DOCSLIB.ORG

Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies College of Social Sciences and Humanities Faculty of Social Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies College of Social Sciences and Humanities Faculty of Social Sciences ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ASSESSMENT OF THE PRACTICES AND ASPECTS OF FARMLAND MANAGEMENT IN GOZAMEN DISTRICT, EAST GOJJAM ZONE, ETHIOPIA BY TADESSE DEJENIE YIZENGAW JUNE, 2011 ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES OF ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ART IN GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES BY TADESSE DEJENIE ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES ASSESSMENT OF THE PRACTICES AND ASPECTS OF FARMLAND MANAGEMENT IN GOZAMEN WOREDA, EAST GOJJAM ZONE, ETHIOPIA By Tadesse Dejenie Approved by Board of Examiners: Dessalegn Wana (PhD) _________________ 1. Department Chair person Signature Assefa Abegaz (PhD) _________________ 2. Advisor Signature Mohammed Assen (PhD) _________________ 3. Internal Examiner Signature ___________________________ _________________ 4. External Examiner Signature Acknowledgement My heart felt gratitude goes to Dr. Assefa Abegaz, my advisor, for his invaluable guidance and constructive criticisms provided starting from the beginning of the proposal up to the write up of this thesis. I extend my thanks to my beloved mother and brother, W/o Yetemegn Hailu and P/Enawgaw Dejenie, who are my inspirations to work hard throughout my studies. My great dept also goes to Bureau of Government Communication Affairs, Environmental Protection and Land Administration and Use, and Agricultural and Rural Development offices of Gozamen woreda for providing relevant information for each I had required. i Table of contents Contents pages List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................v List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. vi Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... vii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... viii Chapter one Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background of the Study ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.3. Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Research Questions ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.5. Methods and Procedures of the Study .................................................................................................... 5 1.5.1. Sampling Techniques ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5.2. Data Collection Instruments and Data Sources .................................................................................... 7 1.5.3. Data Analysis and Interpretation .......................................................................................................... 8 1.6. Description of Variables Used in the Statistical Analysis of Determinants of Adoption and Implementation of Improved Farmland Management Practice .................................................9 1.7. Significance of the Study .........................................................................................................10 1.8. Scope and Limitations of the Study ...................................................................................................... 10 1.9. Thesis organization ................................................................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER TWO Review of Related Literatures .....................................................................................................12 2.1. Sustainable Land Management ................................................................................................12 2.1.1. The concept of Sustainability and Sustainable Land Management ......................................12 ii 2.2. Farmland Management ............................................................................................................14 2.3. Farmland management practices and their Importance ............................................................15 2.4. Land Degradation in Africa .....................................................................................................18 2.5. Land Degradation in Ethiopia ...................................................................................................20 2.6. Major Determinants for Adoption and Implementation of Improved Farmland management practices ...............................................................................................................21 2.6.1. Government Policies and Programs .......................................................................................21 2.6.2. Farmers’ Decisions, Socio-economic and institutional factors............................................. 21 2.6.3. Education, Farmers’ local knowledge and active participation .............................................22 2.6.4. Endowments of Physical and Human capital .........................................................................24 2.6.5. Topography and climate ........................................................................................................24 2.7. Conceptual framework of the study ..........................................................................................25 Chapter Three Descriptions of the Study Area .....................................................................................................27 3.1. Location and size ......................................................................................................................27 3. 2. Relief, climate and Drainage ....................................................................................................28 3.3. Vegetation .................................................................................................................................29 3.4. Soils and Land Use/ Land Cover ..............................................................................................29 3.5. Socio economic characteristics ................................................................................................30 Chapter Four Results and Discussions ...............................................................................................................34 4.1. Attributes of Sample Households ............................................................................................34 4.2. Farmland Management Practices ..............................................................................................36 4.2.1. Soil Fertility Maintaining Practices .....................................................................................36 4.2.1.1. Indigenous Management practices .....................................................................................37 4.2.1.2. Modern management practices ..........................................................................................40 4.2.2 Soil and Water Conservation Measures ..................................................................................43 4.2.2.1. Indigenous Methods ...........................................................................................................44 iii 4.2.2.2. Modern management Methods ..........................................................................................47 4.2.3. Weed and Insect Controlling Practices .................................................................................51 4.2.4. Crop Productivity Increasing Practices ..................................................................................53 4.3. Determining Factors of the Adoption and Implementation of Improved Farmland Management Practices ................................................................................................................57 Chapter Five Conclusion and Recommendations .............................................................................................67 5.1. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 67 5.2. Recommendations .....................................................................................................................69 References……………………………………………………………………………………… .. .72 Appendixes……………………………………………………………………………………… ..77 iv List of Tables Table No pages Table3.1. Division of relief types in Gozamen woreda ..................................................................28 Table3.2. Land use/land cover in Gozamen woreda ........................................................................30 Table4.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • (2) 185-194 Chemical Composition, Mineral Profile and Sensory
    East African Journal of Sciences (2019) Volume 13 (2) 185-194 Chemical Composition, Mineral Profile and Sensory Properties of Traditional Cheese Varieties in selected areas of Eastern Gojjam, Ethiopia Mitiku Eshetu1* and Aleme Asresie2 1School of Animal and Range Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia 2Department of Animal Production and Technology, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the chemical composition, mineral profile and sensory properties of Metata, Ayib and Hazo traditional cheese varieties in selected areas of Eastern Gojjam. The chemical composition and mineral content of the cheese varieties were analyzed following standard procedures. Sensory analysis was also conducted by consumer panelists to assess taste, aroma, color, texture and overall acceptability of these traditional cheese varieties. Metata cheese samples had significantly (P<0.05) lower moisture content and higher titratable acidity than Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. The protein, ash, fat contents of Metata cheese samples were significantly (P<0.05) higher than Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. Moreover, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium contents of Metata cheese samples were significantly (P<0.05) higher than that of Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. Metata cheese samples had also the highest consumer acceptability scores compared to Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. In general, the results of this work showed that Metata cheese has higher nutritional value and overall sensory acceptability.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Rural Household's Livelihood Strategies in Machakel Woreda, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Nation Regional State, Ethiopia
    Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) Vol.8, No.10, 2018 Determinants of Rural Household's Livelihood Strategies in Machakel Woreda, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Nation Regional State, Ethiopia Adey Belete Department of Disaster Risk Management & Sustainable Development, Institute of Disaster Risk Management & Food Security Studies, Bahir Dar University, P.O.Box 5501 Abstract Rural farm households face an increasing need of looking for alternative income sources to supplement their small scale agricultural activities. However, livelihood strategy is determined by complex and yet empirically untested factors in Machakel Woreda. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the determinants of livelihood strategies in the study area. The data were obtained from 144 sample household heads that were selected through a combination of multi-stage sampling like purposive and simple random sampling techniques. Data were collected through key informant interview, focus group discussion and interview schedule. Multinomial logistic regression model used to analyze determinants of livelihood strategies. Data analysis revealed that farm alone activities has a leading contribution to the total income of sample households (69.8%) followed by non-farm activities (17.2%) and off- farm activities (13 %.). Crop production was the dominant livelihood in the study area and land fragmentation, decline in productivity, occurrence of disaster risk like crop and livestock disease, hail storm, flash flood etc. and market fluctuation were major threatens of livelihood. Four livelihood strategies namely farm alone, farm plus non-farm, farm plus off-farm and farm plus non-farm plus off-farm were identified. Age, education level, sex of household head, marital status, credit access, farm land size, livestock holding size , agro-ecology, family size, frequency of extension contact, distance from market and total net income were major determinants of livelihood strategies in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Versus Routine Care on Improving Utilization Of
    Andargie et al. Trials (2020) 21:151 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4002-3 STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Effectiveness of Checklist-Based Box System Interventions (CBBSI) versus routine care on improving utilization of maternal health services in Northwest Ethiopia: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial Netsanet Belete Andargie1,2* , Mulusew Gerbaba Jebena2 and Gurmesa Tura Debelew2 Abstract Background: Maternal mortality is still high in Ethiopia. Antenatal care, the use of skilled delivery and postnatal care are key maternal health care services that can significantly reduce maternal mortality. However, in low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia, utilization of these key services is limited, and preventive, promotive and curative services are not provided as per the recommendations. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of checklist-based box system interventions on improving maternal health service utilization. Methods: A community-level, cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of checklist-based box system interventions over the routine standard of care as a control arm. The intervention will use a health-extension program provided by health extension workers and midwives using a special type of health education scheduling box placed at health posts and a service utilization monitoring box placed at health centers. For this, 1200 pregnant mothers at below 16 weeks of gestation will be recruited from 30 clusters. Suspected pregnant mothers will be identified through a community survey and linked to the nearby health center. With effective communication between health centers and health posts, dropout-tracing mechanisms are implemented to help mothers resume service utilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Land Tenure Security of Women in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation Program
    PROTECTING LAND TENURE SECURITY OF WOMEN IN ETHIOPIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE LAND INVESTMENT FOR TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Workwoha Mekonen, Ziade Hailu, John Leckie, and Gladys Savolainen Land Investment for Transformation Programme (LIFT) (DAI Global) This research paper was created with funding and technical support of the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights, an initiative of Resource Equity. The Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights is a community of learning and practice that works to increase the quantity and strengthen the quality of research on interventions to advance women’s land and resource rights. Among other things, the Consortium commissions new research that promotes innovations in practice and addresses gaps in evidence on what works to improve women’s land rights. Learn more about the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights by visiting https://consortium.resourceequity.org/ This paper assesses the effectiveness of a specific land tenure intervention to improve the lives of women, by asking new questions of available project data sets. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to investigate threats to women’s land rights and explore the effectiveness of land certification interventions using evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation (LIFT) program in Ethiopia. More specifically, the study aims to provide evidence on the extent that LIFT contributed to women’s tenure security. The research used a mixed method approach that integrated quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative information was analyzed from the profiles of more than seven million parcels to understand how the program had incorporated gender interests into the Second Level Land Certification (SLLC) process.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity Among Households with and Without Podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online Food insecurity among households with and without podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia Article (Published Version) Ketema, Kassahun, Tsegay, Girmay, Gedle, Dereje, Davey, Gail and Deribe, Kebede (2018) Food insecurity among households with and without podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia. EC Nutrition, 13 (7). pp. 414-423. ISSN 2453-188X This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/76681/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers' Varietal Selection of Food Barley Genotypes in Gozamin
    American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 17 (3): 232-238, 2017 ISSN 1818-6769 © IDOSI Publications, 2017 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2017.232.238 Farmers’ Varietal Selection of Food Barley Genotypes in Gozamin District of East Gojjam Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia Yalemtesfa Firew Guade Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia Abstract: In this study, the performance of four improved food barley varieties obtained from Holleta Agricultural Research Center and local variety collected from the study area were evaluated in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications under farmers’ participatory selection scheme during 2016 main cropping season in Gozamin district, East Gojjam Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia. The objectives of this study were to select adaptable and high yielding food barley genotype(s) using farmers’ preferences and to identify farmers’ preference and selection criteria of the study area. Farmers’ set; grain yield, early maturity, tillering ability and spike length as their selection criteria at maturity stage of the crop. The results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant differences among genotypes for all traits tested except number of effective tillers and thousand seed weight which were non-significant at 5% probability level. The improved variety EH-1493 (133 days) was the earliest while local variety (142 days) was the latest. The highest mean grain yield was obtained from HB-1307 (3700 kg ha-1 ) and Cross-41/98 (3133 kg ha-1 ) whereas the lowest from the local variety (1693 kg ha 11). Similarly, HB-1307(5033 kg ha ) and Cross-41/98 (3633.33 kg ha 1) had given comparatively the highest above ground biomass yield which was used as a source of feed for animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire
    Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire Always 001a. Your name: [NAME] Is this your name? ◯ Yes ◯ No 001b. Enter your name below. 001a = 0 Please record your name 002a = 0 Day: 002b. Record the correct date and time. Month: Year: ◯ TIGRAY ◯ AFAR ◯ AMHARA ◯ OROMIYA ◯ SOMALIE BENISHANGUL GUMZ 003a. Region ◯ ◯ S.N.N.P ◯ GAMBELA ◯ HARARI ◯ ADDIS ABABA ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${this_country} ◯ NORTH WEST TIGRAY ◯ CENTRAL TIGRAY ◯ EASTERN TIGRAY ◯ SOUTHERN TIGRAY ◯ WESTERN TIGRAY ◯ MEKELE TOWN SPECIAL ◯ ZONE 1 ◯ ZONE 2 ◯ ZONE 3 ZONE 5 003b. Zone ◯ ◯ NORTH GONDAR ◯ SOUTH GONDAR ◯ NORTH WELLO ◯ SOUTH WELLO ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST GOJAM ◯ WEST GOJAM ◯ WAG HIMRA ◯ AWI ◯ OROMIYA 1 ◯ BAHIR DAR SPECIAL ◯ WEST WELLEGA ◯ EAST WELLEGA ◯ ILU ABA BORA ◯ JIMMA ◯ WEST SHEWA ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST SHEWA ◯ ARSI ◯ WEST HARARGE ◯ EAST HARARGE ◯ BALE ◯ SOUTH WEST SHEWA ◯ GUJI ◯ ADAMA SPECIAL ◯ WEST ARSI ◯ KELEM WELLEGA ◯ HORO GUDRU WELLEGA ◯ Shinile ◯ Jijiga ◯ Liben ◯ METEKEL ◯ ASOSA ◯ PAWE SPECIAL ◯ GURAGE ◯ HADIYA ◯ KEMBATA TIBARO ◯ SIDAMA ◯ GEDEO ◯ WOLAYITA ◯ SOUTH OMO ◯ SHEKA ◯ KEFA ◯ GAMO GOFA ◯ BENCH MAJI ◯ AMARO SPECIAL ◯ DAWURO ◯ SILTIE ◯ ALABA SPECIAL ◯ HAWASSA CITY ADMINISTRATION ◯ AGNEWAK ◯ MEJENGER ◯ HARARI ◯ AKAKI KALITY ◯ NEFAS SILK-LAFTO ◯ KOLFE KERANIYO 2 ◯ GULELE ◯ LIDETA ◯ KIRKOS-SUB CITY ◯ ARADA ◯ ADDIS KETEMA ◯ YEKA ◯ BOLE ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${level1} ◯ TAHTAY ADIYABO ◯ MEDEBAY ZANA ◯ TSELEMTI ◯ SHIRE ENIDASILASE/TOWN/ ◯ AHIFEROM ◯ ADWA ◯ TAHTAY MAYCHEW ◯ NADER ADET ◯ DEGUA TEMBEN ◯ ABIYI ADI/TOWN/ ◯ ADWA/TOWN/ ◯ AXUM/TOWN/ ◯ SAESI TSADAMBA ◯ KLITE
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers Willingness to Participate in Voluntary Land Consolidation in Gozamin District, Ethiopia
    land Article Farmers Willingness to Participate In Voluntary Land Consolidation in Gozamin District, Ethiopia Abebaw Andarge Gedefaw 1,2,* , Clement Atzberger 1 , Walter Seher 3 and Reinfried Mansberger 1 1 Institute of Surveying, Remote Sensing and Land Information, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] (C.A.); [email protected] (R.M.) 2 Institute of Land Administration, Debre Markos University, 269 Debre Markos, Ethiopia 3 Institute of Spatial Planning, Environmental Planning and Land Rearrangement, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 September 2019; Accepted: 10 October 2019; Published: 12 October 2019 Abstract: In many African countries and especially in the highlands of Ethiopia—the investigation site of this paper—agricultural land is highly fragmented. Small and scattered parcels impede a necessary increase in agricultural efficiency. Land consolidation is a proper tool to solve inefficiencies in agricultural production, as it enables consolidating plots based on the consent of landholders. Its major benefits are that individual farms get larger, more compact, contiguous parcels, resulting in lower cultivation efforts. This paper investigates the determinants influencing the willingness of landholder farmers to participate in voluntary land consolidation processes. The study was conducted in Gozamin District, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. The study was mainly based on survey data collected from 343 randomly selected landholder farmers. In addition, structured interviews and focus group discussions with farmers were held. The collected data were analyzed quantitatively mainly by using a logistic regression model and qualitatively by using focus group discussions and expert panels.
    [Show full text]
  • English-Full (0.5
    Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Building Climate Resilient Green Economy in Ethiopia Strategy for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations Wubalem Tadesse Alemu Gezahegne Teshome Tesema Bitew Shibabaw Berihun Tefera Habtemariam Kassa Center for International Forestry Research Ethiopia Office Addis Ababa October 2015 Copyright © Center for International Forestry Research, 2015 Cover photo by authors FOREWORD This regional strategy document for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State, with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations, was produced as one of the outputs of a project entitled “Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy”, and implemented between September 2013 and August 2015. CIFOR and our ministry actively collaborated in the planning and implementation of the project, which involved over 25 senior experts drawn from Federal ministries, regional bureaus, Federal and regional research institutes, and from Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources and other universities. The senior experts were organised into five teams, which set out to identify effective forest management practices, and enabling conditions for scaling them up, with the aim of significantly enhancing the role of forests in building a climate resilient green economy in Ethiopia. The five forest management practices studied were: the establishment and management of area exclosures; the management of plantation forests; Participatory Forest Management (PFM); agroforestry (AF); and the management of dry forests and woodlands. Each team focused on only one of the five forest management practices, and concentrated its study in one regional state.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences
    Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2019). 6(2): 110-117 International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN: 2348-8069 www.ijarbs.com DOI: 10.22192/ijarbs Coden: IJARQG(USA) Volume 6, Issue 2 - 2019 Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2019.06.02.013 A Cross Sectional Study on the Prevalence and Possible Risk Factors of Bovine Schistosomiasis in and Around Gozamen District, Northwest Ethiopia Yezina Mengist1 and Nigussie Yilak2* 1 Gozamen Agricultural Office , East Gojjam, ETHIOPIA 2Shewa Robit Municipal Abattoir, Shewa Robit, ETHIOPIA *Corresponding author: Nigussie Yilak; email: [email protected] Abstract A cross sectional study was conducted from April, 2017 to July 2017 in and around Gozamen district to estimate the prevalence and possible risk factors of bovine Schistosomiasis. Simple random sampling was used to select the study animals and sedimentation technique. Out of 384 faecal samples examined 101(26.3%) were found positive for bovine Schistosomiasis. The prevalence of bovine Schistosomiasis was higher in local breed cattle (29.3%) than cross breed cattle (16.1%). Similarly, the prevalence of the disease in male and female cattle was 26.2% and 26.4%, respectively. Cattle having less than 2 years, 2-5years and greater than 5 years old had (18.8%), (28.7%) and (26.0%) disease prevalence, respectively without significant statistical difference (p>0.05). The highest prevalence of Schistosoma infection was observed in poor body conditioned animals (35.5%) followed by medium body conditioned animals (21.1%). Whereas, the lowest prevalence of the disease was observed in good body conditioned animals (11.4%).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    z Available online at http://www.journalcra.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH International Journal of Current Research Vol. 11, Issue, 08, pp.5884-5890, August, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.35811.08.2019 ISSN: 0975-833X RESEARCH ARTICLE MARKET CHAIN ANALYSIS OF BEE HONEY: THE CASE OF AWABEL WOREDA IN EAST GOJJAM ZONE, AMHARA NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA 1Bekalu wube and 2, *Workalemahu Tasew 1Alage Agricultural, Technique and Vocational Education and Training College, Alage, Ethiopia 2Agribusiness and Value Chain Management Program, Hawassa University, PO box 05, Hawassa, Ethiopia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: The study was conducted at Awabel Woreda to analyze the market chain performance of bee honey. Received 10th May, 2019 The area is known for its production of honey. However, market chain of honey is not well Received in revised form understood. The study has focused on market participants, the structure, conduct and performance of 24th June, 2019 honey markets. The research design used for this study was cross sectional survey type. The data were Accepted 12th July, 2019 generated by structured questionnaire, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews. This Published online 31st August, 2019 was supported by secondary data collected from NGO’S, bureau of agriculture and rural development, woreda trade and industry office, CSA, websites, articles, research works and review of Key Words: related literatures. Producers, Collectors, Retailers, Processors and consumers were the main actors in Market chain, honey market chain. Quantity of honey passed through different marketing actors from farmers to Honey, consumers. The Producers- Consumers channel carried the largest volume, which is 38.1% of the Multiple linear regression.
    [Show full text]