The Scientist: Hero Or Villain?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Scientist: Hero Or Villain? Intertext Volume 25 Issue 1 Article 9 2017 The Scientist: Hero or Villain? Charlotte Oestrich Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/intertext Part of the Nonfiction Commons Recommended Citation Oestrich, Charlotte (2017) "The Scientist: Hero or Villain?," Intertext: Vol. 25 : Iss. 1 , Article 9. Available at: https://surface.syr.edu/intertext/vol25/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Intertext by an authorized editor of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Oestrich: The Scientist: Hero or Villain? Charlotte Oestrich s prevalent as the scientist is in modern cinema and culture, depictions of the character A have not changed much since its earliest introduction. Sometimes good, but usually por- trayed as “mad,” scientists work to uncover the unknown and are not afraid to accept the con- sequences of their theories. As Christopher Frayling writes, the scientist is usually depicted as a “very intelligent [person]–a genius or almost a genius… [They know their] subject… [They are] prepared to work for years without getting results and face the possibility of failure with- INTERTEXT 2017 | 17 Published by SURFACE, 2017 1 Intertext, Vol. 25 [2017], Iss. 1, Art. 9 out discouragement; [They] will try again” ies of knowledge and styles of knowl- (12). When we are asked to describe a sci- edge. The gap has usually been filled by entist, our minds often move to stereotypical stereotypical representations of one depictions gathered from films; rarely do we kind or another. (11) consider how the nature of scientists’ experi- This gap between different types of knowl- ments and knowledge shapes their core iden- edge results in problematic representations tity. Many times, the public cannot explain of the scientist as the public attempts to the discoveries of scientists, but it appreciates make sense of what it does not understand. the work nonetheless. Our understanding of Put another way, the public makes up for scientists is socially constructed, often de- the knowledge it lacks with varying depic- pending on the knowledge they advance and tions—often stereotypes—of scientists that the value or threat we see in it. While the characterize their intentions in various ways. gap in knowledge between the public and Whether a contemplative natural philoso- the scientific community can create anxiet- pher, a potential hero, or a villain with an ies regarding the impact of technology, it can “obsessive desire to tamper with things that also lead scientists to be viewed as potential are best left alone,” a scientist, or at least our heroes or villains depending on the nature of notion of one, can be explained by under- their knowledge. standing different conceptions of knowl- As the character of the scientist remains edge: explanatory and exploratory (Frayling constant across time, anxieties about their 36). The anxieties associated with exploring seemingly God-like understanding of the scientific discoveries rather than explaining universe raise questions of whether they scientific knowledge have become prominent will use this knowledge for good or evil, and through the portrayal of the scientist in me- what will happen if their findings fall into dia. The characterization of the scientist as a the wrong hands. In Mad, Bad, and Dangerous? trustworthy hero or a threatening villain can The Scientist and the Cinema, Christopher be attributed to the public misconception Frayling explores the presence of the scien- of science and the subsequent marking of tist as the “unworldly saint” or “dotty sinner,” explanatory knowledge. While explanatory attributing this divergence to a gap in knowl- knowledge is perceived as positive because edge between the public and the scientific it cannot be read as potentially harmful, ex- community: ploratory knowledge is vilified because it can The gap between specialized knowl- lead to unknown consequences. edge and public understanding lies at Scientists are held on a high moral ground the root of most fictional cinematic rep- because of their above-average intelligence. resentations of the scientist—special- They possess the ability to understand con- ized knowledge in the restricted sense cepts beyond the capacities of the average of technical data, and in the broader individual, and they are therefore assumed sense of specialized ways of thinking to hold an ethical responsibility to ensure and specialized scientific communities that knowledge is not used for acts of evil. that legitimate the thinking as well: bod- In Screams of Reason, David Skal explains the 18 https://surface.syr.edu/intertext/vol25/iss1/9 2 Oestrich: The Scientist: Hero or Villain? infamous stereotypical characteristics of in daily life. It is difficult for many people to the scientist as a means of commenting on understand how these theories work, but that universal “themes and social issues,” which is part of the reason why the public viewed speak to the social and cultural concerns of the knowledge Einstein discovered positively. intelligence (3). He contends that the scien- When explanatory knowledge is released to tist has “served as a lightning rod for other- the public, the public uses what it doesn’t wise unbearable anxieties about the meaning understand to form a positive attitude to- of scientific thinking and the uses and conse- ward the scientist, assuming the work must quences of modern technology” (18). be good if so few can understand it and even Most anxieties regarding scientific think- fewer can make use of it. ing derive from a form of discovery knowl- However, questions regarding how the edge—knowledge that arises out of sheer scientific community expands its knowl- human curiosity, usually revolving around edge have raised concerns in regard to themes of changing humanity, breaking who should have access to that specialized the boundaries of the human body, going knowledge and for what reasons it can be against the laws of nature, and even poten- utilized. During the Cold War era, an un- tially destroying mankind. The difference told number of people feared the atom between a scientist’s explaining the laws of bomb and the risk of nuclear war. During the universe and exploring the capabilities of this time, many fictional portrayals of the the universe tends to lead the public to view scientist played up the fear of nuclear war. that scientist in a positive or negative light, For example, Dr. Strangelove and Dr. No differing between potential hero or potential represented scientists as villains who had villain. Public acceptance of and perspec- lost touch with humanity. More important, tive on scientists depend greatly on under- such anxieties are reflected in discussions of standing what they are trying to accomplish J. Robert Oppenheimer, head of the Man- with their experiments, which is a difficult hattan Project. Oppenheimer, credited with notion to grasp considering the gap between creating the atomic bomb, will forever hold public knowledge and that of the scientific a moral and technological burden due to community. his achieving scientific fame by “selling his The differences between explanatory and soul to the devil” in return for the ability to exploratory knowledge are most prevalent play God and use the power of the stars to when we examine the differing attitudes produce nuclear fission (Knust 129). Dur- toward the work of Albert Einstein and J. ing the early part of the twentieth century, Robert Oppenheimer on atoms. The public nuclear energy was a field not many scien- has accepted Einstein’s intelligence largely tists were comfortable exploring because because of the complicated and seemingly of the unprecedented harm that could be harmless nature of his work. The equation done if something went wrong. It was also E=mc² became a trademark of Einstein’s misunderstood by the public because of its work with atoms, though not many can ex- complicated and secret nature, and little was Layout by Kathryn Kawasoe. Opening spread: “Einstein” by Flickr user KylaBorg, CC by 2.0: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kylaborg/14052700066. 2.0: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kylaborg/14052700066. CC by Flickr “Einstein” by user KylaBorg, Opening spread: Kathryn Kawasoe. by Layout plain what it means or how it can be utilized done to bridge the gap between the scientific INTERTEXT 2017 | 19 Published by SURFACE, 2017 3 Intertext, Vol. 25 [2017], Iss. 1, Art. 9 community and the public. have had devious intentions related to the Since nuclear knowledge has often been pursuit of scientific discovery. Such anxiet- villainized since its creation, Oppenheimer’s ies have been reflected and amplified across “character” is that of a villain, primarily be- media because scientists are often portrayed cause he fulfills the role of the helpless sci- as having a nefarious curiosity and a taste entist who has “lost control either over [a] for disaster (Frayling 12). The quintessen- discovery…or, as frequently happens in war tial mad scientist, Victor Frankenstein, has times, over the direction of its implementa- been misunderstood and vilified because of tion” (Holderman 219). Rather than explor- his exploration into breaking the barriers ing the relations between atoms as Einstein of the human body and blurring the lines did, Oppenheimer explored the tangible ap- between life and death, both topics that fos- plication of this knowledge and, as a result, ter unease. cost over two hundred thousand people their In her 1818 novel, Mary Shelley introduc- lives and lost the public’s confidence (Frayling es Dr. Victor Frankenstein as a prominent 13). Although Oppenheimer would not have and respectable young scientist who develops used his discoveries to attack others, as the an obsession with finding the knowledge to fictional Dr. Strangelove or Dr. No would, animate matter. Dr. Frankenstein embodies he is nonetheless a villain due to his desire the scientist as an idealist “engaged in con- to toy with dangerous knowledge and his flict with a technology-based system that lack of help during its devastating utiliza- fails to provide for individual human values” tion.
Recommended publications
  • AP English Literature Required Reading
    Kerr High School AP English Literature Summer Reading 2019 Welcome to AP Literature! I’m fairly certain you are parched and thirsty for some juicy reading after a year of analyzing speeches and arguments, so let us jump right in. After months of deliberation and careful consideration, I have chosen several pieces from as far back as 429 BC Athens, to 1200 AD Scotland, venturing on to Africa 1800s, and finishing up in 20th century Chicago. Grab your literary passport and join me as we meet various tragic heroes and discover their tragic flaws and tragic mistakes. You will learn the difference between an Aristotelian tragic hero and a Shakespearean tragic hero, not to mention gain a whole bunch of insight into the human condition and learn some ancient Greek in the process. I made sure each piece is available in PDF online. If you choose to use the online documents, be certain you are able to annotate and have quick access to the annotated text for class discussions. The only AP 4 summer writing you will do is five reading record cards. Four of your reading record cards could include all of the required summer reading pieces. It is my expectation that you earnestly read, annotate, and ponder each of the required pieces and be ready to launch into discussion after your summer reading exam. Heavily annotated notes on the four attached tragic hero articles and your handwritten reading record cards will count as one major grade and are due Thursday, August 15, by 3:00 pm. Instructions for the reading record cards are attached.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Sacred Value Networks Within an Evolutionary, Adversarial Game
    J Stat Phys (2013) 151:673–688 DOI 10.1007/s10955-012-0678-4 The Effects of Sacred Value Networks Within an Evolutionary, Adversarial Game Scott G. McCalla · Martin B. Short · P. Jeffrey Brantingham Received: 24 August 2012 / Accepted: 14 December 2012 / Published online: 11 January 2013 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 Abstract The effects of personal relationships and shared ideologies on levels of crime and the formation of criminal coalitions are studied within the context of an adversarial, evo- lutionary game first introduced in Short et al. (Phys. Rev. E 82:066114, 2010). Here, we interpret these relationships as connections on a graph of N players. These connections are then used in a variety of ways to define each player’s “sacred value network”—groups of individuals that are subject to special consideration or treatment by that player. We explore the effects on the dynamics of the system that these networks introduce, through various forms of protection from both victimization and punishment. Under local protection, these networks introduce a new fixed point within the game dynamics, which we find through a continuum approximation of the discrete game. Under more complicated, extended protec- tion, we numerically observe the emergence of criminal coalitions, or “gangs”. We also find that a high-crime steady state is much more frequent in the context of extended protection networks, in both the case of Erdos-Rényi˝ and small world random graphs. Keywords Crime dynamics · Sacred values · Evolutionary game theory 1 Introduction The members of gangs and insurgent networks—which we shall simply refer to as “criminals”—are usually well known within their local communities, and are often shel- tered from authorities by non-criminal community members.
    [Show full text]
  • Paladin Rising Paladins Are Warriors Who Are Sworn to Uphold the Cause of Good
    Paladin Rising Paladins are warriors who are sworn to uphold the cause of Good. It is the dream of every paladin to transcend this corrupt world and become a demigod. During this Journey to Ascension, a paladin will face many moral dilemmas, for things are never as they seem. This is a game about good people who do bad things.You are tightly bound by your oath to never do evil. The more good things you do, the higher you rise. The more evil things you do, the faster you fall. As a paladin, you will be thrown into morally obnoxious situations where you must avoid doing evil at all costs. Concoct a plan on the edge of logical absurdity. Get someone else’s hands dirty. Whatever it takes. As long as you didn’t technically do anything wrong, you’ll be in the clear. Character Creation Holy Points (HP): Each paladin begins play with four Holy Points. Holy Points are the core of this game. When a paladin performs a good deed, regardless of intention, he gains a number of Holy Points. When a paladin performs an evil deed, regardless of intention, he loses some Holy Points. When a paladin’s HP falls below zero, he falls from grace and loses his status as a paladin, along with all of his paladin powers. He can only be redeemed by going on an Apology Quest. If a paladin obtains twelve Holy Points, he becomes a demigod. Skills: Skills indicate what a paladin is good at. A paladin has 24 skill points to allocate to his skills as he sees fit.
    [Show full text]
  • Villains – the Necessary Evil? Capt
    PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Villains – The Necessary Evil? Capt. Chris Quaid, USAF • Capt. Dan Ward, USAF fter exploring the removable component of topic of heroics what make these actors vil- (Program Man- lains in the first place. ager, Sept.-Dec. 2003), it seemed The Evil Genius Aonly natural to investigate This type of villain is intent the flip side—villainy. Just on domination and con- as heroes and heroines are trol: Darth Vader, Cruella essential to organizational DeVil, Superman’s Lex success, so too, villains, bad Luthor, and Adolf Hitler. Al- guys, enemies, and mon- though they are often ex- sters play an important role ternal to an organization, in the plotlines of our orga- PMs sometimes encounter nizational dramas. the Evil Genius within their organizations, typically in According to the late Army a different division. Col. Frank B. Shutts, founder and owner of the Evil Geniuses always have Miami Herald, “One very an Evil Plan, and their pri- important ingredient of suc- mary weakness is their ar- cess is a good, wide-awake, rogant overconfidence in persistent, tireless enemy.” that plan. Arrogance is al- Since villains are so signifi- most never useful, and cant, program managers when exercised to a vil- would do well to under- lainous degree, it makes in- stand the types of villains herent weaknesses and they may encounter and flaws virtually invisible to the various contributions of their owner. Evil Geniuses those villains to program- cannot comprehend that matic success. The most their Evil Plans might be fortunate and effective PMs flawed, nor can they en- will square off against a persistent arch enemy who is tertain the possibility of a fatal weakness in their own abil- strong enough to be a challenge—and flawed enough to ities.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Macbeth a Tragic Hero?
    Is Macbeth a Tragic Hero? Lesson Transcript This lesson will cover the reason why Macbeth from Shakespeare's famous play, ''Macbeth'', is a debated tragic hero. We'll explore the argument that shows he is a tragic hero by proving his stature and greatness, his tragic aw, and his downfall. What Makes a Tragic Hero? Many of us encounter the tragic hero in popular movies and ction. Sometimes, that hero is even considered a villain. The well-known Godfather trilogy follows hero and sometimes villain Michael Corleone on his journey through (1) _____. Michael is born into a powerful family, is awed by his ambition, and is left broken and alone after the deaths of his family members. This makes him a tragic hero, or a character of noble birth who has qualities the audience can (2) _____ with, but who also has aws and is fated to doom. The roots of these characters stem from Shakespeare's plays written hundreds of years ago, which is why it's important for us to study them today. The Argument for the Tragic Hero Many scholars see Macbeth as a villain instead of a hero because of his vile actions. But, a (3) _____ can be either a protagonist or an (4) _____. The key is that the audience can empathize with the character. Look again at the example of Michael Corleone. Many of us do not approve of mob violence and crime, but we can empathize with Michael when he loses his family members. The same can be said for Macbeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Aka a Generic Medieval Fantasy World
    Gragyriss, Captor of Princesses Jump By Cthulhu Fartagn Welcome, Jumper, to Gragyriss, Captor of Princesses! ...aka a generic medieval fantasy world. With a dragon. Yeah, there really isn't anything special about this place, or even anybody here. And the 'plot' as it were, is just the dragon's attempts to catch some princesses. So, uh. Have 1000 cp and have fun? Origins Look, I'll be honest. All I would normally have is 'dragon' and 'not dragon'. So, you get some location based perk discounts as well. Dragon ...yes, you are a dragon now. A baby one. Who maybe hasn’t even hatched yet. By the time you’re fully grown, you could probably roast a man in one breath, and would be as big as several horses. Not terribly impressive, but neither is this world. Princess You are now royalty, however minor it may be. Or perhaps it might be better to simply call yourself nobility. You can, in fact, be male if you so wish, but for simplicity's sake, and to not confuse and infuriate the inevitable kidnapping dragon, please be female? Other Exactly what it says on the tin. You are not a Dragon. Or a Princess. Instead, you are irrelevant. ...Okay, that’s not quite what I meant, but given there’s at least one Dragon with a divine blessing, I’m fairly certain that makes anyone out to try and kill said dragon the villain. Age & Gender Age is free choice between 15 and 30 or so, and gender is the same as your last jump.
    [Show full text]
  • Archetypes Stock Characters (PDF)
    STOCK CHARACTERS Shakespeare, as an heir to the Commedia Del-Arte tradition, in which the play’s message is communicated largely through easily recognizable or even stereotypical characters, employs many of “stock” characters throughout his works. Once you look at their basic characteristics, it is easy to identify them across the Shakespearean canon. This identification of characters can make understanding an unfamiliar text a little easier – because the characters in a particular category behave in similar ways, and may even speak using similar rhetorical, image or verse structure. LOVERS ● Ingenue (female): Innocent, sweet, youthful, honorable ● Sobrette (female): Not-so-innocent, not-so-young, usually honorable, witty, likes banter and argument ● Rustic/ Rude (Male and Female): country born and bred, simple, agrarian, earthy. ● Noble (Male): born of nobility, high-born, generally honest COMPANIONS ● Councilors (Male or Female): faithful, honest, convey messages, have information, confidantes. ● Bawds (Female): worldly, saucy, dispense advice, maternal with an edge. ● Mentors (Male): fatherly, give advice, supply the hero with the means to pursue their desire. AUTHORITY FIGURES AND SOLDIERS ● In Control (male): authoritative, most times fair, peripheral to plot, initiate or resolve conflict. ● In Distress (male or female): strong, noble, comprised by circumstance or bad decisions/advice, decisive, often with a flaw of temperament. RELUCTANT HEROES ● Rakes & Cads (male): Walk the line between good and bad but usually turn out good,witty, bawdy, seductive, hot-tempered, loyal but independent. COMIC CHARACTERS ● The Wit: Language based humor, somewhat noble, melancholy. ● The Clown: Physical comic, jester, paid to be amusing, singer. ● The Fool: situational comic, dim-witted, unaware of being a fool.
    [Show full text]
  • Villains, Victims, and Heroes in Character Theory and Affect Control
    Social Psychology Quarterly 00(0) 1–20 Villains, Victims, and Heroes Ó American Sociological Association 2018 DOI: 10.1177/0190272518781050 in Character Theory and journals.sagepub.com/home/spq Affect Control Theory Kelly Bergstrand1 and James M. Jasper2 Abstract We examine three basic tropes—villain, victim, and hero—that emerge in images, claims, and narratives. We compare recent research on characters with the predictions of an established tradition, affect control theory (ACT). Combined, the theories describe core traits of the vil- lain-victim-hero triad and predict audiences’ reactions. Character theory (CT) can help us understand the cultural roots of evaluation, potency, and activity profiles and the robustness of profile ratings. It also provides nuanced information regarding multiplicity in, and sub- types of, characters and how characters work together to define roles. Character types can be strategically deployed in political realms, potentially guiding strategies, goals, and group dynamics. ACT predictions hold up well, but CT suggests several paths for extension and elaboration. In many cases, cultural research and social psychology work on parallel tracks, with little cross-talk. They have much to learn from each other. Keywords affect control theory, character theory, heroes, victims, villains On October 9, 2012, 15-year-old Malala including one attack in December 2014 Yousafzai went to school, despite the Tali- that killed 132 schoolchildren and another ban’s intense campaign to stop female in January 2016 where 22 people were education in her region of Pakistan and gunned down at a university. Why did despite its death threats against her and Malala’s story touch Western audiences, her father.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 "What Is a Tragic Hero?" According to Aristotle, the Function of Tragedy Is
    1 "What is a Tragic Hero?" According to Aristotle, the function of tragedy is to arouse pity and fear in the audience so that we may be purged, or cleansed, of these unsettling emotions. Aristotle's term for this emotional purging is the Greek word catharsis. Although no one is exactly sure what Aristotle meant by catharsis, it seems clear that he was referring to that strangely pleasurable sense of emotional release we experience after watching a great tragedy. For some reason, we usually feel exhilarated, not depressed, at the end. According to Aristotle, a tragedy can arouse these twin emotions of pity and fear only if it presents a certain type of hero, who is neither completely good nor completely bad. Aristotle also says that the tragic hero should be someone "highly renowned and prosperous," which is Aristotle's day meant a member of royalty. Why not an ordinary working person? we might ask. The answer is simply that the hero must fall from tremendous good fortune. Otherwise, we wouldn't feel such pity and fear. the change of fortune presented must not be the spectacle of a virtuous man brought from prosperity to adversity: For this moves neither pity nor fear; it merely shocks us. Nor again, that of a bad man passing from adversity to prosperity: For nothing can be more alien to the spirit of tragedy; . it neither satisfied the moral sense nor calls forth pity or fear. Nor, again, should the downfall of the utter villain be exhibited. A plot of this kind would, doubtless, satisfy the moral sense, but it would inspire neither pity nor fear; for pity is aroused by unmerited misfortune, fear by the misfortune of a man like ourselves .
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Characters of Melodrama
    What is MELODRAMA? ‘A play full of extravagant action and emotion’ Research Melodrama Complete the following tasks: • Watch a clip of Melodrama on YouTube and write five comments about what you saw. • Collect at least five pictures that show Melodrama in action. • Read about Melodrama and write down five facts you’ve learnt. What is Melodrama? A play characterised by stereotypical characters, exaggerated emotions, and simple conflict. A play marked by "good guys" vs. "bad guys“. A play which provides much action, suspense and tension but contains the conventional "happy ending." Originally a term for musical theatre. By the nineteenth century the meaning changed to describe a suspenseful drama featuring all-good heroes and all-bad villains. Stock Characters of Melodrama • ‘Types’ rather than believable, well-rounded characters. • Over the top, exaggerated characters. • Similar to pantomime characters. Let’s look at these characters more closely • Watch the clip on the slide below and make notes on what you observe. • Look for more examples on YouTube – see what you can find! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npfi0UZL2ow Noble Hero Falls for the heroine. Defeats the villain. Brave and strong. Cold-blooded villain Evil without cause. Wants to be with the heroine. Schemes and plots. Controlled by the Villain and not very bright. Long suffering heroine Pure and innocent. Has had a difficult life. Finds happiness at the end. Comic Character Lower class. Tries to help the hero/heroine. Well-meaning but not very bright. Cruel Stepmother Doesn’t like her step daughter. Bossy and controlling. Schemes with the villain. Weak Father Not very confident.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is a SUPERHERO?
    Song Bird Series by Karen Tyrrell Name __________________________ Who is a SUPERHERO? Draw yourself being a kind superhero Name some Superheroes________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ What kind things can Superheroes do? _______________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ What personality traits do Superheroes have?____________________ ________________________________________________________________ How do Superheroes help people?______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ How can you be an everyday superhero at school? ________________________________________________________________ At home? ______________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ © www.KarenTyrrell.com Song Bird Series 2018 Song Bird Series by Karen Tyrrell Name______________________________ Create a Superhero …Creative Writing Draw your Superhero What’s your Superhero’s name? ___________________________ What powers does your Superhero have? ______________________ What does your Superhero look like? ____________________________ What SUPER foods does your Superhero eat? _____________________________________________________________ Who does your Superhero rescue? __________________________ Who is your Superhero’s arch enemy? ___________________________ Write a story how your superhero battles with his enemy OR how he/she
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Touch of Zen Press Kit (PDF)
    presents In director King Hu’s grandest work, the noblewoman Yang (Hsu Feng), a fugitive hiding in a small village, must escape into the wilderness with a shy scholar and two aides. There, the quartet face a massive group of fighters, and are joined by a band of Buddhist monks who are surprisingly skilled in the art of battle. Janus Films is proud to present the original, uncut version of this classic in a sparkling new 4K restoration. “ The visual style will set your eyes on fire.” —Time Out London “ Truly spectacular.” —A. H. Weiler, The New York Times © 1971 Union Film Co., Ltd. / © 2015 Taiwan Film Institute. All rights reserved. janusfilms.com/hu “ An amazing and unique director.” —Ang Lee Taiwan • 1971 • 180 minutes • Color • Monaural In Mandarin with English subtitles • 2.35:1 aspect ratio Screening format: 4K DCP CREDITS Director/Scriptwriter: King Hu Starring: Producers: Sha Jung-feng, Hsu Feng as Yang Huizhen Hsia-wu Liang Fang Shi Jun as Gu Shengzhai Cinematographer: Hua Huiying Bai Ying as General Shih Editors: King Hu, Wen-chaio Wang Chin-chen Music: Wu Dajiang Martial arts choreographers: Han Yingjie, Pan Yao-kun Booking Inquiries: Janus Films Press Contact: Ryan Werner [email protected] • 212-756-8761 [email protected] • 917-254-7653 WUXIA: A PRIMER Although in the West most often applied to film, the term wuxia—literally “martial [wu] hero [xia]”—in fact refers to a genre of Chinese fiction that is represented in every medium, from literature to opera to, of course, movies. Dating back to 300 BCE in its protean form, the wuxia narrative traditionally follows a hero from the lower class without official affiliation who pursues righteousness and/or revenge while adhering to a code of chivalrous behavior.
    [Show full text]