New NHS Capital Funding - Central & North West London NHS Foundation Trust

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

New NHS Capital Funding - Central & North West London NHS Foundation Trust

From the Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 020 7210 4850 Bob Blackman MP, Harrow East Karen Buck MP, Westminster North Dawn Butler MP, Brent Central Ruth Cadbury MP, Brentford and Isleworth Emma Dent Coad MP, Kensington Mark Field MP, Cities of London and Westminster Barry Gardiner MP, Brent North Greg Hands MP, Chelsea and Fulham Nick Hurd MP, Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner Boris Johnson MP, Uxbridge and South Ruislip Mark Lancaster MP, Milton Keynes North John McDonnell MP, Hayes and Harlington Andy Slaughter MP, Hammersmith Iain Stewart MP, Milton Keynes South Gareth Thomas MP, Harrow West 7th December 2018 New NHS Capital Funding - Central & North West London NHS Foundation Trust I am delighted to let you know that as part of our Long Term Plan for the NHS, the following investments will be made in your constituency. We strongly support our NHS and want to help it to be the best it can be. Today’s investment shows we are making reality of that support in your area. We are funding the Oak Tree Ward - Woodlands Mental Health Wards Reconfiguration, Hillingdon scheme with new investment of up to £0.502 million which will deliver single sex bedrooms on adult inpatient mental health wards at Oak Tree Ward. This is part of £1bn extra capital funding being announced across England. It comes on top of the £20.5bn per year extra funding for the NHS over the next five years - the longest and largest funding settlement in the NHS’s history. The investment is part of the wider plan to provide better services for patients, integrate care better and renew aging facilitates. The increased funding and the Long Term Plan demonstrates our abiding commitment to the NHS so the NHS can be there for all of us, free at the point of use, long into the future. Yours ever, MATT HANCOCK .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Think of the Consequences
NHSCA EDITORIAL September 2014 Think of the consequences This July, a passenger aircraft was shot down such clinics are usually staffed by GPs with a over Ukraine by a ground–to–air missile which, Special Interest (GPSIs), many of whom do not it seems likely, was provided to one of the fulfil the supposedly mandatory experience armed groups in the area by a third party. This and training criteria for such posts. David Eedy appalling event raises many issues, including points out that the use of these ‘community’ the immorality of the arms trade and the results clinics has never been shown to reduce hospital of interference in a neighbouring country’s waiting lists, they threaten to destabilise the territory and politics, and beyond this there are hospital service and they cost a lot more than the issues of unforeseen consequences. Those hospital clinics. The service thus provided is operating this complex modern equipment not acting as a useful filter to reduce hospital almost certainly had no intention of annihilating referrals and causes only delay in reaching a true 298 innocent travellers, neither, presumably, specialist service. Further, we cannot ignore the did the providers think they might. It seems inevitable impact of this continued outsourcing likely that inadequate training, against a on education of students and trainees as the background of inexperience of such dangerous service is fragmented. At a recent public equipment, resulted in this disaster. Unforeseen, meeting a woman who had attended a local but not unforeseeable. private sector dermatology clinic told us that she could not fault the service - everyone was very Nearer to home, we are increasingly aware of professional and the surroundings pleasant - decisions about clinical services made by those except that they could not deal with her problem who know little about them, do not wish to look and she had to be referred on to the hospital.
[Show full text]
1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, 9TH MAY, 2021 – JOHN Mcdonnell and ANAS SARWAR
1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, 9TH MAY, 2021 – JOHN McDONNELL AND ANAS SARWAR ANDREW MARR SHOW, 9TH MAY, 2021 JOHN McDONNELL, Former Shadow Chancellor And ANAS SARWAR, Leader, Scottish Labour Party (Please check against delivery (uncorrected copies)) AM: Keir Starmer says he takes full responsibility for Labour’s poor performance in the elections in England. But last night, to the fury of many in the party he appears to have sacked Angela Rayner as Party Chair and Election Coordinator. He can’t sack her from her elected position as Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, but overnight there have been signs that things are coming apart. Andy Burnham, the Mayor Manchester, tweeted about Angela Rayner, ‘I can’t support this.’ Trouble ahead. I’m going to speak now to John McDonnell, Jeremy Corbyn’s former Shadow Chancellor and to Anas Sarwar, the Labour Party Leader here in Scotland. He lost two seats yesterday but he says the party are now on the right path. John McDonnell, first of all, I don’t know if you’ve had a chance to talk to Angela Rayner. Do you know whether she has been sacked or not? There seems to be some confusion this morning. JM: No, I haven’t spoken to Angie. Let’s be clear, I have no brief for Angie, I didn’t support her as Deputy Leader. I supported Richard Burgon, but when the Leader of the Party on Friday says he takes full responsibility for the election result in Hartlepool in particular, and then scapegoats Angie Rayner, I think many of us feel that was unfair, particularly as we all know actually Keir style of Leadership is that his office controls everything.
[Show full text]
FABJ5549-Fabian-Review-Summer
FABIAN REVIEW The quarterly magazine of the Fabian Society Summer 2017 / fabians.org.uk / £4.95 UPWARDS Climbing the next mountain: Lewis Baston, Jeremy Gilbert, Olivia Bailey and Philip Collins on the task ahead for Labour p10 / Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry talks campaigning, Corbyn and Trump p18 / Charles Lees assesses Martin Schulz and the SPD p24 WANT TO HELP SHAPE THE FUTURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY? JOIN THE FACING THE FUTURE CLUB Facing the Future is the Fabian Society’s programme on Labour’s renewal. It brings together a broad range of voices to challenge the Labour party to do better for the people who need it most. Through events, publications and research, we are ensuring that Labour has the fundamental debate that it needs on its purpose, organisation and ideas. RE-IMAGINING LABOUR’S PURPOSE • What is the Labour party’s vision for Britain, looking ahead to the 2020s? WINNING PUBLIC TRUST • How can the Labour party retain the loyalty of current and recent supporters and widen its appeal to be in a position to form a majority government? MODERNISING LABOUR’S ORGANISATION • How should Labour strengthen its organisation in order to build strong bonds in communities across Britain? To help the Labour party answer these questions, we need your help. We’d like to invite you to join the Facing the Future club to support this programme. You can join for a minimum monthly donation of £30, or a one-off donation of £400. Benefits of membership include a free ticket to our conferences, a copy of every report we print and regular political updates from leading Fabians.
[Show full text]
Survey Report
YouGov / Election Data Survey Results Sample Size: 1096 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 27th February - 3rd March 2017 EU Ref Vote 2015 Vote Age Gender Social Grade Region Membership Length Not Rest of Midlands / Pre Corbyn After Corbyn Total Remain Leave Lab 18-39 40-59 60+ Male Female ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Lab South Wales leader leader Weighted Sample 1096 961 101 859 237 414 393 288 626 470 743 353 238 322 184 294 55 429 667 Unweighted Sample 1096 976 96 896 200 351 434 311 524 572 826 270 157 330 217 326 63 621 475 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION: Westminster [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] Con 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lab 92 92 95 92 93 92 92 93 92 94 90 97 94 90 94 93 93 89 95 Lib Dem 5 6 1 6 3 5 5 6 7 3 7 2 5 8 4 4 4 9 3 UKIP 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Other 1 2 0 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 Other Parties Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] SNP/ PCY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Green 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 BNP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Respect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 © 2017 YouGov plc.
[Show full text]
Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS
1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS FINANCE (No. 2) BILL (Clauses 1 to 5; Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; Clauses 24 to 26; Clause 28; Clause 30 and Schedule 6; Clauses 31 to 33; Clause 36 and Schedule 7; Clause 40; Clause 41; Clause 86; Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17; Clauses 90 and 91; Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18; Clause 97 and Schedule 19; Clauses 109 to 111 and Schedules 21 and 22; Clause 115 and Schedule 27; Clauses 117 to 121 and Schedules 29 to 32; Clauses 128 to 130; any new Clauses or new Schedules relating to: the impact of any provision on the financial resources of families or to the subject matter of Clauses 1 to 5, 24 to 26, 28, 31 to 33, 40 and 86; the subject matter of Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; the impact of any provision on regional economic development; tax avoidance or evasion; the subject matter of Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17 and Clauses 90 and 91; the subject matter of Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18, Clause 97 and Schedule 19 and Clauses 128 to 130) [FIRST AND SECOND DAY] GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Added: New Clause agreed without a vote and added to the Bill. Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote.
[Show full text]
Whole Day Download the Hansard
Friday Volume 637 16 March 2018 No. 112 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 16 March 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1113 16 MARCH 2018 1114 De Cordova, Marsha McDonald, Stuart C. House of Commons Debbonaire, Thangam Merriman, Huw Dinenage, Caroline Milling, Amanda Docherty-Hughes, Martin Monaghan, Carol Friday 16 March 2018 Dodds, Anneliese Morris, David Donelan, Michelle Morton, Wendy The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Dowden, Oliver Nandy, Lisa Duffield, Rosie Neill, Robert Edwards, Jonathan Newlands, Gavin PRAYERS Ellman, Mrs Louise Nokes, rh Caroline Farron, Tim O’Hara, Brendan Field, rh Mark Owen, Albert [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Fletcher, Colleen Pennycook, Matthew Foster, Kevin Philp, Chris 9.34 am Foxcroft, Vicky Pincher, Christopher Freer, Mike Pollard, Luke Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) (SNP): I beg to Furniss, Gill Pound, Stephen move, That the House sit in private. Gaffney, Hugh Pow, Rebecca Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 163). Gardiner, Barry Pursglove, Tom The House proceeded to a Division. Gethins, Stephen Quin, Jeremy Gibb, rh Nick Reeves, Ellie Gibson, Patricia Robinson, Mary Mr Speaker: Will the Serjeant at Arms please investigate Grady, Patrick Saville Roberts, Liz the delay in the Aye Lobby, which I have reason to Grant, Peter Shelbrooke, Alec believe is not heavily populated? Green, Chris Sheppard,
[Show full text]
A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 11 January 2018 On 8-9 January 2018, Prime Minister Theresa May conducted a ministerial reshuffle. This guide has been updated to reflect the changes. The Conservative government does not have a parliamentary majority of MPs but has a confidence and supply deal with the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The DUP will support the government in key votes, such as on the Queen's Speech and Budgets, as well as Brexit and security matters, which are likely to dominate most of the current Parliament. This gives the government a working majority of 13. This is a briefing for BIA members on the new Government and key ministerial appointments for our sector. Contents Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministerial brief for the Life Sciences.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Theresa May’s team in Number 10 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities pertinent
[Show full text]
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper)
Report Stage: Monday 5 July 2021 Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper) This document lists all amendments tabled to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Any withdrawn amendments are listed at the end of the document. The amendments are arranged in the order in which it is expected they will be decided. NEW CLAUSES, NEW SCHEDULES AND AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PARTS 1 TO 4 AND 10, OTHER THAN ANY NEW CLAUSES RELATING TO OFFENCES CONCERNING PETS OR ANY NEW CLAUSES RELATING TO VOYEURISM Ms Harriet Harman NC1 Caroline Nokes Sir Peter Bottomley Wera Hobhouse Caroline Lucas Liz Saville Roberts Stella Creasy Julie Elliott Taiwo Owatemi Maria Eagle Helen Hayes Dame Diana Johnson Emma Hardy Rosie Cooper Rushanara Ali Tonia Antoniazzi Rosie Duffield Yvonne Fovargue Bell Ribeiro-Addy Barbara Keeley Anne Marie Morris Mohammad Yasin Andrew Gwynne Karin Smyth Paul Blomfield Debbie Abrahams Dame Margaret Hodge Sir Mark Hendrick Kevin Brennan Mr Andrew Mitchell Clive Efford Mr Virendra Sharma Clive Lewis Sarah Champion Claire Hanna Florence Eshalomi Simon Hoare Navendu Mishra Chris Bryant Kim Johnson Catherine McKinnell Geraint Davies Claudia Webbe Paula Barker Darren Jones Mr David Davis Jamie Stone Ed Davey Jackie Doyle-Price Derek Twigg Yvette Cooper Christina Rees Apsana Begum Stephen Farry Ben Lake Jonathan Edwards Jeremy Corbyn To move the following Clause— “Harassment in a public place (1) A person must not engage in any conduct in a public place— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
[Show full text]
Core Group Core Group Plus Neutral but Not Hostile
CORE GROUP NEUTRAL BUT CORE GROUP HOSTILE CORE GROUP PLUS NOT HOSTILE NEGATIVE GROUP Andy Alan Andy Slaughter Alan Whitehead Alan Johnon McDonald Campbell Catherine Alison Angela Rayner Adrian Bailey Alan Meale Smith McGovern Dennis Alex Andrew Gwynne Angela Smith Ann Coffey Skinner Cunningham Barry Diane Abbott Albert Owen Andy Burnham Anna Turley Sheerman Grahame Catherine West Andrew Smith Ed Miliband Caroline Flint Morris Margaret Ian Lavery Angela Eagle Ben Bradshaw Chris Evans Greenwood Bridget Ian Mearns Carolyn Harris Ann Clwyd Chris Leslie Phillipson Imran Chinyelu Chuka Barbara Keeley Diana Johnson Hussain Onwurah Umunna Jeremy Daniel Elizabeth Christina Rees Barry Gardiner Corbyn Zeichner Kendall John Emma Dave Anderson Bill Esterson Dan Jarvis McDonnell Reynolds Catherin Fiona Jon Trickett Dawn Butler Derek Twigg McKinnell Mactaggart Graham Kate Osamor David Winnick Chris Bryant Frank Field Jones Kelvin Debbie Gareth Harriet Chris Matheson Hopkins Abrahams Thomas Harman RIP Michael Emily George Clive Betts Ian Austin Meacher Thornberry Howarth Rebecca Emma Lewell- Geoffrey Clive Efford Ivan Lewis Long-Bailer Buck Robinson Ronnie Gloria de Vicky Foxcroft Colleen Fletcher Jamie Reed Campbell Piero Richard John Harry Harpham David Crausby Graham Allen Burgon Woodcock Luciana Clive Lewis Helen Goodman David Hanson Hilary Benn Berger Rachael Holly Lynch Derek Twigg Ian Murray Margaret Maskell Hodge Ian Lucas Gavin Shuker Jo Cox Mark Tami Jenny Jo Stevens Geraint Davies Mary Creagh Chapman Kate Hollern Gerald Jones Joan Ryan Melanie
[Show full text]
THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
[Show full text]
Housing Association (Rights and Representation of Residents) Bill
Housing Association (Rights and Representation of Residents) Bill CONTENTS 1 Interpretation 2 Service agreements 3 Inspections 4 Ballot of transfer of management 5Regulations 6Expenses 7 Short title, commencement and extent Bill 35 54/2 Housing Association (Rights and Representation of Residents) Bill 1 A BILL TO Make provision about the rights and representation of housing association residents; to make requirements of housing associations in relation to service delivery; to make further provision for the regulation of housing associations; and for connected purposes. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Interpretation In this Act— “estate” means a housing estate managed by a housing association or a neighbourhood in which a housing association provides housing accommodation; 5 “housing association” means a body within the meaning of section 5(1) of the Housing Act 1985 (c. 68) (housing associations) which is a registered social landlord within the meaning of section 5(4) (registered social landlords) of that Act; “regulations” means regulations made by the Secretary of State; 10 “tenants’ association” means the body which, in the opinion of the Housing Corporation, is representative of the tenants in the estate; “tenants’ jury” has such meaning as shall be prescribed in regulations. 2 Service agreements (1) A housing association must prepare and publish a service agreement setting 15 out the services it proposes to provide for the tenants in each estate. (2) A service agreement must be approved by— (a) the Housing Corporation, and (b) a tenants’ jury.
[Show full text]
UN Resolutions: Sri Lanka QSD on 5 February 2019
UN Resolutions: Sri Lanka QSD on 5 February 2019 This briefing identifies relevant reports and useful documents, including recent parliamentary materials and press articles, which may be of assistance to Members in preparing for the following debate: Lord Naseby to ask Her Majesty’s Government following the resignation of the government of the United States from the United Nations Human Rights Council where they co-sponsored with the United Kingdom the Resolution 30/1 in 2015 and Resolution 34/1 in 2017, and given the progress made towards many aspects highlighted in the resolutions, what assessment they have made of whether to annul or withdraw those resolutions. Copies of the materials are available for collection from the Library. Key Information • United Nations Human Rights Council, Resolution 30/1: Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka, 14 October 2015; and Resolution 34/1: Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka, 3 April 2017 Resolution adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council which outlines a process for the promotion of reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka, with a further resolution which reaffirms 30/1 and outlines developments made since. • Foreign and Commonwealth Office, ‘Boris Johnson: US Human Rights Council Withdrawal Regrettable’, 19 June 2018; House of Commons, ‘Written Question: Sri Lanka: Human Rights’, 23 October 2018, 179260; and House of Commons, ‘Written Question: Sri Lanka: Human Rights’, 14 January 2019, 205365 Comments by former Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, on the US’ withdrawal from the Human Rights Council. Additionally, questions focusing on what actions the Government is taking to assist the implementation of resolutions 30/1 and 34/1 are included, with responses from Mark Field, Minister of State for Asia and the Pacific at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
[Show full text]