DOCSLIB.ORG

Family Tree Maker 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Family Tree Maker 2005 Descendants of Sir William MURRAY Generation No. 1 1. Sir William1 MURRAY was born Bet. 1720 - 1735 in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, and died Unknown. Children of Sir William MURRAY are: 2 i. Alexander2 MURRAY, born in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland; died Unknown. 3 ii. William MURRAY, born in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland; died Unknown. + 4 iii. Neill MURRAY, born 1752 in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland; died Bet. 1820 - 1830 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania. Generation No. 2 4. Neill2 MURRAY (Sir William1) was born 1752 in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, and died Bet. 1820 - 1830 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania. He married Mary Anna BROWN Bef. 1784 in Brownsville "Ft Redstone", Washington County, Pennsylvania, daughter of William BROWN and Christianah THOMPSON. She was born 1762 in Scotland, and died Bet. 1830 - 1840 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania. Children of Neill MURRAY and Mary BROWN are: + 5 i. William3 MURRAY, born 1784 in Nottingham Twp, Washington County, Pennsylvania; died 09 May 1821 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania. 6 ii. Son MURRAY, born in NottinghamTownship, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died Unknown in Pitt Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. 7 iii. John David MURRAY, born 1787 in Nottingham Twp, Washington County, Pennsylvania; died Jun 1855 in Middlesex Twp., Butler County, Pennsylvania. 8 iv. Daughter MURRAY, born in NottinghamTownship, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died Unknown in NottinghamTownship, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. + 9 v. Mary MURRAY, born 01 Jun 1791 in Pitt Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 20 Sep 1879 in Kittanning, Armstong County, Pennsylvania. 10 vi. Daughter MURRAY, born in Pitt Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died Unknown in Pitt Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. + 11 vii. Robert MURRAY, born 1796 in Pitt Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 20 Sep 1873 in Murrysville, Burrell Twp, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. + 12 viii. Margaret MURRAY, born 1800 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania; died 24 Apr 1828 in Buffalo Twp., Butler County, Pennsylvania. Generation No. 3 5. William3 MURRAY (Neill2, Sir William1) was born 1784 in Nottingham Twp, Washington County, Pennsylvania, and died 09 May 1821 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania. He married Sarah J. MILLER 1806 in Butler County, Pennsylvania. She was born 1789 in Pitt Twp., Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and died 26 Nov 1845 in Butler County, Pennsylvania. Children of William MURRAY and Sarah MILLER are: + 13 i. David4 MURRAY, born 01 Feb 1809 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania; died 04 Feb 1890 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi. + 14 ii. William John MURRAY, born 11 Feb 1811 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania; died 23 Jan 1883 in Excelsior, Hennepin County, Minnesota. + 15 iii. James Patton MURRAY, born 07 Jul 1814 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania; died 03 Mar 1890 in Baxter Springs, Cherokee County, Kansas. 16 iv. Mitchel MURRAY, born 16 Oct 1816 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania; died 27 Feb 1841 in Buffalo Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. 1 9. Mary3 MURRAY (Neill2, Sir William1) was born 01 Jun 1791 in Pitt Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and died 20 Sep 1879 in Kittanning, Armstong County, Pennsylvania. She married James PATTON 07 May 1814. He was born 22 Feb 1792 in Centre Twp., Indiana County, Pennsylvania, and died 28 Aug 1857 in Kittanning, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. Children of Mary MURRAY and James PATTON are: 17 i. William4 PATTON, died Unknown. 18 ii. Mary Ann PATTON, born 17 Apr 1815 in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania; died 31 Jan 1888 in Plumcreek Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. She married Robert MCINTOSH Aft. 1870 in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; born 13 Aug 1805 in Pennsylvania; died 24 Jan 1892 in Plum Creek Twp, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. + 19 iii. Nancy PATTON, born 29 Apr 1817 in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania; died 23 Apr 1898 in Plumcreek Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. + 20 iv. Margaret PATTON, born 08 Mar 1819 in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania; died 18 Mar 1888 in Plateville, Taylor County, Iowa. + 21 v. John M. PATTON, born 05 Nov 1822 in Kittanning Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 26 Jan 1890 in Kittanning, Armstong County, Pa. + 22 vi. James PATTON, born 22 Dec 1825 in Kittanning Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 1905 in Kittanning, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. + 23 vii. Elizabeth Jane PATTON, born 02 Dec 1827 in Kittanning Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 03 Mar 1894 in Plumcreek Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. 24 viii. Isabella Belle PATTON, born 20 Feb 1830 in Kittanning Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 27 Jul 1911 in Elderton, Armstrong Co., Pennsylvania. She married (1) H. K. WELTY; died 09 Oct 1898. She married (2) Robert MCCULLOUGH Aft. 1872 in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; born 01 May 1829 in Elderton, Plum Creek Twp, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 14 Mar 1891 in Elderton Twp, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. + 25 ix. Matilda PATTON, born 10 Jun 1832 in Kittanning Twp., Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 23 Dec 1858 in Clinton Twp., Butler County, Pennsylvania. 11. Robert3 MURRAY (Neill2, Sir William1) was born 1796 in Pitt Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and died 20 Sep 1873 in Murrysville, Burrell Twp, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. He married Jane ANDERSON 16 Jan 1823 in Butler County, Pennsylvania, daughter of Francis ANDERSON and Jane MCGARY/MCGEARY. She was born 25 Aug 1803 in Clinton Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania, and died 1865 in Murrysville, Burrell Twp, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. Children of Robert MURRAY and Jane ANDERSON are: + 26 i. Francis Anderson4 MURRAY, born 21 Oct 1823 in Buffalo Twp, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 21 Jan 1892 in Burning Springs Twp, Wirt County, West Virginia. + 27 ii. Mary Ann MURRAY, born 25 Jun 1825 in Buffalo Twp, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 07 Sep 1898 in Upper Burrell Township, Westmoreland County, Pennsylania. + 28 iii. Cornelious "Neill" MURRAY, born 24 Feb 1827 in Buffalo Twp, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 17 Nov 1899 in Vandalia, Des Moines Twp, Jasper County, Iowa. + 29 iv. Elizabeth Jane MURRAY, born 29 Apr 1829 in Buffalo Twp, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania; died 14 Apr 1895 in Allegheny Twp., Westmoreland, Pennsylvania. + 30 v. John MURRAY, born 01 Oct 1831 in West Deer Twp, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 31 Dec 1919 in Lancaster, Atchison County, Kansas. 31 vi. Sarah MURRAY, born 15 Dec 1833 in West Deer Twp., Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 1909 in Merwin, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. She married Dr William MCWILLIAMS 28 Dec 1875 in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania; born 1821 in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania; died 1915 in Merwin, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. + 32 vii. Margaret May MURRAY, born 05 Jan 1836 in West Deer Twp, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 10 Nov 1904 in Holton, Jackson County, Kansas. 33 viii. Martha MURRAY, born 26 Feb 1838 in West Deer Twp, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 22 Jan 1847 in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. 34 ix. Robert MURRAY, born 08 Jan 1840 in West Deer Twp, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 22 Jun 1864 in Civil War - Outside Petersburg, Virginia (Wilderness, VA). 35 x. William Brown MURRAY, born 21 Feb 1842 in West Deer Twp, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 21 Jan 1847 in Allegheny Twp, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. + 36 xi. Joseph E. MURRAY, born 09 Jan 1844 in West Deer Twp, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; died 06 Sep 1930 in Oakmont, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. 12. Margaret3 MURRAY (Neill2, Sir William1) was born 1800 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, 2 Pennsylvania, and died 24 Apr 1828 in Buffalo Twp., Butler County, Pennsylvania. She married James McNEAL. He died 27 Jan 1829 in Butler County, Pennsylvania. Children of Margaret MURRAY and James McNEAL are: + 37 i. Samuel Barber4 MCNEAL, born Dec 1822 in Middlesex Township, Butler Co., PA at Homestead Farm; died Aug 1871 in Kittanning, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. + 38 ii. Elizabeth McNEAL, born 03 Mar 1825 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania; died 09 May 1864 in West Deer Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Generation No. 4 13. David4 MURRAY (William3, Neill2, Sir William1) was born 01 Feb 1809 in Middlesex Twp, Butler County, Pennsylvania, and died 04 Feb 1890 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi. He married (1) Eliza MCFADDEN 12 Aug 1837 in Wilkinson County, Mississippi. She was born in Wilkinson County, Mississippi, and died 05 Oct 1848 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi. He married (2) Malinda CAVIN 10 Oct 1850 in Wilkinson County, Mississippi. She was born 17 Apr 1829 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi, and died 17 Apr 1898 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi. Child of David MURRAY and Eliza MCFADDEN is: 39 i. Samuel McFadden5 MURRAY, born 15 Jul 1840 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi; died 07 Sep 1872 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi. Children of David MURRAY and Malinda CAVIN are: + 40 i. John David5 MURRAY, born 15 Nov 1851 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi; died 09 Apr 1928 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi. + 41 ii. James Melvin MURRAY, born 13 Apr 1854 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi; died 1934 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi. + 42 iii. Thomas Elie MURRAY, born 15 Jun 1857 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County, Mississippi; died 1907 in Rosetta, Wilkinson County,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timeline: the Extension of the Franchise and Women’S Demands for Political Rights
    TIMELINE: THE EXTENSION OF THE FRANCHISE AND WOMEN’S DEMANDS FOR POLITICAL RIGHTS NOTE: Listed below are important points in the process of the development of representative democracy in the United Kingdom. The Reform Acts/Representation of the People Acts listed often made provisions other than extension of the franchise, such as the redistribution of seats, creation of university seats and so on. Only the main provisions concerning the extension of the franchise are outlined here. It was usually the case that separate legislation had to be enacted for Scotland, and the relevant Acts were not necessarily passed for England and Wales and Scotland in the same year. The system of local government in Scotland also differed from that in England and Wales, and therefore the extension of the municipal franchise to women did not occur simultaneously in England and Wales and Scotland, although the process was a broadly parallel one. TIMELINE 1792 Publication of Mary Wollstonecraft’s The Rights of Women, which asserted women’s equality with men. 1820s/1830s Organisation of Ladies’ Emancipation Societies, demanding end to slavery, and beginning the adoption of political and human rights demands which would influence women to demand rights for themselves. Edinburgh Female Anti- Slavery Association established 1830. 1832 Petition to parliament from Mary Smith, presented by Henry Hunt MP. Smith, from Stanmore in the County of York, objected to the Reform Act on the grounds that she paid taxes and should have a share in the election of a representative. Her petition asked that ‘every unmarried female, possessing the necesssary pecuniary qualification, should be entitled to vote for Members of Parliament.’ Reform Act, England and Wales - limited the vote to male householders, and resulted in a modest extension of the vote, which was dependent on property qualifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Theses Digitisation: This Is a Digitised Version of the Original Print Thesis. Copyright and Moral
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] WOMEN OF THE SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT : THEIR IMPORTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF SCOTTISH EDUCATION BY ROSALIND RUSSELL M.A., Dip.Ed., M.Ed. Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. The University of Glasgow DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW February, 1988 Copyright Rosalind Russell 1988 ProQuest Number: 10997952 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10997952 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • These Dangerous Women: a Talk by Helen Kay at the National Library of Scotland
    theedinburghreporter.co.uk http://www.theedinburghreporter.co.uk/2015/03/these-dangerous-women-a-talk-by-helen-kay-at-the-national-library-of-scotland/ These Dangerous Women: a talk by Helen Kay at the National Library of Scotland Rosemary Kaye Although feminism still has many fights to fight, women in today’s Scotland can at least vote, keep their own nationality on marriage and enter any profession they choose. In 1914, women had few of these rights and the UK was at war with Germany. We have an Edinburgh- born woman, Chrystal Macmillan, and her equally intrepid colleagues to thank for both our personal and our political freedom – yet their stories have been erased from history. Now new research – and a new film – are aiming to give these pioneering women the recognition they deserve. Helen Kay is investigating the role of Scottish women in the peace movement; at the National Library of Scotland recently, Helen gave a fascinating and inspiring talk about the ‘dangerous women’ who campaigned tirelessly for peace and equality. Chrystal Macmillan’s early years were spent at Corstorphine Hill House; her father was a partner in Melrose Tea and she and her eight brothers lived a comfortable middle-class life. In 1888 Chrystal joined St Leonard’s School (then very much a girls-only establishment) in St Chrystal MacMillan Andrew’s; she was well educated and won a scholarship to Oxford, but her parents wished her to return to Edinburgh. Enrolling at Edinburgh University to study Maths and Philosophy, she became a member of the Women’s Representation Committee, graduated with a First (and was also the first woman to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree), took an MA in Philosophy and became active in the women’s suffrage movement all over Scotland, often working with Elsie Inglis and Eunice Murray.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queen Margaret Settlement 1897 - 1914
    The Queen Margaret Settlement 1897 - 1914: Glasgow women pioneers in social work. Thesis presented for the degree of M.Litt. in History at the University of Glasgow by Catherine Mary Kendall September 1993 Department of Scottish History University of Glasgow Copyright © 1993 Catherine Mary Kendall. ProQuest Number: 11007780 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007780 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 A bstract. This study concerns the origins and early years of the Queen Margaret Settlement (here­ after QMS) in Glasgow, from its foundation in 1897 until the outbreak of war in 1914. The QMS merits study because of its pivotal role in several related fields, all of which underwent crucial change in this period. The QMS was part of the wider Settlement movement which arose in the 1880s as part of the contemporary ‘rediscovery of poverty’. In the new thinking about the ‘organic’ nature of society, Settlements were a response to the alienation from each other of the urban social classes. The initial aim of the Settle­ ments was to restore the social balance within poor areas by enabling University students to live in Residences as neighbours to the poor; in time many Settlements developed a strong interest in educating workers to understand the conditions they encountered.
    [Show full text]
  • WHS Suffrage Scotland – Militancy
    THE WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT IN SCOTLAND, 1867- 1928: A LEARNING RESOURCE SUFFRAGE MILITANCY IN SCOTLAND Valerie Wright In this section you will find information on the following: The difference between suffragettes and suffragists An account of how the suffrage movement became divided An overview of the organisations and individuals involved in militancy A summary of the militant acts that took place in Scotland (that we know of) The consequences of militant action for some individuals The term ‘suffragettes’, coined in the early twentieth century, is often used to describe all efforts by individual women and women’s organisations to gain the right to vote in Parliamentary elections on equal terms with men. However there were important distinctions between those organisations which continued to use constitutional methods to affect change, known as suffragists, and those who instead became increasingly militant in using what may be described as ‘direct action’. These were the women who could accurately be described as suffragettes. This section considers the history of suffrage militancy in Scotland and the women involved. It is followed by a case study of the contribution of local research to understandings of how widespread militancy was in Scotland, both geographically and in terms of the individuals involved. Scottish women and suffrage militancy Conventional studies of suffrage militancy always start with the Pankhursts (Emmeline and her daughters Christabel, Sylvia and Adela) and the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU). Formed in 1903 in Manchester this organisation took a new direction, demanding, rather than requesting, ‘votes for women’. It established headquarters in London in 1906.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Women and Political Representation in the UK and Scottish Parliaments (1918–2020)
    ‘An Unconventional MP’: Nancy Astor, public women and gendered political culture How to Cite: Breitenbach, E 2020 Scottish Women and Political Representation in the UK and Scottish Parliaments (1918–2020). Open Library of Humanities, 6(2): 14, pp. 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/ olh.579 Published: 21 September 2020 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the double-blind process of Open Library of Humanities, which is a journal published by the Open Library of Humanities. Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Open Access: Open Library of Humanities is a peer-reviewed open access journal. Digital Preservation: The Open Library of Humanities and all its journals are digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS scholarly archive service. Esther Breitenbach, ‘Scottish Women and Political Representation in the UK and Scottish Parliaments (1918–2020)’ (2020) 6(2): 14 Open Library of Humanities. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.579 ‘AN UNCONVENTIONAL MP’: NANCY ASTOR, PUBLIC WOMEN AND GENDERED POLITICAL CULTURE Scottish Women and Political Representation in the UK and Scottish Parliaments (1918–2020) Esther Breitenbach University of Edinburgh, UK [email protected] This article reviews the record of Scottish women’s representation in the UK Parliament since 1918, and in the Scottish Parliament since 1999. Women candidates have stood for election to Westminster at every General Election since 1918, with the first Scottish woman MP being elected in 1923.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I: Timeline on the Extension of the Franchise
    THE WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT IN SCOTLAND, 1867-1928: A LEARNING RESOURCE APPENDIX I: TIMELINE ON THE EXTENSION OF THE FRANCHISE Listed below are the key stages in the enfranchisement of women at municipal and parliamentary level. The Reform Acts/Representation of the People Acts listed often made provisions other than extension of the franchise, such as the redistribution of seats, creation of university seats and so on. Only the main provisions concerning the extension of the franchise are outlined here. It should be noted that it was usually the case that separate legislation had to be enacted for Scotland, and the relevant Acts were not necessarily passed for England and Wales and Scotland in the same year. The system of local government in Scotland also differed from that in England and Wales, and therefore the extension of the municipal franchise to women did not occur simultaneously in England and Wales and Scotland, although the process was a broadly parallel one. 1867 Reform Act - England and Wales. The borough franchise was extended to all male householders as long as they were not in receipt of poor relief and met registration requirements. Lodgers occupying lodgings worth £10 were also enfranchised. The property qualification for the county franchise was reduced. There was an unsuccessful attempt by John Stuart Mill to amend the 1867 Reform Act to include women under the definition of ‘person’. 1868 Reform Act – Scotland. The burgh vote was extended to householders not in receipt of poor relief, and to lodgers in lodgings valued at least £10. The county franchise qualification threshold was also lowered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Center for Women's Studies Newsletter September 2019
    “Your self-worth is determined by you. You don’t 1 have to depend on someone telling you who you are.” -Beyoncé The Center for Women’s Studies Newsletter September 2019 TO EDUCATE, SUPPORT, AND REACH OUT TO WOMEN ON OUR CAMPUS IN THE CONTEXT OF A GLOBAL COMMUNITY. Table of Contents 2 Women in History……………………………....………………….……….3 “Self-awareness Month” by Tia Sherer.…….…………………….…….. 4 White Ribbon Days….………………….………………………….……….5 “Self Improvement” by Bonnie Smith……………...….……….….………6 Resources at the Women’s Center………..….…...……………..……… 7 Internally Speaking……………………………….…………….….….…...8 Purple Ribbon Days…………......……………………………….……..….9 Coordinator’s Notes……….………………………………………………10 Social Media………..…………………………………………….………. 11 September-October 2019 Calendar Friday, Sept. 6 - Safe Zone Training - GUC Loft - 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM. Friday, Sept. 13 - Peer Body Project - Banquet Halls - 8:45 AM - 5:00 PM. Saturday, Sept. 14 - Peer Body Project - Student Counseling Services - 8:45 AM - 4:30 PM. Tuesday, Sept. 17 - White Ribbon Days - GUC - 10:30 AM - 12:30 PM. Wednesday, Sept. 18 - White Ribbon Days - GUC - 10:30 AM - 12:30 PM. Tuesday & Wednesday, Oct. 1 & 2 - Purple Ribbon Days - GUC - 10:30 AM - 12:30 PM. 3 Women in History Eunice Murray Eunice Guthrie Murray was born on January 21, 1878. Eunice was a Scottish suffrage campaigner and author. She was the only Scottish woman in the first election open to women in 1918. Murray was born in Cardross to American born abolitionist parents David Murray and Frances Porter Stoddard. Her father was a leading lawyer and both were supporters of the women’s movement. Murray was educated at St. Leonard's School, and then undertook voluntary work with the League of Pity.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2005 Issn 1476-6760 Claudia Thompson on Amalia and Annie: a Case Study in Women’S Suffrage
    Women’s History Magazine Issue 50, Summer 2005 Issn 1476-6760 Claudia Thompson on Amalia and Annie: A Case Study in Women’s Suffrage Marjorie Feld on Lillian D. Wald and the ‘Female Dominion’ of American Reform Ellen Jacobs on ‘Travelling “fellows”’: Women Social Scientists in inter-war Britain Vivienne Barker on A Half-forgotten Heroine: Edmone Robert PLUS: Two Book Reviews Conference Notices/Calls for Papers Steering Committee News th 14 Conference of the Women’s History Network Women, Art and Culture: Historical Perspectives September 2nd- 4th 2005, Southampton Southampton Institute, Sir James Matthews Conference Centre, Southampton, Hants. Women and the visual arts; painting, sculpture, architecture, and the decorative arts. Women and the Arts and Crafts Movement/Home Decorating. Women and the performing arts. Women and the literary arts. Women as art objects/images of women. Women as mediators of culture. Women as collectors and benefactors. Plenary Speakers: Frances Borzello on 'Women Artists: Self Portraits' Marina Vaizey on '20th Century Women Collectors' Janice Helland from Queens University, Kingston, Canada Speakers, papers and a provisional programme will be posted at www.womenshistorynetwork.org as soon as they become available. Papers will be considered for special issues of: Women’s History Magazine & Women’s History Review. [email protected] Administrator: Dr. Joyce A. Walker (Women’s History Network) , Department of History, University of Aberdeen, Crombie Annexe, Meston Walk, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3FX E-mail: [email protected] Editorial This edition of the Women’s History Magazine marks a bit of a good examples of how biographical approaches can reveal milestone—it is the tenth edition of the Magazine, which took the kind of nuances that shaped women’s approaches to their over from, and combined many of the functions of, the former worlds.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory Acc.12633 Papers of Dr Sue Innes
    Acc.12633 February 2008 Inventory Acc.12633 Papers of Dr Sue Innes (1948-2005) National Library of Scotland Manuscripts Division George IV Bridge Edinburgh EH1 1EW Tel: 0131-466 2812 Fax: 0131-466 2811 E-mail: [email protected] © Trustees of the National Library of Scotland GB 0233 Acc. 12633 Papers of Dr Sue Innes (1948-2005) 1995-2005 Fonds 0.44 m. Dr Sue Innes was a writer and researcher, and co-ordinator with Engender, the national Scottish women's organisation. After a career in journalism, mainly with Scotsman Publications, she returned to university, graduating with a PhD from the University of Edinburgh in 1998. She taught feminist political theory at the University of Glasgow and held a research fellowship with the Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, Glasgow Caledonian University. She published work on feminism in the 1990s and inter-war period, on women and the Scottish Parliament and on families and care. The papers concern her research into the subjects of citizenship, women and gender studies. The collection contains correspondence, manuscript and typescript research notes, annotated typescripts of research papers, newscuttings and printed materials. Most of the material is undated. Two files containing photocopies of material from the archives of the Royal Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty against Children (RSSPCC) have been destroyed. As the original material is held in Glasgow Caledonian University Archives (http://www.gcal.ac.uk/archives/rsspcc/index.html), it was deemed appropriate to dispose of it. The material has been arranged into four series which reflect Dr Innes’ research and academic interests: 1-26 WOMEN’S ACTIVISM, CITIZENSHIP AND SUFFRAGE 27-34 EDINBURGH WOMEN CITIZENS’ ASSOCIATION AND NATIONAL WOMEN CITIZEN’S ASSOCIATION 35-38 ROYAL SCOTTISH SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN RESEARCH PROJECT 39-45 MISCELLANEOUS Unrestricted access.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Cause : Feminist Campaigns 1918-1928
    1 THE WOMEN'S CAUSE: FEMINIST CAMPAIGNS 1918-1928 Ph.D Thesis / 6r, Vivien Cheryl Law UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION 2 Abstract This thesis shows that the first wave Women's Movement continued the struggle for the franchise during the Great War and throughout the 1920s until its success in 1928. It also details the campaigns for the social and economic emancipation of women in the period from 1918 to 1928. It provides a first step in recovering this history of political activity carried out through a network of women's organizations which expanded to embrace all aspects of women's lives. Chapter 1 acts an introduction and clarifies some questions of treatment and perspective. Chapter 2 describes the Movement's membership and details the suffragists' activities throughout the War and their contribution to the success of the franchise in 1918. In Chapter 3, the consequences for the women's organizations of re-ordering agendas and constitutions because of the vote, is followed in the next three chapters by a detailed examination of the post-War period of reconstruction. This includes the progress of women's political participation, the scale of the reforms it pursued and the economic problems of demobilisation and political opposition. The documentation•of the growth of political confidence and skill in the three General Elections from 1922 to 1924 in 3 Chapter 7, also serves to illustrate the diversity of approach enshrined in the non-party and party organizations. The reappraisal of feminist ideology is set within the context of the development of the equalitarian and welfare theories in Chapter 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroline Phillips: Aberdeen Suffragette and Journalist
    This publication is made freely available under ______ __ open access. AUTHOR(S): TITLE: YEAR: Publisher citation: OpenAIR citation: Publisher copyright statement: This is the ______________________ version of a work originally published by _____________________________ (ISBN ___________________; eISBN ___________________; ISSN __________). OpenAIR takedown statement: Section 6 of the “Repository policy for OpenAIR @ RGU” (available from http://www.rgu.ac.uk/staff-and-current- students/library/library-policies/repository-policies) provides guidance on the criteria under which RGU will consider withdrawing material from OpenAIR. If you believe that this item is subject to any of these criteria, or for any other reason should not be held on OpenAIR, then please contact [email protected] with the details of the item and the nature of your complaint. This publication is distributed under a CC ____________ license. ____________________________________________________ Caroline Phillips: Aberdeen suffragette and journalist Sarah Pedersen The Suffragettes in Scotland Aberdeen Art Gallery holds a unique collection of correspondence that belonged to a woman journalist called Caroline Phillips. As honorary secretary of the Aberdeen branch of the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), otherwise known as the Suffragettes, Caroline Phillips met and corresponded with many of the leaders of the movement and was also involved in the organisation of militant action in Aberdeen. Professor Sarah Pedersen is Professor of Communication and Media at Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen. She is the author of The Scottish Suffragettes and the Press (Palgrave Macmillan 2017). ISBN 978‐1‐907349‐14‐0 Aberdeen Art Gallery holds a collection of correspondence and papers that belonged to a woman journalist called Caroline Phillips.
    [Show full text]