DOCSLIB.ORG

Ute Indian Tribe Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ute Indian Tribe Brief Appellate Case: 14-4034 Document: 01019258215 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 Page: 1 CASE NO. 14-4034 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE ) UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, ) UTAH, a federally recognized Indian tribe, ) ) ) Plaintiff - Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) THE STATE OF UTAH; WASATCH ) COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State ) of Utah; GARY HERBERT, Governor of the ) State of Utah; SEAN D. REYES, Attorney ) General for the State of Utah; SCOTT SWEAT, ) Wasatch County Attorney; and TYLER J. ) BERG, Wasatch Deputy County Attorney, ) ) Defendants - Appellees. ) On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division The Honorable Judge Dee Benson No. 2:13-cv-01070 APPELLANT’S BRIEF Jeffrey S. Rasmussen Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, Colorado 80027 Telephone: 303-673-9600 Facsimile: 303-673-9155/9839 June 2, 2014 Appellate Case: 14-4034 Document: 01019258215 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 Page: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................................. 2 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES.................................................................................................... 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ....................................................................................................... 3 A. The First Adjudication of the Tribe’s Reservation Boundaries ........................................... 5 B. The State of Utah’s Second Relitigation of the Tribe’s Reservation Boundaries in the Tribe’s Absence .......................................................................................................................... 6 C. The State of Utah’s Third Relitigation of the Tribe’s Reservation Boundaries................... 7 D. The State’s Attempted Fourth Relitigation of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation Boundaries .................................................................................................................................. 8 E. Facts related to Utah’s prosecution of Ute tribal member Lesa Ann Jenkins for on-Reservation misdemeanor offenses ..................................................................................... 10 F. Procedural History of the Action Below ........................................................................... 11 STATEMENT OF STANDARD OF REVIEW ........................................................................... 14 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................................................................... 15 DISCUSSION OF LAW ............................................................................................................... 18 I. THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BECAUSE THE TRIBE WILL SUFFER IRREPARABLE HARM IF THE CURRENT INJUNCTION IS NOT MAINTAINED UPON REMAND ..................................................................................................................................... 18 ii Appellate Case: 14-4034 Document: 01019258215 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 Page: 3 II. THE TRIBE’S RIGHT TO INTERIM INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IS CLEAR AND INDISPUTABLE .......................................................................................................................... 24 A. Likelihood of Success on the Merits .................................................................................. 27 B. Irreparable Harm ................................................................................................................ 28 C. Balance of Harms ............................................................................................................... 30 D. The Public Interest Will Not Be Adversely Affected ........................................................ 31 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 32 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ............................................................................................ 42 CERTIFICATE OF DIGITAL SUBMISSION AND PRIVACY REDACTIONS .................... 363 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ..................................................................................................... 36 iii Appellate Case: 14-4034 Document: 01019258215 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 Page: 4 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893 (9th Cir. 2002) .......................................... 36 Brooks v. Barbour Energy Corp., 804 F.2d 1144 (10th Cir. 1986) ........................................ 29, 32 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ..................................................................... 39 Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 454 F. Supp. 88 (S.D. New York 1978) ................................................................................................................................................... 30 California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) ........................................ 21 Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (W.D. Okla. 2010) ........ 25, 38 Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Hammond, 244 F. Supp.2d 1264 (D. Idaho) .......................................... 35 Comanche Nation v. United States, 393 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (W.D. Okla. 2005) ............................ 34 Decoteau v. District County Court, 420 U.S. 425 (1975) ............................................................. 22 Duchesne County v. Ute Tribe, 522 U.S. 1107 (1998) ..................................................... 10, 11, 12 Farmington v. Benally, 892 P.2d 629 (N.M. App. 1995) ............................................................. 37 G.C. and K.B. Investments, Inc. v. Wilson, 326 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2002) .................................. 30 Hagen v. Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) .................................................................................... 7, 8, 10 Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Okla. Tax Comm'n., 829 F.2d 967 (10th Cir. 1987) .............. 36, 38 Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians, 538 U.S. 701 (2003) ................................................... 36 Jackson v. Carter Oil Co., 179 F.2d 524 (10th Cir. 1950) ..................................................... 31, 32 Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. Maxus Energy Corp., 925 F.2d 556 (2d Cir. 1991) ................... 30 Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma v. Hoover, 150 F.3d 1163 (10th Cir. 1998) .......... 17, 18, 33, 34 Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes, 425 U.S. 463 (1976) .................................. 22, 23 iv Appellate Case: 14-4034 Document: 01019258215 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 Page: 5 Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Pierce, 253 F.3d 1234 (10th Cir. 2001) ....... 24, 25, 36, 37 Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation v. Wagnon, 476 F.3d 818 (10th Cir. 2007) ............................. 32 Ross v. Neff, 905 F.2d 1349 (10th Cir. 1990) ............................................................................... 35 Royal Ins. Co. of Am. v. Quinn-L Capital Corp., 960 F.2d 1286 (5th Cir. 1992)......................... 30 Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma, 874 F.2d 709 (10th Cir. 1989) .... 21, 25, 36, 37 Seymour v. Superintendent, 368 U.S. 351 (1962) ......................................................................... 23 Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463 (1984) ......................................................................................... 24 South Dakota v. Cummings, 679 N.W.2d 484 (S.D. 2004) .......................................................... 36 State v. Valdez, 65 P.3d 1191 (Utah App. 2003) .......................................................................... 24 United Keetoowah Bank of Cherokee Indians v. Oklahoma, 927 F.2d 1170 (10th Cir. 1991) .... 21 United States v. Felter, 752 F.2d 1505 (10th Cir. 1985) .............................................................. 24 Utah v. Ute Indian Tribe, 479 U.S. 994 (1986) .......................................................................... 5, 7 Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 521 F. Supp. 1072 (D. Utah 1981) ................................... 4, 8, 9 Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 773 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir. 1985) ....................................... passim Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 114 F.3d 1513 (10th Cir. 1993) .................................................... passim Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 935 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Utah 1996) ........................................................ 9 Ute Tribe v. Utah, 716 F.2d 1298 (10th Cir. 1983) ........................................................................ 6 Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Stovall, 205 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (D. Kan. 2002) ................... 25, 38 Wyandotte Nation v. Sebelius, 443 F.3d 1247 (10th Cir. 2006) ................................................... 24 Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) ......................................................................................... 15 v Appellate Case: 14-4034 Document: 01019258215 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 Page: 6 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 1151 ..................................................................................................................... 18, 19 18 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) .................................................................................................................... 2 25 U.S.C. § 1321(a)(1) .................................................................................................................. 19 25 U.S.C. § 1738B(b) ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law ([email protected]) Kevin Deeley, Acting Associate General Counsel ([email protected]) Harry J
    Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 36 Filed 02/24/16 Page 1 of 21 Daniel A. Petalas, Acting General Counsel ([email protected]) Lisa J. Stevenson, Deputy General Counsel – Law ([email protected]) Kevin Deeley, Acting Associate General Counsel ([email protected]) Harry J. Summers, Assistant General Counsel ([email protected]) Kevin P. Hancock, Attorney ([email protected]) Claudio J. Pavia, Attorney ([email protected]) FOR THE PLAINTIFF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 999 E Street NW Washington, DC 20463 (202) 694-1650 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION _______________________________________ ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 2:15CV00439 DB ) v. ) ) AMENDED JEREMY JOHNSON ) COMPLAINT ) and ) ) District Judge Dee Benson JOHN SWALLOW, ) ) Defendants. ) ) PLAINTIFF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTY, DECLARATORY, INJUNCTIVE, AND OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Plaintiff Federal Election Commission (“Commission” or “FEC”), for its Complaint against defendants Jeremy Johnson and John Swallow, alleges as follows: Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 36 Filed 02/24/16 Page 2 of 21 INTRODUCTION 1. During the 2009-2010 campaign cycle for federal elections, Utah businessman Jeremy Johnson knowingly and willfully made campaign contributions that violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA” or “Act”) because they exceeded applicable limits and were made in the names of other persons, and former Utah Attorney General John Swallow knowingly and willfully violated FECA by making contributions in the name of another when he caused, helped, and assisted Johnson to advance or reimburse the contributions of straw donors to a candidate for United States Senate. 2. In 2009 and 2010, FECA provided that no person could contribute in excess of $2,400 per election to any federal candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • West. the Most Complete CD-ROM Library
    West. The most complete CD-ROM library "My experence has shown that West CD-ROM is by far in Utah. the superor product available for Utah.... With the Key Number searching capacity I have with West CD-ROM, I have many more research options and abilities. " Eo Hunt, Salt Lae City, UT UTAH REPOR'RTM AND WE'S(I UTAH CODETM ON CD-ROM GIVES YOU: ~ Utah case law as reported in Pacifc Reporter", 2d from 1945 to date ~ uta Attorney General Opinons from 1977 to date ~ uta Admistrative Code ~ Slip Opinions ~ Utah Code ~ State Constitution ~ Uta Court Rules ~ Uta Orders ~ Session laws, as necessar due to legislative action West CD-ROM librares TMgive you West's exclusive editorial enhancements, including West Topics and Key Numbers, for focused results and faster research. NEW-NATURA LAGUAGE SEARCHING! Now searching with PREMISE(i Research Softare makes West CD-ROM research as easy as tying your issue in plai Englsh. ALSO AVAILABLE ON CD-ROM: West's Tenth Circuit Reporter™and West's Federal Distrct Court Reporter™- Tenth Circuit. FIND OUT MORE ABOUT WEST CD-OM LIBRARIES FOR UTAH. CALL 1-800-255-2549 EXT. 746 WEST CD-ROM LIRAS'" For infomiation about other West Publishing products and services, visit us on the Internet at the DRL: http://ww.westpub.com ~\) (§1996 West Publishing 7-9651-1/8-96 16476961 1.334.194.5 I UtaliD UTAH BAR JOURNAL- Published by The Utah State Bar 645 South 200 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Vol. 9 NO.8 October 1996 Telephone (80 I) 53 1-9077 President VISION OF THE BAR: To lead society in the creation of ajustice system Steven M.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Jurisdiction
    Federal Juris diction Federal Bar Association Utah Chapter Newsletter Spring 2012 attorneys admitted to the Utah federal district court bar, President’s Message regardless of FBA membership status. If you’re not sure Like many of you, I’m often bemused whether you’re part of our ranks, our current chapter when I see television commercials roster can be found on Page 3, along with a membership implying that the purchase of a application at the end of this newsletter. For those of particular product will instantly change you who are not FBA members, I invite you to take a my life for the better. For example, I look and learn about the exciting events we’ve got by Jonathan have a difficult time accepting that using planned for the coming year, as well as what you’ve been Pappasideris a certain credit card is my passport to missing out on. global adventure, or that cracking open a specific kind of If you practice in federal court, the FBA offers unique frosty adult beverage will magically turn my living room benefits that you just won’t receive from any other into a spontaneous party. Call me a skeptic (I am an organization. For example, on May 3-5, our Chapter is attorney, after all!), but I’ve always believed that, as the hosting its fifth annual Southern Utah Federal Law old cliché goes, the proof is in the pudding. Which is Symposium in St. George. In addition to CLE why, when a friend cajoled me to join the Utah Chapter presentations featuring eight federal judges, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Suing Sponsors of Terrorism in U.S. Courts: Rubin V
    SUING SPONSORS OF TERRORISM IN U.S. COURTS: RUBIN V. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN AND JESNER V. ARAB BANK, PLC: SCOTUS TRIMS TO STATUTORY BOUNDARIES THE RECOVERY IN U.S. COURTS AGAINST SPONSORS OF TERRORISM AND HUMAN-RIGHTS VIOLATIONS UNDER FSIA AND ATS JEFFREY A. VAN DETTA* I. INTRODUCTION: A TALE OF TWO STATUTES: THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT OF 1976 AND THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE, SECTION 9 OF THE JUDICIARY ACT OF 1789 When the U.S. Supreme Court in the same Term confronts cases requiring interpretation of both the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 19761 and the Alien Tort Statute2, a greater contrast in performing the same judicial task can scarcely be imagined. In each case, the Court was called upon to interpret the reach of a specific federal statute. However, the statute in the FSIA (Section 1610) is a festoon of words. The ATS, by contrast, is but a single sentence, a * John E. Ryan Professor of International Business & Workplace Law, Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.; judicial law clerk to Hon. Roger J. Miner, U.S. 2d Circuit Court of Appeals, New York, 1986-1987; associate and partner at Kilpatrick & Cody (now known as Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton), Atlanta, Georgia, 1988-2000. The author expresses his gratitude to Professor Kathleen Burch, who suggested this topical pairing of cases for a program she asked the author to present at the 25th Annual U.S. Supreme Court Update, Institute of Continuing Legal Education, Atlanta, Georgia, October 18, 2018. Professor Van Detta presented an earlier version of this article at the Law Review’s Volume XXIX Symposium, The Fight Against Trans-Boundary International Crime: Approaches, Methods, and Solutions, Indianapolis, Indiana, March 1, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Connections
    9 | FACULTY CONNECTIONS Faculty Judge/Justice Member(s) with Type of Relationship Relationship United States Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito David Moore Former law clerk U.S. Supreme Court Tom Lee Acquaintance Justice Anthony Kennedy Lisa Grow Sun Former law clerk U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Chief Roberts Tom Lee Acquaintance U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia John Fee Former law clerk U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Tom Lee Former law clerk U.S. Supreme Court United States Court of Appeals Judge Thomas Griffith Tom Lee Close personal relationship U.S. Court of Appeals Kif Augustine-Adams Close professional relationship D.C. Circuit Lynn Wardle Close personal relationship 41 Lisa Sun Personal relationship RonNell Andersen Jones Personal relationship 9: CHAPTER Judge Kent Jordan James Rasband Personal relationship U.S. Court of Appeals Third Circuit Faculty Connections Faculty Judge Thomas Ambro James Rasband Personal relationship U.S. Court of Appeals Third Circuit Judge William A. Fletcher RonNell Andersen Jones Former law clerk, close personal U.S. Court of Appeals relationship Ninth Circuit Judge J. Michael Luttig Lisa Sun Former law clerk U.S. Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson Tom Lee Former law clerk U.S. Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit Hon. Fortunato Benavides Carolina Nunez Former law clerk U.S. Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit Judge John Rogers David Moore Professional and personal relationship U.S. Court of Appeals Lynn Wardle Personal relationship Sixth Circuit Fred Gedicks Close professional relationship Judge Jeff Sutton Tom Lee Acquaintance U.S. Court of Appeals RonNell Andersen Jones Former student, personal relationship Sixth Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook John Fee Acquaintance U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Bar Association ______Utah Chapter
    Federal Bar Association _____________________________ Utah Chapter Ronald N. FederalB CourtOYCE Litigation Practice Seminar Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Little America Hotel 500 South Main Street Salt Lake City, Utah AGENDA 8:00 – 8:15 a.m. 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Welcome & Announcements Lunch Served Kris Angelos, President Speaker: Judge Ted Stewart What Presiding Over Trials has Taught Me and 8:15 - 8:45 a.m. Perhaps Can Teach You The State of the Federal Judiciary Chief Judge Robert Shelby 1:00 - 1:30 p.m. Changes to Civil Scheduling Magistrate Judge Evelyn Furse 8:45 - 9:30 a.m. Federal Jurisdiction 1:30 - 2:15 p.m. Chief Judge Robert Shelby and Pick the Brains, if Any, of the Judges Judge David Nuffer Judge Dee Benson and Judge Dale Kimball 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. 2:15 - 2:30 p.m. Certification of Issues to the Utah Break Supreme Court Judge David Nuffer 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. Reflections of a Retiring Federal 10:00 - 10:15 a.m. Magistrate Judge Break Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. 10:15 - 10:45 a.m. Lessons Learned from My Remembering Ron Boyce First Three Years on the Judge Scott M. Matheson, Jr. Bench Judge Jill Parrish 10:45 – 11:45 a.m. Developments in Bankruptcy 3:30 – 4:00 p.m. Chief Judge R. Kimball Advice from a Senior Senior Mosier and Judge Kevin Federal Judge Anderson Judge David Sam 11:45 – 12:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Radio Giant Mark Levin Endorses Mike Lee for US Senate
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 20 2010 Conservative radio giant Mark Levin endorses Mike Lee for U.S. Senate Author of “Liberty and Tyranny” says Mike Lee is the strongest conservative Alpine, UT, April 20, 2010 — On his nationally syndicated radio program, conservative talk-show host Mark Levin endorsed Mike Lee saying, “By all accounts Senator Bennett is a very nice man, but he is part of the problem. He [Senator Bennett] is very, very moderate. The strongest conservative is Mike Lee. The strongest challenger is Mike Lee. If we can send Mike Lee [and other constitutional conservatives] to Wash- ington they will really shake things up. We must get these constitutionalists elected.” Responding to Levin’s endorsement Mike Lee stated, “It is an honor to have a conservative like Mark Levin endorse my candidacy. We share the view that that the government is too big, too expensive and too intru- sive in our lives. We also hold the philosophy that the only way forward for America is to return to the lim- ited government found in the Constitution.” About Mike Lee: An attorney from Alpine, Utah, Mike has spent his career helping individuals and or- ganizations get overreaching government regulations and control out of their lives and businesses. A life- time student of the Constitution, he graduated from the Brigham Young University Law School. Mike served as a law clerk to Judge Dee Benson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah and later spent time as General Counsel to Governor Jon Huntsman. Mike has twice served as a law clerk to current Su- preme Court Justice Samuel Alito.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory UTAH
    268 Congressional Directory UTAH UTAH (Population 2010, 2,763,885) SENATORS ORRIN G. HATCH, Republican, of Salt Lake City, UT; born in Pittsburgh, PA, March 22, 1934; education: B.S., Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 1959; J.D., University of Pittsburgh, 1962; practiced law in Salt Lake City, UT, and Pittsburgh, PA; senior partner, Hatch and Plumb law firm, Salt Lake City; worked his way through high school, college, and law school at the metal lathing building trade; holds ‘‘AV’’ rating in Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory; member: AFL-CIO; Salt Lake County Bar Association; Utah Bar Association; Amer- ican Bar Association; Pennsylvania Bar Association; Allegheny County Bar Association and numerous other professional and fraternal organizations; honorary doctorate, University of Maryland; honorary doctor of laws: Pepperdine University; Southern Utah University; Widener University, University of Pittsburgh; honorary national ski patroller and other honorary degrees; Senate Republican High Tech Task Force; Congressional International Anti-Privacy Caucus; au- thor of numerous national publications; member, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; married: Elaine Hansen of Newton, UT; children: Brent, Marcia, Scott, Kimberly, Alysa, and Jess; committees: ranking member, Finance; Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; Judiciary; Joint Committee on Taxation; Special Committee on Aging; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 2, 1976; reelected to each succeeding Senate term. Office Listings http://hatch.senate.gov SH–104 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .................................. (202) 224–5251 Chief of Staff.—Michael Kennedy. FAX: 224–6331 Legislative Director.—Jay Khosla. Communications Director.—Antonia Ferrier. Scheduler.—Ruth Montoya. Federal Building, Suite 8402, Salt Lake City, UT 84138 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Lake City Office of Snell & Wilmer Expands with the Addition of Three
    SALT LAKE CITY OFFICE OF SNELL & WILMER EXPANDS WITH THE ADDITION OF THREE ATTORNEYS SALT LAKE CITY (February 01, 2016) – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that attorneys Allison Brown, Todd M. Labrum and Jordan Lee have joined the Salt Lake City office. Brown focuses her practice in commercial real estate. Prior to Snell & Wilmer, she was an extern in the mergers and acquisitions department for Delsol Avocats in Paris, France. Brown received her J.D., cum laude, from Brigham Young University, J. Reuben Clark Law School and a B.A., magna cum laude, from Brigham Young University, Kennedy Center for Allison Brown International Studies. Labrum concentrates his practice in commercial finance. Prior to joining Snell & Wilmer, he was an associate city prosecutor for the Salt Lake City Prosecutor’s Office. Labrum received his J.D. from the University of Illinois College of Law and a B.S. from Brigham Young University. Lee’s practice is concentrated in commercial litigation, employment litigation and employment counseling. She helps employers with matters related to employment discrimination, Todd Labrum arbitration agreements, wage and hour disputes, policies and handbooks, and compliance with federal and state employment laws. Following her law school graduation, Lee worked as an employment attorney in the Orange County office of Snell & Wilmer. Lee then served as a clerk for Federal District Court Judge Dee Benson in the United States District Court for the District of Utah prior to joining the Salt Lake City office of Snell & Wilmer. Lee received her J.D., magna cum laude, from Brigham Young University, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark Memorandum: Spring 1992 J
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons The lC ark Memorandum Law School Archives Spring 1992 Clark Memorandum: Spring 1992 J. Reuben Clark Law Society J. Reuben Clark Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/clarkmemorandum Part of the Judges Commons, Legal Biography Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation J. Reuben Clark Law Society and J. Reuben Clark Law School, "Clark Memorandum: Spring 1992" (1992). The Clark Memorandum. 11. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/clarkmemorandum/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Archives at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The lC ark Memorandum by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTENTS SPRING 1992 H Reese Hansen It Is Given unto You toJudge 2 Dean Sheila K. McCleve Scott W Cameron Editof A Viewfrom the Bench Brigham Young University’s 1 6 Young Judges 8 Charlcs r) Cranncy Carri P Jenkins Associate Editor Dee Bensoiz Carri P Jenkins 14 Conlributing Editor On His Own Schedule Lisa B. Hawkins Linda A Sullivan Art Director ‘1’he Coriolanus Syndrome Is It Virtuous to Be Obstinate? 20 John Snydei Photographer BruceC Hafen Joyce Janctski Judicial Clerkhips Assistant Copy Editor Other Mountain Topsfiom Which to View the World 28 Larry M Boyle Memuranda 34 SPRING 1992 The Clark Memoranduum is published by the J Reuben Clark Law Society and the J Reuben Clark Law School, Biigham Young University Copyright 1992 by Brigham Young University All Kights Reserved Cover Illustration by Brian Ikrshisnick jurisdiction excludes real property, domestic, and probate On the other hand, part of judging is evaluating people A subjects, with a $20,000 limitation on damages sought judge must appraise a lawyer’s reliability, preparedness, and Criminal jurisdiction excludes felony trials However, I truthfulness.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S7277
    December 8, 2020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S7277 works. We will fondly remember Ernie COVID–19, and pharmaceutical stock- than when he was driving Governor with a trademark cigar in hand and a pile development. John Lynch in 2012 and they witnessed smile on his face and the way his pres- Mr. Benor has received numerous an accident. A car had gone through a ence filled every room he entered. We awards throughout his career. In 2012, guardrail, fallen into an embankment, will remember his generous and kind President Barack Obama awarded Mr. and caught fire. Scott pulled over, and spirit, which lifted us all. Benor the Presidential Rank Award of along with an off-duty firefighter, freed Our deepest condolences go to Ernie’s Meritorious Executive, one of the high- a man who was trapped in the vehicle— beloved family, Sharon, Peter, and Jen- est awards that a career Senior Execu- just seconds before it was engulfed in nifer. We mourn your great loss. tive Service member may receive. flames. For his lifesaving action, Scott To Ernie, rest in peace, dear friend.∑ Dave Benor’s impact on public health was honored with a number of awards, f will be felt for years to come both including a Carnegie Medal, a national honor that recognizes those who risk TRIBUTE TO DAVID E. BENOR through his work on a wide variety of public health programs and by the in- their lives to an extraordinary degree Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. President, I spiring example he has provided for the while saving or attempting to save the am honored to thank and congratulate many attorneys with whom he worked lives of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:06-Cv-00669-TC Document 57 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 7
    Case 2:06-cv-00669-TC Document 57 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION BASIC RESEARCH, a Utah limited liability company; KLEIN-BECKER usa, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION a Utah limited liability company, REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY Plaintiffs, RESTRAINING ORDER AND v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DISTROMEX S.A. de CV, a Mexican Case No. 2:06cv669 corporation; SPFM, a Texas limited partnership, Judge Tena Campbell Defendants. Magistrate Samuel Alba Magistrate Paul M. Warner This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Samuel Alba by District Judge Tena Campbell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Before the court is Basic Research and Klein- Becker’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and Preliminary Injunction. Due to the unavailability of either Magistrate Alba or Judge Campbell and the urgent nature of a TRO, the motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner by Chief Judge Dee Benson pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and Utah Local Rule 72-2(c). A hearing on the motion was held November 29, 2006. At the hearing, Plaintiffs were represented by James E. Magelby and Jason A. McNeill, and Distromex S.A. de CV and SPFM Case 2:06-cv-00669-TC Document 57 Filed 01/03/07 Page 2 of 7 (collectively, “Defendants”) were represented by Patricia W. Christensen. The court has carefully considered the motion and supporting memorandum submitted by Plaintiffs.1 After considering the arguments of counsel and taking the motion under advisement, the court RECOMMENDS that the motion be DENIED.
    [Show full text]