Diversity in US Startups 2018 RATEMYINVESTOR

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diversity in US Startups 2018 RATEMYINVESTOR DIVERSITY IN U.S. STARTUPS A report on the diversity in U.S. venture- backed startups by RateMyInvestor, in partnership with Diversity VC. INTRODUCTION DIVERSITY IN VENTURE CAPITAL As co-founders of RateMyInvestor, our mission is to provide equal opportunity and access of information to founders from all walks of In our startup diversity life, so that they can select the best funding partners to fuel the future of their companies. report, we are thrilled to be In order to help us and others in the industry better comprehend the first to shed light on the how we can achieve this goal, we needed to gain insight into the talented founders who are current diversity landscape. After extensive research, we had found some very enlightening reports (especially by The Information and building this generation’s Diversity VC) on the state of diversity within venture capital firms. However, we were astounded to find that no one had ever done any greatest innovations. deep-digging into the diversity makeup of the founding teams that the venture capital firms had funded. Austin Stofer & Bennett Quintard Co-Founders, RateMyInvestor Diversity in US Startups 2018 RATEMYINVESTOR We have spent months ensuring that our data is as extensive and accurate as possible, collecting hundreds of thousands of data points on nearly 10,000 founders and 135 of the most active venture capital firms in the world. As we recognize that diversity is more than just skin deep, our analyses run across several diversity factors, including gender, size of team, ethnic background, location, and education. We hope that our findings and recommendations will provide actionable insights on how the entire industry may move towards achieving greater diversity. Our goal is for LP’s to obtain a greater understanding of the VC’s they fund and for VC’s to become more aware of how diverse their portfolios actually are. For founding teams, we aim to provide greater insights on the investors they approach. Overall, we hope this report is not just about information but instead focuses on the actionable steps that can be taken by all members of the community. Anthony Zhang CGO, RateMyInvestor Diversity in U.S. Startups 3 DIVERSITYVC We are pleased to be supporting this important piece of research from RateMyInvestor. As we continue to generate better data relating to diversity in the technology sector, we will be better able to adopt the most effective initiatives to address the challenge and to make serious progress. Whilst the conclusions of the study are disappointing, I’m optimistic that having more evidence of the severity and reach of this challenge is a helpful step in identifying the right way to tackle it. I look forward to seeing the industry taking positive action to promote diversity and inclusion in their companies and funds. Thank you very much to Anthony and his team for asking us to collaborate on this study. We look forward to working with RateMyInvestor, and other partner associations, to shine an ever-brighter light on diversity and inclusion in the tech sector. Travis Winstanley Games Investment Director, Catalis Group Research Lead, Diversity VC 4 Diversity in U.S. Startups CRITERIA A SHIFTING LANDSCAPE Venture capital investment in the United Team Demographics startups, our team used a number of States reached $84.24 billion in 2017, The diversity factors for the startups we different sources and data gathering making it the strongest year of VC included in this report were the size of the methods. This information was collected investment since the dot-com bubble, founding team, gender, ethnic background, through a mixture of publicly available data according to KPMG. We analyzed all education, and headquarters location. Due from funding announcements, VC firm publicly available venture-backed deals to the scattered nature of information websites, and the public social media from Seed to Series D + in the past five related to the diversity of venture-backed profiles of the founders. years and selected the top 135 US firms by deal activity (# of deals). The full list of firms is included in the appendix. These 135 firms invested in 4,475 companies over the last five years (January 2013 to December 2017). There are 9,874 135 4,475 9,874 FIRMS STARTUPS FOUNDERS founders who are included in this report. Diversity in U.S. Startups 5 FOUNDING TEAMS 3% 1% 1 FOUNDING TEAM SIZE 9% 3% 9% 21% 2 66% of founding teams have two or 3 three people. A surprising 21% of venture-backed startups have a solo 66% 4 founder while 13% of teams have four or more founding members. 42% 24% 5 6 NUMBER OF FOUNDING TEAM MEMBERS 6 Diversity in U.S. Startups WOMEN ARE UNDERREPRESENTED IN VC-BACKED FOUNDING TEAMS ONLY 9.2% OF STARTUP FOUNDERS ARE FEMALE 100 90.8% MALE There is 1 woman 75 to every 3.76 men 50 at Big 5 tech companies. 25 9.2% FEMALE Diversity in U.S. Startups 7 MINORITY FOUNDERS ETHNICITY OF FOUNDERS MINORITY FOUNDERS ARE 77.1% WHITE UNDERREPRESENTED We used a combination of name 17.7%17.7% ASIAN analysis, photo analysis, and third- party demographic collectors to determine the ethnicities of the 2.4%2.4% MIDDLE EASTERN founders. Over 3/4 of the venture- backed founders we collected data on were white, and the remaining 1.8%1.8% LATINO slice of the pie was largely dominated by Asian founders. 1%1% BLACK 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 8 Diversity in U.S. Startups STARTUP LOCATION MATTERS WHERE DO U.S. VCs LOOK? Silicon Valley is still the preferred location for VC’s backing startups, with nearly half of all 42.26% investments going to startups based in the SILICON VALLEY Valley. Other tech hotbeds like LA and NYC account for a sizable number of deals, almost more than the rest of the United States combined. 19.28% MASSACHUSETTES 5.24% REST OF USA EUROPE 3.84% 13.55% 6.79% NEW YORK CITY CANADA 1.29% ASIA SOUTH AMERICA 0.53% 6.90% LOS ANGELES AUSTRALIA 0.18% AFRICA 0.14% Diversity in US Startups 9 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND 6.8% ALSO MATTERS 15.86% IVY LEAGUE HEAVY Over 1/4 of invested capital is granted to founders who attended college at an Ivy League school. 50.25% IVY LEAGUE 27.04% 27.04% REST OF USA 50.25% INTERNATIONAL 15.86% NO COLLEGE DEGREE 6.8% 10 Diversity in US Startups IVY LEAGUE FOUNDERS DOMINATE VC PORTFOLIOS 0.6 53.67% 53.67% 0.45 A TILTED SCALE 32.35% 0.3 32.35% Over half of the firms in our report had 25% to 50% of their portfolio represented by Ivy League founders. 0.15 12.5% PERCENTAGE OF COMPANIES PERCENTAGE 12.5% 1.48% 1.47% 0 0-25% 25%-50% 50%-75% 75%-100% PERCENTAGE OF IVY LEAGUE FOUNDERS ON A TEAM Diversity in US Startups 11 SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF ALL MALE TEAMS 6% 12% ALL FEMALE MIXED GENDER 82% ALL MALE IMBALANCE 12 Diversity in US Startups DISCUSSION A STANDARD FORM This information shows a staggering amount The typical founding team across of selection bias for decision-making in U.S. VC’s. These investors are largely from the these 4,475 companies was a two same gender, educational, ethnic, and person, “all male,” “all white,” U.S. location background as the founders they university-educated team residing choose to invest in.* in Silicon Valley. *The Information’s VC Diversity Index. DISCUSSION Diversity in US Startups 13 FOUNDER QUOTES “Building a diverse ecosystem starts with a concerted “Many investors make decisions based on pattern effort to be more inclusive at all levels. Startup team recognition, when nowadays there are more and more members today, become the next wave of founders. examples suggesting that successful startups are led by Successful founders become the next wave of Angels founders who don't fit the traditional mold.” and VC partners. We all know the cycle, we just don’t focus enough on inclusion.” Elissa Shevinsky Damon Caiazza Serial Entrepreneur, Serial Entrepreneur, Co-founder @ SoHo Token Labs Co-founder of Startups.co TRANSPARENCY 14 Diversity in US Startups VC QUOTES “Silicon Valley has done a poor job of fostering “VCs should make more of a deliberate effort to diversity of all forms, especially diversity of thought. spend quality time with communities of color that VCs and founders tend to back/hire people who are are otherwise unfamiliar. Another tactical suggestion in their existing network who most likely share the would be to co-host salon dinners community same views as them, went to the same school as events with the growing group of early-stage them, and shared similar life experiences as them.” venture funds managed by diverse investors, such as Cross Culture Ventures, Backstage Capital, Precursor Ventures, etc.” Kyle Lui Suzy Ryoo DCM Ventures Cross Culture Ventures Diversity in US Startups 15 ACTIONABLE STEPS FROM RATEMYINVESTOR FOR LPs FOR VCs FOR FOUNDERS Look for more than just fund Make a more purposeful effort to set Treat diversity as a core part of your performance in VC pitches. Ask to see aside a percentage of pitches each hiring process, not as an afterthought. the gender and ethnic breakdown of month for diverse and minority lead Recent studies show that higher the companies that they back, and startup teams. Along with the ethical diversity leads to higher company compare them to other GP’s who are importance of this exercise there may profits and long-term value creation*. If pitching you. This top down approach also be financial opportunities that arise you are unable to find diverse full-time has the ability to rapidly impact the from better understanding problems team members at the early stages, put way money is invested across the faced by people of different cultures together an advisory team which brings entire ecosystem.
Recommended publications
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital's Role in Catalyzing Sustainable
    Private Equity and Venture Capital’s Role in Catalyzing Sustainable Investment Input Paper for the G-20 Sustainable Finance Study Group © International Finance Corporation (2018). All rights reserved. 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 Internet: www.ifc.org The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. IFC encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly, and when the reproduction is for educational and non-commercial purposes, without a fee, subject to such attributions and notices as we may reasonably require. IFC does not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the content included in this work, or for the conclusions or judgments described herein, and accepts no responsibility or liability for any omissions or errors (including, without limitation, typographical errors, and technical errors) in the content whatsoever or for reliance thereon. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The contents of this work are intended for general informational purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, securities, or investment advice, an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, or a solicitation of any type.
    [Show full text]
  • AI & Data Technologies 2021 Atlas
    AI & Data Technologies IICCONN 2021 Atlas I C O N C O R P O R A T E F I N A N C E I C O N Strategic Analysis for AI & DataTech Fundraising & M&A AI & DataTechInvestment – 2021 Banking Atlas for DeepTech Disruptors N 2 Contents AI & DataTech Overview • ICON’s Expertise • Key Insights • DataTech Stack AI & DataTech • Detailed Market Segmentation Setting The Stage Overview • Snowflake’s Path • IPO Influence Fundraising Trends • VC Feeding Frenzy • Transaction Trends • Fundraising Valuations • Most Active Investors M&A Activity • Rebound & Resilience • Broadening Of The Buyer Pool • Premium Valuations • Private Equity Activity About ICON Corporate Finance AI & DataTech – 2021 Atlas 3 ICON’s AI & DataTech Expertise Identify Strategic Opportunities. Leverage Competitive Dynamics. Achieve Execution Advantage. Data-driven advice for a data-driven industry – ICON’s AI & DataTech Platform is a curated, proprietary data platform utilized to achieve optimal results. Company & Transaction Database Proactive & Proprietary Analysis >4,300 M&A Transactions By VC, CVC & PE Trends ▪ Firm-specific Investment Analysis >2,900 Acquirers ▪ Breakdown By Size & Valuation >3,200 VC Financings From Acquirer Appetite Analyses ▪ Product Gap Analysis >2,900 Investors ▪ Highlights Premium Acquirers >1,700 Companies Hyperdetailed Categorization ▪ Identifies Competitive Dynamics >160 Sectors ▪ Vendor Financial Sizing AI & DataTech – 2021 Atlas ICON’s AI & DataTech Platform is continuously updated. Data contained in this report will adjust over time. 4 Predictions DataTech Stack Demand Driving Investment In its IPO prospectus, C3.ai cited research pointing to enterprise AI growing at a Data Apps 24% CAGR from 2020 to 2024. VCs will continue funding companies feeding this demand, but investment will skew toward DeepTech and growth-stage companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital Limited Partnership Agreements: Understanding Compensation Arrangements Kate Litvak†
    File: 07 Litvak Final Created on: 4/2/2009 2:10:00 PM Last Printed: 4/2/2009 2:13:00 PM Venture Capital Limited Partnership Agreements: Understanding Compensation Arrangements Kate Litvak† This Article uses a hand-collected dataset of venture capital partnership agreements to study venture capitalist (VC) compensation. Several new findings emerge. First, VC compen- sation consists of three elements, not two (management fee and carried interest), as common- ly believed. The third element is the value-of-distribution rules that specify when during the fund’s life VCs receive distributions. These rules often generate an interest-free loan to VCs from limited partners. A shift from the most popular distribution rule to the second-most popular rule can affect VC compensation as much as or more than common variations in management fee (from 2 percent to 2.5 percent of committed capital) or carried interest (from 20 percent to 25 percent of fund profit). Second, VC compensation is often more com- plex and manipulable than it could have been. However, more complex management-fee provisions predict lower total compensation; thus, complexity is not used to camouflage high pay. Third, common proxies for VC quality predict higher levels of the more transparent forms of VC compensation (carried interest and management fee) but do not predict the levels of opaque compensation (interest-free loan, as determined by distribution rules). Fourth, long-term VC performance predicts fund size (which in turn predicts VC pay, con- trolling for fund size), but recent performance does not predict changes in fund size. Finally, VC compensation is less performance-based than commonly believed: for vintage years between 1986 and 1997 (most recent years for fully liquidated funds), about half of total VC compensation comes from the nonrisky management fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter Valued in Billions As Popularity Climbs 15 December 2010
    Twitter valued in billions as popularity climbs 15 December 2010 veterans Mike McCue and David Rosenblatt to its board of directors as it tightens its focus on turning its popularity into revenue. Twitter co-founder Evan Williams stepped down in October as chief executive, ceding the helm to Google veteran Costolo, who was brought in last year to help the micro-blogging service make money. Costolo, whose Web content distribution company Feedburner was purchased by Google in 2007, has A fresh infusion of investment cash pushed Twitter's been at the forefront of efforts to begin monetizing market value up to 3.7 billion dollars on Wednesday with Twitter since he joined the company last year. the number of people using the microblogging service climbing to 175 million. Twitter, which allows users to fire off messages of 140 characters or less known as "tweets," has enjoyed skyrocketing popularity since it was launched in 2006 by Williams, Jack Dorsey and Biz A fresh infusion of investment cash pushed Stone. Twitter's market value up to 3.7 billion dollars on Wednesday with the number of people using the McCue is chief executive of social magazine iPad microblogging service climbing to 175 million. application maker Flipboard while Rosenblatt's resume includes stints at Microsoft, Google, More than 25 billion "tweets" were fired off during DoubleClick and Netscape. the past 12 months, with Twitter adding 100 million new accounts during that same time frame, the "These additional resources and expertise will be firm's chief executive Dick Costolo said in an online extremely helpful as Twitter continues to grow as a post.
    [Show full text]
  • RRE VENTURES Technology Venture Capital Since 1994
    RRE VENTURES Technology Venture Capital Since 1994 130 E. 59th St. New York, NY 10022 212.418.5100 | www.rre.com DISTINGUISHING QUALITIES RRE Ventures partners with leading entrepreneurs to build world-class businesses Leading early-stage venture capital firm in NYC Over two decades of top quartile performance $1.6 billion under management 240 companies in 7 funds since inception; 114 active portfolio companies Industry-renowned investment team Unmatched Fortune 100 access to support portfolio companies RRE Ventures | Proprietary and Confidential 2 CORE TEAM • H&Q Venture Capital, JPMorgan, IV Systems, • Brown Brothers Harriman, GateHouse Investors, James D. Robinson GE John R. Hass Cheetah Korea Value Fund Managing Partner • Forbes Midas List 2013 Partner • Princeton AB Politics 1994 2010 • Harvard MBA, Antioch BA Computer Science • Advisory Capital, Morgan Stanley, Dillon Read, • Lerer Ventures, stickybits, The Kraft Group, Massive, Microsoft Stuart J. Ellman McKinsey & Co. Steve Schlafman Managing Partner • Adjunct Professor, Columbia Business School Principal • Northeastern AB Summa Cum Laude, Accounting 1994 • Harvard MBA, Wesleyan BA Economics 2013 & Finance • Former Chairman & CEO – American Express Company • Signia Ventures, Bridgewater Associates, Brookings James D. Robinson III • Ret. Lead Director – Coca-Cola; Ret. Chairman Alice Lloyd George Institution, The Wall Street Journal General Partner • – Bristol-Myers Squibb Associate Princeton AB Public Policy, Minor: East Asian 1994 2014 Studies • Harvard MBA, Georgia Tech BS Industrial
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital Communities 1
    Venture Capital Communities 1 Amit Bubna Indian School of Business Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India 500 032 Sanjiv R. Das Leavey School of Business Santa Clara University, CA 95053 Nagpurnanand Prabhala Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 February 27, 2014 1Comments welcome. We thank Alexandre Baptista, David Feldman, Jiekun Huang, Ozgur Ince, Vladimir Ivanov, Pete Kyle, Josh Lerner, Laura Lindsey, Robert Marquez, Vojislav Maksi- movic, Manju Puri, Krishna Ramaswamy, Rajdeep Singh, Richard Smith, Anjan Thakor, Susan Woodward, Bernard Yeung, and participants at the CAF, FIRS, Midwest Finance Association, World Private Equity and TAPMI conferences, and seminar participants at Blackrock, Florida, George Washington University, Georgia State, Georgia Tech, ISB, Kellogg, Maryland, NUS, the R User Group, Rutgers, UNSW, and Villanova for helpful comments. The authors may be reached at their respective email addresses: amit [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected]. Abstract Venture Capital Communities While it is well-known that syndication is extensively used in venture capital (VC) financing, less is known about the composition of VC syndicates. We present new evidence on this issue. While VC firms have a large pool of syndicate partners to choose from, they tend to draw from smaller groups of partners that we call VC \communities." We implement new techniques to uncover these groups and use them to understand preferences driving syndicate partner selection. We find a complex pattern in which preferences for dissimilar partners to extend influence coexist with preferences for similarity in terms of functional style on dimensions of industry, stage, and geographic specialization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political and Economic Implications of Sovereign Wealth Fund Investment Decisions
    Chazen Society Fellow Interest Paper The Political and Economic Implications of Sovereign Wealth Fund Investment Decisions JEREMY BROWN MBA ’09 Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) have been thrown into the media spotlight recently, with calls for the nationally controlled investment vehicles to accept or adopt some level of regulation to govern their actions and investment decisions. This paper attempts to apply general ideas from the world of asset management to demonstrate a model in which SWFs can generate excess economic returns while minimizing the political risk that is inherent in a nation-state controlling and managing an investment fund. History and Background of SWFs The difficulty in analyzing SWFs in any coherent review begins with the difficulty of determining a simple definition of a SWF. A February 2008 study conducted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lists eight separate definitions, which are further distinguished by five different objectives. For the purposes of this review, however, the focus is on two definitions that are broader than those in the IMF report. These come from the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute and the United States Department of the Treasury. The Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute, an impartial organization established to study fund effects on global economics, defines a sovereign wealth fund as follows: A Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) is a state-owned investment fund composed of financial assets such as stocks, bonds, real estate, or other financial instruments funded by foreign exchange assets. SWFs can be structured as a fund or as a reserve investment corporation. Some funds also invest indirectly in domestic state owned enterprises.1 1 Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute, “About Sovereign Wealth Funds,” Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Inc., http://www.swfinstitute.org/swf.php.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download a PDF of an Interview with James
    PURPOSE Leadership Lessons An Interview with James D. Robinson III, General Partner and Co-Founder, RRE Ventures EDITORS’ NOTE Jim Robinson fascinated by the dynamics of change about it like weeds in the lawn – they come up also sits on the private boards of a and watching the extent to which peo- every day so we have to be on guard to make number of portfolio companies, ple, companies and countries respond sure they don’t strangle what we’re trying to including Avant, CoverHound, to change or fail to respond to change. accomplish. Fast Performance and NerdWallet. Most often, we have a bell-shaped In a smaller company, change sometimes Additionally, he serves as President curve with those that lead change and rears its head in a different fashion. of J. D. Robinson, Inc. He was then we have a bunch in the middle A number of companies, including some Chairman and Chief Executive and then there is the tail that resists we have started, go out to do X and after nine Officer of American Express change until they are irrelevant. months, they fi gure the market isn’t interested Company from 1977 to 1993 The companies we deal with are in X so they change into Y. and Non-Executive Chairman of not all aimed at disrupting, but they’re Then several months later, they fi gure that Bristol-Myers Squibb from 2005 to aimed at the enterprise or network Y isn’t it either but, in the process, they have 2008, where he sat on the board James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing of the Digital Ecosystem: the 'Disruptive' Role of Sovereign
    SovereignWealthFunds15:Maquetación 1 20/10/15 17:58 Página 108 SovereignWealthFunds15:Maquetación 1 20/10/15 17:58 Página 109 Financing of the digital ecosystem: The “disruptive” role of sovereign wealth funds… Reconsidered Patrick J. Schena PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor & Senior Fellow and Co-Head SovereigNET: The Fletcher Network for Sovereign Wealth and Global Capital, The Fletcher School, Tufts University Ravi Shankar Chaturvedi Research Fellow and Program Director Planet eBiz at The Fletcher School, Tufts University SovereignWealthFunds15:Maquetación 1 20/10/15 17:58 Página 110 10. Financing of the digital ecosystem: The “disruptive” role of sovereign wealth funds… Reconsidered Xiaomi, Uber, Flipkart, Spotify are all members of the so-called growth cycles, demographic shifts, and specifically the resultant – “Billion Dollar Club”1 and all funded by sovereign wealth funds indeed disruptive – impacts of technological change.3 (SWFs). While such investments offer great fodder for headlines and “clickbait”, an analysis of the role SWFs as investors in the digital Thus, turning from themes that once portrayed SWF investments as economy reveals instead a complex path of engagement through a disruptive to markets and economies, we examine SWF investment variety of direct and indirect structures that have extended to the in the disruptive technologies and processes that are destabilizing to “Unicorns”. The digital investment patterns of SWFs can best be traditional industries in the spirit of Schumpeterian change. Our described as concentrated, opportunistic, scale-sensitive, and, analysis proceeds first with defining the “digital landscape”, then arguably, disruptive. The informed observer of SWFs will see the dissects SWF investment across the digital ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Enterprise Tech Startups Poised to Come out Stronger From
    www.businessinsider.com May 16, 2020 BI PRIME 15 enterprise tech startups poised to come out stronger from the COVID-19 crash, according to the VCs that invested in them — including John Chambers and Sapphire Ventures Benjamin Pimentel Silicon Valley legend John Chambers believes up to 45% of US startups aren’t going to make it. But the former Cisco CEO and current venture capital inves- •mMany tech startups collapse during economic tor also notes that history has shown that great com- downturns, but that’s also when the companies panies do emerge during hard times. built to last emerge. “Almost all the great high-tech companies in each generation — companies like Cisco, Salesforce, •m“Almost all the great high-tech companies Oracle, Microsoft, Google — were the ones that in each generation — companies like Cisco, Sales- broke away during an economic crisis,” he told force, Oracle, Microsoft, Google — were the ones Business Insider. “[A downturn] limits your com- petitor’s ability to access the money. It also limits that broke away during an economic crisis,” the number of companies that come at you: You’re former Cisco CEO John Chambers told Business able to break away and gain market share at a much Insider. faster pace.” Another venture capital investor, Dell Technologies •mPredicting the next Cisco, Salesforce, or Goo- Capital president Scott Darling, agreed that some gle is tough, but Chambers and other veteran startups are already “benefiting pretty substantially venture capitalists pointed to 15 startups in their from this environment,” particularly because of the portfolios that they believe are poised to come sudden pivot to remote work.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the VC Funding Gap Why Vcs Aren’T Investing in Diverse Entrepreneurs, How It’S Hurting Their Returns, and What to Do About It Beyond the VC Funding Gap
    Beyond the VC Funding Gap Why VCs Aren’t Investing in Diverse Entrepreneurs, How it’s Hurting their Returns, and What To Do About It Beyond the VC Funding Gap Table of Contents Beyond the VC Funding Gap Introduction 3 Foreward 4 What We Found: The Issue Is Systemic 5 Morgan Stanley’s Message to VCs: You’re Missing a Trillion-Dollar Opportunity 10 The Opportunity: Seven Companies With a Woman or Multicultural Founder That Paid Off 11 The Morgan Stanley Playbook for VCs 12 Methodology 13 References 14 Morgan Stanley | 2019 Beyond the VC Funding Gap Foreward Over the past five years, Morgan Stanley has worked to identify, define and address a trillion-dollar inefficiency in today’s marketplace, commonly known as “the funding gap” facing women and multicultural entrepreneurs. We’ve invested directly in high-growth-potential tech and tech-enabled startups led by women and multicultural entrepreneurs through our in-house Multicultural Innovation Lab. And we’ve helped investors who want to put their capital to work and gain more exposure to diverse founders. We’ve taken a data-driven approach to addressing the funding We found that the VC industry has yet to prioritize investing gap, and we ignited industry-wide conversations last year with in women- and multicultural-founded startups, despite our Trillion-Dollar Blindspot report. This report illuminated acknowledging the opportunity that these companies represent. the magnitude of the funding gap and the potential to earn In particular, when they encounter a woman or multicultural above-market returns, and called out some of the perceptions founder, VCs are rigid in applying their definitions of “fit” and and behaviors of investors that perpetuate the uneven funding are unlikely to educate themselves about the product, market landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Timeline
    Facebook Timeline 2003 October • Mark Zuckerberg releases Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook. It was described as a Harvard University version of Hot or Not. 2004 January • Zuckerberg begins writing Facebook. • Zuckerberg registers thefacebook.com domain. February • Zuckerberg launches Facebook on February 4. 650 Harvard students joined thefacebook.com in the first week of launch. March • Facebook expands to MIT, Boston University, Boston College, Northeastern University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Columbia University, and Yale University. April • Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin form Thefacebook.com LLC, a partnership. June • Facebook receives its first investment from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel for US$500,000. • Facebook incorporates into a new company, and Napster co-founder Sean Parker becomes its president. • Facebook moves its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. N. Lee, Facebook Nation, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5308-6, 211 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 212 Facebook Timeline August • To compete with growing campus-only service i2hub, Zuckerberg launches Wirehog. It is a precursor to Facebook Platform applications. September • ConnectU files a lawsuit against Zuckerberg and other Facebook founders, resulting in a $65 million settlement. October • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a $300,000 three-year credit line. December • Facebook achieves its one millionth registered user. 2005 February • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a second $300,000 credit line and a $25,000 equity investment. April • Venture capital firm Accel Partners invests $12.7 million into Facebook. Accel’s partner and President Jim Breyer also puts up $1 million of his own money.
    [Show full text]