DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Manatee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Protecting a gentle giant Manatee Lagoon – An FPL Our environmental promise ® The Florida manatee is a large marine mammal that Eco-Discovery Center At FPL, we understand that caring for the environment is just as important as providing can reach 3,500 pounds and more than 12 feet Visit this “edutainment” center in Palm Beach customers with affordable, reliable power, now long. These gentle, inquisitive marine mammals County. The 16,000-square-foot center features and in the future. were once hunted for their meat and hides. This, engaging hands-on exhibits where visitors learn in part, led to a significant decline in the manatee about these protected and unique creatures as This is reflected in our efforts to protect the air we population, and its eventual protection under well as the natural wonders of the surrounding breathe, the water and land we use and the plants Federal and State laws. Since being listed, the Lake Worth Lagoon. Outdoor observation decks and animals that share our planet. As a clean- manatee population in Florida has increased; allow up-close views of manatees on cold winter energy company, we’re committed and dedicated however, manatees are still protected. days as they bask in the warm water outflows of to minimizing our impact on the environment and the place we all call home. As of 2017, the population in Florida is estimated FPL’s adjacent Riviera Beach Next Generation at more than 6,620; however, impacts from Clean Energy Center. Manatee Lagoon is located at FPL and the NextEra Energy family of companies Florida’s increasing human activity, cold stress, 6000 N. Flagler Dr., West Palm Beach. The center embrace an environmental policy that is part of a red tide and habitat threats pose challenges to offers year-round programs for the entire family. Go company-wide Code of Business Conduct & Ethics. this peaceful mammal. to VisitManateeLagoon.com for the latest offerings. Each year, every employee reaffirms this pledge Admission and parking are free. in writing. Florida Power & Light Company supports manatee research through aerial surveys at its facilities to How can you help? help assess the health of manatee herds. » Follow all signs when boating in Our promise in action waters inhabited by manatees. Manatees are seriously injured or Our passion for protecting the environment is very personal. After all, we live here too. Wildlife Alert: killed due to collisions with boats. 1-888-404-FWCC cell *FWC or #FWC (3922) Report collisions, sick, dead or injured mana » Purchase a “Save the Manatee” and any wildlife or boating law violations.tees That’s why we work closely with federal, state and license plate. Funds from the sale community organizations to help minimize impacts support manatee research and conservation on natural resources and protect the Sunshine programs across the state. State’s wild treasures. In addition, we’re constantly working to improve our standards by building cleaner power plants. Through our environmental programs, we’re helping to minimize habitat loss from construction and Florida Manatee reduce water use. We work every day to make the Sunshine State a better place for all of us, including our wild treasures like the Florida manatee. For more information on the Florida manatee Changing the way Resources and other Florida wildlife, please visit FPL.com/manatee Courtesy of FPL Manatee Lagoon: we can all help protect VisitManateeLagoon.com Manatees are susceptible to cold Florida’s wild treasures temperatures. When the water temperature Florida Power & Light Company: drops into the low 60s, manatees can FPL.com/manatee experience cold stress and possibly die if they Marine Mammal Commission: do not find warmer waters. During the winter, mmc.gov many manatees take refuge near coastal power plants that cycle water to cool their Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission: systems. The outflows produce warm-water myfwc.com havens even on the coldest days. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: fws.gov EN001-1708_42734 Tallahassee Jacksonville Edward Ball Wakulla Springs State Park Lake City Atlantic Wakulla and Ocean St. Marks Rivers Fanning Springs State Park Manatee Springs State Park and Ocala Chassahowitzka NWR Daytona Beach Blue Spring Gulf of State Park Merritt Mexico Crystal River Island NWR Homosassa Springs Orlando FPL Cape Canaveral Next Generation Clean Energy Center Melbourne Spring Bayou Tampa St. Petersburg Big Bend Power Station Port St. Lucie Seasonal Warm-Water FPL Manatee Lagoon and Manatee Gathering Areas FPL Riviera Beach Next Generation Clean Energy Center West Palm FPL Fort Myers Plant Beach FPL’s Warm-Water Fort Myers Manatee Gathering Areas Lee County Manatee Park Fort Lauderdale FPL Port Everglades Next Naples Generation Clean Energy Center FPL Lauderdale Plant Seasonal Port of the Islands Warm-Water Manatee Miami Gathering Areas Key West Deutsch, C.J., and J.E. Reynolds, III. 2012. Florida manatee status and conservation issues. IN: Hines, E., J.E. Reynolds, III, A. A. Mignucci-Giannoni, L. V. Aragones, and M. Marmontel (eds.). Sirenian Conservation: Issues and Strategies in Developing Countries. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Manatee Facts ✹ One of the manatee’s closest modern relatives is the elephant Timeline 1973 1979 2001 2010 2016 2017 Federal Endangered Florida Fish & Recorded Recorded Manatee Reclassified Species Act of Wildlife Conservation minimum minimum Lagoon from ✹ Manatees typically move slowly, but 1973 became law Commission listed population population opens endangered to can swim up to 20 miles per hour manatee as estimate of estimate of threatened by endangered species 3,300 manatees 5,077 manatees the U.S. Fish & in Florida Wildlife Service ✹ Adult manatees have no natural predators 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 www.FPL.com/manatee 1972 1975 1977–1978 1978 1996 2010 2017 Federal Manatee FPL started Florida Recorded 282 cold-stress Recorded Marine designated manatee Manatee minimum manatee deaths minimum Mammal as Florida surveys at its Sanctuary population reported population Protection State Marine power plant Act passed estimate of estimate of 6,620 Act passed Mammal locations 2,630 manatees manatees Blue Spring State Park .
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources

    Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources

    Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources Everglades National Park was created primarily because of its unique flora and fauna. In the 1920s and 1930s there was some limited understanding that the park might contain significant prehistoric archeological resources, but the area had not been comprehensively surveyed. After establishment, the park’s first superintendent and the NPS regional archeologist were surprised at the number and potential importance of archeological sites. NPS investigations of the park’s archeological resources began in 1949. They continued off and on until a more comprehensive three-year survey was conducted by the NPS Southeast Archeological Center (SEAC) in the early 1980s. The park had few structures from the historic period in 1947, and none was considered of any historical significance. Although the NPS recognized the importance of the work of the Florida Federation of Women’s Clubs in establishing and maintaining Royal Palm State Park, it saw no reason to preserve any physical reminders of that work. Archeological Investigations in Everglades National Park The archeological riches of the Ten Thousand Islands area were hinted at by Ber- nard Romans, a British engineer who surveyed the Florida coast in the 1770s. Romans noted: [W]e meet with innumerable small islands and several fresh streams: the land in general is drowned mangrove swamp. On the banks of these streams we meet with some hills of rich soil, and on every one of those the evident marks of their having formerly been cultivated by the savages.812 Little additional information on sites of aboriginal occupation was available until the late nineteenth century when South Florida became more accessible and better known to outsiders.
  • Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park Jennifer H

    Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park Jennifer H

    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons GIS Center GIS Center 5-4-2015 Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park Jennifer H. Richards Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, [email protected] Daniel Gann GIS-RS Center, Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/gis Recommended Citation Richards, Jennifer H. and Gann, Daniel, "Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park" (2015). GIS Center. 29. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/gis/29 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the GIS Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GIS Center by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Final Report for VEGETATION TRENDS IN INDICATOR REGIONS OF EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK Task Agreement No. P12AC50201 Cooperative Agreement No. H5000-06-0104 Host University No. H5000-10-5040 Date of Report: Feb. 12, 2015 Principle Investigator: Jennifer H. Richards Dept. of Biological Sciences Florida International University Miami, FL 33199 305-348-3102 (phone), 305-348-1986 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) Co-Principle Investigator: Daniel Gann FIU GIS/RS Center Florida International University Miami, FL 33199 305-348-1971 (phone), 305-348-6445 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) Park Representative: Jimi Sadle, Botanist Everglades National Park 40001 SR 9336 Homestead, FL 33030 305-242-7806 (phone), 305-242-7836 (Fax) FIU Administrative Contact: Susie Escorcia Division of Sponsored Research 11200 SW 8th St. – MARC 430 Miami, FL 33199 305-348-2494 (phone), 305-348-6087 (FAX) 2 Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................
  • Just the Facts: North Fork of the St. Lucie River Water Reservation

    Just the Facts: North Fork of the St. Lucie River Water Reservation

    North Fork of St. Lucie River, page 1 April 2015 North Fork of the St. Lucie River Water Reservation The joint state-federal Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) identifies restoration of the Indian River Lagoon – South as an integral step in achieving systemwide benefits in the south Florida ecosystem. Subject to extreme salinity variations, the St. Lucie Estuary and Indian River Lagoon together are home to more just the than 50 endangered or threatened species. Restoring a more natural volume, timing and FA CTs distribution of flows to the river, floodplain and estuary will give native plant and animal life a better opportunity for recovery. This fact sheet is provided as a The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2000 required the South Florida reference to encourage a greater Water Management District to legally protect water intended for the natural system understanding of the various before any federal funding could be authorized to construct the CERP Indian River issues related to managing Lagoon – South project. The District adopted a water reservation rule for the North water in South Florida. Fork of the St. Lucie River, and construction is underway on the C-44 Reservoir and Stormwater Treatment Area components. Defining water reservations • A water reservation is a legal mechanism to set aside water for the protection of fish and wildlife or public health and safety. When a water reservation is in place, quantities and timing of water flows at specific locations are protected for the natural system. The necessary quantities and timing are determined using data which link local hydrology to the needs of fish and wildlife.
  • Sirenian Feeding Apparatus: Functional Morphology of Feeding Involving Perioral Bristles and Associated Structures

    Sirenian Feeding Apparatus: Functional Morphology of Feeding Involving Perioral Bristles and Associated Structures

    THE SIRENIAN FEEDING APPARATUS: FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF FEEDING INVOLVING PERIORAL BRISTLES AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES By CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS MARSHALL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNrVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REOUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1997 DEDICATION to us simply as I dedicate this work to the memory of J. Rooker (known "Rooker") and to sirenian conservation. Rooker was a subject involved in the study during the 1993 sampling year at Lowry Park Zoological Gardens. Rooker died during the red tide event in May of 1996; approximately 140 other manatees also died. During his rehabilitation at Lowry Park Zoo, Rooker provided much information regarding the mechanism of manatee feeding and use of the perioral bristles. The "mortality incident" involving the red tide event in southwest Florida during the summer of 1996 should serve as a reminder that the Florida manatee population and the status of all sirenians is precarious. Although some estimates suggest that the Florida manatee population may be stable, annual mortality numbers as well as habitat degradation continue to increase. Sirenian conservation and research efforts must continue. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Research involving Florida manatees required that I work with several different government agencies and private parks. The staff of the Sirenia Project, U.S. Geological Service, Biological Resources Division - Florida Caribbean Science Center has been most helpful in conducting the behavioral aspect of this research and allowed this work to occur under their permit (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Permit number PRT-791721). Numerous conversations regarding manatee biology with Dr.
  • Environmental Plan for Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Tributaries (EPKOET)

    Environmental Plan for Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Tributaries (EPKOET)

    Environmental Plan for Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Tributaries (EPKOET) Stephanie Bazan, Larissa Gaul, Vanessa Huber, Nicole Paladino, Emily Tulsky April 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY…………………...………………………………………..4 2. MISSION STATEMENT…………………………………....…………………………………7 3. GOVERNANCE……………………………………………………………………...………...8 4. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL POLICIES…………………………………………..…..10 5. PROBLEMS AND GOALS…..……………………………………………………………....12 6. SCHEDULE…………………………………....……………………………………………...17 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………....17 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………..……………………....18 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure A. Map of the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Watershed…………………………...4 Figure B. Phosphorus levels surrounding the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades Watershed…..5 Figure C. Before and after backfilling of the Kissimmee river C-38 canal……………………….6 Figure D. Algae bloom along the St. Lucie River………………………………………………...7 Figure E. Florida’s Five Water Management Districts………………………………………........8 Figure F. Three main aquifer systems in southern Florida……………………………………....14 Figure G. Effect of levees on the watershed………………………………………...…………...15 Figure H. Algal bloom in the KOE watershed…………………………………………...………15 Figure I: Canal systems south of Lake Okeechobee……………………………………………..16 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Primary Problems in the Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades watershed……………...13 Table 2: Schedule for EPKOET……………………………………………………………….…18 3 1. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The Kissimmee Okeechobee Everglades watershed is an area of about
  • The Giant Sea Mammal That Went Extinct in Less Than Three Decades

    The Giant Sea Mammal That Went Extinct in Less Than Three Decades

    The Giant Sea Mammal That Went Extinct in Less Than Three Decades The quick disappearance of the 30-foot animal helped to usher in the modern science of human-caused extinctions. JACOB MIKANOWSKI, THE ATLANTIC 4/19/17 HTTPS://WWW.THEATLANTIC.COM/SCIENCE/ARCHIVE/2017/04/PLEIST OSEACOW/522831/ The Pleistocene, the geologic era immediately preceding our own, was an age of giants. North America was home to mastodons and saber-tooth cats; mammoths and wooly rhinos roamed Eurasia; giant lizards and bear-sized wombats strode across the Australian outback. Most of these giants died at the by the end of the last Ice Age, some 14,000 years ago. Whether this wave of extinctions was caused by climate change, overhunting by humans, or some combination of both remains a subject of intense debate among scientists. Complicating the picture, though, is the fact that a few Pleistocene giants survived the Quaternary extinction event and nearly made it intact to the present. Most of these survivor species found refuge on islands. Giant sloths were still living on Cuba 6,000 years ago, long after their relatives on the mainland had died out. The last wooly mammoths died out just 4,000 years ago. They lived in a small herd on Wrangel Island north of the Bering Strait between the Chukchi and East Siberian Seas. Two-thousand years ago, gorilla-sized lemurs were still living on Madagascar. A thousand years ago, 12-foot-tall moa birds were still foraging in the forests of New Zealand. Unlike the other long-lived megafauna, Steller’s sea cows, one of the last of the Pleistocene survivors to die out, found their refuge in a remote scrape of the ocean instead of on land.
  • Atypicat Molecular Evolution of Afrotherian and Xenarthran B-Globin

    Atypicat Molecular Evolution of Afrotherian and Xenarthran B-Globin

    Atypicat molecular evolution of afrotherian and xenarthran B-globin cluster genes with insights into the B-globin cluster gene organization of stem eutherians. By ANGELA M. SLOAN A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Zoology University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada @ Angela M. Sloan, July 2005 TIIE I]MVERSITY OF' MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STT]DIES ***** - COPYRIGHTPERMISSION ] . Atypical molecular evolution of afrotherian and xenarthran fslobin cluster genes with insights into thefglobin cluster gene organization òf stem eutherians. BY Angela M. Sloan A ThesislPracticum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfill¡nent of the requirement of the degree of Master of Science Angela M. Sloan @ 2005 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the fiIm, and to University Microfïlms Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright ownér. ABSTRACT Our understanding of p-globin gene cluster evolutionlwithin eutherian mammals .is based solely upon data collected from species in the two most derived eutherian superorders, Laurasiatheria and Euarchontoglires. Ifence, nothing is known regarding_the gene composition and evolution of this cluster within afrotherian (elephants, sea cows, hyraxes, aardvarks, elephant shrews, tenrecs and golden moles) and xenarthran (sloths, anteaters and armadillos) mammals.
  • Everglades to Okeefenokee – a Thousand Miles Through the Heart of Florida

    Everglades to Okeefenokee – a Thousand Miles Through the Heart of Florida

    FLORIDA WILDLIFE CORRIDOR EXPEDITION: EVERGLADES TO OKEEFENOKEE – A THOUSAND MILES THROUGH THE HEART OF FLORIDA The vision of the Florida Wildlife Corridor is to connect natural lands and waters throughout peninsular Florida, from the Everglades to Okeefenokee in southeast Georgia. Despite extensive fragmentation of the landscape in recent decades, a statewide network of connected natural areas is still possible. The first step is raising awareness about the fleeting opportunity we have to connect natural and rural landscapes in order to protect the waters that sustain us, the working farms and ranches that feed us, the forests that clean our air, and the combined habitat these lands provide for Florida’s diverse wildlife, including panthers and black bears. Our goal is to increase public awareness for the Corridor idea through a broad-reaching media campaign, with the Florida Wildlife Corridor Expedition as the center of the outreach strategy. January 17, 2012 marks the kick off the 1000 mile expedition over a 100 day period to increase public awareness and generate support for the Florida Wildlife Corridor. Photographer Carlton Ward Jr, bear biologist Joe Guthrie, conservationist Mallory Lykes Dimmitt and filmmaker Elam Stoltzfus will trek from the Everglades National Park toward Okefenokee National Forest in southern Georgia. They will traverse the wildlife FLORIDA WILDLIFE habitats, watersheds and participating working farms and ranches, which comprise CORRIDOR the Florida Wildlife Corridor opportunity area. KEY ISSUES: The team will document the corridor through photography, video, radio reports, • Protecting and restoring dispersal and daily updates on social media networks, and a host of activities for reporters, migration corridors essential for the landowners, celebrities, conservationists, politicians and other guests.
  • Marine Mammals from the Miocene of Panama

    Marine Mammals from the Miocene of Panama

    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 30 (2010) 167e175 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of South American Earth Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames Marine mammals from the Miocene of Panama Mark D. Uhen a,*, Anthony G. Coates b, Carlos A. Jaramillo b, Camilo Montes b, Catalina Pimiento b,c, Aldo Rincon b, Nikki Strong b, Jorge Velez-Juarbe d a George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA b Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Panama c Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA d Laboratory of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Anatomy, Howard University, WA 20059, USA article info abstract Article history: Panama has produced an abundance of Neogene marine fossils both invertebrate (mollusks, corals, Received 1 May 2009 microfossils etc.) and vertebrate (fish, land mammals etc.), but marine mammals have not been previ- Accepted 21 August 2010 ously reported. Here we describe a cetacean thoracic vertebra from the late Miocene Tobabe Formation, a partial cetacean rib from the late Miocene Gatun Formation, and a sirenian caudal vertebra and rib Keywords: fragments from the early Miocene Culebra Formation. These finds suggest that Central America may yet Panama provide additional fossil marine mammal specimens that will help us to understand the evolution, and Neogene particularly the biogeography of these groups. Miocene Ó Pliocene 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Cetacea Sirenia 1. Introduction archipelago, Panama (Fig. 1A). The Tobabe Formation is the basal unit of the Late Miocene-Early Pliocene (w7.2ew3.5 Ma) Bocas del Central America includes an abundance of marine sedimentary Toro Group, an approximately 600 m thick succession of volcani- rock units that have produced many fossil marine invertebrates clastic marine sediments (Fig.
  • Everglades Ecosystem Assessment: Water Management and Quality, Eutrophication, Mercury Contamination, Soils and Habitat

    Everglades Ecosystem Assessment: Water Management and Quality, Eutrophication, Mercury Contamination, Soils and Habitat

    United States Region 4 Science & Ecosystem EPA 904-R-07-001 Environmental Protection Support Division and Water August 2007 Agency Management Division EPA Everglades Ecosystem Assessment: Water Management and Quality, Eutrophication, Mercury Contamination, Soils and Habitat Monitoring for Adaptive Management: A R-EMAP Status Report The Everglades Ecosystem Assessment Program is being conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division, with the Region 4 Water Management Division cooperating. Many entities have contributed to this Program, including the National Park Service, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida International University, University of Georgia, Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, FTN Associates Incorporated, United States Geological Survey, South Florida Water Management District, and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and the Seminole Tribe of Indians allowed sampling to take place on their federal reservations within the Everglades. EPA 904-R-07-001 August 2007 EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT Water Management and Quality, Eutrophication, Mercury Contamination, Soils and Habitat Monitoring for Adaptive Management A R-EMAP Status Report U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division Athens, Georgia This document is available on the Internet for browsing or download at: <http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/sesdpub_completed.html> Everglades R-EMAP is a program of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 4 Laboratory [the Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD) in Athens, Georgia], with the Region 4 Water Management Division (WMD) cooperating. Everglades R-EMAP is managed by Peter Kalla of SESD.
  • Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades

    Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades

    Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades The Third Biennial Review, 2010 Although the progress of environmental restoration projects in the Florida Everglades remains slow overall, there have been improvements in the pace of restoration and in the relationship between the federal and state partners over the last two years. However, the importance of several challenges related to water quantity and quality have become clear, highlighting the diffi culty in achieving restoration goals for all ecosystem components in all portions of the Everglades. Rigorous scientifi c analyses of the tradeoffs between water quality and quantity and between the hydrologic requirements of Everglades features and species are needed to inform future prioritization and funding decisions. haped by the slow As part of fl ow of water Congress’s mandate Sfrom Lake in the Water Resources Okeechobee to Florida Development Act of Bay, the Everglades was 2000, and with support once a large and diverse from the U.S. Army aquatic ecosystem with Corps of Engineers, millions of acres of the Department of the wetlands, sawgrass Interior, and the state plains, ridges, sloughs, of Florida, the National and tree islands that Research Council provided sanctuary to convened a committee a rich array of plant and Figure 1. Canals and levees have radically altered the fl ow of water in the Everglades, and to conduct a series animal life. However, development has reduced the area of the of biennial evaluations over the past century, ecosystem by half. Source: David Policansky, NRC of progress toward the construction of an achieving the natural extensive network of system restoration canals and levees for fl ood control, water supply, goals of the Restoration Plan.
  • Plan 6 Project Kissimmee River

    Plan 6 Project Kissimmee River

    Upper Chain of Lakes Lake Kissimmee Indian River Lagoon Plan 6 Project Kissimmee River St. Lucie Estuary Lake Stop the destructive Okeechobee discharges to the Caloosahatchee Estuary Northern Estuaries and Everglades Restore the River of Grass Biscayne Ba Florida Bay Coral Reefs Plan 6 Project Flow Historic, Current & Plan 6 Project Flows Plan 6 Project – Stop destructive discharges to the Northern Estuaries and Restore the River of Grass www.FloridaOcean.org Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) Sugarcane Farmlands (Needed for Project) Pubic Lands (Existing) Plan 6 Project – Stop destructive discharges to the Northern Estuaries and Restore the River of Grass www.FloridaOcean.org C-10 A 1. Becomes THE primary outflow for water from Lake Okeechobee S-352 2. Stops destructive discharge releases from S-351 S-354 Lake Okeechobee to the Northern Estuaries 3. Replaces the Lake Okeechobee ASR Project of CERP with a project of greater flow & capacity 4. Restores water flows south from the Lake to the Everglades 5. Provides for healthy water levels in Lake Okeechobee 6. Maintains Water Quantity, Quality, Timing and Distribution for Everglades Restoration WCA 3A Plan 6 Project – Stop destructive discharges to the Northern Estuaries and Restore the River of Grass www.FloridaOcean.org Lake Okeechobee ASR Project- 200 wells – Proposed CERP Current Average Annual 1548 cfs DischargeWhere Volumes the Water Current MaximumGoes Flood Based on 1996-2005 Data Discharge Rates S-308 7300 cfs St Lucie Estuary 20 % C-10 A 442 K AF per Year 900 cfs S-77 2.21 M AF