No More Deaths: Direct Aid in the US-Mexico Border Zone Sophie Smith, Editor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AGAINST the DAY No More Deaths: Direct Aid in the US-Mexico Border Zone Sophie Smith, Editor These essays were written just before the onset of the Trump administration. Since the time of writing, many of the direct aid projects described here have become more imperiled. Over the past several months, for example, the lon- gest standing desert medical clinic run by No More Deaths has come under attack by the US Border Patrol with the cooperation of the US Attorney’s offices. Aid workers are also now being denied access to multiple public lands jurisdictions, enduring escalating levels surveillance and intimidation by numerous federal and state agencies. In this context, it is becoming increas- ingly clear that the powers that be are working to disrupt the provision of basic necessities to those facing state violence and death in the Southwest des- ert. At the same time, white supremacy is on the rise in the borderlands. Right-wing paramilitary groups conducting armed vigilante patrols are becoming more organized and emboldened. From multiple sides, the human- itarian efforts of nongovernmental organizations are facing new threats. With criminalization and federal prosecutions on the rise, the border strug- gle is now taking place in a political landscape of heightened tensions. We thus find ourselves writing in a moment of danger—for those in the border region, as well as for migrant peoples and communities across North America and around the world. For those of us living and working on the border, one thing is clear: the protection of migrants, refugees, families, and community members in the borderlands will not be guaranteed by the politicians and lawmakers. Rather, to disrupt the atrocities on the ground we must continue innovating and defending the work of direct aid. Sophie Smith Arivaca, Arizona August 2017 Downloaded from https://read.dukeupress.edu/south-atlantic-quarterly/article-pdf/116/4/851/518870/011_deaths.pdf by DUKE UNIV-PERKINS LIBRARY user on 08 February 2018 AGAINST the DAY Sophie Smith Introduction: No More Deaths Podrán cortar todas las flores, pero no podrán detener la primavera. They can cut all the flowers, but they can never stop the coming of the spring. (My translation.) —Pablo Neruda Over the past twenty years, the wilderness of the southwest United States has been transformed into a deadly arena for those attempting to enter the United States without documentation. The clandestine crossing is now gov- erned by a militarized homeland security establishment and a widening set of exploitation industries that bank on the deepening of human tragedy. In the mix, volunteers with the humanitarian organization No More Deaths have been working to offer a critical measure of care and protection to migrants and refugees who find themselves stranded in the backcountry.1 Every day in the arid deserts of southern Arizona, border activists and rural residents undertake concrete efforts to provide food, water, and medical care to those caught out in the struggle for survival. While the name “No More Deaths” expresses a political aspiration, aid work in the border region is in truth a highly pragmatic undertaking, as small humanitarian organizations cannot ultimately guarantee the protection of all those who enter the vast geo- graphic expanse of the border territory. Nonetheless, providing on-the-ground assistance has developed into a powerful practice, ethos, and, arguably, a poli- tics in the region—one that prioritizes direct antiracist intervention as a means of contesting the daily harms dealt by the border security regime. The essays presented in this installment of Against the Day are authored by activist-scholars who have substantial experience working with The South Atlantic Quarterly 116:4, October 2017 doi 10.1215/00382876-4235062 © 2017 Duke University Press Downloaded from https://read.dukeupress.edu/south-atlantic-quarterly/article-pdf/116/4/851/518870/011_deaths.pdf by DUKE UNIV-PERKINS LIBRARY user on 08 February 2018 Smith • Introduction: No More Deaths 853 No More Deaths to provide disaster relief on the ground in the Sonoran Des- ert of southern Arizona. Amid growing concern over the Trump administra- tion’s designs for wall building and deportation, we offer a picture of the deadly play of immigration and enforcement already taking place on the bor- der. Our writing goals are ultimately transformative: to provide a closer view of the contemporary border struggle and to protest the massive loss of life being wrought by US immigration enforcement. Walking in the Wilderness The border is a broken strand of barbed wire lying on the dirt floor of a tran- quil desert canyon. Gray-green mesquite trees reach up from the baking ground. Hawks, ravens, and vultures glide in a transnational network through the long blue sky. Nearby, a dry riverbed betrays dozens of footprints of those who have recently crossed through. Empty water bottles, tuna fish cans, and plastic granola wrappers left over from a nearby humanitarian aid supply drop toss about in the hot wind. Otherwise, all is quiet. To the east, twenty-five-foot metallic poles propped in vertical succes- sion slice a hilly city in two. On the north side sits Nogales, Arizona, dotted with fast food restaurants, gas stations, and taxi stands. To the south, the metropolis of Nogales, Sonora, rises. Colorful adobe homes, churches, and apartment buildings range across the sloping landscape. Downtown, near the colossal eggshell awning of the international port of entry, community members gather on both sides of the border wall to hold hands through the steel beams in the location where a sixteen-year-old was killed by a US Border Patrol agent.2 Graffiti reading SOMOS UN PUEBLO SIN FRONTERAS (WE ARE A PEOPLE WITHOUT BORDERS) defiantly adorns its base. In such binational border cities where the wall has been built, it stands as an impos- ing architectural feat. Outside of urban areas, the construction dwindles into shorter slats, triangular vehicle barriers, and eventually diminishes to thin wire cattle fencing, or nothing at all. Foot traffic flows into the open desert. At present, the specter of wall building on the Southwest border looms large. The protest anthem “no ban, no wall” rings out across the globe as a challenge to the nationalist rhetoric of the Trump administration. For those of us working on the ground in the US-Mexico borderlands, however, the demand for “no wall” is just as perplexing as it is encouraging: this cry to transnational solidarity seems to deny the existence of more than six hundred fifty miles of reinforced barriers already carving up the Southwest landscape. Moreover, what is missing from the national conversation is how Downloaded from https://read.dukeupress.edu/south-atlantic-quarterly/article-pdf/116/4/851/518870/011_deaths.pdf by DUKE UNIV-PERKINS LIBRARY user on 08 February 2018 854 The South Atlantic Quarterly • Against the Day • October 2017 walls already function as a powerful policing tactic on the southern border— one that is not only offensive and expensive but also, and most critically, deadly. This history of walling reaches back more than twenty years to the 1990s—a decade that revolutionized US-Mexico border control. The year 1994 is often remembered as a moment of radical economic liberalization on the continent with the signing of the North American Free Trade Agree- ment (NAFTA). However, beyond economic expansion, 1994 was also a year of radical transformation for US border-enforcement policy. It was then, in anticipation of a new surge of unauthorized labor-driven migration, that the Border Patrol met with Department of Defense tacticians versed in low- intensity conflict doctrine to discuss militarizing the southern border. At the time, officials asserted that sealing off the entire two thousand miles of bina- tional territory and achieving a 100 percent apprehension rate of unauthor- ized border crossers would be “an unreasonable goal” (US Border Patrol 1994: 6). Instead, the Border Patrol adopted an enforcement strategy called “prevention through deterrence,” which would regulate undocumented migration by making the crossing increasingly dangerous (6). The concept was a geographical one: historically, most undocumented border crossings cycled through urban areas where, at the time, it was rela- tively easy to enter the United States without inspection. In 1994, the Border Patrol decided to shift the flow of unauthorized immigration away from bor- der cities and into remote wilderness areas just inside of the US interior. The agency resolved that it would build walls and concentrate personnel and sur- veillance technology in and around urban ports of entry as a means of deflect- ing unauthorized migration out into the open desert. In effect, to enter the United States, people without papers would be “forced over more hostile ter- rain,” where they would have to endure multiday treks on foot through a treacherous landscape (12). The Border Patrol predicted that many would “find themselves in mortal danger,” being cut off from civilization, resources, and rescue in the backcountry (2). By transforming the migration trail into a potentially deadly ordeal, the agency reasoned that others would be dissuaded from attempting the journey. In sum, the Border Patrol speculated that tacti- cally enhancing the dangers facing border crossers would diminish the over- all rate of unauthorized migration into the United States, amounting to a policing program of relative prevention through aggressive deterrence. Over the last two decades, reinforced walls have gone up in and around border cities, and vehicle barriers have been scattered around the desert to Downloaded from https://read.dukeupress.edu/south-atlantic-quarterly/article-pdf/116/4/851/518870/011_deaths.pdf by DUKE UNIV-PERKINS LIBRARY user on 08 February 2018 Smith • Introduction: No More Deaths 855 force migration to flow on foot through the most rugged regions of the southwest borderlands.