DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document +IAS u X El 593 I~ U -- FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE Public Disclosure Authorized PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - RURAL ENERGY PROGRAM IN GEORGIA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized U'-¢, Zr NO.N - / ~. - Public Disclosure Authorized PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - RURAL ENERGY PROGRAM IN GEORGIA July 2006 Prepared By: Dale Shileikis, URS Corp. Miguel Franco, PA Government Services Greg Michaels, PA Government Services Craig VanDevelde, PA Government Services Mariam Bakhtadze, PA Government Services George Ramishvili, PA Government Services George Tcheishvili, PA Government Services Natalia Nikuradze, PA Government Services Prepared For: United State Agency for International Development USAID/Caucasus/Georgia DISCLAMER This information was made possible through support provided by U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Cooperative Agreement No. 114-A-00-05-00106-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Programmatic Environmental Assessment - Rural Energy Program in Georgia TABLE OF CONTENT List of Acronyms ......................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ......................................................... v 1. Introduction and Summary ............................................ 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 2. Project Description ................................................. 3 2.1 The USAID/Caucasus/Georgia Rural Energy Program ........................ 3 2.1.1 O bjective 1: Increased Energy Supply ........................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Objective 2: Improved Management of Local Energy Production ............................... 6 2.1.3 Objective 3: Improved In-Country Capacity In Rural Energy and Alternative Energy Applications .................................................. 6 2.1.3 Objective 4: Improved Capacity to Utilize and Protect the Local Energy Resource Base ....................................................... 8 2.2 Relationship of the PEA to the Rural Energy Program ..................................................... 9 2.2.1 Representative Sites for Rehabilitation of Energy Facilities ....................................... 9 2.2.2 RE and EE Projects ............................................ 9 2.2.3 Natural Resource Management Plans ................................ 9 2.3 Typical Construction Activities ........................................ 11 2.3.1 Small Hydropower Projects ...................................... 12 2.3.2 Natural Gas Distribution Projects .................................. 19 3. Analysis and Alternatives .............................................. 23 3.1 Types of Energy-Related Activities Considered ............................ 23 3.2 Development of Alternatives ......................................... 25 3.3 Description of Alternatives .......................................... 26 3.3.1 Alternative 1- No Action ........................................................... 26 3.3.2 Alternative 2 - Comprehensive Support for Rural Energy Development ................... 26 3.3.3 Alternative 3 - Mid-Scale Energy Infrastructure Support and Development; Preferred Alternative ....................... ................................................. 26 3.3.4 Alternative 4 - RE / EE & IRMP Support and Activities Development ....................... 27 3.3.5 Alternative 5 - Rural Energy Activities Development ................................................ 27 3.4 C om parison of A lternatives ........................................................................ 28 4. Environmental Regulations, Legislation and Policies ........................... 29 4.1 Executive Summary ............................................... 29 4.2 Institutional Framework for Proposed Activities ............................ 30 4.3 Construction / Rehabilitation Permitting and Environmental Policy ............... 31 4.4 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 33 5. Baseline Data / Affected Environment ..................................... 34 5.1 Geology and Soils ................................................ 34 5.1.1 Abhesi .................................................... 35 5.1.2 Dzama (Kekhijvari) ............................................ 36 5.1.3 Kabali ..................................................... 36 5.1.4 Kalauri .................................................... 36 5.1.5 Kakhareti ................................................... 37 5.1.6 Khidistavi .................................................. 37 5.1.7 Lopota (Napareuli) ............................................ 37 5.1.8 Machakhela (Ked-kedi) ......................................... 38 5.1.9 Pshaveli ................................................... 38 5.1.10 Sartichala ................................................. 39 5.2 Water Resources ................................................. 40 5.2.1 Meteorology and Climate ........................................ 40 5.2.2 Hydrology .................................................. 42 5.2.3 Water Quality ................................................ 45 5.3 Biological Resources .............................................. 49 5.3.1 Overview of Major Biomes ....................................... 49 5.3.2 Abhesi .................................................... 53 Programmatic Environmental Assessment - Rural Energy Program in Georgia i 5.3.3 Dzama (Kekhijvari) ............................................ 54 5.3.4 Kabali .................................................... 55 5.3.5 Kalauri .................................................... 57 5.3.6 Kakhareti .................................................. 58 5.3.7 Khidistavi .................................................. 61 5.3.8 Lopota (Napareuli) ............................................ 61 5.3.9 Machakhela (Ked-kedi) ......................................... 63 5.3.10 Pshaveli .................................................. 66 5.3.11 Sartichala ................................................. 67 5.4 Socioeconomics ............................................... 69 5.4.1 Country Overview ............................................ 69 5.4.2 Abhesi .................................................... 70 5.4.3 Dzama (Kekhijvari) ............................................ 71 5.4.4 Kabali .................................................... 72 5.4.5 Kalauri .................................................... 73 5.4.6 Kakhareti .................................................. 73 5.4.7 Khidistavi .................................................. 74 5.4.8 Lopota (Napareuli) ............................................ 74 5.4.9 Machakhela (Ked-kedi) ......................................... 75 5.4.10 Pshaveli .................................................. 75 5.4.11 Sartichala ................................................. 76 5.5 Cultural Resources ............................................... 78 5.5.1 Country Overview ............................................ 78 5.5.2 Abhesi .................................................... 78 5.5.3 Dzama (Kekhijvari) ............................................ 79 5.5.4 Kabali .................................................... 79 5.5.5 Kalauri .................................................... 79 5.5.6 Kakhareti .................................................. 79 5.5.7 Khidistavi .................................................. 80 5.5.8 Lopota (Napareuli) ............................................ 80 5.5.9 Machakhela (Ked-kedi) ......................................... 80 5.5.10 Pshaveli .................................................. 80 5.5.11 Sartichala ................................................. 81 6. Environmental Impacts ............................................... 82 6.1 Methodology: Environmental Screening ................................. 82 6.1.1 Small Hydropower Projects ..................................... 83 6.1.2 Natural Gas Distribution Systems .................................. 84 6.1.3 RE and EE Projects ........................................... 84 6.1.4 Integrated Resource Management Plan Grants ........................ 84 6.2 G eology and Soils ........................................... 85 6.2.1 Significance Criteria ........................................... 85 6.2.2 Small Hydropower Projects ...................................... 85 6.2.3 Natural Gas Distribution System Projects ............................ 86 6.3 Water Resources ............................................... 87 6.3.1 Significance Criteria ........................................... 87 6.3.2 Small Hydropower Projects ...................................... 88 6.3.3 Natural Gas Distribution Projects .................................. 90 6.4 Biological Resources .............................................. 92 6.4.1 Significance Criteria ........................................... 92 6.4.2 Small Hydropower Projects ...................................... 92 6.4.3 Natural Gas Distribution Systems .................................. 95 6.5 Socioeconomics ................................................. 98 6.5.1 Significance Criteria ........................................... 98 6.5.2 Small Hydropower Projects .....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fieldwork on Threatened Vipers In
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSIRCF REPTILES • VOL15, NO & 4 AMPHIBIANS• DEC 2008 189 • 23(1):1–9 • APR 2016 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES The. Chasing Valley Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer of sayi ) inFour Wisconsin: Viper Species and a On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: HighlandA Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................ of Dwarfs: FieldworkRobert W. Henderson on 198 ThreatenedRESEARCH ARTICLES Vipers in Northeastern Turkey . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis1 equestris) in Florida 2 2 ˙ 3 1 Konrad ............................................. Mebert , BayramBrian J. Camposano,Göçmen Kenneth, Mert L. Krysko, Karıs¸ Kevin, Nas¸it M. Enge, I g˘Ellenci ,M. and Donlan, Sylvain and Michael Ursenbacher Granatosky 212 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Section of Conservation Biology, University of Basel, CONSERVATION ALERT St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10, 4056 Basel, Switzerland ([email protected]) . 2World’sDepartment Mammals of Biology,in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Styles and Designs
    Floral Styles and Designs Traditional Styles ........................................................................................................................................... 4 European Period Designs ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Italian Renaissance 1400-1600 .......................................................................................................................... 4 Dutch / Flemish 1600s-1700s ............................................................................................................................. 4 Biedermeier ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 French Floral Designs ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Baroque: Louis XIV 1661-1715 ........................................................................................................................... 5 Rococo: Louis XV 1715-1774 .............................................................................................................................. 6 Neoclassical: Louis XVI 1774-1793 ..................................................................................................................... 6 Empire: Napoleon 1804-1814 ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE ALPINE GARDEN SOCIETY's 60Th SEED LIST 2011-12 Please Read Through These Notes and Also the Notes on the Back O
    WELCOME TO THE ALPINE GARDEN SOCIETY’S 60th SEED LIST 2011-12 Please read through these notes and also the notes on the back of the order forms before completing the forms. The main distribution will begin in December and will continue into the new year. The seeds offered originate from various sources and cannot be guaranteed true to name. Neither The Alpine Garden Society nor any official of the Society can be held responsible for what is supplied. Members are reminded that named cultivars and hybrids cannot be relied upon to come true, and plants raised from seed from cultivars should not be labelled with the names of those cultivars. Seeds of many species are in short supply and we can never have enough to meet all requests. Members who request very rare or popular species must realise that they are likely to be disappointed and are advised to spread their requests throughout a variety of seeds on the list. Surplus seeds are those remaining after all applications for main distribution seeds have been met. Please see the notes on the back of the order form for futher information. On-line ordering will again be offered this year. You will be able to view the seed list, make your selections, order and pay for your seed order on line. We will take care to ensure parity between on line ordering and postal ordering so neither system will get priority. Please go to http://www.alpinegardensociety.net/seed/exchange/ and follow the instructions on the page. Overseas Members: Members outside the UK and the EU are reminded that most countries restrict the import of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Species of Shield-Head Vipers in the Caucasus
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2016. 1 (3): 11–25 RARE SPECIES OF SHIELD-HEAD VIPERS IN THE CAUCASUS Boris S. Tuniyev Sochi National Park, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 03.10.2016 An overview is presented on shield-head vipers of the genus Pelias distributed in the post-Soviet countries of the Caucasian Ecoregion. The assessment presents the current conservation status and recommendations to vipers’ ter- ritorial protection. Key words: Caucasian Ecoregion, shield-head vipers, current status, protection. Introduction The Caucasian Ecoregion (the territory south- to-landscape descriptions (Tunieyv B.S. et al., 2009; ward from the Kuma-Manych depression to north- Tuniyev S.B. et al., 2012, 2014). The stationary works eastern Turkey and northwestern Iran) is the centre (mostly on the territory of the Caucasian State Nature of taxonomic diversity of shield-head vipers within Biosphere reserve and Sochi National Park) conducted the genus Pelias Merrem, 1820, of which 13–18 a study of the microclimatic features of vipers’ habitats species are found here. Without exception, all spe- including temperature and humidity modes of air and cies have a status of the different categories of rare- the upper soil horizon. The results were compared with ness, they are included on the IUCN Red list, or in thermobiological characteristics of the animals (Tuni- the current and upcoming publication of National yev B.S. & Unanian, 1986; Tuniyev B.S. & Volčik, and Regional Red Data Books. Besides the shield- 1995). In a number of cases difficult to determine the head vipers the Caucasian Ecoregion inhabit three taxonomic affiliation, in addition to the classical meth- representatives of mountain vipers of the genus ods of animal morphology and statistics, biochemistry Montivipera Nilson, Tuniyev, Andren, Orlov, Joger and molecular-genetic analysis methods have been ap- & Herrman, 1999 (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Document
    Cyclamen Notes by Wilhelm (Bill) Bischoff Flowers of Atlantis? Page 2 Cyclamen Blooming Times Page 4 Cyclamen Species, Subspecies, Page 5 Forma, & Varieties in Alphabetical Order Cyclamen Descriptions Page 6 (photos referenced are not included) Wilhelm (Bill) Bischoff is available for lectures & garden tours for Cyclamen & Hardy Orchids 604-589-6134 wbischoff @ shaw.ca The Flowers of Atlantis? By Wilhelm (Bill) Bischoff / member BC Council of Garden Clubs If you can accept that the island called Santorini in the central Mediterranean, also known as Thira / Tera, is the original Island of Atlantis; if you also can agree that this Island had a terrific volcanic explosion more than 3,000 years ago, than I can share with you an equally fantastic botanical story with you. That today’s Thira is the remnant of an exploded volcano is quite evident when one looks at a map of this region of the Mediterranean. Located as part of the Aegean Islands, just north of Crete, it shows the unmistakable shape of a water filled volcanic caldera with a center-cone island. Scientists have identified volcanic ash taken from the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, close to the Lebanese coast, as originating from Thira. The time frame of some 3300 years ago also coincides with the beginning of a rather tumultuous time in this part of the ancient world, the end of the “Bronze Age”. The possible cause of that could well have been a natural disaster, in the very heart of the ancient world as we know it. Now that I have your attention and possibly have whetted your curiosity, let me introduce you to one of the small wonders of this very ancient world, the beautiful Cyclamen, all 22 species of them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of GIS and Modelling Approaches in Squirrel Population Management and Conservation: a Review
    SPECIAL SECTION: ARBOREAL SQUIRRELS The use of GIS and modelling approaches in squirrel population management and conservation: a review P. W. W. Lurz1,*, J. L. Koprowski2 and D. J. A. Wood2 1School of Biology and Psychology, IRES, Devonshire Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK 2Wildlife Conservation and Management, School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721, USA We review modelling approaches in relation to three cosmopolitan distribution. Squirrels are managed as game key areas of sciurid ecology: management, disease risk or fur-bearers that provide considerable subsistence and 5 6 assessments and conservation. Models enable us to ex- economic value , especially in Holarctic species . Tree plore different scenarios to develop effective manage- squirrels are also viewed as pests in many regions, attack- ment and conservation strategies. They may also assist ing crops, trees and electrical systems or competing with in identifying and targeting research needs for tree native species6–8. Modelling in a natural resources man- and flying squirrels. However, there is a need to refine agement context has usually focused on habitat-based techniques and assure that data used are applicable at methods and harvest dynamics. the appropriate scale. Models allow managers to make Habitat-based models have been applied to two common informed decisions to help conserve species, but suc- species of North America, eastern fox squirrels (S. niger) cess requires that the utility of the tool be evaluated as 9–11 new empirical data become available and models re- and eastern grey squirrels . Models identify habitat in fined to more accurately meet the needs of current terms of two relatively simple components: winter food conservation scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoacanthocephalus
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Smales, Lesley R and Allain, Steven J. R. and Wilkinson, John W. and Harris, Eileen (2020) A new species of Pseudoacanthocephalus (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) from the guttural toad, Sclerophrys gutturalis (Bufonidae), introduced into Mauritius, with comments on the implications of the introductions of toads and their parasites into the UK. Journal of Helminthology, 94 . DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/80268/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Journal of Helminthology A new species of Pseudoacanthocephalus (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) from cambridge.org/jhl the guttural toad, Sclerophrys gutturalis (Bufonidae), introduced into Mauritius, Research Paper with comments on the implications of the Cite this article: Smales LR, Allain SJR, Wilkinson JW, Harris E (2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment – Part 6 Project Number: 47919 April 2014 GEO: Adjaristsqali Hydropower Project Prepared by Mott MacDonald and Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC for the Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Biodiversity Action Plan Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Biodiversity290039 EVT Action EMS 01Plan A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1516754514 1 November 2012 Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC 1. Abashidze Street 6, 6010 Batumi, Georgia Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom t +44 (0)1223 463500 f +44 (0)1223 461007, www.mottmac.com Biodiversity Action Plan Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 2/11/2012 Celia Figueira Vanessa Hovland Caroline McParland Draft for client review Mihai Coroi Tristan Folland Róisín Ní Mhathúna B 29/11/2012 Mihai Coroi Vanessa Hovland Final Draft
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasian Toad, Bufo Verrucosissimus (Pallas, 1814) in the Levant: Evidence from Mitochondrial DNA
    Herpetozoa 32: 255–258 (2019) DOI 10.3897/herpetozoa.32.e37560 The Caucasian Toad, Bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas, 1814) in the Levant: evidence from mitochondrial DNA Daniel Jablonski1, Riyad A. Sadek2 1 Department of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, Mlynská dolina, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia 2 Department of Biology, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, 1107 2020, Beirut, Lebanon http://zoobank.org/017F0D1F-7467-43A9-9D7C-46335D293038 Corresponding author: Daniel Jablonski ([email protected]) Academic editor: Günter Gollmann ♦ Received 20 June 2019 ♦ Accepted 5 October 2019 ♦ Published 29 October 2019 Abstract We present the first molecular analysis of the Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) complex population in the Levant. This complex contains four species distributed through the Western Palearctic. Based on the analysis of the widely used mitochondrial marker 16S rRNA, populations from the Levant belong to B. verrucosissimus (Pallas, 1814) and have a close affiliation to populations from the Trans- caucasian region rather than southern Turkey. Such identified relationships may imply past rapid colonisation from north to south and support the need for further research. Key Words common toad, Bufonidae, mtDNA, biogeography, taxonomy, Middle East The Caucasian Toad, Bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas, western and southern Turkey (García-Porta et al. 2012; 1814), is a member of the Western Palearctic B. bufo (Lin- Arntzen et al. 2013). naeus, 1758) complex along with three other species: B. Although information about B. bufo complex in the bufo, B. eichwaldi and B. spinosus (García-Porta et al. Levant region (Syria, Lebanon) is absent in recent phylo- 2012; Recuero et al. 2012; Arntzen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Caucasus Glacier Inventory (Russia/Georgia/Azerbaijan) Levan G
    The Greater Caucasus Glacier Inventory (Russia/Georgia/Azerbaijan) Levan G. Tielidze1,3, Roger D. Wheate2 1Department of Geomorphology, Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi 5 State University, 6 Tamarashvili st., Tbilisi, Georgia, 0177 2Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, Canada, V2N 4Z9 3Department of Earth Sciences, Georgian National Academy of Sciences, 52 Rustaveli Ave., Tbilisi, Georgia, 0108 10 Correspondence to: Levan G. Tielidze ([email protected]) Abstract There have been numerous studies of glaciers in the Greater Caucasus, but none that have generated a 15 modern glacier database across the whole range. Here, we present an updated and expanded glacier inventory over the three 1960-1986-2014 time periods covering the entire Greater Caucasus. Large scale topographic maps and satellite imagery (Corona, Landsat 5, Landsat 8 and ASTER) were used to conduct a remote sensing survey of glacier change and the 30 m resolution ASTER GDEM to determine the aspect and height distribution of glaciers. Glacier margins were mapped manually and reveal that, in 20 1960, the mountains contained 2349 glaciers, with a total glacier surface area of 1674.9±70.4 km2. By 1986, glacier surface area had decreased to 1482.1±64.4 km2 (2209 glaciers), and by 2014, to 1193.2±54.0 km2 (2020 glaciers). This represents a 28.8±4.4% (481±21.2 km2) or 0.53% yr-1 reduction in total glacier surface area between 1960 and 2014 and an increase in the rate of area loss since 1986 (0.69% yr-1), compared to 1960-1986 (0.44% yr-1).
    [Show full text]