Justice Denied: Tsarnaev's Own Lawyer Ignores Evidence He Is Innocent Of
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Justice denied: Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing | Tru... https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that... Truth and Shadows Following the white rabbit Justice denied: Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing i 37 Votes 1 of 93 20/03/16 11:28 Justice denied: Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing | Tru... https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that... (https://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/tsarnaev-dzhokhar.jpg) By Craig McKee Dzhokhar Tsarnaev never had a chance. While there is significant evidence supporting the accused Boston bomber’s innocence, none of it made it into his trial, which just concluded with guilty verdicts on all 30 counts against him. It seems that law enforcement, the media, and especially Tsarnaev’s own lawyer, Judy Clarke, were focused on suppressing any evidence that could have undermined the official story of the bombing. The truth has been covered up just as effectively as it was the day Lee Harvey Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby. Clarke insured Tsarnaev’s conviction when she opened the trial by admitting that he had carried out the bombing on April 15, 2013 with his brother, 26-year-old Tamerlan, who was killed in the aftermath. Clarke painted Tamerlan as the instigator in an apparent effort to spare Dzhokhar from execution, but that may happen anyway as the trial now enters the sentencing phase. Clarke is known for her ability to keep her clients off death row (including Unabomber Ted Kaczyinski; alleged 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui; and Jared Loughner, who was convicted of shooting Rep. Gabrielle Giffords), but given the weakness of the evidence against Tsarnaev, Clarke’s strategy amounted to throwing in the towel before the trial even started. But what about making the prosecution prove guilt? To say that Clarke could have created reasonable doubt if she had wanted to is an understatement. In this article, we’ll look at the evidence that should have been introduced at Tsarnaev’s trial but wasn’t (Keep in mind that Dzhokhar had claimed his innocence (http://www.thewire.com/national/2013/05/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-walking-talking-and-claiming-hes-innocent /65741/), which conflicted with the supposed confession he wrote on the inside of the boat where he was captured on April 19, four days after the bombing). Most have taken for granted from the beginning that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar did what they are accused of doing. But how many would be surprised to learn that the evidence against them depends on the statements of just two people – and these just happen to be the two most suspicious characters in this incredible story. While there is little direct evidence of guilt, there is plenty that points to the brothers being set up as patsies. 2 of 93 20/03/16 11:28 Justice denied: Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing | Tru... https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that... Investigative reporter Russ Baker, who has written extensively about the case, explains in one of his articles (http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/03 /13/something-dead-wrong-investigating-mysterious-central-character-danny-part-2-2/) just how thin the evidence is against the brothers is (Note that the “Danny” referred to below is the alleged carjacking victim, whose identity remained hidden until the trial. He has since been identified as Chinese immigrant Dun Meng.): “Without the murder of the MIT policeman, followed by the carjacking confession reported by Danny, we would have no solved crime, no evidence linking anyone to the horrific Boston Marathon bombing except some grainy video of two guys wearing backpacks in a sea of other backpack- wearers near the source of the explosion. The assumption many of us make that the Tsarnaevs planted those bombs is just that: an assumption that, in the absence of the reported confession, has no evidence behind it.” No evidence behind it. THE OFFICIAL BOMBING STORY The official story of the Boston Marathon bombing is a very strange one indeed, particularly for what happened in the days that followed the main event. This version includes a murder, a carjacking, a shootout, an escape, a police manhunt, martial law, and even a hideout confession amid a hail of gunfire. As the story goes, two radicalized Muslim brothers of Chechen descent decided they wanted to strike out at a visible American target in retribution for the killing of Muslims around the world by the U.S. government. The brothers allegedly placed and detonated two pressure cooker bombs filled with shrapnel in separate locations – the blasts coming just a few seconds apart – near the finish line of the Marathon just before 3 p.m. on April 15, 2013. The brothers had seemingly gotten away with the crime until they took a series of inexplicable actions (this is on top of the fact that they chose to remain in the Boston area after the alleged bombing rather than simply getting out of town). These events started three days after the bombing when police released photos of the brothers and asked the public for help in identifying them. They were labelled as “suspects.” This, we’re left to conclude, spooked Tamerlan and Dzhokhar into making some very reckless decisions that brought about their downfall. On the night of the 18th, they are alleged to have killed MIT police officer Sean Collier in order to get his gun, although they didn’t take the gun. Then the brothers are alleged to have committed a carjacking and to have told the victim that they were responsible for both the Boston bombing and the Collier murder. We’re told that they took the victim for a drive that involved stops at a bank and a gas station. They took the carjack victim’s Mercedes SUV and then supposedly allowed him to escape so that he could tell authorities that his captors had admitted to being responsible for the bombings and the murder. Not very smart… The two followed this, we’re told, by leaving the scene of the carjacking with both the Honda Civic they arrived in and the stolen SUV, although they abandoned the Honda at some point. 3 of 93 20/03/16 11:28 Justice denied: Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing | Tru... https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that... (https://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/tsarnaev- brothers.jpg) Dzhokhar (white hat) and Tamerlan (black hat) at the Marathon. The allegedly stolen Mercedes was later spotted by police, we’re told, leading to a shootout in Watertown, Mass. It was there where Tamerlan was allegedly shot. Dzhokhar is supposed to have jumped into the SUV and driven over his brother’s body in escaping (possibly causing his death). Soon after, he allegedly abandoned the vehicle and ran off on foot, hiding in a boat parked behind a home. The owner noticed blood on the outside of the boat and that the cover had been disturbed, and he looked in to see Dzhokhar lying inside. Police were called, and this led to what we were told was an exchange of gunfire between Dzhokhar and police, although it came out later that the suspect was unarmed and that police had done all the shooting. These are what we’re told are the facts, although there are multiple versions of each element of the story. In fact, none of the versions makes any sense, but the inconsistency is definitely telling. Let’s take a look at the major elements of the story and how the official story is not borne out by the evidence in each one. THE EXERCISE An early clue that Boston was a false flag operation was the bomb “exercise” (http://www.storyleak.com/boston-marathon-runner-police-boston- 4 of 93 20/03/16 11:28 Justice denied: Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing | Tru... https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that... explosion-training-exercise/) that was going on at the exact same location and time as the actual bombing. This has become a tell-tale sign of false flags, particularly since 9/11 when numerous exercises were taking place that simulated the very thing that actually happened at the very time it was happening. Loudspeakers announced to the crowd near the finish line of the Marathon that they needn’t worry about the bomb squad and their bomb-sniffing dogs patrolling the area during the race because it was just an exercise. Incredibly, two hours before the blasts the Boston Globe tweeted (at 12:53 p.m.) that there would be a “controlled explosion opposite from the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.” Boston Public Library is right across the street from where the first blast went off just before 3 p.m. Quite a coincidence. Another tweet came later specifying the JFK Library (which is some distance away). It said: “Third incident: Explosion earlier today at the JFK Library.” Later still, the story changed again: “Fire earlier today likely unrelated to Marathon bombings.” No more talk of bomb squad activities. The most absurd example of an exercise being synchronized with an actual false flag event is the 7/7 London bombings of July 2005 when a simulation of the bombing of three underground stations was going on as those same stations were actually being bombed (not to mention a real bus bomb that was also reflected in the exercise).