DOCSLIB.ORG

Dividing Relationship Property – Time for Change? Te Mātatoha Rawa Tokorau – Kua Eke Te Wā?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dividing Relationship Property – Time for Change? Te Mātatoha Rawa Tokorau – Kua Eke Te Wā? October 2017, Wellington, New Zealand | ISSUES PAPER 41 Dividing relationship property – time for change? Te mātatoha rawa tokorau – Kua eke te wā? October 2017, Wellington, New Zealand | ISSUES PAPER 41 Dividing relationship property – time for change? Te mātatoha rawa tokorau – Kua eke te wā? Version: 8 Nov 2017 General information The Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand. Its purpose is to help achieve law that is just, principled, and accessible, and that reflects the heritage and aspirations of the peoples of New Zealand. The Commissioners are: Douglas White – President Donna Buckingham Belinda Clark QSO Helen McQueen The General Manager of the Law Commission is Jasmine Tietjens The office of the Law Commission is at Level 19, 171 Featherston Street, Wellington Postal address: PO Box 2590, Wellington 6140, New Zealand Document Exchange Number: sp 23534 Telephone: (04) 473-3453, Facsimile: (04) 471-0959 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.lawcom.govt.nz A catalogue record for this title is available from the National Library of New Zealand. ISBN: 978-1-877569-82-1 (Online) ISSN: 1177-7877 (Online) This title may be cited as NZLC IP41 This title is also available on the Internet at the Law Commission’s website: www.lawcom.govt.nz Kei te pātengi raraunga o Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa te whakarārangi o tēnei pukapuka. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contents Acknowlegements 4 Have your say 5 Glossary 7 PART A – INTRODUCING THE LAW COMMISSION’S REVIEW 10 Chapter 1 – Context, scope and approach 11 Introduction 11 Social context of this review 12 Scope of this review and our approach so far 14 Structure of this Issues Paper 15 Chapter 2 – Why do we have the PRA? 19 Marriage and property practices in traditional Māori society 19 Post-colonial history of relationship property law 24 The PRA as social legislation 35 Tikanga Māori and the PRA 40 Chapter 3 – What does the PRA do? 45 The framework of the PRA 45 How it works – The PRA rules 53 Application of the PRA on death 61 How New Zealand compares internationally 62 Chapter 4 – What are the big questions of this review? 66 Is the framework of the PRA sound? 66 The big questions 72 Other general issues 81 PART B – WHAT RELATIONSHIPS SHOULD THE PRA COVER? 84 Chapter 5 – Who is covered by the PRA? 85 Introduction 85 Relationships covered by the PRA 85 The inclusion of de facto relationships in the PRA 89 Chapter 6 – The definition of de facto relationship 96 Two people who “live together as a couple” 97 Issues with the definition of de facto relationship 105 Options for reform 118 Chapter 7 – Specific relationship types and family arrangements 124 Māori customary marriages 124 Relationships involving young people 126 Relationships with and between members of the LGBTQI+ community 129 Contemporaneous relationships 131 Multi-partner relationships 134 Domestic relationships 135 PART C – WHAT PROPERTY SHOULD THE PRA COVER? 141 Chapter 8 – What property is covered? 142 Introduction 142 The PRA’s definitions of “property” and “owner” 142 Should the PRA apply to wider economic resources? 145 Is the definition of property future-proof? 149 Exclusion of Māori land from the PRA 153 Chapter 9 – Classifying relationship property and separate property 163 Relationship property, separate property and debts 163 The basis for classification 169 Is the basis for classification appropriate for contemporary New Zealand? 170 Options for Reform 179 Chapter 10 – When separate property becomes relationship property 183 Increasing the value of separate property 184 Applying separate property to relationship property 197 Intermingling of gifts and inheritances with relationship property 199 Implications of moving to a “fruits of the relationship” approach 205 Chapter 11 – Issues with particular types of property & debts 211 ACC and insurance payments 211 Super profits and earning capacity 215 Taonga 226 Heirlooms 233 Student loans 235 Family gifting and lending 239 PART D – HOW SHOULD THE PRA DIVIDE PROPERTY? 242 Chapter 12 – The general rule of equal sharing and exceptions 243 Introduction 243 Equal sharing 243 Extraordinary circumstances 246 Misconduct 250 Dissipations of relationship property 256 Successive and contemporaneous relationships 260 Chapter 13 – Valuation 267 Valuation of Property in the PRA’s overall scheme 267 Determining value 268 Issues and options for reform 274 Chapter 14 – How a court implements a division of property 280 Division orders 280 Interim property orders 291 Non-division orders 299 Protection of rights under the PRA 304 PART E – HOW SHOULD THE PRA TREAT SHORT-TERM RELATIONSHIPS? 309 Chapter 15 – The three year rule 310 Introduction 310 Should the PRA have different rules for short-term relationships? 311 How does the three year rule operate? 312 Should the qualifying period be longer? 316 Options for reform 321 Chapter 16 – Short-term marriages and civil unions 326 The property division rules 326 Issues with sections 14 and 14AA 328 Options for reform 330 Chapter 17 – Short-term de facto relationships 334 Background to section 14A 334 The section 14A(2) test 335 The property division rules 336 Issues with section 14A 336 Options for reform 344 PART F – WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN WHEN EQUAL SHARING DOES NOT LEAD TO EQUALITY? 350 Chapter 18 – Does section 15 achieve post-separation equality? 351 Introduction 351 Historical background 352 What is section 15 trying to achieve? 354 How does section 15 work in practice? 359 Determining the amount of section 15 awards 378 Other issues with section 15 387 Chapter 19 – Options for reform 391 Is reform needed? 391 Common objectives and characteristics of section 15 reform 393 Option 1: Retain section 15 but lower the hurdles that partner A must overcome 397 Option 2: Repeal section 15 and address financial inequality in other PRA rules 400 Option 3: Replace section 15 with financial reconciliation orders 402 PART G – WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO PROPERTY HELD ON TRUST? 423 Chapter 20 – Trusts 424 Introduction 424 The use of trusts in New Zealand 425 Trusts used by New Zealand families 428 The PRA and property held on trust 433 Chapter 21 – The Issues 456 Issue 1: The priority trusts have over rights under the PRA may be causing problems 456 Issue 2: It is unclear whether an interest in a trust is property 469 Issue 3: The Supreme Court’s decision inClayton v Clayton [Vaughan Road Property Trust] did not resolve the tension between the PRA and trusts 475 Issue 4: Remedies outside the PRA to recover property held on trust are inconsistent and create procedural difficulties 478 Issue 5: Section 182 of the Family Proceedings Act 1980 481 Issue 6: Whether there are adequate remedies in the wider law to deal with trusts and rights under the PRA 484 Chapter 22 – Options for Reform 487 Reform is necessary – what are the options? 487 Option 1: Revise the PRA’s definition of “property” to include all beneficial interests in a trust 490 Option 2: Revise the PRA’s definition of “relationship property” to include some property held on trust 494 Option 3: Broaden section 44C 502 Option 4: A new provision modelled on section 182 of the Family Proceedings Act 1980 505 PART H – RESOLVING PROPERTY MATTERS IN AND OUT OF COURT 508 Chapter 23 – How are property matters resolved in practice? 509 Introduction 509 Achieving just and efficient resolution of property matters under the PRA 510 How do people resolve property matters in practice? 517 Chapter 24 – Resolving property matters out of court 523 Do people have access to appropriate information? 523 Is access to legal advice appropriate? 527 Access to dispute resolution services 530 Chapter 25 – Going to court 554 PRA proceedings in the Family Court 554 Is the court process operating effectively? 563 Options to improve the court process 567 Chapter 26 – Jurisdiction of the courts 583 Introduction 583 The Family Court as a specialist court 583 The limited role of the High Court in PRA proceedings 587 The PRA is a (partial) code 588 Issues with the Family Court’s jurisdiction 592 Issues with the High Court’s jurisdiction 613 Options for reforming the jurisdiction of the Family Court and High Court 620 Other jurisdiction issues 628 PART I – HOW SHOULD THE PRA RECOGNISE CHILDREN’S INTERESTS? 638 Chapter 27 – Children and the PRA 639 Introduction 639 How does parental separation affect children? 640 How does the PRA Fit in? 648 Chapter 28 – The case for taking a more child-centred approach under the PRA 652 How does the PRA recognise children’s interests? 652 Should children’s interests have a role in the PRA? 653 Should the PRA take a more child-centred approach? 654 Which children is the PRA concerned about? 661 Minor or dependent children 671 Chapter 29 – Options for reform that take a more child-centred approach 674 Promoting Children’s interests in the principles of the PRA 674 Section 26 678 Postponement of vesting 692 Occupation and tenancy orders 698 Furniture orders 700 Participation of children in PRA proceedings 702 PART J – CAN PARTNERS MAKE THEIR OWN AGREEMENT ABOUT PROPERTY? 705 Chapter 30 – Contracting out of the PRA 706 Introduction 706 The law governing contracting out agreements 707 Are the contracting out provisions are working well? 718 Issues regarding what a contracting out agreement can cover 723 Other issues 733 PART K – SHOULD THE PRA AFFECT THE RIGHTS OF CREDITORS? 744 Chapter 31 – The PRA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sexual Citizenship and the Civil Union Act 2004
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Business and Law 2006 Sexual citizenship and the Civil Union Act 2004 Nan Seuffert University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Seuffert, Nan: Sexual citizenship and the Civil Union Act 2004 2006, 281-306. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/566 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Sexual citizenship and the Civil Union Act 2004 Abstract This article analyses the parliamentary debates on the Civil Union Act 2004, which provides for legal recognition of same sex relationships, for stories of national identity. A close reading of the parliamentary debates on the Act suggests that although the supporters and opponents of the legislation seemed to be worlds apart, many told similar stories about New Zealand as a nation, and citizens within that nation, emphasising similar values and aspirations. Both sides told stories of citizens, of New Zealanders, as tolerant and fair, as forwarding-looking progressives who value stable long-term, committed relationships, warm loving communities for children, and strong families and family relationships. Both sides generally saw marriage as a positive institution, a cornerstone of society and a building block for society and the nation. While some talked of existing alternatives to marriage, such as defacto relationships, and there was some recognition that not all marriages are good ones, with a few notable exceptions, there was little mention of critiques of marriage as an institution and little or no positive mention of relationships outside of the paradigm of long-term committed monogamous relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwisaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions
    PolicyP AdviceA DivisionD Treasury Report: KiwiSaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions Date: 21 October 2005 Treasury Priority: High Security Level: IN-CONFIDENCE Report No: T2005/1974, PAD2005/186 Action Sought Action Sought Deadline Minister of Finance Agree to all recommendations 28 October 2005 Refer to Ministers of Education and Housing Minister of Commerce Agree to recommendations r to dd 28 October 2005 Minister of Revenue Agree to recommendations e to q 28 October 2005 Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Phil Goff) Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Trevor Mallard) Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Clayton Cosgrove) Contact for Telephone Discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone 1st Contact Senior Analyst, Markets, Infrastructure 9 and Government, The Treasury Senior Policy Analyst, Regulatory and Competition Policy Branch, MED Michael Nutsford Policy Manager, Inland Revenue Enclosure: No Treasury:775533v1 IN-CONFIDENCE 21 October 2005 SH-13-0-7 Treasury Report: KiwiSaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions Executive Summary Officials have provided the Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO) with an initial set of drafting instructions on KiwiSaver. However, in preparing these drafting instructions, a range of further issues came to light. We are seeking decisions on these matters now so that officials can provide supplementary drafting instructions to PCO by early November. Officials understand that a meeting may be arranged between Ministers and officials for late next week to discuss the issues contained in this report and on the overall KiwiSaver timeline. A separate report discussing the timeline for KiwiSaver and the work on the taxation of qualifying collective investment vehicles will be provided to you early next week.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Statutes Drafting and Compilation Act 1920
    e31(107) May 2009, Wellington, New Zealand | RepoRt 107 ReVIeW oF tHe StAtUteS DRAFtING AND CoMpILAtIoN ACt 1920 e31(107) May 2009, Wellington, New Zealand | RepoRt 107 ReVIeW oF tHe StAtUteS DRAFtING AND CoMpILAtIoN ACt 1920 the Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand. Its purpose is to help achieve law that is just, principled, and accessible, and that reflects the heritage and aspirations of the peoples of New Zealand. The Commissioners are: Right Honourable Sir Geoffrey palmer SC – president Dr Warren Young – Deputy president emeritus professor John Burrows QC George tanner QC Val Sim the General Manager of the Law Commission is Brigid Corcoran the office of the Law Commission is at Level 19, Hp tower, 171 Featherston Street, Wellington postal address: po Box 2590, Wellington 6140, New Zealand Document exchange Number: sp 23534 telephone: (04) 473-3453, Facsimile: (04) 471-0959 email: [email protected] Internet: www.lawcom.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-publication Data New Zealand. Law Commission. Review of the Statutes Drafting and Compilation Act 1920. (New Zealand. Law Commission. Report ; 107) ISBN 978-1-877316 (pbk.) ISBN 978-1-877316-71-5 (internet) 1. New Zealand. Statutes Drafting and Compilation Act 1920. 2. New Zealand. parliamentary Counsel office. 3. Bill drafting—New Zealand. I. title. II. Series: New Zealand. Law Commission. Report ; 107. 328.930773—dc
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism
    UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognising Non-Conjugal Relationships in New Zealand
    LORRAINE JOHNS RECOGNISING NON-CONJUGAL RELATIONSHIPS IN NEW ZEALAND: SHOULD WE EXTEND THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF MARRIAGE AND MARRIAGE-LIKE RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER CARING RELATIONSHIPS? LLM RESEARCH PAPER LAWS 591: THESIS FACULTY OF LAW 2010 Table of Contents Chapter One I Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 II Structure of Thesis ................................................................................ 4 III Setting the Scene .................................................................................. 5 A What Are Non-Conjugal Relationships? ............................................... 6 B The Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Relationships: Why is This an Important Issue? ....................................................................... 8 C The Demographics of Non-Conjugal Relationships: How Common Are They? ............................................................................................. 9 D Examples of Non-Conjugal Relationships Already Recognised by New Zealand Law ................................................................................ 12 E Recognising Non-Conjugal Relationships - the Human Rights Dimension ........................................................................................... 17 IV Principles for Recognising Personal Relationships ............................... 18 A Equality ............................................................................................... 19 B Autonomy ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, October 20, 2020 Home-Delivered $1.90, Retail $2.20 She Shed Support Sell-Out Mounts for Davis New Covid Strain As Deputy Pm Identified
    TE NUPEPA O TE TAIRAWHITI TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2020 HOME-DELIVERED $1.90, RETAIL $2.20 SHE SHED SUPPORT SELL-OUT MOUNTS FOR DAVIS NEW COVID STRAIN AS DEPUTY PM IDENTIFIED PAGE 2 PAGE 3 PAGE 8 LIVID LANDSCAPE: Artist John Walsh’s painting, When decisions are made from afar, is a direct response to the forestry industry’s devastating impact on the ecology of the East Coast. SEE STORY PAGE 4 Image courtesy of John Walsh and Page Galleries. Picture by Ryan McCauley Multiple injuries from unprovoked JAIL FOR attack by drunk farmer in a fury HELLBENT on attacking a fellow farmer, who socialised in the same group, was a Gisborne man drove for 40 minutes in a fit involved in a situation with a woman. of rage fuelled by vodka, prescription drugs Morrison asked directions to the man’s and cannabis, to get to him, Gisborne District house from his neighbours and told them Court was told. they would “find out later” why he wanted to David Bruce Morrison, 47, was jailed know. The neighbours phoned ahead to warn yesterday for four years and one month, and the victim Morrison, seemingly drunk, was VIOLENT, given a three-strike warning for intentionally on his way. The victim went to his gateway to causing grievous bodily harm to the victim meet him. in an unprovoked incident about 9pm on Morrison immediately launched a vicious, October 11, 2018. prolonged, assault on the man, ultimately He pleaded guilty to the charge and an rendering him unconscious. It was extreme associated one of unlawfully possessing a violence, for which the victim subsequently firearm.
    [Show full text]
  • LAW REFORM and the ADOPTION ACT 1955: a HISTORY of MISFORTUNE Research Paper for LAWS 526: Law Reform and Policy
    ISLA MIRREN DOIDGE LAW REFORM AND THE ADOPTION ACT 1955: A HISTORY OF MISFORTUNE Research Paper for LAWS 526: Law Reform and Policy Submitted for the LLB (Honours) Degree Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington 2016 2 Law Reform and the Adoption Act 1955: A History of Misfortune Law Reform and the Adoption Act 1955: A History of Misfortune The Adoption Act 1955 is now 61 years old and has been passed over for reform on multiple occasions. This paper analyses the failed history of law reform beginning in the year 2000 when a Law Commission Report was issued. This paper identifies why successive attempts by both Labour and National governments failed in reforming adoption over a sixteen year period. Despite multiple attempts at reform, this paper argues that law reform has failed due to a combination of other important governmental priorities, the controversial issues involved in adoption, the ability of the courts to reinterpret the legislation, and the small impact of reform. This paper concludes by using adoption reform as a case study to draw out three main general principles about law reform. The first is the necessity of reform; this paper argues when law reform involves a controversial human rights problem it becomes simultaneously difficult to progress due to political risk, but once that controversy is resolved the reform is no longer considered as necessary. The second is the opportunity to reform; when law reform is seen as less necessary because other agencies are able fix problems within the legislation, other more critical projects will displace a reform project on the hierarchy of political priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Private Law Provisions in the Civil Partnership
    1 Recognition of Foreign Relationships Under the Civil Partnership Act 2004 Introduction The United Kingdom’s Civil Partnership Act 2004 came into effect on 5th December 2005, having received Royal Assent just over a year previously. It creates an institution for same-sex couples, known as “civil partnership”, parallel to but separate from marriage, and it replicates most of the rules of civil marriage in terms of entry, consequences during subsistence, and termination. Opposite-sex couples have no access to this new institution, just as same-sex couples have no access in the UK to the established institution of marriage. Maintaining the exclusivity of both institutions to the different gender mixes was crucial to the Government’s policy in promoting the legislation, designed to avoid the criticism that the Act represented an attack on the institution of marriage1. The United Kingdom was by no means the first country to introduce civil partnership for same-sex couples: the credit goes to Denmark2, though that country was quickly followed in the 1990s by the other Scandinavian countries and in the early 2000s by an increasing number of western and central European countries.3 In addition, civil partnership has been introduced, by a variety of names (the most common of which are “civil union” and “registered partnership”) in other (politically) western jurisdictions, such as some provinces and states in North America4, and New Zealand.5 1 See Civil Partnership: A Framework for the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples (DTI, 2003) at paras 2.7 – 2.8 and Annex B; Civil Partnership Registration: A Legal Status for Committed Same-Sex Couples in Scotland (Scottish Executive 2003) at paras 5.7 – 5.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Centralised Wage Bargaining in New Zealand
    Effects of Centralised Wage Bargaining in New Zealand By Paul Mackay Introduction Productivity and sustainability are the current buzzwords of the New Zealand political conversation, and have been for some time. Despite all the talk, however, there is still no firm consensus on what is needed to create let alone enhance productivity and sustainability. The perpetual political contest between preferences for regulatory or deregulatory approaches continues as strongly as ever. Unsurprisingly, New Zealand’s centre left Labour opposition exhibits a preference for a regulated approach to the economy generally and, in particular, the labour market. It also has expressed interest in returning to a more centralised way of determining wages and conditions of employment. Other than continuing a tradition of adjusting the Minimum Wage on an annual basis, the present national government has tended to stay clear of direct intervention in the setting of wages and conditions at any level. This article examines the New Zealand labour market with specific reference to the effects of centralised versus enterprise level collective bargaining . The evidence presented here suggests that national or industry based approaches to collective bargaining are more likely to be economically damaging than deregulated or enterprise level approaches. Therefore, the conclusions support a minimalist approach to labour market regulation. A short history News Zealand legislative approach to labour relations dates from 1894, with the introduction of the Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1894. Since then, New Zealand has experienced several distinct phases of labour relations and related government intervention in the labour market. Between 1894 and 1987, employment conditions were established through a system of occupationally based awards bargained for at national level.
    [Show full text]
  • What the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Aimed to Do, Why It Did Not Succeed and How It Can Be Repaired
    169 WHAT THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT AIMED TO DO, WHY IT DID NOT SUCCEED AND HOW IT CAN BE REPAIRED Sir Geoffrey Palmer* This article, by the person who was the Minister responsible for the introduction and passage of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, reviews 25 years of experience New Zealand has had with the legislation. The NZ Bill of Rights Act does not constitute higher law or occupy any preferred position over any other statute. As the article discusses, the status of the NZ Bill of Rights Act has meant that while the Bill of Rights has had positive achievements, it has not resulted in the transformational change that propelled the initial proposal for an entrenched, supreme law bill of rights in the 1980s. In the context of an evolving New Zealand society that is becoming ever more diverse, more reliable anchors are needed to ensure that human rights are protected, the article argues. The article discusses the occasions upon which the NZ Bill of Rights has been overridden and the recent case where for the first time a declaration of inconsistency was made by the High Court in relation to a prisoner’s voting rights. In particular, a softening of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, as it applies in the particular conditions of New Zealand’s small unicameral legislature, is called for. There is no adequate justification for maintaining the unrealistic legal fiction that no limits can be placed on the manner in which the New Zealand Parliament exercises its legislative power.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation in New Zealand Statute Law
    WHAT IS DISTINCTIVE ABOUT NEW ZEALAND LAW AND THE NEW ZEALAND WAY OF DOING LAW - INNOVATION IN NEW ZEALAND STATUTE LAW Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Palmer President, Law Commission Paper delivered to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Law Commission, Legislative Council Chamber, Parliament Buildings, Wellington, 25 August 2006 What is this paper about? 1 The threshold question is to define what this paper is about.1 Tests as to what is innovative tend to be subjective. What is meant by “innovative” in the first place? The Oxford English Dictionary makes it plain that innovation is the action of innovating; the introduction of novelties; the alteration of what is established by the introduction of new elements or forms. In one sense, every statute is an innovation. The term is also susceptible to a distinction between those statutes that are innovative as to form and those that are innovative as to policy. Some statutes are known for the novelty and boldness of their policy. Others for the use of intricate and novel legislative techniques, for example the claw back provisions of the Treaty of Waitangi (State Enterprises) Act 1988.2 Some lawyers may admire particular legislative techniques that have no great impact except to implement faithfully the policy of the Act. And that policy may be of no great significance. On the other hand, statutes that are simple in drafting terms may raise enormous controversy leading to a difficult and long parliamentary passage. 2 Contemplating the difficulty of selection, I informally surveyed the Law Commission lawyers as to what they considered to be the three top innovative pieces of legislation in New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Complaint Re S & F Bill V13a Incl HR Director
    OCR scan of letter received Te Tari Whakatau Take Tika Tangata The Office of Human Rights Proceedings 12 October 2005 Level 10 Tower Con tre Cnr Queen & Customs 515 PC Box 6751 Wellesley Street Auckland Telephone: (09) 375-8623 Facsimile: (09) 375-8641 Email: [email protected]. nz Dear Mr Goldsbury RE: YOUR COMPLAINT AGAINST THE FORESHORE AND SEABED ACT 2004 Thank you for your letter dated 15 September responding to my letter dated 19 August 2005 which set out my decision relating to your application for legal representation to take proceedings in the Human Rights Review Tribunal in respect of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. You have asked me not to close your application but to suspend it so that it can be used to support any other similar application by directly affected persons which may be made in the future. If I receive a similar application in the future and if I agree to provide legal representation for proceedings in respect of that application, I will certainly convey to that applicant your willingness to support them with their case. If this occurs and they are agreeable to you being involved I will write to you and advise you of this. I cannot however suspend your application. I have made a decision in your case and in accordance with my usual procedure I will now close your file. Robert Hesketh Director of Human Rights Proceedings Tumuaki Whakatau Take Tika Tangata Human Rights Complaint re S & F Bill v13a Incl HR Director reply 12 Oct Sep05 - Peter Goldsbury 1 15 Sept 2005 Mr Robert Hesketh, The Director of Human Rights Proceedings, 10th Floor, Tower Centre, Corner Queen and Custom Streets PO Box 6751, Wellesley Street, Auckland.
    [Show full text]