DOCSLIB.ORG

Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019 MINERAL COMMODITY SUMMARIES 2019 Abrasives Fluorspar Mercury Silicon Aluminum Gallium Mica Silver Antimony Garnet Molybdenum Soda Ash Arsenic Gemstones Nickel Stone Asbestos Germanium Niobium Strontium Barite Gold Nitrogen Sulfur Bauxite Graphite Palladium Talc Beryllium Gypsum Peat Tantalum Bismuth Hafnium Perlite Tellurium Boron Helium Phosphate Rock Thallium Bromine Indium Platinum Thorium Cadmium Iodine Potash Tin Cement Iron and Steel Pumice Titanium Cesium Iron Ore Quartz Crystal Tungsten Chromium Iron Oxide Pigments Rare Earths Vanadium Clays Kyanite Rhenium Vermiculite Cobalt Lead Rubidium Wollastonite Copper Lime Salt Yttrium Diamond Lithium Sand and Gravel Zeolites Diatomite Magnesium Scandium Zinc Feldspar Manganese Selenium Zirconium Cover: A solar evaporation pond at Albemarle Corp.’s lithium production site in Silver Peak, Nevada. Lithium compounds are used to manufacture many products. Lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide are needed for lithium-ion-batteries in mobile devices such as smartphones, tablet computers, and laptops, or in electric or hybrid vehicles. Butyllithium is needed for the production of synthetic rubber for tires. Lithium organics are versatile tools for the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, or flavors and fragrances. The glass industry requires lithium carbonate or spodumene to improve the properties of glass. Lithium bromide is used in industrial absorption refrigeration systems that are installed in large buildings and industrial plants for air-conditioning or process cooling. (Photograph courtesy of Albemarle Corp., copyright 2016 Albemarle Corp.) U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey MINERAL COMMODITY SUMMARIES 2019 Abrasives Fluorspar Mercury Silicon Aluminum Gallium Mica Silver Antimony Garnet Molybdenum Soda Ash Arsenic Gemstones Nickel Stone Asbestos Germanium Niobium Strontium Barite Gold Nitrogen Sulfur Bauxite Graphite Palladium Talc Beryllium Gypsum Peat Tantalum Bismuth Hafnium Perlite Tellurium Boron Helium Phosphate Rock Thallium Bromine Indium Platinum Thorium Cadmium Iodine Potash Tin Cement Iron and Steel Pumice Titanium Cesium Iron Ore Quartz Crystal Tungsten Chromium Iron Oxide Pigments Rare Earths Vanadium Clays Kyanite Rhenium Vermiculite Cobalt Lead Rubidium Wollastonite Copper Lime Salt Yttrium Diamond Lithium Sand and Gravel Zeolites Diatomite Magnesium Scandium Zinc Feldspar Manganese Selenium Zirconium U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 Manuscript approved for publication February 28, 2019. For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment— visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Mail: Stop IDCC; Washington, DC 20402–0001 Phone: (866) 512–1800 (toll-free); (202) 512–1800 (Washington, DC area) Fax: (202) 512–2104 Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: U.S. Geological Survey, 2019, Mineral commodity summaries 2019: U.S. Geological Survey, 200 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/70202434. ISBN 978-1-4113-4283-5 1 CONTENTS Page Page General: Introduction .................................................................... 3 Significant Events, Trends, and Issues .......................... 7 Growth Rates of Leading and Coincident Indexes for Appendix A—Abbreviations and Units of Measure .... 194 Mineral Products ......................................................... 4 Appendix B—Definitions of Selected Terms Used in The Role of Nonfuel Minerals in the U.S. Economy ...... 5 This Report .............................................................. 194 2018 U.S. Net Import Reliance for Selected Nonfuel Appendix C—Reserves and Resources ..................... 195 Mineral Materials ........................................................ 6 Appendix D—Country Specialists Directory ............... 199 Mineral Commodities: Abrasives (Manufactured) ............................................ 18 Mercury ....................................................................... 106 Aluminum ..................................................................... 20 Mica (Natural) ............................................................. 108 Antimony ...................................................................... 22 Molybdenum ............................................................... 110 Arsenic ......................................................................... 24 Nickel .......................................................................... 112 Asbestos ...................................................................... 26 Niobium (Columbium) ................................................. 114 Barite ............................................................................ 28 Nitrogen (Fixed)—Ammonia ....................................... 116 Bauxite and Alumina .................................................... 30 Peat ............................................................................ 118 Beryllium ...................................................................... 32 Perlite ......................................................................... 120 Bismuth ........................................................................ 34 Phosphate Rock ......................................................... 122 Boron ............................................................................ 36 Platinum-Group Metals ............................................... 124 Bromine ........................................................................ 38 Potash ........................................................................ 126 Cadmium ...................................................................... 40 Pumice and Pumicite .................................................. 128 Cement......................................................................... 42 Quartz Crystal (Industrial) .......................................... 130 Cesium ......................................................................... 44 Rare Earths ................................................................ 132 Chromium..................................................................... 46 Rhenium ..................................................................... 134 Clays ............................................................................ 48 Rubidium .................................................................... 136 Cobalt ........................................................................... 50 Salt ............................................................................. 138 Copper ......................................................................... 52 Sand and Gravel (Construction) ................................. 140 Diamond (Industrial) ..................................................... 54 Sand and Gravel (Industrial) ...................................... 142 Diatomite ...................................................................... 56 Scandium .................................................................... 144 Feldspar and Nepheline Syenite .................................. 58 Selenium ..................................................................... 146 Fluorspar ...................................................................... 60 Silicon ......................................................................... 148 Gallium ......................................................................... 62 Silver ........................................................................... 150 Garnet (Industrial) ........................................................ 64 Soda Ash .................................................................... 152 Gemstones ................................................................... 66 Stone (Crushed) ......................................................... 154 Germanium .................................................................. 68 Stone (Dimension) ...................................................... 156 Gold .............................................................................. 70 Strontium .................................................................... 158 Graphite (Natural) ........................................................ 72 Sulfur .......................................................................... 160 Gypsum ........................................................................ 74 Talc and Pyrophyllite .................................................. 162 Helium .......................................................................... 76 Tantalum ..................................................................... 164 Indium .......................................................................... 78 Tellurium ..................................................................... 166 Iodine ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
    MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anjahamiary Pegmatite, Fort Dauphin Area, Madagascar
    The Anjahamiary pegmatite, Fort Dauphin area, Madagascar Federico Pezzotta* & Marc Jobin** * Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Corso Venezia 55, I-20121 Milano, Italy. ** SOMEMA, BP 6018, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar. E-mail:<[email protected]> 21 February, 2003 INTRODUCTION Madagascar is among the most important areas in the world for the production, mainly in the past, of tourmaline (elbaite and liddicoatite) gemstones and mineral specimens. A large literature database documents the presence of a number of pegmatites rich in elbaite and liddicoatite. The pegmatites are mainly concentrated in central Madagascar, in a region including, from north to south, the areas of Tsiroanomandidy, Itasy, Antsirabe-Betafo, Ambositra, Ambatofinandrahana, Mandosonoro, Ikalamavony, Fenoarivo and Fianarantsoa (e.g. Pezzotta, 2001). In general, outside this large area, elbaite-liddicoatite-bearing pegmatites are rare and only minor discoveries have been made in the past. Nevertheless, some recent work made by the Malagasy company SOMEMEA, discovered a great potential for elbaite-liddicoatite gemstones and mineral specimens in a large, unusual pegmatite (the Anjahamiary pegmatite), hosted in high- metamorphic terrains. The Anjahamiary pegmatite lies in the Fort Dauphin (Tôlanaro) area, close to the southern coast of Madagascar. This paper reports a general description of this locality, and some preliminary results of the analytical studies of the accessory minerals collected at the mine. Among the most important analytical results is the presence of gemmy blue liddicoatite crystals with a very high Ca content, indicating the presence in this tourmaline crystal of composition near the liddicoatite end-member. LOCATION AND ACCESS The Anjahamiary pegmatite is located about 70 km NW of the town of Fort Dauphin (Tôlanaro) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Studies on As and Sb Sulfide Molecules
    Mineral Spectroscopy: A Tribute to Roger G. Bums © The Geochemical Society, Special Publication No.5, 1996 Editors: M. D. Dyar, C. McCammon and M. W. Schaefer Theoretical studies on As and Sb sulfide molecules J. A. TOSSELL Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A. Abstract-Dimorphite (As4S3) and realgar and pararealgar (As4S4) occur as crystalline solids con- taining As4S3 and As4S4 molecules, respectively. Crystalline As2S3 (orpiment) has a layered structure composed of rings of AsS3 triangles, rather than one composed of discrete As4S6 molecules. When orpiment dissolves in concentrated sulfidic solutions the species produced, as characterized by IR and EXAFS, are mononuclear, e.g. ASS3H21, but solubility studies suggest trimeric species in some concentration regimes. Of the antimony sulfides only Sb2S3 (stibnite) has been characterized and its crystal structure does not contain Sb4S6 molecular units. We have used molecular quantum mechanical techniques to calculate the structures, stabilities, vibrational spectra and other properties of As S , 4 3 As4S4, As4S6, As4SIO, Sb4S3, Sb4S4, Sb4S6 and Sb4SlO (as well as S8 and P4S3, for comparison with previous calculations). The calculated structures and vibrational spectra are in good agreement with experiment (after scaling the vibrational frequencies by the standard correction factor of 0.893 for polarized split valence Hartree-Fock self-consistent-field calculations). The calculated geometry of the As4S. isomer recently characterized in pararealgar crystals also agrees well with experiment and is calculated to be about 2.9 kcal/mole less stable than the As4S4 isomer found in realgar. The calculated heats of formation of the arsenic sulfide gas-phase molecules, compared to the elemental cluster molecules As., Sb, and S8, are smaller than the experimental heats of formation for the solid arsenic sulfides, but shown the same trend with oxidation state.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • The New IMA List of Gem Materials – a Work in Progress – Updated: July 2018
    The New IMA List of Gem Materials – A Work in Progress – Updated: July 2018 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of gem materials is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on Gem Materials of the International Mineralogical Association. The list will be updated on a regular basis. Mineral names and formulae are from the IMA List of Minerals: http://nrmima.nrm.se//IMA_Master_List_%282016-07%29.pdf. Where there is a discrepancy the IMA List of Minerals will take precedence. Explanation of column headings: IMA status: A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). Gem material name: minerals are normal text; non-minerals are bold; rocks are all caps; organics and glasses are italicized. Caveat (IMPORTANT): inevitably there will be mistakes in a list of this type. We will be grateful to all those who will point out errors of any kind, including typos. Please email your corrections to [email protected]. Acknowledgments: The following persons, listed in alphabetic order, gave their contribution to the building and the update of the IMA List of Minerals: Vladimir Bermanec, Emmanuel Fritsch, Lee A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stability of Lead Isotopes from Thorium
    MAY 24, I9I7] NATURE ---------------------------------------------------------245 but I Prof. Stefan lYle:yer may be I .have pointed out the unsuitability of makmg some exammatwn of the radiations of the thonum mmerals for age determination or correlation material, and the results he obtains will therefore be and this is particularly so i.n the case of minerals of very great value in deciding this point. the Palreozoic igneous rocks of Langesundfjord, Nor­ FREDERICK SoDDY. way. Mr. Lawson and myself based our former con­ Aberdeen, May 14. that lead could not be the end product of thonum largely on analyses of these minerals. How­ . PRO.F. SoDDY. having given me the privilege of read­ e:ver, I have recalculated the ratiQs on the assump­ mg h1s letter m advance, I should like to take the twn that thonum has one-seventh the lead-producing opportunity of directing attention to the geological age power of uranium, and it is satisfactory to find that :>f the thorium minerals of Ceylon, and to a few further when thorium is less than five times a·s abundant statistics bearing on the suggestion that only 35 per uranium, the ratios agree as closely on th'ts calculation cent. of thorium produces a stable isotope of lead. as do the simple lead-ratios. When thorium is more than five times as abundant as uranium neither set I a!ll to my friend, Mr. E. J. Wayland, late of ratios gives any approach to agreement although of Ceylon, for the follow­ mg prov1s1onal classdicat10n (in order of age) of the the minerals from anv one locality agree am'ong them­ older rocks of the island :- selves.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Minerals of the San Luis Valley and adjacent areas of Colorado Charles F. Bauer, 1971, pp. 231-234 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Size and Processing Method on the Cytotoxicity of Realgar Nanoparticles in Cancer Cell Lines
    International Journal of Nanomedicine Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Effect of size and processing method on the cytotoxicity of realgar nanoparticles in cancer cell lines Weizhong Zhao1 Abstract: In this study, the effects of the size and Chinese traditional processing (including Xun Lu3 elutriation, water cleaning, acid cleaning, alkali cleaning) on realgar nanoparticles (RN)-induced Yuan Yuan1 antitumor activity in human osteosarcoma cell lines (MG-63) and hepatoma carcinoma cell lines Changsheng Liu1 (HepG-2) were investigated. The human normal liver cell line (L-02) was used as control. RN Baican Yang3 was prepared by high-energy ball milling technology. The results showed that with the assistance Hua Hong1 of sodium dodecyl sulfate, the size of realgar could be reduced to 127 nm after 12 hours’ ball milling. The surface charge was decreased from 0.83 eV to -17.85 eV and the content of As O Guoying Wang3 2 3 clearly increased. Except for elutriation, the processing methods did not clearly change the size Fanyan Zeng2 of the RN, but the content of As2O3 was reduced dramatically. In vitro MTT tests indicated that 1The State Key Laboratory in the two cancer cell lines, RN cytotoxicity was more intense than that of the coarse realgar of Bioreactor Engineering, 2Key Laboratory for Ultrafine nanoparticles, and cytotoxicity was typically time- and concentration-dependent. Also, RN Materials of Ministry of Education cytotoxicities in the HepG-2 and L-02 cells all increased with increasing milling time. Due to and Engineering Research Center the reduction of the As O content, water cleaning, acid cleaning, and alkali cleaning decreased for Biomedical Materials of Ministry 2 3 of Education, East China University RN cytotoxicity in HepG-2, but RN after elutriation, with the lowest As2O3 (3.5 mg/g) and the of Science and Technology, 3Pharmacy smallest size (109.3 nm), showed comparable cytotoxicity in HepG-2 to RN without treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals - Properties and Identification Lab
    MINERALS - PROPERTIES AND IDENTIFICATION LAB INTRODUCTION TO THE MINERALS - is a description of 30 important minerals for GLG 103. Each mineral species has its properties described, as well as a link to other images of that mineral. A geologic description of the particular image is also included. This group of pictures is intended to give you an overview of how the mineral may look in different geologic settings. MINERALS TO IDENTIFY - is the identification of 20 minerals. It consists of an “interactive” PowerPoint that duplicates the lab setting. It allows you to perform tests on each unknown mineral and to make decisions as to its properties for the mineral’s identification. To assist you in your quest for mineral identification, an 8 page MINERAL IDENTIFICATION KEY is provided as a separate PowerPoint. It is required that you print this 8 page key (not the entire PowerPoint) and use it during the mineral identification process. You will enter your answers in the Mineral Identification Quiz in BlackBoard. This is an interactive PowerPoint and it is intended that you click on various links throughout the lesson. However, if you do accidently hit a key it may advance to the next slide in the list, which may not be the one you want to observe. You can go back by using either the “Backspace” key or the link to “Back to Page 1” box in the bottom right hand corner of each page. WARNING – This PowerPoint is over 200 pages in length so if you want to print out certain pages make sure to tell your printer which pages to print - not the entire powerpoint.
    [Show full text]
  • Stannoidite Cu8(Fe, Zn)3Sn2s12 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic
    Stannoidite Cu8(Fe, Zn)3Sn2S12 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: 222. Massive, in veinlets, to 1 mm. Physical Properties: Fracture: Uneven to subconchoidal. Hardness = ∼4 VHN = 181–274 (100 g load). D(meas.) = n.d. D(calc.) = [4.68] Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Brass-brown; in polished section, pinkish brown. Streak: Dark brown-gray. Luster: Metallic. Pleochroism: Distinct, pale salmon-brown to brown. Anisotropism: Strong; dark orange-red to yellow-gray. R1–R2: (400) 17.5–18.9, (420) 17.4–19.2, (440) 18.2–20.3, (460) 19.5–21.7, (480) 20.8–23.0, (500) 21.8–24.2, (520) 22.8–25.3, (540) 23.7–26.3, (560) 24.6–27.1, (580) 25.4–27.8, (600) 26.2–28.4, (620) 27.1–29.1, (640) 27.8–29.5, (660) 28.7–30.0, (680) 29.6–30.5, (700) 30.3–30.8 Cell Data: Space Group: I222. a = 10.767 b = 5.411 c = 16.118 Z = [2] X-ray Powder Pattern: Konjo mine, Japan. 3.11 (100), 1.906 (70), 1.621 (20b), 2.70 (16), 4.83 (10), 5.40 (5), 4.13 (4) Chemistry: (1) (2) (1) (2) Cu 37.2 38.2 Zn 1.2 0.8 Ag 0.1 Sn 16.5 18.7 Fe 12.5 11.9 S 31.2 29.9 Total 98.7 99.5 (1) Konjo mine, Japan; by electron microprobe, corresponding to (Cu7.22Ag0.01)Σ=7.23 (Fe2.76Zn0.23)Σ=2.99Sn1.71S12.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W
    .'.' .., Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie RUTILE GUMMITE IN GARNET RUBY CORUNDUM GOLD TORBERNITE GARNET IN MICA ANATASE RUTILE AJTUNITE AND TORBERNITE THULITE AND PYRITE MONAZITE EMERALD CUPRITE SMOKY QUARTZ ZIRCON TORBERNITE ~/ UBRAR'l USE ONLV ,~O NOT REMOVE. fROM LIBRARY N. C. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY Information Circular 24 Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie Raleigh 1978 Second Printing 1980. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from: North CarOlina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Geological Survey Section P. O. Box 27687 ~ Raleigh. N. C. 27611 1823 --~- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION The Geological Survey Section shall, by law"...make such exami­ nation, survey, and mapping of the geology, mineralogy, and topo­ graphy of the state, including their industrial and economic utilization as it may consider necessary." In carrying out its duties under this law, the section promotes the wise conservation and use of mineral resources by industry, commerce, agriculture, and other governmental agencies for the general welfare of the citizens of North Carolina. The Section conducts a number of basic and applied research projects in environmental resource planning, mineral resource explora­ tion, mineral statistics, and systematic geologic mapping. Services constitute a major portion ofthe Sections's activities and include identi­ fying rock and mineral samples submitted by the citizens of the state and providing consulting services and specially prepared reports to other agencies that require geological information. The Geological Survey Section publishes results of research in a series of Bulletins, Economic Papers, Information Circulars, Educa­ tional Series, Geologic Maps, and Special Publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Stillwellite-(Ce) (Ce, La, Ca)Bsio
    Stillwellite-(Ce) (Ce; La; Ca)BSiO5 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 3: As °at rhombohedral crystals, to 4 cm, and massive. Twinning: Observed about [100]. Physical Properties: Cleavage: One imperfect. Fracture: Conchoidal. Hardness = 6.5 D(meas.) = 4.57{4.60 D(calc.) = 4.67 » Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Red-brown to pale pink; colorless in thin section. Streak: White. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+) to biaxial (+). ! = 1.765{1.784 ² = 1.780{1.787 2V(meas.) = 0±{6± Cell Data: Space Group: P 31: a = 6.841{6.844 c = 6.700{6.702 Z = 3 X-ray Powder Pattern: Mary Kathleen mine, Australia. 3.43 (s), 2.96 (s), 2.13 (ms), 4.44 (m), 1.864 (m), 2.71 (mw), 2.24 (mw) Chemistry: (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) SiO2 22.40 22.06 La2O3 27.95 19.12 MgO 0.06 UO2 0.22 Ce2O3 33.15 30.82 CaO 0.95 0.34 ThO2 5.41 Pr2O3 1.82 F 0.30 + B2O3 12.23 [13.46] Nd2O3 5.36 H2O 0.85 Al2O3 0.42 Sm2O3 0.34 H2O¡ 0.10 Y2O3 0.74 0.28 Fe2O3 0.18 P2O5 0.67 Total [100.00] [99.26] (1) Mary Kathleen mine, Australia; recalculated to 100.00% after removal of very small amounts of uraninite and apatite determined by separate analysis. (2) Vico volcano, near Vetralla, Italy; by electron microprobe, B2O3 calculated from stoichiometry, original total given as 99.23%; corresponds to (Ce0:50La0:31Nd0:08Th0:05Pr0:03Ca0:02Sm0:01)§=1:00B1:02Si0:97O5: Occurrence: Locally abundant as a metasomatic replacement of metamorphosed calcareous sediments (Mary Kathleen mine, Australia); in alkalic pegmatites in syenite in an alkalic massif (Dara-i-Pioz massif, Tajikistan).
    [Show full text]