DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 Existing Conditions (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2005 Existing Conditions (PDF) WINDHAM MASTER PLAN 2005 Windham Planning Board Nancy Prendergast, Chair 2005 Eileen Maloney, Chair, 2004 Windham Department of Planning and Development Alfred Turner, Director Rebecca Way, Planner Existing Conditions and Analysis – October 2004 VOLUME I of II Taintor & Associates, Inc. in association with Appledore Engineering Howard/Stein-Hudson 20 Unicorn Street Newburyport, MA 01950 Phone 978.462.0404 • Fax 978.462.0107 Acknowledgements This Master Plan was developed over the term of two Planning Boards: Windham Planning Board, 2004 Windham Planning Board, 2005 Eileen Maloney, Chairman Nancy Prendergast, Chairman Nancy Prendergast, Vice Chairman Ross McLeod, Vice-Chairman Ross McLeod, Secretary Ruth-Ellen Post, Secretary Walter Kolodziej, Member Walter Kolodziej, Member Philip LoChiatto, Member Philip LoChiatto, Member Pamela Skinner, Member Pamela Skinner, Member Ruth-Ellen Post, Alternate Bruce Breton, Selectmen Representative Bruce Breton, Selectmen Representative Margaret Crisler, Selectmen Alternate Roy Dennehy, Member – no longer active as of September 2004 Special thanks to Alfred Turner and Rebecca Way And sincere thanks to all who participated in the planning process, including: James Adams, Bruce Anderson, Al Barlow, Earl Bartlett, Dana Call, Greg Cappiello, Alan Carpenter, Margaret Crisler, Jennifer Colvin, Kevin Cyr, Ronald Cyr, Eric DeLong, Anthony DiFruscia, Kara DiFruscia, Bev Donovan, Chris Doyle, Karl Dubay, Elizabeth (Betty) Dunn, Diana Fallon, Barry Goldman, Lynn Goldman, Peter Griffin, Leo Hart, Carl Heidenblad, Nicole Hirsch, Roger Hohenberger, Mike Joanis, Susan Jortberg, John Kelly, John LaRochelle, Fred Linnemann, Lisa Linowes, Margo Logan, Brian McNamara, Tom McPhereson, John Mangan, Jack McCartney, Charles McMahon, Don Messier, Bruce Moeckel, Wayne Morris, Kathy Narkewich, Eric Nickerson, Chris Nickerson, Rex Norman, Dave Poulson, Carol Pynn, Dennis Root, Marc Samsel, Pat Schena, Tim Schreiner, Dennis Senibaldi, Thomas Seniow, Galen Stearns, Miriam Stolz, Dave Sullivan, Dennis Tremblay, Joan Tuck, Mary Lee Underhill, Ralph Valentine, Joseph Vinhais, Bill Wallace, Kevin Waterhouse, Carolyn Webber, Joyce Wong, Pat Yatsevich, and Glen Yergeau. Table of Contents ENVISIONING WINDHAM’S FUTURE ............................................................................... 1 The Process – Windham’s Assets and Liabilities .................................................................. 1 WINDHAM TODAY / WINDHAM TOMORROW ............................................................................. 3 OLD VALUES NEW HORIZONS ± VISION STATEMENT.............................................................. 5 PRIORITIES FOR ACTION ................................................................................................... 7 Alleviating Traffic and Improving Transportation Options ................................................. 7 Growth Management: Maintaining High Quality Public Services and Facilities.............. 10 Ensuring Long-term Water Quality and Supply Protection and Wastewater Treatment .... 12 LAND USE............................................................................................................................... 15 Land Use Trends .................................................................................................................16 Land Use Analysis...............................................................................................................20 Buildout Projections............................................................................................................29 Impact Fees and Growth Management ............................................................................... 30 POPULATION & HOUSING ................................................................................................ 33 Housing ............................................................................................................................... 37 Population and Housing Issues and Challenges ................................................................. 44 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................ 47 REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT.................................................................... 48 Regional Economic Development Trends ........................................................................... 49 PROFILE OF WINDHAM’S ECONOMY........................................................................................ 50 Profile of Existing Businesses ............................................................................................. 51 Geographic Distribution of Existing Businesses................................................................. 54 Employment and Wages ...................................................................................................... 56 Tax Base.............................................................................................................................. 61 CURRENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES ...................................................................... 75 Land Available for Economic Development........................................................................ 76 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES ............................................................................... 76 Loss of commercial land base ............................................................................................. 76 Access to Development Sites ............................................................................................... 76 Route 28 Corridor...............................................................................................................77 Public Infrastructure...........................................................................................................77 COMMUNITY FACILITIES................................................................................................. 79 UTILITIES............................................................................................................................... 87 NATURAL RESOURCES & OPEN SPACE........................................................................ 99 Topography and Geology.................................................................................................... 99 Soils................................................................................................................................... 100 Farmland Soil.................................................................................................................... 103 Slope.................................................................................................................................. 105 Forest Resources............................................................................................................... 105 Fish and Wildlife Resources.............................................................................................. 106 Rare Plants, Rare Animals and Exemplary Natural Communities.................................... 107 Agricultural Resources...................................................................................................... 109 Water Resources................................................................................................................ 109 State Water Quality Assessment........................................................................................ 113 Water Quality Summary.................................................................................................... 114 Wetlands............................................................................................................................ 115 Floodplains ....................................................................................................................... 115 Groundwater Resources.................................................................................................... 116 Potential Threats to Water Resources............................................................................... 118 Open Space........................................................................................................................ 120 Open Lands Inventory ....................................................................................................... 120 Trails/Greenways .............................................................................................................. 124 Regional Open Space Plan................................................................................................ 125 Potentially Developable Lands ......................................................................................... 125 Lands of Interest................................................................................................................ 125 Current Regulatory Programs for Natural Resource and Open Space Protection ........... 129 RECREATION & CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................. 131 Recreational Resources..................................................................................................... 131 Athletic Programs ............................................................................................................. 131 Recreational Facilities ...................................................................................................... 132 Cultural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimack Valley
    Aì Im Aì !"`$ ?{ Aù ?x Ij ?¬ ?¬ Im Ai AÔ Aù AÔ ?x ?v !"b$ Ij AÔ AÙ Aä ?¸ !"`$ ?¨ Im AÕ A£ CÚ ?{ ?x A¢ AÖ Ij ?} ?} ?v Il ?} Aõ A¡ ?} Il Ae AÑ ?} AÙ AÑ fg ?¸ ?} ?} Aù Aä !"b$ A¡ !"`$ ?} Ij AÕ A¤ CÓ ?} CÒ Ij ?¸ AÑ ?} ?} C¹ ?{ #V Im Aõ ?¨ AÑ Aý AÙ Ij AÖ fgA B C D AÕ E F G 4 Lake Winnipesaukee d . Merrymeeting Lake Greenough Pond R ALTON BAY STATE FOREST ROLLINS STATE PARK F R A N K L I N 0 K F R A N K L I N B E L M O N T h B E L M O N T e t N 1 9 PAGE STATE FOREST a o . u Sondogardy Pond Aä 8 r r o Crystal Lake 1 th s NNOORRTTHH FFIIEE LLDD N 6 y S O N w a I . R SSAA LLIISS BB UURRYY E GG I O 6 an H r R E t STATE FOREST NURSERY R m Palmer Pond 3 S l i g 4 E S i 3v . K E G e S A K C e L A . N L k 7 n Marsh Pond 3r t 5 1 MEADOW POND STATE FOREST a r . R-11 N Suncook River F R s M o Tucker Pond 1 New Pond MERRIH MACK VALLEY REGION r Chalk Pond 3 r d Stevens Brook AÑ e o 1 t 5 1 h Forest Pond 4 u Lyford Pond . h AYERS STATE FOREST 4 0 Marchs Pond ?§ H e Shellcamp Pond n fg m r S U T T O N B i t n Merrymeeting River S U T T O N g 6 A a d a .
    [Show full text]
  • Depth Information Not Available for Lakes Marked with an Asterisk (*)
    DEPTH INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE FOR LAKES MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) LAKE NAME COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY GL Great Lakes Great Lakes GL Lake Erie Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Port of Toledo) Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Western Basin) Great Lakes GL Lake Huron Great Lakes GL Lake Huron (w West Lake Erie) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (Northeast) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (South) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (w Lake Erie and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Rochester Area) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Stoney Pt to Wolf Island) Great Lakes GL Lake Superior Great Lakes GL Lake Superior (w Lake Michigan and Lake Huron) Great Lakes AL Baldwin County Coast Baldwin AL Cedar Creek Reservoir Franklin AL Dog River * Mobile AL Goat Rock Lake * Chambers Lee Harris (GA) Troup (GA) AL Guntersville Lake Marshall Jackson AL Highland Lake * Blount AL Inland Lake * Blount AL Lake Gantt * Covington AL Lake Jackson * Covington Walton (FL) AL Lake Jordan Elmore Coosa Chilton AL Lake Martin Coosa Elmore Tallapoosa AL Lake Mitchell Chilton Coosa AL Lake Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa AL Lake Wedowee Clay Cleburne Randolph AL Lay Lake Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Lay Lake and Mitchell Lake Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Lewis Smith Lake Cullman Walker Winston AL Lewis Smith Lake * Cullman Walker Winston AL Little Lagoon Baldwin AL Logan Martin Lake Saint Clair Talladega AL Mobile Bay Baldwin Mobile Washington AL Mud Creek * Franklin AL Ono Island Baldwin AL Open Pond * Covington AL Orange Beach East Baldwin AL Oyster Bay Baldwin AL Perdido Bay Baldwin Escambia (FL) AL Pickwick Lake Colbert Lauderdale Tishomingo (MS) Hardin (TN) AL Shelby Lakes Baldwin AL Walter F.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends of Mercury in Fish Tissue in New Hampshire Waterbodies, 1992–2016
    Status and trends of mercury in fish tissue in New Hampshire waterbodies, 1992–2016 Clement Pond, Hopkinton November 2018 R-WD-17-22 Status and trends of mercury in fish tissue in New Hampshire waterbodies, 1992 – 2016 New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-3503 (603) 271-8865 Robert R. Scott Commissioner Eugene J. Forbes, PE Water Division Director Ted Diers Watershed Management Bureau Administrator Prepared by David Neils, Chief Water Pollution Biologist and Kirsten Nelson, Biologist In conjunction with Scott Ashley and Walter Henderson November 2018 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 Figure 1 – Anthropogenic mercury emissions in the United States, 1990 – 2010 and projected for 2016. Zheng and Jaegl (2013)................................................................................................................................. 2 Table 1 – National and State programs that regulate atmospheric mercury emissions ............................. 3 Table 2 – Primary New Hampshire atmospheric mercury emission sources, 1997 and 2016, NHDES Air Division ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 – Mercury deposition by precipitation in the northeastern United States, 2005-2013. ............... 5 2. METHODS ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Charted Lakes List
    LAKE LIST United States and Canada Bull Shoals, Marion (AR), HD Powell, Coconino (AZ), HD Gull, Mono Baxter (AR), Taney (MO), Garfield (UT), Kane (UT), San H. V. Eastman, Madera Ozark (MO) Juan (UT) Harry L. Englebright, Yuba, Chanute, Sharp Saguaro, Maricopa HD Nevada Chicot, Chicot HD Soldier Annex, Coconino Havasu, Mohave (AZ), La Paz HD UNITED STATES Coronado, Saline St. Clair, Pinal (AZ), San Bernardino (CA) Cortez, Garland Sunrise, Apache Hell Hole Reservoir, Placer Cox Creek, Grant Theodore Roosevelt, Gila HD Henshaw, San Diego HD ALABAMA Crown, Izard Topock Marsh, Mohave Hensley, Madera Dardanelle, Pope HD Upper Mary, Coconino Huntington, Fresno De Gray, Clark HD Icehouse Reservior, El Dorado Bankhead, Tuscaloosa HD Indian Creek Reservoir, Barbour County, Barbour De Queen, Sevier CALIFORNIA Alpine Big Creek, Mobile HD DeSoto, Garland Diamond, Izard Indian Valley Reservoir, Lake Catoma, Cullman Isabella, Kern HD Cedar Creek, Franklin Erling, Lafayette Almaden Reservoir, Santa Jackson Meadows Reservoir, Clay County, Clay Fayetteville, Washington Clara Sierra, Nevada Demopolis, Marengo HD Gillham, Howard Almanor, Plumas HD Jenkinson, El Dorado Gantt, Covington HD Greers Ferry, Cleburne HD Amador, Amador HD Greeson, Pike HD Jennings, San Diego Guntersville, Marshall HD Antelope, Plumas Hamilton, Garland HD Kaweah, Tulare HD H. Neely Henry, Calhoun, St. HD Arrowhead, Crow Wing HD Lake of the Pines, Nevada Clair, Etowah Hinkle, Scott Barrett, San Diego Lewiston, Trinity Holt Reservoir, Tuscaloosa HD Maumelle, Pulaski HD Bear Reservoir,
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 NH Partial Approval Documents
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 1 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 March 16, 2018 Eugene Forbes, P.E., Director New Hampshire Environmental Services Water Division 6 Hazen Drive, Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 Re: 2014 §303(d) List Dear Mr. Forbes, Thank you for submitting New Hampshire's 2014 §303(d) list of water quality limited segments on March 27, 2017. In accordance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and 40 CFR §130.7, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has conducted a review of most of the State's list, including supporting documentation, with only a few waters remaining to be analyzed. Based on this review, EPA has determined that the majority of New Hampshire’s list of water quality limited segments (WQLSs) still requiring total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) meets the requirements of §303(d) of the Clean Water Act ("CWA" or "the Act") and EPA implementing regulations. However, EPA is not taking action at this time to approve or to disapprove the State’s decisions relating to certain assessment zones in the Great Bay Estuary and the State’s decisions on pH for the Upper Portsmouth Harbor, Great Bay Prohib SZ2, and Great Bay-Cond Appr assessment units. Therefore, EPA hereby approves New Hampshire’s 2014 final §303(d) list with the exception of the following: the Little Bay, Bellamy River, Upper Piscataqua River, Portsmouth Harbor, Little Harbor/Back Channel, Cocheco River and Great Bay assessment zones; and the Upper Portsmouth Harbor, Great Bay Prohib SZ2, and Great Bay-Cond Appr assessment units.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016 a Publication of the Canobie Lake Protective Association
    May 2016 A Publication of the Canobie Lake Protective Association Our Mission “To help protect and improve the quality of Canobie Lake and the surrounding watershed, while maintaining and supporting the interests of lake users and watershed property owners.” 2016 MEMBERSHIP DRIVE Our goal is to have all concerned residents join together. We mail this MEMBERSHIP DRIVE newsletter to over 300 residences around Canobie Lake. To all of our past and loyal members, THANK YOU!!!! We continue to welcome anyone to join and demonstrate his or her support for our work to protect Canobie Lake. PLEASE JOIN TODAY and become a MEMBER for 2016 CANOBIE LAKE PARK has, again, generously given us GUEST PASSES to be used in our membership drive. For each membership you will receive one complimentary guest pass to Canobie Lake Park. While supply lasts, for each additional $25 donation you will receive a guest pass. (All donations of any amount are WELCOME but we must limit the number of passes from donations to insure that we have enough so that all members receive their guest pass). We are continuing our “RECRUITMENT SPECIAL” PLEASE reach out to your neighbors and friends to join the Canobie Lake Protective Association. Current members will receive 1 free pass for each new member recruited. (Just fill in the special recruitment information on the membership form below.) TO JOIN: fill in and send with your tax deductible check for $25 to the Canobie Lake Protective Association TO MAKE A DONATION: Due to recent legal and engineering consultant expenses any additional donations included in your check are encouraged and gratefully accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology and Water Quality of Stratified-Drift Aquifers in the Lower Merrimack and Coastal River Basins, Southeastern New Hampshire
    Click here to return to USGS publications Geohydrology and Water Quality of Stratified-Drift Aquifers in the Lower Merrimack and Coastal River Basins, Southeastern New Hampshire U.S . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4025 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ponds . Figure 13 shows a typical seismic-reflection parameter differed according to the likely range of profile for a traverse across the western shore of each parameter. Cobbetts Pond in a region of hydrologic connection The results of the analysis of each change in between pond and aquifer. Hydraulic conductivity parameter value are shown in figures 18 and 19 for of the pond bottom was assumed to be 2 ft/d), and an east-west profile along column 44 (fig. 15) . The the thickness of the material was assumed to be 2 ft. profile includes the hypothetical production well of These estimates were based on values calculated for largest simulated discharge (0.135 Mgal/d) and rep- riverbed deposits (Haeni, 1978; de Lima, 1989), and resents an area of the model (column 44, row 11) were assumed to be representative of the pond-bot- where the greatest difference in drawdowns oc- tom hydrology . curred between simulations . The computed per- The final parameter, specific yield, was es- centage changes in storage and leakage and the timated to be 0.2 for this unconfined aquifer and was drawdowns for each simulation are listed for com- assigned to the entire model area. parison in table 5. It should be emphasized that these data represent changes in two of three com- ponents of recharge, aquifer storage, and pond and Application of numerical model river leakage .
    [Show full text]
  • Flood of May 2006 in New Hampshire
    Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood of May 2006 in New Hampshire Open-File Report 2007–1122 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photograph showing Cocheco River near Rochester, New Hampshire streamgage during the flood of May 2006. Flood of May 2006 in New Hampshire By Scott A. Olson Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency Open-File Report 2007–1122 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Olson, S.A., 2007, Flood of May 2006 in New Hampshire: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1122, 32 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Windham Master Plan 2015
    Windham Master Plan January 1, 2015 ___________________________________________________________________ Current Land Use Adopted July 29, 2015 1 | Current Land Use Windham Master Plan January 1, 2015 ___________________________________________________________________ Current Land Use Introduction The Town of Windham has experienced significant growth over the past decade. Between 2000 and 2013, the population of Windham increased by 30.36 percent and the Town of Windham is now the fastest-growing community within the Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission (SNHPC) Region. In addition, the widening of I-93 through the heart of the community is also placing more development pressures on the town and its infrastructure, facilities, and services. Windham’s land and the use of it play a large role in shaping the character and quality of life of the community. The rate, location, and type of growth in Windham not only directly impact the physical appearance of the community, but also have a large impact on the demand and need for public services and facilities. By continuing proactive land use planning, Windham can anticipate and address the demands and impacts of new development and achieve the land use patterns, quality of life, and type of development the community desires. This chapter for the Town’s Master Plan acts as a fundamental planning tool to help the community identify how the land is currently being used so that future challenges and opportunity can be planned for and addressed. Previous Land Use Goals & Objectives The Town’s 2005 Master Plan helped guide the Planning Board in their efforts on supporting land use policies that have served the town well over the years – e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION 10-May-11 BUREAU of TRAFFIC AADT TYPE STATION FC Locationint 1 Int 2 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
    STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10-May-11 BUREAU OF TRAFFIC AADT TYPE STATION FC LOCATIONInt_1 Int_2 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ACWORTH 82 001051 08 NH 123A EAST OF COLD RIVER * * 360 * * 82 001052 08 ALLEN RD AT LEMPSTER TL * * 100 * * 82 001053 09 FOREST RD OVER COLD RIVER * * 200 * * 82 001055 08 COLD RIVER RD OVER COLD RIVER * * 130 * * 82 001056 09 COLD POND ROAD EAST OF HILL ROAD * 260 * * 340 ALBANY 82 003051 07 NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) WEST OF BEAR NOTCH RD * * 1700 * * 82 003052 07 BEAR NOTCH RD NORTH OF KANCAMAGUS HWY (SB-NB) * 850 * * 900 (81003045-003046) 62 003053 02 NH 16 AT TAMWORTH TL (SB-NB) (61003047-003048) * 8200 * * 8000 02 003054 07 NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) AT CONWAY TL (EB-WB) (01003062- * * 1200 * * 01003063) 82 003055 09 DRAKE HILL RD OVER CHOCORUA RIVER * * 170 * * 82 003056 08 DUGWAY RD EAST OF NH 112 * * 340 * * 82 003058 02 NH 16 AT MADISON TL SOUTH (SB-NB) (81003049-003050) * 10000 * * 9300 82 003060 07 NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) OVER TWIN BROOK * * 1400 * * 82 003061 09 DRAKE HILL RD SOUTH OF NH 16 * 230 * * 200 ALEXANDRIA 22 005050 06 NH 104 (RAGGED MOUNTAIN HWY) AT DANBURY TL * * 2700 * * 82 005051 09 SMITH RIVER RD OVER SMITH RIVER * * 40 * * 82 005052 08 FOWLER RIVER RD AT BRISTOL TL * * 830 * * 82 005053 09 MT CARDIGAN RD SOUTH OF WADHAMS RD * * 110 * * 82 005054 09 BROOK RD NORTH OF KUMMERER RD * * 50 * * 82 005055 09 FOWLER RIVER RD EAST OF BROOK RD * * 150 * * 82 005056 08 WEST SHORE RD AT BRISTOL TL * * 1100 * * 82 005057 09 WASHBURN RD EAST OF PATTEN RD * * 240 * * 1 AADT TYPE STATION
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 LIST of THREATENED OR IMPAIRED WATERS THAT REQUIRE a TMDL Mar
    2014 LIST OF THREATENED OR IMPAIRED WATERS THAT REQUIRE A TMDL Mar. 27, 2017 (i.e., Category 5 Impairments - this represtents the Section 303(d) List) Page 1 of 91 (Excluding Fish/Shellfish Consumption Advisories due to Mercury - see Note 3) R-WD-15-11 Notes: 1. See the Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology (CALM) for definitions and details regarding how this list was developed. 2. This list is sorted by Waterbody Type and then Assessment Unit ID. 3. By this note, all marine surface waters in New Hampshire are also included on this list due to statewide fish/shellfish consumption advisories issued because of mercury levels in fish/shellfish tissue. To keep the size of this list manageable, mercury impairment for fish/shellfish consumption are not shown below. 4. TMDL stands for Total Maximum Daily Load study. TMDL schedules are subject to change as funding and resources become available. 5. Waters presented on this list may also be threatened or impaired by other pollutants or nonpollutants that do not require a TMDL. Assessment Water Primary Water Size Use Impairment DES TMDL Source Unit ID Name Town Size Unit Desc Name Category Threatened Priority Name NHEST600030406-01 Salmon Falls River Dover 0.282 Sq. miles Aquatic Life Chlorophyll-a 5-P N Low Source Unknown Dissolved oxygen saturation 5-P N Low Source Unknown Nitrogen (Total) 5-M N Low Source Unknown Oxygen, Dissolved 5-P N Low Source Unknown pH 5-M N Low Source Unknown Fish Consumption Polychlorinated biphenyls 5-M N Low Source Unknown Primary Contact Chlorophyll-a 5-P N Low Source Unknown Recreation Nitrogen (Total) 5-P N Low Source Unknown Shellfishing Dioxin (including 2,3,7,8-TCDD) 5-M N Low Source Unknown Polychlorinated biphenyls 5-M N Low Source Unknown NHEST600030608-01 Cocheco River Dover 0.277 Sq.
    [Show full text]