DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities November 2017 Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities s e i t i t n E d e z i S - FRF m for u i d e M d n a SMEs - ll aicpa.org/FRF-SMEs a m S F r i o na f n rk ci o al R ew eporting Fram ™ iii Notice to Readers Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities was developed by a task force of CPA practitioners and professionals serv- ing and working at small- and medium-sized entities and the staff of the AICPA. Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Enti- ties has not been approved, disapproved, or otherwise acted upon by any tech- nical committee of the AICPA or the Financial Accounting Standards Board and has no official or authoritative status. AICPA FRF for SMEs Task Force (2012–2013) David Morgan, Chair Marc Parkinson Theresa Bible Pat Piteo DeAnn Hill Thomas A. Ratcliffe Karen Kerber Eric P. Wallace Kenneth R. Odom AICPA Staff Charles E. Landes Vice President Professional Standards and Services Robert Durak Director, Private Company Financial Reporting Accounting Standards Daniel Noll Director Accounting Standards FRF-SME v Preface About Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities The FRF for SMEsTM accounting framework has been developed by the AICPA FRF for SMEs Task Force (task force) and the staff of the AICPA as a special purpose framework for small- and medium-sized entities. It is a self-contained financial reporting framework not based on account- ing principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Special purpose frameworks, with the exception of the contractual basis of accounting, are commonly referred to as other comprehensive bases of accounting or OCBOA. Special purpose frameworks include cash basis, modified cash basis, tax basis, regulatory basis, contractual basis, and other non-GAAP bases of accounting that utilize a definite set of logical, reasonable criteria that is applied to all material items appearing in the financial statements. The FRF for SMEs accounting framework draws upon a blend of tradition- al accounting principles and accrual income tax methods of accounting. It utilizes historical cost as its primary measurement basis. In addition, it provides management with a suitable degree of optionality when choosing accounting policies to better meet the needs of the end users of the finan- cial statements. The framework eschews prescriptive, detailed standards and voluminous disclosure requirements. Being a more intuitive and un- derstandable framework for small business owners and the users of their financial statements, the framework lays out principles that encourage the use of professional judgment in the particular circumstances of a transac- tion or event. The FRF for SMEs reporting option is a cost-beneficial solution for man- agement, owners, and others who require financial statements that are prepared in a consistent and reliable manner in accordance with a non- GAAP framework that has undergone public comment and profession- al scrutiny. The accounting principles comprising it are appropriate for the preparation of small- and medium-sized entity financial statements, based on the needs of the financial statement users and cost and benefit considerations. The task force that developed the FRF for SMEs accounting framework with AICPA staff consisted of professionals who have an abundance of ex- perience serving smaller- to medium-sized entities. The task force and staff believe that the FRF for SMEs accounting framework is criteria suitable for the preparation of general use finan- cial statements and external use of the statements in situations that do not require GAAP financial statements. As such, the framework has the following attributes: s Objectivity. The framework is free from bias. s Measurability. The framework permits reasonably consistent mea- surements. s Completeness. The framework is sufficiently complete so that those relevant factors that would alter a conclusion about the financial statements are not omitted. s Relevance. The framework is relevant to financial statement users. FRF-SME vi Scope and Characteristics of Entities Utilizing the FRF for SMEs Accounting Framework The FRF for SMEs accounting framework has been developed for small- to medium-sized entities that require reliable non-GAAP financial state- ments for internal use and external uses. The task force believes that this framework can be used by entities in many industry groups and may also be used by unincorporated, as well as incorporated, entities. The frame- work is not intended to be a substitute for GAAP when GAAP-based fi- nancial statements are necessary, as determined by the management of a private company and its financial statement users. A standard definition of small- and medium-sized entities does not exist in the United States. However, the term is intuitive, widely recognized, and effectively descriptive of the scope of entities for which the FRF for SMEs accounting framework is intended. The task force and staff deliberately did not develop quantified size criteria for determining what is a small- and medium-sized entity because they decided that developing quantified size tests is not feasible and not an effective way of describing the kinds of entities for which the framework is intended. Rather, characteristics of typical entities that may utilize the framework are presented in the follow- ing text. These characteristics are not all-inclusive and are not presented as a list of required characteristics an entity must possess in order to uti- lize the framework. The AICPA has no authority to prevent or require the use of a special purpose framework like the FRF for SMEs accounting framework. These characteristics are presented as helpful guidelines for management and other stakeholders when determining the appropriate- ness and suitability of the FRF for SMEs accounting framework in the preparation of financial statements. Ultimately, the decision regarding which accounting framework best meets an entity’s financial reporting needs rests with management. The FRF for SMEs accounting framework should only be used if the resulting financial statements are intended to be consistent with the concepts, principles, and criteria described in chap- ter 1, “Financial Statement Concepts,” of Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities. Certain Characteristics of Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Utilizing the FRF for SMEs Accounting Framework This list presents certain characteristics of typical entities that may uti- lize the FRF for SMEs accounting framework. As stated previously, these characteristics are not all-inclusive and not presented as a list of required characteristics an entity must possess in order to utilize it: s The entity does not have regulatory reporting requirements that es- sentially require it to use GAAP-based financial statements. s A majority of the owners and management of the entity have no in- tention of going public. s The entity is for-profit. s The entity may be owner-managed, which is a closely held company in which the people who own a controlling ownership interest in the entity are substantially the same set of people who run the company. s Management and owners of the entity rely on a set of financial state- ments to confirm their assessments of performance, cash flows, and of what they own and what they owe. FRF-SME vii s The entity does not operate in an industry in which the entity is involved in transactions that require highly-specialized accounting guidance, such as financial institutions and governmental entities. s The entity does not engage in overly complicated transactions. s The entity does not have significant foreign operations. s Key users of the entity’s financial statements have direct access to the entity’s management. s Users of the entity’s financial statements may have greater interest in cash flows, liquidity, statement of financial position strength, and interest coverage. s The entity’s financial statements support applications for bank fi- nancing when the banker does not base a lending decision solely on the financial statements but also on available collateral or other evaluation mechanisms not directly related to the financial state- ments. Application of FRF for SMEs Accounting Framework Principles, Concepts, and Criteria The task force and AICPA staff have developed the FRF for SMEs account- ing framework to address transactions that are typically encountered by private, for-profit, small-, and medium-sized entities. If the framework does not specifically address a transaction, other event, or condition, manage- ment should use its judgment and apply the general principles, concepts, and criteria contained in the framework when developing accounting poli- cies. The development and application of those policies should result in financial information that is intended to be consistent with the financial statement concepts described in chapter 1 of Financial Reporting Frame- work for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities. Authority and Effective Date of the FRF for SMEs Accounting Framework The AICPA has no authority to require the use of the FRF for SMEs ac- counting framework for any entity. Therefore, use of the framework is purely optional. Management that prepares an entity’s financial state- ments in accordance with the framework may represent or assert that such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the AICPA’s FRF for SMEs accounting framework, a special purpose frame- work. Because use of the framework is optional, there is no effective date for its implementation. Maintenance of the FRF for SMEs Accounting Framework Appreciating the limited accounting resources that typical entities utiliz- ing the FRF for SMEs accounting framework have, as well as the nature of their financial reporting, the framework is intended to be a stable platform that does not undergo frequent amending or updating. At the same time, it is intended to be responsive to the financial reporting needs of small- and medium-sized entities and, therefore, will be modified in response to significant developments in accounting and financial reporting matters af- fecting those entities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Business Overhead Expense Disability Insurance Plan
    A benefit of your membership! INSURANCE SPECIALISTS, INC. BUSINESS OVERHEAD EXPENSE DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN Affordable Business Overhead Expense Disability Insurance, designed for small professional practices. 0188490 INSURANCE SPECIALISTS, INC. BUSINESS OVERHEAD EXPENSE DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN Peace of mind for you and your practice Whether you are just starting your own professional practice or growing the one you already have, you know how fast your financial obligations can add up. Employee salaries and insurance premiums, rent, utilities, real estate taxes, are just some of your regular monthly practice expenses. How would you cover those expenses if you were disabled and couldn’t work for months? How long could your business survive if you weren’t there practicing? The Business Overhead Expense Disability Insurance (BOE) Plan can help keep your practice open and viable during periods of disability. Whether you return after a disability or choose to sell your practice, its marketable value can remain intact with good business overhead insurance available to you. If you become disabled, the Plan reimburses you for your regular monthly business expenses. Separate from your disability income insurance coverage that protects the money you earn, BOE coverage could make the difference between keeping the doors of your practice open during a disability and having to close it permanently. The Business Overhead Expense Disability Insurance Plan offers: Apply today for this • Up to $20,000 of monthly coverage for eligible business expenses. important coverage! Go to www.isi1959.com and download a • Coverage for disability for up to 24 months Request for Coverage Form from our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Accounting Standard on “Overheads”
    COST ACCOUNTING STANDARD ON “OVERHEADS” The following is the text of the COST ACCOUNTING STANDARD 3 (CAS- 3) issued by the Council of the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India on “Overheads”. The standard deals with the method of collection, allocation, apportionment and absorption of overheads” In this Standard, the standard portions have been set in bold italic type. These should be read in the context of the background material which has been set in normal type. 1. Introduction 1.1 In Cost Accounting the analysis and collection of overheads, their allocation and apportionment to different cost centres and absorption to products or services plays an important role in determination of cost as well as control purposes. A system of better distribution of overheads can only ensure greater accuracy in determination of cost of products or services. It is, therefore, necessary to follow standard practices for allocation, apportionment and absorption of overheads for preparation of cost statements. 2. Objective 2.1 The standard is to prescribe the methods of collection, allocation, apportionment of overheads to different cost centres and absorption thereof to products or services on a consistent and uniform basis in the preparation of cost statements and to facilitate inter-firm and intra-firm comparison. 2.2 The standardization of collection, allocation, apportionment and absorption of overheads is to provide a scientific basis for determination of cost of different activities, products, services, assets, etc. 2.3 The standard is to facilitate in taking commercial and strategic management ` decisions such as resource allocation, product mix optimization, make or buy decisions, price fixation etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Overhead Expense Worksheet
    Business Overhead Expense Worksheet When completing this worksheet, keep in mind that as a general rule, if a regular and normal business expense incurred in the operation of the proposed insured business owner’s office or place of business will continue (because of contractual obligations or the necessity of the expense for maintenance) after that person becomes disable, that expense will most likely be covered. However, if the expense is income-generating, is for a new capital improvement or increases the net worth of the business, it most likely will not be covered. Type of Business Normal Monthly Type of Business Normal Monthly Overhead Expense Outlay Overhead Expense Outlay 1. Rental Real Estate Depreciation, or 8. Professional license & dues $ Business Mortgage Principal 9. Business-related loan interest (show only one) $ including business-related mortgage 2. Utilities interest $ a. Heat $ 10. Replacement salary (calculated as b. Power $ the lesser of 50% of the proposed insured business owner’s salary or c. Water/Sewer $ 50% of all other eligible expenses) $ d. Fixed Telephone/Fax $ 11. Either business-related depreciation 3. Compensation of employees or payment on loan principal (show (including members of the proposed one or the other but not both) $ insured owner’s immediate family who have been continuously 12. Car, truck & equipment leases (any employed by the business for at least portion of lease which is for personal usage is not covered) 90 days) $ NOTE: Compensation to partners is 13. Telephone answering service and/or not covered in overhead expense. $ mobile paging system $ 4. Business related taxes (only those 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Comparisons of the FRF for Smestm Reporting
    Private Companies Practice Section March 2018 Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Comparisons of the FRF for SMEsTM Reporting Framework to Other Bases of Accounting s e i t i t n E d e z i S FRF - for m u i d e M d SMEs n a - ll aicpa.org/FRF-SMEs a m S F r i o na f n rk ci o al R ew eporting Fram ™ Comparisons of the FRF for SMEs Reporting Framework to Other Bases of Accounting Introduction Owner-managers of SMEs, CPAs serving SMEs, users of SME financial statements, and other stakeholders are often familiar with the tax basis of accounting and U.S. GAAP. Also, many stakeholders are following the implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standard for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs) around the world as its use continues to expand and its implications for the U.S. marketplace continue to grow. As such, these stakeholders are interested in understanding how the principles and criteria included in the FRF for SMEs accounting framework compare to those other bases of accounting. To assist those stakeholders, comparisons of the FRF for SMEs accounting framework to (1) the tax basis, (2) U.S. GAAP, and (3) IFRS for SMEs are presented on the following pages. These comparisons are not all inclusive. Rather, the following comparisons are made at a high level and are intended to draw attention to differences between the FRF for SMEs accounting framework and the other bases of accounting on certain accounting and financial reporting matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Absorption Costing - Overview
    Absorption Costing - Overview 1. Overview of Absorption costing and Variable Costing 2. Review how costs for Manufacturing are transferred to the product 3. Job Order Vs. Process Costing 4. Overhead Application - Under applied Overhead - Over applied overhead 5. Problems with Absorption Costing 6. Concluding Comments Absorption Costing The focus of this class is on how to allocate manufacturing costs to the product. - Direct Materials - Direct Labor - Overhead Absorption costing is a process of tracing the variable costs of production and the fixed costs of production to the product. Variable Costing traces only the variable costs of production to the product and the fixed costs of production are treated as period expenses. Absorption Costing There are three different types of Absorption Costing Systems: - Job Order Costing - Process Costing - ABC Costing In Job Order Costing costs are assigned to the product in Batches or lots. - Printing - Furniture manufacturing - Bicycle Manufacturing In Process Costing, costs are systematically assigned to the product, since there are no discreet batches to assign costs. - Oil Distilling - Soda Manufacturing ABC Costing assigns cost from cost centers to the product - Best in a multi product firm, where there are different volumes Absorption Costing A simplified view of Production: Introduce Raw Manufacture Store finished Sell Finished Materials Product goods Goods 1. Direct materials 1. Direct labor 1. Production process are purchased applied to completed 2. Direct materials product 2. Goods are shipped are placed into 2. Overhead costs for sale production are incurred Absorption Costing How do we account for the production process? 1. Direct materials are purchased and recorded as an asset.
    [Show full text]
  • Example: Accounting in a Job Order Costing System
    ACCT 102 - Professor Johnson Lecture Notes – Chapter 17: ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING AND ANALYSIS ASSIGNING OVERHEAD COSTS Background In Chapter 14, we learned that product costs consist of direct materials, direct labor, and factory overhead. We also understood that direct materials are assigned to product costs via the materials requisition form, and direct labor is allocated to product costs using time tickets. Direct material and direct labor costs are easily traceable to these source documents, so accuracy in assigning these costs is not difficult to achieve. However, factory overhead cannot be allocated to products using source documents. We must use an allocation system to assign overhead costs, such as factory maintenance and factory supervisors’ salaries, to products. As factories become more and more mechanized, factory overhead becomes a larger portion of product costs. As a result, assigning factory overhead to individual products manufactured becomes more important. This chapter introduces three methods of allocating overhead: 1. The single plantwide overhead rate method 2. The departmental overhead rate method 3. The activity-based costing (“ABC”) method. Why is this important? Most companies produce more than one product. An important managerial accounting function is to accurately allocate direct materials, direct labor, and factory overhead costs to each product so that the cost of each product is available. Management can then determine the gross profit per product, and use this cost data to set appropriate selling prices for each product. If the product costs are not allocated accurately, the gross profit for each product will be incorrect, and management may set inappropriate selling prices. Plantwide Overhead Rate Method The plantwide overhead rate method is practical when (1) overhead costs are closely related to production volume, or (2) a company produces only one product.
    [Show full text]
  • Job-Order Costing; T-Accounts; Income Statement
    JOB-ORDER COSTING 1 Job-order Costing; T-Accounts; Income Statement Gold Nest Company is a family-owned enterprise that makes birdcages in Chinatown. A popular pastime among older Chinese men is to take their pet birds on daily excursions to teahouses and public parks. The birdcages are often elaborately constructed from exotic woods and contain porcelain feeding bowls and silver roosts. Gold Nest Company makes a broad range of birdcages that it sells through an extensive network of street vendors who receive commissions on their sales. All the company’s transactions with customers, employees, and suppliers are conducted in cash; there is no credit. The company uses a job-order costing system in which overhead is applied to jobs on the basis of direct labor cost. At the beginning of the year, it was estimated that the total direct labor cost for the year would be $200,000 and the total manufacturing overhead cost would be $330,000. At the beginning of the year, the inventory balances were as follows: Raw Materials ……………….…. $25,000 Work in Process ………..…….. 10,000 Finished Goods …………..…… 40,000 During the year, the following transactions were completed: a. Raw materials purchased for cash, $275,000. b. Raw materials requisitioned for use in production, $280,000 (materials costing $220,000 were charged directly to jobs; the remaining mater ilials were idiindirec t). c. Costs for employee services were incurred as follows: Direct labor …………….….… $180,000 Indirect labor ………..………….. 72,000 Sales commissions ……......….. 63,000 Administrative salaries..……..... 90,000 2 d. Rent for the year was $18,000 ($13,000 of this amount related to factory operations, and the remainder related to selling administrative activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Joint Costs, General Farm Overhead, and Rights to Produce
    CHAPTER 9 JOINT COSTS, GENERAL FARM OVERHEAD, AND RIGHTS TO PRODUCE JOINT COSTS Definitions Joint production costs have been defined in the economic literature as costs that "are incurred on groups of products rather than on individual and separate ones” (Hopkins and Taylor: 404). At least three different situations give rise to joint costs. These include (1) expenses incurred in the production of joint products (defined as technically interdependent commodities arising from a joint technology), (2) expenses for inputs that affect the production of more than one enterprise (independent but organizationally related commodities) even if the production technologies are non-joint, and (3) outlays for production inputs that are either purchased for the farm as a whole or are used for the entire set of production activities undertaken by the farm. The second category is best exemplified by the allocation of capital inputs (and/or their services) or fixed expendable inputs to different enterprises. For example, the total amount of fertilizer applied by the firm is usually divided among several different crops. Or the total number of tractor hours is divided between crop and livestock operations. The third category is usually referred to as general farm or business overhead and typically includes items for which it is difficult or impossible to determine the impact of the input on either output or cost for a specific enterprise. For example, it is difficult to determine the impact of buying a new set of Allen wrenches on the average corn yield per acre or the impact of attending pesticide applicator training on cucumber gross returns.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study - Overhead Costs Analysis
    CASE STUDY - OVERHEAD COSTS ANALYSIS Yong-Woo Kim1 and Glenn Ballard2 ABSTRACT Construction projects become complicated and fragmented so that many specialty contractors are involved. In such changed environments, a general contractor’s overhead costs are increasing comparable to direct costs. In addition to an increase of volume, activities consisting of overhead costs play an important role in coordinating different participants who include different specialty contractors and client. This paper reviews traditional overhead control and critiques problems thereof through literature review, interviews with professionals, and data collection. It proposes a new overhead cost control method, called profit-point analysis (PPA) applying activity- based costing (ABC). It is followed by a case study presented to exemplify the new method. KEY WORDS Construction overhead costs, activity-based costing (ABC), profit point analysis (PPA), nurturing relationship 1 Ph. D. Candidate at University of California at Berkeley, [email protected] 2 Research Director at Lean Construction Institute (LCI) and Associate Adjunct Professor at University of California at Berkeley, [email protected] Proceedings IGLC-10, Aug. 2002, Gramado, Brazil Yong-Woo Kim and Glenn Ballard 2 INTRODUCTION Construction projects become complicated and fragmented so that many specialty contractors are involved. In such altered environments, a general contractor’s overhead costs increase comparable to direct costs. In addition to the increase of volume, activities contributed to overhead costs play an important role in coordinating different participants that include different specialty contractors and client. However, the construction industry has not changed the method of controlling overhead costs in construction projects. Traditionally, construction overhead uses resource-based costing and volume-based allocation (Kim and Ballard 2001, Holland and Hobson 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is This Thing Called Overhead?
    THE MANAGEMENT SERIES What I s T his Thing C alled O verhead? by GERALD GERMAIN Copyright 2000 Reprinted March 2002 Germain Consulting, Inc. About the Author A well-known member of the advertising agency financial community, Gerald (Gerry) Germain, president of Germain Consulting Inc., has par- ticipated as an innovator in a number of important industry trends, includ- ing the emergence of performance-based compensation arrangements, the design of new employee-compensation methods, and the consolidation of mid-sized agencies in large worldwide- service groups. He has also con- tributed to the overall financial philosophy of the industry, working through both his individual positions and the major associations in the industry. Mr. Germain entered the industry in 1967, after earning a J.D. Degree from New York University Law School. He started as a staff accountant at the agency now known as D’Arcy. After rising through the ranks to senior vice president worldwide treasurer, he moved to Compton Communications, Inc. (now Saatchi & Saatchi Worldwide) in 1978 as its chief financial officer, becoming an executive vice president as well in 1982. In 1984, he became chief financial officer of Doyle, Dane, Bernbach, now DDB. When he left in 1994 to establish his own consult- ing practice, he was vice chairman of the company. His clients include both large and small agencies. Mr. Germain has held a number of key industry-wide positions including chairman of the AAAA Fiscal Control Committee, member of the Board of Directors of the AAAA Workers' Compensation Program, chairman of the Advertising Agency Financial Management Group, and director and treasurer of the Advertising Research Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Holistic Financial Planning
    Holistic Financial Planning: Planning for Financial Success Key Outcomes You will learn: 9 steps to Financial Success The difference between bookkeeping, financial planning, and accounting. How to create a Net Worth Statement How to create a budget or cash forecast Key testing questions for effective Financial Planning How to create profit How to develop Gross Profit /Enterprise Analysis budgets How to prioritize expenses How to plan strategically for investments How to monitor a financial plan If managing livestock, how to coordinate the build up of both livestock and infrastructure while remaining profitable Introduction …………………………………………….. 3 Business Management Basics (Management Inventory & Goal Setting) ……………… 4 9 Steps to Financial Success Overview ……………………………………………..….. 6 Financial Basics Aligning Financial Planning with Your Values ……………………………………….. 8 Financial Planning, Management, and Accounting………………………………...……. 9 What is Profit? ……………………………………………………………………….. 10 Preliminary Planning Steps Planning Forms ……………………………………………………………………... 11 Identify the Financial Planning Team ……………………………………………... 12 Create the Financial Planning Schedule ……………………………………………….. …... 13 9 Steps to Financial Planning Step 1. Annual Review— Logjam …………………………………………………………... 14 Step 1. Annual Review—Adverse Factors……………………………………………. …... 15 Step 2. Assess Beginning Net Worth …………………………………………………..…... 16 Step 3. Plan Income—Enterprise Analysis …………………………………………….….. 17 Step 3. Plan Income—Brainstorm New Enterprises ……………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Classification of Manufacturing Costs and Expenses
    Management Accounting | 51 Classification of Manufacturing Costs and Expenses Introduction Management accounting, as previously explained, consists primarily of planning, performance evaluation, and decision‑making models useful to management in making better decisions. In every case, these tools require cost and revenue infor‑ mation. A basic assumption of management accounting is that it is the responsibility of the management accountant to provide the needed cost and revenue information. Consequently, the management accountant needs a complete understanding of the different types of costs required by the various models. In Figure 4.1, the major costs associated with each management accounting tool is listed. In management accounting, as in financial accounting, it may be said that a major building block in the conceptual foundation is cost. Both the financial and manage‑ ment accountant must have a sound understanding of the varied and complex rami‑ fications of cost. From a financial accounting viewpoint, a faulty understanding of cost may cause financial statements to be incorrectly prepared. From a management accounting viewpoint, an inadequate understanding or use of costs will result in poor decisions. There are two broad aspect of the term cost that needs to be understood: cost classification and cost behavior. Cost classification refers to the separation of costs into categories for proper preparation of financial statements or for use in deci‑ sion‑making models. Cost behavior refers to the effect that volume (production or sales ) has on total expenses or costs. In this chapter, both aspects will be discussed in some depth. 52 | CHAPTER FOUR • Classification of Manufacturing Costs and Expenses Cost Classification In accounting, the term cost refers to the expenditure or sacrifice made to acquire something of value.
    [Show full text]