Nwrm-Cs-Uk 02

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nwrm-Cs-Uk 02 Case Study De-culverting London This report was prepared by the NWRM project, led by Office International de l’Eau (OIEau), in consortium with Actéon Environment (France), AMEC Foster Wheeler (United Kingdom), BEF (Baltic States), ENVECO (Sweden), IACO (Cyprus/Greece), IMDEA Water (Spain), REC (Hungary/Central & Eastern Europe), REKK inc. (Hungary), SLU (Sweden) and SRUC (UK) under contract 07.0330/2013/659147/SER/ENV.C1 for the Directorate-General for Environment of the European Commission. The information and views set out in this report represent NWRM project’s views on the subject matter and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held Key words: Biophysical impact, runoff, water retention, effectiveness - Please consult the NWRM glossary for more information. NWRM project publications are available at http://www.nwrm.eu Table of content I. Basic Information .................................................................................................................1 II. Policy context and design targets ..........................................................................................2 III. Site characteristics .................................................................................................................3 IV. Design & implementation parameters ...................................................................................3 V. Biophysical impacts...............................................................................................................5 VI. Socio-Economic Information ...............................................................................................6 VII. Monitoring & maintenance requirements ..............................................................................7 VIII. Performance metrics and assessment criteria ......................................................................8 IX. Main risks, implications, enabling factors and preconditions .................................................9 X. Lessons learned ...................................................................................................................10 XI. References ..........................................................................................................................10 XII. Photos Gallery ....................................................................................................................12 1 CS: De-culverting London, UK I. Basic Information Application ID United Kingdom_02 Application Name De-culverting_London Application Location Country: United Kingdom Country 2: NUTS2 Code (select from list in UKI1-Inner London Annex 1) River Basin District Code UK06-Thames WFD Water Body Code GB106039023290 Description The case study is located in south eastern part of the United Kingdom, in south east London. A heavily urbanised area, at an altitude of approximately 70m AOD. Application Site Coordinates Latitude: 51.455042 Longitude: 0.030134 (in ETRS89 or WGS84 the coordinate - ETRS89 or WGS84? Specify: - ETRS89 or WGS84? Specify: system) WGS84 WGS84 Target Sector(s) Primary: Urban Implemented NWRM(s) Measure #1: N4 Measure #2: N3 Measure #3: U11 Application short description The River Quaggy had a suite of NWRM features implemented as part of a flood alleviation scheme between 1990 and 2005. The main components included: - In the upper reaches this included returning to the surface a culverted underground section of the river and creating associated floodplain (Sutcliffe Park). - A detention basin was created at Weigall Road sports grounds for flood storage - Further downstream, set-back flood defences were constructed in private gardens adjacent to the river, and channel re-profiling undertaken. A map of the locations of measures along the River Quaggy can be seen in section 12. 2 CS: De-culverting London, UK II. Policy context and design targets Brief description of the problem As urban development in the River Quaggy river valley and natural to be tackled flood plain, near Lewisham in central London, is increasing, fluvial flooding experienced by local residents and businesses has increased. In 1968 the centre of Lewisham flooded to a depth in excess of 1m, and more recent flood events have occurred. A flood alleviation scheme was required to prevent further loss to the remaining floodplain within the catchment. What were the primary & Primary target #1: Flood control and flood risk mitigation secondary targets when designing Secondary target #1: Regulation of hydrological cycle and water this application? flow Which specific types of pressures Pressure #1: Other non EU- Natural Exceedence - did you aim at mitigating? Directive (specify) Flooding of land by waters exceeding the capacity of their carrying channel or the level of adjacent lands. Pressure #2: Other non EU- Physical alteration of Directive (specify) channel/bed/riparian area/shore of water body for flood protection Pressure #3: Other non EU- Diffuse - Urban runoff - Directive (specify) Storm overflows and discharges in urbanized areas not identified as point source Remarks The flood alleviation scheme was implemented between 1990 and 2005, prior to WFD and FD, but subsequent comparison shows compliance with and benefits to a number of the Directives. Which specific types of adverse Impact #1: Other non EU- Property- Adverse impacts did you aim at Directive (specify) consequences to property mitigating? and businesses. Remarks The flood alleviation scheme was implemented between 1990 and 2005, prior to WFD and FD, but subsequent comparison shows compliance with or support for those directives. Which EU requirements and EU Requirement #1: Floods Directive- Address risk of flooding Directives were aimed at being mitigating Flood Risk to local and downstream addressed? properties. Requirement #2: WFD-mitigation of De-culverting significant pressure Remarks As noted above, the WFD and FD were not in place at the time of implementation. Nevertheless the measures directly contribute to the FD and WFD objectives. Which national and/or regional The WFD and FD were not in place at the time of implementation, policy challenges and/or but comparison has subsequently been made with these and a 3 CS: De-culverting London, UK requirements aimed to be number of local policies for which the scheme is complaint. A addressed? number of these policies include: - London Green Infrastructure Policy - Thames catchment flood management Plan - London Green Infrastructure blue ribbon network Policy - London Borough of Lewisham River Policy. III. Site characteristics Dominant land use 111 - Continuous urban fabric Secondary land use 142 - Sport and leisure facilities Dominant Land Use type(s) Other important land use 141 – Green urban areas Remarks Climate zone cool temperate moist Soil type Gleysols/ Luvisols Average Slope gentle (2-5%) Mean Annual Rainfall 600 - 900 mm Mean Annual Runoff 150 - 300 mm 40 - 60% Average Runoff coefficient (or % imperviousness on site) Based on estimate of the Urban extent across the catchment. Characterization of water quality Although it is known that water quality monitoring was undertaken status (prior to the prior to the implementation of the measures, the report with this implementation of the information was not available. NWRMs) Positive way: The existing open spaces for recreation etc within the urbanized catchment were crucial to the effectiveness of the measures. The available green space at Sutcliffe Park ensured that Comment on any specific site bringing the culverted channel to the surface and creating characteristic that influences the operational flood plain worked effectively within the urban area. effectiveness of the applied The availability of gardens adjacent to the watercourse, downstream NWRM(s) in a positive or of Manor Park, allowed the effective implementation and operation negative way of the set back flood defences in a highly residential area. Negative way: None identified IV. Design & implementation parameters Medium (eg. public park, new Project scale Tributary catchment scale development district) Date of installation/construction Implementation between 1990 and (MM.YYYY) 2005 Lifespan of the individual Time frame Expected average lifespan (life NWRMs varies, but overall expectancy) of the application in expected to be 50+ years with years occasional maintenance. 4 CS: De-culverting London, UK Name of responsible authority/ Role, responsibilities stakeholder Implementation; co- 1.Environment Agency ordination; financial Co-ordination, implementation 2. Quaggy Waterways Action and continued support for the Responsible authority and other Group scheme stakeholders involved Provision of land; support for 3. Local Residents scheme Support for the scheme and 4. London Borough of Greenwich maintenance. Support for the scheme and 5. London Borough of Sutton maintenance. The application was initiated Environment Agency and Quaggy Waterways Action Group and financed by The primary principle was to ensure effectiveness in managing What were specific principles downstream flooding. As part of this aesthetic benefit was a key that were followed in the design requirement to ensure no loss of the green areas already limited of this application? within the urban environment. In order to enable this, it was also important to have landowner acceptability and involvement.
Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoods Linked to a Network of Green Spaces Neighbourhoods
    LEWISHAM LOCAL PLAN EASTEASTEAST AREAAREAAREA NeighbourhoodsNeighbourhoods linkedlinked toto aa networknetwork ofof greengreen spacesspaces Lewisham’s East Area, with its continuous stretch of green spaces running from the riverside and Blackheath to Elmstead Wood in the south, has a suburban EASTEAST AREAAREA feel comprising a series of historic villages - Blackheath, Lee and Grove Park - Neighbourhoods linked to a originally built along the route to Greenwich. network of green spaces Following public consultation, we’ve focused on five areas across the borough. A local vision will help ensure that any development reflects the local character and is clear about what could happen on specific sites. The Local Plan sets a vision that by 2040, the Join an information session on Zoom abundant green space joined with the open Tuesday 16th March, 5.30pm -7pm expanses of Blackheath and its historic village will East Area (2nd session) be preserved and enhanced, strengthening this part More info and registration form here: of the borough as a visitor destination with broad https://lewishamlocalplan.commonplace.is/proposals/online-events appeal across Lewisham, London and the South East. Town and local centres will be strengthened with the redevelopment of Leegate Shopping Centre acting as a catalyst for the renewal of Lee Green. Burnt Ash, Staplehurst Road and Grove Park will continue to serve their neighbourhoods supported with public space improvements at station approaches. The ‘Railway Children’ urban park in Grove Park will herald better connections and further improvements to the linear network of green spaces which stretch throughout the area from the riverside and Blackheath in the north through to Chinbrook Meadows, through the Green Chain Walk and other walking and cycling routes.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Rivers Action Plan
    The london rivers action plan A tool to help restore rivers for people and nature January 2009 www.therrc.co.uk/lrap.php acknowledgements 1 Steering Group Joanna Heisse, Environment Agency Jan Hewlett, Greater London Authority Liane Jarman,WWF-UK Renata Kowalik, London Wildlife Trust Jenny Mant,The River Restoration Centre Peter Massini, Natural England Robert Oates,Thames Rivers Restoration Trust Kevin Reid, Greater London Authority Sarah Scott, Environment Agency Dave Webb, Environment Agency Support We would also like to thank the following for their support and contributions to the programme: • The Underwood Trust for their support to the Thames Rivers Restoration Trust • Valerie Selby (Wandsworth Borough Council) • Ian Tomes (Environment Agency) • HSBC's support of the WWF Thames programme through the global HSBC Climate Partnership • Thames21 • Rob and Rhoda Burns/Drawing Attention for design and graphics work Photo acknowledgements We are very grateful for the use of photographs throughout this document which are annotated as follows: 1 Environment Agency 2 The River Restoration Centre 3 Andy Pepper (ATPEC Ltd) HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE This booklet is to be used in conjunction with an interactive website administered by the The River Restoration Centre (www.therrc.co.uk/lrap.php).Whilst it provides an overview of the aspirations of a range of organisations including those mentioned above, the main value of this document is to use it as a tool to find out about river restoration opportunities so that they can be flagged up early in the planning process.The website provides a forum for keeping such information up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • London National Park City Week 2018
    London National Park City Week 2018 Saturday 21 July – Sunday 29 July www.london.gov.uk/national-park-city-week Share your experiences using #NationalParkCity SATURDAY JULY 21 All day events InspiralLondon DayNight Trail Relay, 12 am – 12am Theme: Arts in Parks Meet at Kings Cross Square - Spindle Sculpture by Henry Moore - Start of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail, N1C 4DE (at midnight or join us along the route) Come and experience London as a National Park City day and night at this relay walk of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail. Join a team of artists and inspirallers as they walk non-stop for 48 hours to cover the first six parts of this 36- section walk. There are designated points where you can pick up the trail, with walks from one mile to eight miles plus. Visit InspiralLondon to find out more. The Crofton Park Railway Garden Sensory-Learning Themed Garden, 10am- 5:30pm Theme: Look & learn Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, SE4 1AZ The railway garden opens its doors to showcase its plans for creating a 'sensory-learning' themed garden. Drop in at any time on the day to explore the garden, the landscaping plans, the various stalls or join one of the workshops. Free event, just turn up. Find out more on Crofton Park Railway Garden Brockley Tree Peaks Trail, 10am - 5:30pm Theme: Day walk & talk Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, London, SE4 1AZ Collect your map and discount voucher before heading off to explore the wider Brockley area along a five-mile circular walk. The route will take you through the valley of the River Ravensbourne at Ladywell Fields and to the peaks of Blythe Hill Fields, Hilly Fields, One Tree Hill for the best views across London! You’ll find loads of great places to enjoy food and drink along the way and independent shops to explore (with some offering ten per cent for visitors on the day with your voucher).
    [Show full text]
  • YPG2EL Newspaper
    THE YOUNG PERSON’S GUIDE TO EAST LONDON East London places they don’t put in travel guides! Recipient of a Media Trust Community Voices award A BIG THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS This organisation has been awarded a Transformers grant, funded by the National Lottery through the Olympic Lottery Distributor and managed by ELBA Café Verde @ Riverside > The Mosaic, 45 Narrow Street, Limehouse, London E14 8DN > Fresh food, authentic Italian menu, nice surroundings – a good place to hang out, sit with an ice cream and watch the fountain. For the full review and travel information go to page 5. great places to visit in East London reviewed by the EY ETCH FO P UN K D C A JA T I E O H N Discover T B 9 teenagers who live there. In this guide you’ll find reviews, A C 9 K 9 1 I N E G C N YO I U E S travel information and photos of over 200 places to visit, NG PEOPL all within the five London 2012 Olympic boroughs. WWW.YPG2EL.ORG Young Persons Guide to East London 3 About the Project How to use the guide ind an East London that won’t be All sites are listed A-Z order. Each place entry in the travel guides. This guide begins with the areas of interest to which it F will take you to the places most relates: visited by East London teenagers, whether Arts and Culture, Beckton District Park South to eat, shop, play or just hang out. Hanging Out, Parks, clubs, sport, arts and music Great Views, venues, mosques, temples and churches, Sport, Let’s youth centres, markets, places of history Shop, Transport, and heritage are all here.
    [Show full text]
  • South East London Green Chain Plus Area Framework in 2007, Substantial Progress Has Been Made in the Development of the Open Space Network in the Area
    All South East London Green London Chain Plus Green Area Framework Grid 6 Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 8 Area Description 9 Strategic Context 10 Vision 12 Objectives 14 Opportunities 16 Project Identification 18 Project Update 20 Clusters 22 Projects Map 24 Rolling Projects List 28 Phase Two Early Delivery 30 Project Details 50 Forward Strategy 52 Gap Analysis 53 Recommendations 56 Appendices 56 Baseline Description 58 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA06 Links 60 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA06 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www. london.gov.uk/publication/all-london-green-grid-spg .
    [Show full text]
  • Re- Survey of S INC S / Report for Lewisham Planning Se Rvice
    Re - survey of survey SINC s / Report for Report Lewisham PlanningLewisham Service Appendix 4: updated and new citations The Ecology Consultancy Re-survey of SINCs / Report for London Borough Lewisham Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation in Lewisham (BC) – Boundary change (U): SINC upgraded to Site of Borough Importance Name in blue: Proposed Site of Local Importance Name in red: Name change LeB01 – Grade II and Grade I merged into a single Borough designation LeB01 – Amended SINC number as a result of the above change or new site List of Sites of Metropolitan Importance M031 The River Thames and tidal tributaries (citation not amended) M069 Blackheath and Greenwich Park (Lewisham part updated only) M122 Forest Hill to New Cross Gate Railway Cutting M135 Beckenham Place Park (LNR) (BC) List of Sites of Borough Importance: LeB01 Brockley and Ladywell Cemeteries LeB02 Hither Green Cemetery, Lewisham Crematorium and Reigate Road Open Space (BC) LeB03 Downham Woodland Walk (LNR) (BC) LeB04 Pool River Linear Park (BC) LeB05 Hillcrest Estate Woodland LeB06 Grove Park Nature Reserve LeB07 Forster Memorial Park (BC) LeB08 Burnt Ash Pond Nature Reserve (LNR) LeB09 Horniman Gardens, Horniman Railway Trail and Horniman Triangle LeB10 Durham Hill (BC) LeB11 Dacres Wood Nature Reserve and Sydenham Park Railway Cutting (LNR) LeB12 Loats Pit LeB13 Grove Park Cemetery LeB14 Sue Godfrey Nature Park (LNR) LeB15 Honor Oak Road Covered Reservoir LeB16 St Mary's Churchyard, Lewisham LeB17 River Quaggy at Manor House Gardens LeB18 Mayow Park LeB19 Spring
    [Show full text]
  • The River Quaggy, Lewisham
    Benefits of green inBfernaestfritusc otuf rGeI CCAASSEE SSTTUUDDYY Increasing habitat area River Quaggy, Lewisham Background The River Quaggy runs from Bromley in Kent to Lewisham in London, through built-up areas along most of its length. This has led to flooding, which used to be managed by 'boxing' the river into an underground concrete course, a practice that made it unsuitable for fish and freshwater invertebrates, and also destroyed floodplain meadows and riparian woodland. It is also no longer considered the best option for flood risk management. Objective The objective was to 'unbox' the Sutcliffe Park section of the river, create flood storage capacity to protect Lewisham Town Centre and revise the 'mown grass and lollipop trees' style of Sutcliffe Park. Materials and Methods Site Sutcliffe Park comprises 20 ha of public open space in the Borough of Lewisham in southeast London. Approach The route of the river through Sutcliffe Park has been de-channelised and landformed into meanders. Landforming has also been used to create a variety of 'levels': the flood storage areas contain re-created wetland habitat, native trees have been planted in groups and avenues, upper levels have been interspersed with wildflower meadows and flatter play areas. Features for recreation such as boardwalks, bridges, footpaths and furniture made from Thames driftwood have been installed, and an outdoor classroom has been created. Results • A flood storage area has now been created that can hold up to 85 000 m3 of flood water. It protects 600 homes and businesses from flooding. • The River Quaggy has become fully integrated into Sutcliffe Park, considered a public asset.
    [Show full text]
  • CHINBROOK ACTION RESIDENTS TEAM Big Local Plan September 2017 2017-2019 (Plan Years 2 and 3)
    CHINBROOK ACTION RESIDENTS TEAM Big Local Plan September 2017 2017-2019 (Plan Years 2 and 3) 1 | P a g e CHINBROOK ACTION RESIDENTS TEAM BIG LOCAL PLAN 1. Introduction 2. Chinbrook Context 3. Partnership 4. Vision and Priority Areas o Priority 1 : Health & Well-being o Priority 2 : Parks & Green Spaces o Priority 3 : Education, Training & Employment o Priority 4 : Community & Belonging o Priority 5 : Routes out of Poverty o Priority 6 : Community Investment 5. Consulting the Community 6. Plan for Years 2 & 3 7. Appendices 2 | P a g e Introduction from our Vice Chairs “Welcome to Chinbrook Big Local, we call ourselves Chinbrook Action Residents Team, or ChART for short. Together we are working to make Chinbrook an even better place for people to live, work and play. We are pleased to introduce our second plan. We worked hard as a steering group to take on board the comments and view of local residents to forge our next set of priorities. There was a strong sense of the need for everybody to work together to tackle the harsh economic climate that is facing many people up and down the country which is why we have added a new priority, Routes out of Poverty. Over the last year I feel ChART has really started to make an impact in the area, doing what we intended which is galvanising local community solidarity based on what local people say they need, helping them to come together to do so. We have moved from people saying “ChART? What’s that” to “ChART, What are you up to?” and it was great to get so much positive feedback about our projects from the consultation exercise we undertook during the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • An Audit of the Surface Water Outfalls in the River Ravensbourne - ‘Outfall Safari’
    An audit of the surface water outfalls in the River Ravensbourne - ‘Outfall Safari’ December 2017 UK & Europe Conservation Programme Zoological Society of London Regent's Park London, NW1 4RY [email protected] www.zsl.org/conservation/regions/uk-europe/london’s-rivers Acknowledgements This project, funded by The Rivers Wetlands and Community Days Fund and City Bridge Trust, has been delivered in partnership with Thames21 with the support of the Environment Agency and Thames Water. It would not have been possible without the help of all the dedicated volunteers who collected the data. Introduction Misconnected wastewater pipework, cross-connected sewers and combined sewer overflows are a chronic source of pollution in urban rivers. An estimated 3% of properties in Greater London are misconnected (Dunk et al., 2008) sending pollution, via outfalls, into the nearest watercourse. There is currently no systematic surveying of outfalls in rivers to identify sources of pollution and to notify the relevant authorities. The ‘Outfall Safari’ is a survey method devised to address this evidence gathering and reporting gap. It was created by the Citizen Crane project steering group which consists of staff of Thames Water, Environment Agency (EA), Crane Valley Partnership, Friends of River Crane Environment, Frog Environmental and the Zoological Society of London (ZSL). It was first used on the River Crane in May 2016. Aims The aims of the River Ravensbourne Outfall Safari were to: Record and map the dry weather condition behaviour of surface water outfalls in the Ravensbourne catchment rivers; Assess and rank the impact of the outfalls and report those that are polluting to the Environment Agency and Thames Water; Build evidence on the scale of the problem of polluted surface water outfalls in Greater London; and Recruit more volunteers and further engage existing volunteers in the work of the Ravensbourne Catchment Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympicopolis Page 6
    Wednesday 18 November 2015 Get smart Homes& with your phone Property Page 13 AFFORDABLE TECHNO HUBS P8 BRILLIANT BRICKS P10 OUR HOME: SHADOW HOUSE P26 SPOTLIGHT ON PURLEY P32 London’s new city: Olympicopolis Page 6 (&(' .-, .' &,. -+ ( $- * $ -( .' &,. ,( &/--+ ( %($-*. # $' %('/ $$/( - (( # " #) ! ! 4 WEDNESDAY 18 NOVEMBER 2015 EVENING STANDARD Homes & Property | News stop press: Lifechanger of the week perfect business venture ISABEL INFANTES Making a stand: comic Russell Brand backed mothers who could be the cat’s whiskers occupied empty flats on the Carpenters Estate in Newham Trophy home of the week stamp of Ghost estate approval for stunning £9m new build £8.95 million: things are so easy little land tax, and only then starting when you’re rich. Take this yet-to- the build, the new owner saves be-built house on the exclusive £360,000 in stamp duty. disgrace in St George’s Hill estate in Weybridge. Stick with the present plan and you Planning permission has already get a 20ft-high reception area, five been granted and the architects are bedroom suites, a private cinema, a ready to go with their detailed spec, gym and an amazing swimming pool Newham which you are free to adapt. But by and spa. Through John D Wood buying the plot first and paying a (01932 485020). HE saga of a ghost ported in their stand by estate in London comedian Russell Brand. £1.1 million: there’s more than where hundreds of The process of rehousing enough room to swing a cat in this homes have lain tenants and buying out own- property — which is just as well, London buy of the week spacious empty for almost a ers has been going on since given that it has been a successful and bright a mile from the common Tdecade — in a borough with 2005, after the council cattery for more than 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Improve Channel Geomorphology to Create Habitat
    CASE STUDY Improve channel geomorphology to create habitat Project Summary Title: River Quaggy enhancement scheme at Chinbrook Meadows Location: River Quaggy, London Borough of Lewisham, England Technique: Structure removal, channel realignment and natural enhancement Cost of technique: ££££ Overall cost of scheme: ££££ Benefits: ££ Dates: 2002 Mitigation Measure(s) Use of green engineering techniques instead of hard bank protection Improve channel geomorphology to create habitat How it was delivered Delivered by: Environment Agency Partners: Quaggy Waterways Action Group; Lewisham Council All images © Royal HaskoningDHV copyright and database rights 2013 New, restored channel Enhancing our Water Environment – A Guide to Managing Flood Risk Sustainably 1 CASE STUDY Background and issues The River Quaggy is a tributary of the River Ravensbourne, through Chinbrook Meadows in a straight, uniform and is located in Bromley and Lewisham in south east concrete-lined channel. The upstream (southern) London. The river rises in Sundridge Park, from where end of Chinbrook Meadows is bounded by a railway it flows in a northerly direction. When the river reaches embankment carrying the railway between Grove Sutcliffe Park, it flows in a westerly direction until it Park and Elmstead. The river passed beneath the enters the River Ravensbourne to the north of Lewisham railway embankment in a culvert and then through town centre. The Chinbrook Meadows restoration site is the meadows in a concrete channel. Downstream of located in Grove Park, in the south of the London Borough Chinbrook Meadows the channel passes through a of Lewisham. gauging station and down a concrete flume. The river has been extensively modified in the past, with In 2002, river enhancement works including removal of large sections straightened, channelised or culverted the concrete-lining and re-meandering of the river in the as part of flood defence schemes during the 1950s park to create a more natural planform were undertaken and 1960s.
    [Show full text]