Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed. -
Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11607-8 — a Natural History of Ladybird Beetles M. E. N. Majerus , Executive Editor H. E. Roy , P
Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11607-8 — A Natural History of Ladybird Beetles M. E. N. Majerus , Executive Editor H. E. Roy , P. M. J. Brown Index More Information Index 2-isopropyl-3-methoxy-pyrazine, 238 281, 283, 285, 287–9, 291–5, 297–8, 2-phenylethylamine, 237 301–3, 311, 314, 316, 319, 325, 327, 329, 335 abdomen, 17, 20, 22, 24, 28–9, 32, 38, 42, 110, Adalia 4-spilota,80 114, 125, 128, 172, 186, 189, 209–10, Adalia conglomerata, 255 218 adaline, 108, 237, 241 Acacia, 197, 199 adalinine, 237 acaricides, 316 adelgids, 29, 49, 62, 65, 86, 91, 176, 199, 308, Acaridae, 217 310, 322 Acarina, 205, 217 Adonia, 44, 71 Acer pseudoplatanus, 50, 68, 121 aggregations, 163, 165, 168, 170, 178, 184, Acraea, 228, 297, 302 221, 312, 324 Acraea encedana, 302 Aiolocaria, 78, 93, 133, 276 Acraea encedon, 297, 302 Aiolocaria hexaspilota,78 Acyrthosiphon nipponicum, 101 Aiolocaria mirabilis, 133, 276 Acyrthosiphon pisum, 75, 77, 90, 92, 97–101, albino, 273 116, 239 Alces alces,94 Adalia, 5–6, 10, 22, 34, 44, 64, 70, 78, 80, 86, Aleyrodidae, 91, 310 123, 125, 128, 130, 132, 140, 143, 147, alfalfa, 119, 308, 316, 319, 325 159–60, 166–7, 171, 180–1, 218, 222, alimentary canal, 29, 35, 221 234, 237, 239, 241, 255, 259–60, 262, alkaloids, x, 99–100, 195–7, 202, 236–9, 241–2, 269, 279, 281, 284, 286, 298, 311, 325, 245–6 327, 335 Allantonematidae, 220 Adalia 10-punctata, 22, 70, 80, 86, 98–100, anal cremaster, 38, 40 104, 108, 116, 132, 146–7, 149, Anatis, 4, 17, 23, 41, 44, 66, 76, 89, 102, 131, 154, 156, 160, 174, 181–3, 188, 148, 165, 186, 191, 193, -
Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Leiestinae) with a Checklist and Nomenclatural Notes Regarding Fossil Endomychidae
Zootaxa 3755 (4): 391–400 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3755.4.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:13446D49-76A1-4C12-975E-F59106AF4BD3 Glesirhanis bercioi, a new genus and species from Baltic amber (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Leiestinae) with a checklist and nomenclatural notes regarding fossil Endomychidae FLOYD W. SHOCKLEY1& VITALY I. ALEKSEEV2 1Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 165, Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] 2Department of Zootechny, Kaliningrad State Technical University, Sovetsky av. 1. 236000, Kaliningrad, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new genus and species of handsome fungus beetle, Glesirhanis bercioi gen. nov., sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Leiestinae) is described from Baltic amber. The newly described genus is compared with all known extant and extinct genera of the subfamily. A key to the genera of Leiestinae including fossils and a checklist of fossil Endomychidae are provided. The status of two taxa previously placed in Endomychidae, Palaeoendomychus gymnus Zhang and Tetrameropsis mesozoica Kirejtshuk & Azar, is discussed, and a new status for the latter, elevating it to the family-level as Tetrameropseidae status nov., is proposed. Key words: new genus, new species, new status, Coleoptera, Endomychidae, Leiestinae, Baltic amber, Tertiary, Eocene, key, checklist, fossil Introduction Baltic amber (succinite) constitutes the largest known deposit of fossil plant resin and the richest repository of fossil insects of any age. Unfortunately, most references to Coleoptera in Baltic amber are only determined to family or generic levels. -
FAMILY ENDOMYCHIDAE (Handsome Fungus Beetles)
FAMILY ENDOMYCHIDAE (Handsome fungus beetles) J.M. Campbell This family is found in most regions of the world, but the majority of species occur in tropical areas. The ranges of 15 species extend northwards into Canada. Adults and larvae may be collected on soft fungi and in leaf litter or under bark with fungal growth. One species, Mycetaea subterranea (M. hirta in most publications), is a pest of stored products. Most species feed on fungi. Because of their moderately large size and often bright coloration, many North American species are taxonomically well known. However, the family has never been revised for North America. The genera of the world were reviewed by Strohecker (1953) and Hatch (1962) treated the genera and species occurring in the Pacific Northwest. A modern revision of the North American species of this family is needed. NT (1); BC (7); AB (2); SK (1); MB (4); ON (10); PQ (7); NB (2); NS (6); PE (1); NF (2); I (2) Subfamily MYCETAEINAE Tribe Mycetaeini Genus SYMBIOTES Redtenbacher S. duryi Blatchley - - - - - - - ON - - - - - - lacustris Casey montanus Casey oblongus Casey pilosus Casey waltoni Dury S. gibberosus (Lucas)+ - - - - - - - ON - - - - - - montanus Casey Genus MYCETAEA Stephens M. subterranea (Fabricius)+ - - - BC - - - ON PQ - NS PE - NF fumata Stephens hirta (Marsham) Tribe Leiestini Key to North American species: Blaisdell (1931) Genus RHANIDEA Strohecker Rhanis LeConte R. unicolor (Ziegler) - - - - - - - ON PQ - - - - - apicalis (Melsheimer) haemorrhoidalis (Guérin-Méneville) Genus STETHORHANIS Blaisdell S. borealis Blaisdell - - - BC - - - - - - - - - - Genus PHYMAPHORA Newman P. californica Horn - - - BC - - - - - - - - - - P. pulchella Newman - - - - - - MB ON PQ - NS - - - crassicornis (Melsheimer) puncticollis (Ziegler) Subfamily STENOTARSINAE Tribe Stenotarsini Genus DANAE Reiche D. -
The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State -
A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015
A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block -
Coleoptera: Introduction and Key to Families
Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA INTRODUCTION AND KEYS TO FAMILIES By R. A. CROWSON LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 31st December, 1956 Price-res. c~ . HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows : I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. 11. Hemiptera. Ill. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha. Volumes 11 to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specify in advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this new series, and each part will be the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists. -
Comparative Study of Head Structures of Larvae of Sphindidae and Protocucujidae (Coleóptera: Cucujoidea)
Eur. J. Entorno?. 98: 219-232, 2001 ISSN 1210-5759 Comparative study of head structures of larvae of Sphindidae and Protocucujidae (Coleóptera: Cucujoidea) Rolf Georg BEUTEL1 and Stanislaw Adam SLIPIÑSKI2 'Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany; e-mail:[email protected] 2Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland, e-mail:[email protected] Key words.Cucujoidea, Sphindidae, Protocucujidae, larvae, morphology, phylogeny Abstract. Selected representatives of Cucujoidea, Cleroidea, Tenebrionoidea, Chrysomelidae, and Lymexylidae were examined. External and internal head structures of larvae ofSphindus americanus and Ericmodes spp. are described in detail. The data were analyzed cladistically. A sister group relationship between Sphindidae and Protocucujidae is suggested by the vertical position of the labrum. The monophyly of Cucujiformia is supported by the reduced dorsal and anterior tentorial arms, fusion of galea and lacinia, and the presence of tube-like salivary glands. Absence of M. tentoriopraementalis inferior and presence of a short prepharyngeal tube are potential synapomorphies of Cleroidea, Cucujoidea and Tenebrionoidea. The monophyly of Cleroidea and Cucujoidea is suggested by the unusual attachment of the M. tentoriostipitalis to the ventral side of the posterior hypopharynx. Cucujoidea are paraphyletic. The families Endomychidae, Coccinellidae and Nitidulidae are more closely related to the monophyletic Cleroidea, than to other cucujoid groups. Separation of the posterior tentorial arms from the tentorial bridge and presence of a maxillolabial complex are synapomorphic features of Cleroidea and these cucujoid families. For a reliable reconstruction of cucujoid interrelation ships, further characters and taxa need to be studied. INTRODUCTION for a reconstruction of the phylogeny of the cucujoid, Sphindidae and Protocucujidae are two small families tenebrionoid and cleroid families. -
Two New Handsome Fungus Beetle (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Lycoperdininae, Epopocinae) Records for Oklahoma Chris T
C.T. McAllister and S.W. Chordas, III 77 Two New Handsome Fungus Beetle (Coleoptera: Endomychidae: Lycoperdininae, Epopocinae) Records for Oklahoma Chris T. McAllister Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745 Stephen W. Chordas, III Center for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 Insects belonging to the order Coleoptera htm). These beetles are relatively small to include more described species (> 400,000) than moderately sized, mostly reddish-brown in any other group of organism on Earth. As such, color and usually with contrasting markings they make up 40% of all insect species described on the pronotum and/or elytra. The subfamily to date, which is also about 25% of all animals Lycoperdininae constitutes the largest subfamily (McHugh and Liebherr 2009). of Endomychidae, containing 38 genera and over 635 described species (Tomaszewska 2005). The handsome fungus beetles of the family Endomychidae currently includes During July and September 2020, two beetles approximately 130 genera and 1,782 species were collected below a night light at a residence and subspecies arranged among 12 subfamilies in Hochatown, McCurtain County. They with the highest diversity in tropical and were transferred to individual vials containing subtropical areas of Africa, Asia and the 70% (v/v) ethanol. Voucher specimens were Americas (Shockley et al. 2009a, b). In terms deposited in the C. A. Triplehorn Collection at of diversity in Oklahoma, there are 10 genera The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. and 12 species in the family (http://entoweb. Dorsal habitus images of each species (Figs. okstate.edu/museum/coleoptera/Endomychidae. -
Your Name Here
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DEAD WOOD AND ARTHROPODS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by MICHAEL DARRAGH ULYSHEN (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT The importance of dead wood to maintaining forest diversity is now widely recognized. However, the habitat associations and sensitivities of many species associated with dead wood remain unknown, making it difficult to develop conservation plans for managed forests. The purpose of this research, conducted on the upper coastal plain of South Carolina, was to better understand the relationships between dead wood and arthropods in the southeastern United States. In a comparison of forest types, more beetle species emerged from logs collected in upland pine-dominated stands than in bottomland hardwood forests. This difference was most pronounced for Quercus nigra L., a species of tree uncommon in upland forests. In a comparison of wood postures, more beetle species emerged from logs than from snags, but a number of species appear to be dependent on snags including several canopy specialists. In a study of saproxylic beetle succession, species richness peaked within the first year of death and declined steadily thereafter. However, a number of species appear to be dependent on highly decayed logs, underscoring the importance of protecting wood at all stages of decay. In a study comparing litter-dwelling arthropod abundance at different distances from dead wood, arthropods were more abundant near dead wood than away from it. In another study, ground- dwelling arthropods and saproxylic beetles were little affected by large-scale manipulations of dead wood in upland pine-dominated forests, possibly due to the suitability of the forests surrounding the plots. -
Biodiversity of Coleoptera and the Importance of Habitat Structural Features in a Sierra Nevada Mixed-Conifer Forest
COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY Biodiversity of Coleoptera and the Importance of Habitat Structural Features in a Sierra Nevada Mixed-conifer Forest 1 2 KYLE O. APIGIAN, DONALD L. DAHLSTEN, AND SCOTT L. STEPHENS Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, 137 Mulford Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720Ð3114 Environ. Entomol. 35(4): 964Ð975 (2006) ABSTRACT Beetle biodiversity, particularly of leaf litter fauna, in the Sierran mixed-conifer eco- system is poorly understood. This is a critical gap in our knowledge of this important group in one of the most heavily managed forest ecosystems in California. We used pitfall trapping to sample the litter beetles in a forest with a history of diverse management. We identiÞed 287 species of beetles from our samples. Rarefaction curves and nonparametric richness extrapolations indicated that, despite intensive sampling, we undersampled total beetle richness by 32Ð63 species. We calculated alpha and beta diversity at two scales within our study area and found high heterogeneity between beetle assemblages at small spatial scales. A nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination revealed a community that was not predictably structured and that showed only weak correlations with our measured habitat variables. These data show that Sierran mixed conifer forests harbor a diverse litter beetle fauna that is heterogeneous across small spatial scales. Managers should consider the impacts that forestry practices may have on this diverse leaf litter fauna and carefully consider results from experimental studies before applying stand-level treatments. KEY WORDS Coleoptera, pitfall trapping, leaf litter beetles, Sierra Nevada The maintenance of high biodiversity is a goal shared Sierras is available for timber harvesting, whereas only by many conservationists and managers, either be- 8% is formally designated for conservation (Davis cause of the increased productivity and ecosystem and Stoms 1996). -
Xylobionte Käfergemeinschaften (Insecta: Coleoptera)
©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.zobodat.at Carinthia II n 205./125. Jahrgang n Seiten 439–502 n Klagenfurt 2015 439 Xylobionte Käfergemeinschaften (Insecta: Coleoptera) im Bergsturzgebiet des Dobratsch (Schütt, Kärnten) Von Sandra AURENHAMMER, Christian KOMPOscH, Erwin HOLZER, Carolus HOLZscHUH & Werner E. HOLZINGER Zusammenfassung Schlüsselwörter Die Schütt an der Südflanke des Dobratsch (Villacher Alpe, Gailtaler Alpen, Villacher Alpe, Kärnten, Österreich) stellt mit einer Ausdehnung von 24 km² eines der größten dealpi Totholzkäfer, nen Bergsturzgebiete der Ostalpen dar und ist österreichweit ein Zentrum der Biodi Arteninventar, versität. Auf Basis umfassender aktueller Freilanderhebungen und unter Einbeziehung Biodiversität, diverser historischer Datenquellen wurde ein Arteninventar xylobionter Käfer erstellt. Collection Herrmann, Die aktuellen Kartierungen erfolgten schwerpunktmäßig in der Vegetations Buprestis splendens, periode 2012 in den Natura2000gebieten AT2112000 „Villacher Alpe (Dobratsch)“ Gnathotrichus und AT2120000 „Schüttgraschelitzen“ mit 15 Kroneneklektoren (Kreuzfensterfallen), materiarius, Besammeln durch Handfang, Klopfschirm, Kescher und Bodensieb sowie durch das Acanthocinus Eintragen von Totholz. henschi, In Summe wurden in der Schütt 536 Käferspezies – darunter 320 xylobionte – Kiefernblockwald, aus 65 Familien nachgewiesen. Das entspricht knapp einem Fünftel des heimischen Urwaldreliktarten, Artenspektrums an Totholzkäfern. Im Zuge der aktuellen Freilanderhebungen