Cx.S' V\P O R323

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cx.S' V\P O R323 Mir ismir cx.s' v\P o r323 GiiNI FO LT-N ETAT 1/(t eve" 1/51 AG Fl IC 4 5 LTU RAI_ E.C 0 N 0 t.f. C-Fi: FIT,/ AGRICULTURAL ADMINISTRATION (RESEARCH AND EXTENSION) NETWORI NETWORK PAPER 42 ISSN 0952-2468 %mum. July 1993 ROLES FOR FARMERS' KNOWLEDGE IN AFRICA Two Papers by: C R Riches, L J Shamon, J W M Logan and D C Munthali and Simon Batterbury Charles Riches, Louise Shaxson and J W M Logan are weed scientist, agricultural economist and entomologist respectively at the Natural Resources Institute, and can be contacted at: Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK D C Munthali is Director of the Soil Pests Project at the University of Malawi, and can be contacted at: Soil Pests Project, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, PO Box 280, Zomba, Malawi Simon Batterbury worked with Cellule Recherche-Developpement,PATECORE (GTZ), BP 271, Kongoussi, Barn, Burkina Faso. He can currently be contacted at: West London Institute of Higher Education, Geography Department, Gordon House, 300 St Margaret's Road, Twickenham, Middlesex TW1 1PT Network Personnel: Coordinator: Anthony Bebbington Assistant Coordinator: John Farrington Secretary: Alison Saxby This Network is sponsored by: The Overseas Development Administration (ODA) 94 Victoria Street, London SW1E 5JL The opinions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of ODA. Photocopies of all or part of this publication may be made providing that due acknowledgement is made. Requests for large-scale reproduction of network material should be directed to ODI as copyright holders. The Network Coordinator would appreciate receiving details of any use of this material in training, research or programme design, implementation or evaluation. CONTENTS Page 42a. Insect and Parasitic Weed Problems in Southern Malawi and the Use of Farmer Knowledge in the Design of Control Measures by C R Riches, L J Shaxson, J IV M Logan and D C Munthali ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE THREE PESTS 3 Striga asiatica: witchweed 3 Cylas puncticollis Boheman: the sweet potato weevil 4 Ophiomyia spp.: the beanfly 4 COLLECTING INFORMATION: HOW FARMER PERCEPTIONS OF PESTS CAN COMPLEMENT FIELD DATA 5 A FRAMEWORK FOR EXAMINING FARMER KNOWLEDGE 5 FARMER KNOWLEDGE OF PEST BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY 7 Farmer knowledge of Striga biology 7 Farmer knowledge of the biology of the sweet potato weevil 11 Farmer knowledge of the biology of the beanfly 11 PLANNING A PROGRAMME OF ADAPTIVE RESEARCH: THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF INDIGENOUS TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE 12 A programme for Striga control 12 Programmes for insect control 13 Page EMPOWERMENT THROUGH INFORMATION 14 REFERENCES 15 Figure 1. Four Classes of Farmer Knowledge 6 42b. Planners or Performers? Indigenous Dryland Farmers in Northern Burkina Faso by Simon Batterbury ABSTRACT 18 A BACKDROP TO INDIGENOUS AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION: 19 INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITY IN THE CENTRAL PLATEAU THE CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT OF DRYLAND FARMING SYSTEMS 20 INDIVIDUALITY, DESIGN CHOICE AND LEARNING IN MOSSI COMMUNITIES 92 PLANNED PERFORMANCES AND FARMER STATUS 24 CONCLUSIONS - RECOGNISING MULTIPLE SOURCES OF CHANGE IN ITK 26 ' REFERENCES 29 INSECT AND PARASITIC WEED PROBLEMS IN SOUTHERN MALAWI AND THE USE OF FARMER KNOWLEDGE IN THE DESIGN OF CONTROL MEASURES' C R Riches, L J Shaxson, J W M Logan and D C Munthali ABSTRACT Researchers worked with a group of farmers in Southern Malawi to find out what farmers know about witchweed (Striga asiatica), the sweet potato weevil (Cylas puncticollis) and the beanfly (Ophiomyia spp.) and how this affects the ways in which a control programme could be implemented. Although some relationships between pest problems and other factors such as soil fertility were generally well recognised by the farming community, the farmers contacted by this project lacked some of the detailed biological and ecological knowledge that is necessary for an understanding of why, certain control practices are necessary. These gaps in their understanding have a direct bearing on farmers' current approaches to control. The authors conclude that providing farmers with this information is essential if the control technologies being developed are to be sustainable. INTRODUCTION There is an increasing awareness of the contribution of indigenous technical knowledge to agricultural research. Farmers' understanding of their environment and their agricultural practices have been documented since (for example) the colonial era in Africa (see Richards, 1985, chapter 1). However, its potential contribution was not brought into the mainstream of development thinking until The Soil Pests Project at the University of Malawi is funded by the Overseas Development Administration through the Natural Resources and Environment Departinent's support to the Integrated Pest Management programme at NRI. However, opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of NRI, nor of ODA. The authors would like to thank Mr R L Satifula for his contribution to gathering information on farmer knowledge. 1 the rise of the "farmer first" movement that began with Richards, Rhoades and Chambers in the mid-1980s. Farmers may well, be more familiar with various aspects of the farming environment than the "experts" called in to assist them. Current literature is full of descriptions of farmers' intricate knowledge of different aspects of agricultural production. Farmers in Malawi intercrop in a multitude of patterns according to the particular micro-environment; growing "certain beans on old anthills, or certain crops cross-hatched with others, or in patches where the soil was of different quality" (Peters et a/., p.28). They have a detailed knowledge of the uses of indigenous plants for food and medicine (see Williamson, 1955, amongst others) and there is a growing number of reports of how farmers are continuously experimenting and improving their knowledge of the system in which they operate (see Chambers et al.). Chambers (1991) has observed that farmers know some things that scientists do not know while scientists know some things that farmers do not. To date, documentation of farmer knowledge has often been uncritical in that it tends to concentrate on aspects of agriculture about which farmers appear to know more than researchers. Less work has been done on what farmers do not know about particular problems. Bentley (1989) points out that "what farmers don't know can't help them": we must critically examine the gaps in knowledge of both farmers and scientists, to work out how they affect the development of sustainable agricultural technologies. This paper draws on the experience of the authors in working with the Soil Pests Project, based at Chancellor College at the University of Malawi. Three years of data collection, by both social and natural scientists, has given useful insights into how farmers' knowledge of the major pest problems can complement that of research scientists. However, we have found that for various reasons, farmers are unaware of some of the important biological and ecological features of the three key pests. These gaps in their understanding directly relate to the approaches they have used to date to control these pests. Witchweed, beanfly and the sweet potato weevil are all recognised by farmers in Southern Malawi to be major causes of yield loss. Witchweed infestation is closely associated with population pressure. Farmers in affected areas have few resources to commit to crop production and protection. It is therefore imperative that the design of control measures for this and any other crop "pest" is based on a clear understanding of farmer constraints and their knowledge of the biology of the problem. Where innovative control measures are developed, parallel research should be carried out to determine the additional knowledge farmers will need to understand how these work. Our aim is to develop an adaptive research programme for pest control and to identify what farmers need to be taught if they are to appreciate the rationale of, and hence be likely to adopt, appropriate control measures. We believe that without this step, sustained adoption of extension recommendations is unlikely. INTRODUCTION TO THE THREE PESTS Striga asiatica: witchweed Parasitic weeds in the genera Alectra and Striga (Scrophulariaceae) are now widespread constraints to cereal and grain legume production in much of Africa. According to Mboob (1989), Striga species are distributed throughout 40% of the arable land in sub-Saharan regions. On the basis of an analysis of recent surveys and field trials in a number of countries Sauerborn (1991) concluded that "Striga represents, at this time, the largest single biological constraint for the food production in Africa". Due to the difficulty of preparing Striga-free plots for valid comparisons there are few reliable estimates of crop loss due to parasitic weeds although Parker (1991) concludes that Striga species can cause complete crop failure and that losses of 30-50% are common under heavy infestations, with losses averaging 5-15%. It is not unusual for farmers in southern Africa to abandon severely infested land or to adopt a different cropping pattern to overcome the problem (Riches et al., 1986). Increased severity of Striga is generally associated with continuous cropping which has replaced shifting cultivation systems as a consequence of population pressure in many regions where these parasites are endemic (Parker 1991). This is due in part to the association of Striga infestation with low fertility.
Recommended publications
  • Combined Control of Striga Hermonthica and Stemborers by Maize–Desmodium Spp
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Crop Protection 25 (2006) 989–995 www.elsevier.com/locate/cropro Combined control of Striga hermonthica and stemborers by maize–Desmodium spp. intercrops Zeyaur R. Khana,Ã, John A. Pickettb, Lester J. Wadhamsb, Ahmed Hassanalia, Charles A.O. Midegaa aInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi 00100, Kenya bBiological Chemistry Division, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK Accepted 4 January 2006 Abstract The African witchweed (Striga spp.) and lepidopteran stemborers are two major biotic constraints to the efficient production of maize in sub-Saharan Africa. Previous studies had shown the value of intercropping maize with Desmodium uncinatum in the control of both pests. The current study was conducted to assess the potential role of other Desmodium spp., adapted to different agro-ecologies, in combined control of both pests in Kenya. Treatments consisted of intercropped plots of a Striga hermonthica- and stemborer-susceptible maize variety and one Desmodium sp. or cowpea, with a maize monocrop plot included as a control. S. hermonthica counts and stemborer damage to maize plants were significantly reduced in maize–desmodium intercrops (by up to 99.2% and 74.7%, respectively) than in a maize monocrop and a maize–cowpea intercrop. Similarly, maize plant height and grain yields were significantly higher (by up to 103.2% and 511.1%, respectively) in maize–desmodium intercrops than in maize monocrops or maize–cowpea intercrops. These results confirmed earlier findings that intercropping maize with D. uncinatum effectively suppressed S. hermonthica and stemborer infestations in maize resulting in higher crop yields.
    [Show full text]
  • Striga (Witchweeds) in Sorghum and Millet: Knowledge and Future Research Needs
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ICRISAT Open Access Repository Striga (Witchweeds) in Sorghum and Millet: Knowledge and Future Research Needs A. T. Obilana 1 and K.V. Ramaiah 2 Abstract Striga spp (witchweeds), are notorious root hemiparasites on cereal and legume crops grown in the semi-arid tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, the southern Arabian Peninsula, India, and parts of the eastern USA. These weed-parasites cause between 5 to 90% losses in yield; total crop- loss data have been reported. Immunity in hosts has not been found. Past research activities and control methods for Striga are reviewed, with emphasis on the socioeconomic significance of the species. Striga research involving biosystematics, physiological biochemistry, cultural and chemical control methods, and host resistance are considered. We tried to itemize research needs of priority and look into the future of Striga research and control In light of existing information, some control strategies which particularly suit subsistence and emerging farmers' farming systems with some minor adjustments are proposed. The authors believe that a good crop husbandry is the key to solving the Striga problem. Introduction 60%), susceptibility (in about 30%), and resis- tance (in about 10%). On the other hand, in Striga species (witchweeds) are parasitic weeds maize, susceptibility has been the common reac- growing on the roots of cereal and legume crops tion as resistant varieties are still being identi- in dry, semi-arid, and harsh environments of fied and confirmed. The reaction of millet is tropical and subtropical Africa, Arabian Penin- complex, with ecological zone implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Witchweed Eradication Program in North and South Carolina
    United States Department of Agriculture Witchweed Eradication Marketing and Regulatory Program in North and Programs South Carolina Environmental Assessment, April 2020 Witchweed Eradication Program in North and South Carolina Environmental Assessment, April 2020 Agency Contact: Anne Lebrun Policy Manager Plant Protection and Quarantine, Plant Health Programs Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 60 Riverdale, MD 20737–1232 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program,or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Wild Angiosperms of Bhagwan Mahavir (Molem
    Check List 9(2): 186–207, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Check List of Wild Angiosperms of Bhagwan Mahavir PECIES S OF Mandar Nilkanth Datar 1* and P. Lakshminarasimhan 2 ISTS L (Molem) National Park, Goa, India *1 CorrespondingAgharkar Research author Institute, E-mail: G. [email protected] G. Agarkar Road, Pune - 411 004. Maharashtra, India. 2 Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P. O. Botanic Garden, Howrah - 711 103. West Bengal, India. Abstract: Bhagwan Mahavir (Molem) National Park, the only National park in Goa, was evaluated for it’s diversity of Angiosperms. A total number of 721 wild species belonging to 119 families were documented from this protected area of which 126 are endemics. A checklist of these species is provided here. Introduction in the National Park are Laterite and Deccan trap Basalt Protected areas are most important in many ways for (Naik, 1995). Soil in most places of the National Park area conservation of biodiversity. Worldwide there are 102,102 is laterite of high and low level type formed by natural Protected Areas covering 18.8 million km2 metamorphosis and degradation of undulation rocks. network of 660 Protected Areas including 99 National Minerals like bauxite, iron and manganese are obtained Parks, 514 Wildlife Sanctuaries, 43 Conservation. India Reserves has a from these soils. The general climate of the area is tropical and 4 Community Reserves covering a total of 158,373 km2 with high percentage of humidity throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Witchweed Call Biosecurity Queensland Immediately on 13 25 23 If You See This Species
    Prohibited invasive plant Red witchweed Call Biosecurity Queensland immediately on 13 25 23 if you see this species Red witchweed (Striga asiatica) • It is illegal to keep, cultivate, transport or sell red witchweed in Queensland. • Grows 5–40 cm high and attaches to roots of a ‘host’ plant. • Flowers are 5–20 mm in diameter and are usually red, but can be white, yellow or pink. • Leaves are arranged in opposite pairs along the stem. Leaves are 6–40 mm long and 1–4 mm wide and have a tapered pointed tip. • The calyx (a cup like structure at the base of the flower) has 10 ribs. Native species of witchweed have calyces with five ribs. • Seeds are very small and remain viable in the soil for up to 15 years. • Early detection helps protect Queensland’s agricultural industries and natural environment. Red witchweed found near Mackay Biosecurity Queensland has confirmed a serious exotic pest, red witchweed, has been found on a small number of properties near Mackay. A surveillance program has been established by Biosecurity Queensland to determine spread of the invasive plant. Control measures to reduce the risk of further spread have been put in place. Producers in Mackay are being urged to check their crops for red witchweed. If you suspect you have this plant on your property, report it immediately to Biosecurity Queensland on 13 25 23. Description Red witchweed is a parasitic plant that grows attached to the roots of a ‘host’ plant. It robs its host of water and nutrients, suppressing its growth and causing chlorosis, wilting and in some cases, death.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Invasive Potential of 10 Parasitic Witchweeds and Related Orobanchaceae
    Global Invasive Potential of 10 Parasitic Witchweeds and Related Orobanchaceae Item Type Article Authors Mohamed, Kamal I.; Papes, Monica; Williams, Richard; Benz, Brett W.; Peterson, A. Townsend Citation Mohamed, K.I., Papes, M., Williams, R.A.J., Benz, B.W., Peterson, A.T. (2006) 'Global invasive potential of 10 parasitic witchweeds and related Orobanchaceae'. Ambio, 35(6), pp. 281-288. DOI: 10.1579/05-R-051R.1 DOI 10.1579/05-R-051R.1 Publisher Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Journal Ambio Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States Download date 30/09/2021 07:19:18 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10545/623714 Report Kamal I. Mohamed, Monica Papes, Richard Williams, Brett W. Benz and A. Townsend Peterson Global Invasive Potential of 10 Parasitic Witchweeds and Related Orobanchaceae S. gesnerioides (Willd.) Vatke occurs throughout Africa, The plant family Orobanchaceae includes many parasitic perhaps thanks to its ability to develop host-specific strains, weeds that are also impressive invaders and aggressive each with a narrow host range. Indeed, Mohamed et al. (2) crop pests with several specialized features (e.g. micro- described eight host-specific strains, the most economically scopic seeds, parasitic habits). Although they have important being those attacking cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) provoked several large-scale eradication and control efforts, no global evaluation of their invasive potential is Walp.) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Other strains are as yet available. We use tools from ecological niche reported on diverse wild dicot plants of no commercial value, modeling in combination with occurrence records from including a strain found in the southeastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Witch Weeds (Striga Species)
    Invasive plant risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Witchweeds AeStriga spp. Steve Csurhes, Anna Markula and Yuchan Zhou First published 2013 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Front cover: An area of corn (maize) that has been severely stunted by Striga (in Africa) Photo: CIMMYT undated, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center – used with permission under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) Invasive plant risk assessment: Witchweeds Striga species 2 Contents Summary 4 Introduction 5 Identity and taxonomy 5 Description 6 Reproduction and dispersal 8 Origin and distribution 9 Preferred habitat 10 History as a weed elsewhere 11 Pest potential in Queensland 14 Current distribution and impact in Queensland and Australia 14 Potential impact in Queensland 15 Control 18 References 18 Invasive plant risk assessment: Witchweeds Striga species 3 Summary The genus Striga comprises at least 30 species (the exact number of species is unclear due to taxonomic uncertainty). Three species, Striga hermonthica, S. asiatica and S. gesnerioides, are among the world’s worst weeds.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Control Striga and Stemborer in Maize Alternative Ways of Controlling Striga and Stemborer How Does a ‘Push-Pull’ System Work?
    CTA Practical Guide Series, No. 2 CTA Practical Guide Series, No. 2 CTA Practical Guide Series, No. 2 CTA Practical Guide Series, No. 2 Stop the spread of Striga For more information contact: Case study Striga Striga seeds are very small, like dust, and can easily be carried between fields. Avoid spreading Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MoARD) How to control We are in western Kenya not far from Lake Victoria. The small maize field in front of us Striga by taking these precautions: looks dreadful: the plants are only one metre high, the leaves yellow and full of holes, P. O. Box 62347, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia there are almost no cobs but there are plenty of plants with beautiful pinkish-purple Tel: +251-11-538134 Striga spread by Action flowers. Close by, Mrs Ouzo, the owner of this field, shows us another maize field. Here and stemborer in maize Maize or sorghum seed Collect maize cobs or sorghum heads to save seed the plants are over two metres high, with dark green leaves, healthy cobs and there are National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) contaminated with Striga directly from the growing plant very few of the pink-flowered plants. She explains that it is the same maize variety in both Plot 39A Lumumba Avenue, 2nd Floor Mukwasi House, Nakasero, Uganda fields, planted on exactly the same day. seeds P. O. Box 25235, Kampala, Uganda Do not drop the cobs or seed heads on the soil or thresh Tel: +256-41-345440/345065/345066, Fax: +256-41-347843 them in fields infested with Striga The difference between the two fields is striking.
    [Show full text]
  • Push-Pull: Chemical Ecology-Based Integrated Pest Management Technology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Online Research @ Cardiff Push-Pull: Chemical Ecology-Based Integrated Pest Management Technology 1 1 2 2 Zeyaur Khan & Charles A. O. Midega & Antony Hooper & John Pickett Abstract Lepidopterous stemborers, and parasitic striga weeds smallholder mixed cropping systems in Africa. Adopted by belonging to the family Orobanchaceae, attack cereal crops in about 125,000 farmers to date in eastern Africa, it effectively sub-Saharan Africa causing severe yield losses. The smallholder addresses major production constraints, significantly increases farmers are resource constrained and unable to afford expensive maize yields, and is economical as it is based on locally avail- chemicals for crop protection. The push–pull technology, a able plants, not expensive external inputs. chemical ecology- based cropping system, is developed for in- . tegrated pest and weed management in cereal–livestock farming Keywords Cereal crops Stemborer pests Parasitic systems. Appropriate plants were selected that naturally emit . striga Semiochemicals Allelopathy signaling chemicals (semiochemicals). Plants highly attractive for stemborer egg laying were selected and employed as trap crops (pull), to draw pests away from the main crop. Plants that Introduction repelled stemborer females were selected as intercrops (push). The stemborers are attracted to the trap plant, and are repelled Food insecurity continues to affect millions of Africa’s poor from the main cereal crop using a repellent intercrop (push). Root and is likely to worsen with climate change and population exudates of leguminous repellent intercrops also effective-ly growth. With per capita food production having declined in control the parasitic striga weed through an allelopathic the past two decades (Muchena et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Striga Hermonthica (Del.) Benth. Using Formulated Mycoherbicides Under Sudan Field Conditions
    Eldur Balla Zahran Biological control of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. using formulated mycoherbicides under Sudan field conditions Institute for Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics University of Hohenheim Prof. Dr. J. Sauerborn Biological control of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. using formulated mycoherbicides under Sudan field conditions Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree ″Doctor der Agrarwissenschaften″ (Dr.sc.agr. / Ph.D. in Agricultural Sciences) to the Faculty Agricultural Sciences Presented by Eldur Zahran Sudan 2008 This thesis accepted as a doctoral dissertation in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree ″Doctor der Agrarwissenschaften″ (Dr.sc.agr. / Ph.D. in Agricultural Sciences) by the Faculty Agricultural Sciences at University of Hohenheim on 17.12.2007. Date of oral examination: 08.01.2008 Examination committee: Supervisor and Reviewer Prof. Dr. J. Sauerborn Institute for Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics University of Hohenheim Co-Reviewer Prof. Dr. Gehards Institute of Phytomedicine, Dep. of Weed Science, University of Hohenheim Additional examiner Prof. Dr. H. Piepho Institute of Plant Production and Grassland Research Vice-Dean and Head of the Prof. Dr. W. Bessei Committee Dean of the Faculty Agricultural Sciences Dedication To the soul of my father and sisters: Khalda and Magda To all who contribute to the success of this work Table of content 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Sorghum as an important food crop 1 1.2 Striga
    [Show full text]
  • Striga Asiatica
    FACTSHEETS FOR FARMERS Created in Rwanda, February 2016 www.plantwise.org Striga asiatica Recognize the problem Striga asiatica. (Photo by © Ton Family: Orobanchaceae (broomrape family). Rulkens, Flickr.com) Common names: Asiatic witchweed, red witchweed, witchweed, Striga French: Herbe des sorcières, Striga; Kinyarwanda: Kurisuka, Bariyentaraza, Mugabudatsimburwa, Rwona; Chichewa: Kaufiti; Kiswahili: Viduha. Annual, broadleaved, parasitic herb (30cm high); always associated with hosts in the grass family; stems are four-sided, branched or unbranched, with rough hairs and opposite leaves; has few roots; feeds on the roots of its hosts. Leaves: Green and narrowly lanceolate (1-5cm long), sparsely covered in rough hairs. Flowers: Colour highly variable, generally red in East and South Africa, yellow variant also present in Africa, and almost invariably white variant in India and Myanmar; flowers small (1cm) and arranged in spikes. Striga asiatica in rice. (Photo by © Fruits: Swollen seed pods (0.5cm) containing several hundred seeds. AfricaRice, Flickr.com) Seeds: Brown, small and dust-like (0.3 mm long). Seeds may remain dormant in the soil for 10- 20 years. Background Origin: Probably native to Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Introduction: Seed contaminant. Habitat: Semi-arid tropic regions of Africa and Asia; favoured by relatively dry, infertile soil conditions, often associated with sandy soils, but can grow in a wide range of soil types. Spread: Seeds are spread by wind, water, soil, animals, man, machinery, vehicles and as a contaminant of crop and pasture seed and fodder. Invades: Crop fields and grasslands; parasitized crops include sorghum, maize, millets, rice and sugarcane. Impacts: Plants parasitized by Striga are less able to acquire nutrients and water.
    [Show full text]
  • Witchweed: a Percent (From 450,000 Acres to About 5,500)
    United States Department of FACTSHEET Agriculture •••••••••••••••••••••••• Animal and Plant Health Inspection Plant Protection Service & Quarantine April 2000 APHISacreage supporting it has been reduced by 99 Witchweed: A percent (from 450,000 acres to about 5,500). Eradication is accomplished in three phases: Parasitic Pest • Survey activities find and map all infestations, • Quarantine activities prevent human spread of Witchweed (Striga asiatica) is a parasitic plant witchweed beyond the infested region, and that attacks some of the most important crops in the • Control activities seek to prevent existing plants United States—corn, sorghum, sugar cane, and rice. from producing seeds and to destroy seeds It also parasitizes certain weedy grasses. already in the soil. Unlike most weeds, which merely compete with These activities involve the cooperative efforts of crops, parasites like witchweed do their damage Federal and State governments as well as the more directly. They rob nutrients and moisture by general public. tapping directly into the host’s root system. Consequently, the host spends energy supporting Survey witchweed growth at its own expense. While a APHIS and State cooperators have taken steps parasitized host, such as a corn plant, may be less to prevent this dangerous weed from spreading from productive (produce fewer seeds), each witchweed infested areas in North and South Carolina. APHIS is plant produces as many as 50,000 seeds. offering a $25 reward to anyone who identifies and The American witchweed is one of many related reports the weed. After receiving a report, officials parasitic plants native to Africa, India, the Middle remove the plant to stop reproduction.
    [Show full text]