Ultrafast Electron Dynamics in Thiolate-Protected Plasmonic Gold
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ultrafast Electron Dynamics in Thiolate-Protected Plasmonic Gold Clusters: Size and Ligand Effect aMasoud Shabaninezhad, bAbubkr Abuhagr, cNaga Arjun Sakthivel, cChanaka Kumara, cAmala Dass*, dKyuju Kwak, dKyunglim Pyo, dDongil Lee* and bGuda Ramakrishna* aDepartment of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, United States bDepartment of Chemistry, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, United States cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, United States dDepartment of Chemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, South Korea Abstract The influence of passivating ligand on electron-phonon relaxation dynamics of the smallest sized gold clusters was studied using ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy and theoretical modeling. The electron dynamics in Au279, Au329, and Au329 passivated with 4-tert-butylbenzene thiol (TBBT), phe- nylethane thiol (SC2Ph) and hexane thiol (SC6), respectively, were investigated. These clusters were chosen as they are the smallest gold clusters reported till-date to show plasmonic behavior. Ultrafast transient absorption measurements were also carried out on Au~1400 (SC6) and Au~2000 (SC6) to under- stand the influence of the size on electron-phonon relaxation with the same passivating ligand. The study has revealed interesting aspects on the role of ligand on electron-phonon relaxation dynamics 1 wherein the aromatic passivating ligands, SC2Ph and TBBT, have shown smaller power dependence and higher plasmon bleach indicating dampened plasmon resonance while the cluster with aliphatic passiv- ating ligand has behaved similarly to regular plasmonic gold nanoparticles. To model the effect of the ligand on the plasmonic properties of the investigated samples , free electron density correction factor of each one was calculated using three-layered Mie theory, and the results show that SC6 interacts least with core-gold while TBBT and SC2Ph have a greater effect on the surface electronic conductivity that is attributed to -interaction of the ligand with gold. The results also shed light on unusual electron- phonon relaxation and smaller slope observed for Au329 (SC2Ph) that is ascribed to surface gold- inter- action creating a hybrid state. In contrast, extended -interaction is probably the reason for plasmonic nature observed in Au279 (TBBT) even though its size is smaller when compared to Au329. In addition, the results also have shown that the electron-phonon coupling has increased with an increase in the size of the cluster and theoretical modeling has shown higher electron conductivity for larger plasmonic gold clusters. 1. Introduction Optical properties of noble metal nanoparticles have been the subject of widespread research inter- est for the past two decades.1–4 The coupling of the electromagnetic field to free electrons in metal na- noparticles creates quasi-particles named surface plasmons and was the focus of research for both theo- reticians and experimentalists alike.5 The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of metal nanoparticles (NPs) strongly depend on the density of electrons, shape, type, size, the composition of the nanoparti- cles, the polarization direction of the incident light as well as the chemical environment that surrounds them.5–16 Among metallic nanoparticles, gold NPs have attracted significant interest owing to their high chemical and physical stability, biocompatibility, photo-stability and large optical cross sections.17–19 The SPR of gold NPs found applications in manifold or areas20 that included optical sensing,21,22 biolog- 2 ical imaging,23–25 plasmonic photo-thermal therapy,4 molecular diagnostics,2,24,26 surface-enhanced Ra- man spectroscopy,2 metal-enhanced luminescence and plasmonic rulers.3 Enormous research has focused on the plasmonic properties of Au NPs and significant break- throughs were made in the field.2,3,11,14,17,19,24–31 However, a bulk of the surface plasmon research has focused on gold nanoparticles passivated with surfactants or gold nanomaterials in different matrices.27,32–38 The SPR properties seem to be influenced by the chemical environment around the NPs and can be greatly altered if the surface of the gold nanoparticles is chemically bound to ligands.27,32–35 The ligands that are chemically bound to Au NPs prevent coalescence of the NPs by counterbalancing the van der Waals attractive forces.39–41 Coupling NPs with chemical ligands potentially reduce the elec- tron density of the conduction electrons and thereby altering the effective optical refractive index at the near field of the NPs.40–42 A remarkable work was carried out by Peng et. al41 on the plasmon absorption spectrum of spherical silver (Ag) NPs with diameters in the range of 2 to 20 nm. They observed an in- teresting trend where the absorption peak of the ligand-conjugated Ag NPs shifted to higher energies when the size was decreased from 20 nm to 12 nm, while the absorption peak shifted to longer wave- lengths with the further reduction of the size. This unusual trend was assigned to the ligand effect on SPR absorption. Although significant progress was made on gold nanoparticles of varying sizes and shapes, corre- sponding research on ligand-protected plasmonic gold NPs such as thiolated gold nanoparticles was rather limited.3,4,14,15,19,24–26,43,44 In recent years, thiolate-protected gold clusters have received enormous research attention as the clusters with sizes less than 2 nm seem to show interesting quantum size behav- ior and excitonic properties.27,28,30,31,45–47 The advent of modern synthetic and characterization tech- niques has made the science of atomically precise thiolate-protected gold clusters interesting for theore- ticians and experimentalists. Even thiolate protected gold clusters show plasmonic properties and Au329 protected with hexane thiol was found to be the smallest aliphatic thiolate protected plasmonic Au 3 48–50 NPs. The composition of 76.3 kDa aliphatic or aliphatic-like (SC2Ph) thiolate-protected gold cluster has been found to be Au329(SR)84 (where SR is the thiolate ligand) by employing SC2Ph, SC6 and SC12 + 51 ligands with and without Cs adducts. A closely related composition of Au333(SR)79 has been reported for the 76.3 kDa cluster based on Cs+ adduct peaks and it remains to be addressed.49,52 Recently, hexane thiolate protected Au~1400 and Au~2000, two new sizes in aliphatic thiolate protected plasmonic Au NPs of size ~3.6 nm and ~3.8 nm, respectively, have been reported.53,54 One common way to study plasmons in metal nanoparticles is via the use of ultrafast transient spec- troscopy and corresponding pump-power dependence that yields information of electron dynamics.29,43,52,55–62 Comprehensive understanding of the relaxation processes of metal nanoparticles yielded valuable information that was useful for applications like exciton-plasmon energy transfer and optical switching56–61 Link and El-Sayed investigated pump-power, size and shape effects on electron- phonon (e-p) relaxation dynamics in gold and silver nanospheres and nanorods in size range from 10 to 100 nm.43 The studies demonstrated that e-p relaxation dynamics was independent of the size and shape of NPs.43 Similarly, Hodak and coworkers reported a size independent electron-phonon coupling in Au nanoparticles in the 2.5 to 8 nm range in aqueous solution.56 Link et al. embedded 14.5 nm and 12.1 nm Au NPs in MgSO powder and solution to test the effect of the surrounding medium on the recovery 57 time of plasmon bleach. They found that electron-phonon relaxation time of Au NPs in MgSO powder is higher than in solution by a factor of 2 that was assigned to the effect of the medium. In a re- cent work, e-p dynamics of the different sized gold nanoparticles conjugated with the chemical-ligand has been studied.52 By mapping the bleach recovery dynamics of these nanoparticles, Zhou et. al. demonstrated that Au clusters with diameters larger than 2.3 nm show metallic behavior while NPs with a diameter smaller than 1.7 nm display pure molecular behavior. In addition, it was shown that particles within 1.7 to 2.3 nm range show both metallic and excitonic behavior. In a recent study, the first crystal 63 structure of plasmonic gold nanocrystal, TBBT protected Au279 has been reported. More recently, our 4 group studied the optical properties of Au36(SR)24, Au44(SR)28, Au133(SR)52 and Au279(SR)84 using steady-state and transient absorption, time dependent density functional theory and density of state cal- 29 culations. By observing power dependent bleach recovery kinetics in Au279 (SR)84, we reported that it is the smallest gold thiolate nanoparticle that has shown metallic behavior and support localized SPR. The type of ligand (aliphatic/aromatic/bulky) being used determines the structure and properties of metal clusters.64,65 Although significant research has focused on molecule-like properties of gold clus- ters and studied how ligands alter their optical properties, the same influence of ligands on the e-p relax- ation dynamics of ultra-small clusters has not been addressed. In addition, previous theoretical studies have neglected the chemical ligand effect on the conductivity of Au NPs and consequently on their e-p relaxation. In the present work, electron-phonon relaxation dynamics of smallest sized plasmonic gold clusters conjugated with different thiolate ligands was studied using ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy. To explore the effect of aromatic and aliphatic ligands on the electron dynamics, investigations were carried out on Au279 (d ~ 2.1 nm) passivated with TBBT and Au329 (d ~ 2.2 nm) passivated with phenylethane thiol (SC2Ph), and hexane thiol (SC6). To understand the ligand effects theoretically, the free electron density of the clusters was modeled using three-layered Mie theory66,66, inspired by Peng et al.41 The size effect on the electron dynamics in aliphatic thiolate protected plasmonic gold clusters was investigated by studying the optical properties of hexane thiolate protected Au329 (d ~ 2.2 nm), Au~1400 (d ~ 3.6 nm) and Au~2000 (d ~ 3.8 nm).