Vaccines to Tackle Drug Resistant Infections an Evaluation of R&D Opportunities Disclaimer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vaccines to Tackle Drug Resistant Infections an Evaluation of R&D Opportunities Disclaimer Vaccines to tackle drug resistant infections An evaluation of R&D opportunities Disclaimer The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) does not provide presentation or other materials, including the accuracy or legal, accounting, or tax advice. Reader is responsible for completeness thereof. obtaining independent advice concerning these matters, which advice may affect the guidance given by BCG. Receipt and review of this document shall be deemed Further, BCG has made no undertaking to update these agreement with and consideration for the foregoing. BCG materials after the date hereof notwithstanding that such does not provide fairness opinions or valuations of market information may become outdated or inaccurate. transactions and these materials should not be relied on or construed as such. These materials serve only as the focus for discussion and may not be relied on as a stand-alone document. Further, Further, the financial evaluations, projected market any person or entity other than the Client (“Third-Parties”) and financial information, and conclusions contained who may have access to this report/presentation, may in these materials are based upon standard valuation not, and it is unreasonable for any Third-Party to, rely on methodologies, are not definitive forecasts, and are these materials for any purpose whatsoever. To the fullest not guaranteed by BCG. BCG has used public and/or extent permitted by law (and except to the extent otherwise confidential data and assumptions provided to BCG by agreed in a signed writing by BCG), BCG shall have no the client which BCG has not independently verified the liability whatsoever to any Third-Party, and any Third-Party data and assumptions used in these analyses. Changes in hereby waives any rights and claims it may, have at any the underlying data or operating assumptions will clearly time against BCG with regard to the services, this report/ impact the analyses and conclusions. 2 Contents Executive Summary 2 About this project 10 Purpose of this report 10 Summary of methodology 11 Background and context 12 Context of AMR threat 12 Examples of the current landscape of AMR actions 12 Vaccines as a tool for tackling AMR 13 Pathogen comparison 15 Health impact 15 Probability of R&D success 16 Probability of uptake 17 Frameworks for pathogen comparison 18 Pathogen clusters 22 Cross-cutting activities 24 Pathogen-specific information 28 Acinetobacter baumannii 28 Campylobacter 34 Enterobacteriaceae 39 Enterococcus faecium 44 Escherichia coli (enteric) 48 Escherichia coli (urinary) 53 Haemophilus influenzae 58 Helicobacter pylori 63 Klebsiella pneumoniae 69 Mycobacterium tuberculosis 74 Neisseria gonorrhoeae 80 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 86 Salmonella (non-typhoidal) 91 Salmonella Paratyphi 96 Salmonella Typhi 100 Shigella 104 Staphylococcus aureus 108 Streptococcus pneumoniae 114 Bibliography and Acknowledgements 119 Bibliography 119 Acknowledgements 140 Appendix 142 Detailed Methodology 142 Vaccine Pipeline Information 155 Greyscale versions of exhibits 170 1 Executive Summary The role of vaccines in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) AMR is a significant and growing problem. Drug resistant infections cause 700,000 deaths per year; this number could rise to 10 million by 2050 1 unless urgent action is taken. Furthermore, this figure does not capture the impact of being unable to safely perform high-risk medical procedures such as complex surgery or chemotherapy. Immediate and coordinated action is required to tackle the threat posed by AMR. Vaccines alone will not be sufficient to achieve this, but they are critical tools that can play an important role when deployed alongside broader activities. A multi-faceted, One Health approach must be used because the emergence of resistance stems from behaviour across human and animal health. The development of new antibiotics and alternative therapeutics, the rational use of antibiotics in human and animal health, more effective use of diagnostics, improvements to water, sanitation and hygiene, and vaccines can all support efforts to combat AMR. However, vaccines do have some unique advantages, and therefore bringing additional, and more effective, vaccines to market could have a huge impact on AMR. Vaccines already play a critical role, with an impressive track-record of reducing AMR 2. Both H. influenzae b and S. pneumoniae vaccines have resulted in a dramatic reduction in disease burden and have been associated with decreased incidence of resistant strains. Additionally, both vaccines have an additional “indirect” effect on AMR by reducing antibiotic usage and therefore selection pressure on pathogens. Evidence shows that universal coverage with 13-valent S. pneumoniae vaccination could avoid 11.4 million days of antibiotic use per year in children under five 3. Vaccines also offer a long-term sustainable approach to infection prevention, because pathogen resistance to vaccines is not common. For example, vaccines against diphtheria and pertussis have been in use for 70 years without resistance developing. Purpose of this report This report seeks to provide an independent, actionable assessment of the potential of vaccines to combat AMR, and encourages greater attention, focus, and funding for vaccine development against pathogens whose resistance to antimicrobial medicines was identified by WHO as posing the greatest threat to human health. By employing a carefully considered prioritisation framework to evaluate these pathogens, this report enables comprehensive comparisons across pathogens. This assessment and prioritisation provides a guide for research priorities, policy focus and investment decisions, while recognising that individuals and institutions have varied areas of focus and seek to interact at different parts of the value chain. Additionally, this report consolidates information on these pathogens, and on the development efforts against them, which is currently fragmented, providing a critical new resource to the community working to address AMR. 2 WHO LIST PROVIDES STARTING POINT FOR COMPARATIVELY ASSESSING VACCINES FOR PATHOGENS WITH HIGH LEVELS OF AMR M. tuberculosis* S. pneumoniae Priority 3: Medium H. influenzae Shigella spp. E. faecium S. aureus Priority 2: High H. pylori Campylobacter spp. Salmonella spp. N. gonorrhoeae A. baumanii P. aeruginosa Priority 1: Critical Enterobacteriaceae: K. pneumoniae, E. coli, Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Proteus spp., Providencia spp., Morganella spp. Note: WHO 2017: Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics; *M. tuberculosis was not subjected to review for inclusion in the WHO priority list. However, it was specifically acknowledged as a globally established priority for which innovative new treatments are urgently needed. e therefore included this pathogen in our analysis. Scope of this report Determining the health impact of a pathogen provides critical information, both for those looking to develop This work used the World Health Organisation (WHO) vaccines and those responsible for establishing and priority pathogen list as a starting point for the funding vaccination programmes. In the context of AMR, assessment: an understanding of the direct health impact of a pathogen It is important to note that additional pathogens, such as needs to be assessed alongside the level of AMR threat influenza virus, contribute to inappropriate antibiotic usage the pathogen causes and the degree to which it drives and selection for AMR, however they were not included in antibiotic use. the assessment at this time. By setting out a robust and durable framework and methodology, this work can be Once a case for vaccine development is established it is taken further in the future by expanding the comparative important to understand how feasible the development set of pathogens and increasing the sophistication of process is likely to be. The robustness of the current individual metrics and indicators. pipeline provides a useful indication of the ease of advancing vaccine candidates and the level of commercial Methodology employed to assess pathogens interest. A more detailed understanding of potential challenges is gained by assessing pathogen biology and Each pathogen was evaluated based on the potential the ease of pre-clinical and clinical programmes. health impact of a vaccine against the pathogen, the probability of R&D success and the probability of vaccine Assuming a vaccine is successfully brought to market, a uptake. The assessment evaluated the development of key question remains about the likelihood of implementing vaccines against all strains of each pathogen – not just a successful vaccination programme. A wide range of those which are resistant to antibiotics. bodies will influence this process, including policy makers, payers and international organisations such as the WHO, This evaluation included the criteria and indicators Gavi and UNICEF – the relative importance of these will summarised on the scorecard on the following page. vary by pathogen. Finally, it is important to identify any This scorecard assessment aims to holistically capture significant barriers that could prevent uptake. the stages of vaccine development and establishing a vaccination programme. A detailed list of sources and methodology for each metric within health impact, probability of R&D success and probability of uptake can be found in the appendix. 3 PATHOGENS ASSESSED ACCORDING TO HEALTH IMPACT, PROBABILITY OF R&D
Recommended publications
  • Puzzling Inefficiency of H5N1 Influenza
    Puzzling inefficiency of H5N1 influenza vaccines in Egyptian poultry Jeong-Ki Kima,b, Ghazi Kayalia, David Walkera, Heather L. Forresta, Ali H. Ellebedya, Yolanda S. Griffina, Adam Rubruma, Mahmoud M. Bahgatc, M. A. Kutkatd, M. A. A. Alie, Jerry R. Aldridgea, Nicholas J. Negoveticha, Scott Kraussa, Richard J. Webbya,f, and Robert G. Webstera,f,1 aDivision of Virology, Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105; bKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305-806, Republic of Korea; cDepartment of Infection Genetics, the Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Inhoffenstrasse 7, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany; dVeterinary Research Division, and eCenter of Excellence for Advanced Sciences, National Research Center, 12311 Dokki, Giza, Egypt; and fDepartment of Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38106 Contributed by Robert G. Webster, May 10, 2010 (sent for review March 1, 2010) In Egypt, efforts to control highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus emulsion H5N1 vaccines imported from China and Europe) virus in poultry and in humans have failed despite increased have failed to provide the expected level of protection against the biosecurity, quarantine, and vaccination at poultry farms. The ongo- currently circulating clade 2.2.1 H5N1 viruses (21). Despite the ing circulation of HP H5N1 avian influenza in Egypt has caused >100 attempted implementation of these measures, the current strat- human infections and remains an unresolved threat to veterinary and egies have limitations (22). public health. Here, we describe that the failure of commercially avail- Antibodies to the circulating virus strain had been detected in able H5 poultry vaccines in Egypt may be caused in part by the passive day-old chicks in Egypt (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information and Scientific Rationale
    Alternative Pneumococcal Vaccination Schedules for Infants in Fiji and Pneumococcal Epidemiology Dr Fiona Mary Russell Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 11th October, 2010 Department of Paediatrics Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences The University of Melbourne i ABSTRACT This thesis documents the pneumococcal disease burden and the results of a Phase II pneumococcal vaccine trial in the low middle income country, Fiji. The overall objective was to gather sufficient evidence for the Fiji Ministry of Health to decide whether to introduce the pneumococcal vaccination into its national schedule and define an appropriate and affordable vaccination strategy. The nasopharynx is the main reservoir for pneumococci and plays an important role in the spread of the organism. Studies of nasopharyngeal carriage offer insights into the pneumococcal disease burden in a community, particularly for potential serotypes which may cause pneumonia, and are a convenient way of determining the level of antibiotic resistance among pneumococcal isolates circulating in a population. The first study, a cross- sectional pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage survey of healthy children aged 3–13 months, was undertaken to document the prevalence of pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage, risk factors for carriage, serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of carried pneumococci in healthy young children in Fiji (Chapter 3). Pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage was common in Fijian children. Penicillin resistance was documented for the first time, and, as a result, first-line treatment for meningitis was altered. A low proportion of carriage serotypes were included in the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Invasive pneumococcal disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the very young and the elderly.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Viruses As Tools in Gene Therapy and Vaccine Development
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review RNA Viruses as Tools in Gene Therapy and Vaccine Development Kenneth Lundstrom PanTherapeutics, Rte de Lavaux 49, CH1095 Lutry, Switzerland; [email protected]; Tel.: +41-79-776-6351 Received: 31 January 2019; Accepted: 21 February 2019; Published: 1 March 2019 Abstract: RNA viruses have been subjected to substantial engineering efforts to support gene therapy applications and vaccine development. Typically, retroviruses, lentiviruses, alphaviruses, flaviviruses rhabdoviruses, measles viruses, Newcastle disease viruses, and picornaviruses have been employed as expression vectors for treatment of various diseases including different types of cancers, hemophilia, and infectious diseases. Moreover, vaccination with viral vectors has evaluated immunogenicity against infectious agents and protection against challenges with pathogenic organisms. Several preclinical studies in animal models have confirmed both immune responses and protection against lethal challenges. Similarly, administration of RNA viral vectors in animals implanted with tumor xenografts resulted in tumor regression and prolonged survival, and in some cases complete tumor clearance. Based on preclinical results, clinical trials have been conducted to establish the safety of RNA virus delivery. Moreover, stem cell-based lentiviral therapy provided life-long production of factor VIII potentially generating a cure for hemophilia A. Several clinical trials on cancer patients have generated anti-tumor activity, prolonged survival, and
    [Show full text]
  • VACCINE TECHNOLOGY II: Conference Program
    Program VACCINE TECHNOLOGY II June 1-6, 2008 Grande Real Santa Eulalia Resort Albufeira, Algarve, Portugal Co-Chairs: Barry C. Buckland, Ph.D. Research Vice President, Bioprocess R&D, Merck & Co., Inc. John G. Auniņš, Ph.D. Executive Scientific Director, Bioprocess R&D, Merck & Co., Inc. Paula Marques Alves, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Animal Cell Technology Laboratory, ITQB/IBET Kathrin U. Jansen, Ph.D. Sr. Vice President Early Phase Programs, Wyeth Vaccine Research Engineering Conferences International 6 MetroTech Center Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA Phone: 1-718-260-3743, Fax: 1-718-260-3754 www.engconfintl.org - [email protected] Organizing Committee Manuel Carrondo, Professor and CEO, IBET, Portugal Manon Cox, COO, Protein Sciences Corp., USA Matthew Croughan, Professor, Keck Graduate Institute, USA Anne De Groot, CEO, EpiVax, Inc., USA Emilio Emini, Executive Vice President, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, USA Nathalie Garçon, Vice President, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Belgium Phillip Gomez, Principal, PRTM, USA Michael Hoare, Professor, University College London, UK David Kaslow, Vice President, Merck & Co., Inc., USA Phil Minor, Head, Division of Virology, NIBSC, UK Octavio Ramirez, Professor, Institute of Biotechnology, UNAM, Mexico Rino Rappuoli, Vice President, Novartis Vaccines, Italy Jerald Sadoff, CEO, Aeras Global TB Vaccine Foundation, USA Volker Sandig, Vice President, ProBioGen AG, Germany George Siber, Consultant, USA John Vose, Consultant, France David Weiner, Professor, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, USA Sunday, June 1, 2008 03:30 pm – 05:30 pm Registration 05:30 pm – 06:00 pm Welcome and conference overview 06:00 pm – 07:00 pm The Challenge of Providing an Effective, but Technically Complex, Vaccine to the Developing World Emilio Emini, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, USA 07:00 pm – 08:00 pm Reception 08:00 pm – 10:00 pm Opening Dinner and entertainment IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENTS • Audiotaping, videotaping and photography of presentations are strictly prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Report WHO/Health Canada Consultation on Serological Criteria for Evaluation and Licensing of New Pneumococcal Vaccines
    Distribution: General English only Meeting Report WHO/Health Canada Consultation on Serological Criteria for Evaluation and Licensing of New Pneumococcal Vaccines 7-8 July 2008 Ottawa, Canada Contents Abstract 1. Background information and objectives of the meeting 2. Recommendations for pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in the context of the WHO Biological Standardization Programme 3. The impact of the pneumococcal vaccines worldwide 4. Serological criteria for licensing pneumococcal vaccines 5. Outcomes of the studies conducted by the vaccine manufacturers: experience with ELISA 6. Current understanding of the surrogates of protection 7. Conduct and evaluation of ELISA assays - directions for future 8. Regulatory considerations for pneumococcal conjugate vaccines - round table discussion 9. Conclusions and way forward 10. References 11. Participants of the Consultation - 2 - Abstract New pneumococcal vaccine formulations containing more conjugated serotypes are at advanced stages of clinical development and are likely to be subject to regulatory assessment soon. There are also currently a number of initiatives to facilitate the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in developing countries. These initiatives are dependent upon the vaccines being satisfactorily licensed and subsequently prequalified by the WHO for use by UN agencies. WHO recommendations for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine production and control were established in 2003 and published in the WHO Technical Report Series (TRS) 927, annex 2. These recommendations have served as a basis for setting up national requirements for the evaluation and licensing of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. The Consultation aimed to provide regulators and manufacturers with further guidance regarding the serological criteria for licensing of new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines based on a review of the scientific basis for the recommendations made in TRS 927 and any recent relevant data.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Toward the Development of Advanced
    STUDY TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF ADVANCED INFLUENZA VACCINES DISSERTATION Presented in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Leyi Wang B.S.,M.S. Graduate Program in Veterinary Preventive Medicine The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Professor Chang-Won Lee, advisor Professor Y.M. Saif, Professor Daral J. Jackwood Professor Jeffrey T. LeJeune Copyright by Leyi Wang 2009 ABSTRACT Avian influenza is one of the most economically important diseases in poultry. Since it was found in Italy in 1878, avian influenza virus has caused numerous outbreaks around the world, resulting in considerable economic losses in poultry industry. In addition to affecting poultry, different subtypes of avian influenza viruses can infect many other species, thus complicating prevention and control. Killed and fowlpox virus vectored HA vaccines have been used in the field as one of effective strategies in a comprehensive control program to prevent and control avian influenza. Live attenuated vaccines for poultry are still under development. Live attenuated vaccines can closely mimic natural infection inducing long-lasting humoral and cellular immunity. In addition, they may be used for mass vaccination. However, concerns with spread of live vaccine viruses, mutation into virulent strains from live attenuated viruses, and reassortment of vaccine and field strains prevent recommending live vaccines as poultry vaccines in the field. For this reason, there are increasing interests in the development of in ovo vaccines that can reduce the risk of spreading the vaccine virus. Therefore, in the first three parts of our study, we have explored several strategies (NS1 truncation, temperature sensitive (ts) mutations, HA substitution, and non-coding region (NCR) mutations) to attenuate viruses to reach this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • 17-674-8261 [email protected]
    For media: Jessica Rowlands Feinstein Kean Healthcare 202-729-4089 [email protected] For investors: Bob Farrell Genocea Biosciences 617-674-8261 [email protected] GENOCEA BIOSCIENCES APPOINTS KATRINE BOSLEY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; VACCINE INDUSTRY LEADER GEORGE SIBER, M.D. TO SERVE AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND HEAD OF SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD Cambridge, MA, November 18, 2013—Genocea Biosciences, Inc., a clinical-stage company developing novel T cell vaccines, announced today that Katrine Bosley, who previously served as an independent board member, has been named Chairman of the Board of Directors. Previous Chairman, George Siber, M.D., will continue to serve as an Executive Director on the Company’s Board of Directors and head of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board. “We are fortunate to continue to draw on Katrine and George’s expertise,” said Chip Clark, CEO of Genocea. “George, a leading authority on vaccines, will continue to play a central role in our portfolio development. Katrine’s business experience will help guide our continued growth as a company. Together, the new roles for Katrine and George support our ambition to continue to advance pioneering new vaccines.” Genocea’s lead programs include GEN-003, a therapeutic vaccine candidate designed to treat people infected with Herpes Simplex Virus type 2 (HSV-2), and GEN-004, a vaccine candidate to prevent infections caused by Pneumococcus. Genocea reported positive interim Phase 1/2a data for GEN-003, including a highly statistically significant 51% reduction in viral shedding in a late-breaker oral presentation at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC 2013) in September.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Dos Santos Corrêa Amorim Avaliação De
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL FLUMINENSE INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS E BIOTECNOLOGIA LEONARDO DOS SANTOS CORRÊA AMORIM AVALIAÇÃO DE SUBSTÂNCIAS NATURAIS EXTRAÍDAS DAS ALGAS MARINHAS Dictyota friabilis E Osmundaria obtusiloba E SUBSTÂNCIAS SINTÉTICAS DERIVADOS DE NAFTOQUINONAS E QUINOLINAS FRENTE AOS VÍRUS DE IMPORTÂNCIA CLÍNICA (HIV-1, ZIKV, HSV-1 e MAYV). Tese de Doutorado submetida à Universidade Federal Fluminense como requisito parcial visando à obtenção do grau de Doutor em Ciências e Biotecnologia. Orientador(es): Izabel Christina Nunes de Palmer Paixão Claudio Cesar Cirne dos Santos NITERÓI 2020 I LEONARDO DOS SANTOS CORRÊA AMORIM AVALIAÇÃO DE SUBSTÂNCIAS NATURAIS EXTRAÍDAS DAS ALGAS MARINHAS Dictyota friabilis E Osmundaria obtusiloba E SUBSTÂNCIAS SINTÉTICAS DERIVADOS DE NAFTOQUINONAS E QUINOLINAS FRENTE AOS VÍRUS DE IMPORTÂNCIA CLÍNICA (HIV-1, ZIKV, HSV-1 e MAYV). Trabalho desenvolvido no Laboratório de Virologia Molecular do Departamento de Biologia Celular e Molecular do Instituto de Biologia, Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense. Apoio Financeiro: CAPES, CNPq, FAPERJ, UFF-FOPESQ. Tese de Doutorado submetida à Universidade Federal Fluminense como requisito parcial visando à obtenção do grau de Doutor em Ciências e Biotecnologia. Orientador(es): Izabel Christina Nunes de Palmer Paixão Claudio Cesar Cirne dos Santos II Ficha catalográfica automática - SDC/BCV Gerada com informações fornecidas pelo autor C824a Corrêa amorim, Leonardo dos Santos AVALIAÇÃO DE SUBSTÂNCIAS NATURAIS EXTRAÍDAS DAS ALGAS MARINHAS Dictyota friabilis E Osmundaria obtusiloba E SUBSTÂNCIAS SINTÉTICAS DERIVADOS DE NAFTOQUINONAS E QUINOLINAS FRENTE AOS VÍRUS DE IMPORTÂNCIA CLÍNICA (HIV-1, ZIKV, HSV-1 e MAYV). / Leonardo dos Santos Corrêa amorim ; Izabel Christina Nunes de Palmer Paixão, orientadora ; Cláudio César Cirne dos Santos, coorientadora.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTELLAS to FORM STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP with CLEARPATH to BUILD VACCINE PORTFOLIO In‐License Vaccine Technology for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) from Mymetics
    ASTELLAS TO FORM STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP WITH CLEARPATH TO BUILD VACCINE PORTFOLIO In‐license Vaccine Technology for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) from Mymetics Tokyo, Japan; Rockville, MD; and Epalinges, Switzerland – January 6, 2014 – Astellas Pharma Inc. (Astellas) and ClearPath Development Company (ClearPath) announced today a strategic partnership to form a portfolio of development companies focused on vaccines targeting infectious diseases. The partnership was established to support Astellas’ goal of building a global vaccine franchise and launched its first company, RSV Corporation (RSVC), in December 2013. Astellas will fund RSVC’s development of a virosome vaccine technology, licensed from Mymetics Corporation (Mymetics ‐ OTC BB: MYMX), for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) through completion of a Phase 2b human proof‐of‐concept study. Based on the strategic partnership, Astellas received exclusive rights to acquire RSVC as well as further develop and commercialize the vaccine product. “This partnership highlights our commitment to build a global vaccine business and represents a highly efficient model for bringing innovative vaccines to market. It is also a unique opportunity for Astellas to utilize external cutting edge science and technology to enhance our ability to generate innovative drugs, as part of the “Reshaping Research Framework” program announced in May, 2013,” said Kenji Yasukawa, Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer, Astellas. RSV is a respiratory pathogen which infects patients of all ages. The infection can be especially severe in infants and older adults with chronic pulmonary or cardiovascular disease. Each year the virus infects 64 million people and is responsible for 160,000 deaths worldwide. Currently, there is no vaccine available for this virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccines: Past, Present and Future
    HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Vaccines: past, present and future Stanley A Plotkin The vaccines developed over the first two hundred years since Jenner’s lifetime have accomplished striking reductions of infection and disease wherever applied. Pasteur’s early approaches to vaccine development, attenuation and inactivation, are even now the two poles of vaccine technology. Today, purification of microbial elements, genetic engineering and improved knowledge of immune protection allow direct creation of attenuated mutants, expression of vaccine proteins in live vectors, purification and even synthesis of microbial antigens, and induction of a variety of immune responses through manipulation of DNA, RNA, proteins and polysaccharides. Both noninfectious and infectious diseases are now within the realm of vaccinology. The profusion of new vaccines enables new populations to be targeted for vaccination, and requires the development of routes of administration additional to injection. With all this come new problems in the production, regulation and distribution of vaccines. http://www.nature.com/naturemedicine “The Circassians [a Middle Eastern people] perceived that of a thou- mild illness in humans, could prevent smallpox. This discovery not sand persons hardly one was attacked twice by full blown smallpox; only led to the eradication of smallpox in the twentieth century, but that in truth one sees three or four mild cases but never two that are also gave cachet to the idea of deliberate protection against exposure serious and dangerous; that in a word one never truly has that illness to infectious diseases. twice in life.” The history of vaccination as a deliberate endeavor began in the Voltaire, “On Variolation,” Philosophical Letters, 1734 laboratory of Louis Pasteur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immunological Basis for Immunization Series
    The Immunological Basis for Immunization Series Module 23: Influenza Vaccines Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals The immunological basis for immunization series: module 23: influenza vaccines (Immunological basis for immunization series; module 23) ISBN 978-92-4-151305-0 © World Health Organization 2017 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non- commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The immunological basis for immunization series: module 23: influenza vaccines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (Immunological basis for immunization series; module 23). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
    [Show full text]
  • Reported on January 27, 2020
    Introduction 3 Executive Summary 5 Chapter 1 Second Round of Survey : Data Analysis 10 Chapter 2 Comparative Analysis (2020 and 2021) 37 Chapter 3 A Discourse on Pandemic Viruses and Vaccines -PVS Kumar 60 Chapter 4 Persisting Socio-economic Crisis: COVID-19 Lays Bare the Social Fault Lines1 - Prof. Arun Kumar 96 Annexure 1 113 Annexure 2 120 Annexure 2a 129 Index 1 The Second Pulse of the Pandemic : A Sudden Surge in Scientic Temper during the Covid-19 Crisis © Anhad 2021 Acknowledgement : PM Bhargava Foundation We are thankful to the following for helping us collect the data : Bhavesh Bariya Bhavna Sharma Deshdeep Dhankar Dev Desai Farida Khan Farhat Khan Jagori Rural Manish Kumar Ray Manisha Trivedi Mukhtar Shaikh Nazneen Shaikh Published by : Printed by : Pullshoppe 9810213737 2 Introduction Scientific community rises to the occasion Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), after mutation, found a new host, the human cell, and comfortably multiplied itself. Used human cells as copying machines and made millions of copies in nasal cavities, throats and lungs at times in human eyes, which could survive in aerosols and various surfaces for more than 72 hours. The human bodies proved to be secured habitable housing colonies, which not only offered environment for its multiplication within the body at an exponential rate but also helped it to travel all over the globe. Within human cells it also mutated, changed in shape and content, and became extra virulent, which made it extremely difficult to suppress or impede its propagation. Evidently, the virus showed no signs of leaving the newfound housing complexes in a hurry.
    [Show full text]