DOCSLIB.ORG

Fisheries-Stocks 2005 Update REVISION For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fisheries-Stocks 2005 Update REVISION For 7/20/05 Update No. of Years Below Certification Regulations and Management Assessment TRP Date Current TRP, Years not Unit Fishery Plans Species Stocks Fishery Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point Implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Years Below 2004 Escape Notes estimated TRP Citation 5 AAC 09.100- Alaska Peninsula .355 Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Net N. Ak. Pen. 5 AAC 09.369 Northern District Salmon FMP Sockeye Bristol Bay River Systems Interception Northern District Sockeye Cinder River Incidental AS SEG Avg. Esc./ rear habitat 6 to 12 thousand late 1980s 1994 1 02 55,050 93, 96, 01 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Spawning habitat Sockeye Ilnik River Directed Weir,AS SEG capacity 40 to 60 thousand 1991 1 95 82,000 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye Meshik River Directed AS SEG Avg. Esc. 10 to 20 thousand late 1980s 0 82,200 93, 97 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye Sandy River Directed Weir,AS SEG Avg. Esc. 40 to 60 thousand 1994 1 97 32,000 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye Bear River Early Run Directed Weir SEG spawning area 211 to 353 thousand late 1960s 2004, Raised 0 354,555 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Bear River Late Run Directed Weir SEG spawning area 81 to 135 thousand late 1960s 2004, Raised 0 80,445 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Nelson River Directed Weir SEG Stock Recruit 97 to 219 thousand 1979 2004, changed to BEG, range broadened 0 480,097 Nelson et al 2004 Chinook Nelson River Directed Weir BEG Habitat Model 2.4 to 4.4 thousand 1993 2004, Changed to BEG & Lowered 1 95 6,959 Nelson et al 2004 Chum Northern District Index (44 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 119.6 to 239.2 thousand 1992 2004, changed to BEG (no change to goal) 0 139,350 Nelson et al 2004 Coho Nelson River Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis >18 thousand early 1980s 2004, Threshold at Lower End of old Goal 1 99 52,500 Nelson et al 2004 N. Ak. Pen. Sockeye Christianson Lagoon Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 25 to 50 thousand 1980s 0 75,400 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Northwest Sockeye Swanson Lagoon Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 8 to 16 thousand 1990 4 97-00 24,300 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye North Creek Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 4.4 to 8.8 thousand late 1980s 1 95 15,000 Pink Northwestern District Index (5 systems) odd year Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis 1.6 thousand threshold 1992 2004, lower escapement threshold 1 03 Nelson et al 2004 Pink Northwestern District Index (5 systems) even year Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis 31 thousand threshold 1992 2004, lower escapement threshold 1 02 84300 Nelson et al 2004 Chum Northwestern District Index (25 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 100 to 215 thousand 1992 2004, changed to BEG (lowered) 0 295,600 Nelson et al 2004 South Unimak 5 AAC 09.365 South Unimak and Shumagin Sockeye Bristol Bay River Systems Interception and Shumagins Islands June Fishery FMP Sockeye North Alaska Peninsula River Systems Incidental Sockeye Chignik River Interception Chum North Alaska Peninsula River Systems Incidental Chum Bristol Bay River Systems Interception Chum Kuskokwim River Interception Chum Yukon River Interception Chum Norton Sound River Systems Interception Chum Russian River Systems Interception Chum Japanese Hatchery Interception Chum South Alaska Peninsula River Systems Incidental Southeastern 5 AAC 09.360 Southeastern District Mainland Sockeye Chignik River Early Run Interception District Mainland Salmon Management Plan Sockeye Chignik River Late Run Interception Avg. Esc/ Sockeye Orzinski Lake Directed Weir SEG spawning/rearing habitat 15 to 20 thousand 1980 0 75,450 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 5 AAC 09.366 Pink Southeastern District Index (72 systems) all years Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 562.6 to 1,125.3 thousan 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 2.85 million Nelson et al 2004 South Alaska Peninsula Post- Post-June Salmon Management June Fisheries Plan for South Alaska Peninsula Pink South Central District Index (16 systems) all years Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 687.2 to 1,374.4 thousan 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 3.12 million Nelson et al 2004 Pink Southwestern District Index (45 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 378 to 756 thousand 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 Nelson et al 2004 Pink Southwestern District Index (45 systems) even year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 563.6 to 1,127.2 thousan 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 2.29 million Nelson et al 2004 Pink Unimak District Index (10 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 10 to 20 thousand 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 1 01 1993 Nelson et al 2004 Pink Unimak District Index (10 systems) even year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 51.2 to 102.4 thousand 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 4 96,98,00,02 30,600 1/ Nelson et al 2004 Pink Area wide even-year (143 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 1.8646 to 3,7293 million 2004 0 8.31 million Nelson et al 2004 Pink Area wide odd-year (143 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 1.638 to 3.276 million 2004 0 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum Southeastern District -Mainland,Shumagin (28 streamsDirected AS SEG capacity 106.4 to 212.8 thousand 1992 2 94,99 339,200 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum South Central District Index (13 streams) Directed AS SEG capacity 89.8 to 179.6 thousand 1992 2 00,03 184,800 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum Southwestern District Index (23 streams) Directed AS SEG capacity 133.4 to 266.8 thousand 1992 0 180,000 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum Unimak District Index (3 streams) Directed AS SEG capacity 800 to 1.6 thousand 1992 4 95,98,01,03 400 1/ Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Orzinski Lake AS SEG 15 to 20 thousand 1980 0 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Mortensens Lagoon Directed AS SEG Lake Productivity 3.2 to 6.4 thousand late 1980s 1 96 7,211 Nelson et al 2004 No. of Years Below Certification Regulations and Management Assessment TRP Date Current TRP, Years not Unit Fishery Plans Species Stocks Fishery Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point Implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Years Below 2004 Escape Notes estimated TRP Citation Spawning habitat Sockeye Thin Point Lake Directed AS SEG capacity 14 to 28 thousand late 1980s 3 96-7,00 34,500 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Middle Lagoon Directed AS SEG 16 to 32 tbousand late 1980s 2 96,00 34,400 Nelson et al 2004 Coho Thin Point Lake Directed AS SEG threshold 3 thousand threshold 1992 2004, Threshold at Lower End of old Goal 0 9,600 Nelson et al 2004 5 AAC 15.100- Chignik .355 Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Chinook Chignik River Incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 1.3 to 2.7 thousand 1992 1994, 2002 0 7,840 Hasbrouk and Clark In press Seine 5 AAC 15.357 Chignik Area Salmon ManagementSockeye Chignik River Early Run directed Weir SEG Stock Recruit 350 to 400 thousand 1969 Changed from BEG to SEG in 04; same goal 0 363,800 Witteveen et al 2004 5 AAC 15.359 Sockeye Chignik River Late Run directed Weir SEG Stock Recruit 200 to 250 thousand 1969 Changed from BEG to SEG in 04; same goal 1 214,459 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Entire Chignik Area (49 systems)-odd year directed/incidentaAS BEG Stock Recruit 541 to 1,177 thousand 1999 Prior combined district SEG was 779,500 1 99 Witteveen et al 2004 Chignik Area Cooperative Purse Pink Entire Chignik Area (49 systems)-even year directed/incidentaAS BEG Stock Recruit 327 to 737 thousand 1999 Prior combined district SEG was 779,500 0 1,114,860 Witteveen et al 2004 Seine Salmon Fishery Management Plan Pink Chignik Bay District Index (3 streams)-odd year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 8 to 17 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 2 97,99 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Chignik Bay District Index (3 streams)-even year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 3 to 7 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 1 98 27,300 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Central District Index (8 streams)-odd year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 87 to 190 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 1 99 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Central District Index (8 streams)-even year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 62 to 140 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 257,000 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Eastern District Index (23 streams)-odd year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 276 to 601 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Eastern District Index (23 streams)-even year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 186 to 418 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 601,900 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Western District Index (6 streams)-odd year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 65 to 141 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 93-98 Witteveen et al 2004 Pink Western District Index (6 streams)-even year directed AS Man.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska Department of Fish and Game Staff Comments on Subsistence, Personal Use, Sport, Guided Sport, and Commercial Finfish Regu
    ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME STAFF COMMENTS ON SUBSISTENCE, PERSONAL USE, SPORT, GUIDED SPORT, AND COMMERCIAL FINFISH REGULATORY PROPOSALS FOR THE ARCTIC-YUKON-KUSKOKWIM AREA FINFISH ALASKA BOARD OF FISHERIES MEETING FAIRBANKS, ALASKA JANUARY 12-19 , 2004 The following staff comments were prepared by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for use at the Alaska Board of Fisheries (Board) meeting, January 12-19, 2004 in Fairbanks, Alaska. The comments are forwarded to assist the public and Board. The comments contained herein should be considered preliminary and subject to change, as new information becomes available. Final department positions will be formulated after review of written and oral public testimony presented to the Board. This book is organized by Board Subcommittee. A listing of staff comment page numbers by proposal number appears after the Table of Contents on page vi. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire further information, please write to ADF&G, P.O. Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4040 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Katmai National Park and Preserve (Alaska)
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resources Program Center Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Katmai National Park and Preserve (Alaska) Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR—2007/372 Cover photo: Glacier emerging from the slopes of Mt Douglas toward the Katmai coastline. August 2005. Photo: S.Nagorski 2 Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Katmai National Park and Preserve (Alaska) Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2007/372 Sonia Nagorski Environmental Science Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 Ginny Eckert Biology Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 Eran Hood Environmental Science Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 Sanjay Pyare Environmental Science Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 This report was prepared under Task Order J9W88050014 of the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (agreement CA90880008) Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 June 2007 U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 3 The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • 25. Recreation
    Recreation—Bristol Bay Drainages 25. RECREATION 25.1 Introduction The recreation study inventoried, described, quantified, and mapped the outdoor recreational resources and activities in the Bristol Bay drainages study areas (Figure 25-1). The study objectives were as follows: • Describe the location, use, and management status of important recreational resources in the study areas. • Describe, quantify, and map the location of recreational activities. • Estimate the economic contribution of recreation to the economy in the study areas. A regional study area and a central study area were defined in the Bristol Bay drainages for the recreation baseline study (Figure 25-1). The regional study area comprises three overlapping study areas: land use, big game hunting, and sportfishing. The regional study area was flexibly defined to fit the geographic databases for different recreational resources, activities, and management regimes. The central study area encompasses the local drainage areas in the immediate vicinity of the Pebble Deposit and along the northeastern extent of Iliamna Lake (the central study area coincides with the mine study area, transportation-corridor study area, and Iliamna Lake study area depicted on Figure 1-4 in Chapter 1). The study area boundaries for land use, big game hunting, and sportfishing were defined as follows: • The land use study area encompasses about 22,526 square miles. Its boundary is based on the State of Alaska’s 2005 Bristol Bay Area Plan for State Lands (ADNR, 2005a) and Nushagak and Mulchatna Rivers Recreation Management Plan (ADNR, 2005b), and the boundaries of the Katmai and Lake Clark national parks and preserves. • The sportfishing study area encompasses an estimated 26,233 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Watershed Database for National Parks in Southwestern Alaska and a System for Further Watershed-Based Analysis
    A Watershed Database for National Parks in Southwestern Alaska and a System for Further Watershed-based Analysis David M. Mixon 2005 Introduction This document describes a project designed to delineate and quantitatively describe watersheds located within or flowing into or out of national park lands in the National Inventory and Monitoring program’s Southwest Alaskan Network (SWAN) of parks. The parks included in this study are Aniakchak National Monument & Preserve, Katmai National Park & Preserve, Lake Clark National Park & Preserve, and Kenai Fjords National Park. This effort was undertaken to support decision-making processes related to the Inventory and Monitoring program’s goals. A variety of environmental and physical attributes were collected for each watershed using remotely sensed data in the form of a geographic information system (GIS). The GIS data used is from a variety of sources with variable quality. The nature of GIS analysis is such that many times a newer, higher-resolution dataset may become available during the course of any given study. For this reason, a set of scripts and methods are provided, making the incorporation of newer datasets as easy as possible. The goal is to provide an initial analysis of park hydrology as well as a means for updating the database with a minimal amount of effort. It was necessary to choose a watershed size (stream order) that would provide sufficient detail for each park and allow useful comparison of basins within the parks while minimizing the complexity of the study. Review of standards for hydrologic unit delineation being used for the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) (FGDC, 2002), suggested that the officially designated level 5 watersheds would provide the level of detail desired while minimizing redundancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Yukon Management Area, 2012
    Fishery Management Report No. 14-31 Fishery Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Yukon Management Area, 2012 by John Burr June 2014 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co. expected value E nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Subsistence Bibliography Volume V Western & Southwestern
    REGIONAL SUBSISTENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Volume V Western & Southwestern Alaska Number I BY David B. Andersen and Jan H. Overturf Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Technical Paper No. 111 Juneau. Alaska 1986 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................ .v Introduction ............................................... ..vi i . Abbreviations .............................................. ..Xl x Bibliographic citations .................................... ..l Keyword Index ................................................ 169 Author Index ................................................ 199 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have contributed time and reference material to help produce this publication. Reference collection work done in 1983 was was greatly assisted by Elizabeth Andrews, Steve Rehnke, John Wright, and Dr. Robert Wolfe who made their own collections of regional references available and offered useful suggestions regarding organiza- tion of the bibliography and additional sources. References collected in 1983 sat for over two years awaiting further work and funding, and. for a time it appeared that they would never make it into print. We have Jim Fall to thank for spearheading efforts to resurrect the project in 1986, offering suggestions for updating the collection with new material, reviewing citations and introductory text, and providing the funds for printing. Others contributing additional reference material to the updated collection include Elizaheth Andrews. Susan Georgette, Judy Morris. and Janet Schichnes. Thanks also to Dan Foster, who expertly prepared the maps appearing in the introduction. to Kathy Arndt, who painstakingly edited an early rough draft of the hihliography. and to Margie Yadlosky, who efficiently handled data entry and editing tasks on the data file. Cover artwork was the creation of Tim Sczawinski. Finally. special thanks go to Louis Brown for his programming wizardry which created the microcomputer version of the data base and the indexing routines.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Update for the Week of June 17-23, 2018
    FISHERIES UPDATE June 17-June 23, 2018 Report 4 FISHERIES UPDATE FOR THE WEEK OF JUNE 17- 23, 2018. Report #4 Compiled by George Pappas - (907) 786-3822, [email protected] Office of Subsistence Management, USFWS. The purpose of the weekly fisheries update is to provide the reader with an overall summary of the status of subsistence related fisheries throughout the state of Alaska. The target audience is the Federal Subsistence Board and its Staff Committee. The report was compiled with the assistance of the Federal in-season managers and OSM staff that provided weekly updated information by the close of business on Friday of the reporting week. My goal is to have the report sent by the close of business the following Monday. Web links have been included to provide additional information. You may obtain additional information on a fishery of particular interest by contacting the in-season manager, provided contacts, follow the provided web links, or contact me. SOUTHEAST ALASKA Sitka and Hoonah Area – Justin Koller, Forest Service, Tongass National Forest Justin Koller, (907)747-4297 [email protected] Falls Lake Sockeye Salmon - The Forest Service and the Organized Village of Kake operate the Falls Lake trap and video net weir which will be operational the first week of July. The final escapement estimate in 2017 was 4,662 Sockeye Salmon while the final subsistence and sport harvest in the marine terminal area was 732. Subsistence harvest accounted for 89% of terminal area harvest. 1 FISHERIES UPDATE June 17-June 23, 2018 Report 4 Figure 1. Aerial photo of the Falls Lake outlet illustrating the typical location of weir equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps
    The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps The National Park Service United States Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20240 January 1982 III. Existing Components of the National System 1981 National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Components State Alaska 1 _ ** River Name County(s)* Segment Reach Agency Contact Description (mile1s) (s) Designation State Congressional Section(s) Length Date of District(s) Managing Physiographic Agency Alagnak River including AK I&W The Alagnak from 67 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Nonvianuk Kukaklek Lake to West 540 West 5th Avenue boundary of T13S, R43W Anchorage, AK 99501 and the entire Nonvianuk River. Alntna River AK B.R. The main stem within the 83 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Gates of the Arctic 540 West 5th Avenue National Park and Preserve. Anchorage, AK 99501 Andreafsky River and AK I614- Segment from its source, 262 12/2/80 FWS Fish and Wildlife Service East Fork including all headwaters 1011 E. Tudor and the East Fork, within Anchorage, AK 99503 the boundary of the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. AK All of the river 69 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Aniakchak River P.M. including its major 540 West 5th Avenue including: Hidden Creek tributaries, Hidden Creek, Anchorage, AK 99501 Mystery Creek, Albert Mystery Creek, Albert Johnson Creek, North Fork Johnson Creek, and North Aniakchak River Fork Aniakchak River, within the Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve. *Alaska is organized by boroughs. If a river is in or partially in a borough, it is noted.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Draft Fisheries Monitoring Plan
    2014 Draft Fisheries Monitoring Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 Continuation Projects in 2014 ................................................................................................. 7 Technical Review Committee Membership .............................................................................. 8 Technical Review Committee, Regional Advisory Council, and Interagency Staff Committee Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 9 Summary of Regional Advisory Council Recommendations and Rationale .............................. 15 NORTHERN REGION OVERVIEW .................................................................................... 19 14-101 - Unalakleet River Chinook Salmon Assessment Continuation .................................... 25 14-102 - Climate change and subsistence fisheries: quantifying the direct effects of climatic warming on arctic fishes and lake ecosystems using whole-lake manipulations on the Alaska North Slope ........................................................................................................................... 27 14-103 - Dispersal patterns and summer ocean distribution of adult Dolly Varden in the Beaufort Sea using satellite telemetry ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Region, 1987
    Fishery Management Report No. 91-1 Annual Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Region, 1987 William D. Arvey, Michael J. Kramer, Jerome E. Hallberg, James F. Parker, and Alfred L. DeCicco April 1991 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish FISHERY MANAGEMENT REPORT NO. 91-1 ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR SPORT FISHERIES IN THE ARCTIC-YUKON-KUSKOKWIM REGION, 1987l William D. Arvey, Michael J. Kramer, Jerome E. Hallberg, James F. Parker, and Alfred L. DeCicco Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Anchorage, Alaska April 1991 Some of the data included in this report were collected under various jobs of project F-10-3 of the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K). TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES............................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES.............................................. V LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................... vii ABSTRACT ..................................................... 1 PREFACE...................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................. 3 TANANA AREA DESCRIPTION ...................................... 3 Geographic and Geologic Setting ......................... 3 Lake and Stream Development ............................. 10 Climate................................................. 13 Primary Species for Sport Fishing ....................... 13 Status and Harvest Trends of Wild Stocks ................ 13 Chinook Salmon ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4333–15–P DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Forest Service 36 CFR Part 242 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildli
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/23/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-22733, and on govinfo.gov 3411–15–P; 4333–15–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service 36 CFR Part 242 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 100 [Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2018–0015; FXRS12610700000–201–FF07J00000; FBMS#4500145506] RIN 1018–BD11 Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska—2020–21 and 2021–22 Subsistence Taking of Wildlife Regulations AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This final rule establishes regulations for seasons, harvest limits, and methods and means related to the taking of wildlife for subsistence uses in Alaska for the 2020–21 and 2021–22 regulatory years. The Federal Subsistence Board (Board) completes the biennial process of revising subsistence hunting and trapping regulations in even-numbered years and subsistence fishing and shellfish regulations in odd-numbered years; public proposal and review processes take place during the preceding year. The Board also addresses customary and traditional use determinations during the applicable biennial cycle. This rule also revises the customary and traditional use determinations for wildlife. DATES: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: The comments received on the proposed rule as well as the Board meeting transcripts are available at www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2018–0015. Board meeting transcripts are also available for review at the Office of Subsistence Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, Mail Stop 121, Anchorage, AK 99503, or on the Office of Subsistence Management website (https://www.doi.gov/subsistence).
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Water Temperatures Associated with Federal Subsistence Fisheries in Alaska— Winter 2014 to Fall 2015
    Stream Water Temperatures Associated with Federal Subsistence Fisheries in Alaska— Winter 2014 to Fall 2015 Prepared For the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Subsistence Management Leslie R. Jensen, Jeffrey C. Davis, and Gay A. Davis The Aquatic Restoration and Research Institute P.O. Box 923, Talkeetna AK, 99676 [email protected] 907.315‐4631 February 2016 Blank Page Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Project Design ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Implementation ............................................................................................................................ 5 Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 6 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. Data Summaries for Sampling Locations
    [Show full text]