa’s dependency during his stay in Tanzania. He continued his work on the contemporary world system at the Fernand Braudel Center of SUNY-Bing- hamton in the United States, which was directed at that time by Immanuel Wallerstein, and then later at John Hopkins University in Baltimore. At the end of 1970, Giovanni Arrighi – along with André Gunder Frank, Immanuel Wallerstein and myself – believed that capitalism had entered a phase of systemic crisis, marked by the fall in growth rates in its dominant cores (with, as a result, the system never again returning to its former rates).
    [Show full text]
  • The Winding Paths of Capital
    giovanni arrighi THE WINDING PATHS OF CAPITAL Interview by David Harvey Could you tell us about your family background and your education? was born in Milan in 1937. On my mother’s side, my fam- ily background was bourgeois. My grandfather, the son of Swiss immigrants to Italy, had risen from the ranks of the labour aristocracy to establish his own factories in the early twentieth Icentury, manufacturing textile machinery and later, heating and air- conditioning equipment. My father was the son of a railway worker, born in Tuscany. He came to Milan and got a job in my maternal grand- father’s factory—in other words, he ended up marrying the boss’s daughter. There were tensions, which eventually resulted in my father setting up his own business, in competition with his father-in-law. Both shared anti-fascist sentiments, however, and that greatly influenced my early childhood, dominated as it was by the war: the Nazi occupation of Northern Italy after Rome’s surrender in 1943, the Resistance and the arrival of the Allied troops. My father died suddenly in a car accident, when I was 18. I decided to keep his company going, against my grandfather’s advice, and entered the Università Bocconi to study economics, hoping it would help me understand how to run the firm. The Economics Department was a neo- classical stronghold, untouched by Keynesianism of any kind, and no help at all with my father’s business. I finally realized I would have to close it down. I then spent two years on the shop-floor of one of my new left review 56 mar apr 2009 61 62 nlr 56 grandfather’s firms, collecting data on the organization of the production process.
    [Show full text]
  • Neil Smith, 1954-2012: Radical Geography, Marxist Geographer, Revolutionary Geographer
    1 Neil Smith, 1954-2012: Radical Geography, Marxist Geographer, Revolutionary Geographer Don Mitchell Department of Geography, Syracuse University and Advanced Research Collaborative, Graduate Center City University of New York September 29, 2013 "Although we found it easy to be brilliant, we always found it confusing to be good." Salman Rushdie, Midnight's Children (quotation found pinned to the bulletin board in Neil Smith’s study when passed away) Neil Smith hated hagiography. He would rail against it in his history and theory of geography seminars at Rutgers University in the early 1990s, holding up what he thought were particularly egregious examples: obituaries published in the Annals. Hagiography for Neil was the antithesis of what our disciplinary history ought to be: it was uncritical and celebratory, when what were needed were hard-nosed engagements with ideas, with real histories that understood ideas as the product of struggle and error as well as genius and insight. Even worse, hagiography extracted its subject from history, setting him (usually him) apart from the world as a lone genius rather than fully ensconcing him in messy social (and personal) practices, situating ideas within the social (and personal) histories from which they emerged. Hagiography had little room to show how what was genius in someone’s ideas might be inextricably linked to, indeed very much a function of both social context and what was flawed or less savory in that person. Hagiography denies that ideas are embodied. Neil’s ideas were embodied. 2 Indeed, David Harvey calls Neil “the perfect practicing Marxist – completely defined by his contradictions.”1 Born in Leith, the old port of Edinburgh, and raised one of four children of a school teaching father and homemaking mother in Dalkeith, a small working-class town to the southeast of the city, Neil had an indestructible passion for the natural world, starting with his native Midlothian landscape and quickly spiraling out, for birdwatching, and for gardening, and he became geography’s preeminent urban theorist.
    [Show full text]
  • Can China Lead the Change of the World?
    Third World Quarterly ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ctwq20 Can China lead the change of the world? Annamária Artner To cite this article: Annamária Artner (2020) Can China lead the change of the world?, Third World Quarterly, 41:11, 1881-1899, DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2020.1793664 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1793664 Published online: 04 Aug 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 579 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ctwq20 THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY 2020, VOL. 41, NO. 11, 1881–1899 https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1793664 Can China lead the change of the world? Annamária Artner Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Budapest, Hungary ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Currently, the world system is in a state of complex crisis and transfor- Received 7 May 2019 mation. The overall influence of its US-led centre has weakened, and Accepted 6 July 2020 most of the global periphery is in either chaos or misery. The mecha- KEYWORDS nisms of the global accumulation of capital prevent new global leaders catching up from emerging. Until now, China’s economic ascent has been based on China managed market forces and sovereign monetary policy. However, if the delinking liberalisation of capital flows in China continues, the country’s financial hegemony independence might be lost. This article explains how the nodal crisis nodal crisis of global capitalism has evolved, how far the marketisation and financial world system liberalisation of the Chinese economy has gone and the largest obsta- cles to China further strengthening its influence on the world order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Driftages of Modernity: the Case of Africa and the Arab World Titulo
    The Driftages of Modernity: the Case of Africa and the Arab World Titulo Amin, Samir - Autor/a; Autor(es) Politics and Social Movements in an Hegemonic World: Lessons from Africa, Asia and En: Latin America Buenos Aires Lugar CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales Editorial/Editor 2005 Fecha Sur-Sur Colección crisis; ideologias politicas; modernidad; identidad cultural; desigualdad social; Temas etnicidad; relaciones interetnicas; Arabia Saudita; Qatar; Bahrein; Kuwait; Siria; Jordania; Israel; Libano; Mundo Arabe; Etiopia; Africa; Yemen; Oman; Emiratos Arabes Unidos; Capítulo de Libro Tipo de documento http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/clacso/sur-sur/20100711015618/4_Amin.pdf URL Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 2.0 Genérica Licencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.es Segui buscando en la Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de CLACSO http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO) Conselho Latino-americano de Ciências Sociais (CLACSO) Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO) www.clacso.edu.ar Samir Amin* The Driftages of Modernity: the Case of Africa and the Arab World The driftages of modernity 1. The contemporary world is simultaneously one, diverse and unequal. It is one, whether we like it or not, because of the “force of facts”, that is to say, because of that power that characterizes capitalism –“the market”, to name it with the common, approximate and ambiguous term with which the dominant discourse describes the world system– namely that of integrating, even if under unequal terms, all the peoples of all regions of the world, within a system ruled by the same dominant logic.
    [Show full text]
  • On Samir Amin's Strategy of "Delinking" and "Socialist Transition"
    On Samir Amin's Strategy of "Delinking" and "Socialist Transition" Yong-hong Zhang1 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Available Online November 2013 This paper aims to analyze Samir Amin's contribution to the strategy of Key words: "delinking" and "socialist transition". He analyzes the global capitalist system Samir Amin; and argues that its process of capital accumulation is exploitative and Capitalism; destructive of the Third World countries, namely, the periphery. The global Globalization; capitalist model has created underdevelopment and marginalization in the Delinking; periphery. Accordingly, the Third World countries need to "delink" from the socialist transition. capitalism-led globalization and the world capitalist system, and make a socialist transition, which, in essence, is a new development model characterized by liberation and a full and effective participation of the Third World countries in the global system. Amin's strategy provides a model for change and development of many underdeveloped countries. 1. Introduction Samir Amin, the Third World Forum President, is well-known for his "dependency theory" and the study of capitalism and the Third World development issues. He discusses the problems of underdevelopment in the Third World macroscopically and criticizes the traditional bourgeois economics and development theory, emphasizing that the Third World underdevelopment results mainly from the control and exploitation by the United States and other Western powers. Dependency theory is the notion that resources flow from a "periphery" of poor and underdeveloped states to a "core" of wealthy states, enriching the latter at the expense of the former. It is a central contention of dependency theory that poor states are impoverished and rich ones enriched by the way poor states are integrated into the "wor ld system".
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of World-Systems Research Forum on Samir
    JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH ISSN: 1076-156X | Vol. 25 Issue 2 | DOI 10.5195/JWSR.2019.956 | jwsr.pitt.edu FORUM ON SAMIR AMIN’S PROPOSAL FOR A NEW INTERNATIONAL OF WORKERS AND PEOPLES Samir Amin, a leading scholar and co-founder of the world-systems tradition, died on August 12, 2018. Just before his death, he published, along with close allies, a call for ‘workers and the people’ to establish a ‘fifth international’ to coordinate support to progressive movements. To honor Samir Amin’s invaluable contribution to world-systems scholarship, we are pleased to present our readers with a selection of essays responding to Amin’s final message for today’s anti-systemic movements. This forum is being co-published between Globalizations, the Journal of World-Systems Research, and Pambazuka News. Readers can find additional essays and commentary in these outlets. The following essay has been published in Globalizations and is being reproduced here with permission. World Revolution or Socialism, Community by Community, in the Anthropocene? Lesley Sklair London School of Economics [email protected] The idea of a Fifth International has been around for some time and the historical record is not encouraging. For the past few years I have been wrestling with an apparent contradiction in the work of all of us on the Left. On the one hand, our research demonstrates how powerful and successful consumerist capitalism and its integral system of ‘nation-states’ has been, never more so than in its current neoliberal/social democratic forms (by which I mean ‘New Labour’ in the UK and elsewhere).
    [Show full text]
  • SAMIR AMIN the American Ideology an Unmitigated Economic Liberalism
    SAMIR AMIN The American ideology An unmitigated economic liberalism, masked by a parareligious discourse and packaged with insipid rhetoric about democracy I Today, the United States is governed by a junta of war criminals who took power through a kind of coup. That coup may have been preceded by (dubious) elections: but we should never forget that Hitler was also an elected politician. In this analogy, 9/11 fulfils the function of the “burning of the Reichstag”, allowing the junta to grant its police force powers similar to those of the Gestapo. They have their own Mein Kampf - the National Security Strategy -, their own mass associations - the patriot organisations - and their own preachers. It is vital that we have the courage to tell these truths, and stop masking them behind phrases such as “our American friends” that have by now become quite meaningless. Political culture is the long-term product of history. As such, it is obviously specific to each country. American political culture is clearly different from that which has emerged from the history of the European continent: it has been shaped by the establishment of New England by extremist protestant sects, the genocide of the continent’s indigenous peoples, the enslavement of Africans, and the emergence of communities segregated by ethnicity as a result of successive waves of migration throughout the 19th century. II Modernity, secularism and democracy are not the result of an evolution in religious beliefs, or even a revolution; on the contrary, it is faith which has had to adjust to meet the requirements of these new forces.
    [Show full text]
  • L'héritage Caché De Samir Amin : Les Fondements Écologiques De La Déconnexion
    L'héritage caché de Samir Amin : les fondements écologiques de la déconnexion Review of African Political Economy Ajl, Max https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2020.1837095 This article is made publicly available in the institutional repository of Wageningen University and Research, under the terms of article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, also known as the Amendment Taverne. This has been done with explicit consent by the author. Article 25fa states that the author of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds is entitled to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work. This publication is distributed under The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) 'Article 25fa implementation' project. In this project research outputs of researchers employed by Dutch Universities that comply with the legal requirements of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act are distributed online and free of cost or other barriers in institutional repositories. Research outputs are distributed six months after their first online publication in the original published version and with proper attribution to the source of the original publication. You are permitted to download and use the publication for personal purposes. All rights remain with the author(s) and / or copyright owner(s) of this work. Any use of the publication or parts of it other than authorised under article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright act is prohibited. Wageningen University & Research and the author(s) of this publication shall not be held responsible or liable for any damages resulting from your (re)use of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eleven Theories of the Capitalist World-System Rémy Herrera
    Chapter Eleven Theories of the Capitalist World-System Rémy Herrera The national structures of capitalism operate and are reproduced locally in the rst instance, through a combination of a domestic market, where com- modities, capital and labour are mobile, and a corre- sponding set of state apparatuses. By contrast, what de nes the capitalist world-system is the dichotomy between the existence of a world market, integrated in all aspects except for labour (which is forced into an international quasi-immobility), and the absence of a single political order at a global level that is more than a multiplicity of state bodies governed by public international law and/or the violence of the balance of forces. It is the causes, mechanisms, and consequences of this asymmetry at work in the accu- mulation of capital, in terms of unequal relations of domination between nations and of exploitation between classes in particular, that the theoreticians of this capitalist world-system endeavour to con- ceptualise. The latter have in fact produced a com- prehensive theory whose object and concept is the modern world as a concrete socio-historical entity forming a system – that is to say, an assemblage (Greek systema), structured by complex relations of interdependence, of several elements of reality into a coherent, autonomous totality that situates them and gives them meaning. BIDET2_f12_208-224.indd 209 10/29/2007 4:45:22 PM 210 • Rémy Herrera Among the representatives of this intellectual current, I shall (to restrict myself to the essentials) select four major authors: Samir Amin, Immanuel Wallerstein, Giovanni Arrighi and André Gunder Frank.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of World-Systems Research Forum on Samir Amin's Proposal for a New International of Workers and Peoples
    JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH ISSN: 1076-156X | Vol. 25 Issue 2 | DOI 10.5195/JWSR.2019.955 | jwsr.pitt.edu FORUM ON SAMIR AMIN’S PROPOSAL FOR A NEW INTERNATIONAL OF WORKERS AND PEOPLES Samir Amin, a leading scholar and co-founder of the world-systems tradition, died on August 12, 2018. Just before his death, he published, along with close allies, a call for ‘workers and the people’ to establish a ‘fifth international’ to coordinate support to progressive movements. To honor Samir Amin’s invaluable contribution to world-systems scholarship, we are pleased to present our readers with a selection of essays responding to Amin’s final message for today’s anti-systemic movements. This forum is being co-published between Globalizations, the Journal of World-Systems Research, and Pambazuka News. Readers can find additional essays and commentary in these outlets. The following essay has been published in Globalizations and is being reproduced here with permission. In a July 3, 2018 letter to his comrades, workers, activists and friends,1 Samir Amin and his allies outlined the rationale for his [last] request to establish a new International of Workers and Peoples. The Journal of World-Systems Research is pleased to reprint this letter for our readers, along with Amin’s Call for a New International of Workers and Peoples. Dear comrades, Dear activists, Dear workers, 1 Originally published at: http://www.networkideas.org/featured-articles/2018/07/it-is-imperative-to-reconstruct-the- internationale-of-workers-and-peoples/. Reposted August 28, 2018 at: https://www.pambazuka.org/global- south/letter-intent-inaugural-meeting-international-workers-and-peoples.
    [Show full text]