sign in sign up
<<
Home , Alagnak River, Andreafsky River

7/20/05 Update No. of Years Below Certification Regulations and Management Assessment TRP Date Current TRP, Years not Unit Fishery Plans Species Stocks Fishery Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point Implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Years Below 2004 Escape Notes estimated TRP Citation 5 AAC 09.100- Peninsula .355 Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Net N. Ak. Pen. 5 AAC 09.369 Northern District FMP Sockeye River Systems Interception Northern District Sockeye Cinder River Incidental AS SEG Avg. Esc./ rear habitat 6 to 12 thousand late 1980s 1994 1 02 55,050 93, 96, 01 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Spawning habitat Sockeye Ilnik River Directed Weir,AS SEG capacity 40 to 60 thousand 1991 1 95 82,000 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye Meshik River Directed AS SEG Avg. Esc. 10 to 20 thousand late 1980s 0 82,200 93, 97 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye Sandy River Directed Weir,AS SEG Avg. Esc. 40 to 60 thousand 1994 1 97 32,000 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye Bear River Early Run Directed Weir SEG spawning area 211 to 353 thousand late 1960s 2004, Raised 0 354,555 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Bear River Late Run Directed Weir SEG spawning area 81 to 135 thousand late 1960s 2004, Raised 0 80,445 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Nelson River Directed Weir SEG Stock Recruit 97 to 219 thousand 1979 2004, changed to BEG, range broadened 0 480,097 Nelson et al 2004 Chinook Nelson River Directed Weir BEG Habitat Model 2.4 to 4.4 thousand 1993 2004, Changed to BEG & Lowered 1 95 6,959 Nelson et al 2004 Chum Northern District Index (44 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 119.6 to 239.2 thousand 1992 2004, changed to BEG (no change to goal) 0 139,350 Nelson et al 2004 Coho Nelson River Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis >18 thousand early 1980s 2004, Threshold at Lower End of old Goal 1 99 52,500 Nelson et al 2004

N. Ak. Pen. Sockeye Christianson Lagoon Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 25 to 50 thousand 1980s 0 75,400 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Northwest Sockeye Swanson Lagoon Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 8 to 16 thousand 1990 4 97-00 24,300 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Sockeye North Creek Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 4.4 to 8.8 thousand late 1980s 1 95 15,000 Pink Northwestern District Index (5 systems) odd year Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis 1.6 thousand threshold 1992 2004, lower escapement threshold 1 03 Nelson et al 2004 Pink Northwestern District Index (5 systems) even year Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis 31 thousand threshold 1992 2004, lower escapement threshold 1 02 84300 Nelson et al 2004 Chum Northwestern District Index (25 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 100 to 215 thousand 1992 2004, changed to BEG (lowered) 0 295,600 Nelson et al 2004

South Unimak 5 AAC 09.365 South Unimak and Shumagin Sockeye Bristol Bay River Systems Interception and Shumagins Islands June Fishery FMP Sockeye North River Systems Incidental Sockeye Chignik River Interception Chum North Alaska Peninsula River Systems Incidental Chum Bristol Bay River Systems Interception Chum Kuskokwim River Interception Chum Interception Chum Norton Sound River Systems Interception Chum Russian River Systems Interception Chum Japanese Hatchery Interception Chum South Alaska Peninsula River Systems Incidental

Southeastern 5 AAC 09.360 Southeastern District Mainland Sockeye Chignik River Early Run Interception District Mainland Salmon Management Plan Sockeye Chignik River Late Run Interception

Avg. Esc/ Sockeye Orzinski Lake Directed Weir SEG spawning/rearing habitat 15 to 20 thousand 1980 0 75,450 Nelson and Lloyd 2001

5 AAC 09.366 Pink Southeastern District Index (72 systems) all years Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 562.6 to 1,125.3 thousan 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 2.85 million Nelson et al 2004 South Alaska Peninsula Post- Post-June Salmon Management June Fisheries Plan for South Alaska Peninsula Pink South Central District Index (16 systems) all years Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 687.2 to 1,374.4 thousan 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 3.12 million Nelson et al 2004

Pink Southwestern District Index (45 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 378 to 756 thousand 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 Nelson et al 2004

Pink Southwestern District Index (45 systems) even year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 563.6 to 1,127.2 thousan 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 0 2.29 million Nelson et al 2004

Pink Unimak District Index (10 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 10 to 20 thousand 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 1 01 1993 Nelson et al 2004

Pink Unimak District Index (10 systems) even year Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 51.2 to 102.4 thousand 1992 2004, changed to M.O. from SEG 4 96,98,00,02 30,600 1/ Nelson et al 2004 Pink Area wide even-year (143 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 1.8646 to 3,7293 million 2004 0 8.31 million Nelson et al 2004 Pink Area wide odd-year (143 streams) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 1.638 to 3.276 million 2004 0 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum Southeastern District -Mainland,Shumagin (28 streamsDirected AS SEG capacity 106.4 to 212.8 thousand 1992 2 94,99 339,200 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum South Central District Index (13 streams) Directed AS SEG capacity 89.8 to 179.6 thousand 1992 2 00,03 184,800 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum Southwestern District Index (23 streams) Directed AS SEG capacity 133.4 to 266.8 thousand 1992 0 180,000 Nelson et al 2004 Avg. Esc./spawn Chum Unimak District Index (3 streams) Directed AS SEG capacity 800 to 1.6 thousand 1992 4 95,98,01,03 400 1/ Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Orzinski Lake AS SEG 15 to 20 thousand 1980 0 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Mortensens Lagoon Directed AS SEG Lake Productivity 3.2 to 6.4 thousand late 1980s 1 96 7,211 Nelson et al 2004 No. of Years Below Certification Regulations and Management Assessment TRP Date Current TRP, Years not Unit Fishery Plans Species Stocks Fishery Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point Implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Years Below 2004 Escape Notes estimated TRP Citation Spawning habitat Sockeye Thin Point Lake Directed AS SEG capacity 14 to 28 thousand late 1980s 3 96-7,00 34,500 Nelson et al 2004 Sockeye Middle Lagoon Directed AS SEG 16 to 32 tbousand late 1980s 2 96,00 34,400 Nelson et al 2004 Coho Thin Point Lake Directed AS SEG threshold 3 thousand threshold 1992 2004, Threshold at Lower End of old Goal 0 9,600 Nelson et al 2004

5 AAC 15.100- Chignik .355 Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Chinook Chignik River Incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 1.3 to 2.7 thousand 1992 1994, 2002 0 7,840 Hasbrouk and Clark In press Seine 5 AAC 15.357 Chignik Area Salmon ManagementSockeye Chignik River Early Run directed Weir SEG Stock Recruit 350 to 400 thousand 1969 Changed from BEG to SEG in 04; same goal 0 363,800 Witteveen et al 2004 5 AAC 15.359 Sockeye Chignik River Late Run directed Weir SEG Stock Recruit 200 to 250 thousand 1969 Changed from BEG to SEG in 04; same goal 1 214,459 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Entire Chignik Area (49 systems)-odd year directed/incidentaAS BEG Stock Recruit 541 to 1,177 thousand 1999 Prior combined district SEG was 779,500 1 99 Witteveen et al 2004 Chignik Area Cooperative Purse Pink Entire Chignik Area (49 systems)-even year directed/incidentaAS BEG Stock Recruit 327 to 737 thousand 1999 Prior combined district SEG was 779,500 0 1,114,860 Witteveen et al 2004 Seine Salmon Fishery Management Plan Pink Chignik Bay District Index (3 streams)-odd year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 8 to 17 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 2 97,99 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Chignik Bay District Index (3 streams)-even year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 3 to 7 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 1 98 27,300 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Central District Index (8 streams)-odd year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 87 to 190 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 1 99 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Central District Index (8 streams)-even year Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 62 to 140 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 257,000 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Eastern District Index (23 streams)-odd year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 276 to 601 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Eastern District Index (23 streams)-even year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 186 to 418 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 601,900 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Western District Index (6 streams)-odd year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 65 to 141 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 93-98 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Western District Index (6 streams)-even year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 31 to 69 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 94,340 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Perryville District Index (9 streams)-odd yeat directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 105 to 228 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 2 99,01 93-98 Witteveen et al 2004

Pink Perryville District Index (9 streams)-even year directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG 45 to 102 thousand 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 134,320 Witteveen et al 2004

Chum Entire Chignik Area (42 streams) Primarily IncidenAS SEG Risk Analysis, threshold >50,400 1999 2004 (changed to threshold & lowered) 0 349,518 Witteveen et al 2004

Chum Chignik Bay District Index (3 streams) Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition SEG >200 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 1 99 376 98,2000-02 Witteveen et al 2004

Chum Central District Index (6 streams) Incidental AS Man. Obj. Partition SEG >6,700 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 2 01,02 30,310 93-98 Witteveen et al 2004

Chum Eastern District Index (20 streams) directed AS Man. Obj. Partition SEG >25,200 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 0 277,240 93-98 Witteveen et al 2004

Chum Western District Index (6 streams) directed AS Man. Obj. Partition SEG >5,400 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 3 99-01 3,100 93-98 Witteveen et al 2004

Chum Perryville District Index (7 streams) directed AS Man. Obj. Partition SEG >12,800 1999 Changed to M.O. from SEG in 2004 1 00 38,492 93-98 Witteveen et al 2004

5 AAC 18.100- Kodiak .355 Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Net 5 AAC 18.375 Foul Bay Terminal Harvest Area Sockeye Hatchery Directed 5 AAC 18.376 Waterfall Bay Terminal Harvest ArSockeye Hatchery Directed 5 AAC 18.360 Cape Igvak Salmon Management PSockeye Chignik River Early Run Interception 350 to 400 thousand 1969 Mainland District Sockeye Chignik River Late Run Interception 200 to 250 thousand 1969

5 AAC 18.363 North Shelikof Straight Sockeye Sockeye Cook Inlet River Systems Interception Salmon Management Plan

5 AAC 18.369 Mainland District Salmon ManagemChum Mainland District Index (17 streams) Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis,threshold >153 thousand 1988 2005 (lwr range raised, changed to threshold) 5 95,97-8,02-3 364,395 Nelson et al 2005 Pink Mainland District Index (16 systems) odd year Directed AS SEG Yield Analysis 250 to 750 thousand 1977 79, 81, 83, 85, 88, 2005 (raised) 0 Nelson et al 2005 Pink Mainland District Index (16 systems) even year Directed AS SEG Yield Analysis 250 to 750 thousand 1978 1980, 1988, 2005 (lowered) 0 711,555 Nelson et al 2005 Pink Kodiak Archepelago (34 systems) even & odd yrs Directed AS SEG Yield Analysis 2.0 to 5.0 million 2005 created in 2005 0 8.077 million Nelson et al 2005

Sockeye Cook Inlet River Systems Interception North Shelikof Strait Sockeye Esc %tile Range+ Afognak District 5 AAC 18.363 Salmon Management Plan Sockeye Malina Creek Directed limited Weir SEG zooplankton mdl 1 to 10 thousand 1988 1995 (10 to 20 thousand), 2005 (lowered) 0 20,000 Nelson et al 2005 5 AAC 18.368 North Afognak/Shuyak Island Sockeye Pauls Bay Directed limited Weir SEG Zooplankton model 10 to 30 thousand 1988 2005 (range lowered) 0 29,289 Nelson et al 2005 Salmon Management Plan Sockeye Litnik River (Afognak Lake) Directed limited Weir BEG Stock Recruit 20 to 50 thousand 1988 2005 (changed to BEG & range lowered) 1 02 15,181 Nelson et al 2005 No. of Years Below Certification Regulations and Management Assessment TRP Date Current TRP, Years not Unit Fishery Plans Species Stocks Fishery Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point Implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Years Below 2004 Escape Notes estimated TRP Citation Partition archepelago 5 AAC 18.365 Pink Afognak District Index (8 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 210 to 520 thousand 1977 79, 81, 83, 85, 88, 05 (changed from SEG) 0 Nelson et al 2005 Eastside Afognak Management Partition archepelago Plan (Enhancement) Pink Afognak District Index (8 systems) even year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 180 to 440 thousand 1978 1980, 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 1 266,888 Nelson et al 2005

Partition archepelago 5 AAC 18.362 Westside Kodiak Salmon ManagemPink Northwest Kodiak District Index (9 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 540 to 1,360 thousand 1977 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 0 Nelson et al 2005 Northwest Partition archepelago Kodiak District Pink Northwest Kodiak District Index (9 systems) even yearDirected AS Man. Obj. SEG 420 to 1,060 thousand 1978 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 0 1.16 million Nelson et al 2005 Esc %tile Range, Chum Northwest Kodiak District Index (8 streams) Directed AS SEG threshold >53 thousand 19882005 (lwr range raised & changed to threshold 3 94,98,02 41,200 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Crescent Lake 5 AAC 18.364 Management Plan (Enhancement) Sockeye Hatchery Directed 5 AAC 18.366 Spiradon Lake Sockeye Sockeye Hatchery Directed Management Plan (Enhancement)

Southwest 5 AAC 18.362 Westside Kodiak Salmon ManagemChinook Karluk River incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 3.6 to 7.3 thousand unknown 2002 , range broadened 1 01 7,515 Hasbrouck and Clark In press Kodiak District Chinook Ayakulik River incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 4.8 to 9.6 thousand unknown 2002, range lowered slightly 0 24,830 Hasbrouck and Clark In press Sockeye Karluk River Early Run Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 100 to 210 thousand 1976 78, 83, 88, 92, 2005 (range lowered) 0 389,041 Nelson et al 2005 Sockeye Karluk River Late Run Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 170 to 380 thousand 1976 78, 83, 88, 93, 2005 (range lowered) 0 331,186 Nelson et al 2005 Stock recruit, yield Scckeye Ayakulik River Directed Weir SEG analyses 200 to 500 thousand 1978 1983, 1988, 2005 (upper range increased) 1 03 275,238 Nelson et al 2005 Partition archepelago Pink Southwest Kodiak District Index (3 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 70 to 160 thousand 1977 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 0 Nelson et al 2005 Partition archepelago Pink Southwest Kodiak District Index (3 systems) even yearDirected AS Man. Obj. SEG 820 to 2,050 thousand 1978 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 1 3.78 million Nelson et al 2005 Esc %tile Range, Chum Southwest Kodiak District Index (1 stream) Directed AS SEG threshold >7.3 thousand 1988 05 (lwr range lowered, changed to threshold) 3 96-7,01 10,643 Nelson et al 2005

Alitak Bay 5 AAC 18.361 Alitak Bay District Salmon ManageSockeye Upper Station River Early Run Directed Weir OEG OEG > 25 to 75 thousand 1978 83, 88, 99 (OEG), 05 (SEG lowered) 0 78,487 2/ Nelson et al 2005 District Sockeye Upper Station River Late Run Directed Weir BEG Stock recruit 120 to 265 thousand 1978 83, 88, 05 (changed to BEG, broadened) 1 01 177,108 Nelson et al 2005 Sockeye Fraser Lake Directed Weir BEG Stock recruit 70 to 150 thousand 1978 81, 86, 88, 05 (changed to BEG,lowered) 0 120,664 Nelson et al 2005 Partition archepelago Pink Alitak Bay District Index (4 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 500 to 1,250 thousand 1977 79, 81, 83, 85, 88, 2005 (changed from SEG) 0 Nelson et al 2005 Partition archepelago Pink Alitak Bay District Index (4 systems) even year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 280 to 690 thousand 1978 1980, 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 0 1.01 million Nelson et al 2005

Chum Alitak Bay District Index (6 streams) Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis, threshold >28 thousand 1988 2005 (lwr range raised, changed to threshold) 3 96-7,02 8,500 Nelson et al 2005

5 AAC 18.367 Eastside Kodiak Salmon Managem Sockeye Saltery Lake Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 15 to 30 thousand 1988 2001 0 54,800 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 Eastside Kodiak Partition archepelago District Pink Eastside Kodiak District Index (7 systems) odd year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 450 to 1,130 thousand 1977 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 0 Nelson et al 2005 Partition archepelago Pink Eastside Kodiak District Index (7 systems) even year Directed AS Man. Obj. SEG 180 to 450 thousand 1978 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 1 1.26 million Nelson et al 2005

Chum Eastside Kodiak District Index (16 streams) Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis, threshold >50 thousand 1988 2005 (lwr range raised, changed to threshold) 7 94-98,00-01 75,750 Nelson et al 2005 Coho Pasagshak River Directed FS SEG Stock Recruitg, 1.2 to 3.3 thousand 1988 1999, 2005 (range broadened) 0 3,402 Nelson et al 2005 Sockeye Pasagshak River Directed AS SEG analysis 3 to 12 thousand 1988 2005 (raised ) 2 94,98 46,400 Nelson et al 2005

Partition archepelago 5 AAC 18.367 Eastside Kodiak Salmon Managem Pink Northeast Kodiak District Index (3 systems) odd year Directed AS, Weir Man. Obj. SEG 230 to 570 thousand 1977 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 0 Nelson et al 2005 Northeast Kodiak Partition archepelago District Pink Northeast Kodiak District Index (3 systems) even year Directed AS, Weir Man. Obj. SEG 130 to 320 thousand 1978 1988, 2005 (changed from SEG) 2 600,430 Nelson et al 2005

Chum Northeast Kodiak District Index (~18 streams) Directed AS SEG Risk Analysis, threshold 9 thousand 1988 2005 (lwr range raised, changed to threshold) 7 94,96-00,03 2,156 Nelson et al 2005 Coho Buskin Lake Incidental Weir SEG Stock Recruit 3.2 to 7.2 thousand 1988 1999, 2005 (changed to BEG, lowered) 0 9,599 Nelson et al 2005 Theoretical Stock Coho Olds Incidental FS SEG Recruit 1 to 2.2 thousand 1988 2005 (raised) 2 94,02 1,860 Nelson et al 2005 Theoretical Stock Coho American River Incidental FS SEG Recruit 0.4 to 0.9 thousand 1988 2005 (raised) 6 94-6,99-01 753 Nelson et al 2005 Sockeye Buskin Lake Incidental Weir, AS SEG Avg. Esc. 8 to 13 thousand 1990 1996 0 22,023 Nelson and Lloyd 2001 1/ Small stock, little directed fishing during post June period. 2/ OEG remains in place, despite change of SEG. 7-20-05 update Years Years Below Certification Assessment Target Reference Date Current Unit Fishery Regulations and Management Plans Species Stocks Fishery Target Method TRP Status Basis of TRP Point Implemented History of Changes 4/ TRP, 94 - 03 Below 2004 Escape Notes Bristol Bay 5 AAC 06.310-.350 Gear/Seasons/Area Gillnet Naknek-Kvichak 5 AAC 06.355 Sockeye off cycle Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit 2 to 10 million 1962 Numerous; '98 dec 5 96-7,01-03 1/ DistrictBristol Bay Set and Drift Gillnet Sockeye Kvichak River pre-peak/peak cyDirected Tower BEG Stock Recruit 6 to 10 million 1964 99 range established 1 00 5.5 million 1/ Fisheries Management Sockeye Naknek River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit 0.8 to 1.4 million 1963 84 range established 0 1.939 million and Allocation Plan Sockeye Directed Tower, AS SEG Stock Recruit 170 to 200 thousand 1964 Changed annually from 64-71; '73 0 5.397 million 5 AAC 06.360Naknek River Sockeye Salmon Special Chinook Naknek River Index Incidental AS SEG Avg Escape 5 thousand 1994 3 94,99,02 12,878 Harvest Area Management Plan Chinook Alagnak River Index Incidental AS No goal Under Review - 5 AAC 06.364Naknek-Kvichak District Set and Drift - Gillnet Sockeye Salmon Fisheries - Management and Allocation Plan -

Egegik District 5 AAC 06.355Bristol Bay Set and Drift Gillnet Sockeye Egegik River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit .800 to 1.4 million 1962 1984 range, 1995 U range inc 0 1.29 million Sockeye Salmon Fisheries Management and Allocation Plan - 5 AAC 06.359Egegik River Sockeye Salmon Special - Harvest Area Management Plan - - 5 AAC 06.365Egegik District Set and Drift Gillnet - Sockeye Salmon Fisheries Management - and Allocation Plan - Chinook Egegik River Incidental AS No goal Under Review

Ugashik District 5 AAC 06.355Bristol Bay Set and Drift Gillnet Sockeye Ugashik River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit .5 to 1.2 million 1962 1984 range, 1995 U range inc 0 776,000 Sockeye Salmon Fisheries Management - and Allocation Plan - 5 AAC 06.357Ugahik River Sockeye Salmon Special - Harvest Area Management Plan - - 5 AAC 06.366Ugashik District Set and Drift Gillnet - Sockeye Salmon Fisheries Management - and Allocation Plan -

Nushagak District 5 AAC 06.355Bristol Bay Set and Drift Gillnet Sockeye Wood River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit .7 to 1.5 million 1962 1984 range, 1995 U range inc 0 1.543 million Sockeye Salmon Fisheries Management Sockeye Igushik River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit 150 to 300 thousand 1962 1984 range established 2 97,02 110,000 and Allocation Plan Sockeye Nushagak River Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 340 to 760 thousand 1962 1986 Nushagak River Goal 3 95,99,02 485,000 2/ 5 AAC 06.358 Wood River Sockeye Salmon Special Harvest Area Management Plan 5 AAC 06.361Nushagak-Mulchatna Chinook Nushagak River Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 65 thousand 1984 inriver goal established 3 96,99,00 116,000 Management Plan Coho Nushagak River Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 50 to 100 thousand 1984 1992 reduced 3 95,99,02 153,000 Pink Nushagak River Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit .6 to 1.1 million 1970 1980 inc, 1992 dec 4 94,98,00,02 556,000 3/ Chum Nushagak River Incidental sonar No goal Under Review

Togiak District 5 AAC 06.355Bristol Bay Set and Drift Gillnet Sockeye Togiak River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit 100 to 200 thousand 1962 84 increased 0 129,000 Sockeye Salmon Fisheries Management Coho Togiak River Directed AS SEG 50,000 1984 3 97,98,99 N/A and Allocation Plan Chinook Togiak River Incidental AS SEG 10,000 1991 1 03 12,324 Togiak District Salmon FMP

Sockeye Kulukak Bay Incidental AS No goal Under Review Coho Kulukak Bay Incidental AS No goal Under Review 1/ Yield concern established, changed to management concern in 2003 2/ Although the BEG was not met in 1999 and 2002, an OEG of 235,000 fish established by the Board of Fisheries was in place in those years and was met. See 5 AAC 06.358 (c)(1)(B) for details. 3/ Almost no directed fishing for due to lack of interest. Escapement goals do not reflect productivity for this stock and will be reviewed. 4/ History of changes to goals not comprehensive. See Fried, S. 1994. ADF&G, Commercial Fisheries Management and Development Division, Special Publication No. 8 for comprehensive list of goal changes through 1994. Years Below -20-05 update Fishery Assessment Target Reference Date Current TRP, 2004 Certification UnitFisheryRegulations and Management Plans Species Stocks TargetMethod TRP Status Basis of TRP Point Implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Years BelowEscape Notes

Kotzebue Sound Kotzebue Sound 5 AAC 03 Gear/Seasons/Area Chum Noatak and Eli Rivers (Aerial) Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 64.000 - 128,000 1999 2004 clarified as SEG 0 53,058 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 00-03 Gillnet Chum Upper Kobuk w/ Selby River Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 8,000 - 16,000 1999 2004 clarified as SEG 1 02 26,018 survey conditions not adequate for assessment 94,97,98,00,03 River Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 3,200 - 6,400 1999 2004 clarified as SEG 0 No survey survey conditions not adequate for assessment 94,97,98,00-03 Chum Tutuksuk Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,200 - 2,400 1999 2004 clarified as SEG 0 No survey survey conditions not adequate for assessment 94,97,98,00-03 Chum Squirrel Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 7,200-14,400 1999 2004 clarified as SEG 0 No survey survey conditions not adequate for assessment 94,97,98,00-03

Norton Sound 5 AAC 04 Gear/Seasons/Area Gillnet Subdistrict 1 5 AAC 04.358 Subdistrict 1 OEG Chum Subdistrict 1 Aggregate Directed Multiple BEG Stock Recruit 23,000-35,000 2001 2 99,03 23,787 1/ Chum Sinuk River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 4,000-6,200 2001 2004 Clarified as SEG 1 03 3,197 TRP represents expanded aerial survey counts (ASC) Chum Nome River Directed Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,900-4,300 2001 2004 Clarified as SEG 5 98-9,01-3 3,903 OEG = 2,900-4,300 (5AAC 04.358) Chum Bonanza River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,300-3,400 2001 2004 Clarified as SEG 2 99,03 2,168 TRP represents expanded aerial survey counts (ASC) Chum Snake River Directed Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,600-2,500 2001 2004 Clarified as SEG 1 99 2,145 OEG=1,600-2,500 (5AAC 04.358) Chum Solomon River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,100-1,600 2001 2004 Clarified as SEG 4 98-9,00,03 1,436 TRP represents expanded aerial survey counts (ASC) Chum Flambeau River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 4,100-6,300 2001 2004 Clarified as SEG 4 98-9,02-3 7,667 TRP represents expanded aerial survey counts (ASC) Chum Eldorado River Directed Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,000-9,200 2001 2004 Clarified as SEG 2 99,03 3,273 OEG=6,000-9,200 (5AAC 04.358) Sockeye Salmon L./Grand Central R. Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 4,000-8,000 1999 0 25,860 Sockeye Glacial Lake Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 800-1,600 1999 4 95,97,99,02 907 SEG Esc.%tile Pink Nome River even-year Incidental Weir Threshold >13,000 1999 0 1,051,146 SEG Esc.%tile Pink Nome River odd-year Incidental Weir Threshold >3,200 2004 0

SEG Esc.%tile 5 AAC 04.390Subdistrict 2,3 Chum Niukluk River Directed Tower Threshold >30,000 2004 2 00,03 10,770 2/ Subdistrict 2,3 FMP Chum Kwiniuk River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit 10,000-20,000 2001 1 99 10,362 OEG=11,500-23,000 (5AAC 04.390) Chum Tubutuluk River Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 8,000-16,000 2001 2 96,03 No Survey survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 98-02; OEG=9,200-18,400 (5AAC 04.390) SEG Esc.%tile 2004, Threshold at Old Chinook Fish/Boston River Incidental AS Threshold >100 1999 Goal 0 112 Coho Niukluk and Ophir River Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 950-1,900 1999 1 98 953 Coho Kwiniuk R. Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 650-1,300 1999 4 97-00 1,237 Chinook Kwiniuk R. Incidental Tower SEG Esc. %tile Range 300-550 1999 2004 clarified as SEG 1 00 663 SEG Esc.%tile 2004, Threshold Below Pink Kwiniuk R. Incidental Tower Threshold >8,400 1999 Old Goal 1 99 3,054,684 SEG Esc.%tile Pink Niukluk R. Incidental Tower Threshold >10,500 2004 0 975,895

Subdistrict 4,5,6 Chinook Shaktoolik Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 400-800 1999 2004 clarified as SEG 6 4,96,98,01-03 91 3/ Chinook North River, Unalakleet Incidental Tower SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,200 - 2,600 2004 1 00 1,104 SEG Esc.%tile Pink North River, Unalakleet Incidental Tower Threshold >25,000 1999 2004, Raise Threshold 0 1,149,294 Chum Old Woman River, Unalakleet Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,400-4,800 1999 420 No data in 94,2000-01; incomplete data in 95-6,98-9,2002-3 (ADF&G RIR 3A04-01) Coho North River, Unalakleet Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 550-1,100 1999 2 98-9 1,086 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 94,97,00-01,03

Yukon River

5 AAC 05 Gear/Seasons/Area Gillnet,Fishwheel Chinook Yukon River Drainage Directed M/R No Esc. Goal NA 4/ Estimate not available Yukon River King SEG 2004, Range Bracket Old 5 AAC 05.360 Salmon FMP Chinook East Fork Directed AS Esc. %tile Range 960-1,900 1992 Goal 0 2,879 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 92,94,96,99,03 Chinook SEG 2004, Range Bracket Old Salmon Fishery Chinook West Fork Andreafsky River Directed AS Esc. %tile Range 640-1,600 1992 Goal 3 96,00,01 1,317 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 92,94,98,99 SEG 2004, Range Bracket Old Chinook Anvik River Directed AS Esc. %tile Range 1,100-1,700 1992 Goal 2 96,98 3,681 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 92,94,98,99,03 Chinook Nulato River(both forks combined)Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 940-1,900 2004 2004, Establish 0 1,321 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 97,99,00,03 Chinook Gisasa River Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 420-1,100 1992 2004, Establish 1 95 731 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 96-00,03 Chinook Chena River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit 2,800 to 5,700 2001 0 9,645 Chinook Salcha River Directed Tower BEG Stock Recruit 3,300 to 6,500 2001 1 00 15,887 Note: Yukon River Panel escapement targets were achieved in 7 Chinook Upper Yukon River (Canadian) Directed M/R Treaty Target Negotiated >28,000 2004 3 98,99,00 40,408 out of the 10 years; not achieved in 1998,1999 and 2000.

5 AAC 05.362Yukon River Chum Andreafsky River East Fork Directed Weir/AS BEG Stock Recruit 65,000-130,000 2001 4 97,99,00,02 62,730 5/ Summer Chum No Esc. Goal Summer Chum 5 AAC 05.367Salmon FMP Chum Yukon River above Pilot Station Directed Sonar 1,329,696 Salmon Fishery Chum Anvik River Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 350,000-700,000 2001 2004, Lowered Slightly 3 00,01,03 365,691

5 AAC 05.365Yukon River Fall Chum Yukon River Drainage Directed Run Recon. BEG Stock Recruit 300,000-600,000 2001 4 98-01 645,000 6/ Fall Chum Chum Salmon FMP Chum Tanana River Directed M/R BEG Stock Recruit 61,000-136,000 2001 1 00 155,378 Salmon Fishery 5 AAC 05.367Tanana River Chum Directed FS BEG Stock Recruit 6,000-13,000 2001 1 00 25,073 Salmon FMP Chum Toklat Directed FS BEG Stock Recruit 15,000-33,000 2001 4 97,99-01 35,480 Chum Upper Yukon River Tributaries Directed Sonars & WeBEG Stock Recruit 152,000-312,000 2001 4 98-00,02 194,629 No estimate for Chandalar in 1994 but would have made the goal Chum Chandalar River Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 74,000-152,000 2001 1 00 137,088 No estimate for Chandalar in 1994 but would have made the goal Chum Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 50,000-104,000 2001 5 98-00,02-03 37,877 Fishery Assessment Target Reference Date Current TRP, 2004 Certification UnitFisheryRegulations and Management Plans Species Stocks TargetMethod TRP Status Basis of TRP Point Implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Years BelowEscape Notes Chum Fishing Branch River (CanadiaDirected Weir Treaty Negotiated >13,000 1987 6 97-02 19,664 Note: Yukon River Panel escapement targets were achieved in all years (2003,2004) Chum Upper Yukon R.F96 Mainstem (CaDirected M/R Treaty Negotiated >80,000 1990 4 98-01 100,474 Note: Yukon Panel escapement target for 2003-05 was 65,000

Yukon River Coho No Esc. Goal 5 AAC 05.369 Salmon FMP Coho Yukon River Drainage Incidental Sonar (limite Coho Salmon SEG 2004, Range Bracket Old Fishery Coho Delta Clearwater River Incidental BS Esc. %tile Range 5,200-17,000 1992 Goal 0 37,550

Kuskokwim 5 AAC 07.010-.3Gear/Seasons/Area Gillnet 5 AAC 07.365Kuskokwim River Chinook Kuskokwim River Drainage Directed M/R No esc goal No Esc. Goal 7/ Salmon Rebuilding Kwethluk River AS SEG 580-1,800 2001 2004, Range Brackets Old 198 Kuskokwim Management Plan Chinook Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 6,801 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 92-97,99-01 River (Districts Kisaralik River AS SEG 400-1,200 2001 2004, Range Brackets Old 0 1,2) Chinook Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 6,913 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 94,96,99,01-02 Aniak River AS SEG 1,200-2,300 2001 2004, Range Brackets Old 100 Chinook Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 5,569 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 94,96,99,01-02 Salmon (Aniak drainage) AS SEG 330-1,200 2001 2004, Range Brackets Old 100 Chinook Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 2,177 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 99 Holitna AS SEG 970-2,100 2001 2004, Range Brackets Old 100 Chinook Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 4,842 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 94,96,98,03 Salmon (Pitka Fork drainage) AS SEG 470-1,600 2001 2004, Range Brackets Old 100 Chinook Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 1,138 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 96-99 Kogrukluk River Weir SEG 5,300-14,000 2001 2004, Range Brackets Old 100 Chinook Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 19,651 Chinook Cheneetmuk R. Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 340-1,300 2004 New,adopted in 2004 0 918 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 96,98-02 Chinook Gagaraya R. Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 300-830 2004 New,adopted in 2004 101670 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 96-00 Kuskokwim River Drainage M/R No Esc. Goal Chum Directed 7/ Aniak River Sonar SEG 210,000-370,000 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 2 99,00 Chum Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 673,444 Based on enumeration with DIDSON sonar euqipment, which yields count approx 20% higher Krogrukluk River Weir SEG 15,000-49,000 2002 2004, Range Brackets Old 3 97,99,00 Chum Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 24,201 Coho Kuskokwim River Drainage Directed M/R No esc goal No Esc. Goal Kogrukluk River Weir SEG 13,000-28,000 2001 2004, Range Bracket Old 2 97,99 Coho Directed Esc. %tile Range Goal 27,041

District 4 Salmon Kanektok River AS SEG 14,000-34,000 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 10 Kuskokwim Bay5 AAC 07.367 FMP Sockeye Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 78,380 Kanektok River Incidental AS SEG Esc.,%tile >5,200 1992 2004 threshold Below Old 2 94,03 Chum Threshold Minimum Goal survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 92,96,99,02,04 Kanektok River Incidental AS SEG 3,500-8,000 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 100 Chinook Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 28,375 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 96,97,99,02 Kanektok River AS SEG 7,700-36,000 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 199 Coho Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 93-97,01-04

Mainstem Goodnews River (& Lak AS SEG 5,500-19,500 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 2 98,02 Kuskokwim Bay, District 5 Sockeye Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 31,695 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 93-94,96,99-00 Goodnews River (Middle Fork) Weir SEG 23,000-58,000 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 2 98,02 Sockeye Directed Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 56,466 Goodnews River (Middle Fork) Incidental Weir SEG Esc. %tile >12,000 1992 2004 threshold Below Old 0 Chum Threshold Minimum Goal 31,218 Goodnews River Incidental AS SEG 640-3,300 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 198 Chinook Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 7,462 survey conditions not adequate for assessment, 93-96,99-00 Goodnews River (Middle Fork) Incidental Weir SEG 2,000 to 4,500 1992 2004, Range Brackets Old 0 Chinook Esc. %tile Range Minimum Goal 4,348 Goodnews River (Middle Fork) Weir SEG Esc. %tile >12,000 2004 1 Coho Directed Threshold New,adopted in 2004 99 47,916 Assessment began in 1997 1/ Nome subd chum salmon are considered Stock of Management Concern. 2/ N.S. Subd 2 and 3 chum stock are considered Stock of Yield Concern. 3/ Subd 5 & 6 (Shaktoolik/Unalakleet) chinook are considered Stock of Yield Concern. 4/ Yukon chinook are considered Stock of Yield Concern. 5/ Yukon summer chum are considered Stock of Management Concern 6/ Yukon fall chum are considered Stock of Yield Concern. 7/ Kuskokwin chinook & chum are considered Stocks of Yield Concern 7-20-05 Years update Below Years Current Fishery Assessment TRP Date TRP, 1994 Certification Unit Fishery Regulations and Management Plans Species Stocks Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point implemented History of Changes - 2003 Below 2004 Escape Notes Reference Upper Cook 5 AAC 21.310-.355 Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Inlet Gillnet Northern District 5 AAC 21.356 Cook Inlet Pink Salmon Management Plan Chinook Susitna River Drainage Incidental 5 AAC 21.358 Northern District Salmon Management Plan Chinook Alexander Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,100-6,000 1993 2001,range established 3 94,02,03 2,215 Bue et al 2001 5 AAC 21. 360Northern District King Salmon Management Chinook Chuitna River Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,200-2,900 1993 2001,range established 2 94,95 2,938 Bue et al 2001 Plan Chinook Chulitna River Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,800-5,100 1993 2001,range established 0 2,162 no survey 2004 Bue et al 2001 5 AAC 21.363 Upper Cook Inlet Salmon Management Plan Chinook Clear Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 950-3,400 1993 2001,range established 0 3,417 no survey 2004 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Deshka River Incidental AS, Weir BEG Stock Recruit 13,000-28,000 1993 1999, 2001 range established 1 95 57,934 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Goose Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 250-650 1993 2001,range established 1 03 417 no survey 2001 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Lake Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,500-7,100 1993 2001,range established 1 94 7,598 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Lewis River Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 250-800 1993 2001,range established 2 94,95 1,000 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Little Willow Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 450-1,800 1993 2001,range established 0 2,227 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Montana Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,100-3,100 1993 2001,range established 0 2,117 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Prairie Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 3,100-9,200 1993 2001,range established 1 94 5,570 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Sheep Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 600-1,200 1993 2001,range established 2 94 285 No data '97,99,01,03 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Talachulitna River Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,200-5,000 1993 2001,range established 1 94 8,352 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Theodore River Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 500-1,700 1993 2001,range established 1 96 491 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Willow Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,600-2,800 1993 2001,range established 1 94 na Bue et al 2001 Chinook Campbell Creek Incidental FS SEG Esc. %tile Range 50-700 1993 2001, range established 0 964 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Eagle River - S. Fork Incidental FS SEG Esc. %tile Range 50-350 1992 2001,range established 1 2 47 Poor surveys '02,'04 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Little Susitna River Incidental Weir,AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 900-1,800 1993 2001,range established 0 1,694 No data '97,99 Bue et al 2001 Chinook Peters Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,000-2,600 1993 2001,range established 2 94,96 3,757 Bue et al 2001 Sockeye Susitna River Drainage Directed Sockeye Yentna River Directed Sonar SEG Esc. %tile Range 90 to 160 thousand 1979 1996, 2001 broadened range 2 01,02 71,281 Bue et al 2001 Sockeye Fish Creek (Knik) Directed Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 20 to 70 thousand 1982 2002, range established lowered 1 00 22,157 enhanced stock Bue et al 2001 Chum Susitna River Drainage Incidental No Assessment Coho Susitna River Drainage Incidental Coho Jim Creek Incidental FS SEG Esc. %tile Range 450 to 700 1994 1999, 2001 lowered 2 96,99 4,652 Bue et al 2001 Coho Campbell Creek Incidental FS SEG Esc. %tile Range 100 to 500 1994 2001,range established 1 3 na Bue et al 2001 Coho Little Susitna River Incidental Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 10,100 to 17,700 1999 2001, increased 2 97,99 40,199 Bue et al 2001 Chum Clearwater Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 3,800-8,400 1982 2001, range established & lowered 2 94,98 na Hasbrouck and Edmundson 2004

Central District 5 AAC 21.356 Cook Inlet Pink Salmon Management Plan Chinook Anchor River Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 750-1,500 1993 2001, lowered 1 834 Bue et al 2001 5 AAC 21.357 Kenai River Coho Salmon Conservation Plan Chinook Crooked Creek Incidental Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 650-1,700 1988 2002 range established 1 2,196 Bue et al 2001 5 AAC 21.358 Northern District Salmon Management Plan Chinook Deep Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 350-800 1993 1999, 2001 lowered 0 1,075 Bue et al 2001 5 AAC 21.359Kenai River Late-Run King Salmon Chinook Kenai River - Early Run Incidental Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 4,000-9,000 1993 1999, 2004 lowered 0 15,498 Hasbrouck and Edmundson 2004 Management Plan Chinook Kenai River - Late Run Incidental Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 17,800-35,700 1993 1999 0 56,205 Bue et al 2001 5 AAC 21.360Kenai River Late-Run Sockeye Salmon Chinook Ninilchik River Incidental Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 400-850 1993 1999, 2001 lowered 1 03 416 Bue et al 2001 Management Plan Sockeye Crescent River Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit, Lake Productivity 30 to 70 thousand 1979 1986,1999 lowered, 2004 raised 1 96 103,201 Hasbrouck and Edmundson 2004 5 AAC 21.361Russian River Sockeye Salmon Management Sockeye Kasilof River Directed Sonar BEG Stock Recruit 150 to 250 thousand 1968 1986 0 577,581 Bue et al 2001 Plan Sockeye Kenai River Directed Sonar SEG Stock Recruit 500 to 800 thousand 1968 1972, 1978 inc, 1999 inc,2004 changed 1 01 1,385,981 Hasbrouck and Edmundson 2004 Early Kenai River King Salmon management 5 AAC 21.362 Pln Sockeye Russian River - Early Run Incidental Weir SEG Stock Recruit 14 to 37 thousand early 1970s 1979, 1990, 2001 range est, 2004 chan 0 56,562 Hasbrouck and Edmundson 2004 5 AAC 21.363 Upper Cook Inlet Salmon Management Plan Sockeye Russian River - Late Run Directed Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 30 to 110 thousand early 1970s 2001 range estab, 2004 lwrd slightly 0 110,244 Hasbrouck and Edmundson 2004

5 AAC 21.364 Kasilof River Salmon Management Plan Coho Kenai River Incidental Smolt, CWT No goal 5 AAC 21.370 Packers Creek Sockeye Salmon Management Plan 5 AAC 21.368 Big River Sockeye Salmon Management Plan Current Fishery Assessment TRP Date TRP, 1994 Certification Unit Fishery Regulations and Management Plans Species Stocks Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point implemented History of Changes - 2003 Below 2004 Escape Notes Reference Lower Cook Net Kamishak Bay District 5 AAC 21.310-.355 Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Pink Kamishak Bay District Index (3 streams) 5 AAC 21.369 Pink Bruin River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 18,650 to 155,750 1982 2001, range broadened 3 94,99,01 66,494 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Sunday Creek Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 4,850 to 28,850 1989 2001, range broadened 2 94,96 31,497 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Brown's Peak Creek Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,450 to 18,800 1989 2001, range broadened 2 94,96 18,100 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Kamishak Bay District Index (7 streams) Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Lower Cook Inlet Seine Management Plan Chum Big Kamishak River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 9,350 to 24,000 1982 2001 range established 1 98 57,897 no data (94-5,97) Chum L. Kamishak River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,550 to 23,800 1982 2001 range established 1 96 45,342 (no data 95,97) Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum McNeil River Incidental ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 13,750 to 25,750 1988 2001, range lowered 1 02 11,203 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Bruin River Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,000 to 10,250 1988 2001, range raised 0 15,886 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Ursus Cove Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,050 to 6,850 1982 2001, range narrowed 1 98 15,988 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Cottonwood Creek Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 5,750 to 12,000 1982 2001 range established 2 97,98 16,277 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Iniskin Bay Directed ASE SEG Esc. %tile Range 7,850 to 13,700 1982 2001 range established 1 96 22,044 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Sockeye Chenik Lake Directed AS, Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,880 to 9,300 1990 2001 range established 3 94,95,01 17,006 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Sockeye Amakdedori Creek Incidental AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,250 to 2,600 1984 2001, range raised 1 94 7,200 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Sockeye Mikfik Lake Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,300 to 12,150 1988 2001, range raised 1 201 14,020 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004

Southern District 5 AAC 21.369 Pink Southern District Index (6 streams) Pink Humpy Creek Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 21,650 to 85,550 1982 2001, range broadened 4 94,96,98,99 28,945 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink China Poot Creek Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,900 to 8,200 1982 2001 range established 3 95-97 3,335 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Tutka Creek Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,500 to 17,000 1982 2001, range raised 2 96,01 17,846 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Barabara Creek Directed FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,900 to 8,950 1982 2001, range broadened 0 5,395 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Seldovia Creek Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 19,050 to 38,950 1982 2001, range broadened 3 96,99,01 56,763 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Port Graham River Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 7,700 to 19,850 1977 2001, range lowered 2 94,96 44,010 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Lower Cook Inlet Seine Fishery Management Chum Port Graham River Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,450 to 4,800 1982 2001, range lowered 0 1,177 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Plan 5 AAC 21.377Port Graham Salmon Hatchery Management Sockeye English Bay Directed AS, weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,000 to 13,500 1982 2001, range lowered 0 15,352 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Plan

Outer District 5 AAC 21.369 Pink Outer District Index (8 streams) Pink Port Chatham Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 7,800 to 21,000 1982 2001, range broadened 1 94 26,375 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Windy Creek Right Directed FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 3,350 to 10,950 1982 2001 range established 2 94,99 11,974 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Windy Creek Left Directed FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 3,650 to 29,950 1982 2001, range lowered 2 94,96 23,286 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Rocky River Directed FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 9,350 to 54,250 1982 2001 range established 0 53,760 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Port Dick Creek Directed FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 18,550 to 58,300 1982 2001, range lowered 3 94,95,99 13,323 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Island Creek Directed FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 7,200 to 28,300 1982 2001, range broadened 0 33,573 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink S. Nuka Island Creek Directed FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,700 to 14,250 1982 2001 range established 2 94,99 6,432 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Desire Lake Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,900 to 20,200 1986 2001, range broadened 0 24,258 no data (94-96) Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Lower Cook Inlet Seine Fishery Management Chum Outer District Index (4 streams) SEG Esc. %tile Range Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Plan Chum Dogfish Lagoon Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 3,350 to 9,150 1982 2001, range lowered 0 3,617 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Rocky River Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,200 to 5,400 1982 2001 range established 2 97,98 17,159 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Port Dick Creek Incidental ASE or FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 1,900 to 4,450 1982 2001 range established 1 1 8,620 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Chum Island Creek Directed ASE or FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 6,400 to 15,600 1979 2001, range lowered 3 97,98,01 15,135 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Sockeye Desire Lake Directed AS, weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 8,800 to 15,200 1982 2001 range established 4 98,00,01,03 10,700 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Sockeye Delight Lake Directed AS, weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 5,950 to 12,550 1982 2001 range established 1 94 7,262 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004

Eastern District 5 AAC 21.369 Pink Eastern District Index (5 streams) Pink Bear Creek/Salmon Creek Combined Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 5,000 to 23,500 1982 2001 range established, 2 crks combin 6 96-7,99,01-3 547 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Thumb Cove Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 2,350 to 8,850 1985 2001 range established 0 4,250 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Humpy Cove Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 900 to 3,200 1985 2001 range established 1 1 990 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Pink Tonsina Creek Incidental FSE SEG Esc. %tile Range 500 to 5,850 1982 2001 range established 2 96-7 3,450 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Lower Cook Inlet Seine Fishery Management Sockeye Aialik Lake Directed AS SEG Esc. %tile Range 3,700 to 8,000 1982 2001, range raised 2 95-6 10,100 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 Plan 5 AAC 21.375 Bear Lake Management Plan Sockeye Bear Lake Directed Weir SEG Esc. %tile Range 700 to 8,300 1985 2001, range broadened 0 8,061 Otis and Hasbrouck 2004 5 AAC 21.376 Resurrection Bay Salmon Management Plan Current Fishery Assessment TRP Date TRP, 1994 Certification Unit Fishery Regulations and Management Plans Species Stocks Target Method Status Basis of TRP Target Reference Point implemented History of Changes - 2003 Below 2004 Escape Notes Reference

Prince William 5 AAC 24.100 - .355Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting Sound Net

PW Sound (comb. dists) Pink PWilliam S (comb. dists, even & odd yrs) Directed ASE SEG Yield Analysis-Total PWS 1.25 to 2.75 million 2002 established in 2002 1 95 1,996,223 Bue et al 2002 Southwestern District 5 AAC 24.270Prince William Sound Management and Pink Southwestern District Index, even year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 130 to 285 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 upper end raised 2 96,02 108,891 Bue et al 2002 Salmon Enhancement Allocation Plan Pink Southwestern District Index, odd year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 100 to 225 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 1 95 n/a Bue et al 2002

5 AAC 24.367 Eshamy DistrictMain Bay Hatchery Harvest Management Plan Sockeye Eshamy Lake Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 20,000 to 40,000 1972 1986+,2002 - lower end 1 96 13,443 No weir in '98 Bue et al 2002 Pink Eshamy District Index, even year Incidental ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 5 to 15 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 4 96,98,00,02 2,300 Bue et al 2002 Pink Eshamy District Index, odd year Incidental ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 5 to 10 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 2 97,01 n/a Bue et al 2002 5 AAC 24.270 Northwestern DistrictPrince William Sound Management and Pink Northwestern District Index, even year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 110 to 240 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 4 96,98,00,02 51,306 Bue et al 2002 Salmon Enhancement Allocation Plan Pink Northwestern District Index, odd year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 65 to 145 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 3 95,97,99 na Bue et al 2002 Chum Northwestern District Index Incidental ASE SEG SEG, Esc. %tile Range 5 to 19 thousand 1977 2002, lowered 2 95,99 10,371 Bue et al 2002 5 AAC 24.270 Coghill DistrictPrince William Sound Management and Pink Coghill District Index, even year Incidental ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 115 to 250 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 4 94,96,98,02 79,010 Bue et al 2002 Salmon Enhancement Allocation Plan Pink Coghill District Index, odd year Incidental ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 125 to 275 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 2 95,97 na Bue et al 2002 Chum Coghill District Index Incidental ASE SEG SEG, Esc. %tile Range 8 to 25 thousand 1977 2002, lowered 3 97,99,02 9,685 Bue et al 2002 Sockeye Coghill Lake Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 20,000 to 40,000 1972 1986+,1992-,2002 +upper end 1 94 30,569 Bue et al 2002 5 AAC 24.270 Northern DistrictPrince William Sound Management and Pink Northern District Index, even year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 175 to 390 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 2 00,02 158,958 Bue et al 2002 Salmon Enhancement Allocation Plan Pink Northern District Index, odd year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 110 to 235 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 2 95,97 na Bue et al 2002 Chum Northern District Index Incidental ASE SEG SEG, Esc. %tile Range 20 to 60 thousand 1977 2002, broadened range 1 97 42,456 Bue et al 2002 5 AAC 24.270 Prince William Sound Management and Eastern DistrictSalmon Enhancement Allocation Plan Pink Eastern District Index, even year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 425 to 930 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 2 98,02 724,663 Bue et al 2002 Pink Eastern District Index, odd year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 355 to 780 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 broadened range 1 97 na Bue et al 2002 5 AAC 24.270 Chum Eastern District Index Incidental ASE SEG SEG, Esc. %tile Range 50 to 130 thousand 1977 2002, broadened range 1 94 108,833 Bue et al 2002 Prince William Sound Management and Salmon Enhancement Allocation Plan

Southeastern District 5 AAC 24.270Prince William Sound Management and Pink Southeastern District Index, even year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 215 to 470 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 upper end raised 2 94,98 687,903 Bue et al 2002 Salmon Enhancement Allocation Plan Pink Southeastern District Index, odd year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 335 to 735 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 raised 1 96 na Bue et al 2002 Chum Southeastern District Index Incidental ASE SEG SEG, Esc. %tile Range 15 to 20 thousand 1977 2002, lowered 1 94 42,344 Bue et al 2002

Montague District Pink Montague District Index, even year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 75 to 170 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 raised 2 94,02 183,891 Bue et al 2002 Pink Montague District Index, odd year Directed ASE SEG Yield analysis-partition total SEG 155 to 345 thousand 1977 1990, 2002 raised 0 na Bue et al 2002

Copper/Bering District Gillnet Copper River District 5 AAC 24.360 Copper River District Salmon Management Pla Sockeye Upper Copper River Directed Sonar SEG SEG, yield analysis 300 to 500 thousand 1972 2002 range established 0 669,646 Stock Recruit data avaBue et al 2002 5 AAC 24.361Copper River Chinook Salmon Fishery Sockeye Copper River Delta Directed AS SEG SEG, Esc. %tile Range 55 to 130 thousand 1991 2002 broadened range 0 69,385 Bue et al 2002 Management Plan Coho Copper River Delta Directed AS SEG SEG, Avg. Esc. 32 to 67 thousand 1991 0 99,980 Bue et al 2002 Chinook Copper River Incidental AS, M/R,ASA SEG SEG, stock recruit > 24 thousand 1999 2002, established threshold 3 95,99,02 29,032 Stock Recruit data, lowBue et al 2002

Bering River District Sockeye Bering River Delta Directed AS SEG SEG, Esc. %tile Range 20 to 35 thousand 1991 2002 broadened range 1 01 25,135 Bue et al 2002 Coho Bering River Delta Directed AS SEG SEG, Avg. Esc. 13 to 33 thousand 1991 0 30,185 Bue et al 2002 7/20/05 Update Years Below Years Certification Fishery Assessment TRP Target Reference Date Current TRP, 2004 Unit Fishery Regulations and Management Plans Species Stocks Target Method Status Basis of TRP Point implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Below Escape. Notes Comments

Yakutat Set Net Set Gill Net Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting/Size Sockeye Situk River Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 30,000 to 70,000 1995 Re-examined in 2003, no change 0 42,544 5 AAC 30.100- .350,392-.393 Sockeye East Alsek-Doame R Sockeye Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 13,000 to 26,000 19953 (lowered from 26-57,000 to 13-26,000) 0 33,300 Situk-Ahrnklin Inlet and Lost River Chinook 5 AAC 30.365Salmon Commercial Fishery Management Sockeye Klukshu River Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 7,500 to 15,000 2000 2 99,00 13,721 Plan Sockeye Lost River Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 1,000 to 2,300 1995 1 98 1,123 Sockeye Akwe River Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 600 to 1,500 1995 3 94-96 NA Chinook Situk River Incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 450 to 1,050 199100-750); '97 (500-1,000); '03 (450-1,050) 0 798 Chinook Klukshu River Incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 1,100 to 2,300 1981 1991 (4,700); 1998 (1,100-2,300) 0 2,445 Coho Lost River Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 2,200 to 6,500 1994 1 98 5,047 Coho Tsiu/Tsivat River Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 10,000 to 29,000 1994 0 35,000 Coho Situk River Directed BS BEG Stock Recruit 3,300 to 9,800 1994 0 10,284 Pink Situk River Pink (even yr) Incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 42,000 to 105,000 1995 0 145,914 Pink Situk River Pink odd yr) incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 54,000 to 200,000 1995 1 99 NA Pink Humpy Creek Pink (even yr) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 3,300 to 8,000 1995 0 NA 4/ Pink Humpy Creek Pink (odd yr) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 7,000 to 18,000 1995 0 NA 4/

SE Alaska/ Troll Fishery 5 AAC 29.010- Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting/Size ChinookSoutheast Alaska Abundance Interception BEG Yakutat Troll .025,.070,.115- Index (PSC Chinook Model) .14 Chinook Taku River Directed M/R, CWT BEG Stock Recruit 30,000 to 55,000 1981 1985,1991, 2000 1 99 68,199 5 AAC 29.050Management of Salmon Troll Fishery in Chinook Stikine River Directed M/R, CWT BEG Stock Recruit 14,000 to 28,000 1981 1985,1991, 2000 0 48,900 Southeast Alaska -Yakutat Area Chinook Andrew Creek Directed Calibr. Survey BEG Stock Recruit 650 to 1,500 early 1980s 1985,1998 1 97 3,068 5 AAC 29.060General Harvest Ceiling and Allocation of Chinook Unuk River Directed Calibr. Survey BEG Stock Recruit 650 to 1,400 1981 1985,1994, 1997 1 97 1,008 3/ Chinook Salmon Chinook Blossom River Directed Calibr. Survey BEG Stock Recruit 250 to 500 1981 1994, 1997 10 94-03 333 1,3/ 5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon Chinook Chickamin River Directed Calibr. Survey BEG Stock Recruit 450 to 900 1981 1994, 1997 5 94-98 798 5 AAC 29.080 Management of Winter Troll Fishery Chinook Keta River Directed Calibr. Survey BEG Stock Recruit 250 to 500 1981 1994, 1997 3 95,97,98 376 3/ 5 AAC 29.090 Management of Spring Troll Fishery Chinook Chilkat River Directed M/R BEG Stock Recruit 1,750 to 3,500 1981 2003 0 3,422 5 AAC 29.100 Management of Summer Troll Fishery Chinook King Salmon River Directed Calibr. Survey BEG Stock Recruit 120 to 240 1981 mid-1980s, 1997 1 03 134 Coho Lost River (Yakutat) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 2,200 to 6,500 1994 1 98 5,047 Coho Tsiu/Tsivat River (Yakutat) Directed AS BEG Stock Recruit 10,000 to 29,000 1994 0 35,000 Coho Situk River (Yakutat) Directed BS BEG Stock Recruit 3,300 to 9,800 1994 0 10,284 5 AAC 29.110 Management of Coho Salmon Troll Fishery Coho Auke Creek Directed Full Indicat StockBEG Stock Recruit 200 to 500 1994 0 416 5 AAC 29.112 Management of Chum Salmon Troll Fishery Coho Berners River Directed Full Indicat StockBEG Stock Recruit 4,000 to 9,200 1994 0 14,450 3/ Coho Ford Arm Lake Directed Full Indicat StockBEG Stock Recruit 1,300 to 2,100 1994 0 3,539 Coho Hugh Smith Lake Directed Full Indicat StockBEG Stock Recruit 500 to 1,100 1994 0 840 Coho Taku River Directed M/R, CWT SEG Prof Judgment >38,000 1986 99(changed from range & raised) 0 132,405 Coho Juneau Road System Index (5 strmDirected Coho Montana Creek FS BEG Stock Recruit 200 to 500 1995 0 364 3/ Coho Steep Creek FS BEG Stock Recruit 100 to 300 1995 1 00 82 Coho Jordan Creek FS BEG Stock Recruit 75 to 200 1995 5 96-00 38 Coho Switzer Creek FS BEG Stock Recruit 25 to 75 1995 0 69 Coho Peterson Creek FS BEG Stock Recruit 100 to 350 1995 0 284 3/ Coho Chilkat River Directed MR,Calibr.SurveyNo goal New goal developed by Dec 2005 64,524 Coho Sitka Survey index (5 streams) Directed AS No goal New goal developed by Dec 2005 1,124 Coho Ketchikan Survey index (14 streamDirected AS No goal New goal developed by Dec 2005 9,904 Coho Chuck Creek Directed W No goal New indicator stock 1,212 Coho Nakwasina River Directed MR No goal New indicator stock 3,867

SE Alaska 5 AAC 33.010- Area/Seasons/Gear/Reporting/Size Purse Seine .350,.392-.394 NSE Inside 5 AAC 33.361United States - Canada salmon management Pink Northern Southeast Inside Directed AS BEG Yield Analysis 2.5 to 5.5 million 1970 71(raised),98 (split) , 03 (widened) 0 5,199,310 Pure Seineplan Pink SE Baranof Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .05 to .11 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 48,900 5 AAC 33.363 Pink E Baranof Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .07 to .14 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 291,800 Management guidelines for allocating Southeast Alaska pink,chum, and sockeye Pink Tebenkof Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .12 to .27 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 352,461 salmon between commercial net fisheries Pink Saginaw Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .07 to .15 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 318,060 5 AAC 33.367 Harvest and allocation of net caught salmon Pink Eliza Harbor Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .08 to .18 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 275,600 5 AAC 33.366Northern Southeast seine fishery Pink Portage Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .04 to .08 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 8 94-98,00-02 89,544 management plans. Pink Farragut Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .01 to .03 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 95 56,960 Pink Port Houghton Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .4 to .89 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 3 95-97 633,688 5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon Pink Pybus/Gambier Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .2 to .45 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 95 497,400 Pink Seymour Canal Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .18 to .41 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 95 308,886 Pink Stephens Passage Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .14 to .32 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 95,00 179,855 Pink SW Admiralty Island Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .08 to .17 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 416,251 Pink W Admiralty Island Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .04 to .08 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 3 98,00-01 188,835 Pink Tenakee Inlet Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .18 to .37 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 01 428,973 Pink Freshwater Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .06 to .13 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 198,409 Pink Kelp Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .03 to .06 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 95 78,800 Pink Hoonah Sound Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .4 to .9 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 3 95-97 525,250 Pink Lynn Canal Index-Dist 12 Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .02 to .04 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 96 46,022 Pink Homeshore Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .05 to .10 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 4 96,98,00,02 70,206 5/ Pink N Chichagof Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .28 to .62 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 5 96,98,00,'02,'04 164,132 5/ Pink Lynn Canal Index-Dist 15 AS No Target 29,279

Fall Chum Excursion River Directed AS No goal 5,200 Certification Fishery Assessment TRP Target Reference Date Current TRP, 2004 Unit Fishery Regulations and Management Plans Species Stocks Target Method Status Basis of TRP Point implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Below Escape. Notes Comments Fall Chum Chaik Bay Creek Directed AS No goal 13,000 Summer ChumTenakee Inlet (8 streams) Directed AS No goal 57,600 Summer ChumKelp Bay (2 systems) Directed AS No goal 8,600 Fall Chum Port Camden (2 systems) Directed AS No goal 3,300 Fall Chum Security Bay Directed AS No goal 13,100

5 AAC 33.361 United States - Canada salmon management SSE Purse Seine plan Pink Southern Southeast Directed AS BEG Yield Analysis 4.0 to 9.0 million 197071(raised), 1980s(raised), 2003(widened) 0 8,496,491 5 AAC 33.363 Pink Portland Canal Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .17 to.37 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 423,550 Management guidelines for allocating Pink E Behm Canal Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .84 to 1.89 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 1,460,967 Southeast Alaska pink,chum, and sockeye salmon between commercial net fisheries Pink W Behm Canal Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .33 to .74 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 94 595,200 Pink Moira Sound Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .06 to .17 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 97,04 38,104 Pink Kasaan Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .34 to .93 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 699,184 Pink E Dall Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .16 to .36 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 591,824 Pink Hetta Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .3 to .68 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 644,240 Pink Klawock Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .52 to 1.17 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 00 1,907,935 Pink Sea Otter Sound Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .15 to .33 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 97,00 346,700 Pink Shipley Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .14 to .27 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 02 166,827 Pink Affleck Canal Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .2 to .38 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 98 465,093 Pink Burnett Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .1 to .2 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 95,04 80,351 Pink Ratz Harbor Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .1 to .21 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 97,00 172,000 Pink Totem Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .07 to .15 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 1994 177,372 Pink Whale Pass Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .13 to .28 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 00,02 132,675 Pink Union Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .08 to .17 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 00,02 110,700 Pink Anan Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .32 to .68 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 447,265 Pink Stikine AS No Target 36,503

Fall Chum Cholmondeley Sound (2 systems) Directed AS No goal 60,000

5 AAC 33.367 Harvest and allocation of net caught salmon Sockeye Skeena River (Canadian) Incidental Interception 5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon Sockeye Nass River (Canadian) Incidental Interception Sockeye McDonald Lake Directed Calibrated FS BEG Stock Recruit 65,000 to 85,000 1993 5 95-6,98,01-02 21,279 3/ 5 AAC 33.390 Optimal escapement goal for sockeye salmonSockeye Hugh Smith Lake Incidental Weir BEG Stock Recruit 8,000 to 18,000 mid-1990s 03, changed to BEG & lowered 7 95-6,98-02 19,734 2/ in Hugh Smith Lake in Dist 1

NSE Outside Purse 5 AAC 33.361United States - Canada salmon management Pink Northern Southeast Outside Directed AS BEG Yield Analysis0.75 to 1.75 million 19988 (.81-1.16 million); range widened in '0 0 2,146,329 Seine plan gg gPink Whale Bay Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .05 to .12 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 285,800 5 AAC 33.363Southeast Alaska pink,chum, and sockeye Pink W Crawfish Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .01 to .03 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 97 95,000 salmon between commercial net fisheries Pink Sitka Sound Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .21 to .5 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 865,729 5 AAC 33.367 Harvest and allocation of net caught salmon Pink Salisbury Sound Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .16 to .36 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 1 94 375,800 Pink Slocum Arm Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .21 to .48 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 267,000 Pink Portlock Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .03 to .08 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 0 170,000 Pink Lisianski Index Directed AS Man. Obj. Partition BEG .07 to .17 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 4 94,96,98,00 87,000 5/

Sockeye Redfish Lake Directed W No goal 3rd consecutive yr of weir operation Sockeye Necker Bay Directed AS No goal 25,000 Summer ChumWhale Bay (2 systems) Directed AS No goal 10,100 Summer ChumW. Crawfish (NE Arm Hd) Directed AS No goal 13,000 Summer ChumSaook Bay (W.head) Directed AS No goal 3,500

5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon 5 AAC 01.760 Redoubt Bay and Lake sockeye salmon Sockeye Redoubt Lake Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 10,000 to 25,000 2003 2 00,01 77,263 fisheries management plan Certification Fishery Assessment TRP Target Reference Date Current TRP, 2004 Unit Fishery Regulations and Management Plans Species Stocks Target Method Status Basis of TRP Point implemented History of Changes 94 - 03 Below Escape. Notes Comments

SE Alaska Lynn Canal Gillnet 5 AAC 33.361United States - Canada salmon management Sockeye Chilkat Lake Directed M/R;Weir BEG Stock Recruit 52,000 to 106,000 1990 0 119,113 3/ Drift Gillnet (Dist 15) plan Sockeye Chilkoot Lake Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 50,500 to 91,500 1990 6 94-5,97-00 75,596 3/ 5 AAC 33.363Management guidelines for allocating Coho Berners River Directed Full Indicat StockBEG Stock Recruit 4,000 to 9,200 1994 0 14,450 3/ Southeast Alaska pink,chum, and sockeye Coho Chilkat River Directed MR,Calibr.SurveyNo goal New goal developed by Dec 2005 64,524 salmon between commercial net fisheries Fall Chum Chilkat River Directed M/R, AS No goal 309,520 3rd yr of mark-recapture program 5 AAC 33.367 Harvest and allocation of net caught salmon Pink Lynn Canal Index-Dist 15 Incidental AS No target 29,279 5 AAC 33.384 Lynn Canal and Chilkat R. king salmon fisheChinook Chilkat River Incidental M/R BEG Stock Recruit 1,750 to 3,500 1981 2003 0 3,422 5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon

Taku/Snett Gillnet 5 AAC 33.361United States - Canada salmon management Sockeye Taku River Directed M/R SEG Prof. Judgment 71,000 to 80,000 1986 0 108,000 (Dist 11) plan Sockeye Speel Lake Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 4,000 to 13,000 mid-1980s 1992 (5,000); in 2003 changed to range 0 7,863 5 AAC 33.363Management guidelines for allocating Chinook Taku River Directed M/R, CWT BEG Stock Recruit 30,000 to 55,000 1981 1985,1991, 2000 1 99 68,199 Reinstituted fishery in 2005 Southeast Alaska pink,chum, and sockeye Coho Taku River Directed M/R, CWT SEG Prof Judgment >38,000 1986 99(changed from range & raised) 0 132,405 salmon between commercial net fisheries Fall Chum Taku River Incidental Fish wheel No goal NA 5 AAC 33.367 Harvest and allocation of net caught salmon Pink Stephens Passage Index Incidental AS Man Obj. Partition BEG .14 to .32 million 1970 Rvwd in 03; revised along with BEG 2 95,00 179,855 5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon

5 AAC 33.361 Sockeye Tahltan Lake Sockeye (Stikine Ri Directed Weir BEG Stock Recruit 18,000 to 30,000 1987 1987 SEG (20-40,000); updated in 1993 6 97-02 63,310 Stikine/Sumner Strait United States - Canada salmon management Gillnet (Dist 106, 108) plan Sockeye Stikine River Mainstem Sockeye Directed Weir expansion SEG Prof. Judgment 20,000 to 40,000 1987 3 98-00 38,000 5 AAC 33.363Management guidelines for allocating Sockeye McDonald Lake Incidental Calibrated FS BEG Stock Recruit 65,000 to 85,000 1993 5 95-6,98,01-02 21,279 3/ Southeast Alaska pink,chum, and sockeye Chinook Stikine River Directed M/R, CWT BEG Stock Recruit 14,000 to 28,000 1981 1985,1991, 2000 0 48,900 Reinstituted fishery in 2005 salmon between commercial net fisheries Pink Southern Southeast Directed AS BEG Yield Analysis 4.0 to 9.0 million 197071(raised), 1980s(raised), 2003(widened) 0 8,496,491 5 AAC 33.367 Harvest and allocation of net caught salmon 5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon

Tree Pt Gillnet (Dist 1)5 AAC 33.361United States - Canada salmon management Sockeye Nass River (Canadian) Directed Interception plan Sockeye Skeena River (Canadian) Directed Interception 5 AAC 33.363Management guidelines for allocating Coho Hugh Smith Lake Directed Full Indicat StockBEG Stock Recruit 500, to 1,100 1994 0 840 Southeast Alaska pink,chum, and sockeye Coho Ketchikan Survey index (14 streamDirected AS No goal New goal developed by Dec 2005 9,904 salmon between commercial net fisheries Chum Fish Creek (Portland Canal) Incidental Calibrated FS No goal 91,000 5 AAC 33.367 Harvest and allocation of net caught salmon Pink Southern Southeast Directed AS BEG Yield Analysis 4.0 to 9.0 million 197071(raised), 1980s(raised), 2003(widened) 0 8,496,491 5 AAC 29.065 Allocation of Coho Salmon 5 AAC 33.360 District one pink salmon management plan

SE AlaskaHatchery Terminal 5 AAC 33.370District 1: Neets Bay Hatchery Salmon Chum SSRAA Harvest Fisheries Management Plan (HMP) Coho SSRAA

5AAC 33.371District 1: Carrol Inlet terminal Harvest Area Chinook SSRAA salmon managemenet plan (THMP).

5 AAC 33.372 District 1: Nakat Inlet THMP. Chum SSRAA Coho SSRAA

5 AAC 33.373 District 7: Eastern Passage THMP chinook SRAA chum SSRAA coho SSRAA

5 AAC 33.374 District 12: Hidden Falls THMP. chinook NSRAA chum NSRAA coho NSRAA

5 AAC 33.375District 13: Silver Bay (Mdevejie Creek chinook NSRAA Hatchery) HMP chum NSRAA

5 AAC 33.376 District 13: Deep Inlet THMP. chinook NSRAA chum NSRAA

5 AAC 33.377 District 2: Kendrick Bay THMP. chinook NSRAA chum NSRAA

5 AAC 33.378 District 11: Snettisham HMP. sockeye DIPAC

5 AAC 33.381 District 6: Wrangell Narrow-Blind Slough T chinook Crystal Lake Hatchery coho Crystal Lake Hatchery

5 AAC 33.383 District 7: Anita Bay THMP chinook SSRAA coho SSRAA chum SSRAA

5 AAC 33.385 Mist Cove THMP coho NSRAA

1/ BEG currently under review; not considered a Stock of Concern in 2003 due to low exploitation rate, health of nearby chinook runs and uncertainty with existing goal. 2/ Identified as Stock of Management Concern in 2003. Escapements in 2003 and 2004 were above the goal range. Board set OEG of 8-18,000 fish (wild+planted) for system. 3/ Goal under review 4/ No fishing has been directed on this stock for over a decade due to lack of market demand. 5/ Odd-year returns dominate these stock groups; little or no fishing is directed on these stocks during even-years unless a surplus is evident.