EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Desktop Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New Holland in Australia 1945 – 1987
Sssssspppp NEW HOLLAND IN AUSTRALIA 1945 - 1987 NEW HOLLAND IN AUSTRALIA 1945 – 1987 By: Ray Smith.. November 1989 The first New Holland machines, two Model 75 balers, arrived in Australia under a war-time Government lend lease arrangement in 1945. However, the foundation on which New Holland Australia was build commenced a year later when Doring Implements was formed to import and retail the Model 76. From a small office located in a suburb (St Kilda) of Melbourne, Victoria, Doring, owned and managed by New Zealand born Basil Horne, imported product through Henry R. Jahn, New York. Although Horne was an associate of Cecil Taylor, who, at about the same time started a similar operation in New Zealand here was no company or known financial connection. With the arrival of spares for the first shipment of six Model 76 balers in 1947, a move was made to “larger” premises – a single fronted two story shop front building in the busy nearby suburb of Prahran. Doring used these premises as their HQ thru to 1953, when 6 acres were purchased some 20 miles from the centre of Melbourne (Dandenong) on the main highway to the rich agricultural area of Gippsland. An assembly and parts building fronted by a large showroom and office complex was built, complete with a wall mounted mural painted by famous Australian painter William Dargy. A sign across the front of the building “The Home Of New Holland” reinforced the strong bond, based on trust and loyalty that had developed between company and clients. This valuable relationship with owners (mostly strategically located contractors (custom operators)) developed through dealing direct and being given first rate field and parts service. -
JOURNAL and PROCEEDINGS
JOURNAL and PROCEEDINGS of The Royal Society of New South Wales Volume 143 Parts 1 and 2 Numbers 435–436 2010 THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES OFFICE BEARERS FOR 2009-2010 Patrons Her Excellency Ms Quentin Bryce AC Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. Her Excellency Professor Marie Bashir AC CVO Governor of New South Wales. President Mr J.R. Hardie, BSc Syd, FGS, MACE Vice Presidents Em. Prof. H. Hora Mr C.M. Wilmot Hon. Secretary (Ed.) Dr D. Hector Hon. Secretary (Gen.) Mr B.R. Welch Hon. Treasurer Ms M. Haire BSc, Dip Ed. Hon. Librarian vacant Councillors Mr A.J. Buttenshaw Mr J. Franklin BSc ANU Ms Julie Haeusler Dr Don Hector Dr Fred Osman A/Prof. W.A. Sewell, MB, BS, BSc Syd, PhD Melb FRCPA Prof. Bruce A. Warren Southern Highlands Rep. Mr C.M. Wilmot EDITORIAL BOARD Dr D. Hector Prof. D. Brynn Hibbert Prof. J. Kelly, BSc Syd, PhD Reading, DSc NSW, FAIP, FInstP Prof. Bruce A. Warren Dr M. Lake, PhD Syd Mr J. Franklin BSc ANU Mr B. Welch The Society originated in the year 1821 as the Philosophical Society of Australasia. Its main function is the promotion of Science by: publishing results of scientific investigations in its Journal and Proceedings; conducting monthly meetings; awarding prizes and medals; and by liason with other scientific societies. Membership is open to any person whose application is acceptable to the Society. Subscriptions for the Journal are also accepted. The Society welcomes, from members and non-members, manuscripts of research and review articles in all branches of science, art, literature and philosophy for publication in the Journal and Proceedings. -
LAYING CLIO's GHOSTS on the SHORES of NEW HOLLAND* the Title Does Not Foreshadow an Ex
EMPTY HISTORICAL BOXES OF THE EARLY DAYS: LAYING CLIO'S GHOSTS ON THE SHORES OF NEW HOLLAND* By DUNCAN ~T ACC.ALU'M HE title does not foreshadow an exhumation of the village Hampdens, as Webb T called them,! buried on the shores of Botany Bay. In fact, they were probably thieves, but let their ;-emains rest in peace. No, the metaphor in the title is from an analogy from a memorable controversy in value theory in Economics. 2 The title was meant to suggest the need for giving some historical content to the emotions that have accompanied discussions of the early period. Some of the figures which seem to have been conjured up by historical writers have been given malignancy but 110t identity. Yet these faceless men of the past, and the roles for which they have been cast, seem to distort the play of life. And indeed, it is perhaps because the historical boxes have remained unfilled, and because the background-the rest of the play and action-has not been fully explored, that some people of the early period, well known to us by name, have been interpreted in the light of twentieth-century prejudice and political controversy. We know all too little about the quality of day-to-day life in early Australia, the spiritual and material existence of the early Europeans, their energies, their activities and outlook. In the first stage of an inquiry I have been pursuing into our early social history, I am concerned not with these more elusive yet in a way more interesting questions, but in what sort of colony it was with the officers, the gaol and the port. -
History and Causes of the Extirpation of the Providence Petrel (Pterodroma Solandri) on Norfolk Island
246 Notornis, 2002, Vol. 49: 246-258 0029-4470 O The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. 2002 History and causes of the extirpation of the Providence petrel (Pterodroma solandri) on Norfolk Island DAVID G. MEDWAY 25A Norman Street, New Plymouth, New Zealand [email protected] Abstract The population of Providence petrels (Pterodroma solandri) that nested on Norfolk Island at the time of 1st European settlement of that island in 1788 was probably > 1 million pairs. Available evidence indicates that Europeans harvested many more Providence petrels in the years immediately after settlement than previously believed. About 1,000,000 Providence petrels, adults and young, were harvested in the 4 breeding seasons from 1790 to 1793 alone. Despite these enormous losses, many Providence petrels were apparently still nesting on Norfolk Island in 1795 when they are last mentioned in documents from the island. However, any breeding population that may have survived there until 1814 when Norfolk Island was abandoned temporarily was probably exterminated by the combined activities of introduced cats and pigs which had become very numerous by the time the island was re-occupied in 1825. Medway, D.G. 2002. History and causes of the exhrpation of the Providence petrel (Pterodroma solandri) on Norfolk Island. Notornis 49(4): 246-258. Keywords Norfolk Island; Providence petrel; Pterodroma solandri; human harvesting; mammalian predation; extupation INTRODUCTION in to a hole which was concealed by the birds Norfolk Island (29" 02'S, 167" 57'E; 3455 ha), an making their burrows slant-wise". From the Australian external territory, is a sub-tropical summit, King had a view of the whole island and island in the south-west Pacific. -
Media Release
MEDIA RELEASE FOUNDATION DAY AND INTERESTING ITEMS FROM THE COLLECTION This week we celebrated the 231st anniversary of the landing of Lt Philip Gidley King and his party of 22 brave souls (seven freemen and 15 convicts) on Norfolk Island, establishing the first British settlement on the island in March 1788. Notwithstanding that Norfolk Island had been previously settled by Polynesians several centuries prior, Captain James Cook discovered Norfolk Island for the British in 1774. He was entranced by both the beauty of the island and the pine and flax, which showed promise for a lucrative industry for ship building. His reports to the British High Command provided solutions to the many social and economic problems faced by Britain at the time, which included overcrowding of jails; the inability to send convicts to America after the end of the War of Independence; and trade blocks on ship-building materials, such as masts, sails and ropes, which had been put in place by Russia. The British government was also aware of the strong French presence in the South Pacific, which was of great concern, and required a strong naval presence to support British interests in the region. A fleet of 11 ships left Portsmouth, England on 13 May 1787 with the mission to establish colonies in New Holland (now Australia) and Norfolk Island. They carried convicts, marines, seamen, civil officers and free settlers, and took just over eight months to complete their journey, arriving at Port Jackson on 26 January 1788. Philip Gidley King had been selected by Captain Arthur Phillip, Commander of the First Fleet, as his second-in-command for the voyage, and upon landing in Port Jackson was nominated ‘as an officer of merit … whose perseverance may be depended upon’ to establish a subordinate settlement on Norfolk Island. -
Land Hunger: Port Phillip, 1835
Land Hunger: Port Phillip, 1835 By Glen Foster An historical game using role-play and cards for 4 players from upper Primary school to adults. © Glen Foster, 2019 1 Published by Port Fairy Historical Society 30 Gipps Street, Port Fairy. 3284. Telephone: (03) 5568 2263 Email: [email protected] Postal address: Port Fairy Historical Society P.O. Box 152, Port Fairy, Victoria, 3284 Australia Copyright © Glen Foster, 2019 Reproduction and communication for educational and private purposes Educational institutions downloading this work are able to photocopy the material for their own educational purposes. The general public downloading this work are able to photocopy the material for their own private use. Requests and enquiries for further authorisation should be addressed to Glen Foster: email: [email protected]. Disclaimers These materials are intended for education and training and private use only. The author and Port Fairy Historical Society accept no responsibility or liability for any incomplete or inaccurate information presented within these materials within the poetic license used by the author. Neither the author nor Port Fairy Historical Society accept liability or responsibility for any loss or damage whatsoever suffered as a result of direct or indirect use or application of this material. Print on front page shows members of the Kulin Nations negotiating a “treaty” with John Batman in 1835. Reproduced courtesy of National Library of Australia. George Rossi Ashton, artist. © Glen Foster, 2019 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION -
Qryholdings Scientific Name Species Code Common Name Number of Licensees Acquired Bred Disposed Hoplocephalus Bitorquatus W2675
qryHoldings Number of Scientific_Name Species_Code Common_Name Acquired Bred Disposed licensees Hoplocephalus bitorquatus W2675 Pale-headed Snake 14 7 314 Hoplocephalus bitorquatus x H. stephensii X2001 Pale-headed X Stephen's Banded Snake hybrid 1 Hoplocephalus bungaroides A2676 Broad-headed Snake 7 4 0 6 Hoplocephalus stephensii C2677 Stephens' Banded Snake 21 9 9 21 Pseudechis colletti W2691 Collett’s Snake 41 18 18 Pseudechis porphyriacus C2693 Red-bellied Black Snake 80 39 55 66 Vermicella annulata M2734 Eastern Bandy-bandy 2 3 Acanthophis antarcticus A2640 Southern Death Adder 59 76 105 95 Acanthophis praelongus Y2804 Northern Death Adder 24 41 0 23 Acanthophis pyrrhus C2641 Desert Death Adder 8 1 0 6 Austrelaps ramsayi W2615 Highlands Copperhead 20 3 0 26 Austrelaps superbus E2642 Lowlands Copperhead 12 14 0 25 Notechis ater Q2680 Black Tiger Snake 8 9 0 9 Notechis scutatus S2681 Common Tiger Snake 45 40 23 55 Pseudechis australis U2690 Mulga Snake 31 23 19 29 Pseudechis butleri M2814 Butler's Snake 1 1 Pseudechis guttatus A2692 Spotted Black Snake 20 12 5 16 Pseudonaja guttata G2695 Speckled Brown Snake 2 4 4 Pseudonaja modesta K2697 Ringed Brown Snake 1 Pseudonaja nuchalis M2698 Western Brown Snake 4 5 2 Rhinoplocephalus nigrescens E2650 EasternSmall-eyed Snake 3 6 Oxyuranus microlepidotus K2689 Western Taipan 25 10 12 21 Oxyuranus scutellatus Y2688 Taipan 17 20 24 45 Pseudonaja textilis Z2699 Common Brown Snake 32 28 35 41 Tropidechis carinatus G2723 Rough-scaled Snake 12 10 11 16 Crocodylus johnstoni K2001 Freshwater Crocodile -
Targeted Vegetation Survey of Floodplains and Lower Slopes on the Far North Coast © Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW), 2008
Comprehensive Coastal Assessment September 2008 Targeted Vegetation Survey of Floodplains and Lower Slopes on the Far North Coast © Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW), 2008 This document may not be re-produced without prior written permission from the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW). Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) 59-61 Goulburn Street (PO Box A290) Sydney South NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (information & publications requests) TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au Requests for information regarding this document are best directed to: Paul Sheringham Locked Bag 914 North East Branch Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Climate Change Coffs Harbour NSW 2450 Phone: (02) 6659 8253 The documented may be cited as: Sheringham, P.R., Dr. Benwell, A., Gilmour, P., Graham, M.S., Westaway, J., Weber, L., Bailey, D., & Price, R. (2008). Targeted Vegetation Survey of Floodplains and Lower Slopes on the Far North Coast. A report prepared by the Department of Environment and Climate Change for the Comprehensive Coastal Assessment. Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW), Coffs Harbour, NSW. Editing: P.J. Higgins. Design and layout: Dee Rogers ISBN 978 1 74122 857 1 DECC 2008/316 Printed on recycled paper CCA08 Far North Coast Targeted Vegetation Survey TARGETED VEGETATION SURVEY OF FLOODPLAINS AND LOWER SLOPES ON THE FAR NORTH COAST P.R. Sheringham, Dr. A. Benwell, P. Gilmour, M.S. Graham, J. Westaway, L. Weber, D. Bailey, & R. Price CCA08 SEPTEMBER 2008 CCA08 Far North Coast Targeted Vegetation Survey Credits Paul Sheringham: Botanist and project manager, and responsible for the survey and stratification of sites, data entry, numerical analysis and writing of this report. -
Blair's Rainforest Inventory
Enoggera creek (Herston/Wilston) rainforest inventory Prepared by Blair Bartholomew 28-Jan-02 Botanical Name Common Name: tree, shrub, Derivation (Pronunciation) vine, timber 1. Acacia aulacocarpa Brown salwood, hickory/brush Acacia from Greek ”akakia (A), hê”, the shittah tree, Acacia arabica; (changed to Acacia ironbark/broad-leaved/black/grey which is derived from the Greek “akanth-a [a^k], ês, hê, (akê A)” a thorn disparrima ) wattle, gugarkill or prickle (alluding to the spines on the many African and Asian species first described); aulacocarpa from Greek “aulac” furrow and “karpos” a fruit, referring to the characteristic thickened transverse bands on the a-KAY-she-a pod. Disparrima from Latin “disparrima”, the most unlike, dissimilar, different or unequal referring to the species exhibiting the greatest difference from other renamed species previously described as A aulacocarpa. 2. Acacia melanoxylon Black wood/acacia/sally, light Melanoxylon from Greek “mela_s” black or dark: and “xulon” wood, cut wood, hickory, silver/sally/black- and ready for use, or tree, referring to the dark timber of this species. hearted wattle, mudgerabah, mootchong, Australian blackwood, native ash, bastard myall 3. Acmena hemilampra Broad-leaved lillypilly, blush satin Acmena from Greek “Acmenae” the nymphs of Venus who were very ash, water gum, cassowary gum beautiful, referring to the attractive flowers and fruits. A second source says that Acmena was a nymph dedicated to Venus. This derivation ac-ME-na seems the most likely. Finally another source says that the name is derived from the Latin “Acmena” one of the names of the goddess Venus. Hemilampra from Greek “hemi” half and “lampro”, bright, lustrous or shining, referring to the glossy upper leaf surface. -
Name Status Type of Presence Floyd's Walnut
Name Status Type of Presence Endiandra floydii Floyd's Walnut [52955] Endangered Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Endiandra hayesii Rusty Rose Walnut, Velvet Laurel [13866] Vulnerable Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Floydia praealta Ball Nut, Possum Nut, Big Nut, Beefwood [15762] Vulnerable Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Fontainea australis Southern Fontainea [24037] Vulnerable Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Gossia fragrantissima Sweet Myrtle, Small-leaved Myrtle [78867] Endangered Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Hicksbeachia pinnatifolia Monkey Nut, Bopple Nut, Red Bopple, Red Bopple Vulnerable Species or species Nut, Red Nut, Beef Nut, Red Apple Nut, Red habitat likely to occur Boppel Nut, Ivory Silky Oak [21189] within area Lepidium peregrinum Wandering Pepper-cress [14035] Endangered Species or species habitat may occur within area Macadamia integrifolia Macadamia Nut, Queensland Nut, Smooth-shelled Vulnerable Species or species Macadamia, Bush Nut, Nut Oak [7326] habitat likely to occur within area Phaius australis Lesser Swamp-orchid [5872] Endangered Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Phebalium distans Mt Berryman Phebalium [81869] Critically Endangered Species or species habitat may occur within area Randia moorei Spiny Gardenia [10577] Endangered Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Syzygium hodgkinsoniae Smooth-bark Rose Apple, Red Lilly Pilly [3539] Vulnerable Species or species -
Fauna of Australia 2A
FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA Harold G. Cogger 23. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITION OF THE SQUAMATA The Squamata are members of the diapsid subclass Lepidosauromorpha, a group whose only living descendants are the lizards, amphisbaenians, snakes and tuataras. The lizards, amphisbaenians and snakes together constitute the Order Squamata (or Superorder Squamata, according to Estes 1983). Because the Squamata include approximately 95% of living reptiles, the phylogenetic position of this group within the Lepidosauromorpha, its component taxa, and their diagnostic features, have been the subject of numerous reviews (Estes & Pregill 1988; Kluge 1989). The three suborders of the Squamata include the Sauria (lizards) and the Serpentes (snakes), which are represented in Australia by diverse faunas of nearly 500 species, and 250 species, respectively. The third suborder, the Amphisbaenia, comprises a small group of worm lizards and related species which do not occur in Australia. The earliest known squamate fossils date from the late Permian and early Triassic, approximately 230 million years ago. These early fossils were already clearly lizard-like in their preserved features. Carroll (1988a) points out that lizards (the first squamates) do not appear to have originated as a result of ‘...a significant shift in behavioral patterns or the evolution of major new structural elements, but rather may be seen as resulting from the gradual accumulation of improvements in feeding, locomotion, and sensory apparatus.’ Carroll (1988b) includes among these changes the emargination of the lower temporal fenestra and the development of a joint between the upper end of the quadrate and the squamosal. -
I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.