DOCSLIB.ORG

F TAMBE ENDOH Orcid.Org 0000-0002-2813-3636

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F TAMBE ENDOH Orcid.Org 0000-0002-2813-3636 Selective morality in the pursuit of international criminal justice with particular reference to Article 13 of the Rome Statute F TAMBE ENDOH orcid.org 0000-0002-2813-3636 Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Laws at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof. MLM MBAO Graduation: July 2019 Student number: 26485834 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION BY CANDIDATE ..................................................................... viii DECLARATION BY PROMOTER ....................................................................... ix DEDICATION ................................................................................................... x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................... xii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................ xiii TABLE OF STATUTES ................................................................................... xxiv TABLE OF CASES .......................................................................................... xxv ABSTRACT ............................................................................................... xxxiv CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY ................................................................. 1 1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM .............................................................. 11 1.3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ................................................ 19 1.4 DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS ................................................................. 20 1.4.1 Morality .................................................................................................... 20 1.4.2 Jus cogens ................................................................................................ 21 1.4.3 Serious crimes in international law .............................................................. 22 i 1.4.4 Universal jurisdiction .................................................................................. 23 1.5 THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION AND THE DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR EXTRADITE ................................................................................. 24 1.6 RATIONALE AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY ................................. 33 1.7 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................ 36 1.7.1 ICC and the concept of complementarity ..................................................... 37 1.7.2 ICC and the competing claims of peace v. justice ......................................... 40 1.7.3 ICC and the concept of universal jurisdiction ................................................ 44 1.8 DATA COLLECTION AND METHODOLOGY .............................................. 48 1.8.1 Data collection and analysis ........................................................................ 49 1.8.2 Triangulation ............................................................................................. 49 1.8.3 Reliability and trustworthiness .................................................................... 50 1.9 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY ............................................ 51 1.10 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................... 54 1.11 SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 54 CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................. 56 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION AND PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM .......................... 56 2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 56 2.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ...................................................................................... 57 2.3 CODIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAWS RELATING TO ARMED CONFLICTS ................................................................................. 59 ii 2.4 THE BIRTH OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION ........................ 63 2.4.1 Significance of the Yalta Conference and the veto power rhetoric .................. 65 2.4.2 United Nations’ contribution towards global peace and security ..................... 67 2.5 THE NUREMBERG TRIALS ..................................................................... 70 2.5.1 Significance of the Nuremberg Tribunal ....................................................... 74 2.6 THE TOKYO TRIALS ............................................................................... 75 2.7 EMERGENCE OF VICTOR’S JUSTICE ...................................................... 77 2.8 POST-NUREMBERG DEVELOPMENTS .................................................... 81 2.8.1 The genesis of the law on Genocide ............................................................ 82 2.8.2 The Geneva Conventions of 1949 regulating the conduct of warfare .............. 83 2.8.3 The work of the International Law Commission ............................................ 87 2.8.4 Ad hoc tribunals ........................................................................................ 92 2.8.5 Hybrid Courts ............................................................................................ 99 2.9 SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 102 CHAPTER THREE ......................................................................................... 105 THE CREATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ..................... 105 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 105 3.2 TOWARDS THE DRAFTING OF THE ROME STATUTE ............................ 105 3.2.1 Challenges from the USA and Allies ............................................................ 108 3.2.2 Post-Nuremberg developments and the United States hegemony ................. 111 3.2.3 United States proposed model of an International Criminal Court .................. 113 iii 3.2.4 The challenge of a ‘Proprio Motu’ prosecutor ............................................... 117 3.3 TOWARDS AN IDEAL INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL ............ 119 3.3.1 The principle of complementarity ............................................................... 120 3.4 COMMITMENT BY STATES PARTIES TO THE ROME STATUTE .............. 122 3.4.1 States Parties Cooperation towards enforcement ......................................... 123 3.5 COOPERATION BY NON- STATES PARTIES ......................................... 127 3.6 PRECONDITIONS TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION .................... 129 3.7 TERRITORIAL AND CRIMINAL JURISDICTION OF THE ICC ................ 131 3.7.1 Territorial jurisdiction ................................................................................ 132 3.7.2 Criminal jurisdiction .................................................................................. 135 3.7.2.1 The crime of genocide ............................................................................ 135 3.7.2.2 Crimes against humanity ........................................................................ 137 3.7.2.3 War crimes ............................................................................................ 140 3.7.2.4 The crime of aggression ......................................................................... 143 3.8 DEGREE OF PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMISSION OF SERIOUS CRIMES .................................................................................... 146 3.8.1 Planning .................................................................................................. 147 3.8.2 Instigating ............................................................................................... 149 3.8.3 Ordering .................................................................................................. 150 3.8.4 Committing .............................................................................................. 151 4.8.5 Aiding and abetting ................................................................................... 152 3.8.6 Joint criminal enterprise ............................................................................ 154 iv 3.9 SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 156 CHAPTER FOUR ........................................................................................... 159 THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE SOURCES AND PRINCIPLES OF LAW UNDERPINNING THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT .................................................................... 159 4.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 159 4.2 THE MEANING OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW ............... 160 4.3 SOURCES OF LAW RELEVANT TO INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE ................................................................................... 166 4.3.1 Customary international law ............................................................. 167 4.3.2 General principles of law recognized by civilized nations...................... 170 4.3.3 Subsidiary sources for determining international
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 26 May 2005 Dear Madam President, I Have The
    THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 26 May 2005 Dear Madam President, I have the honour to refer to General Assembly resolution 58/284 (2004) of 8 April 2004 in which the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to invite the Special Court for Sierra Leone to adopt a completion strategy and also requested the Secretary-General to inform both the Security Council and the General Assembly at its 59th session about this matter. In accordance with the above-mentioned resolution, I am pleased to forward to the Security Council the final completion strategy which has been prepared by the Special Court and endorsed by the Management Committee of the Court which is responsible for advising me on the non-judicial aspects of the Court's work. Please accept, Madam President, the assurances of my highest consideration. -KofVA. Annan Her Excellency Ms. Ellen Margrethe L0j President of the Security Council New York THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 26 May 2005 Dear Mr. President, I have the honour to refer to General Assembly resolution 58/284 (2004) of 8 April 2004 in which the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to invite the Special Court for Sierra Leone to adopt a completion strategy and also requested the Secretary-General to inform both the Security Council and the General Assembly at its 59th session about this matter. In accordance with the above-mentioned resolution, I am pleased to forward to the General Assembly the final completion strategy which has been prepared by the Special Court and endorsed by the Management Committee of the Court which is responsible for advising me on the non-judicial aspects of the Court's work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone Volume I
    The Law Reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone Volume I - Book I The Law Reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone Volume I Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu (The AFRC Case) Book I Edited by Charles Chernor Jalloh Simon M. Meisenberg ᆕ 2012 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The law reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone / edited by Charles C. Jalloh, Simon M. Meisenberg. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-18911-9 (hardback : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-90-04-22398-1 (e-book) 1. Special Court for Sierra Leone. 2. International criminal law--Sierra Leone--Cases. 3. International criminal courts--Netherlands. I. Jalloh, Charles. II. Meisenberg, Simon M. KZ1208.S53A253 2012 341.6’90268664--dc23 2012010697 Suggested (sample) citation: Judgement, Brima, Kamara and Kanu (‘AFRC’) (SCSL-2004-16-T), Trial Chamber II, 20 June 2007, para. 80 in Jalloh/Meisenberg, SCSL Law Reports - AFRC, Vol. I/2, p. 1229. ISBN 978 90 04 18911 9 (hardback, set) ISBN 978 90 04 22561 9 (hardback, book I) ISBN 978 90 04 22562 6 (hardback, book II) E-ISBN 978 90 04 22398 1 (e-book) ISBN 978 90 04 22161 1 (hardback, complete set) E-ISBN 978 90 04 22162 8 (e-book, complete set) Copyright 2012 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. ƺƹƫƹƴƶƫưƴƣƽƫƶƶƫƹơƺƽƻƺƽƞƿƣƾƿƩƣƫƸƻƽƫƹƿƾƽƫƶƶᄕ ƶƺƟƞƶƽƫƣƹƿƞƶᄕ ƺƿƣƫǀƟƶƫƾƩƫƹƨᄕ IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhofff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Report of the President of the Special Court for Sierra Leone
    Eighth Annual Report of the President of the Special Court for Sierra Leone June 2010 to May 2011 Eighth Annual Report of the President of the Special Court for Sierra Leone June 2010 to May 2011 contents Foreword 5 outreach and Public Affairs 43 significant Media events 43 Introduction 9 Video screening of trial summaries 43 Public Lectures 43 Judicial Proceedings 11 Legacy specific Activities 44 Trial chamber II 11 civil society Visits to the Hague 44 The Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor 11 school Visits and other Programmes 44 The Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara & Kanu 14 court Visits and tours 45 Appeals chamber 14 townhall Meetings 45 Interlocutory Appeals in the Hague sub-office 45 Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor 14 office of the President 18 Legacy 47 other Activities of the chambers 18 Principal Legacy Initiatives of the Registry Activities of the President 19 sections 47 site Projects 48 office of the Prosecutor 22 Principal Legacy Initiatives of the office Residual Issues 51 of the Prosecutor 23 Update on the Residual Activities of the special court 51 office of the Registrar 25 Annexes 52 servicing of the Judicial Proceedings 29 Annex I 52 The Hague sub-office 29 significant fundraising and diplomatic Legal Unit 29 meetings held during the reporting period 52 Witness and Victims support 30 Personnel 30 Annex II 54 Interns and seconded Personnel 31 significant presentations of the special court’s Court Management 32 Jurisprudence 54 Office of the Principle Defender (Defence office) 32 Annex III 57 completion strategy organograms
    [Show full text]
  • Special Court for Sierra Leone in The
    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before : Justice George Gelaga King, Presiding Judge Justice Emmanuel Ayoola Justice Renate Winter Justice Raja Fernando Justice Jon M. Kamanda Registrar : Herman von Hebel Date : 22 February 2008 PROSECUTOR Against ALEX TAMBA BRIMA BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA SANTIGIE BORBOR KANU (Case No. SCSL-2004-16-A) JUDGMENT Office of the Prosecutor : Defence Counsel for Alex Tamba Brima: Dr. Christopher Staker Kojo Graham Mr. Karim Agha Mr. Chile Eboe-Osuji Ms. Anne Althaus Defence Counsel for Brima Bazzy Kamara : Andrew Daniels Defence Counsel for Santigie Borbor Kanu : Ajibola E. Manly-Spain Silas Chekera CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................5 A. THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE .....................................................................................5 B. THE ARMED CONFLICT IN SIERRA LEONE ....................................................................................6 C. THE TRIAL PROCEEDINGS .............................................................................................................8 1. The Indictment.........................................................................................................................8 2. The Accused...........................................................................................................................10 3. Judgment................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone: Guilty Verdicts Not the End of the Story for Victims of War Crimes
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE Sierra Leone: Guilty verdicts not the end of the story for victims of war crimes Amnesty International said that today's guilty verdicts by the Special Court for Sierra Leone against three senior members of Sierra Leone's feared Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC) -- while a positive step -- should not be the closing chapter in the struggle to achieve justice for the terrible crimes committed against the people of that country during the 11 years of violent conflict. The organization based its comments on preliminary reports of the verdicts, which have not yet been published. Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamara and Santigie Borbor Kanu, all senior commanders of the AFRC, were convicted of crimes against humanity and war crimes committed in a non-international armed conflict, including unlawful killings, extermination, rape, acts of terrorism, collective punishment, and mutilation. They were acquitted of sexual slavery and other inhumane acts. "These verdicts send a positive signal to the people of Sierra Leone that someone will be held responsible for the brutal crimes perpetrated against them and members of their families -- but there are many others who carried out terrible acts during the country's 11 years of conflict," said Hugo Relva, Amnesty International Legal Adviser. "Thousands of others can and must be held criminally responsible. Reparations must also be provided to the victims in order for justice to begin to prevail throughout Sierra Leone." Remarkably, today's decision by the Special Court marks the first time in history that individuals have been convicted of war crimes for conscripting and enlisting children under the age of fifteen into armed forces or groups and using them to participate actively in hostilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Special Court for Sierra Leone Case No. Scsl
    THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE CASE NO. SCSL – 2004-16-PT The PROSECUTOR Against ALEX TAMBA BRIMA also known as TAMBA ALEX BRIMA also known as GULLIT BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA also known as IBRAHIM BAZZY KAMARA also known as ALHAJI IBRAHIM KAMARA AND SANTIGIE BORBOR KANU also known as 55 also known as FIVE- FIVE also known as SANTIGIE KHANU also known as SANTIGIE KANU also known as S. B. KHANU also known as S.B. KANU also known as SANTIGIE BOBSON KANU also known as BORBOR SANTIGIE KANU INDICTMENT The Prosecutor, Special Court for Sierra Leone, under Article 15 of the Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (the Statute) charges: ALEX TAMBA BRIMA also known as (aka) TAMBA ALEX BRIMA aka GULLIT BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA aka IBRAHIM BAZZY KAMARA aka ALHAJI IBRAHIM KAMARA and SANTIGIE BORBOR KANU aka 55 aka FIVE-FIVE aka SANTIGIE KHANU aka SANTIGIE KANU aka S. B. KHANU aka S.B. KANU aka SANTIGIE BOBSON KANU aka BORBOR SANTIGIE KANU with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 3 COMMON TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS AND OF ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL II and OTHER SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW, in violation of Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Statute as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. ALEX TAMBA BRIMA aka TAMBA ALEX BRIMA aka GULLIT was born 23 November 1971 at Yaryah Village, Kono District, Republic of Sierra Leone. 40 part i 2. He joined the Sierra Leone Army (SLA) in April 1985 and rose to the rank of Stafff Sergeant. 3. BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA aka IBRAHIM BAZZY KAMARA aka ALHAJI IBRAHIM KAMARA was born on 7 May 1968 at Wilberforce Village in the Western Area in the Republic of Sierra Leone.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Fifty-Ninth Session Sixtieth Year Agenda Item 108 Programme Budget for the Biennium 2004-2005
    United Nations A/59/816–S/2005/350 General Assembly Distr.: General Security Council 27 May 2005 Original: English General Assembly Security Council Fifty-ninth session Sixtieth year Agenda item 108 Programme budget for the biennium 2004-2005 Identical letters dated 26 May 2005 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the General Assembly and the President of the Security Council I have the honour to refer to General Assembly resolution 58/284 of 8 April 2004 in which the Assembly requested the Secretary-General to invite the Special Court for Sierra Leone to adopt a completion strategy and also requested the Secretary-General to inform both the Security Council and the General Assembly at its fifty-ninth session about this matter. In accordance with the above-mentioned resolution I am pleased to forward the final completion strategy, which has been prepared by the Special Court and endorsed by the Management Committee of the Court which is responsible for advising me on the non-judicial aspects of the Court’s work (see annex). (Signed) Kofi A. Annan 05-36432 (E) 200605 *0536432* A/59/816 S/2005/350 Annex Special Court for Sierra Leone Completion strategy (18 May 2005) Page I. Introduction .................................................................... 3 II. Activities to date ................................................................ 4 A. Judicial and institutional activities ............................................. 4 B. Administrative and support activities ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Case Study Report on Prevention in Sierra Leone Here
    International Center for Transitional Justice Leaving Behind the Worst of the Past TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND PREVENTION IN SIERRA LEONE June 2021 Cover Image: A man calls the residents of Karina, a village in the Biriwa Limba Chiefdom in Sierra Leone’s Northern province, to attend an outreach meeting of the Special Court for Sierra Leone on behalf of the para- mount chief. (Special Court for Sierra Leone) Leaving Behind the Worst of the Past TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND PREVENTION IN SIERRA LEONE Ibrahim Bangura JUNE 2021 International Center Leaving Behind the Worst of the Past for Transitional Justice About the Research Project This publication is part of an ICTJ comparative research project examining the contributions of tran- sitional justice to prevention. The project includes country case studies on Colombia, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, and Sierra Leone, as well as a summary report. All six publications are available on ICTJ’s website. About the Author Ibrahim Bangura lectures at the Peace and Conflict Studies Programme at the University of Sierra Leone’s Fourah Bay College and is a senior partner at Transition International, a consultancy firm based in the Netherlands. He has worked extensively in the fields of transitional justice; disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration of ex-combatants; security sector reform; sustainable livelihoods; gender justice; and conflict resolution in Africa. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science and History and a master’s degree in Gender Studies from the University of Sierra Leone, a master’s degree in International Development Studies from the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, and a doctorate degree in Economics from the Leipzig Graduate School of Management in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • ("":S"I"I - 1..,$2.1.1-) •
    312 Sc.S"" _ O\t-- '''' • T ("":S"I"I - 1..,$2.1.1-) • SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR FREETOWN - SIERRA LEONE TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Justice Teresa Doherty, Presiding Judge Justice Richard Brunt Lussick Justice Julia Sebutinde Registrar: Mr. Robin Vincent Date filed: 12 August 2005 THE PROSECUTOR Against ALEX TAMBA BRIMA BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA SANTIGIE BORBOR KANU Case No. SCSL - 2004 - 16 - T PROSECUTION FILING OF ADDITIONAL WITNESS STATEMENT PURSUANT TO DECISION ON PROSECUTION REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO CALL AN ADDITIONAL WITNESS PURSUANT TO RULE 73bisE Office of the Prosecutor Defence Counsel for Alex Tamba Brima Luc Cote Kojo Graham Lesley Taylor Glenna Thompson Defence Counsel for Brima Bazzy Kamara Andrew Daniels Pa Momo Fofanah Defence Counsel for Santigie Borbor Kanu: Geert-Jan Alexander Knoops Carry J. Knoops A.E. Manly-Spain SCSL-04-16-T SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR FREETOWN - SIERRA LEONE THE PROSECUTOR Against ALEX TAMBA BRIMA BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA SANTIGIE BORBOR KANU Case No. SCSL - 2004 -16 -T PROSECUTION FILING OF ADDITIONAL WITNESS STATEMENT PURSUANT TO DECISION ON PROSECUTION REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO CALL AN ADDITIONAL WITNESS PURSUANT TO RULE 73bisE I. On 6 July 2005, the Prosecution filed its "Prosecution Request for Leave to Call an Additional Witness Pursuant to Rule 73bisE". On 5 August 2005, the Trial Chamber issued its "Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Call an Additional Witness Pursuant to Rule 73bisE" ("the Decision"), where the Trial Chamber granted leave to the Prosecution to add John Petrie to the witness list and ordered the Prosecution to disclose to the Defence and file with the Trial Chamber, the statement ofJohn Petrie, not later than 12 August 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Court for Sierra Leone “Bringing Justice and Ensuring Lasting Peace” Some Reflections on the Trial Phase at the Special Court for Sierra Leone
    SECOND INTERIM REPORT ON THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE “BRINGING JUSTICE AND ENSURING LASTING PEACE” SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE TRIAL PHASE AT THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE U.C. BERKELEY WAR CRIMES STUDIES CENTER APRIL 2006 Sierra Leone's national courthouse and the historic Cotton Tree, Freetown, Sierra Leone This publication was originally produced pursuant to a project supported by the War Crimes Studies Center (WCSC), which was founded at the University of California, Berkeley in 2000. In 2014, the WCSC re-located to Stanford University and adopted a new name: the WSD Handa Center for Human Rights and International Justice. The Handa Center succeeds and carries on all the work of the WCSC, including all trial monitoring programs, as well as partnerships such as the Asian International Justice Initiative (AIJI). A complete archive of trial monitoring reports is available online at: http://handacenter.stanford.edu/reports-list For more information about Handa Center programs, please visit: http://handacenter.stanford.edu SECOND INTERIM REPORT ON THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE “BRINGING JUSTICE AND ENSURING LASTING PEACE”: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE TRIAL PHASE AT THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE 30 March 2006 By Michelle Staggs 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. REPORT OBJECTIVES 4 3. TRIAL CHAMBER I: UNDER THE SWAY OF THE INDICTMENT 5 3.1 Trial Timetable 6 3.2 Trial Management 6 3.3 Approach of the Chamber: Indictment-oriented 7 3.4 Brief Overview of the CDF and RUF trials 10 3.5 The CDF Trial: Politics, Religion and the Trial Process 11 3.6 Brief Overview of the Prosecution’s Case in the CDF trial 12 4.
    [Show full text]
  • HJJ 2008-2 ENG 04.Indd
    This article from Hague Justice Journal is published by Eleven international publishing and made available to anonieme bezoeker COMMENTARY The Special Court for Sierra Leone’s Appeals Judgment in the AFRC case Roland Adjovi* The civil war in Sierra Leone (1991-2002) was initially a confl ict between the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebel forces under Foday Sankoh, and the central government. In 1997, the advance of the rebels led to the establishment of the Civil Defence Forces (CDF), which benefi ted from the support of the Sierra Leonean government, seemingly to the detriment of Sierra Leone’s army. Although the country was still unstable, elections took place and in March 1996, Ahmed Tejan Kabbah was elected president. Beginning in September 1996, Kabbah was subjected to an attempted military coup led by retired offi cer Johnny Paul Koroma, who was subsequently imprisoned. On 25 May 1997, members of Sierra Leone’s army staged a successful coup and installed Koroma as the Head of State, along with his military regime, the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC). One of the major political moves of this regime was to involve the RUF in the management of the country, integrating the RUF into the government and establishing a Supreme Council. The three accused in this case, all relatively young offi cers born between 1965 and 1971, played key roles in the government of Sierra Leone. Alex Tamba Brima, one of the offi cers who participated in the coup, had the rank of Principal Liaison Offi cer and was a member of the Supreme Council with responsibility for several ministries.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPECIAL COURT for SIERRA LEONE CASE NO. SCSL-03-10-I the PROSECUTOR Against BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA Also Known As IBRAHIM BAZZY K
    THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE CASE NO. SCSL-03-10-I THE PROSECUTOR Against BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA also known as IBRAHIM BAZZY KAMARA also known as ALHAJI IBRAHIM KAMARA INDICTMENT The Prosecutor, Special Court for Sierra Leone, under Article 15 of the Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (the Statute) charges: BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA also known as (aka) IBRAHIM BAZZY KAMARA aka ALHAJI IBRAHIM KAMARA with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 3 COMMON TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS AND OF ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL II and OTHER SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW, in violation of Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Statute as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA aka IBRAHIM BAZZY KAMARA aka ALHAJI IBRAHIM KAMARA (the ACCUSED) was born on 7 May 1968 at Wilberforce Village in the Western Area in the Republic of Sierra Leone. 2. The ACCUSED joined the Sierra Leone Army (SLA) on 20 May 1991 and rose to the rank of Stafff Sergeant. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 3. At all times relevant to this Indictment, a state of armed conflict existed within Sierra Leone. For the purposes of this Indictment, organized armed fac- tions involved in this conflict included the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), the Civil Defence Forces (CDF) and the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC). 4. A nexus existed between the armed conflict and all acts or omissions charged herein as Violations of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Addi- tional Protocol II and as Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. 16 part i 5.
    [Show full text]