DOCSLIB.ORG

Minerals Management Service Documentation of Section 106 Finding of Adverse Effect (Revised)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minerals Management Service Documentation of Section 106 Finding of Adverse Effect (Revised) Minerals Management Service Documentation of Section 106 Finding of Adverse Effect (Revised) Prepared for Submission to Massachusetts Historical Commission Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(a)(3) for the Cape Wind Energy Project This report was prepared for the Minerals Management Service (MMS) under contract No. M08-PC-20040 by Ecosystem Management & Associates, Inc. (EM&A). Brandi M. Carrier Jones (EM&A) compiled and edited the report with information provided by the MMS and with contributions from Public Archaeology Laboratory, Inc. (PAL), National Park Service Determination of Eligibility, as well as by composing original text. Minerals Management Service Documentation of Section 106 Finding of Adverse Effect (Revised) Prepared for Submission to Massachusetts Historical Commission Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(a)(3) for the Cape Wind Energy Project Brandi M. Carrier Jones, Compiler and Editor Ecosystem Management & Associates, Inc. REPORT AVAILABILITY Copies of this report can be obtained from the Minerals Management Service at the following addresses: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service 381 Elden Street Herndon VA, 20170 http://www.mms.gov/offshore/AlternativeEnergy/CapeWind.htm CITATION Suggested Citation: MMS (Minerals Management Service). 2010. Documentation of Section 106 Finding of Adverse Effect for the Cape Wind Energy Project (Revised). Prepared by B. M. Carrier Jones, editor, Ecosystem Management & Associates, Inc. Lusby, Maryland. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Description of the Undertaking........................................................................................... 2 2.1 Definition of the Area of Potential Effect (APE).................................................... 2 3.0 Efforts to Identify Historic Properties................................................................................. 5 3.1 Onshore Cultural Resources ................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Onshore Archaeological Resources ............................................................. 5 3.1.2 Above-Ground Historic Resources .............................................................. 5 3.2 Offshore Cultural Resources................................................................................. 28 3.2.1 Offshore Historic Archaeological Resources............................................. 28 3.2.2 Offshore Prehistoric Archaeological Resources ........................................ 29 3.2.3 Offshore Traditional Cultural Resources................................................... 29 4.0 Description of Affected Historic Properties ..................................................................... 31 4.1 Twenty-Eight Above-Ground Historic Properties, Including Two National Historic Landmarks........................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Five Onshore Traditional Cultural Properties....................................................... 31 4.3 Description of Nantucket Sound........................................................................... 32 5.0 Description of the Undertaking’s Effects on Historic Properties ..................................... 36 5.1 Effects to Onshore Historic Properties ................................................................. 36 5.1.1 Archaeological Sites .................................................................................. 36 5.1.2 Above-Ground Historic Resources ............................................................ 36 5.1.3 Onshore Individual Traditional Cultural Properties .................................. 37 5.2 Effects to Offshore Historic Properties................................................................. 37 5.2.1 Effects to Historic Archaeological Resources ........................................... 37 5.2.2 Effects to Prehistoric Archaeological Resources....................................... 37 5.2.3 Seabed of Nantucket Sound....................................................................... 38 5.3 Summary............................................................................................................... 39 6.0 Application of the Criteria of Adverse Effect................................................................... 40 6.1 The Viewshed of Twenty-Eight Above-Ground Historic Properties, Including Two National Historic Landmarks.................................................................................... 41 6.2 The Viewshed of Five Traditional Cultural Properties......................................... 41 6.3 Nantucket Sound................................................................................................... 41 6.4 Actions to Avoid, Minimize, or Mitigate Adverse Effects................................... 41 6.4.1 Visual Resources Mitigation...................................................................... 41 iv 6.3.2 Mitigation of Effects to Offshore Submerged Historic/Archaeological Resources .............................................................................................................. 42 6.3.3 Project Mitigation of Effects to TCPs........................................................ 43 7.0 Summary of Consulting Parties’ and Public Views.......................................................... 45 Appendix A: Copies of Views Provided by Consulting Parties during the Section 106 Process for the Cape Wind Energy Project Appendix B: Copies of Correspondence from MMS during the Section 106 Process for the Cape Wind Energy Project Appendix C: Contact Information for Consulting Parties to the Section 106 Process for the Cape Wind Energy Project Appendix D: Technical Memoranda Between MMS and its Consultants and Determination of Eligibility for Nantucket Sound v LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure Description Page 2.1 Map Depicting Location of Proposed Project Area.............................................................4 3.1 Map Depicting Location of View Points Used in Visual Simulations ................................7 3.2 Map Depicting Location of View Points Used in Visual Simulations ................................8 3.3 Map Depicting Location of View Points Used in Visual Simulations ................................9 3.4 Map Depicting Location of View Points Used in Visual Simulations ..............................10 Table Description Page 4.1 Historic Properties that will be Adversely Affected by the Proposed Undertaking ..........35 vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND ACRONYMS Term Abbreviation, Symbol, or Acronym Area of Potential Effects............................................................................................................APE Automated Wreck and Obstruction Information System..................................................... AWOIS Before Present ...........................................................................................................................B.P. Draft Environmental Impact Statement ....................................................................................DEIS Ecosystem Management and Associates, Inc. .......................................................................EM&A Electrical Service Platform ........................................................................................................ESP Feet.................................................................................................................................................. ft Finding of Adverse Effect .........................................................................................................FAE Kilometer(s) ................................................................................................................................ km Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Research .........................................MBUAR Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act office ................................................................... MEPA Massachusetts Historical Commission ................................................................................... MHC Meter(s).......................................................................................................................................... m Mile(s)........................................................................................................................................... mi Minerals Management Service ............................................................................................... MMS National Historic Landmark ..................................................................................................... NHL National Historic Preservation Act .........................................................................................NHPA National Register of Historic Places.......................................................................................NRHP Public Archaeology Laboratory, Inc..........................................................................................PAL Right of Way............................................................................................................................ ROW State Historic Preservation Officer ........................................................................................ SHPO Traditional Cultural Property....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 NANTUCKET HISTORIC DISTRICT Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Nantucket Historic District Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Not for publication: City/Town: Nantucket Vicinity: State: MA County: Nantucket Code: 019 Zip Code: 02554, 02564, 02584 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): Public-Local: X District: X Public-State: Site: Public-Federal: Structure: Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 5,027 6,686 buildings sites structures objects 5,027 6,686 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 13,188 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 NANTUCKET HISTORIC DISTRICT Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPE COD CAPE Capecodwithinreach.Com GUEST GUIDE the Lifestyle to Enjoy All Year Long
    2015 Cape Cod Within Reach CAPE COD The lifestyle to enjoy all year long. ★ HYANNIS YARMOUTH 2015 GUEST GUIDE CapeCodWithinReach.com All ice cream and gelato made on premises! Soft serve available, too! NOTHING TOPS OUR HOMEMADE ICE CREAM except cherries and sprinkles or hot fudge or butterscotch or mixed nuts or whipped cream... TWO GREAT LOCATIONS TO BUY THE BEST ICE CREAM! Look for the blue and yellow chairs and umbrellas at the Christmas Tree shop plaza in Hyannis on Rte. 28 ★new shop★ 645 Iyannough Road/RTE 132 • Hyannis ★new shop★ and next to the Clarion Inn/All Seasons at 5 Theatre Colony Road • South Yarmouth H: 508-568-3600 ★ www.capecodcreamery.com ★ SY: 508-398-8400 Voted one of the best new businesses in Massachusetts by the Boston Globe 2005 CCCreameryCCWR15.indd 1 11/5/14 11:22 AM Cape Cod’s Best Location! • Full service AAA Rated • FREE high-speed Wi-Fi • Scenic Train and Elegant Dinner Train packages available • Custom Golf Packages at the area’s nest golf courses • Special Nauset & Monomoy detached, self-contained building packages - Perfect for your group • Walk to ferries, shing, JFK Museum, bus and Commuter train from Boston 800-242-7829 Call us 1.800.352.7189 stayandplaycapecod.com 259 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 / www.heritagehousehotel.com Hyannis.com · YarmouthCapeCod.com l 1 PRIVATE BEACHES KIDS CLUB SPA OCEANFRONT RESORTS Red Jacket Beach Resort and Spa Blue Water Resort Riviera Beach Resort Green Harbor Resort and our Blue Rock Golf Resort 800-CAPECOD 800-227-3263 RedJacketResorts.com 2 l CapeCodWithinReach.com I L Y S A I L I N G .
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ENERGY FACILITIES SITING BOARD ) Petition of Vineyard Wind LLC Pursuant to G.L. c. ) 164, § 69J for Approval to Construct, Operate, and ) Maintain Transmission Facilities in Massachusetts ) for the Delivery of Energy from an Offshore Wind ) EFSB 20-01 Energy Facility Located in Federal Waters to an ) NSTAR Electric (d/b/a Eversource Energy) ) Substation Located in the Town of Barnstable, ) Massachusetts. ) ) ) Petition of Vineyard Wind LLC Pursuant to G.L. c. ) 40A, § 3 for Exemptions from the Operation of the ) Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Barnstable for ) the Construction and Operation of New Transmission Facilities for the Delivery of Energy ) D.P.U. 20-56 from an Offshore Wind Energy Facility Located in ) Federal Waters to an NSTAR Electric (d/b/a. ) Eversource Energy) Substation Located in the ) Town of Barnstable, Massachusetts. ) ) ) Petition of Vineyard Wind LLC Pursuant to G.L. c. ) 164, § 72 for Approval to Construct, Operate, and ) Maintain Transmission Lines in Massachusetts for ) the Delivery of Energy from an Offshore Wind ) D.P.U 20-57 Energy Facility Located in Federal Waters to an ) NSTAR Electric (d/b/a Eversource Energy) ) Substation Located in the Town of Barnstable, ) Massachusetts. ) ) AFFIDAVIT OF AARON LANG I, Aaron Lang, Esq., do depose and state as follows: 1. I make this affidavit of my own personal knowledge. 2. I am an attorney at Foley Hoag LLP, counsel for Vineyard Wind LLC (“Vineyard Wind”) in this proceeding before the Energy Facilities Siting Board. 3. On September 16, 2020, the Presiding Officer issued a letter to Vineyard Wind containing translation, publication, posting, and service requirements for the Notice of Adjudication and Public Comment Hearing (“Notice”) and the Notice of Public Comment Hearing Please Read Document (“Please Read Document”) in the above-captioned proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Circular
    '^y'-'^.^y -^..;,^ :-<> ii^-A ^"^m^:: . .. i I ecnnicai Heport NMFS Circular Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States. Copepoda: Harpacticoida Bruce C.Coull March 1977 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS National Marine Fisheries Service, Circulars The major respnnsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuationsin the quantity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, development and enforcement of domestic fisheries regulations, surveillance of foreign fishing off United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also assists the fishing industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage insurance and vessel construction subsidies. It collects, analyzes, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. The NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular series continues a series that has been in existence since 1941. The Circulars are technical publications of general interest intended to aid conservation and management. Publications that review in considerable detail and at a high technical level certain broad areas of research appear in this series. Technical papers originating in economics studies and from management in- vestigations appear in the Circular series. NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circulars arc available free in limited numbers to governmental agencies, both Federal and State. They are also available in exchange for other scientific and technical publications in the marine sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Historically Famous Lighthouses
    HISTORICALLY FAMOUS LIGHTHOUSES CG-232 CONTENTS Foreword ALASKA Cape Sarichef Lighthouse, Unimak Island Cape Spencer Lighthouse Scotch Cap Lighthouse, Unimak Island CALIFORNIA Farallon Lighthouse Mile Rocks Lighthouse Pigeon Point Lighthouse St. George Reef Lighthouse Trinidad Head Lighthouse CONNECTICUT New London Harbor Lighthouse DELAWARE Cape Henlopen Lighthouse Fenwick Island Lighthouse FLORIDA American Shoal Lighthouse Cape Florida Lighthouse Cape San Blas Lighthouse GEORGIA Tybee Lighthouse, Tybee Island, Savannah River HAWAII Kilauea Point Lighthouse Makapuu Point Lighthouse. LOUISIANA Timbalier Lighthouse MAINE Boon Island Lighthouse Cape Elizabeth Lighthouse Dice Head Lighthouse Portland Head Lighthouse Saddleback Ledge Lighthouse MASSACHUSETTS Boston Lighthouse, Little Brewster Island Brant Point Lighthouse Buzzards Bay Lighthouse Cape Ann Lighthouse, Thatcher’s Island. Dumpling Rock Lighthouse, New Bedford Harbor Eastern Point Lighthouse Minots Ledge Lighthouse Nantucket (Great Point) Lighthouse Newburyport Harbor Lighthouse, Plum Island. Plymouth (Gurnet) Lighthouse MICHIGAN Little Sable Lighthouse Spectacle Reef Lighthouse Standard Rock Lighthouse, Lake Superior MINNESOTA Split Rock Lighthouse NEW HAMPSHIRE Isle of Shoals Lighthouse Portsmouth Harbor Lighthouse NEW JERSEY Navesink Lighthouse Sandy Hook Lighthouse NEW YORK Crown Point Memorial, Lake Champlain Portland Harbor (Barcelona) Lighthouse, Lake Erie Race Rock Lighthouse NORTH CAROLINA Cape Fear Lighthouse "Bald Head Light’ Cape Hatteras Lighthouse Cape Lookout Lighthouse. Ocracoke Lighthouse.. OREGON Tillamook Rock Lighthouse... RHODE ISLAND Beavertail Lighthouse. Prudence Island Lighthouse SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston Lighthouse, Morris Island TEXAS Point Isabel Lighthouse VIRGINIA Cape Charles Lighthouse Cape Henry Lighthouse WASHINGTON Cape Flattery Lighthouse Foreword Under the supervision of the United States Coast Guard, there is only one manned lighthouses in the entire nation. There are hundreds of other lights of varied description that are operated automatically.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Morse Family and Descendents
    Woods Hole Historical Collection P.O. Box 185 Woods Hole, MA 02543 REGISTER Fish-Morse Collection Accession Number 92-10 1724-1995 and to date 25 boxes FISH-MORSE COLLECTION HISTORY The Fish family of Quissett traces its ancestry to Nathan Fish, born 1660, probably in Sandwich, Massachusetts. His son Samuel was born in Falmouth and so was Samuel’s son Samuel. The second Samuel’s son Thomas (1762-1848) was the founder of the family which settled in the Quissett Harbor area between Falmouth and Woods Hole. Thomas Fish was a ship-builder, fought in the Revolutionary War and later became a teacher, a Justice of the Peace and a Barnstable County Commissioner. Most importantly, he was a representative to the Massachusetts State Legislature for 21 years. This position resulted in long absences from his beloved Quissett. In Falmouth he was important in the Congregational Church and became a Deacon of that church. This title preceded his name for the rest of his life. Thomas built the family “Homestead” on the east side of Quissett Harbor. During the time it was owned by his son Joseph (1804-1899) and later by his grandson, Thomas Dunham Fish (1840-1928), a porch was added to the front of the center-hall five-bay Colonial. Joseph married a lovely lady from Martha’s Vineyard, Albinia Daggett, and this firmly cemented the family to families from the Vineyard, including members of the Yale family. Thomas Dunham Fish married Albina Daggett Yale and Albina’s sister Sarah Smith Boardman Yale married Stephen W. Carey, a man of great influence in the later history of the Quissett Harbor area.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form Date
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1, Name historic Flying Horses Carousel and or common Oak Bluffs Carousel 2. Location street & number 33 Oak Bluffs Avenue not for publication city, town Oak Bluffs vicinity of state Massachusetts code county Dukes code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum x building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence .... site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious £_ object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered ^4_ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military X other- recreation ^ 4. Owner of Property name Mr. James Rvan street & number Ryan Amusement Company, 519 Yarmouth Road city, town Hyannis vicinity of state Massachusetts 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Registry of Deeds, Dukes County Courthouse street & number Main Street city, town Edgartown state Massachusetts 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Inventory of the Historic Assets title of the Commonwealth #9-33 has this property been determined eligible? _ yes ._ no date 1978 __ federal JL_ state __ county local depository for survey records Massachusetts Historical Commission city, town Boston state Massachusetts 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated . x unaltered original site good ruins altered J£ moved date J.a8.4 ^ JLBB3.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Master Plan
    OAK BLUFFS Comprehensive Master Plan Oak Bluffs Planning Board Master Plan Update Committee Adopted April 25, 2019 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................ 4 2 CONDITIONS AND TRENDS .............................. 12 3 COMMUNITY CONCERNS AND GOALS............. 26 4 PROTECTING IMPORTANT RESOURCES ........... 30 4.1 Maintaining And Improving Water Quality ................... 31 4.2 Protecting Oak Bluffs’ Unique Ecosystem ..................... 36 4.3 Maintaining And Enhancing The Beaches ..................... 38 4.4 Maintaining And Improving Open Space Areas ............ 40 4.5 Maintaining / Enhancing Community Character .......... 42 4.6 Managing Coastal Resources ........................................ 48 5 MANAGING GROWTH AND CHANGE ............... 50 5.1 Addressing Housing Needs ........................................... 51 5.2 Enhancing The Downtown And Streetscape ................. 54 5.3 Balancing The Economy With Quality Of Life ............... 62 5.4 Enhancing The Visitor Experience ................................. 68 5.5 Guiding Land Use Activities In The Southern Tier ......... 70 6 ADDRESSING EMERGING ISSUES ..................... 74 6.1 Preparing For Climate Change / Sea Level Rise ............ 75 6.2 Becoming A “Greener” Community .............................. 80 6.3 Becoming More Resilient .............................................. 81 6.4 Addressing Regional Issues ........................................... 82 2 7 MEETING COMMUNITY NEEDS ........................ 84 7.1 Enhancing Community
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS of the PIPING PLOVER in MASSACHUSETTS by George W. Gove, Ashland
    STATUS OF THE PIPING PLOVER IN MASSACHUSETTS by George W. Gove, Ashland On January 10, 1986, the Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) was added to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service list of endangered and threatened species of wildlife. The entire breeding popula­ tion of this species in North America has been estimated at less than 2200 pairs. Piping Plovers breed in the Great Plains from southern Alberta eastward to Minnesota, the Dakotas, and Nebraska; at scattered locations around the Great Lakes; and on the Atlantic Coast from the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the Maritimes to Virginia and the Carolines. They winter along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts from South Carolina to Texas and north­ ern Mexico. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated the Great Lakes population, which is down to less than twenty pairs, as "endangered," a term applied when extinction is imminent, and the Great Plains and Atlantic Coast populations as "threatened" (describing the state that is precursor to "endangered"). The decline of the Atlantic Coast population has been attributed to increasing recreational use and development of ocean beaches. In Massachusetts, the Piping Plover breeds coastally from Salis­ bury south and east to Cape Cod, the islands, and Westport. It is normally found in the state from mid-March through mid-September. This species makes a shallow nest, sometimes lined with fragments of shells, with pebbles, or wrack, along ocean beaches and filled- in areas near inlets and bays. The normal clutch of pale, sand- colored, speckled eggs is four. Incubation is underway by mid- May in Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott M. Melvin Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Field Headquarters, Rt
    STATUS OF PIPING PLOVERS IN MASSACHUSETTS - 1992 SUMMARY Scott M. Melvin Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Field Headquarters, Rt. 135 Westborough, MA 01581 Observers reported a total of 213 breeding pairs of Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) at 58 sites in Massachusetts in 1992 (Table 1) . Breeding pairs are defined as pairs observed with either a nest or unfledged chicks or that exhibit site tenacity and evidence of pair bonding and territoriality. Observer effort in 1992, measured as number of sites surveyed and intensity of census effort at each site, was roughly comparable to previous efforts since 1986. In at least 2 instances, pairs that nested unsuccessfully were believed to have moved to new sites and renested. These pairs were included in counts of pairs at both sites where they nested, but were counted only once in the overall state total (Table 1). Also not included in the state total were 2 birds seen for only 3 days at fisbury Great Pond on Martha's Vineyard, and a single bird that was present at Cockeast Pond in Westport. The 1992 total of 213 pairs is the highest count of Piping Plovers recorded in Massachusetts since comprehensive statewide surveys began in 1985, and represents an increase of 53 pairs over the 1991 count of 160 pairs (Table 2). Numbers increased in 6 bf 7 regions of the state; only Martha's Vineyard/Elizabeth Islands decreased by 1 pair. The largest increases came on the Lower Cape (from 50 to 84 pairs in 1991 vs. 1992) and the Upper Cape (from 21 to 32 pairs).
    [Show full text]
  • Nobska Light Station
    Application for License – Nobska Light Station APPLICATION FOR THE LICENSE TO OPERATE NOBSKA LIGHT STATION 233 Nobska Road Woods Hole village, in the Town of Falmouth, Massachusetts Submitted by the Town of Falmouth December 17, 2014 Application for License – Nobska Light Station TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Required Information: Page A. Applicant name and description of organization 2 B. Proof of non-profit status (if applicable) 3 C. Town of Falmouth proposed use of historic lighthouse 3 D. Type and level of public involvement in proposed preservation 4 effort and subsequent use, including public access plan E. Statement of current financial capability 6 F. Statement of commitment to preserve the historic lighthouse 7 II. Responses to Criteria for Selection A. Rehabilitation and maintenance plan, including proposed alterations 10 (if any) consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation B. Future financial plan to fund restoration and maintenance 13 C. Statement of technical ability to rehabilitate, maintain, and preserve 15 the lighthouse for the term of the license D. State Historic Preservation Officer comments 15 E. Applicant shows proof of insurance 16 III. Summary 16 Contact Information 17 IV. Attachments Required Documentation: A. Annual Financial Reports or Form 990 of the Town of Falmouth, Falmouth Historical Society, Historic Highfield, Inc., Woods Hole Historical Museum and The Woods Hole Community Association B. Documentation of experience related to the rehabilitation or maintenance of a historic property C. Documentation of the Town of Falmouth’s Property Damage and Liability Insurance Additional Information: Site Map; Photographs; History of Nobska Light Station; Projected Cash Flow Pro Formas for Capital and Operations 1 Application for License – Nobska Light Station I.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Board of Harbor Commissioners, 1877 and 1878
    : PUBLIC DOCUMENT .No. 33. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Board of Harbor Commissioners FOR THE YEAR 18 7 7. BOSTON ftanb, &berg, & £0., printers to tfje CommcntntaltJ, 117 Franklin Street. 1878. ; <£ommontocaltl) of Jllaesacfjusetta HARBOR COMMISSIONERS' REPORT. To the Honorable the Senate and the Home of Representatives of the Common- wealth of Massachusetts. The Board of Harbor Commissioners, in accordance with the provisions of law, respectfully submit their annual Report. By the operation of chapter 213 of the Acts of 1877, the number of the Board was reduced from five to three members. The members of the present Board, having been appointed under the provisions of said Act, were qualified, and entered upon their duties on the second day of July. The engineers employed by the former Board were continued, and the same relations to the United States Advisory Council established. It was sought to make no change in the course of proceeding, and no interruption of works in progress or matters pending and the present Report embraces the business of the entire year. South Boston Flats. The Board is happy to announce the substantial completion of the contracts with Messrs. Clapp & Ballou for the enclosure and filling of what has been known as the Twenty-jive-acre 'piece of South Boston Flats, near the junction of the Fort Point and Main Channels, which the Commonwealth by legis- lation of 1867 (chapter 354) undertook to reclaim with mate- rial taken for the most part from the bottom of the harbor. In previous reports, more especially the tenth of the series, the twofold purpose of this work, which contemplated a har- 4 HARBOR COMMISSIONERS' REPORT.
    [Show full text]