DOCSLIB.ORG

ARAS-2018-Annual-Report.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Arkansas Archeological Survey Annual Report for fiscal year 2017–2018 A Division of the University of Arkansas System Arkansas Archeological Survey Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 Highlights for 2017–2018 .........................................................................................................2 Reports of the Survey Research Stations Toltec Mounds Archeological State Park ............................................................................ 20 Parkin Archeological State Park ............................................................................................ 26 University of Arkansas at Fayetteville .................................................................................. 32 University of Arkansas at Fort Smith ................................................................................... 40 Winthrop Rockefeller Institute ............................................................................................. 45 University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff ..................................................................................... 51 University of Arkansas at Monticello .................................................................................. 56 Henderson State University................................................................................................... 61 Southern Arkansas University............................................................................................... 67 Arkansas State University....................................................................................................... 72 Reports of the Coordinating Office, Fayetteville The Survey Director ................................................................................................................ 82 The State Archeologist ............................................................................................................ 84 The Survey Registrar ............................................................................................................... 87 Sponsored Research Program ............................................................................................... 91 Computer Services and Archaeogeophysical Applications ............................................ 98 Publications Program ............................................................................................................108 Photographic and Graphic Arts Support ..........................................................................111 Educational Outreach ...........................................................................................................112 Partners in Preservation .......................................................................................................116 Accounting & Administrative Staff ....................................................................................122 How to Contact the Arkansas Archeological Survey .....................................................123 Appendix 1. Reports & Publications by ARAS Staff, 2017–2018 ...............................124 Appendix 2. Presented Papers, Symposia & Workshops, 2017–2018 ........................127 Photo Identifications & Credits ..........................................................................................130 The 2017–2018 Annual Report was compiled and edited by Deborah Sabo. Layout, design, and cover by Deborah Sabo. No state funds were used to print this document. ii University of Arkansas System Arkansas Archeological Survey Introduction he Arkansas Archeological Survey (ARAS) is a part of the University of Arkansas System. Our mission Tis to study and protect archeological sites in Arkansas, to preserve and manage archeological informa- tion and collections, and to communicate what we learn to the people of Arkansas. Cooperative agreements with seven state university campuses, two state parks, and the UA System’s Winthrop Rockefeller Institute enable scholars at research stations around the state to carry out this mission. The Survey has been a model for statewide archeological programs in the United States and around the world. Our coordinating office (CO) in Fayetteville is the ARAS administrative body. The Director, the State Archeologist, the ARAS registrar, the fiscal office, publications staff, and outreach programs operate from the CO. The registrar maintains a central archive of all archeological site records for the state. The coordinat- ing office building also contains the University of Arkansas Museum Collections Facility. The Survey acts as a repository for archeological collections originating from state and federally funded projects in Arkansas, our own research, private consulting firms, and donations. Also at the coordinating office are our sponsored research program (SRP) and computer services program (CSP) which support themselves in part through grants, contracts, and cost-share agreements with local, state, and federal agencies. The CSP maintains several websites with educational information on Arkansas archeology and frequently updated stories about our projects. The CSP also supplies research support through our archaeogeophysical program, employing the latest technologies for nondestructive detection of subsurface features at archeological sites. Professional archeologists at our research stations teach college courses in anthropology and assist their university museums, or develop materials for public interpretation at the state parks, in addition to con- ducting basic research in their areas. Survey archeologists help to increase our knowledge of the past and its relationship to the present by working closely with local, state, and federal government agencies, American Indian tribes, college students, school teachers and K-12 students, tourists, fellow scholars, land owners and managers, amateur archeologists, and all Arkansas residents interested in archeology, prehistory, and the early history of the state. At the Survey, science and service go hand-in-hand. George Sabo III, Ph.D. Director 1 Arkansas Archeological Survey Highlights for the Year Scientific Achievements & Archeological Mission 2017–2018 • Survey staff authored or coauthored47 print or digital publications and reports, and presented 55 papers or posters at meetings and conferences in 2017–2018. • The Survey’sAMASDA database (Automated Management of Archeological Site Data in Arkansas) is one of the oldest and best computerized site file systems in the country. Our computer services program and registrar’s office personnel are constantly working to expand and upgrade the AMASDA system to add new functionality. The system is now available online (password protected) for qualified researchers. Contractors may subscribe per project or for an annual fee. • 527 new archeological sites were recorded, bringing the total number of sites in Arkansas site files to49,306 . • 135 new archeological projects were entered into the database, bringing the projects total to 7206. • The Survey registrar facilitated2100 requests for information from the Arkansas site files by students, researchers, and project managers. This included19 graduate student and academic research projects. We assisted local, state, and federal entities, six American Indian Tribes, and 46 private firms conducting projects in Arkansas. • We conducted projects supported with new funds generated by grants and cost-share agreements totaling $107,040. • Volunteer participation in our projects, totaling 14,146 hours, continued to show a high level of interest in archeology. • Digital Data Collection Initiative. A DDCI working group within ARAS led by Carl Drexler (ARAS-SAU) developed an “action plan” to transition us from paper records filled out by hand to use of a digital platform for creating all of the records col- lected during fieldwork and uploading those records from the field to our servers. This involved making digital versions of the many forms we use (excavation unit level records, feature forms, profile forms, Field Serial Number log sheets, photo record sheets, special sample forms, etc.), selecting associated hardware platforms (weatherized tablets for use in the field), and devel- oping software for uploading the data. Other members of the group were Elizabeth Horton (ARAS-TMRS), Jamie Brandon (ARAS-UAF), Emily Beahm (ARAS-WRI), John Samuelsen (ARAS-CSP), and Teka McGlothlin (ARAS-Registrar). • Team members worked to create an interactive fieldwork database using iPads for data entry. The group determined that FileMaker and iPads were the best options for ARAS. With input from the group, Samuelsen wrote a proposal to the ARAS Director for internal funding for a pilot project. This was approved. A Mac server was created to manage the ARAS iPads and the FileMaker software was installed on the archeology.uark.edu server. The team worked together to create a database and interface for the fieldwork data. The system was tested by Carl Drexler in the field at Pea Ridge during sum- mer 2018, with positive results. The team plans to expand the use of this system for lab data entry next year. 2 Annual Report 2017–2018 • Our publications program is thriving with a new Research Series volume published in 2017, another scheduled for 2018, two Popular Series volumes in production, and two more accepted for publication. • A major development took place this year for ARAS-Publications
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
  • Caddo Archeology Journal, Volume 19. 2009

    Caddo Archeology Journal, Volume 19. 2009

    CCaddoaddo AArcheologyrcheology JJournalournal Volume 19 2009 CADDO ARCHEOLOGY JOURNAL Department of Sociology P.O. Box 13047, SFA Station Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-3047 EDITORIAL BOARD TIMOTHY K. PERTTULA 10101 Woodhaven Dr. Austin, Texas 78753 e-mail: [email protected] GEORGE AVERY P.O. Box 13047, SFA Station Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-3047 e-mail: [email protected] LIAISON WITH THE CADDO NATION OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT CAST Tribal Historic Preservation Offi cer Caddo Nation of Oklahoma P.O. Box 487 Binger, OK 73009 e-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1522-0427 Printed in the United States of America at Morgan Printing in Austin, Texas 2009 Table of Contents The Caddo and the Caddo Conference 1 Pete Gregory An Account of the Birth and Growth of Caddo Archeology, as Seen by Review of 50 Caddo Conferences, 1946-2008 3 Hester A. Davis and E. Mott Davis CADDO ARCHEOLOGY JOURNAL ◆ iii The Caddo and the Caddo Conference* Pete Gregory There was one lone Caddo at the early Caddo Conference held at the University of Oklahoma campus—Mrs. Vynola Beaver Newkumet—then there was a long gap. In 1973, the Chairman of the Caddo Nation, Melford Wil- liams, was the banquet speaker for the Conference, which was held in Natchitoches, Louisiana. A panel, consisting of Thompson Williams, Vynola Newkumet, Phil Newkumet, and Pete Gregory, was also part of that conference. Subsequent to 1973, Caddo representatives have not only been invited, but have attended the majority of the conferences. Caddo Nation chairpeople who have attended include Melford Williams, Mary Pat Francis, Hank Shemayme, Hubert Halfmoon, Elmo Clark, Vernon Hunter, and La Rue Martin Parker.
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Wiggins Prairie Mitigation Bank, Hillsborough County, Florida

    Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Wiggins Prairie Mitigation Bank, Hillsborough County, Florida

    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE WIGGINS PRAIRIE MITIGATION BANK, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: Southern States Land & Timber, LLC 2205 W. Pinhook Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, Louisiana 70508 Prepared by: Florida’s First Choice in Cultural Resource Management Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 (941) 379-6206 Toll Free: 1-800-735-9906 November 2016 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE WIGGINS PRAIRIE MITIGATION BANK, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: Southern States Land & Timber, LLC 2205 W. Pinhook Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, Louisiana 70508 By: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Marion Almy – Project Manager Elizabeth A. Horvath – Project Archaeologist Katherine Baar – Archaeologist November 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) performed a cultural resource assessment survey (CRAS) of 79 acres of the Wiggins Prairie Mitigation Bank for Southern States Land & Timber, LLC in October 2016. Portions of the 492-acre parcel had been previously surveyed, and the current investigations focused on those areas where subsurface disturbance is anticipated. The purpose of the survey was to locate and identify any archaeological sites and historic resources within the project area of potential effects (APE) and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The archaeological APE consists of those lands that will be subject to subsurface disturbance and have not previously been surveyed for cultural resources. The historical APE consists of the entire property. The survey was requested by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), who reviewed U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) file number SAJ-2016-00429-TMF (Parsons 2016).
  • Department of Anthropology the University of South Florida 4202 E

    Department of Anthropology the University of South Florida 4202 E

    T H O M A S J. P L U C K H A H N Department of Anthropology The University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Ave., SOC107 Tampa, FL 33620-8100 [email protected] 813-549-9742 EDUCATION Ph.D., 2002, Anthropology, University of Georgia. M.A., 1994, Anthropology, University of Georgia. B.A., 1988, cum laude with Honors, Anthropology (Spanish minor), University of Georgia. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2017-present Professor. Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida. 2014-2017 Associate Chair. Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida. 2010-2017 Associate Professor. Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida. 2006-2010 Assistant Professor. Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida. 2004-2006 Assistant Professor. Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma. 2003-2004 Visiting Assistant Professor. Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma. 2001-2002 Instructor. Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia. 1996-2002 Graduate Teaching Assistant. Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia. OTHER PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS 1994-2003 Senior Archaeologist. Southeastern Archeological Services, Inc., Athens, Georgia. 1999 Field Supervisor. Mixteca Alta Settlement Pattern Survey, Oaxaca, Mexico (study funded by the National Science Foundation). 1994 Consulting Archaeologist. Southern Research, Fort Stewart Military Reservation, Georgia. 1993-1994 Project Archaeologist. Brockington and Associates, Norcross, Georgia. 1989-1992 Archaeological field technician for various firms and agencies in the eastern United States and Europe. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for American Archaeology, 1992-present Southeastern Archaeological Conference, 1992-present (lifetime member since 2010) Florida Archaeological Council, 2006-present Florida Anthropological Society, 2007-present Society for Georgia Archaeology, 1994-present Georgia Council of Professional Archaeologists, 1995-1999 THOMAS J.
  • Feasting and Communal Ritual in the Lower Mississippi Valley, Ad 700–1000

    Feasting and Communal Ritual in the Lower Mississippi Valley, Ad 700–1000

    FEASTING AND COMMUNAL RITUAL IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY, AD 700–1000 Megan Crandal Kassabaum A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2014 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry Dale L. Hutchinson Brett H. Riggs Valerie Lambert © 2014 Megan Crandal Kassabaum ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Megan Crandal Kassabaum: Feasting and Communal Ritual in the Lower Mississippi Valley, AD 700–1000 (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines prehistoric activity at the Feltus site (22Je500) in Jefferson County, Mississippi, to elucidate how Coles Creek (AD 700–1200) platform mound sites were used. Data from excavations undertaken by the Feltus Archaeological Project from 2006 to 2012 support the conclusion that Coles Creek people utilized Feltus episodically for some 400 years, with little evidence of permanent habitation. More specifically, the ceramic, floral, and faunal data suggest that Feltus provided a location for periodic ritual events focused around food consumption, post-setting, and mound building. The rapidity with which the middens at Feltus were deposited and the large size of the ceramic vessels implies that the events occurring there brought together large groups of people for massive feasting episodes. The vessel form assemblage is dominated by open bowls and thus suggests an emphasis on food consumption, with less evidence for food preparation and virtually none for food storage. Overall, the ceramic assemblage emphasizes a great deal of continuity in the use of the Feltus landscape from the earliest occupation, during the Hamilton Ridge phase, through the latest, during the Balmoral phase.
  • Seattle 2015

    Seattle 2015

    Peripheries and Boundaries SEATTLE 2015 48th Annual Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology January 6-11, 2015 Seattle, Washington CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS (Our conference logo, "Peripheries and Boundaries," by Coast Salish artist lessLIE) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 01 – Symposium Abstracts Page 13 – General Sessions Page 16 – Forum/Panel Abstracts Page 24 – Paper and Poster Abstracts (All listings include room and session time information) SYMPOSIUM ABSTRACTS [SYM-01] The Multicultural Caribbean and Its Overlooked Histories Chairs: Shea Henry (Simon Fraser University), Alexis K Ohman (College of William and Mary) Discussants: Krysta Ryzewski (Wayne State University) Many recent historical archaeological investigations in the Caribbean have explored the peoples and cultures that have been largely overlooked. The historical era of the Caribbean has seen the decline and introduction of various different and opposing cultures. Because of this, the cultural landscape of the Caribbean today is one of the most diverse in the world. However, some of these cultures have been more extensively explored archaeologically than others. A few of the areas of study that have begun to receive more attention in recent years are contact era interaction, indentured labor populations, historical environment and landscape, re-excavation of colonial sites with new discoveries and interpretations, and other aspects of daily life in the colonial Caribbean. This symposium seeks to explore new areas of overlooked peoples, cultures, and activities that have
  • An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas

    An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas

    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-2004 An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas William Glenn Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hill, William Glenn, "An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas" (2004). Master's Theses. 3873. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3873 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN INTENSIVE SURFACE COLLECTION AND INTRASITE SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS FROM THE COY MOUND SITE (3LN20), CENTRAL ARKANSAS by William Glenn Hill A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degreeof Master of Arts Department of Anthropology WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 2004 Copyright by William Glenn Hill 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Foremost, my pursuit in archaeology would be less meaningful without the accomplishments of Dr. Randall McGuire, Dr. H. Martin Wobst, and Dr. Michael Nassaney. They have provided a theoretical perspective in archaeology that has integrated and given greater meaning to my own social and archaeological interests. I would especially like to especially thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Michael Nassaney, for the stimulating opportunity to explore research within this theoretical perspective, and my other committee members, Dr.
  • Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Pottery at the Bayshore Homes Site in Pinellas County, Florida

    Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Pottery at the Bayshore Homes Site in Pinellas County, Florida

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 8-2014 Portable X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Pottery at the Bayshore Homes Site in Pinellas County, Florida Rachel Nostrom University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Nostrom, Rachel, "Portable X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Pottery at the Bayshore Homes Site in Pinellas County, Florida" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5285 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Portable X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Pottery at the Bayshore Homes Site in Pinellas County, Florida by Rachel Victoria Nostrom A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Brent Weisman, Ph.D. Robert H. Tykot, Ph.D. Lori Collins, Ph.D. Date of Approval: August 2014 Keywords: Clay, Florida geology, Statistical analysis, Weeden Island period, Manasota period Copyright ! 2014, Rachel Victoria Nostrom DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my mother and father. They taught me at an early age to do what makes me happy and supported my wanderings through this world with love and understanding. I credit them with my love of learning, my desire to know the why of everything, and my healthy skepticism of established paradigms.
  • No. 26: the MISSISSIPPI DE SOTO TRAIL MAPPING PROJECT

    No. 26: the MISSISSIPPI DE SOTO TRAIL MAPPING PROJECT

    Archaeological Report No. 26 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project David Morgan Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi 1996 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 26 Patricia Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director Typeset by Lesley Range ISBN: 0-938896-76-8 Copyright © 1997 Mississippi Department of Archives and History CONTENTS Introduction. ......................................... .. 1 Project Overview. ..................................... .. 1 Research Universe 2 Site Selection and Plotting Procedures .................... .. 2 Historic Overview. .................................... .. 3 Route Comparisons. ................................... .. 4 Site File Contributions. ................................ .. 5 Comments 7 Conclusion. .......................................... .. 8 Bibliography ........................................ .. 10 Index to Named Sites in Appendix III .................... .. 17 Diagnostic Ceramics by Region Appendix I Maps ...................................... .. Appendix II Site Inventory Forms . .. Appendix III (located on microfiche) List of Maps in Appendix II The Entire State of Mississippi Map 1 Inset A ......................................... Map 2 Inset B Map 3 Inset C . Map 4 Inset D ......................................... Map 5 Inset E Map 6 "Spaghetti" Map Map 7 The Mississippi De Soto Trail Mapping Project By David Morgan Introduction The route of the Hernando de Soto expedition through the state of Mississippi
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents

    Archeology Inventory Table of Contents

    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
  • Archaeologist Volume 57 No

    Archaeologist Volume 57 No

    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 57 NO. 1 WINTER 2007 PUBLISHED BY THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio BACK ISSUES OF OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST 1956 thru 1967 out of print Term 1968 - 1999 $ 2.50 Expires A.S.O. OFFICERS 1951 thru 1955 REPRINTS - sets only $100.00 2008 President Rocky Falleti, 5904 South Ave., Youngstown, OH 2000 thru 2002 $ 5.00 44512(330)788-1598. 2003 $ 6.00 2008 Vice President Michael Van Steen, 5303 Wildman Road, Add $0.75 For Each Copy of Any Issue South Charleston, OH 45314. The Archaeology of Ohio, by Robert N. Converse regular $60.00 Author's Edition $75.00 2008 Immediate Past President John Mocic, Box 170 RD #1, Dilles Postage, Add $ 2.50 Bottom, OH 43947 (740) 676-1077. Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are generally 2008 Executive Secretary George Colvin, 220 Darbymoor Drive, out of print but copies are available from time to time. Write to business office Plain City, OH 43064 (614) 879-9825. for prices and availability. 2008 Treasurer Gary Kapusta, 32294 Herriff Rd., Ravenna, OH 44266 ASO CHAPTERS (330) 296-2287. Aboriginal Explorers Club 2008 Recording Secretary Cindy Wells, 15001 Sycamore Road, President: Mark Kline, 1127 Esther Rd., Wellsville, OH 43968 (330) 532-1157 Mt. Vernon, OH 43050 (614) 397-4717. Beau Fleuve Chapter 2008 Webmaster Steven Carpenter, 529 Gray St., Plain City, OH. President: Richard Sojka, 11253 Broadway, Alden, NY 14004 (716) 681-2229 43064 (614) 873-5159. Blue Jacket Chapter 2010 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Drive, Plain City, President: Ken Sowards, 9201 Hildgefort Rd„ Fort Laramie, OH 45845 (937) 295-3764 OH 43064(614)873-5471.