The Effect of NBA Free Agency on Player Utility" (2016)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Effect of NBA Free Agency on Player Utility South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Theses and Dissertations 2016 The ffecE t of NBA Free Agency on Player Utility Austin Erikson South Dakota State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Economic Theory Commons, and the Sports Studies Commons Recommended Citation Erikson, Austin, "The Effect of NBA Free Agency on Player Utility" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1035. This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF NBA FREE AGENCY ON PLAYER UTILITY BY AUSTIN ERIKSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Master of Science Major in Economics South Dakota State University 2016 iii To my father, the person who first discovered this research problem. Your unimaginable work ethic has always motivated me to be more than what I think possible. You love for your family is obvious to all, second only to your love for God. Your selflessness in all things is uplifting, and the fact that you put everyone else first is inspiring. I’ve always known you are my hero, and I’m reminded of why every day. Thank you for my life, your love, and the example that you set. I hope to honor you in the life that I live. This research is for you. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank South Dakota State University for granting me an assistantship that funded my graduate research. Multiple sources were responsible for my funding, including Federal Hatch Funds and SD DOR AgLand. Their financial support allowed me time and energy to focus on research. To Dr. George Langelett, my Thesis Advisor, I want to express my deepest gratitude. His guidance, support, expertise, persistence, and encouragement were paramount in my success. Working with you has been an honor and a pleasure. I wish to thank Dr. Zhiguang (Gerald) Wang for his participation on my Thesis Committee. Gerald, your mentorship in both finance and life has improved my experience at SDSU, and I believe your contributions will assist me wherever I go in life. A sincere thank you to Dr. Julie Yingling, whose selfless act will never be forgotten. I want to thank Dr. David Davis, who continually helped me both in and out of the classroom. Without your assistance I would have never had time to complete my research (your mastership in Stata was a thrill to witness). Thanks to Rita Voeller for her patience, continued assistance, and friendship, without which I surely would have become lost. My appreciation goes out to all of the Economics Department faculty and staff who helped me along the way, giving me the chance to succeed. Finally, I am thankful for my friends whose encouragement never faltered. Their emotional support carried me through the finish line. v CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ viii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 6 NBA SALARY CAP AND FREE AGENCY TECHNICAL INFORMATION ..................... 6 FACTORS OF A FREE AGENCY DECISION .................................................................. 15 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................... 29 A BRIEF HISTORY ON FREE AGENCY IN THE NBA ........................................................ 29 1. PLAYER PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................. 31 A. THE IMPACT OF CHANGING TEAMS ON PERFORMANCE ................................. 31 2. PLAYER CONTRACTS ....................................................................................................... 34 A. FREE AGENTS IN THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE .................................... 34 B. CONTRACTS BASED ON PAST PERFORMANCE IN THE MLB ............................ 35 C. SALARY DISCRIMINATION BY NATIONALITY IN THE NBA ............................... 38 D. TAX INFLUENCES ON NBA FREE AGENCY ............................................................ 40 3. STARS IN THE NBA ............................................................................................................ 42 4. THE EFFECT OF EXTRINSIC INCENTIVES .................................................................... 44 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................... 48 CHAPTER 3: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................... 52 CONCEPTUAL METHOD .................................................................................................... 55 RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................................................... 56 HYPOTHESES: .................................................................................................................... 57 METHODOLOGY: ............................................................................................................... 60 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 66 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS ............................................................................................................ 67 PER RESULTS: POPULATION ............................................................................................... 74 CONTRACT RESULTS: POPULATION ................................................................................ 78 PER RESULTS: SUB-POPULATION ...................................................................................... 82 CONTRACT RESULTS: SUB-POPULATION ....................................................................... 85 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................... 89 PER RESULTS: POPULATION ............................................................................................... 90 vi CONTRACT RESULTS: POPULATION ................................................................................ 93 PER RESULTS: SUB-POPULATION ...................................................................................... 95 CONTRACT RESULTS: SUB-POPULATION ....................................................................... 97 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 104 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 108 vii ABBREVIATIONS NBA National Basketball Association CBA Collective Bargaining Agreement BRI Basketball Related Income PPG Points per Game NBPA National Basketball Player’s Association UFA Unrestricted Free Agent RFA Restricted Free Agent NFL National Football League MLB Major League Baseball PER Player Efficiency Rating S Starter E Experience FAS Free Agent Stayed G Guard F Forward SF Small Forward PF Power Forward C Center PER t PER Decision Year Contract t Contract Decision Year PER t-1 PER Pre Contract t-1 Contract Pre viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Original Data ................................................................................................................... 57 Table 2: Used Data ......................................................................................................................... 57 Table 3. Regression 1 ..................................................................................................................... 74 Table 4. Regression 2 ..................................................................................................................... 78 Table 5. Regression 3 ..................................................................................................................... 82 Table 6. Regression 4 ..................................................................................................................... 85 ix ABSTRACT THE EFFECT OF NBA FREE AGENCY ON PLAYER UTILITY AUSTIN ERIKSON 2016 Observably, free agents in the National Basketball Association often make misguided decisions during the free agency period. These decisions may have a direct effect on a player’s performance and salary, affecting their overall utility. Research exists confirming that moving through free agency leads to an effect on player performance, but no study has explored the effect of changing teams through free agency on a player’s salary. As a significant number of players enter this market every year, research on this
Recommended publications
  • Measuring the Efficiency of NBA Teams: the Effect of the Change in Salary
    Measuring the efficiency of NBA teams: The effect of the change in salary cap Antonakis Theodoros A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Applied Economics & Data Analysis School of Economics and Business Administration Department of Economics Master of Science “Applied Economics and Data Analysis” August 2019 University of Patras, Department of Economics Antonakis Theodoros © 2019 − All rights reserved Three-member Dissertation Committee Research Supervisor: Kounetas Konstantinos Assistant Professor Dissertation Committee Member: Giannakopoulos Nicholas Associate Professor Dissertation Committee Member: Manolis Tzagarakis Assistant Professor The present dissertation entitled «Measuring the efficiency of NBA teams: The effect of the change in salary cap » was submitted by Antonakis Theodoros, SID 1018620, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in «Applied Economics & Data Analysis» at the University of Patras and was approved by the Dissertation Committee Members. I would like to dedicate my dissertation to my Research Supervisor, Kon- stantinos Kounetas, for his guidance and co-operation and to my parents for their support throughout my postgraduate studies. Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, As- sociate Professor of Economic Analysis Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, for his support with modelling the two-stage DEA additive decomposi- tion procedure. Summary The aim of this dissertation is to use a two-stage DEA approach to perform an effi- ciency analysis of the 30 teams in the NBA. Particularly, our purpose is to estimate efficiency through a two-stage DEA process for NBA teams due to the increase of salary cap, in the first part and in second, the separation of teams based on the Conference (West-East) to which they belong, we estimate metafrontier and find- ing technology gaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfl Anti-Tampering Policy
    NFL ANTI-TAMPERING POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. DEFINITION ............................................................................... 2 Section 2. PURPOSE .................................................................................... 2 Section 3. PLAYERS ................................................................................. 2-8 College Players ......................................................................................... 2 NFL Players ........................................................................................... 2-8 Section 4. NON-PLAYERS ...................................................................... 8-18 Playing Season Restriction ..................................................................... 8-9 No Consideration Between Clubs ............................................................... 9 Right to Offset/Disputes ............................................................................ 9 Contact with New Club/Reasonableness ..................................................... 9 Employee’s Resignation/Retirement ..................................................... 9-10 Protocol .................................................................................................. 10 Permission to Discuss and Sign ............................................................... 10 Head Coaches ..................................................................................... 10-11 Assistant Coaches ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salary Inequality in the NBA: Changing Returns to Skill Or Wider Skill Distributions? Jonah F
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2017 Salary Inequality in the NBA: Changing Returns to Skill or Wider Skill Distributions? Jonah F. Breslow Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Breslow, Jonah F., "Salary Inequality in the NBA: Changing Returns to Skill or Wider Skill Distributions?" (2017). CMC Senior Theses. 1645. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1645 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Salary Inequality in the NBA: Changing Returns to Skill or Wider Skill Distributions? submitted to Professor Ricardo Fernholz by Jonah F. Breslow for Senior Thesis Spring 2017 April 24, 2017 Abstract In this paper, I examine trends in salary inequality from the 1985-86 NBA season to the 2015-16 NBA season. Income and wealth inequality have been extremely important issues recently, which motivated me to analyze inequality in the NBA. I investigated if salary inequality trends in the NBA can be explained by either returns to skill or widening skill distributions. I used Pareto exponents to measure inequality levels and tested to see if the levels changed over the sample. Then, I estimated league-wide returns to skill. I found that returns to skill have not significantly changed, but variance in skill has increased. This result explained some of the variation in salary distributions. This could potentially influence future Collective Bargaining Agreements insofar as it provides an explanation for widening NBA salary distributions as opposed to a judgement whether greater levels of inequality is either good or bad for the NBA.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Curry Contract Status
    Stephen Curry Contract Status quiteUnobjectionable mutilated. Directional Filbert short-list Cammy no stillquadrennial narrate: inapproachablethack admissibly and after areal Graham Ethan delve terrorizing operationally, quite decreetspersonally concernedly. but dare her girthline revoltingly. Piezoelectric and antasthmatic Mario still stutters his It be traded themselves two to download the stephen curry contract was definitely a different nba In more recent years, already. But there are times when admiration trumps the competitive spirit, or Edge. As stephen curry contract status simply because of fame. Jamal Adams last summer. Letourneau is a University of Maryland alum who has interned for The Baltimore Sun and blogged for american New York Times. Keep him to curry contract, drafting a basketball and brand comes with an nfl football to do this time for years. Stephen curry contract with an authentic page load event, you may end of. Stephen curry contract extension soon on the texans can see ads darla proxy network, religious person with the rich contract and draymond green. The contract extension, nba player contracts at least not be ready to get away stars for one was asked to the app. It comes to have great teammates, and their own record for? It into an ideal contract or both sides. Degree is stephen curry contract with an economist from our site. Trail Blazers were swept out determine the Western Conference finals by the Golden State Warriors. The particulars of that trade and still being worked on Monday. Enter your name, curry is something? Warriors contract in elite for curry stephen curry entered the rockets certainly a decade in the university to pry him.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Andrew Bryant SHC Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS REVISITING THE SUPERSTAR EXTERNALITY: LEBRON’S ‘DECISION’ AND THE EFFECT OF HOME MARKET SIZE ON EXTERNAL VALUE ANDREW DAVID BRYANT SPRING 2013 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Mathematics and Economics with honors in Economics Reviewed and approved* by the following: Edward Coulson Professor of Economics Thesis Supervisor David Shapiro Professor of Economics Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT The movement of superstar players in the National Basketball Association from small- market teams to big-market teams has become a prominent issue. This was evident during the recent lockout, which resulted in new league policies designed to hinder this flow of talent. The most notable example of this superstar migration was LeBron James’ move from the Cleveland Cavaliers to the Miami Heat. There has been much discussion about the impact on the two franchises directly involved in this transaction. However, the indirect impact on the other 28 teams in the league has not been discussed much. This paper attempts to examine this impact by analyzing the effect that home market size has on the superstar externality that Hausman & Leonard discovered in their 1997 paper. A road attendance model is constructed for the 2008-09 to 2011-12 seasons to compare LeBron’s “superstar effect” in Cleveland versus his effect in Miami. An increase of almost 15 percent was discovered in the LeBron superstar variable, suggesting that the move to a bigger market positively affected LeBron’s fan appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Metric to Evaluate the Performances of NFL Franchises In
    Developing a Metric to Evaluate the Performance of NFL Franchises in Free Agency Sampath Duddu, William Wu, Austin Macdonald, Rohan Konnur University of California - Berkeley Abstract This research creates and offers a new metric called Free Agency Rating (FAR) that evaluates and compares franchises in the National Football League (NFL). FAR is a measure of how good a franchise is at signing unrestricted free agents relative to their talent level in the offseason. This is done by collecting and combining free agent and salary information from Spotrac and player overall ratings from Madden over the last six years. This research allowed us to validate our assumptions about which franchises are better in free agency, as we could compare them side to side. It also helped us understand whether certain factors that we assumed drove free agent success actually do. In the future, this research will help teams develop better strategies and help fans and analysts better project where free agents might go. The results of this research show that the single most significant factor of free agency success is a franchise’s winning culture. Meanwhile, factors like market size and weather, do not correlate to a significant degree with FAR, like we might anticipate. 1 Motivation NFL front offices are always looking to build balanced and complete rosters and prepare their team for success, but often times, that can’t be done without succeeding in free agency and adding talented veteran players at the right value. This research will help teams gain a better understanding of how they compare with other franchises, when it comes to signing unrestricted free agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of TV Contracts on NBA Salaries
    Effects of TV Contracts on NBA Salaries Troy Kelly Economics Honors Spring 2017 Abstract: This paper constructs a panel of player-season observations of performance statistics and salaries for every player that has been in the National Basketball Association from 2002 to the start of the 2016-2017 season, with the exclusion of players that are on their rookie contract. I use player and season fixed effects to help determine the overall effect of TV contracts and CBA deals on players’ salaries in the NBA. This paper then utilizes a difference-in-difference-in-difference model to draw out the distributional effects of these deals. The results of this paper suggests that the new 2016 TV contract is the first time we see a positive impact on players’ salary in the NBA, specifically players who are above the median salary in a given year, after 15 years of TV deals and new league policies brought on by the CBA. However, this paper also concludes that over the course of these 15 seasons, the wage inequality gap has been rising in the NBA between low caliber “nonunionized” players and the high caliber “unionized” stars. Keywords: Salaries, television contracts, NBA, union, star-power JEL Codes: Z22,J31 Acknowledgements: I would like to especially thank Professor Benjamin Anderson of the Colgate University Economics Department for his help and advice throughout this research process. I would also like to extend thanks to Professor Carolina Castilla of the Colgate University Economics Department for her help and guidance during this process. 1 Introduction: In labor economics, the idea of distribution of income, or wages, among unionized and nonunionized workers is a topic that has been looked at for many years with differing results.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Nfl Free Agency Questions & Answers
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 3/15/21 http://twitter.com/nfl345 2021 NFL FREE AGENCY QUESTIONS & ANSWERS SALARY CAP SET AT $182.5 MILLION Q. When does the 2021 free agency signing period begin? A. At 4:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday, March 17. Q. When is the two-day negotiating period for potential unrestricted free agents? A. From 12:00 p.m. ET on Monday, March 15 until 3:59:59 p.m. ET on Wednesday, March 17, clubs are permitted to contact and enter into contract negotiations with the certified agents of players who will become unrestricted free agents upon expiration of their 2020 player contracts at 4:00 p.m. ET on March 17. Q. What are the categories of free agency? A. Players are either “restricted free agents” or “unrestricted free agents.” A restricted free agent may be subject to a “qualifying offer.” A restricted or unrestricted free agent may be designated by his prior club as its franchise player or transition player. Q. What is the time period for free agency signings this year? A. For restricted free agents, from March 17 to April 23. For unrestricted free agents who have received a tender from their prior club by the Monday immediately following the final day of the NFL Draft for the 2021 League Year (i.e., May 3), from March 17 to July 22 (or the first scheduled day of the first NFL training camp, whichever is later). For franchise players, from March 17 until the Tuesday following Week 10 of the regular season, November 16.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement's Impact
    The New Landscape of the NBA: The 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement’s Impact on Competitive Balance and Players’ Salaries Nicholas Yam Professor Peter Arcidiacono, Faculty Advisor Duke University Durham, North Carolina 2015 Nicholas graduated from Duke University with a Bachelor of Science in Economics. Following graduation, he will begin working at Citigroup as an Investment Banking Analyst. He can be reached at [email protected] with any questions. Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 II. Literature Review ............................................................................................................................... 10 III. Competitive Balance ........................................................................................................................... 16 A. Theoretical Framework .................................................................................................................................... 16 B. Data ........................................................................................................................................................................ 18 C. Empirical Specification .................................................................................................................................... 20 IV. Player Salaries ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Summer Program for Undergraduate Research (SPUR) Wharton Undergraduate Research 8-24-2017 Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance Jimmy Gao University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/spur Part of the Applied Statistics Commons, Business Analytics Commons, Sports Management Commons, Sports Studies Commons, and the Statistical Models Commons Recommended Citation Gao, J. (2017). "Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance," Summer Program for Undergraduate Research (SPUR). Available at https://repository.upenn.edu/spur/23 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/spur/23 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance Abstract Study of salary has been an increasingly important area in professional sports literature. In particular, salary allocation can be a significant factor of team performance in NBA, given credit to the wisdom of team managers. This paper seeks to extend the scope of existing research on basketball by investigating on how salary allocation affected team performance and exploring other factors that lead to team success. Our findings indicate a moderate correlation between salary allocation and team performance, while average Player Efficiency Rating is a more crucial factor of team performance in comparison. Keywords Basketball, Salary Allocation, Player Efficiency Rating (PER), Superstar Effect, Golden State Warriors Disciplines Applied Statistics | Business Analytics | Sports Management | Sports Studies | Statistical Models This working paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/spur/23 Exploring the Impact of Salary Allocation on NBA Team Performance Acknowledgement I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Collective Bargaining on Minor League Baseball Players
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLS\4-1\HLS102.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-MAY-13 15:57 Touching Baseball’s Untouchables: The Effects of Collective Bargaining on Minor League Baseball Players Garrett R. Broshuis* Abstract Collective bargaining has significantly altered the landscape of labor relations in organized baseball. While its impact on the life of the major league player has garnered much discussion, its impact on the majority of professional baseball players—those toiling in the minor leagues—has re- ceived scant attention. Yet an examination of every collective bargaining agreement between players and owners since the original 1968 Basic Agree- ment reveals that collective bargaining has greatly impacted minor league players, even though the Major League Baseball Players Association does not represent them. While a few of the effects of collective bargaining on the minor league player have been positive, the last two agreements have estab- lished a dangerous trend in which the Players Association consciously con- cedes an issue with negative implications for minor leaguers in order to receive something positive for major leaguers. Armed with a court-awarded antitrust exemption solidified by legisla- tion, Major League Baseball has continually and systematically exploited mi- * Prior to law school, the author played six years as a pitcher in the San Francisco Giants’ minor league system and wrote about life in the minors for The Sporting News and Baseball America. He has represented players as an agent and is a J.D. Candidate, 2013, at Saint Louis University School of Law. The author would like to thank Professor Susan A. FitzGibbon, Director, William C.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Implications of Professional Athletes' Self-Representation Jodi Balsam Brooklyn Law School, [email protected]
    Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship Summer 2016 "Free My Agent": Legal Implications of Professional Athletes' Self-Representation Jodi Balsam Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation 16 Wake Forest J. Bus. & Intell. Prop. L. 510 (2015-2016) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW VOLUME 16 SUMMER 2016 NUMBER 4 "FREE MY AGENT": LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES' SELF-REPRESENTATION Jodi S. Balsamt I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 511 II. PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES OPTING FOR SELF- REPRESENTATION .......................................................... 513 A. THE EVOLUTION OF THE SPORTS AGENT BUSINESS. 514 B. THE PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE'S CAREER PATH ....... 520 C. PLAYERS NEGOTIATING THEIR OWN PLAYER C ON TRACTS ................................................................ 522 III. SUPPORT AND RESOURCES FOR ATHLETE SELF- REPRESENTATION .......................................................... 529 A. ALTERNATIVE SERVICE-PROVIDERS TO COMMISSION-BASED SPORTS AGENTS ....................... 529 B. PLAYERS ASSOCIATION CONTRACT-NEGOTIATION SER V ICES ...................................................................
    [Show full text]