October 17, 2017

TO: Members of the MAG Regional Council

FROM: Mayor Jackie Meck, Buckeye, Chair

SUBJECT: MEETING NOTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL OF TENTATIVE AGENDA

Meeting - 11:30 a.m. Wednesday, October 25, 2017 MAG Office, Suite 200 - Saguaro Room 302 North 1st Avenue, Phoenix

The next MAG Regional Council meeting will be held at the MAG offices at the time and place noted above. Members of the Regional Council may attend either in person, by videoconference or by telephone conference call. Members who wish to remove any items from the Consent Agenda are requested to contact the MAG office. Supporting information is enclosed for your review. The meeting will include a working lunch.

Please park in the garage underneath the building. Bring your ticket to the meeting, parking will be validated. For those using transit, the Regional Public Transportation Authority will provide transit tickets for your trip. For those using bicycles, please lock your bicycle in the bike rack in the garage.

Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), MAG does not discriminate on the basis of disability in admissions to or participation in its public meetings. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation, such as a sign language interpreter, by contacting Valerie Day at the MAG office. Requests should be made as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation. Assisted listening devices are available from MAG staff at the meeting. If you have any questions, please call the MAG Office. c: MAG Management Committee MAG REGIONAL COUNCIL TENTATIVE AGENDA October 25, 2017

COMMITTEE ACTION REQUESTED

1. Call to Order

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Call to the Audience 3. Information.

An opportunity will be provided to members of the public to address the Regional Council on items that are not on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of MAG, or on items on the agenda for discussion but not for action. Citizens will be requested not to exceed a three minute time period for their comments. A total of 15 minutes will be provided for the Call to the Audience agenda item, unless the Regional Council requests an exception to this limit. Please note that those wishing to comment on agenda items posted for action will be provided the opportunity at the time the item is heard.

4. Executive Director’s Report 4. Information.

The MAG Executive Director will provide a report to the Regional Council on activities of general interest.

5. Approval of Consent Agenda 5. Approval of the Consent Agenda.

Council members may request that an item be removed from the consent agenda. Prior to action on the consent agenda, members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to comment on consent items. Consent items are marked with an asterisk (*).

ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONSENT*

*5A. Approval of the September 27, 2017, Meeting 5A. Review and approval of the September 27, 2017, Minutes meeting minutes.

2 MAG Regional Council -- Tentative Agenda October 25, 2017

*5B. Proposed Name Change From the MAG Bicycle 5B. Approval of changing the name of the MAG and Pedestrian Committee to the MAG Active Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee to the MAG Transportation Committee Active Transportation Committee.

On September 19, 2017, the MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee voted to recommend changing its name to the MAG Active Transportation Committee. The committee recognizes the trend around the country, and around the world, in moving to a more holistic approach to planning bicycle and pedestrian facilities and how they connect to transit, shared spaces and open spaces. The committee also recognizes, as does the U.S Department of Transportation, the important connection between Active Transportation and public health. To this end, the committee has chosen to recommend the name change to reflect the evolving nature of Active Transportation planning. On October 11, 2017, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval to change the committee name to the MAG Active Transportation Committee. Please refer to the enclosed material.

*5C. Project Changes Report on August and 5C. Information. September Activities

An amendment to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan was approved on August 14, 2017, by the MAG Regional Council Executive Committee. Due to the approach of the end of the federal fiscal year, the Regional Council Executive Committee also approved necessary project changes that are dependent on federal authorization for FY 2017. Due to the additional release of federal funds from ADOT final voucher processing in August and September, MAG submitted one additional project change included in Table A to advance a repayment of funding. Please refer to the enclosed material.

3 MAG Regional Council -- Tentative Agenda October 25, 2017

*5D. MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Element/Funding 5D. Approval of the MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program Element/Funding Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program. Each year, the MAG Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Managers submit inventory and upgrade requests that are used to develop a five-year equipment program that forecasts future 9-1-1 equipment needs of the region and enables MAG to provide estimates of future needs to the Arizona Department of Administration (ADOA) for funding. The ADOA Order of Adoption stipulates allowable funding under the Emergency Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund. On April 3, 2017, the MAG PSAP Managers were requested to submit their equipment requests for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-2023 by July 14, 2017. The MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Element/Funding Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program were recommended for approval on August 10, 2017, by the MAG PSAP Managers Group, on September 28, 2017, by the MAG 9-1-1 Oversight Team, and on October 11, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee. Please refer to the enclosed material.

*5E. Projects for the MAG FY 2018 Traffic Signal 5E. Approval of the list of Traffic Signal Optimization Optimization Program Program projects for FY 2018.

The FY 2018 MAG Unified Planning Work Program and Annual Budget, approved by the MAG Regional Council in May 2017, includes $300,000 for Traffic Signal Optimization Program (TSOP) projects. On August 1, 2017, MAG announced a request for new projects for the FY 2018 TSOP. Eleven project applications were received by the deadline of August 28, 2017. One project was withdrawn by the local agency. On September 13, 2017, the MAG Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Committee completed the review of all applications and recommended all ten (10) proposed projects, plus two (2) additional projects that would involve performing before-and-after evaluations and the annual workshop on SYNCHRO, a traffic signal timing software. The total estimated cost for all twelve (12) projects is estimated to be $300,000. All projects will be carried out using MAG on-call consultants. The list of Traffic Signal Optimization

4 MAG Regional Council -- Tentative Agenda October 25, 2017

Program projects for FY 2018 was recommended for approval on September 28, 2017, by the MAG Transportation Review Committee and on October 11, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee. Please refer to the enclosed material.

*5F. Central Arizona Governments Loan Request 5F. Approval to enter into a loan agreement with the Central Arizona Governments (CAG) in the The Central Arizona Governments (CAG) has amount of $776,983 in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) requested that MAG enter into a loan agreement 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Program to assist them with $776,983 in Federal Fiscal funds to be utilized in the MAG region, and for Year (FFY) 2018 Federal Highway Administration repayment by MAG to CAG in FFY 2019 for (FHWA) suballocated Highway Safety $776,983, in Surface Transportation Block Grant Improvement Program funds (HSIP) that they Program funds. cannot utilize this year due to project delays. CAG requests that the funding amount of $776,983 be returned in FFY 2019 Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP-MAG) funds. The proposed CAG loan would have no negative impacts to the MAG region and would allow MAG projects during FHWA suballocated funding closeout and/or Arterial Life Cycle Program projects to receive advanced funding. The loan agreement with CAG was recommended for approval by the MAG Management Committee on October 11, 2017. Please refer to the enclosed material.

ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE HEARD

6. Recommendation of a Name for the Future 6. Approval of naming the Arizona State Route 30 Arizona State Route 30 Freeway corridor as “Tres Rios.”

On April 26, 2017, the MAG Regional Council adopted a Tentative Scenario for rebalancing the Regional Freeway and Highway Program. In this scenario, a phase I (interim) facility was recommended for the Arizona State Route 30 (SR-30) corridor. On September 27, 2017, the MAG Regional Council approved including State Route 30 in the funded MAG Regional Freeway and Highway Program. It has now been suggested that this new freeway corridor in the Southwest Valley be named the Tres Rios Freeway. This name would recognize the three rivers that are located near the new freeway corridor. In regard to naming freeways and highways in the MAG region, in 1986, the

5 MAG Regional Council -- Tentative Agenda October 25, 2017

Arizona Department of Transportation suggested that MAG provide recommendations for naming segments of the MAG Freeway and Highway Program. On June 27, 1986, the MAG Regional Council approved the process for naming segments of the MAG Freeway and Highway Program: Names are to be related to Arizona natural features, landmarks, or Indian names; Names should not exceed 13 letters; The facility type should not be indicated in the recommendation. A presentation will be provided on freeway naming in the Valley, and the steps needed to name SR-30. This item is on the October 18, 2017, Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) agenda. The TPC is requested to recommend the name Tres Rios to the MAG Regional Council. It is anticipated that the MAG Regional Council would approve the name Tres Rios and forward it to the Arizona State Board on Geographic and Historic Names for consideration. Please refer to the enclosed material.

7. Quarterly Status on the Implementation of the 7. Information and discussion. Regional Freeway and Highway Program

On April 26, 2017, the MAG Regional Council approved a tentative scenario for rebalancing the Regional Freeway and Highway Program. As this item was developed, MAG staff recommended the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) receive quarterly updates on the implementation of the Program. The last quarterly update was provided to the TPC on June 21, 2017, to account for project scheduling and material changes recommended by ADOT and MAG staff to construct the 37 projects of the rebalanced program. These changes were recommended for approval on June 21, 2017, by the TPC and approved by the MAG Regional Council on June 28, 2017. Since then, ADOT, with MAG assistance, has continued to refine delivery options and scoping of the projects. The Regional Council will be provided an update on these efforts in this quarterly status report on the Regional Freeway and Highway Program. This briefing was provided to the TPC on September

6 MAG Regional Council -- Tentative Agenda October 25, 2017

20, 2017, and to the MAG Management Committee on October 11, 2017.

8. Regional Plan to End Homelessness - Community 8. Information and discussion. Engagement

The Continuum of Care Board approved the Regional Plan to End Homelessness on August 25, 2017. The Plan includes goals and action steps to address homelessness across the region. MAG staff and the Continuum of Care Board co-Chairs will provide an overview of the scope of homelessness and present major themes of the plan. Staff will engage with Regional Council members in a discussion about how homelessness is impacting cities and towns throughout the region, including hearing from members about challenges and learning from each other about best practices to solve homelessness. Following the Solid Waste Best Practices in the MAG Region approach, staff will collect best practices from cities and towns and outline an approach to track implementation of best practices, as identified by MAG member agencies. This work will enhance the action steps outlined in the Regional Plan to End Homelessness and ultimately help move the needle of the Continuum of Care Board’s goal of ending homelessness through a coordinated regional response. On October 11, 2017, the MAG Management Committee participated in discussion on this topic. Please refer to the enclosed material.

9. Legislative Update 9. Information, discussion, and possible action.

An update will be provided on legislative issues of interest.

10. Request for Future Agenda Items 10. Information.

Topics or issues of interest that the Regional Council would like to have considered for discussion at a future meeting will be requested.

7 MAG Regional Council -- Tentative Agenda October 25, 2017

11. Comments from the Council 11. Information.

An opportunity will be provided for Regional Council members to present a brief summary of current events. The Regional Council is not allowed to propose, discuss, deliberate or take action at the meeting on any matter in the summary, unless the specific matter is properly noticed for legal action.

Adjournment

8 MINUTES OF THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL COUNCIL MEETING

September 27, 2017 MAG Office, Saguaro Room Phoenix, Arizona

MEMBERS ATTENDING

Mayor Jackie Meck, Buckeye, Chair #Mayor Valerie Molina, Guadalupe Mayor Gail Barney, Queen Creek, Vice Chair Mayor Thomas Schoaf, Litchfield Park Councilmember Robin Barker, Mayor Christian Price, City of Maricopa Apache Junction Supervisor Denny Barney, Maricopa County # Mayor Kenneth Weise, Avondale Mayor John Giles, Mesa Councilmember Mike Farrar, Carefree *Mayor Michael Collins, Paradise Valley Councilmember David L. Smith, Cave Creek *Mayor Cathy Carlat, Peoria * Mayor Jay Tibshraeny, Chandler Mayor Greg Stanton, Phoenix Mayor Lana Mook, El Mirage *Supervisor Todd House, Pinal County # Mayor Tara Walter, Florence *President Delbert Ray, Salt River * President Bernadine Burnette, Fort Pima-Maricopa Indian Community McDowell Yavapai Nation Mayor W.J. “Jim” Lane, Scottsdale # Councilmember Nick DePorter, Fountain Hills Mayor Sharon Wolcott, Surprise * Mayor Tommy Lee Sikes, Gila Bend Mayor Mark Mitchell, Tempe * Governor Stephen Roe Lewis, Gila River Mayor Anna Tovar, Tolleson Indian Community *Mayor Everett Sickles, Wickenburg Mayor Jenn Daniels, Gilbert Mayor Michael LeVault, Youngtown Mayor Jerry Weiers, Glendale Mr. Joseph La Rue, State Transportation Board Mayor Georgia Lord, Goodyear Mr. Jack Sellers, State Transportation Board

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Attended by telephone conference call. + Attended by videoconference

1. Call to Order

A quorum of the MAG Regional Council was present and a video on MAG meeting guidelines and public input opportunities was played.

The meeting of the MAG Regional Council was called to order by Chair Jackie Meck, City of Buckeye, at 11:34 a.m.

2. Pledge of Allegiance

The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

-1- Councilman Nick DePorter, Mayor Valerie Molina, Mayor Tara Walter, and Mayor Kenn Weise joined the meeting by teleconference.

Chair Meck noted that the revised materials for agenda items #6D and #6G that were previously transmitted were at each place. These materials were also on the meeting materials tables on each side of the Saguaro Room. Also at each place was a flier from the Morrison Institute for Public Policy announcing its State of the State Conference on November 7, 2017.

3. Call to the Audience

An opportunity was provided to members of the public to address the Regional Council on items that are not on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of MAG, or on items on the agenda for discussion but not for action. Citizens were requested not to exceed a three minute time period for their comments. A total of 15 minutes will be provided for the Call to the Audience agenda item, unless the Regional Council requests an exception to this limit. Those wishing to comment on agenda items posted for action will be provided the opportunity at the time the item is heard.

Chair Meck recognized public comment from Ms. Dianne Barker, who said she is a resident of Maricopa County. Ms. Barker spoke of traffic bottlenecks that cause bumper to bumper traffic. She stated that wrong-way drivers occur on streets other than freeways. Ms. Barker stated that she encountered one on Third Avenue, a one-way street in Phoenix, the other day. She stated that she believes in multimodal transportation and she has done cartwheels in support. Ms. Barker stated that she would like to see more Regional Council members ridesharing. She stated that she likes to see transportation reduction program riders rewarded for taking alternative transportation. Ms. Barker stated that she receives automatic air pollution notifications. She stated that a lot of pollution is created by vehicles and asked members if they received a parking stamp or a transit pass. Chair Meck thanked Ms. Barker.

4. Resolutions of Appreciation for Individual Contributions to the MAG Region

Mr. Dennis Smith, MAG Executive Director, spoke of two individuals who are the heart and soul of the MAG organization and are set to retire. Mr. Roger Herzog is the architect of Proposition 300. Mr. Smith stated that transportation projects cannot be built without passing the air quality test. He said that the work done by Ms. Cathy Arthur enabled those projects to be built.

Chair Meck noted that the first individual being recognized is Ms. Cathy Arthur. A Resolution of Appreciation was prepared to acknowledge her contributions to the MAG region. Chair Meck read the Resolution. He asked for a motion.

Councilmember Robin Barker moved to adopt the Resolution of Appreciation for Cathy Arthur. Mayor Gail Barney seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.

Chair Meck called forward Ms. Arthur to receive her Resolution of Appreciation. A photograph was taken. Ms. Arthur received a round of applause.

-2- Chair Meck stated that the next individual being recognized is Mr. Roger Herzog. A Resolution of Appreciation was prepared to acknowledge his contributions to the MAG region. Chair Meck read the Resolution and called for a motion.

Mayor Gail Barney moved to adopt the Resolution of Appreciation for Roger Herzog. Councilmember Robin Barker seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.

Chair Meck called forward Mr. Herzog to receive his Resolution of Appreciation. A photograph was taken. Mr. Herzog was applauded.

Chair Meck expressed his appreciation to Ms. Arthur and Mr. Herzog for their efforts to make the MAG region a better place for our residents.

5. Executive Director’s Report

Mr. Dennis Smith reported on items of interest to the MAG region. He stated that the Don’t Trash Arizona program won the Environmental Excellence Award of Merit at the Copper Anvil Awards presented by the Public Relations Society of America. Mr. Smith noted that Ms. Kelly Taft, MAG, manages the program.

Mr. Smith stated that a celebration of new non-stop service from Phoenix to Montreal on Air Canada is planned for October 11, 2017, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Sky Harbor Airport. He noted that an invitation to the event has been sent to Regional Council and Economic Development Committee members.

Mr. Smith stated that on September 25, 2017, MAG hosted approximately 50 Arizona State University professors and PhD students for a presentation on MAG Big Data.

Mr. Smith noted that the Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care Board approved the Regional Plan to End Homelessness August 2017. He noted that the work of the Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care Board does not always flow through to the Management Committee and Regional Council. He stated that next month, an item on homeless planning will be on the October Management Committee and Regional Council agendas. Mr. Smith stated that the discussion will include best practices, what jurisdictions are doing for the homeless, and how we can make a difference. He noted that this year’s annual street count showed an increase in the homeless population in this region of 20 percent. Mr. Smith requested that members speak with their staff about what their jurisdiction is doing to bring to the discussion.

6. Approval of Consent Agenda

Chair Meck noted that agenda items #6A, #6B, #6C, #6D, #6E, #6F, #6G, #6H, #6I, #6J, #6K, and #6L were on the Consent Agenda.

A statement-only public comment card from Ms. Dianne Barker in support of the August 30, 2017, meeting minutes was received.

-3- Chair Meck asked if members had questions or requests for a presentation on any of the Consent Agenda items.

Mayor Kenn Weise stated that he did not want to pull agenda item #6E, but would like to request having a discussion at the October Regional Council meeting regarding naming SR-30.

Mr. Smith stated that if the Regional Council approved a name for SR-30, it would need to forward the name to the historical naming commission in Arizona. He said that in 1985, the Regional Council established a naming convention using geographic landmarks, such as Red Mountain or Santan. Mr. Smith indicated that he thought staying within the naming convention we would be fine.

Mayor Gail Barney moved to approve the Consent Agenda items #6A through #6L. Councilmember Robin Barker seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.

6A. Approval of the August 30, 2017, Meeting Minutes

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the August 30, 2017, meeting minutes.

6B. Revisions to the MAG Pinal County Arterial and Bridge Program - Programming and Evaluation Policy

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the proposed revisions to the MAG Pinal County Arterial and Bridge Program - Programming and Evaluation Policy. The MAG Pinal County Arterial and Bridge Program - Programming and Evaluation Policy was approved by the MAG Regional Council on February 25, 2015. Since then, two calls-for-projects have been issued and more than $6.8 million in funding has been awarded. A working group comprising agency managers and transportation directors from MAG member agencies in Pinal County met on August 10, 2017, to review the Programming and Evaluation Policy prior to the new call-for-projects being issued this fall. At the meeting, several proposed revisions were presented to the attendees. There was agreement that the proposed revisions to the Programming and Evaluation Policy were needed to strengthen the criteria and project comparability. The proposed revisions to the Programming and Evaluation Policy were recommended for approval on August 31, 2017, by the MAG Transportation Review Committee and on September 13, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee.

6C. MAG FY 2018 MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans and First Time Updates On-Call

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved funding for bicycle and pedestrian master plan(s)/Active Transportation Plan(s) for the following member agencies (in rank order): Glendale Active Transportation Plan ($197,800), Surprise Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan ($34,615), Apache Junction Active Transportation Plan ($197,800), and Queen Creek Bike-Pedestrian Master Plan ($49,450). The FY 2018 MAG Unified Work Program and Annual Budget, approved by the Regional Council in May 2017, includes $480,000 for the FY 2018 MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans and First Time Updates On-Call. Six master plan applications were submitted from member agencies Apache Junction, Buckeye, Florence, Glendale, Queen Creek and Surprise. The MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee ranked the plans and, at the August 15, 2017 meeting, recommended four plans for funding (in rank order): Glendale Active Transportation Plan ($197,800), Surprise Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan ($34,615), Apache Junction Active Transportation Plan ($197,800), and Queen

-4- Creek Bike-Pedestrian Master Plan ($49,450). The four plans for funding (in rank order) were recommended for approval on August 31, 2017, by the MAG Transportation Review Committee and on September 13, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee.

6D. Conformity Consultation

The Maricopa Association of Governments is conducting consultation on a conformity assessment for an amendment and administrative modification to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. The amendment and administrative modification involve several projects, including Arizona Department of Transportation projects on State Route 24 and other miscellaneous projects. The amendment includes projects that may be categorized as exempt from conformity determinations. The administrative modification includes minor project revisions that do not require a conformity determination. This item was on the agenda for consultation.

6E. New Finding of Conformity for the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan, As Amended

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the new Finding of Conformity for the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan, as amended. On June 28, 2017, the MAG Regional Council approved the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. An amendment to the TIP and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan is required to include the 2016/2017 Freeway and Highway Program Rebalancing, Interstate 10 and Interstate 17 Corridor Master Plan Recommendations, Arterial Life Cycle Program Revision for Project Removal and Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension, Transit Life Cycle Program Revision for the Glendale Park-and-Ride, the Interstate 11 corridor from Interstate 10 to US-93, and State Route 30 corridor as a freeway facility from State Route 85 to Loop 303 and from Loop 202 (South Mountain) to Interstate 17. The project modifications impact the modeling assumptions used in the most recent conformity analysis and a new regional emissions analysis for the Maricopa and Pinal County nonattainment and maintenance areas was conducted. The results of the regional emissions analysis, when considered together with the TIP and RTP as a whole, indicate that the amendment will not contribute to violations of federal air quality standards. On August 18, 2017, the Maricopa Association of Governments transmitted for consultation the conformity analysis for the proposed amendment to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan. On September 13, 2017, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of the new Finding of Conformity for the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan, as amended.

6F. Amendments to the 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved amendments to the 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan, incorporating: (1) 2016/2017 Freeway/Highway Program Rebalancing, (2) Interstate10/Interstate17 Corridor Master Plan Recommendations, (3) Arterial Life Cycle Program Revision - Project Removal and Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension, and (4) Transit Life Cycle Program Revision - Glendale Park-and-Ride, contingent on a finding of conformity. During FY 2017, amendments to the 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) were approved by the MAG

-5- Regional Council, contingent on a new finding of conformity. A new conformity analysis was performed on the 2040 RTP and the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), with the proposed amendments included, and demonstrated that the RTP and TIP meet all air quality conformity requirements. The specific changes to the 2040 RTP include: (1) 2016/2017 Freeway/Highway Program Rebalancing, (2) Interstate10/Interstate17 Corridor Master Plan Recommendations, (3) Arterial Life Cycle Program Revision - Project Removal and Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension, and (4) Transit Life Cycle Program Revision - Glendale Park-and-Ride. The amendments to the RTP were recommended for approval on August 31, 2017, by the MAG Transportation Review Committee, on September 13, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee, and on September 20, 2017, by the Transportation Policy Committee.

6G. Project Changes - Amendment and Administrative Modification to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan, and FY 2018 Arterial Life Cycle Program

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the proposed project changes for the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan, and FY 2018 Arterial Life Cycle Program, contingent on a finding of conformity. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), and the FY 2018 Arterial Life Cycle Program (ALCP) were approved by the MAG Regional Council on June 28, 2017, with the last modification approved at the August 14, 2017, MAG Regional Council Executive Committee meeting. Since then, additional changes and modifications have been requested by member agencies. Project changes requested may be contingent on a new finding of conformity. The requested project changes, contingent on a new finding of conformity, were recommended for approval on August 31, 2017, by the MAG Transportation Review Committee, on September 13, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee, and on September 20, 2017, by the Transportation Policy Committee.

6H. Major Amendment to the Regional Transportation Plan - Arizona State Route 30, SR-85 to Interstate 17

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the proposed Major Amendment to the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan to add the Arizona State Route 30 corridor as a freeway facility from SR-85 to Loop 303 and from Loop 202/South Mountain to Interstate17, and that the Regional Transportation Plan be amended, contingent on a finding of conformity. This agenda item represents the final step to approve this Major Amendment to the MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The first step was to initiate the RTP Major Amendment Process and request outside consultation as required by state statute A.R.S. §28-6353. On April 26, 2017, the MAG Regional Council began the Major Amendment process by requesting consultation on the proposed major amendment to add SR-30 as a freeway corridor from SR-85 to Loop 303, as well as extending the corridor from Loop 202/South Mountain to Interstate 17 into the MAG 2040 RTP, contingent on a finding of conformity. No objections have been expressed on the proposed Major Amendment for SR-30. This requested action is for final approval to add the project into the RTP subject to the final approval of the conformity analysis by the MAG Regional Council. The proposed Major Amendment was recommended for approval on September 13, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee and on September 20, 2017, by the Transportation Policy Committee.

-6- 6I. Major Amendment to the Regional Transportation Plan - Interstate 11, Interstate10 to US-93

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the proposed Major Amendment to the MAG 2040 Regional Transportation Plan to add the Interstate 11 corridor from Interstate 10 to US-93 in the West Valley into the MAG 2040 Regional Transportation Plan, and that the Regional Transportation Plan be amended, contingent on a finding of conformity. This agenda item represents the final step to approve this Major Amendment to the MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The first step was to initiate the RTP Major Amendment Process and request outside consultation as required by state statute A.R.S. §28-6353. On April 26, 2017, the MAG Regional Council began the Major Amendment process by requesting consultation on the proposed major amendment to add the Interstate 11 corridor from Interstate 10 to US-93 in the West Valley into the MAG 2040 Regional Transportation Plan, contingent on a finding of conformity. No objections have been expressed. This requested action is for final approval to add the project into the RTP subject to the final approval of the conformity analysis by the Regional Council. The proposed Major Amendment was recommended for approval on September 13, 2017, by the MAG Management Committee and on September 20, 2017, by the Transportation Policy Committee.

6J. FY 2017 TIGER Applications

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved support for two FY 2017 TIGER grant applications. On September 6, 2017, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity for the ninth round of Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) discretionary grant funding. A total of $500 million is available through a competitive merit-based grant program. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 TIGER program gives special consideration to projects which emphasize improved access to reliable, safe, and affordable transportation for communities in rural areas; a minimum of 20 percent of the funds ($100 million) shall be used for projects located in rural areas. Urban applications must include a 20-percent minimum local (non-federal) match and all projects must demonstrate readiness in order to obligate funding by September 30, 2020. The application deadline was October 16, 2017. Member agencies interested in seeking a letter of regional support for an FY 2017 TIGER application were asked to notify MAG by September 18, 2017. The following projects were submitted for regional consideration: 1) Urban Submission, Valley Metro: I-10/I-17 Transitway. This project has been supported by the MAG Regional Council in its two previous submissions (2015 and 2016). This project proposes a ramp connecting I-10 to I-17 that will be exclusive to commuter express buses and future light rail transit. Valley Metro is seeking approximately $15.1 million in TIGER grant funding to augment approximately $13.4 million in local match. 2) Urban Submission, City of Chandler: Chandler Heights Road - McQueen Road to Val Vista Drive. This project includes the widening of Chandler Heights Road to a four-lane cross-section with various improvements, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, as well as “smart” technology including fiber connectivity. The City of Chandler is seeking $9.5 million in TIGER grant funding to augment approximately $11.5 million in local match and $6.5 million from other funding sources.

-7- 6K. Approval of the Proposed Amendment to the MAG By-Laws Regarding the Citizens Transportation Oversight Committee

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the proposed amendment to the MAG By-Laws to remove the Chairman of the Citizens Transportation Oversight Committee as a member of the MAG Regional Council. On May 19, 2017, Governor Ducey signed HB 2369 (Chapter Law 315) that eliminated the Citizens Transportation Oversight Committee (CTOC). This elimination of the CTOC removes the Chairman of the CTOC from the MAG Regional Council and the Transportation Policy Committee. The CTOC Chairman is recognized in the MAG By-Laws as a member of the Regional Council. An amendment was prepared that would remove the CTOC Chairman from the MAG By-Laws. On August 30, 2017, the MAG Regional Council approved initiating the 15-day review period for the amendment to the MAG By-Laws to remove the Chairman of CTOC as a member of the MAG Regional Council. The proposed amendment was posted on the MAG website for a minimum of 15 days for public consideration. No public comments were received.

6L. Draft MAG Freight Network and Submission of the Top 60 Lane Miles to the Federal Highway Administration for Critical Urban Freight Corridor Designation and Approval

The MAG Regional Council, by consent, approved the Draft MAG Freight Network and submission of the top 60 lane miles to the Federal Highway Administration for critical urban freight corridor designation and approval. The MAG Freight Transportation Plan was initiated in early 2016 in an effort to meet the Federal Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act freight provisions. The project team and regional stakeholders were tasked with identifying and ranking the critical urban freight corridor network for the MAG region and submitting the top 60 lane miles for federal approval. The project team evaluated the movement of goods through the region and identified an arterial network that supports the critical connections from existing industrial clusters to the region's interstates and highways. MAG staff recommends approval of the Draft MAG Freight Network and submission of the top 60 lanes miles to the Federal Highway Administration for critical urban fright corridor designation and approval. On September 13, 2017, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of this item. On September 20, 2017, the Transportation Policy Committee heard a presentation on the Draft MAG Freight Network.

8. Report on Phoenix International Raceway Project

This agenda item was taken out of order.

Mr. Bryan Sperber, President of Phoenix International Raceway, provided a report to the Regional Council on the economic impact of the venue on the region and major changes and renovations being made to the facility. Mr. Sperber stated that Phoenix International Raceway was built in 1964 is a subsidiary of the International Speedway Corporation, a publicly traded company, with numerous properties across the nation. It is owned by two members of the France family who also own NASCAR.

Mr. Sperber stated that International Speedway Corporation renovated Daytona International Speedway in the amount of $400 million and the Phoenix International Raceway project represents approximately

-8- $178 million in planned improvements. He noted that Governor Ducey was instrumental in persuading the parent company to make investments in this project and creating a positive economic climate.

Mr. Sperber stated that the MAG region is fast growing and is attractive to event planners. He said that NASCAR hosts two events annually in the region. Mr. Sperber stated that television ratings and the fan base for these events is very high. He stated that the PIR facility hosts more than 100 events per year and would love for communities to book PIR for their events.

Mr. Sperber than described the improvements that include new escalators, elevators, seats, and tunnels. He noted that PIR will be the only sports facility that will be completely Wi-Fi enabled. Mr. Sperber stated that the groundbreaking was in February 2017 with the grand opening in November 2018. He displayed a graphic of the planned grandstand that resembles a football stadium. Mr. Sperber stated that the facility will have two entrances, called canyonways. He said that corporate partners will have an opportunity to create an experience.

Mr. Sperber displayed a graphic of the new bar and grill, which will be opening in March 2018. He added that it will be branded by a restaurant chain and they will be making that announcement soon. Mr. Sperber stated that a new pedestrian tunnel will connect the grandstand to the infield Fanzone. He called the new facility Disneyland meets motor racing.

Mr. Sperber stated that a new Victory Lane, scoreboards and videoboards are included in the improvements. He displayed the new Fanzone with greenery in the design and he noted that it is more entertainment-focused. Mr. Sperber stated that several bars and restaurants will be built. In the infield is a new NASCAR garage, where fans will be able to interact with the teams and drivers. Mr. Sperber stated that there will be state-of-the-art suites and a new media center. They anticipate they will host approximately 3,000 credentialed media for NASCAR events.

Mr. Sperber stated that Curve, a very high-end new club, opens in November 2017. He said that new guest suites also will be opening. Mr. Sperber stated that yesterday, it was announced that ISM had reached an agreement for the new name, ISM Raceway, which will begin in January. ISM is a leading edge experiential technology company that works with some of the biggest brands in the world, such as Google, Carlos Slim’s company, etc., and companies will be integrated into this unparalleled experience.

Chair Meck thanked Mr. Sperber for his report and asked members if they had questions.

Mayor Georgia Lord expressed appreciation for the investment being made. She said that PIR is one of the stars of the West Valley and brings tourism that benefits everyone in the Valley. Mayor Lord stated that the new facility looks terrific.

Mr. Sperber noted that Mr. Jimmy Hamilton, who was present at the meeting, coordinates visits and tours of the facility.

Mayor Greg Stanton asked about non-racing events being hosted at the facility.

-9- Mr. Sperber noted that entertainment other than racing will take place at the facility, for example, Tough Mudder opening in March 2018. He added that they are in deep discussions with a number of athletic, musical and cultural events.

Mayor Jerry Weiers asked about the antique car event.

Mr. Sperber stated that the event will be held in conjunction with the 25th anniversary of the last win of Mr. Mario Andretti, which occurred at PIR. Mr. Sperber noted that Mr. Andretti will be appearing at the event with some of his race cars.

Chair Meck thanked Mr. Sperber for his report to the Regional Council. Mr. Sperber was applauded.

7. Domestic Violence Awareness Month

Councilmember Robin Barker provided a report on Domestic Violence Awareness Month activities. She said that a press conference, entitled Animal Abuse and Domestic Violence: a Deadly Link, is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on September 29, 2017.

Councilmember Barker stated that members of the MAG Domestic Violence Council represent police, judges, attorneys, and victim advocates, among others. She indicated that the Domestic Violence Council has worked on the Protocol Evaluation Project that coordinates protocols and practices used by law enforcement and prosecutors when responding to domestic violence offenders to ensure consistency. Councilmember Barker noted that the multi-disciplinary cooperation is key to the success of the Protocol Evaluation Project. She indicated that the work of the Domestic Violence Council has been effective – the total number of deaths from domestic violence in 2012 was 139 and in 2016, the total number dropped to 100.

Councilmember Barker stated that she was so impressed with everyone’s participation and expressed her appreciation for all of the support. Councilmember Barker urged jurisdictions to light their buildings purple so when passengers fly over our region, they will notice and this will build awareness.

Chair Meck thanked Councilmember Barker and asked if there were questions.

Mayor Sharon Wolcott expressed her appreciation to Councilmember Barker and commented this is a very important effort. Mayor Wolcott stated that the City of Surprise lit its entire municipal complex last year and it was very well received. She said that City staff has said they have a terrific plan for this year.

Mayor Michael LeVault moved approval of the Resolution of Support for Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Councilmember Robin Barker seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.

Members gathered for a group photo.

9. Maricopa County Trip Reduction Program

Mr. Dennis Smith introduced the report on the Maricopa County Trip Reduction (TRP) Program. Mr. Smith stated that in 1988, the State Legislature passed a law requiring a trip or travel reduction program

-10- in Maricopa County. He thanked the County for doing a terrific job managing the program, which is funded by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and MAG. Mr. Smith stated that during the Great Recession, MAG staff worked with County staff to add questions to the TRP survey instrument in order to gain more data that would help economic development efforts. He said that approximately 500,000 people respond to the TRP survey annually – a very large sample. Mr. Smith stated that this cooperation between the County and MAG turned a regulatory program into a very powerful economic development tool. Mr. Smith stated that MAG could not have done this without the County.

Mr. Smith introduced Mr. Phil Cummings from the Maricopa County Trip Reduction Program. Mr. Cummings stated that the first survey was conducted in 1990. In 2001, the e-survey, which saved a lot on costs and increased the number of responses, was begun. Mr. Cummings stated that the old legacy database software has been updated with the assistance of MAG.

Mr. Cummings stated that in 2016, approximately 3,000 employer sites participated in the TRP. He noted that the surveys show different industries and where the labor force lives and works. Mr. Cummings said that during 2016, the survey was sent to approximately 800,000 students and employees with a 70 percent response rate.

Mr. Cummings stated that Maricopa County staff fulfills two aspects of the TRP. The first is research analysis, which includes collecting data through the annual survey process. Mr. Cummings stated that the second aspect is plan review, which includes conducting annual employer compliance audits, reviewing plans, and recommending plan enhancements.

Mr. Cummings displayed a copy of the new survey instrument, which contains additional questions. He indicated that County staff assist the travel coordinators in implementing the TRP. He stated that the TRP prevented approximately 12,000 tons of pollution last year. Mr. Cummings added that the total of miles traveled daily by alternative vehicle (bus, bike, walk, car/van pool, compressed work week, telecommute) is approximately five million miles.

Mr. Cummings stated that the TRP Regional Task Force provides recommendations to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and approves plans. He noted that the current nine Board members were appointed by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. Mr. Cummings said that the new software is now in use and they anticipate a new survey with new questions will be issued in January 2018.

Chair Meck asked members if they had questions for Mr. Cummings. None were noted.

MAG staff member Mr. Anubhav Bagley then explained how MAG utilizes the TRP data. Mr. Bagley stated that approximately 3,000 businesses and 500,000 employees are included in the data. Mr. Bagley stated that the data are used in the MAG employer database that is provided to member agencies and is also used in transportation planning. He noted that the data can be analyzed to show where different industries are located and where the labor force from those industries reside. Mr. Bagley stated that the map tool to do these analyses is located on the MAG website.

Mr. Bagley stated that MAG has been working with WESTMARC and the West Valley communities on the workforce education analysis regarding the disparity in the communities west of Interstate 17 and

-11- the number of jobs. He said that MAG can analyze the import and export of workers using the TRP data. Mr. Bagley noted that one of the questions asked by developers and businesses is where their potential workforce resides. He stated that increasing the number of occupations from eight to 18 to the TRP survey is being considered to add additional detail.

Ms. Christine Mackay, City of Phoenix, continued the presentation. She introduced her colleague, Mr. Joseph MacEwan. She described how the City of Phoenix works with MAG on utilizing the data on an economic development level. Ms. Mackay stated that approximately 168,000 people work in the downtown Phoenix corridor, but only three percent of those workers reside in the Central City. By reverse engineering the data, they were able to determine the reason people are leaving the Central City for the suburbs. Ms. Mackay also noted that 51 percent of the downtown workers leave the City of Phoenix for home, taking with them their wages.

Ms. Mackay stated that they found that the residential opportunities in the Central City and the wages did not match up. Ms. Mackay stated that this provided an opportunity to develop density in the Central City and provide residential opportunities for workers in the Central City. The data show an individual’s education level, household income, marital status, and number of children.

Ms. Mackay stated that Phoenix uses the data in its approximately 1,000 annual business retention expansion visits and they can report to the businesses the type of workforce surrounding their company. She noted that there is no way for them to get this type of ground level data other than at MAG.

Ms. Mackay stated that Mayor Stanton had a vision for a new employment corridor along the new Loop 202 within the City of Phoenix called the South Mountain Technology Corridor. Phoenix, WESTMARC, and MAG partnered on this effort. Ms. Mackay stated that they heard from brokers and developers that there was not enough of a technical workforce to support these types of companies west of Interstate 17. Ms. Mackay stated that using the TRP data, they were able to show that 69 percent of the workers west of I-17 leave the area for work, showing a robust workforce. She noted that they are using the data as a strong economic development tool to create jobs.

Mr. Joseph MacEwan thanked Ms. Mackay and said that he appreciates working on special projects such as this project. He indicated that with this project he could conduct research and utilize the skills he learned in school. Mr. MacEwan stated that telling a story about our workforce is critical to attracting and maintaining businesses.

Chair Meck asked members if they had questions.

Mayor Sharon Wolcott congratulated the team for this initiative. This has shaken up the status quo. Mayor Wolcott stated that when she moved here, she left her workplace at St. Luke’s hospital at 7:00 a.m., heading west, she encountered most of the West Valley heading east to work. She stated that there is a mismatch, either housing or jobs. Mayor Wolcott stated that this is the pattern of development over the years that is reflected in the available data. She noted that everyone is trying to make their city the best, but a workforce on the road during commute times is a huge drain on families. Mayor Wolcott expressed her congratulations on an effort that is beneficial to everyone and empowers others to utilize

-12- data from MAG in the same way. She congratulated the City of Phoenix on being a leader in utilizing technology.

10. Appointments to MAG Leadership Positions

Mr. Dennis Smith stated that at the June 28, 2017, MAG Regional Council meeting, there was an opening for the Vice Chair of the Transportation Policy Committee. Due to the Passing of the Gavel ceremony, an abbreviated meeting was held. At that time it was mentioned that at a future meeting members would discuss Pinal County serving in leadership positions.

Mr. Smith stated that the opening for the Vice Chair position drove the question: Are the agencies in Pinal east, west, central, or something else? Mr. Smith noted that only 14 Regional Council who were members in 2013 when the MAG planning boundary was expanded, remain as current Regional Council members. Due to this, he would provide a historical review.

Mr. Smith stated that on April 24, 2002, the MAG Regional Council approved the composition of the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC). The purpose was to be successful in having the voters renew the one-half cent sales tax for transportation. Mr. Smith stated that the Chair of the MAG Regional Council, Mayor Skip Rimsza of Phoenix, said MAG was too insular, and business members needed to be included in the TPC composition to gain support. He noted that six members representing regionwide business were invited by the Regional Council to sit on the TPC.

Mr. Smith stated that on February 5, 2004, the Governor signed HB 2456 Transportation Excise Tax that placed the TPC in state statute, but the bill said the business members would be appointed by the Speaker of the Arizona House and the President of the Arizona Senate.

Mr. Smith stated that MAG is a Transportation Management Area and a nonattainment area. Due to MAG receiving federal funds, the Federal Highway Administration requires that the MAG program be certified. At the federal certification in 2004, the FHWA asked if MAG had expanded its boundaries. The FHWA regulation required that the area expected to be urbanized in the next 20-year period become a part of MAG. Mr. Smith stated that in 2009, at the MAG federal certification, FHWA again asked if MAG had expanded its boundaries.

Mr. Smith said that the 2010 Census defined new urbanized boundaries and MAG was required to expand its boundaries. At the February 27, 2013, Regional Council meeting, members discussed the new members voting. Mr. Smith stated that it was noted at the time that the new members would not vote on MAG’s 208 items because Central Arizona Governments already conducts that area’s 208 process. Another point of discussion was voting on Proposition 400 sales tax funding. Mr. Smith noted then that due to the sales tax being collected in Maricopa County only, Pinal members would not be eligible to vote on these issues.

Mr. Smith stated that the Regional Council voted to approve sending out the By-Laws change in anticipation of the Governor of Arizona approving the change in the MAG boundary. He said that on April 15, 2013, the Executive Committee approved the Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary be conveyed to the Governor. Mr. Smith stated that on May 9, 2013, the Governor of Arizona requested that the new MAG boundary be approved. On May 22, 2013, the Regional Council approved the

-13- proposed MAG By-Laws Amendment and the Town of Florence and the City of Maricopa became members of MAG. Mr. Smith noted that on June 19, 2013, the Regional Council approved Pinal County becoming a member of MAG.

Mr. Smith stated that on August 12, 2013, the Executive Committee approved the revised MAG Committee Operating Policies and Procedures and he said that one of the changes was to include the Town of Florence, the City of Maricopa and Pinal County to be eligible for becoming a member of the Transportation Policy Committee.

Mr. Smith noted that MAG receives those three agencies’ federal funds. The issue is what they get to vote on at MAG. Mr. Smith stated that they vote on the Regional Transportation Plan and the Five-Year Transportation Improvement Program because their projects are contained in those plans. He noted that they should not vote on the sales tax because it is only collected in Maricopa County. Mr. Smith stated that there are other opportunities at MAG besides the TPC. He added that one of the questions is whether a TPC member outside of Maricopa County could be in a leadership position without a stake in the game. Mr. Smith stated that a commitment was made at the June Regional Council meeting to have further discussion on this and he added that this item was on the agenda for information and discussion only.

Mayor Christian Price thanked everyone for hearing this item. He expressed that he had done his due diligence when the City of Maricopa became a member and realized that balance was important. Mayor Price stated that his City does not fit into the east/west designation. He said that the purpose today is to have an open discussion on how to have these items on the table and have a policy discussion. Mayor Price stated that change is difficult. The decision has been made to expand the MAG boundary and the question in his mind is parity. Mayor Price commented that as a representative for his constituents who pay taxes and MAG dues, the question becomes whether they are being treated as equal members of MAG. He indicated that he and Mayor Schoaf had a wonderful conversation and although they are have different viewpoints, it is like any negotiation that requires discussion to come to an agreement.

Mayor Price stated that he did not intend to disrupt the balance of east/west and he would like to know at what point would submitting his interest not disrupt the balance and take someone else’s turn. He stated that he would also like to know if they would have an opportunity to participate on the Executive Committee as members. Mayor Price asked if the three agencies deserved to have a seat at that table? He said that he has had discussions with Mayor Tara Walter and Supervisor Todd House and they indicated that they feel the same way. Mayor Price remarked that the balance works and he had no desire to create another faction. He indicated that he abstained from votes on the sales tax or 208 because they are beyond his purview, and wondered where he could participate.

Mayor Price requested that during discussion, members place themselves in his position. Would it be acceptable to pay dues with their constituents’ money and have limitations placed on them? Mayor Price stated that at the end of the day, they want to find parity and balance. The MAG Regional Council members are policy makers and he felt they are capable of finding a solution. He indicated that discussion could always be sent back to the Management Committee or staff. Mayor Price recalled that at the September Transportation Policy Committee meeting, Mayor Giles was presented with a Resolution of Appreciation as past Chair meeting. He said that during the presentation, Mayor Weise

-14- mentioned Mayor Giles’s ability to negotiate during difficult discussions. Mayor Price suggested that a member from a jurisdiction who does not have a dog in the fight might be a positive. Who might be better as a mediator as a neutral party than someone who has no stake in the outcome? A chair from Pinal County might be a better way to help mediate those arguments as someone who is looking at both sides of the argument from a fairness perspective.

Chair Meck asked members if they had questions or comments.

Mayor Sharon Wolcott stated that at the February 2013 Regional Council meeting, she expressed concern for expanding MAG’s boundary into Pinal County. She expressed that she understood Mayor Price’s perspective about paying dues with taxpayer funds because she is in the same position. Mayor Wolcott stated that it is healthy to discuss whether a balance is being accomplished. She stated that the East Valley is growing into Pinal County. The West Valley has been a good collaborative partner in the Regional Council for a long time and has waited its turn because the East Valley matured much faster, but it is now the West Valley’s turn because it is growing. Mayor Wolcott noted a lot of investment coming into the West Valley. She added that they do not begrudge one penny that has gone to the east side of I-17, but the West Valley gets nervous when the picture changes. Mayor Wolcott spoke of carving up regional resources into more sections of the pie.

Mayor Wolcott stated that this region has sprawl due to homebuilders wanting to invest in our communities. There is a cost for that – housing does not fit the job markets. Mayor Wolcott stated that she had many questions on how to move forward this body as a whole. She said that she read about the Sun Corridor when she was a Minnesota state legislator and she thought it was the future. Mayor Wolcott stated that she has not heard a lot of discussion about how the West Valley fits into the Sun Corridor vision. She sees the Sun Corridor as the central corridor to Tucson. Mayor Wolcott expressed that a lot of discussion is needed and she had a lot of questions about participation. Mayor Wolcott expressed appreciation to Mayor Price for bringing forward this issue. She indicated that she and Mayor Price were good colleagues and friends and she hoped that would continue.

Mayor Wolcott stated that other regions recognize the commute shed issue and have approached it differently. She said that recently she attended the new Minnesota State Capitol opening and she was approached by a lobbyist who said to her they think they need to restructure their MPO. Mayor Wolcott offered to show them how MAG does things. She stated that MAG has done a lot of good work and Minnesota did it differently. Mayor Wolcott stated that she objected to the structure strenuously when she was in the Minnesota Legislature. She expressed her preference for having a discussion in an open forum working collaboratively than in side discussions.

Mayor Wolcott stated that this region has a lot of potential and needs to ensure that every member has equal access to all of the information that other members have. She expressed her appreciation for the Joint Planning Advisory Council (JPAC)-type discussions and would like them to be more prevalent in the West Valley. Mayor Wolcott stated that Tucson has a viewpoint different from MAG. She said that she looked forward to continued discussion. Mayor Wolcott stated that she wants to ensure that the West Valley’s burgeoning growth is not given short shrift in the discussion. She said that the West Valley has been good partners. Mayor Wolcott stated that portions of Proposition 400 are dedicated to transit and she would like to know if this has occurred. She stated that Surprise is at the end of the

-15- world’s largest cul-de-sac. They look to the City of Phoenix. Mayor Wolcott stated that it is important for the City of Surprise to connect to roads and transit on the regional grid. Mayor Wolcott stated that her senior citizen, sick residents, and residents with disabilities have been left at the curb by a regional transit system that has been failing them in the past several months. She said that the City of Surprise understands Mayor Price’s concerns because it is far out like the City of Maricopa, however, she wanted to ensure that when they reach out to Mayor Price, their own residents are not being left behind. Mayor Wolcott expressed that she appreciated the discussion.

Councilmember Robin Barker stated that the City of Apache Junction is the cul-de-sac at the opposite end of the region from the City of Surprise. She said that she has been a member of the MAG Regional Council for many years. At the beginning of Apache Junction’s membership in MAG, only the Maricopa County portion of the City was represented, but then the Pinal County portion of Apache Junction was included. Councilmember Barker stated that the City of Apache Junction also has senior citizens, sick residents, poor residents, and residents with disabilities without transportation because they have no transit. She indicated that they feel they have been very patient and she added that they are not in the Sun Corridor. Councilmember Barker stated that the Sun Corridor will have a small impact on her city and on the Town of Florence. She noted that the City of Maricopa is in the Sun Corridor. Councilmember Barker stated that the City of Apache Junction and the Town of Florence are part of the region and would like to partake of the region. She expressed appreciation for the discussion. Councilmember Barker expressed she was tired of hearing in Pinal County about Big Brother MAG. She stated that Apache Junction is a part of this organization and benefits from MAG; they have infrastructure going in because of MAG that would not be going in otherwise. Councilmember Barker expressed her appreciation to MAG and would like the things they receive from MAG to continue. She stated that we need to behave like a region; she hears region followed by, “but my city...” We need to fit them together.

Mr. Jack Sellers stated that there have been comments regarding transit. He noted that Mr. Scott Smith, Valley Metro CEO, had provided a presentation at the East Valley Partnership regarding transit. Mr. Sellers said that if anyone wanted to understand how transit works in this region, they should invite Mr. Smith. He added that even though he has been involved in transportation for many years, he learned a lot.

Mayor Tom Schoaf stated that he and Mayor Price had a nice conversation on this difficult topic. He indicated that he was at MAG during many of the years described by Mr. Smith regarding the issues between the East Valley and the West Valley on a number of issues. Mayor Schoaf stated that the approved MAG Policies and Procedures were developed during this time to be implemented in a consistent way every time. He noted that if a change in a policy or process is required, it is vetted through MAG completely. Mayor Schoaf stated that this began as an issue at TPC. He indicated that he opposed the concept of Pinal County representatives in the leadership of the TPC. Mayor Schoaf stated that he would not be opposed to Pinal County representatives on the Executive Committee if it was restructured to have balance and parity of east, west, and central be maintained. He stated that there have been battles between the East Valley and the West Valley and most of the effects have gone away, but some are still present. Mayor Schoaf stated that he thought the effects had gone away due to the Policies and Procedures: a balance between east and west and a regular changeover in leadership allows the organization to deal with issues from a policy standpoint. He expressed his agreement with Mayor

-16- Wolcott that this is a good topic for discussion. Mayor Schoaf stated that it needs to go back through the MAG process for full vetting of issues. He expressed that the MAG staff and organization are possibly the greatest staff and organizations in the Valley and possibly the best MPO in the U.S. Mayor Schoaf stated that while he was Chair, MAG discussed things other than transportation. He stated that MAG is tasked with convincing the Legislature to allow a vote on the sales tax. Mayor Schoaf stated that if that does not happen, MAG will change dramatically. As we examine MAG’s leadership and structure, MAG must keep its eye on Proposition 500.

Mayor Georgia Lord expressed her appreciation for the discussion. She said to Mayor Price that she admired him and from the first she wanted him on the Regional Council. Mayor Lord stated that what is important is tax dollars and how they will be divided up. She noted that cities have worked on this for a long time and it is not that they do not care about Pinal members, because they do care. Mayor Lord stated that actions are taken on the established process. She stated that those tax dollars are very important to the cities. Mayor Lord stated that the West Valley includes masses of open land and is the fastest growing area in the State. She stated that there might be a group who could meet and discuss this, and she was willing to move a little bit, but the West Valley has waited a long time and is just at its beginning stage. Mayor Lord expressed that the half-cent sales tax money from Proposition 400 and Proposition 500 is very important to them. She added that it is nothing personal, they just need to figure out the problem mathematically meeting the needs of each city. Mayor Lord indicated that she was open to having a little more discussion on this and she hoped it would be done in a civil manner.

Mayor Jenn Daniels expressed that the best interests for the success of the region, not individual cities, should prevail. She remarked that she did not see major conflicts down the road if that occurs. Mayor Daniels stated that each agency has an interest in its own community, which is only natural, but when we sit at this table, it is about the region. She stated that this could be kicked back to the Management Committee or some other group, but more discussion is needed.

Mr. Dennis Smith stated that the City of Maricopa is not receiving funds from the half-cent sales tax. He then described how State Route 347 languished for years and MAG sent its staff to work on it, just like they did in Surprise with the Bell Road and Grand Avenue interchange. Mr. Smith noted that MAG paid attention. He said that the SR-347 project is probably the most important project to be built in the City of Maricopa, and it was done without sales tax funds. Mr. Smith stated that in leadership or not, it is an advantage to be a member of MAG. He added that he thought we need to be careful about tinkering with the organization. Mr. Smith stated that he felt the goal is Proposition 500 and the MAG Regional Council will decide who will be the figurehead of the organization. He stated that if Proposition 500 does not pass, transit will be in trouble along with a number of highway projects. Mr. Smith expressed that he felt the priority is to get through Proposition 500 – that is our core business.

Mayor Price said that he wanted to defray one of the philosophies he keeps hearing. Pinal County is planning to pursue its own sales tax. Mayor Price stated that 90 percent of the City of Maricopa workers commute into Maricopa County, so no one is more supportive of a strong road system than he. Mayor Price stated that one jurisdiction flows into another and they cannot separate; roads do not stop at the County line. Mayor Price expressed his agreement to be careful about tinkering, but we would simply be adjusting it on parity. He remarked that the Regional Council members are very intelligent people and can figure out solutions. Mayor Price noted that Proposition 500 is key to the City of Maricopa’s

-17- success, also. Mayor Price also emphasized that the Pinal County members do not intend to divert any of the sales tax funds or resources from the Maricopa County members. He noted that a leader who is neutral can be very beneficial during discussions of issues. Mayor Price suggested that the By-Laws could say that a non-Maricopa member who was an officer could go off the term of office during a Proposition election, and then go back on when the election was over. He added that he thought creative options could be found and all he was asking was to look at this from a parity standpoint.

Mr. Smith recalled the modeling done by MAG that showed 300,000 trips are project as coming out of Pinal County into Maricopa County in 2030. He noted that this workforce is very highly educated. Mr. Smith mentioned the Sun Corridor. At a JPAC meeting, Mr. Smith spoke to the Raytheon marketing manager, who mentioned that 185 of Raytheon’s supply chain are in the Valley. He noted that transportation is a system from the Valley, to Tucson, all the way to the border. We need to work effectively with all of the partners. Mr. Smith applauded Pinal County for their efforts on a sales tax, and if it passes, they will get a new North/South Highway, which is greatly needed. He noted the traffic jam he encountered on Ellsworth Road at 10:00 a.m. on a recent Sunday.

Chair Jackie Meck expressed his agreement with the statements by Mayor Wolcott, Mayor Schoaf, and Mayor Lord regarding the West Valley coming into its own. He noted that the City of Buckeye is the seventh fastest growing city in the U.S. with 50,000. Chair Meck stated that for the past five years, the City of Buckeye has worked with the City of Phoenix. He noted that Mayor Greg Stanton is the very first Phoenix Mayor to visit the City of Buckeye and he thanked Mayor Stanton for that. Chair Meck stated that Phoenix and Buckeye established a partnership that has bloomed. Chair Meck noted that he also has had many visits with Mayor John Giles, which he greatly appreciates. He stated that the City of Buckeye is the farthest west you can go in the MAG region, and there is nothing between it and Los Angeles. Chair Meck stated that he is a Buckeye native and understands that everyone has the same issues. He expressed his appreciation to Mayor Price for bringing forth this discussion. Chair Meck extended his appreciation to Mayor Stanton and Mayor Giles for being good friends to the West Valley.

11. Legislative Update

Mr. Nathan Pryor, MAG staff, stated that last week, the National Association of Regional Councils sent out a legislative alert regarding a continuing resolution for the budget. Mr. Pryor stated that the amendment contains the Woodall amendment that could impact how funding comes to the MAG region. He explained that when Congress makes appropriations, the funds flow to states and MPOs. Under the Woodall amendment, we could see rescission. Mr. Pryor explained that it is a budget balancing mechanism that would remove old projects from the books. He noted that the MAG region has done a good job to spend its federal dollars and when Congress removes old projects from the books, MAG is in a good position to use those dollars and those funds could potentially go away. Mr. Pryor stated that we will probably know more next month. He added that yesterday, National Association of Regional Councils staff spoke with Senate staff.

Ms. Teri Kennedy, MAG staff, continued the presentation. She said that the federal government wants to reduce federal funding to balance the budget. Ms. Kennedy noted that Contract Authority is the upper spending limit. It is based on negotiated estimated revenues as approved by the surface transportation act, and transportation program needs. Obligation Limitation is the actual dollar amount that annually

-18- the federal government approves based on revenues. It is the spending amount of actual dollars. Ms. Kennedy stated that difference between Contract Authority and Obligation Limitation in Arizona for FY 2017 is $64.6 million.

Ms. Kennedy stated that the August Redistribution occurs annually. The funding from the states that could not spend the funds is given to other states that perform well. Ms. Kennedy noted that Arizona received an additional $58.8 million in FY 2017 with a spending limit of $64.6 million. In 2017, the South Mountain Freeway received $23 million, and several other MAG projects received early funding, saving finance charges and interest.

Ms. Kennedy stated that the Woodall amendment proposes a ‘hair cut,’ reducing the Contract Authority to balance the federal books, but limits the state’s and the region’s ability to distribute funding to needed project types. Ms. Kennedy noted that the amendment could reduce CMAQ funds, and reduce flexibility in spending choice. She noted that after the ‘hair cut,’ in this example, MAG would be down to $27 million in contract authority, not the $58.8 million.

Ms. Kennedy stated that the Contract Authority was negotiated in the FAST Act. She explained that for years, MAG did not spend all of its federal funds, but for the past five years, MAG has implemented the federal fund policies and procedures. In the worst year, MAG left only seven-tenths of one percent on the table.

Mr. Pryor stated that they are tracking this legislation. Senate Appropriations staff is not leaning toward accepting this bill. Mr. Pryor stated that he would report on this next month.

Mr. Smith stated that if this Woodall amendment passes, it would take funds from transportation to build up the general fund. He noted that the Georgia Department of Transportation and AASHTO are promoting the amendment.

Mayor Wolcott asked the net benefit to the highway agencies. Mr. Smith replied that it would remove funds from highways.

Mayor W.J. Lane referenced MAG meeting the target over the past five years for spending its federal funds. He asked the consequence for meeting the target versus not meeting the target.

Ms. Kennedy explained that in fiscal years 2008 to 2012, MAG carried forward approximately $34 million per year. ADOT would have to come in with other projects that could spend the money left on the table or else the funds would get swept and put into the August Redistribution pot and sent back to Washington, D.C. Ms. Kennedy stated that MAG keeps a long list of ready-to-go projects that could utilize those funds. She stated that in August, the Executive Committee took action so that MAG could use all of its funds. Ms. Kennedy stated that they are not allowed to keep open projects too long. She noted that in FY 2016, MAG left seven-tenths of one percent on the table only because a large project finished and they did not have time to do a TIP amendment at the last minute.

Mayor Lane expressed kudos for the mechanisms staff has been utilizing over the past five years to spend the funds.

-19- Ms. Kennedy noted that the MAG Regional Council approved the policy in 2011, which allowed the closeout process to utilize the funding.

12. Request for Future Agenda Items

Topics or issues of interest that the Regional Council would like to have considered for discussion at a future meeting were requested.

No requests were noted.

13. Comments from the Council

An opportunity was provided for Regional Council members to present a brief summary of current events. The Regional Council is not allowed to propose, discuss, deliberate or take action at the meeting on any matter in the summary, unless the specific matter is properly noticed for legal action.

Chair Meck noted that the First Annual Mountain Bike Race in the White Tank Mountains in Verrado in the City of Buckeye will take place on November 4, 2017.

Chair Meck stated that the traveling Vietnam Memorial Wall will be on display at the City of Buckeye November 9-12, 2017, for the fourth year in a row. He stated that the City will also host a Veterans’ Day parade. Speakers include the commander of Luke Air Force Base and Congressman Gosar. Chair Meck stated that they invited Senator McCain, but he is committing to engagements on a day-to-day basis, and they will add him to the agenda if he attends.

Adjournment

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:25 p.m.

______Chair ______Secretary

-20- Agenda Item #5B

MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY... for your review

DATE: October 17, 2017

SUBJECT: Proposed Name Change From the MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee to the MAG Active Transportation Committee

SUMMARY: At the September meeting of the MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee, members voted to recommend changing its name to the MAG Active Transportation Committee. Initially, the committee was known as the MAG Regional Bicycle Task Force. Shortly thereafter, a MAG Pedestrian Working Group was formed. These groups met separately for a few years, then began meeting jointly. After a few more years, the group became the MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee. This name remained for several years and now, as a response to the changing landscape of multimodal planning, the committee recognizes the need to evolve to better represent the body of work which they are undertaking. There are a number of cities, towns, other metropolitan planning organizations and departments of transportation around the country that have embraced active transportation planning. Several have active transportation plans, committees and programs. In addition, the United States Department of Transportation recognizes the relationship between active transportation, public health and equality: Investing in public transportation and bicycle and pedestrian facilities creates opportunities for people to exercise. This helps reduce obesity and the risks for developing costly chronic conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Active transportation facilities are particularly important in low-income and minority communities, or communities with high percentages of new immigrants. People in those communities are less likely to own vehicles, and unsafe streets might pose a barrier to using active transportation. PUBLIC INPUT: None has been received. PROS & CONS: PROS: The name change will more accurately reflect the committee’s body of work and keep MAG at the forefront of the multimodal planning and programming landscape. CONS: None. TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS: TECHNICAL: None. POLICY: This name change will further encourage the development of regional active transportation facilities. ACTION NEEDED: Approval of changing the name of the MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee to the MAG Active Transportation Committee. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: On October 11, 2017, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of changing the name of the MAG Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee to the MAG Active Transportation Committee. MEMBERS ATTENDING Patrick Banger, Gilbert, Chair Julie Arendell for Jeff Tyne, Peoria # David Fitzhugh, Avondale, Vice Chair Clark Princell for Ed Zuercher, Phoenix * Bryant Powell, Apache Junction # Himonshu Patel for Greg Stanley, Pinal Roger Klingler, Buckeye County Gary Neiss, Carefree Jamie Bennett for John Kross, Queen * Carrie Dyrek, Cave Creek Creek Marsha Reed, Chandler * Bryan Meyers, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Dr. Spencer Isom, El Mirage Indian Community # Brent Billingsley, Florence Brad Lundahl for Jim Thompson, * Phil Dorchester, Fort McDowell Scottsdale Yavapai Nation Bob Wingenroth, Surprise Grady Miller, Fountain Hills Andrew Ching, Tempe Michael Celaya, Gila Bend * Reyes Medrano, Jr., Tolleson * Pamela Thompson, Gila River Indian Aaron White for Vince Lorefice, Community Wickenburg Kevin Phelps, Glendale * Jeanne Blackman, Youngtown Rob Bohr for Brian Dalke, Goodyear Floyd Roehrich for John Halikowski, ADOT * Bob Thaxton, Guadalupe Reid Spaulding for Joy Rich, Maricopa # Sonny Culbreth, Litchfield Park County Gregory Rose, City of Maricopa John Farry for Scott Smith, Christopher Brady, Mesa Valley Metro/RPTA Kevin Burke, Paradise Valley

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Participated by telephone conference call. + Participated by videoconference call. On September 19, 2017, the MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee recommended approval of changing the name of the MAG Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee to the MAG Active Transportation Committee.

MEMBERS ATTENDING Jim Hash, Mesa, Chair Reed Kempton, MCDOT Jose Macias, El Mirage, Vice Chair # Randy Proch, Peoria Michael Sanders, ADOT Katherine Coles, Phoenix Stephanie Bubenheim, Apache Junction Sarah Mertins, Queen Creek # Ken Galica, Avondale Susan Conklu, Scottsdale Robert Wisener, Buckeye Stephen Chang, Surprise # Stacy Bridge-Denzak, Carefree # Eric Iwersen, Tempe Ian Cordwell, Cave Creek Amanda Lueker, Valley Metro # Jason Crampton, Chandler * Robert Carmona, Wickenburg Kristin Myers, Gilbert # Grant Anderson, Youngtown Dory Ludwig for Stephanie Stearns, Tiffany Halperin, American Society of Glendale Landscape Architects # Steve Careccia, Goodyear Bob Beane, Coalition of Arizona Bicyclists Jeff King, FHWA-Arizona # Bryan Hughes, Florence * Mike Gillespie, Litchfield Park Kenneth Steel, MCDPH * Ryan Wozniak, Maricopa

* Members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Attended via audio-conference CONTACT PERSON: Jason Stephens, MAG, (602) 452-5004 Agenda Item #5C

Maricopa Association of Governments Table A. ALCP Project Changes to the Fiscal Year 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and the FY 2018 Arterial Life Cycle Program1 ALCP - IN TIP 9/8/2017 TIP # Agency Project Location Project Fiscal Est. Date Length Lanes Lanes Fund Local Cost Federal Cost Regional Total Cost Reimb. Fund Regional Notes: RTP ID Description Year Open (miles) Before After Type Cost Fiscal Type Reimb. TRACS Year Amend: Advance listing from FFY2018 to FFY2017 to use MAG's MMA18- Maricopa Northern Parkway: Design Roadway STBGP- STBGP- 2017 Dec-20 0.1 0 4 (782,837) 782,837 - - 2017 782,837 FFY2017 OA. Listing represents an ACI-NOR-10-03-E

113DZ County Dysart Overpass Overpass (reimb) MAG MAG SZ092 advance construction conversion and is financial only.

1. Rows in the report are sorted in order by the following columns: Agency, RTP ID, Project Description, Fiscal Year, and Fund Type. Changes are in red font. Deletions are show in strike through font. Yellow highlight represents changes made since Management Committee.

1 / 1 Agenda Item #5D

MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY... for your review

DATE: October 17, 2017

SUBJECT: MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Element/Funding Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program

SUMMARY: Each year, the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Managers submit inventory and upgrade requests that are used to develop a five-year equipment program that forecasts future 9-1-1 equipment needs of the region and will enable MAG to provide estimates of future needs to the Arizona Department of Administration (ADOA) for funding. The funding request for FY 2019 is required to be submitted to the ADOA by December 15, 2017.

The ADOA Order of Adoption stipulates allowable funding under the Emergency Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund. The Emergency Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund is funded by the monthly 9-1-1 excise tax on wireline and wireless telephones. The 9-1-1 excise tax is currently 20 cents per month, which is the lowest monthly 9-1-1 collection in the United States. The State 9-1-1 Office has determined that sufficient revenue will be collected to allow for continued network and equipment maintenance services, but no capital expenditures to replace aging 9-1-1 will be funded until near the end of the fiscal year when budget overages are determined. The State 9-1-1 Office has indicated the 9-1-1 funds will not cover reimbursements for logging recorders, additional 9-1-1 call taking positions, and new PSAPs.

PUBLIC INPUT: None.

PROS & CONS: PROS: The five-year equipment program assists the MAG 9-1-1 Oversight Team to forecast future equipment needs of the region and will enable MAG to provide estimates regarding future funding needs to ADOA.

CONS: None.

TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS: TECHNICAL: None.

POLICY: The process for approval of the PSAP funding request and five-year equipment program, which includes recommendations from the MAG 9-1-1 Oversight Team and Management Committee and approval by the Regional Council, demonstrates greater participation by management.

ACTION NEEDED: Approval of the MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Element/Funding Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program.

1 PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: On October 11, 2017, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of the MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Element/Funding Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program.

MEMBERS ATTENDING Patrick Banger, Gilbert, Chair Kevin Burke, Paradise Valley # David Fitzhugh, Avondale, Vice Chair Julie Arendell for Jeff Tyne, Peoria * Bryant Powell, Apache Junction Clark Princell for Ed Zuercher, Phoenix Roger Klingler, Buckeye # Himonshu Patel for Greg Stanley, Pinal Co. Gary Neiss, Carefree Jamie Bennett for John Kross, Queen * Carrie Dyrek, Cave Creek Creek Marsha Reed, Chandler * Bryan Meyers, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Dr. Spencer Isom, El Mirage Indian Community # Brent Billingsley, Florence Brad Lundahl for Jim Thompson, * Phil Dorchester, Fort McDowell Scottsdale Yavapai Nation Bob Wingenroth, Surprise Grady Miller, Fountain Hills Andrew Ching, Tempe Michael Celaya, Gila Bend * Reyes Medrano, Jr., Tolleson * Pamela Thompson, Gila River Indian Aaron White for Vince Lorefice, Community Wickenburg Kevin Phelps, Glendale * Jeanne Blackman, Youngtown Rob Bohr for Brian Dalke, Goodyear Floyd Roehrich for John Halikowski, ADOT * Bob Thaxton, Guadalupe Reid Spaulding for Joy Rich, Maricopa Co. # Sonny Culbreth, Litchfield Park John Farry for Scott Smith, Gregory Rose, City of Maricopa Valley Metro/RPTA Christopher Brady, Mesa

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Participated by telephone conference call. + Participated by videoconference call.

On September 28, 2017, the MAG 9-1-1 Oversight Team recommended approval of the MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Element/Funding Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program.

MEMBERS ATTENDING John Locklin, Mesa Fire Department, Chair P. Jay Strebeck, Phoenix Fire Department Jeff McMenemy, Glendale Fire Department, Jesse Cooper, Phoenix Police Department Vice Chair # Karen Sutherland for Tom Melton, Pat Lopez for Maricopa County Sheriff's Scottsdale Police Department Office * Brenda Buren, Tempe Police Department Roy Minter, Peoria Police Department George Good, Tolleson Fire Department

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Attended by telephone conference call. + Attended by videoconference call.

On August 10, 2017, the MAG Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Managers Group recommended approval of the MAG FY 2019 PSAP Annual Element/Funding Request and FY 2019-2023 Equipment Program.

MEMBERS ATTENDING * Domela Finnessey, Surprise Police Michelle Potts, Chandler Police Department, Department, Chair Vice Chair

2 Lisa Eminhizer, Apache Junction Police * Rachel Harris, Salt River Department Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Police Mike Folia, Avondale Police Department Department Jim Tortora, Buckeye Police Department Karen Sutherland, Scottsdale Police * Stephanie Beebe, Ft. McDowell Yavapai Department Nation # Patrick Cutts, Tempe Police Department * Janet Laird, Gilbert Police Department Toni Rogers, Tolleson Police Department Loretta Hadlock, Glendale Police Department * Ken Lutkiewicz, Wickenburg Police # Chris Nadeau, Goodyear Police Department Department Jim Stilwell, Maricopa County Sheriff's @ Trish Pryce, ASU Police Department Office @ Lynn Koliboski, DPS Christine Pantoja-Young for Cari Zanella, # @ David Demers, Luke AFB Fire Department Mesa Police Department @ Doreen Wasick, Mesa Fire & Medical Shauna Henrie, Paradise Valley Police Department Department @ Martha Johnson, Phoenix Fire Department Anje Reimer, Peoria Police Department * @ Kirk Schmitt, Rural Metro Fire # Dan McNemee, Phoenix Police Department Department/Southwest Ambulance

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. @ Ex-Officio member # Attended by Teleconference + Attended by videoconference

CONTACT PERSON: Liz Graeber, Phoenix Fire Department, 602-534-9775, or Nathan Pryor, MAG, 602-254-6300.

3 MAG FY 2019 PSAP ANNUAL ELEMENT/FUNDING REQUEST SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION: Maricopa Region 9-1-1 CONTACT: Liz Graeber AGENCY SUBMITTING: Phoenix Fire Department TELEPHONE #: (602) 534-9775 ADDRESS: 150 S. 12th St., Phoenix, AZ 85034 DATE: 20-Jul-17 Calendar Year 2018 2019 TOTAL Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Wireline Maintenance: $1,800,996 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 $150,083 911 Monthly Service: $2,880,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 Customer Premise Equipment $2,734,000 $2,734,000 Special Projects/Misc maintenance $630,000 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 $52,500 Wireless Maintenance: $324,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 911 Monthly Service: $684,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 $57,000 Addressing/Mapping/GIS $44,000 $11,000 $11,000 $11,000 $11,000 NG911 $1,200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Special Projects $2,200,000 $2,200,000 FY TOTALS $12,496,996 $5,571,583 $626,583 $626,583 $637,583 $626,583 $626,583 $637,583 $626,583 $626,583 $637,583 $626,583 $626,583 Equipment: Upgrade Peripherals $50,000 Apache Junction 911 System Upgrade $153,000 **Projects are also included in FY2018 as conditional. ASU PD 911 System Upgrade** $153,000 Avondale PD 911 System Upgrade** $236,000 Buckeye 911 System Upgrade $200,000 Chandler 911 System Upgrade $400,000 Fort McDowell PD 911 System Upgrade** $122,000 Gilbert PD 911 System Upgrade** $325,000 Peoria PD 911 System Upgrade** $387,000 Equipment figures are only estimates - will have Tolleson PD 911 System Upgrade $122,000 Wickenburg PD 911 System Upgrade $122,000 preliminary quotes before submitting to ADOA Avondale PD Logging Recorder $100,000 Mesa Fire 2 Positions $88,000 Mesa PD 4 Positions $176,000 Wickenburg PD Logging Recorder $100,000 Equipment Total $2,734,000 Budget table FY2019 10/3/2017 MAG FY2019-2023 PSAP Equipment Program

FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Apache Junction PD ASU PD Avondale PD Logging Recorder No Request No Request No Requests PSAP Move Buckeye PD PSAP Move No Request No Request No Requests No Requests Chandler PD No Requests No Request No Request No Requests No Requests DPS No Requests No Request No Request No Requests No Requests Ft. McDowell Gilbert PD No Requests No Request No Request No Requests No Requests Glendale PD No Requests No Request No Request No Requests No Requests Goodyear PD No Requests No Request Logging Recorder 1 Position No Requests Luke AFB MCSO No Requests Logging Recorder No Request No Requests No Requests Mesa Fire 2 Positions 2 Positions 2 Positions 2 Positions 2 Positions Mesa PD 4 Positions, PSAP Move Logging Recorder No Request No Requests No Requests Paradise Valley PD Peoria PD No Requests Logging Recorder No Request No Requests No Request Phoenix Fire No Requests Logging Recorder No Request No Requests No Requests Phoenix PD No Requests No Requests No Requests No Requests No Requests Rural Metro PD Salt River PD Scottsdale PD No Requests No Request No Request No Requests No Requests Surprise PD No Requests No Request No Request 1 Position No Requests Tempe PD No Requests No Requests No Requests No Requests No Requests Tolleson PD No Requests No Request No Request No Requests Logging Recorder Wickenburg PD Logging Recorder No Request No Request No Requests No Requests

10/3/2017 Agenda Item #5E

MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY... for your review

DATE: October 17, 2017

SUBJECT: Projects for the MAG FY 2018 Traffic Signal Optimization Program

SUMMARY: The FY2018 MAG Unified Planning Work Program and Annual Budget, approved by the Regional Council in May 2017, includes $300,000 for Traffic Signal Optimization Program (TSOP) projects. On August 1, 2017, MAG announced a request for new projects for the FY 2018 TSOP. Eleven (11) project applications were received for signal timing coordination improvements on several arterial streets, affecting nine local jurisdictions and one state agency. One of the projects was withdrawn from the list by the local agency. The MAG Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Committee reviewed all project applications and recommended a list that includes ten (10) proposed TSOP projects along with two additional projects. The two additional projects involve: (1) performing an evaluation of before-and- after traffic conditions for three of the projects; (2) conducting a regional workshop on traffic signal timing software. The estimated cost for all twelve (12) recommended projects is $300,000. All projects will be carried out using qualified on-call consultants under contract with MAG.

Since its inception in 2004, the MAG Traffic Signal Optimization Program (TSOP) has successfully completed more than 100 projects that have helped improve traffic signal timing at more than 1,200 intersections across the region. Projects launched through this program provide technical assistance to member agencies for improving traffic signal coordination, optimization and review of operations through simulation modeling. Technical assistance is provided by consultants under contract with MAG to provide on-call consulting services.

Traffic signal optimization is one of the most cost-effective ways to improve traffic movement and make our streets safer and efficient. Signal optimization is performed for any or all of the following reasons:

C To adjust signal timing to account for changes in traffic patterns due to new developments and traffic growth

C To reduce motorist frustration and unsafe driving by reducing stops and delay

C To improve traffic flow through a group of signals, thereby reducing emissions and fuel consumption

C To postpone the need for costly long-term road capacity improvement by improving the traffic flow using existing resources

A recent evaluation by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) of a FY 2016 MAG TSOP project that involved both City of Phoenix and ADOT traffic signals, has been found to produce a benefit to cost ratio of 86 to 1. This program, enthusiastically championed by the MAG Intelligent

1 Transportation Systems Committee, provides traffic engineering assistance for refining signal operations across the MAG region. These projects do not require a local match.

PUBLIC INPUT: At the October 11, 2017, MAG Management Committee meeting, a citizen noted that Indian School Road was not on the TSOP project list and that something needed to be done to relieve the traffic congestion.

PROS & CONS: PROS: The proposed TSOP projects, when implemented, will result in improved traffic operations and reductions in gasoline consumption and vehicular emissions.

CONS: None.

TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS: TECHNICAL: It is essential that local agency technical staff participate in coordinating the execution of these projects by the designated MAG on-call consultant.

POLICY: None.

ACTION NEEDED: Approval of the list of Traffic Signal Optimization Program projects for FY 2018.

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: On October 11, 2017, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of the list of TSOP projects for FY 2018.

MEMBERS ATTENDING Patrick Banger, Gilbert, Chair Christopher Brady, Mesa # David Fitzhugh, Avondale, Vice Chair Kevin Burke, Paradise Valley * Bryant Powell, Apache Junction Julie Arendell for Jeff Tyne, Peoria Roger Klingler, Buckeye Clark Princell for Ed Zuercher, Phoenix Gary Neiss, Carefree # Himonshu Patel for Greg Stanley, Pinal * Carrie Dyrek, Cave Creek County Marsha Reed, Chandler Jamie Bennett for John Kross, Queen Creek Dr. Spencer Isom, El Mirage * Bryan Meyers, Salt River Pima-Maricopa # Brent Billingsley, Florence Indian Community * Phil Dorchester, Fort McDowell Brad Lundahl for Jim Thompson, Scottsdale Yavapai Nation Bob Wingenroth, Surprise Grady Miller, Fountain Hills Andrew Ching, Tempe Michael Celaya, Gila Bend * Reyes Medrano, Jr., Tolleson * Pamela Thompson, Gila River Indian Aaron White for Vince Lorefice, Wickenburg Community * Jeanne Blackman, Youngtown Kevin Phelps, Glendale Floyd Roehrich for John Halikowski, ADOT Rob Bohr for Brian Dalke, Goodyear Reid Spaulding for Joy Rich, Maricopa * Bob Thaxton, Guadalupe County # Sonny Culbreth, Litchfield Park John Farry for Scott Smith, Gregory Rose, City of Maricopa Valley Metro/RPTA

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Participated by telephone conference call. + Participated by videoconference call.

2 On September 27, 2017, the MAG Transportation Review Committee recommended approval of the list of TSOP projects for FY 2018.

MEMBERS ATTENDING Avondale: David Janover # Maricopa (City): Bill Fay ADOT: Clem Ligocki for Gregory Byres Maricopa County: Jennifer Toth Apache Junction: Mike Wever Mesa: Jeff Martin for R. J. Zeder Buckeye: Jose Heredia for Scott Lowe Peoria: Adina Lund * Cave Creek: Dave Peterson Phoenix: Ray Dovalina Chandler: Dan Cook, Chair # Pinal County: Scott Bender for Louis El Mirage: Jorge Gastelum Andersen * Florence: Chris Salas Queen Creek: Mohamed Youssef # Fountain Hills: Randy Harrel Scottsdale: Lisa Johnson for Paul Basha Gila River Indian Community: Tim Oliver Surprise: Karl Zook Gilbert: Rene Guillen Tempe: Shelly Seyler Glendale: Patrick Sage for Debbie Albert * Tolleson: Jamie McCracken # Goodyear: Rebecca Zook Valley Metro: John Farry * Guadalupe: Robert Thaxton * Wickenburg: Vince Lorefice * Litchfield Park:Woody Scoutten # Youngtown: Grant Anderson

EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ATTENDING * Street Committee: Kini Knudson, Phoenix * Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee: Jim Hash, * ITS Committee: Chris Hamilton, Mesa Avondale * Transportation Safety Committee: Dana # FHWA: Ed Stillings Alvidrez, City of Chandler

* Members neither present nor represented by proxy. + Attended by Videoconference # Attended by Audioconference

On September 13, 2017, the MAG Intelligent Transportation Systems Committee recommended approval of the list of TSOP projects for FY 2018.

MEMBERS ATTENDING Avondale: Chris Hamilton, Chair Glendale: Allan Galicia for Debbie Albert Tempe: David Lucas,Vice Chair Goodyear: Luke Albert ADOT: Susan Anderson Maricopa County: April Wire for Apache Junction: Raquel Schatz Nicolaas Swart * ASU: Yingyan Lou Mesa: Tricia Boyer # Buckeye: Paul Lopez for Tammy Peoria: Steve McKenzie Valadez Paz Phoenix: Bruce Littleton Chandler: Mike Mah Queen Creek: Jamie Bennett for DPS: Sgt. Jesus Gastelum Mohamad Youssef El Mirage: Bryce Christo Scottsdale: Leslie Bubke * FHWA: Jennifer Brown Surprise: Albert Garcia # Gilbert: Rajnish Gupta # Valley Metro: Jay Yenerich

*Members neither present nor represented by proxy. + Attended by Videoconference # Attended by Audioconference

CONTACT PERSON: Sarath Joshua (602) 254-6300.

3 4 Agenda Item #5F

MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY... for your review

DATE: October 17, 2017

SUBJECT: Central Arizona Governments Loan Request

SUMMARY: The Central Arizona Governments (CAG) has requested that MAG enter into a loan agreement to assist them with $776,983 in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2018 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) suballocated Highway Safety Improvement Program funds (HSIP) that they cannot utilize this year due to project delays. CAG requests that the funding amount of $776,983 be returned in FFY 2019 Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP-MAG) funds.

The proposed CAG loan would have no negative impacts to the MAG region and would allow MAG projects during FHWA suballocated funding closeout, and/or Arterial Life Cycle Program projects to receive advanced funding.

Loan, repayment, and general terms: • No interest, no inflation, nor fees will be applied to the loan. • Project sponsors must complete conversion/authorization of funding by June 1, 2018.

MAG’s ability to accept advancement of funding: • MAG has projects that could accept advancement, or conversion of federal aid. • MAG has successfully addressed ADOT concerns with the FHWA suballocated funding and annual carry forward of funding that is at risk for five consecutive years. MAG is projected to use all FHWA suballocated funding for FFY 2018.

PUBLIC INPUT: None.

PROS & CONS: PROS: Loan agreements between councils of governments (COG)s and metropolitan planning organizations (MPO)s of federal funding assists other COGs and MPOS with ensuring that funding is not lost to their region. Early advancement of funding to the MAG region helps keep overall project budget costs down by reducing inflationary costs, interest payments on loans or bonding, and may assist with keeping a project on schedule and/or early opening of the facility.

CONS: Additional MAG staff time of minimal accounting, project tracking, and agency coordination is required.

1 TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS: TECHNICAL: Federal Fiscal Year 2018 and 2019 funding projections have been prepared by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and MAG, and the request can be met.

POLICY: This advancement of funding follows the MAG Federal Fund Guidelines, the Arterial Life Cycle Program Policies and Procedures, and meets ADOT requirements for annual suballocated federal funds and loans.

ACTION NEEDED: Approval to enter into a loan agreement with the Central Arizona Governments (CAG) in the amount of $776,983 in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Program funds to be utilized in the MAG region, and for repayment by MAG to CAG in FFY 2019 for $776,983, in Surface Transportation Block Grant Program funds.

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: On October 11, 2017, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval to enter into a loan agreement with the Central Arizona Governments (CAG) in the amount of $776,983 in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Program funds to be utilized in the MAG region, and for repayment by MAG to CAG in FFY 2019 for $776,983, in Surface Transportation Block Grant Program funds.

MEMBERS ATTENDING Patrick Banger, Gilbert, Chair Kevin Burke, Paradise Valley # David Fitzhugh, Avondale, Vice Chair Julie Arendell for Jeff Tyne, Peoria * Bryant Powell, Apache Junction Clark Princell for Ed Zuercher, Phoenix Roger Klingler, Buckeye # Himonshu Patel for Greg Stanley, Pinal Gary Neiss, Carefree County * Carrie Dyrek, Cave Creek Jamie Bennett for John Kross, Queen Marsha Reed, Chandler Creek Dr. Spencer Isom, El Mirage * Bryan Meyers, Salt River Pima-Maricopa # Brent Billingsley, Florence Indian Community * Phil Dorchester, Fort McDowell Brad Lundahl for Jim Thompson, Scottsdale Yavapai Nation Bob Wingenroth, Surprise Grady Miller, Fountain Hills Andrew Ching, Tempe Michael Celaya, Gila Bend * Reyes Medrano, Jr., Tolleson * Pamela Thompson, Gila River Indian Aaron White for Vince Lorefice, Wickenburg Community * Jeanne Blackman, Youngtown Kevin Phelps, Glendale Floyd Roehrich for John Halikowski, ADOT Rob Bohr for Brian Dalke, Goodyear Reid Spaulding for Joy Rich, Maricopa * Bob Thaxton, Guadalupe County # Sonny Culbreth, Litchfield Park John Farry for Scott Smith, Gregory Rose, City of Maricopa Valley Metro/RPTA Christopher Brady, Mesa

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Participated by telephone conference call. + Participated by videoconference call.

CONTACT PERSON: Teri Kennedy, MAG, (602) 254-6300

2 Agenda Item #6

MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY... for your review

DATE: October 17, 2017

SUBJECT: Recommendation of a Name for the Future Arizona State Route 30 Freeway

SUMMARY: On September 27, 2017, the MAG Regional Council approved the 31-mile Arizona State Route 30 (SR-30), from SR-85 in Buckeye to Interstate 17/Black Canyon in Phoenix, as a future freeway corridor in the funded MAG Regional Transportation Plan’s Regional Freeway and Highway Program. In addition, on April 26, 2017, the MAG Regional Council adopted a Tentative Scenario for rebalancing the Regional Freeway and Highway Program, which includes a phase I (interim) facility for 15-miles of SR-30 between Loop 303 in Goodyear and Loop 202/South Mountain in Phoenix.

It has been suggested that this new corridor in the Southwest Valley be named the “Tres Rios,” in addition to its Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) designation of Arizona State Route 30. This name recognizes the three rivers (Tres Rios) and their confluence located near the new freeway corridor: Gila River, Salt River, and Aqua Fria River. Furthermore, Avondale, Buckeye, Goodyear, and Phoenix recognize the community heritage that these three rivers represent to this area of the Valley.

In regard to naming freeways and highways in the MAG region, the Arizona Department of Transportation in 1986 suggested MAG provide recommendations for naming segments of the Regional Freeway and Highway Program. On June 27, 1986, the MAG Regional Council approved the process naming these segments:

• names are to be related to Arizona natural features, landmarks, or native-American names;

• names should not exceed 13-letters; and

• the facility type should not be indicated in the recommendation.

MAG staff believes the Tres Rios name meets these guidelines. Attached to this Transmittal Summary are agendas, minutes, and attachments from 1986 outlining the naming process used by the MAG Regional Council in the past for naming Regional Freeway and Highway Program segments. Also attached is information from 1993 summarizing the last action taken by the MAG Regional Council on segment naming. A third attachment is a map illustrating the currently recognized names of the segments of the MAG Regional Freeway and Highway Program.

If the MAG Regional Council approves this recommendation, it will be forwarded for consideration by the Arizona State Board on Geographic and Historic Names. This board is enabled under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) §§ 41-835 - 41-838 to evaluate all proposals for changes in or additions to names of geographic features and places of historical significance in the State of Arizona.

1 PUBLIC INPUT: No public input has been received on this matter.

PROS & CONS: PROS: Segments named in the MAG Regional Freeway and Highway Program provide the public with geographic references to aid in their navigation of the system. For example, the segment of Loop 202 between US-60/Superstition and I-10/Maricopa in the Southeast Valley, is named “Santan Freeway” given its proximity to the Santan Mountains in this portion of the metropolitan area. Naming SR-30 “Tres Rios” provides future users of the corridor with a reference to its proximity to the Salt River, Gila River, and Agua Fria River, and their confluence, as well as honors the heritage these geographic features represent to the Cities of Avondale, Buckeye, Goodyear, and Phoenix.

CONS: None perceived at this time.

TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS: TECHNICAL: The 9-character “Tres Rios” name (including the space) is fewer than the 13- characters recommended by ADOT for segment names. This allows for easy printing on directional signs and placards that will be posted with the route shield in the future SR-30 corridor. It is important to note that the name is recommended as an additional identification for the corridor, not as a replacement to the ADOT designation of the future corridor as Arizona State Route 30.

POLICY: The “Tres Rios” name meets the 1986 segment naming policy approved by the MAG Regional Council.

ACTION NEEDED: Approval of naming the Arizona State Route 30 corridor as “Tres Rios.”

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: This item is on the October 18, 2017, Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) agenda. The TPC is requested to recommend the name Tres Rios to the MAG Regional Council. An update will be provided on action taken by the TPC.

CONTACT PERSON: Bob Hazlett, MAG Senior Engineering Project Manager, (602) 254-6300.

2

MINUTES OF THE

MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

REGIONAL COUNCIL MEETING

June 25, 19&6 Executive Park Hotel, Phoenix

MEMBERS ATTENDING

Supervisor Fred Koory, Jr. Mayor Chauncey Coor, Goodyear Maricopa County, Chairman Mayor Anna Hernanzez, Guadalupe Mayor Terry Goddard, Phoenix, Mayor Al Brooks, Mesa Vice Chairman *Councilmember James Coffee, Mayor L.J. Reed, Gilbert, Treasurer Paradise Valley Mayor Lowell Riefkohl, Avondale Mayor Ron Travers, Peoria Mayor Joe Schettino, Buckeye * Mayor Herb Drinkwater, Scottsdale * Mayor Merritt Bigelow, Carefree Mayor George Cumbie, Surprise Mayor Jerry Brooks, Chandler, Mayor Harry Mitchell, Tempe Vice Mayor John A. Garza, Mayor Charles Hayes, Tolleson EI Mirage * Mayor Alvin Green, Youngtown Mayor Ray Cassel, Gila Bend Mayor Jim Mason, Wickenburg Mayor George Renner, Glendale Jim Patterson, ADOT

*Those members neither present nor represented by proxy.

1. CALL TO ORDER

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Koory at 6:05 p.m. Mayor Goddard introduced members of the Phoenix City Council and staff who were in attendance. Chairman Koory also introduced George Campbell Chairman of the Maricopa Board of Supervisors who was in attendance. '

2. APPROVAL OF MAY 28,1986 MINUTES

Chairman Koory indicated that a correction to the minutes had been distributed to the Regionql Council and that 'it should be noted in adopting the minutes. Mayor Hayes moved and Mayor Travers seconded the motion to adopt the May 28, 1986 meeting minutes as corrected. The motion carried unanimously.

3. ADOT UPDATE

Chairman Koory indicated that because of a tight time schedule for Charles Miller from the Arizona Department of Transportation, the addendum to the agenda would be considere-d before the other agenda items. Charles Miller, Director of Arizona Department of Transportation, was introduced to the Council members and he proceeded to outline the bonding program that ADOT is preparing for the 1/2¢ sales tax funds. Mr. Miller indicated that ADOThas received the construction priorities from MAG and accelerated the MAG Regional Council Freeway/Expressway Plan. He indicated that to provide for the amount of construction needed it would be necessary to have a bond sale and the sale of bonds is anticipated in July of this year. The amount of the bond sale is expected to be in the range of $185 million to $200 million for the first sale~ Delivery of , I the bonds is expected on August 6, i 986. As an indication of the bond market, Mr. Miller informed the Council that recently Highway User Revenue Bonds had been sold by ADOT and they did very well in the market. Upon completion of his presentation, Chairman Koory thanked Mr. Miller for his comments and the update to the MAG Regional Council.

4. ADOPTION OF REGIONAL AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN

Harry Wolfe from the MAG staff outlined to the Council members the completed study process for the MAG Regional Aviation System Plan. He reported that the impetus for the study came from a group of vaUey mayors in 1982 who recommended that MAG update its 1979 Regional Aviation System Plan. Harry indicated that the draft update was conducted in three phases. These phases had been previously presented to the MAG Regional Council and now the final report has been prepared by the consultant Peat Marwick Mitchell, Inc. Harry informed the Council that the MAG Regional Aviation System Plan Committee had unanimously adopted the recommendation of Peat Marwick Mitchell and also the MAG Management Committee had unanimously adopted the consultant recommendation. Mr. Wolfe referred the Regional Council members to Scenario 4 and the accompanying implementation actions as the recommended Regional Aviation System Plan for the MAG region. Mayor Jerry Brooks moved and Mayor L.J. Reed seconded the motion to adopt Scenario 4 and the accompanying implementation actions as the recommended Regional Aviation System Plan for the MAG region. The motion carried unanimously.

5. PROCESS FOR NAMING SEGMENTS OF THE MAG FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM

Roger Herzog informed the Council that recently ADOT had suggested that MAG provide recommendations to the ADOT Board for names of the different segments of the MAG Freeway/Expressway system. He referred to the various segments that could be named and requested that the MAG member agencies recommend names in writing no later than September 1 to the MAG staff. He indicated that if this process is adopted that the names would be considered by the MAG Management Committee and the Regional Council in September before being forwarded to the ADOT Transportation Board for their October meeting. It was also indicated that ADOT had suggested that names and limits for the following existing facilities be officially confirmed: Black Canyon, Grand, Hohokam, Maricopa, Papago, Squaw Peak and Superstition. Roger reported that ADOT is also requesting some consistency in the names and that they be related to Arizona natural features, landmarks, or Indian names. It was also indicated that ADOT has suggested not using more than 13 letters in the names for signing purposes. Several of the Regional Council members indicated an interest in providing names for the different freeway elements and Mayor Coor from Goodyear thanked ADOT for providing MAG the opportunity to assist in naming the various freeway segments. Following the discussion Mayor Coor moved and Mayor Hayes seconded the motion to approve the process for naming the segments of the MAG Freeway/Expressway Plan. The motion carried unanimousl y.

6. AIR QUALITY UPDATE

Lindy Bauer provided a report to the Regional Council regarding the health effects of ozone pollution, the meteorological data for the two ozone exceedence days in 1985, the impact of Stage II vapor recovery on ozone pollution, the effects of implementing Stage II vapor recovery in Maricopa County and the status of the new MAG Carbon Monoxide Plan. In reviewing the status of the new MAG Carbon Monoxide Plan,she indicated that because of an overall heavy workload, the Arizona Department of Health Services has indicated that they are not in a pOSItlOn to evaluate the additional control measures requested by MAG. To remedy this situation a meeting of the Air Quality Policy Team was conducted to discuss this problem and the consensus was that a contract amendment with Systems Applications Inc. should be pursued to undertake the modeling analysis normally performed by ADHS. Ms. Bauer indicated that negotiations with S.A.I. are currently under way for this additional work and it is anticipated that a budget of $100,000 will be available for the additional work. The funding could be provided by ADOT and the Maricopa County Highway Department. Ms. Bauer indicated that there was no action needed at this time on the air quality update items.

7. ELECTION OF MAG REGIONAL COUNCIL OFFICERS

Chairman Koory indicated to the members of the Regional Council that Mayor Renner, as past Regional Council Chairman, serves as the Chairman of the MAG Nominating Committee. Mayor Renner then addressed the Council and referenced the meeting of the MAG Nominating Committee and also noted the other members of the committee as Mayor Al Brooks, Mesa; Mayor Charles Hayes, Tolleson; Mayor 1. J. Reed, Gilbert and Mayor Ron Travers from Peoria. Mayor Renner indicated that the Nominating Committee had met and recommended a slate of officers for the next year including: Chairman, Mayor Terry Goddard; Vice Chairman, Mayor Jerry Brooks and Treasurer Mayor Chauncey Coor. Mayor Renner then moved the slate of officers and Mayor Ron" Travers seconded the motion. Chairman Koory then asked if there were any nominations from the floor for Chairman, Vice Chairman "or Treasurer. Hearing none, the nominations were closed. Chairman Koory then requested the vote for the Treasurer position for Mayor Chauncey Coor. The vote was unanimous. The position of Vice Chairman for Mayor Jerry Brooks was then voted upon and the vote was unanimous. The vote for the Chairman position for Mayor Goddard was then requested and the vote was unanimous. Following the election of the new MAG officers, Chairman Koory commented on the high quality of the MAG organization and the interesting and momentous subjects that the Regional Council had played an integral part In during the last· two years. He also complimented the Regional Council members, stating that he had not witnessed any personal animosity among the councilmembers in conducting their job. Mayor Goddard then addressed the Council and expressed his thanks and appreciation for a job well done by Chairman Koory and noted the issues that MAG would be encountering in the upcoming year including air quality, transportation and others. Mayor Goddard also mentioned his concerns with the effectiveness of local government in the state legislative process and indicated that a better job could be done in this area.

With there being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.

Chairman

US-60 Interstate 17 Loop 101 Grand Black Canyon Pima

Loop 303 SR-51 Estrella Piestewa

Loop 101 Loop 202 Agua Fria Red Mountain

Interstate 10 US-60 Papago Superstition

SR-30 SR-24 Tres Rios Gateway

Loop 202 SR-143 Interstate 10 Loop 101 Loop 202 South Mountain Hohokam Maricopa Price Santan Location of SR-30 Corridor is approximate and under study. MAG Regional Freeway and Highway Program Network 10/5/2017 © 2017, All Rights Reserved. FREEWAY NAMES Route Name Limits Cities Interstate 10 Papago Freeway SR-85 to Interstate 17 Split Interchange Buckeye, Goodyear, Avondale, Phoenix Maricopa Freeway Interstate 17 Split Interchange to SR-202L/Santan Phoenix, Tempe, Guadalupe, Chandler and South Mountain Freeways

Interstate 17 Black Canyon Freeway Interstate 10 Split Interchange to Yavapai County Phoenix, Maricopa County

SR-24 Gateway Freeway SR-202L/Santan Freeway to Meridian Rd (Pinal Mesa, Queen Creek Countyline)

SR-30 (Proposed) Proposed Tres Rios (planned SR-85 to Interstate 17/Black Canyon Buckeye, Goodyear, Avondale, Phoenix as the I-10 Reliever Freeway)

SR-51 Piestewa Freeway Interstate 10/SR-202L 'Mini-Stack' Interchange to Phoenix SR-101L/Pima Freeway

US-60 Superstition Freeway Interstate 10/Maricopa Freeway to Meridian Rd Tempe, Mesa (Pinal Countyline)

SR-143 Hohokam Expressway Interstate 10/Maricopa Freeway to SR-202L/Red Phoenix, Tempe Mountain Freeway

SR-101L Agua Fria Freeway Interstate 10/Papago Freeway to Interstate Tolleson, Phoenix, Glendale, Peoria Loop 101 17/Black Canyon Freeway Pima Freeway Interstate 17/Black Canyon Freeway to SR- Phoenix, Scottsdale, Salt River Pima Maricopa 202L/Red Mountain Freeway Indian Community, Tempe, Mesa Price Freeway SR-202L/Red Mountain Freeway to SR- Tempe, Mesa, Chandler 202L/Santan Freeway

SR-202L Red Mountain Freeway Interstate 10/SR-51 'Mini-Stack' Interchange to Phoenix, Tempe, Mesa Loop 202 US-60/Superstition Freeway Santan Freeway US-60/Superstition Freeway to Interstate Mesa, Gilbert, Chandler 10/Maricopa Freeway South Mountain Freeway Interstate 10/Maricopa Freeway to Interstate Chandler, Phoenix 10/Papago Freeway

SR-303L Estrella Freeway MC-85/Buckeye Rd to Interstate 17/Black Canyon Goodyear, Glendale, Surprise, Peoria, Phoenix Loop 303 Bob Stump Parkway Freeway

COMMON NAMES FOR MAJOR SYSTEM TRAFFIC INTERCHANGES* Name Junction Location The Stack Junction of Interstate 10/Papago Freeway and Interstate 17/Black Canyon Phoenix (Northwest of Downtown near Arizona Freeway State Fairgrounds)

The Split or Junction of Interstate 10/Papago and Maricopa Freeways and Interstate 17/Black Phoenix (Southwest of Downtown near Sky Maricopa TI Canyon Freeway Harbor International Airport)

The MiniStack Junction of Interstate 10/Papago Freeway, SR-51, Piestewa Freeway, and SR- Phoenix (Northwest of Downtown near Sky 202L/Red Mountain Freeway Harbor and Maricopa Medical Center)

Pecos Stack Junction of Interstate 10/Maricopa Freeway and SR-202L/Santan Freeway and Phoenix, Chandler (near Wild Horse Pass and the South Mountain Freeway Gila River Indian Community)

Super-Red-Tan Junction of US-60/Superstition Freeway and SR-202L/Red Mountain Freeway Mesa (near Apache Junction) and Santan Freeway

North Stack Junction of Interstate 17/Black Canyon Freeway and SR-101L/Agua Fria Freeway Phoenix (near Deer Valley Airport) and Pima Freeway

Red Mountain Stack Junction of SR-101L/Pima Freeway and Price Freeway and SR-202L/Red Tempe, Mesa (near Tempe Marketplace and ASU) Mountain Freeway *Not officially designated; considered "common" names from media reports. as of 10/4/2017. Agenda Item #8

Regional Plan to End Homelessness e

MARICOPA REGIONAL CONTINUUM OF CARE

2017

Continuum of Care Board Co-Chairs Kevin Hartke, Vice-Mayor, City of Chandler Amy Schwabenlender, Vice President Community Impact, Valley of the Sun United Way

Plan adopted by the Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care Board August 28, 2017

Page 1

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 3

Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care 4

Summary of Homelessness in Maricopa County 6

Plan Overview 10

Intended Goals and Milestones Reached

Singles Homelessness 11

Chronic Homelessness 14

Veteran Homelessness 17

Family Homelessness 20

Youth Homelessness 23

System for Ending All Homelessness 26

Community Input Sessions 30

Local Initiatives 33

Special Thank You 34

Page 2

Executive Summary

The Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care (CoC) following Plan to End Homelessness is our roadmap represents the Phoenix metropolitan area. The CoC towards a day when the community has ample is committed to collaboration and coordination on a resources and a seamless homeless services delivery regional basis because we know that homelessness system for every individual and family experiencing does not stop at any one city’s borders. Working homelessness. together towards common goals, we will care for our neighbors and ensure that the county’s residents To continue on the path towards ending have access to safe, affordable, and stable housing. homelessness in the region, our priorities are:

The previous plan developed by the CoC was • Targeting homeless services through a robust successful by focusing on three key goals: and easily accessible coordinated entry system; • Raising awareness and support for • Delivering homeless services that decrease coordinated responses to end homelessness; barriers to housing and determine eligibility • Leveraging funding, services, and housing by based on vulnerability and service needs; creating new innovative partnerships and • Strengthening partnerships to create strengthening collaborative relationships; additional housing and freeing housing and dollars by leveraging housing resources with • Increasing permanent supportive housing Medicaid-billable services; and units and rapid re-housing units for • Showing improved system performance individuals and families experiencing year-to-year, to track progress towards homelessness. overall goal of ensuring that homelessness in the region is rare, brief and non-recurring. While we are proud of our accomplishments thus far, we know that there is still significant work to be This new plan reaffirms and builds upon the done. We are committed to forging a path for the goals made in the previous plan by working to most vulnerable among us and know the real risks expand housing resources to meet the needs of faced by our friends living on the streets. We mourn those experiencing homelessness in our those lost to us in the harsh desert climate of our area community. The goal is to create a long-term and are mindful that one-third of all heat-related sustainable system that ensures that deaths in the region are people experiencing homelessness in our community is brief, rare, homelessness. For our community, ending and non-recurring. homelessness is truly a life or death proposition. The

Page 3

Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care

Who is involved in the regional effort to end homelessness?

At the center of this effort to end homelessness in To connect those living on the street with health the region is the Maricopa Regional Continuum of and housing services, providers such as police, fire, Care, coordinated by the Maricopa Association of and other first responders partner with street Governments (MAG). outreach. The criminal justice system also works hand-in-hand with behavioral health and homeless We are fortunate to have the best and the brightest service providers through implementation of in our community committed to innovative programs for the justice- ending homelessness. Through involved population experiencing MAG’s stakeholder community, homelessness. including the region’s mayors, city council members, the County Board In addition to the healthcare and of Supervisors, and other elected justice systems, state child welfare officials, the issue of ending representatives connect youth homelessness in our region has been aging out of the foster care system highly prioritized. Funding partners with resources and oversee the meet regularly to align resources in needs of children and youth in the order to meet regional needs, both homeless services system. School with private and public housing liaisons work with school-aged resources. children to ensure that education is not interrupted by episodes of In addition, major healthcare homelessness. providers have led efforts to address medically vulnerable persons. The area’s Regional Behavioral The Continuum of Care stands at the center of Health Authority commits to and leads community regional efforts and is led by a diverse and expert behavioral health initiatives. governing board, assisted by five key groups, and is reflective of the systems described above.

Page 4

What is the Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care?

The governing board and the five primary groups are The Data Subcommittee provides a forum to review represented by stakeholders in the community that data, provide input and make recommendations to the include: formerly homeless individuals, single providers, Continuum of Care Board on policies related to the family providers, youth providers, veterans and veteran Homeless Management Information System data advocates, outreach teams, domestic violence advocates, collection and use. Using data to inform decisions and the criminal justice system, the healthcare system, the planning, the Data Subcommittee contributes expertise to behavioral health system, the child welfare system, elected effectively use community data. It consists of providers, officials, the police department, the fire department, funders, the singles and families coordinated entry leads, Emergency Solutions Grant recipients, Public Housing and the HMIS lead. Authorities, and private funders. The roles of the primary CoC stakeholders are described below. The Coordinated Entry Subcommittee serves to problem-solve issues facing the coordinated entry system The CoC Board is the policy-setting and decision- and provides policy recommendations to the Continuum making body for the Maricopa Regional Continuum of of Care Board on principles and guidelines for the system. Care. The Board develops, annually updates, and follows the governance charter in consultation with CoC (MAG) The ESG Subcommittee consults with the CoC Board staff and the Homeless Management Information System to foster collaboration and coordination of ESG and lead (CIR). The Board works to strengthen the homeless CoC-funded services and performance outcomes. services system by providing guidance and support to nonprofit homeless services providers and taking The Rank and Review Subcommittee ensures the appropriate action on the performance of those providers. objective review of performance metrics, and seeks to maximize HUD CoC funding through rating and The five key groups recommend policies to the CoC reviewing projects recommended for funding. They also Board in the following ways: analyze the CoC’s portfolio of interventions to restructure resources in order to meet regional homeless needs, and The CoC Committee is a collaborative of cross-sector provide those recommendations to the Board. stakeholders providing housing and services to people experiencing homelessness in Maricopa County. The purpose of the Committee is to provide input and recommendations to the Continuum of Care Board and MAG staff, and support communication across working groups.

Page 5

Summary of Homelessness in Maricopa County

Why is it Important to End Homelessness? The health of our communities may be measured gained more than 81,000 people, an increase of in the economic well-being of its residents. The more than 200 people per day. The burgeoning cost of homelessness includes costs incurred by population brings challenges associated with law enforcement, the healthcare system, city absorbing the highest number of new residents in services like zoning and code enforcement, and the the country. Challenges include rising housing toll it takes on neighborhoods and area businesses costs and a tight private rental market run by where people experiencing homelessness may landlords reluctant to rent to vulnerable congregate in parks and on the streets. Some populations who tend to “fall through the cracks”. communities bear a disproportionate burden, such as when services are centralized or encampments Despite these challenges, we have achieved a flat crop up. The greatest concentration of people trend and have not faced the influx of individuals experiencing homelessness is in the City of and families experiencing homelessness that other Phoenix. However, trends show the unsheltered temperate communities have undergone. Since population increasing in all communities in 2013, the annual Point-in-Time count shows Maricopa County. Moreover, increases in the homelessness in the region averaging 5,700 every County’s general population has had an impact on year and 2017 showing a slight reduction (5,605) housing availability and costs that exacerbates the from previous years. However, the PIT count is issue. only a one-night snapshot of homelessness in the region, and should be supplemented with other According to the U.S. Census Bureau, between data sources to provide a better understanding of July 1, 2015 and July 1, 2016, Maricopa County the homelessness problem in the county.

Point-in-Time Total Person Count. 2013-2017

Page 6

The number of unsheltered individuals and families increased substantially from 2016 to 2017, by approximately 25%. This can be demonstrated by a 2017 map depicting the scatter of homelessness in the region. As expected, the largest density is in the city of Phoenix in 2017, with significant scatter in all directions. These data are comparable to those in previous years, including 2015 and 2016, but with more scatterin 2017. Efforts must continue to target the increasing unsheltered population identified in the 2017 Point-in-Time count.

Through focused work on Veteran homelessness, However, there is still a long way to go to provide the community now has resources to end enough affordable units in Maricopa County; there homelessness for Veteran families within 30 days, is a deficit of 116,080 units for households at or achieving functional zero. To build upon these below extremely low income (ELI) thresholds. successes with the veteran population, the For every 100 households at or below ELI community has added resources to pave the way thresholds, there are 21 affordable and available toward similar success for other target units. For households at or below 50% of the area populations. A tremendous increase in CoC- median income (AMI), there is a deficit of 119,237 funded and community-funded permanent units. There are only 48 affordable and available housing units has resulted in additional Permanent units per 100 households at or below 50% of AMI, Supportive Housing (PSH) units and Rapid Re- according to the National Low Income Housing Housing (RRH) units in 2017. Coalition’s March 2017 report.

Housing Inventory Chart Total Unit Count, 2016 and 2017

Page 7

What is the Impact of the Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care?

•Provided long-term housing and services. Significantly, 93% of formerly homeless residents in Permanent Supportive Housing retain their housing every year. (HMIS APR 5/8/2017.) •Provided regional services to ensure that veteran families experiencing homelessness are immediately connected with housing and related services, according to the Family Housing Hub. •Implemented a monitoring protocol to assess how closely nonprofit providers adhere to a low-barrier or Housing First model so that the most vulnerable individuals and families have immediate access to housing without preconditions. • Achieved success in diversion strategies. In 2016, coordinated entry successfully diverted 1,686 families from entering the homeless services system and 78% of those did not return to coordinated entry. For individuals, coordinated entry diverted 484 individuals from the homeless services system (Family Housing Hub and Singles 2016 Coordinated Entry Year End Report).

Page 8

What are Some Programs of Focus?

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families The Justice System and Homelessness (TANF) Each year, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office According to the Morrison Institute for Public counts 95,000 to 100,000 bookings, primarily non- Policy, in the fiscal year 2015-2016, there were violent offenses (Homelessness and Criminal significant reductions in assistance to low- Justice Involvement: Hand in Hand Study, Justice income families with children. Arizona became System Planning & Information, Maricopa County, the first and only state to limit lifetime June 2017). While 40% are released after initial appearance (24 hours) and 50% and released eligibility requirements for recipients of with 72 hours, evidence suggests Temporary Assistance for Needy that 72+ hours in custody results Families (TANF) to 12 months, in escalating recidivism for low- compared to federal law limits of risk populations. Unfortunately, 60 months (TANF cuts: Is 23% of the jail population Arizona Shortsighted in reported being homeless at least its Dwindling Support for Poor once within the year. This rate Families?, Thom Reilly & Keiran increased substantially for the Vitek, Morrison Institute for severely mentally-ill population, Public Policy, Arizona State where 50% report homelessness University, June 2015). As such, at least once within the year. many Arizona families will no longer receive TANF benefits Astonishingly, from 2014 to under Arizona law, even while 2015, 59 unique individuals were qualifying under federal laws. responsible for 1,026 bookings, The number of families and were designated as the qualifying for TANF benefits has chronic offenders. For 75% of declined sharply in the last these chronic offenders, several decade: in 1994-95, Arizona provided misdemeanor charges made up 76-100% of all 55 out of 100 families in poverty with TANF charges. Furthermore, of these chronic benefits. In 2013, only nine out of 100 offenders, 93% reported being homeless. In impoverished families with children received addition, 24% were diagnosed as being seriously TANF basic assistance. Furthermore, in 2005, mentally ill, all of whom were identified as there were a total of 45,000 TANF cases in homeless. Arizona. In 2014, approximately 29,000 families received TANF benefits in Arizona.

Page 9

Plan Overview

Ultimate Goal Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care will create a system for providing services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness that ensures that homelessness is rare, brief and non-recurring.

Long-Term Goals Integrate resources and achieve widespread coordination of services across the region.

Increase number of units available.

Page 10

Goal: End Singles Homelessness

Includes Chronic, Veterans and unaccompanied youth.

Current Data

On any given night in 2017, in the region there are

3766

Singles-Dedicated Units Compared to Singles PIT Count, 2016 and 2017

Page 11

Milestones One Year: Longer Term:

• Strengthen services for singles experiencing • Identify and secure funding stream(s) to support homelessness. increasing the number of units needed to achieve • Enhance data partnerships to inform plan to end functional zero. • homelessness for singles, including data needed Create a system that integrates jails, hospitals and to determine the need for a progressive other systems of care into the coordinated entry engagement policy. system using data-based solutions. • Address the need for sufficient access points to ensure full geographic coverage of coordinated entry.

Page 12

Action Items Short-Term Priority Short-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Strengthen services for singles experiencing homelessness. CE Lead, 2018 Singles o Formally define and communicate “diversion” strategies and establish baseline outcome data. Providers, CoC o Explore technology solutions for making system more transparent and integrate with HMIS. Committee o Work with Collaborative Applicant on annual evaluation of coordinated entry system. o Connect singles with benefits or workforce connections to increase income to achieve sustainability. 2 • Enhance data partnerships to inform plan to end homelessness for singles, including data needed to determine HMIS Lead, CE 2018 the need for a progressive engagement policy. Lead, Data Subcommittee o Set threshold goals for the system to include exits to Permanent Housing, length of stay, and returns to homelessness. o Use data to align funding needs and existing resources to end homelessness. 3 • Address the need for sufficient access points to ensure full geographic coverage of coordinated entry. CE Lead, CE 2018 Subcommittee Long-Term Priority Long-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Identify and secure funding stream(s) to support increasing the number of units needed to achieve functional CoC Board TBD zero. o Seek new partnerships to bring governmental and non-governmental resources to support units for housing individuals experiencing chronic homelessness.

2 • Create a system that integrates jails, hospitals and other systems of care into the coordinated entry system using Coordinated TBD data-based solutions. Entry Providers and o Fully integrate other systems of care into coordinated entry and determine a process by which individuals may access coordinated entry through a wide-range of access points. CE Subcommittee

Page 13

Goal: End Chronic Homelessness

Current Data

On any given night in 2017, in the region there are

898

Current

Chronic-Dedicated Units Compared to Chronic PIT Count, 2016 and 2017

Page 14

Milestones

One Year: Longer Term: • Set the policies and procedures for the ten • Identify and secure funding stream(s) to support benchmarks on the Community Solutions increasing the number of units needed to achieve scorecard. functional zero. • Determine the inflow and outflow of chronic • Connect chronic homeless in jails, frequent users homelessness to calculate the need for units of hospitals and other systems of care into the dedicated to chronic homeless persons. coordinated entry system. • Develop, through a gaps analysis, a value for the number of units required to reach functional zero. • Identify chronic homeless in jails, frequent users of hospitals and other systems of care.

Page 15

Action Items Short-Term Priority Short-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Set the policies and procedures for the ten benchmarks on the Community Solutions scorecard. Ending Chronic 2018 Homeless o Establish a mechanism within HMIS to identify people aging into chronicity. Workgroup o Established a written policy that specifies the number of days of inactivity at which a person’s status will be changed to ‘inactive,’ and implement a protocol to locate the individual before they are moved to an inactive status. 2 • Determine the inflow and outflow of chronic homelessness to calculate the need for units dedicated to Ending Chronic 2018 chronic homeless persons. Homeless Workgroup o Continue to dedicate additional turnover units to chronically homeless persons and families. o Determine the number and percentage by which chronic numbers will decrease in the next year. o Set goals on the number and percentage by which the chronically homeless population is housed in the next year and work through those goals with data-driven solutions. o Identify chronic homeless in jails, frequent users of hospitals and other systems of care. 3 • Develop, through a gaps analysis, a value for the number of units required to reach functional zero. Ending Veteran 2018 Homeless o Develop a course of action through data-driven processes to reach functional zero specifically for the subpopulation of chronically homeless veterans. Workgroup Long-Term Priority Long-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Identify and secure funding stream(s) to support increasing the number of units needed to achieve functional CoC Board TBD zero. o Seek new partnerships to bring governmental and non-governmental resources to support units for housing individuals and families experiencing chronic homelessness.

2 • Create a system that integrates jails, hospitals and other systems of care into the coordinated entry system using Coordinated TBD data-based solutions. Entry Providers and o Fully integrate other systems of care into coordinated entry and determine a process by which individuals and families may access coordinated entry through a wide-range of access points. CE Subcommittee

Page 16

Goal: End Veteran Homelessness

Current Data

On any given night in 2017, in the region there are

486

Veteran-Dedicated Units Compared to Veteran PIT Count, 2016 and 2017

Page 17

Milestones

One Year: Longer Term: • Effectively manage significant changes to the • Reach functional zero for veterans experiencing Grant Per Diem program to appropriately target homelessness using HUD prioritization strategies interventions to the veteran population. that populate the by-name list. • Reduce the number of chronic veterans on the • Engage other systems of care, including medical community by-name list by 95% and overall and behavioral health systems, using HMIS. number of veterans on the by-name list by 15%.

• Maintain a sustainable quality by-name list.

Page 18

Action Items Short-Term Priority Short-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Effectively manage significant changes to the Grant Per Diem program to appropriately target interventions to the veteran Ending 2018 population. Veteran Homelessness o Involve GPD providers in the Ending Veteran Homelessness Workgroup to ensure continuous feedback on status of GPD changes. Workgroup (with VA) o Ensure integration of GPD units with coordinated entry system including VI-SPDAT assessment for every veteran in a GPD bed. 2 • Reduce the number of chronic veterans on the community by-name list by 95% and overall number of veterans on the by-name EVHW (with 2018 list by 15%. VA) o Accelerate housing placements to reduce veterans on the list identified as experiencing chronic homelessness by 95% which will correspond to a 15% reduction in the number of veterans on the by-name list. 3 • Maintain a sustainable quality by-name list. EVHW (with 2018 VA and CE o Work with the VA to enter veteran data into the Homeless Management Information System for coordinated entry which will include eligibility status and housing placements. Leads) o Create policies to identify, assess, and house all veterans experiencing homelessness within 90 days. Long-Term Priority Long-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Reach functional zero for veterans experiencing homelessness using HUD prioritization strategies that populate the by-name EVHW (with TBD list. VA) o Prioritize veterans experiencing chronic homelessness so that every veteran experiencing chronic homelessness is housed within 90 days. o Develop additional resources to ensure adequate housing options for all veterans experiencing homelessness. 2 • Engage other systems of care, including medical and behavioral health systems, using HMIS. Ending TBD Veteran o Develop policies and procedures to link the data and information from other systems of care to the information inputted into HMIS systems. Homelessness Workgroup (with VA)

Page 19

Goal: End Family Homelessness

Current Data

On any given night in 2017, in the region there are

495

Family-Dedicated Units Compared to Family PIT Count, 2016 and 2017

Page 20

Milestones

One Year: Longer Term: • Strengthen diversion services for families • Align resources with acuity assessment scores and experiencing homelessness. need determined by gaps analysis. • Enhance data partnerships to inform plan to • Connect with sustainable community supports to end homelessness for families, including data transition successful exits to Permanent Housing. • needed to determine the need for a Develop effective move on strategies for families progressive engagement policy. in PSH. • Address the need for sufficient access points to ensure full geographic coverage of coordinated entry.

2016 Family Housing Hub Dashboard

Page 21

Action Items Short-Term Priority Short-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Strengthen services for families experiencing homelessness. CE Lead, Family Providers, 2018 CoC Committee o Formally define and communicate “diversion” strategies and establish baseline outcome data. o Explore technology solutions for making system more transparent and integrate with HMIS. o Work with Collaborative Applicant on annual evaluation of coordinated entry system. o Connect families with benefits or workforce connections to increase income to achieve sustainability. 2 • Enhance data partnerships to inform plan to end homelessness for families, including data needed to HMIS Lead, CE Lead, Data 2018 determine the need for a progressive engagement policy. Subcommittee o Set threshold goals for the system to include exits to Permanent Housing, length of stay, and returns to homelessness. o Use data to align funding needs and existing resources to end family homelessness. 3 • Address the need for sufficient access points to ensure full geographic coverage of coordinated entry. CE Lead, CE Subcommittee 2018 Long-Term Priority Long-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Align resources with acuity assessment scores and need determined by gaps analysis. HMIS Lead, CE Lead, Data TBD Subcommittee, CE Subcommittee 2 • Connect with sustainable community supports to transition successful exits to Permanent Housing. Family providers, CoC TBD Committee o Work to remove barriers to affordable housing programs. o Retain/enhance support services needed to exit families to Permanent Housing. o Implement long-term, extensive services for Rapid Re-housing to prevent recidivism. 3 • Develop effective move on strategies for families in PSH. Family providers, CoC TBD Committee

Page 22

Goal: End Youth Homelessness

Current Data

On any given night in 2017, in region there are

325

Youth-Dedicated Units Compared to Youth PIT Count, 2016 and 2017

Page 23

Milestones

One Year: Longer Term: • Identify and define unique needs of youth, and • Maximize use of the existing resources to improve improve service delivery to youth populations. service delivery to youth. • Develop a dashboard for tracking youth • Identify and secure new funding sources for experiencing homelessness. youth housing. • Identify an appropriate coordinated entry • Expand Youth Collaborative to region-wide integration strategy for youth. stakeholders.

Page 24

Action Items Short-Term Priority Short-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Identify and define unique needs of youth, and improve service delivery to youth populations. MAG, HMIS Lead, CoC 2018 Committee and Youth o Support development of mapping youth hotspots using Point-in-Time homeless count data. Collaborative o Identify trends and needs based on HMIS and PIT data. o Encourage innovative strategies for addressing the needs of youth experiencing homelessness. 2 • Develop a dashboard for tracking youth experiencing homelessness. Data Subcommittee, CoC 2018 Committee and Youth Collaborative 3 • Identify an appropriate coordinated entry integration strategy for youth. CE Lead, CE Subcommittee 2018 o Identify how youth are impacted by the coordinated entry prioritization strategy. o Incorporate youth-specific assessments at access points. o Develop protocols for warm hand-off to youth services. Long-Term Priority Long-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Maximize use of the existing resources to improve service delivery to youth. CoC Committee, Youth TBD Collaborative o Develop connection with schools, juvenile justice, and foster care and identify ways to share data and coordinate services. o Connect with sustainable community supports to transition successful exits to Permanent Housing. 2 • Identify and secure new funding sources for youth housing. CoC Board TBD 3 • Expand Youth Collaborative to region-wide stakeholders. CoC Board, Collaborative TBD Applicant o Engage new partners in geographic areas where youth congregate.

Page 25

Goal: Strengthen the System for Ending All Homelessness

Data indicate that there are not yet enough resources to end homelessness in Maricopa County. For example, units for singles are not prevalent enough to address the issue of homelessness among this population of 3,766 singles identified in the Point-in-Time Count in Maricopa County. Specifically, both chronic and veteran populations – which heavily consist of singles – have increased substantially from 2016 to 2017. In addition, families and youth also face homelessness without sufficient resources, although percentages of homeless families and youth have decreased from 2016 to 2017.

Before reaching conclusions on actions to take regarding homelessness in Maricopa County, it is important to first acknowledge that the data from the Homeless Services system represent only a portion of homelessness in the county. There are many other county systems that encounter homeless individuals and families who actually do not make contact with the Homeless Services system, and are never included in the Homeless Management Information System. Some examples of these other county systems include: • The criminal justice and jail system: 59 unique individuals were responsible for 1,026 of the 95-100,000 bookings in CY2014-2015. Of these 59 individuals, 93% reported being homeless, but 33% did not have any entries in the Homeless Management Information System. This means that none of these individuals have been prioritized for or offered any housing. • The healthcare system (AHCCCS, hospitals, etc.):

• The behavioral health system:

• Fire and police:

As such, the goal must not simply to be to reduce the numbers of homeless individuals and families outlined throughout this plan to end homelessness, but also should be to integrate the other systems that frequently interact with homelessness. This represents a very pressing data need: a comparison of hospital, healthcare, and criminal justice coding compared to HMIS records to determine how many homeless individuals and families are not reaching the system. Only after achieving this goal will Maricopa County have a more accurate and representative idea on the true needs of the system, and be able to work to help those in our society who are most vulnerable.

Partnerships with ESG recipients and other funding sources are key to our efforts to end homelessness. Partnership includes aligning outcomes, serving on application review panels, and coordinating the adoption of funding priorities by the CoC Board.

Page 26

Milestones

One Year: Longer Term: • Leverage CoC resources by seeking new • Develop and implement a strategy for right-sizing partnerships with funders, affordable housing interventions. developers, landlords, faith community, • Integrate other systems of care into the healthcare providers, and other partners. coordinated entry system. • Continue to build a fully functional coordinated • Create additional permanent housing in the entry system. region. • Partner with the funding community to ensure • Identify prevention funds. common outcomes and consistent program delivery. • Conduct a systems analysis to identify strengths and areas of improvements and make recommendations for right-sizing interventions.

System Performance Measures System Performance 2015 2016 Change from 2015 to 2016 Measures Length of Time Homeless 99 days 101 days +2.0% (change in days) Returns to Homelessness 18% (650 persons) 24% (1,243 +6.0% (change in percent), (Percentage in 2 years) persons) +91.2% (change in persons) Number of Homeless 15,167 persons 15,112 persons -0.36% (change in persons) Persons (in HMIS) Employment and Income 47% (1,078 persons) 23% (509 persons) -24.0% (change in percent), Growth (Percentage of -52.8% (change in persons) Adults Increasing Total Income) Number of Persons who 9,498 persons 9,688 persons +2.0% (change in persons) Become Homeless for the First Time Successful Placement from 18% (312 persons) 34% (302 persons) +16.0% (change in SO (Percentage Successful percent), -3.2% (change in Exits/Retention) persons)

Page 27

Action Items Short-Term Priority Short-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Leverage CoC resources by seeking new partnerships with funders, affordable housing CoC Board, CoC 2018 developers, landlords, faith community, healthcare providers, and other partners. Committee, o Provide opportunities for new partners to engage in CoC meetings, CoC membership, Collaborative Applicant and education and training events. o Attend national and local housing gatherings to seek new partners. 2 • Continue to build a fully functional coordinated entry system. CoC Board, CE Leads, 2018 o Refine coordinated entry prioritization strategy to serve those most vulnerable. CE Subcommittee o Ensure coordination between coordinated entry leads. o Guard against silos within the coordinated entry system. o Review assessment tools and protocols to incorporate information that comprehensively determines need. o Develop metrics for monitoring this system 3 • Partner with the funding community to ensure common outcomes and consistent program ESG Subcommittee, 2018 delivery. Collaborative Applicant o Invite ESG recipient agencies to participate in the CoC Rank and Review process and reciprocate by serving in ESG funding process to collaborate on common goals. o Align with non-CoC funding sources and groups. 4 • Conduct a systems analysis to identify strengths and areas of improvements and make CoC Board, 2018 recommendations for right-sizing interventions. Collaborative Applicant o Implement and report quarterly on system performance measures. o Facilitate RFP Process to secure a consultant to conduct systems analysis.

Page 28

Long-Term Priority Long-Term Strategy Lead Completion Date Goal 1 • Develop and implement a strategy for right-sizing interventions. CoC Board, Collaborative TBD Applicant o Maximize the use of all current resources and invest where there is the greatest demand. o Align resources determined by system analysis. 2 • Integrate other systems of care into the coordinated entry system. Coordinated Entry TBD Subcommittee, CE Lead, o Seek partnerships and engage with jails and corrections, mental health, hospitals, and other systems that serve those experiencing homelessness. Collaborative Applicant

3 • Create additional permanent housing in the region. All TBD 4 • Identify prevention funds. CoC Board, ESG TBD Subcommittee o Coordinate with DES, CAP offices and other sources to secure and prioritize prevention funds for all populations.

Page 29

Community Input Sessions

What are the Community Input Sessions?

Collaboration and communication are the cornerstones of an effective system to end homelessness in Maricopa County. As such, MAG and the Continuum of Care sought input from members of the community regarding homelessness and its impact on the region. We were fortunate to have attendance by a diverse group of individuals and groups representing communities encompassed by the Continuum, including but not limited to: businesses, elected officials, neighborhoods, faith-based representatives, housing providers, service providers, and participants in the Continuum of Care. The input provided by these groups was essential to developing a Plan to End Homelessness that encompassed all aspects of homelessness.

What was the Process of Establishing These Sessions?

The Community Input Sessions were held on Thursday, August 3rd and Friday, August 4th from 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM. In order to garner input from many members of the region, Save the Date notices were sent through the members of the Continuum of Care, the Maricopa Association of Governments distribution list, the Weekly Update email distribution, as well as other individuals and groups that expressed interest.

The sessions were planned in a “World Café” format such that there was a group information session at the beginning of the event with instructions. Then, the attendees of the session were broken into four sub-sessions, corresponding to each of the major subsections of this Plan to End Homelessness: the system to end homelessness, ending singles (including chronic and veteran) homelessness, ending family homelessness, and ending youth homelessness.

Each group of attendees cycled through the four sub-sessions for fifteen minutes each, providing input specific to each topic. The Table Hosts from each session sought information by determining the strengths of the respective systems, what pieces are missing from these systems, and other individuals or groups who should be at the table to expand discussions. If any person or group had additional information to add after the conclusion of the sub- sessions, reflection cards were passed out seeking this additional information.

After each group of attendees cycled through the four sub-sessions, the entire group returned for a final input session. The host of the community input session asked questions regarding aspects of the sub-sessions that were meaningful, what pieces were missing, and other individuals and groups who should be at the table to continue these discussions. If any person or group had additional information to add after the conclusion of this session, reflection cards were again offered seeking this additional information.

Page 30

What were the Common Themes from These Sessions?

1. Coordinated Entry a. Expand coordinated entry to encompass non-HUD funded providers b. Enhance coordinated entry collaboration between singles and youth systems c. Entry points should consider opportunities to: i. Provide 24/7 accessibility ii. Increase geographical coverage (East and West Valleys) iii. Include mobile entry points iv. Provide transportation options to reach these entry points v. Expand to include phone coverage for people who cannot physically be at the access points vi. Include CAP offices as access points or for services d. Invest in outreach, marketing, and communication to educate homeless or potentially homeless persons about their options

2. Data-driven solutions a. Better utilize HMIS data to determine what the needs and resources are b. Reference other (non-HMIS) data systems and analyses when considering special population needs c. Whenever possible, use data to inform prioritization and funding decisions d. Use data to determine resource needs and gaps in outreach, crisis beds, and permanent housing

3. Housing options a. Provide incentives for landlords to maintain affordable housing b. Seek additional resources to build affordable housing, through private and government funding

4. Collaboration a. Enhance provider coordination, especially when transitioning clients between interventions b. Align non-CoC funding sources with the Continuum of Care c. Increase partnerships and data-sharing with other systems of care, such as: i. Jails and justice ii. Police, fire, and EMS iii. Healthcare (physical and behavioral health) iv. Foster care v. Schools d. Foster relationships with other individuals and groups, such as: i. Homeless and formerly homeless persons ii. Business community iii. Affordable housing developers and landlords iv. Neighborhoods v. Faith-based communities vi. School liaisons vii. Workforce development viii. CAP offices ix. Elected officials e. Seek opportunities to better engage and connect with unsheltered populations, including direct housing placements

Page 31

5. Education and Awareness a. Provide community education efforts to remove general stereotypes and stigmas regarding homelessness b. Proactively seek community and municipal input on efforts to end homelessness (make special effort to include areas outside of Downtown Phoenix) c. Increase awareness of resources in the community available to end homelessness d. Involve neighborhood groups and seek input from clients whenever possible in the decision-making process e. Increase peer-outreach services, involving persons who have formerly experienced homelessness to help those who are homeless or are at risk of becoming homeless f. Train professionals in other systems of care to engage with the homeless population in a culturally competent way g. Advocate for funding and resources to meet system needs

6. Services a. Ensure service options include: i. Substance abuse ii. Mental health iii. Financial literacy iv. Employment assistance v. Workforce development vi. Education vii. Family planning b. Include CAP as access points or for services

7. Prevention a. Seek resources and investment in prevention efforts

Page 32

Local Initiatives

Maricopa County StandDown

Annually, the StandDown event for veterans experiencing or at risk of homelessness takes place in the Phoenix metropolitan area, providing services such as: direct connection to housing and services, legal services, driver’s licenses, Social Security, and Veterans benefits, amongst others.

Health/Housing of Medically Vulnerable People (HOMeVP)

Monthly, the Health/Housing of Medically Vulnerable People (HOMeVP) coalition works to address the relationship between medically vulnerable people and homelessness in Maricopa County with a model that strives to (1) enable access to housing and (2) address the medical, social, and psychological needs of homeless populations.

Frequent User System Engagement (F.U.S.E.)

The Frequent User System Engagement (F.U.S.E.) program is a public / private partnership between the City of Phoenix, Circle the City, and Corporation for Supportive Housing, designed to provide medical treatment and stabilization to 20 homeless individuals who are frequent users of Fire, Police, and Emergency Room services.

Misdemeanor Repeat Offender Program (MROP)

The MROP program seeks to partner policy and city prosecutors, as well as the social services departments of various locations in Phoenix to correct root causes of crimes in the city by working together to help homeless persons affected by mental illness, poverty, or drug dependency restore quality of life.

Page 33

Special Thank You

Broad community input was integral to this 2017 Plan to End Homelessness and the workings of the Continuum of Care. We would like to thank those who have volunteered to serve on groups central to the operations of the Continuum of Care.

Continuum of Care Board Allie Bones, Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Beverlee Kroll, Department of Child Safety Brad Bridwell, Cantwell-Anderson – Cloudbreak Bruce Liggett, Maricopa County Human Services Dept. Diana Yazzie Devine, Native American Connections, Inc. Darlene Newsom, UMOM Moises ‘Moe’ Gallegos, City of Phoenix Human Services Dept. Dawn Noggle, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services Marisue Garganta, Dignity Health, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center Amy Schwabenlender, Valley of the Sun United Way, Scott Hall, City of Phoenix Board Co-Chair Kevin Hartke, Vice-Mayor City of Chandler, Board Co-Chair

Continuum of Care Committee Kathy Di Nolfi, A New Leaf Barbara A. Sloan, The Salvation Army Alfred Edwards, Arizona Department of Economic Security Stephanie Small, City of Glendale Linda Elliott, one•n•ten Stefanie Smith, Native American Connections Blythe Fitzharris, Mercy Maricopa Integrated Health Ursula Strephans, Central Arizona Shelter Services, Committee Vice Chair Shane Groen, Arizona Housing Coalition , Arizona Behavioral Health Corporation Sheila Harris, Human Services Campus Charles Sullivan , Save the Family, Committee Chair Vicki Helland, Community Bridges Jacki Taylor , Community Information and Referral Michelle Jameson, U.S. VETS – Phoenix Michelle Thomas , Phoenix Shanti Group Nicole Janich, Arizona State University Keith A. Thompson City of Tempe Barbara Lewkowitz, Justa Center Kim Van Nimwegen, , Arizona Housing Inc. Mattie Lord, UMOM New Day Center John Wall , Circle the City Laura Magruder, Maggie’s Place Brandi Whisler , Southwest Behavioral & Health Services Linda Mushkatel, Lodestar Day Resource Center Andrea Williams Sara Sims, Phoenix Elementary School District

Coordinated Entry Subcommittee Riann Balch, City of Phoenix Liz Morales, City of Mesa Andrea Bell, Mercy Maricopa Integrated Care Brian Planty, UMOM (non-voting) Sheila Harris, Human Services Campus (non-voting) TJ Reed, Human Services Campus (non-voting) Amy Jacobson, City of Chandler Michelle Thomas, Community Information and Referral (non-voting) Margaret Kilman, Maricopa County Kim Van Nimwegen, City of Tempe Betsy Long, Department of Economic Security Christine Wetherington, Valley of the Sun United Way Mattie Lord, UMOM (non-voting) Jeff Willgale, Veterans Affairs Rachel Milne, Maricopa County

Page 34

Data Subcommittee Jennifer Dangremond, Native American Connections, Inc. TJ Reed, Human Services Campus Jeremy Huntoon, Community Bridges, Inc. Chela Schuster, UMOM New Day Center Margaret Kilman, Maricopa County Laura Skotnicki, Save the Family Jennifer Page, Arizona Housing Coalition Charles Sullivan, Arizona Behavioral Health Corporation Ty Rosensteel, Community Information and Referral (non-voting)

ESG Subcommittee Renee Ayres-Benavidez & Charyn Eirich-Palmisano, Kristina Blea & Scott Hall, City of Phoenix City of Glendale Margaret Kilman & Rachel Milne, Maricopa County Alfred Edwards & Betsy Long, Arizona Department of Deanna Grogan & Liz Morales, City of Mesa Economic Security Christine Wetherington, Valley of the Sun United Way

Rank and Review Subcommittee Renee Ayres-Benavidez, City of Glendale Terri Leon, Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust Andrea Bell, Mercy Maricopa Integrated Care Betsy Long, Arizona Department of Economic Security Nancy Kiflemariam, City of Phoenix Nathan Smith, Phoenix Rescue Mission Margaret Kilman, Maricopa County

Community Input Sessions (organizations) A New Leaf Maricopa Association of Governments Arizona Housing, Inc. Maricopa County AZ Department of Economic Security Mesa United Way CASS Nationwide City of Apache Junction Native American Connections, Inc. City of Glendale Office of Councilwoman Gallego City of Phoenix (NSD) one*n*ten City of Surprise Partners in Recovery City of Tempe Phoenix City Council Community Bridges, Inc. Phoenix District 3 Community Housing Partnership Phoenix Revitalization Corp. Community Input and Referral The Salvation Army Department of Housing and Urban Development Save the Family Direct Aid for Homeless Southwest Network Downtown Phoenix, Inc. St. Patrick Catholic Community en Hance Park Condos Tempe Community Council HOM Inc. Tempe Police Department Homeless Youth Connection Tumbleweed House of Refuge UMOM Justa Center US Vets La Frontera – Empact Valley of the Sun United Way Maggie’s Place

Page 35