DOCSLIB.ORG

Croatia Political Briefing: Political Clashing Over the Election of the Supreme Court's President Valentino Petrović

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Croatia Political Briefing: Political Clashing Over the Election of the Supreme Court's President Valentino Petrović ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 39, No. 1 (HR) April 2021 Croatia political briefing: Political Clashing Over the Election of the Supreme Court's President Valentino Petrović 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Political Clashing Over the Election of the Supreme Court's President Summary In this paper, we shall analyze the current judicial crisis that emerged a month ago when President Zoran Milanović decided to support Zlata Đurđević as a candidate for the position of the Supreme Court's president. However, Đurđević was not among those who applied through the official procedure and, therefore, is not considered a candidate. This sprawled a long-lasting feud between the President and the Government, while at the same time, a new corruption affair in the Croatian judiciary occurred. Introduction Last March was far from boring when we are talking about the dynamics of the Croatian political landscape, the interaction between President Zoran Milanović and almost everyone who found the courage to oppose his opinion on the election of the Supreme Courts' new president, and the consequent public debates and accusations on the corruption and clientelism practices in the Croatian judiciary. As we in Croatia all know, the judiciary has been perceived as widely negative as it is; almost every opinion poll conducted recently, or in the last few years, has shown that Croatians do not have trust in the judicial branch of government. The latest events only confirm the image of the judiciary as widely unpopular and prone to scandals. The Origins of the Issue What started as a minor media report in February, covered and placed on the margins of the evening news, eventually gained an impetus to become a first-rate, nationwide topic that revealed much more than what we first expected. However, to introduce everything in the right order, we shall start from the very beginning. In late February, President Milanović was often asked by the media who will be his candidate or his nominee for the position of the President of the Supreme Court. In Croatia, a person who wishes to enter the race for the said position needs to send an official application in a given time span to be considered as a candidate in the first place. The President can, however, nominate his candidate or a person he supports, but also considering an open call mandatory for all candidates. When the names of the candidates 1 who have applied for the position became public, Milanović said that he does not support any of these people and that he will propose a candidate of his own. He commented: “I have been thinking about this for a while, talking about it and trying to keep it discreet. I want to come out in public with my proposal in good time, proposing a person who meets my criteria and who is acceptable to both the ruling majority and the opposition”1. The President also underlined that he does not want to repeat a situation from four years ago when, in his words, the then- incumbent Kolinda Grabar Kitarović had a candidate who did not fit the image that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković had, which resulted in a candidate who was appointed at the last minute2. Unfortunately, this is exactly what happened again, as it was quickly shown that Milanović’s proposal was not met favorably by the ruling Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), which provoked tense relations and various insults between him and the Prime Minister. The Election of a New President of the Supreme Court The first person who decided to counter Milanović was Gordan Jandroković, the Prime Minister’s right hand and the speaker of the Croatian Parliament. Jandroković has a long public feud with Milanović but had to react since he was the first person to decide whether or not Milanović’s proposal is acceptable. However, since the deadline for submitting the applications was over, Jandroković decided to refuse Milanović’s candidate and ask him to resubmit the motion within 15 days, as it is prescribed by Article 170 of the legislature's rule book. Needless to say, Jandroković did not have to wait too long for the President’s response. Milanović claimed that the open call for the position of President of the Supreme Court has not been transparent and that his candidate Zlata Đurđević, a professor at the Faculty of Law in Zagreb, is by far the best candidate among all others, including those who applied for the position according to deadlines. As for Jandroković, Milanović said: "He stole the document I sent to the Parliament and allowed himself to interpret it (…) and assess legality of my recommendation"; after that, he continued: "He or anyone else can do what they want with documents and proposals. That is (ruling party) HDZ's message to Parliament and its partners in the Government (…) and if they want to agree to Jandroković shelving issues at his discretion 1 N.N. 2021. Milanović Soon to Announce Name of His Candidate for Supreme Court President. Total Croatia News https://www.total-croatia-news.com/politics/50758-milanovic-soon-to-announce-name-of-his-candidate-for- supreme-court-president 2 N.N. 2021. Milanović Soon to Announce Name of His Candidate for Supreme Court President. Total Croatia News https://www.total-croatia-news.com/politics/50758-milanovic-soon-to-announce-name-of-his-candidate-for- supreme-court-president 2 and conducting a legislative analysis of a proposal’s admissibility, let them do so. That is the road to tyranny”3. Of course, both sides included in this clash over the candidates and the legality of the procedure have their groundings and are willing to go the distance in their arguments. On the one hand, Milanović claims that open calls, as such, are not open at all, meaning that it is already known in advance who will eventually take the positions. From the realistic perspective, we could agree with the President, especially taking into account the fact that this particular position is concerning judiciary which is, as it is described in the introduction, not very well perceived among the people for its transparency and independence from politics. On the other hand, the Government led by Andrej Plenković is claiming that the President did not follow the rules and that his candidate does not have legality nor legitimacy since Đurđević did not apply to the open call. By late March the Constitutional Court ruled that the President has the authority to propose candidates for the position of the Supreme Court’s president, but only from those applicants who sent their official applications. Normally, this would signal a red light for Milanović not to continue with his agenda, but knowing his character and persistency, he was merely delayed as soon after he said that it is his constitutional right to nominate a candidate. He further decided to criticize the legislature for not questioning Jandroković’s decision on the matter of rejecting his motion regarding Đurđević’s application and for not including it in the parliamentary agenda4. Corruption Accusations Against Osijek Judges Apart from political turmoil created around the election of the Supreme Court’s new president, the Croatian judiciary, in its apparent rightfulness and fairness, has once again been a subject of numerous debates after Zdravko Mamić, the former chief of football club Dinamo Zagreb, accused two judges from the Osijek County Court of corruption, while calling Judge Zvonko Vrban, the president of that very Court, a criminal. Mamić was previously sentenced to six and a half years in prison for siphoning HRK 116 million out of Dinamo Zagreb and 3 N.N. 2021. President Zoran Milanović: "Parliament Speaker Gordan Jandroković Has Done the Impermissible". Total Croatia News https://www.total-croatia-news.com/politics/51351-president-zoran-milanovic-parliament-speaker-gordan- jandrokovic-has-done-the-impermissible 4 N.N. 2021. President Zoran Milanović Due to Pick Supreme Court Chief Justice Nominee From Applicants. Total Croatia News https://www.total-croatia-news.com/politics/51631-president-zoran-milanovic-due-to-pick-supreme-court- chief-justice-nominee-from-applicants 3 defrauding the Croatian state of about HRK 12 million in unpaid taxes5. Moreover, he was closely related to the governing HDZ, especially former President Grabar-Kitarović, who also had to give an official statement on this matter. Mamić is currently in Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and cannot be extradited to Croatia, while he is refusing to come back as he holds dual citizenships. In his efforts to undermine his sentence as well as the Croatian judiciary in general, Mamić leaked personal photos of him associating with the two aforementioned judges and accused them of extortion and taking a bribe. Vrban, who was too mentioned in Mamić’s exposé, said: “It is not normal or appropriate for judges who decide on the fate of other people (…) to associate with that sort of people and to come into contact with those persons outside the courthouse where they will decide on their fate”6. Đuro Sessa, a current president of the Supreme Court, has also apparently been involved in all this, as Mamić claims that he would often, in person, bring money to Sessa’s office to make him change his verdicts. After this, the MPs from the Bridge party (Most) started collecting signatures to initiate Sessa’s removal from the Office. They said: “…the recent events seriously undermine the reputation of and trust in the Croatian judiciary, both the reputation of individual judges and of the judiciary as a whole”7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INTERIM REPORT 31 October – 14 November 2007 I. EXECUTIVE
    OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Parliamentary Elections Croatia 2007 Hotel Westin, 2st floor 1 Krsnjavoga 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Tel: (+385) (1) 6666 800 Fax: (+385) (1) 6666 828 [email protected] INTERIM REPORT 31 October – 14 November 2007 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • On 15 October 2007 President Stjepan Mesi called elections to the Sabor (Croatian Parliament) for 25 November 2007, following the expiration of the 4- year mandates of the representatives elected in November 2003. • The elections are being conducted for the first time by a permanent State Election Commission (SEC) constituted under the 2006 Law on the SEC (amended in 2007). The SEC is not yet operating with a full-time Secretariat, and is depending on staff and premises loaned to it by the Parliament. • Under the new Law on Voter Lists (2007) the system of voter registration has been computerised, which allows for cross-checking and correction of lists. A system is in place to facilitate voters that will not be in their place of permanent residence on polling day. • The campaign to date has been bipolarised and taking place in a generally calm environment, focusing occasionally on personalities rather than the programmes of the two main political parties (the ruling Croatian Democratic Union [HDZ] and the main opposition Social Democratic Party [SDP]). • Efforts to increase access to polling stations for Croatian citizens in Bosnia and Herzegovina have become politicised during the campaign due to the influence that the number of mandates elected in the diaspora constituency may impact on the formation of the next Government. • The electronic and print media are generally covering the election campaign in line with the legal framework and procedures for media coverage of the elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia: Three Elections and a Funeral
    Conflict Studies Research Centre G83 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Three Elections and a Funeral The Dawn of Democracy at the Millennial Turn? Dr Trevor Waters Introduction 2 President Tudjman Laid To Rest 2 Parliamentary Elections 2/3 January 2000 5 • Background & Legislative Framework • Political Parties & the Political Climate • Media, Campaign, Public Opinion Polls and NGOs • Parliamentary Election Results & International Reaction Presidential Elections - 24 January & 7 February 2000 12 Post Tudjman Croatia - A New Course 15 Annex A: House of Representatives Election Results October 1995 Annex B: House of Counties Election Results April 1997 Annex C: Presidential Election Results June 1997 Annex D: House of Representatives Election Results January 2000 Annex E: Presidential Election Results January/February 2000 1 G83 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Three Elections and a Funeral The Dawn of Democracy at the Millennial Turn? Dr Trevor Waters Introduction Croatia's passage into the new millennium was marked by the death, on 10 December 1999, of the self-proclaimed "Father of the Nation", President Dr Franjo Tudjman; by make or break Parliamentary Elections, held on 3 January 2000, which secured the crushing defeat of the former president's ruling Croatian Democratic Union, yielded victory for an alliance of the six mainstream opposition parties, and ushered in a new coalition government strong enough to implement far-reaching reform; and by two rounds, on 24 January and 7 February, of Presidential Elections which resulted in a surprising and spectacular victory for the charismatic Stipe Mesić, Yugoslavia's last president, nonetheless considered by many Croats at the start of the campaign as an outsider, a man from the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia's Parliamentary Elections
    106th CONGRESS Printed for the use of the 2nd Session Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe CROATIAS PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS JANUARY 3, 2000 A Report Prepared by the Staff of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe WASHINGTON:2000 Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe 234 Ford House Office Building Washington, DC 20515-6460 (202) 225-1901 [email protected] http://www.house.gov/csce/ LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, Chairman BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado, Co-Chairman FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas MATT SALMON, Arizona SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania TIM HUTCHINSON, Arkansas STENY H. HOYER, Maryland FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland BOB GRAHAM, Florida LOUISE MCINTOSH SLAUGHTER, New York RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin MICHAEL P. FORBES, New York CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HAROLD HONGJU KOH, Department of State EDWARD L. WARNER III, Department of Defense PATRICK A. MULLOY, Department of Commerce COMMISSION STAFF DOROTHY DOUGLAS TAFT, Chief of Staff RONALD J. MCNAMARA, Deputy Chief of Staff BEN ANDERSON, Communications Director ELIZABETH CAMPBELL, Office Administrator OREST DEYCHAKIWSKY, Staff Advisor JOHN F. FINERTY, Staff Advisor CHADWICK R. GORE, Staff Advisor ROBERT HAND, Staff Advisor JANICE HELWIG, Staff Advisor MARLENE KAUFMANN, Counsel KAREN S. LORD, Counsel for Freedom of Religion MICHELE MADASZ, Staff Assistant/Systems Administrator MICHAEL OCHS, Staff Advisor ERIKA B. SCHLAGER, Counsel for International Law MAUREEN WALSH, General Counsel ii ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION (OSCE) The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki process, traces its origin to the signing of the Helsinki Final Act in Finland on August 1, 1975, by the leaders of 33 European countries, the United States and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Outgoing Head of State Ivo Josipovic Running Favourite in the Croatian Presidential Election
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN CROATIA 28th December 2014 European Elections monitor Outgoing head of State Ivo Josipovic running favourite in the Croatian Presidential election Corinne Deloy Abstract : The President of the Republic of Croatia Ivo Josipovic (Social Democratic Party, SDP) announced on 19th October last that he wanted to run for another term as head of State. He will be facing 3 other candidates on 28th December. His most serious rival is undoubtedly Kolinda Grabar- Analysis Kitarovic, member of the main opposition party, the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) led by Tomislav Karamarko. The presidential election will be test for all of the country’s political parties in view of the general elections planned for the end of 2015. Ivo Josipovic is a popular character amongst his fellow HDZ), is the former European Integration Minister (2003- countrymen but his image may suffer due to the poor 2005), she was then Foreign Affairs and European Inte- economic results of the government led by Zoran Milano- gration (2005-2008), and Ambassador for Croatia in the vic (Social Democratic Party, SPD) and of the weakening US. In 2011 she became the first woman to be appointed of the Social Democrats. Deputy Secretary General of NATO responsible for public The date of the presidential election, which is unusual, can information. She has the support of the Croatian Farmers’ be explained in that in 2009 the Prime Minister Jadranska Party (HSS), the Social Liberal Party (HSLS) and Ruza Kosor (HDZ) decided to organise the presidential election Tomasic, former leader of the Party of Rights-Dr Ante just after Christmas to increase her own party’s chances Starcevic (HSP-AS); of winning, since a great number of expats return home – Milan Kujundzic (Croatian Dawn-People’s Party, HZ), for the holiday period.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Country Report BTI 2006
    Croatia Status Index Management Index (Democracy: 9.10 / Market economy: 8.32) 8.71 6.88 HDI 0.841 Population 4.5 mn GDP per capita ($, PPP) 11.080 Population growth1 0.2 % Unemployment rate2 19.5 Women in Parliament 21.7 % UN Education Index 0.90 Poverty3 4% Gini Index 29.0 (2001) Source: UNDP: Human Development Report 2005. Figures for 2003 unless otherwise indicated. 1Annual Growth between 1975 and 2003. 2International Labour Office, average registered unemployment in 2003. 3Population living below $ 1 (1990- 2003). A. Executive summary Having suffered a serious transformation crisis, war and political isolation in the 1990s, Croatia has rapidly advanced political and economic transformation since January 2000 with success. This dynamic was brought about by political change marked by the end of Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) rule. The HDZ had ruled since independence. The commitment to democracy and market economy then underlined has begun again since the re-election of the reformed HDZ in 2003. The realization of these parliamentary elections and the manner in which successive government change was conducted indicate further development in Croatia’s democratic structures. Improvements in state capacity, political participation and the rule of law underscore this development. While the judiciary operates relatively independently, it is partially limited in carrying out its functions. Improvements are needed, particularly with regard to procedural rationalization and the administration of justice. Because the judicial system’s budget has been increasing since 2003 in the course of adopting EU-standards, the number of untreated cases is likely to decline and the fight against corruption reinforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Briefing Here
    THE KEY PRIORITIES OF THE CROATIAN PRESIDENCY OF THE EU A Strong Europe in a World of Challenges: The Key Priorities of the Croatian Presidency of the EU By Clare Gray n 1 January 2020, Croatia assumed its first rotating The beginning of the Croatian Presidency was also marked by OPresidency of the Council of the European Union, a national political change, following the election of opposition position it will hold for six months until 30 June 2020. To candidate, Zoran Milanović, as President of Croatia. Mr mark the occasion, the President of the European Council, Milanović, a member of the Social Democratic party, secured Charles Michel, and the College of Commissioners, travelled to victory over the incumbent Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović, a member the Croatian capital of Zagreb from 8-10 January 2020. As the of the governing Croatian Democratic Union. most recent EU Member State and one of the smallest, holding the Presidency gives Croatia the opportunity to coordinate the The motto of the Croatian Presidency, “A Strong Europe in a legislative activities of the Council. World of Challenges”, encapsulates the complex backdrop against which Croatia accedes to the Presidency, while also expressing Croatia takes up the Presidency against a complex political and confidence in the EU’s strengths and capacity for unity in institutional backdrop. The new EU institutions and leaders are overcoming these challenges and responding to the needs of EU now all in office and Croatia will have to work quickly to forge citizens. productive working relationships between the key institutions. In addition, new policy priorities have emerged such as the The Presidency of the Council of the EU European Green Deal and the digital transformation, while old challenges persist such as migration, security and uneven The Presidency of the Council of the European Union rotates economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Political Briefing: the Beginning of Zoran Milanović's
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 27, No. 1 (HR) March 2020 Croatia political briefing: The Beginning of Zoran Milanović’s Presidency and Relationship with Andrej Plenković Valentino Petrović 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 The Beginning of Zoran Milanović’s Presidency and Relationship with Andrej Plenković Summary After Zoran Milanović’s victory over Kolinda Grabar Kitarović in the second round of presidential elections in January this year, the media and public started discussing on his upcoming relationship with current Prime Minister and president of Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), Andrej Plenković. When looking into their resumes, we can notice a lot of similarities, especially with their education and diplomatic background. Today, they are often perceived as rivals and after Milanović had been elected on a presidential duty, Plenković called for a “strong” cohabitation. In this article, we will analyze that very term and provide with overview of Milanović’s first moves as a new president. Introduction With Zoran Milanović being elected as a new Croatian president in January this year, a lot of questions have been raised regarding his upcoming cooperation with the current Prime Minister, Andrej Plenković. Since his victory on the presidential election, Milanović has expressed quite a few times his willingness and, most of all, his obligation to follow the rules and procedures of presidential duty and he underlined several times that he will not interfere in the work of the other part of the executive branch, that being the Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Presidents in Croatia and Serbia, 1990-2015
    The Role of Presidents in Croatia and Serbia, 1990-2015 By: Mislav Ilija Vulić Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Zsolt Enyedi CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary (2015) Abstract Both Croatia and Serbia introduced a semi-presidential system of government in 1990. In Croatia this choice was motivated by a need to have a decisive and efficient decision- making institution in light of the upcoming instability and war. In Serbia introduction of semi- presidentialism was motivated primarily by the need of Slobodan Milošević to be legitimized as a national leader. Croatian semi-presidentialism in 1990s was of a presidential- parliamentary subtype because the President had autonomous power to appoint and dismiss the Government. Serbian semi-presidentialism was of a premier-presidential subtype because the Government was accountable solely to the Assembly. In both countries tendencies towards authoritarianism emerged. The death of Franjo Tuđman and the resignation of Slobodan Milošević ended the authoritarian rule but the two countries diverged in how they dealt with the institutional framework of semi-presidentialism. In Croatia the Constitution was amended immediately after the change of government. In Serbia it remains the same even today with only minor alterations. The present system of government in Croatia can be characterized as parliamentary while system of government in Serbia can be characterized as semi-presidential. The key difference does not emerge from constitutional powers but from the fact that Croatian President is forbidden to be a member of the political party or its president, while in Serbia this possibility exists, and can be used to position the President as a central figure in the political system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shifting Political Scene in Croatia
    CHANGE IN THE OFFING: THE SHIFTING POLITICAL SCENE IN CROATIA ICG Balkans Report N°50 Zagreb-Sarajevo, 14 December 1998 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ I I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 1 II. A WARTIME AGENDA...................................................................................... 2 III. SHIFT TO THE RIGHT...................................................................................... 5 A. THE INTOLERANT HDZ................................................................................... 5 B. INTRA-HDZ DIVISIONS ................................................................................... 6 C. THE BATTLE FOR THE DEFENCE MINISTRY ....................................................... 7 D. MANIPULATION OF THE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES .............................................. 9 E. THE RIGHT TRIUMPHANT .............................................................................. 11 IV. CHANGE IN THE OFFING.............................................................................. 12 A. THE OPPOSITION RESURGENT...................................................................... 12 B. SOCIAL DISCONTENT ................................................................................... 14 C. WORN-OUT HDZ MODERATES ..................................................................... 15 D. OPPOSITION APPROACH..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia: Accession Negotiations with the EU Overshadowed by Parliamentary Elections
    OswcOMMentary issue 48 | 29.02.2011 | ceNTRe fOR eAsTeRN sTudies Croatia: accession negotiations with the EU overshadowed by parliamentary elections NTARy Me Marta Szpala ces cOM In 2011 Croatia entered the final stage of its accession negotiations with the EU. The completion of these negotiations will probably coincide with the parliamentary elections which should be held in November or December tudies this year. The elections are likely to bring about a change of government, s as public support for Jadranka Kosor's cabinet and her party, the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has been declining; the left-wing opposition is astern likely to take power. Therefore, the government’s main goal is to complete e the accession negotiations in the first half of the year, in order to sign the accession treaty and hold the EU membership referendum before the par- liamentary elections. The HDZ believes that only the successful completion entre for c of the accession negotiations could increase its chances of a good result in the upcoming elections. At the same time, fearing a further fall in support, the government will avoid any decisions and reforms that would be contro- versial for the public, especially in the sphere of the economy; such deci- NTARy sions could also increase Euroscepticism among the Croatian public, and Me result in the rejection of EU accession in the referendum. The government in Zagreb hopes that the currently implemented anti-corruption strategy and reform of the judiciary, as well as the advanced process of adaptation ces cOM to EU conditions, will be enough to complete the negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ongoing Coalition Negotiations on New Government in Croatia Parliamentary Elections Took Place in Croatia on 23 November
    Ongoing coalition negotiations on new government in Croatia Parliamentary elections took place in Croatia on 23 November. The centre-right Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) garnished the largest number of parliamentary seats and has subsequently initiated negotiations on the formation of a new coalition government. President Stjepan Mesic announced that he would likely name the HDZ President, Dr. Ivo Sanader, as the Prime Minister Designate following the publication of the official election results by the State Election Commission. The first session of the new Parliament must be held within 20 days after the election results are officially announced. Coalition negotiations to establish a new government are expected to last at least until that time. At present, the HDZ seems to have the support for an HDZ-led government with a block of 76 seats in the 152-seat Parliament. Sixty-two HDZ Members of Parliament (MPs) will sit in the new Parliament while the HDZ will also nominate four diaspora representatives by way of securing almost 60 per cent of the total diaspora vote. The HDZ agreed to discuss a joint coalition with the centre-right Croatian Social Liberal Party (HSLS) and the Democratic Centre (DC), which together won three seats. The Croatian Pensioners Party (HSU) and the Croatian Democratic Peasants Party (HDSS), which secured three seats and one seat, respectively, have officially offered their support to an HDZ-led government. The HDZ has also received signed statements of support from three of the eight minority MPs, namely the Hungarian MP, the Bosniak MP, who also represents four other official national minorities, and the German MP who also represents 11 other minorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Jumping Hurdles Croatia Continues EU Membership Bid
    POLICY Jumping Hurdles Croatia Continues EU Membership Bid Marko Papic, Stratfor Global Intelligence Croatia continues its progress through the European Union accession process, despite an ongoing border dispute with neighboring Slovenia. Overcoming hurdles is not uncommon in the process and Croatia now expects to enter the union by 2011. Slovenian Prime Minister Borut Pahor said in September not legally prejudge the dispute it has with Slovenia. This 2009 that his country would stop blocking Croatia’s mem- essentially satisfied Slovenia’s demand to force Croatia not bership talks with the union. Slovenia’s previous actions to use the EU accession process as a way to make a claim were due to a border dispute between the two former on the border dispute. Yugoslav republics. With Croatia succumbing to Slovenian pressure, the The dispute concerns pockets of land along the Adri- Croatian accession process to the EU can now continue. atic Sea that could play an important role in determining Croatia’s entry into the union will most likely be the last access to the sea. Croatian Prime Minister Jadranka Kosor, one before 2013, when the current six-year EU budget according to reports, sent an official statement to her ends. Because of Croatian-German ties, Croatia’s acces- Swedish counterpart — who held the rotating EU presi- sion will be a boost for Germany under the new decision- dency until December 2009 — affirming that any mention making rules dictated by the Lisbon Treaty. However, the of Croatia’s borders in its EU application materials does Slovenian-Croatian dispute will spell trouble for subse- quent Balkan entries, particularly if Croatia decides to play the same role as Slovenia in threatening to blackball its eastern neighbors.
    [Show full text]